Tag: good

  • Good to go

    Good to go

    • Students Loan is worth the wait given the amendments to the law to make it more inclusive and soften criteria for eligibility

    The students loan issue has understandably continued to generate widespread interest from diverse stakeholders. The Chief of Staff to President Bola Tinubu, Femi Gbajabiamila, had remarked that he had noticed that most of the requests for assistance that he had been receiving from his constituents as a legislator related to school fees and other educational needs. Consequently, he decided to sponsor a bill on students loan tagged “Bill for an Act to provide for easy access to higher education through interest-free loans from the Nigerian Education Bank, established in this Act with a view to providing education for all Nigerians and for other purposes connected thereto.”

    Upon winning the primary election of the All Progressives Congress (APC), one of Asiwaju Tinubu’s commitments was to ensure that no qualified Nigerian was denied education on the basis of financial handicap, and the Gbajabiamila students loan bill seemed to have provided a broad framework.

    On winning the presidential election, President Tinubu duly signed the students loan bill into law on June 12, 2023, and September, 2023 was set for the commencement of its implementation. However, there were strident criticisms of different aspects of the law. This, among other reasons, made it essential to shift the date of commencement to January 2024. But even that date came and passed.

    While supporters of the President saw this as evidence of untiring responsiveness to the continuing criticisms of the proposed loan scheme and a desire to be painstaking in the preparations for the take-off of the crucial scheme, the President’s detractors saw the changes in date as an indication of lack of intention to implement it.

    Then on March 14, 2024, President Tinubu forwarded a bill titled “The Students Loan (Access to Education) (Repeal and Re-enactment) Bill 2024” to the National Assembly with a view to revising the 2023 one by accommodating various criticisms and proposals for amendment. It is that new bill that the President signed into law on April 3, 2024, and the new law has been greeted with approval by many stakeholders.

    Read Also: If you can’t produce a good film, pack up – Yvonne Jegede

    One of the key features or modifications in the new law is that it has expanded access to the loan by including candidates for tertiary education and those for vocational training in the potential beneficiaries. In fact, the new law is omnibus and forward-looking enough to accommodate other categories of beneficiaries in future.

    The sustainability of the loan scheme is also guaranteed by providing that one per cent of collectable taxes by the Federal Government would be ploughed into the loan fund. Moreover, the exacting criteria for eligibility such as parental income level and potentially difficult-to-procure guarantorship have been eased. It is also important to note in this regard that should a beneficiary die before offsetting their loan, both the beneficiary and their guarantors are freed of all liabilities connected with the loan.

    These and other features of the re-enacted students loan law appear to be more pragmatic, more responsive to key stakeholder criticisms and is a good way of subsidising education, because it has the features of both a welfare programme and a business engagement.

    To make the scheme achieve its objectives, it is necessary to devise and regularly revise the mechanisms for loan repayment. The issue of corruption is also a serious cause for concern which should continue to be innovatively addressed. In line with the methodical steps being taken in preparation for its take-off and the quality-enhancing revisions that have taken place so far, the law and operations of the students loan scheme should be subjected to regular review to ensure that it delivers the envisaged benefits sustainably. 

  • Designed for good, thrives on evil

    Let us start this piece in Jeopardy style:

    Category: Riddles

    Clue: It is an institution designed for human good, but it thrives on evil machinations.

    Answer: What is politics?

    Still amazed by, and unable to wrap my head around the paradox of an institution which is designed for good but continues to thrive on evil, today, I set my gaze one more time on how politics deliberately dispenses with moral values and what this means for our humanity.

    One of the unproven narratives woven around the legendary political juggernaut of Oyo State, the late Chief Lamidi Adedibu was the question that he allegedly once posed to an aspiring politician who sought his blessing for an elective position. “So, you are interested in politics?” the Chief allegedly asked his guest. On an affirmative response from the man, the chief followed with series of neck-breaking quizzes: “Are you strong? Can you tell lies? Can you slander? Can you kill?” The message conveyed by these rhetorical questions apparently was that politics is not for the moral purist, neither is it for the weak-kneed. It is for the strong and ruthless. It is for liars and ego-driven maniacs. Is this right?

    Assume it is right, an obvious question is why would such an institution even be needed in the first place? What would recommend it as an alternative to the anarchy that might prevail without it? Why leave a state of anarchy in which you could creatively outsmart others for a supposedly civilized polity where you hand over your rights to ruthless hustlers bent on making you subservient forever?

    But there is a short answer to the question whether politics is for the strong and ruthless, liars and ego-driven maniacs. No, not in its original intent. As nearly every political philosopher conceptualizes it, the political community is borne out of a desire to escape a state of insecurity where the exercise of freedom is fraught with severe risk and danger. At which point, rational nature kicks in and individuals decide to go into a contract of association with others so willing. The union so formed cannot at the risk of irrationality include ceding our rights to liars and ruthless hustlers.

    Chief Obafemi Awolowo, ever so thoughtful, is characteristically lucid in his account of the historical trajectory of the state especially in our own corner of the world. After an exhaustive discussion of the evolution of the state with the transition from one family to a collection of families, and the establishment of a full complement of state functionaries, the sage concludes that “it is the passionate desire for peace amongst them, and for mutual defence or protection against those outside their union, as well as for the procurement of economic benefits, which led to the emergence of, first, the village states, then the city-states, followed by the nation-state or multi-nation states.” (The People’s Republic, 81).

    The significance of the foregoing summary of Awolowo’s observation should not escape us. People come together to form a state or political community in order to maximize their common interests in security and socio-economic benefits. If this was their intent, we cannot expect them to accede to the conduct of their affairs by liars and ruthless hustlers—if it is up to them.

    Modern democratic republic is the outcome of the people’s struggle against the old idea of the divine right of kings, a conception that was thoroughly refuted by John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the 18th century. But even the idea of the divine right of kings is often combined with a moralistic view of politics. Kings are generally counseled to dispense judgment with moral considerations and to use their power from a foundation of moral virtue. Those that fail to do so are rebuked.

    The beginning of our modern obsession with power without morality is traceable to the Italian political theorist, Niccolo Machiavelli who made a bold distinction between political power and morality. Moral philosophers have drawn a distinction between power and authority, understood as the rightful use of power. Machiavelli dispensed with this distinction, arguing that there is no moral basis for the distinction and the only point of interest to the ruler is power, however it is achieved or used.

    Machiavellians populate our modern political world, and especially our own corner of that world. This is an explanation for the many aberrations that we experience. The concern of many in politics is to secure power for its sake. For some others, power is the means of personal enrichment at the expense of the common interests of all. For yet others, seeking and securing power is to inflict the most harm to perceived enemies.

    You may already be thinking that these various purposes of power-seeking could be counter-productive and you may be right. If a politician seeks power to inflict harm on perceived opponents, does he or she not think of an end to his or her power? And what if his enemies then take over power? Of course, a rational being would take this prospect into consideration. But it is precisely why we have the phenomenon of perpetual power-seekers. Think of Mugabe and Biya, the latter, just sworn in to another seven-year term at age 85.

    Those who seek power for personal enrichment have “good” personal reason to hustle and give it whatever it takes. Unconcerned with any enduring legacy, they will lie and kill to get what they want. For them, it is important to secure a future for their family, many generations into the future. They forget that no ill-gotten wealth lasts long, and the would-be beneficiaries may not have the skill set to make the most of such wealth. Of course, the certain curse of a bitter public is bound to impact negatively. Consider the plight of the Mobutus of the world.

    What if you just love power and seek it for its sake? Are you likely to be bothered by moral concerns? First, as odd as it may sound, it is not unusual and not out of the question for people to just want to have power without any further purpose or reason other than occupying a position of prestige. If Hobbes is right, and there is a natural propensity for glory-seeking, this is understandable. And since it is not for any moral purpose, it cannot also be constrained by moral concerns.

    Unfortunately, there are lots of folks in this category, at every level of our governing institutions from local government to the highest offices in the land. They want power because it is glorious to have it, without a clue what they want to do with it. And they will get there by hook or crook, shuffling aside moral compunctions.

    Let us give Machiavelli the benefit of the doubt. Let us imagine him simply analyzing the reality of power politics as opposed to offering injunctions about how rulers should conduct themselves. In other words, the Prince, the Prime Minister, or the President is just a human agent with power using that power for ends that he/she designs as he/she deems fit and without appeal to moral norms. If this is so, Machiavelli cannot be blamed for exposing the reality of political power as a political scientist might.

    We must now decide whether in our political community we want to embrace Machiavelli’s analysis of power-usage. It is important to note that even the ruler whose use of power Machiavelli theorized about (or endorsed) is not expected to be honest about his motives. For, if he does, the people are not likely to be pleased. Therefore, the ruler is deliberately deceptive.

    We have a clue, then, to what our attitude ought to be toward deliberate deception and lying on the part of politicians and political leaders. Deception takes citizens as fools. Lying is a moral flaw and a rejection of the humanity of its object. And there is no greater way of objectifying citizens than putting a price on them. This is what happens when they are incentivized to sell their votes. It is a flagrant disrespect for the humanity of fellow citizens.

     

  • Good campaign

    •Charlie Boy group’s advocacy for sound voter registration is the first crucial step to free elections 

    Any move to make voter registration impeccable is welcome; and that is why Charles Oputa, otherwise known as Charlie Boy, and his Our Mumu Don Do movement deserve praise for their call to make the ongoing voter registration exercise better.

    From news reports, the group visited the Abuja national headquarters of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to complain about the alleged shambolic nature of the registration exercise; and also called on INEC to make amends. The areas it wanted improvements were challenges noted in electronic voting, documentation and the adequate capture of as many as eligible voters that turn up.

    “We humbly request a strategic engagement with INEC to discuss issues identified above,” Deji Adeyanju said, reading a formal letter to his INEC hosts, “and other likely developments obstructing the electoral processes; and how we can equally be of significant help as stakeholders.”

    The group also complained of alleged under-aged voting in the just concluded local government election in Kano. INEC has responded, at another forum, that local government elections were conducted by State Independent Electoral Commissions (SIECs).

    That defence would appear sound since SIECs seldom use card readers, a vital quality control check, to ensure the integrity of the voter register, by ascertaining every potential voter’s fingerprint, before being allowed to vote.  Still, it is a pointer to the imperative for even better vigilance, at the registration stage, to checkmate the systemic skewing of the electoral roll by unscrupulous politicians.  That is why every concerned democrat must push for SIECs too to invest in card readers, so that they don’t continue to kill the electoral culture at the grassroots.

    However, moving for INEC to conduct local government elections would be anti-federal. That would jar against the spirit of the Constitution; and further reinforce the debacle of over-centralisation of the Nigerian space, logically resulting in stunted development in all spheres of life.

    The Charlie Boy group also cautioned INEC against disenfranchising a large swathe of the populace. This was a natural worry from reported glitches during the registration exercise. This has made not a few to declare the exercise erratic, so much so that even within a state, it cannot boast of a uniform level of success.

    These are key observations, and INEC would do well to address them dispassionately. If the collective goal is to achieve elections that reflect the true will of the people, that should not be any especial chore.

    Still, it is a truism of the Nigerian situation that between activism and partisan politics, there might be but a very thin line, at times as thin as gossamer. So, it is not impossible that an activist is a front for a rabid partisan, sworn to blackmailing INEC to doing his partisan bidding. Such phoney lobbies should be isolated and discounted.

    The best way to do this is for INEC itself to stay focused on its mandate and execute it with candour, openness and integrity. As the old saying goes, honesty is the best policy. If INEC is fair to all, and is perceived to be so, its first hurdle in free and fair elections may have been scaled.

    Still, to be fair is one thing. To be perceived as fair is another, particularly in the Nigerian space, with its terrible blur of the normative and the dysfunctional. That is why INEC must keep engaging its critical stakeholders and the general public; to share its experiences and difficulties with them.

    As routine, it should also mount periodic and ceaseless public enlightenment campaigns to educate voters on their duties and responsibilities. That it could do by partnering with political parties, pressure groups and non-governmental organisations interested in voter education, organisation and allied activities.

    But even before going public, it must get its training, organisation and logistics right. The more Nigeria deepens its democracy — it is the 18th year now, going to 19 since 1999 — INEC should be seen to have developed a certain level of competence and capacity, which can only get better with more practice.

    Elections are the most visible rituals of democracy. Although elections alone cannot aggregate the whole gamut of democracy, they are the most physical and observable gauge, which must be kept sacred and legitimate. The integrity or otherwise of the electoral roll occupies the central pillar of it all. That is why INEC cannot afford to get it wrong, without catastrophic consequences.

     

  • Ekwueme was a Good, Exemplary Nigerian – Obi, Nwosu, Ogbeh, Orji

    The former Gov. of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi has described the former Vice President, Late Dr. Alex Ekwueme as a good Nigerian, who showed us example through his commitment to Nation- building.

    Obi, who accompanied his mortal remains from U.K yesterday spoke during the brief ceremonies  at the Nnamdi Azikiwe Airport, Abuja. Describing Ekwueme as a father, Obi said that “the best way to preserve his memories  is through good governance along his lofty dreams of peace and development anchored on justice and equity, which he pursued with adamantine consistency.”

    Similarly, the former Minister of Health, Prof. ABC Nwosu said that Dr. Ekwueme, until his last breath, remained a thoroughbred professional, focused politician,  committed patriot and worthy statesman. He prayed to God to grant him eternal rest.

    On the part of the Minister of Agriculture, Chief Audu Ogbeh, Ekwueme was a true father and a patriot.

    Collaborating the foregoing, the former Governor of Abia State, Senator Theodore Orji described Ekwueme as one politician that had the interest of the country at heart and remained focused and consistent on that.

    The Minister of Agriculture, Chief Audu Ogbeh( middle), flanked by fmr Gov. Peter Obi( left), and Fmr. Minister of Health, Prof. ABC Nwosu, during the brief burial ceremonies of Late Dr. Alex Ekwueme at Nnamdi Azikiwe Airport, Abuja, yesterday.

     

  • Oil and gas: The good, the bad and the unpredictable

    Oil and gas: The good, the bad and the unpredictable

    For stakeholders in the oil and gas industry, the outgoing year is a mixed bag of blessing. AKINOLA AJIBADE examines events that shaped the sector during the year.

    Increase in crude oil prices

    The year started on a very good note, as prices of Brent crude, rose to $58 per barrel from $44. 73cent per barrel, a development which excited stakeholders as well as rekindled hope in them that better days were ahead in the global oil sector. Though the price slipped to between $45 per barrel in August, that has not in any way doubted the future of the market, as the price hits an all-time high of $65.88 per barrel this December. As usual, the issue elicited positive response from stakeholders, including the government, as they projected that crude oil price will hit  $68 per barrel by the first quarter of next year.

     

    Pipeline vandalism

    Like a recurring decimal, pipeline vandalism kept on resonating in the Nigerian petroleum sector. In the first two quarters of 2017, cases of destruction of oil and gas installations by militants were on the increase, a development which necessitated the declaration of Force Majeure on such facilities, by the Federal Government. The issue made crude oil output to fall below 2.2 million barrels per day, even as a group known as Movement for the Emancipation of Niger-Delta (MEND) claimed responsibilities for some of the attacks.

    In November, Nigeria’s crude oil output slipped to 70,000 barrels per day (bpd) as exports of Bonny Light crude were under force majeure for part of the month. This, no doubt, affected earnings since Nigeria derived 70 per cent of its revenue from oil imports. In all these, the Federal Government, local and foreign oil companies were badly hit by the development.

    For example, Seplat Production Development Company reported a net loss of $98 million (N24 billion) in the first nine months of 20I6, compared to a net profit of $69 million (N14 billion) in 2015, following the shut–in of the Forcados terminal and suspension of exports from mid-October, and combined with the effects of lower prices of crude oil.

    Also, Oando Energy Resources (OER) during the nine months, which ended on September 30, 2016 recorded a 20 per cent decrease in total production of 12.0 million barrels oil equivalent (MMboe) (average 43,617 boe/day), compared to 15.1 MMboe (average 55,154 boe/day), in the company’s gross profit, which decreased by 52 per cent, N28.7 billion compared to N60 billion it recorded in the previous year. The company said it faced operational challenges due to the unrest in the Niger Delta. Lekoil also recorded a net loss of $8.1 million during the first half of 20I6.

    Besides, oil majors including Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell Plc in 2016, reported their lowest quarterly profits since 1999 and 2005, respectively, due to attacks on their operation and other issues.

    The former country President, National Association of Energy Economists (NAEE), Wunmi Iledare, said incessant attacks on oil facilities affected operations in the industry in 2017, adding that production and exploration activities are worst hit. He added that despite talks on how to end unrest between leaders in the region and the Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo in May, attacks on oil facilities persist.

     

    Passage of Petroleum Industry Bill

    The passage of the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB) by the Senate has rekindled hopes in the sector. The bill, which suffered delays in the National Assembly for almost 17 years, due to bureaucratic bottlenecks, is expected to  transform the industry in future.

    Through the PIGB, a new agency, known as the Nigeria Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NPRC) will be established with a view to take over the functions of the Petroleum Inspectorate (PI), the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) and the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA). The Commission will also administer and enforce  policies, laws and regulations relating to all aspects of petroleum operations as  spelt out in the provisions of the Act.

    In the PIGB, the Ministry of Petroleum Resources will be renamed Ministry of Petroleum Incorporated, while the Minister of Petroleum Resources, on the recommendation of the new Commission, can grant, amend, renew, extend or revoke any licence or lease facilities required for petroleum production, pursuant to the provisions of the Act or any other enactment.

    The bill also proposed that when the commission is created, it shall be vested with all assets, funds, resources and other movable and immovable property, which immediately before the commencement of operation of the new commission,were held by the PI, DPR and PPPRA. According to the Senate, the move was geared towards unbundling the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and the petroleum industry.

    An expert in energy law, Dr Ayoade Adedayo, said the bill will revolutionise the industry, as well as ensure competitiveness among operators. The industry, he said, will be competing with its counterparts abroad when the bill is finally passed, urging operators to prepare themselves for the task ahead.

    Adedayo, who lectures at the University of Lagos, said changes, which have eluded the sector, will start manifesting now that the PIGB has been passed by the Senate.

     

    Fuel scarcity

    Fuel scarcity in the industry has become a perennial issue and unpredictable, as Nigerians experience it yearly. The country is still going through its throes caused by both human and material factors such as distribution bottlenecks and differential prices paid by marketers for the product. The scarcity pitched stakeholders against one another as they trade blames on the issue.

    The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) Southwest Chairman, Alhaji Debo Ahmed, said the fuel scarcity was caused by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation(NNPC), which according to him, connived with the  Depot and Private Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPMAN) to shortchange its members.

    He said the problem was instigated by the NNPC, which supplies fuel to DAPMAN at N33.80 per litre, while DAPMAN sells the product to them at N42 per litre.

    According to him, the development has left little or no gains for the marketers, which he said, are struggling to survive.

    But DAPMAN Secretary, Femi Adewole, said the allegations are plausible, accusing marketers of crying foul because they are unable to get direct supply from the NNPC.

    While this lasted, the NNPC intervened by increasing fuel supply to Lagos and its environs.

     

    PENGASSAN strike

    The Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), fixed December 18th for its nationwide strike, following inability of the Minister of Petroleum Resources, Dr Ibe Kachikwu, to broker peace between PENGASSAN and Neconde Energy Service Limited.

    PENGASSAN had demanded the re-instatement of some sacked workers by Neconde management, a request which the company was not willing to grant. This informed the decision by PENGASSAN to embark on the strike. It was, however, called off by the Association earlier in the week at government’s intervention.

     

    Power sector

    The sector is plagued by poor power generation, distribution and transmission, a development, which has worsened the situation in the industry. Generation was increased by 687megwatts(Mw) of electricity from 3,000 megawatts (Mw) in the fourth quarter of 2016 to 3,687 megawatts (Mw) in the first quarter of 2017. Similarly, the country increased its generation capacity to 6,803 megawatts (Mw) of electricity in August.

    The Power, Works and Housing Minister, Mr Babatunde Fashola, attributed it to the resolve by the Federal Government to substantially improve the sector and the economy. At the 18th monthly power sector meeting in Kano, Fashola said: “As  at August 10,  6803Mw  was  recorded  as the current available generating capability, with a wheeling capacity of 6700 Mw by the Transmission Company of Nigeria(TCN), currently constrained by the inability of the power distribution companies (DisCos) to take load.’’

    Commenting further, the Minister said the Federal Government was doing its best to ensure improvement in electricity supply, adding that the government has embarked on serious expansion of transmission capacity with some power plants already completed, while others have reached advanced stage of completion.

     

    DisCos problems

    The eleven power distribution companies (DisCos) tried their best to improve electricity supply in the country, but were limited by problems of poor distribution networks, meters supply,  shortage of transformers and other infrastructural facilities. More worrisome are issues of epileptic power supply and scarcity of meters.

    Despite the decision by power firms to conduct enumeration exercise and provide meters to their customers, the problem persists. To solve metering problem, Fashola urged operators to democratise the process of supplying meters to customers.

    He said meter provision is not a monopoly of DisCos, but is open and regulated by the National Electricity Regulatory Commission( NERC), adding that the democratisation of meter provision is intended to reduce the conflict between customers and DisCos and reduce losses to the sector.

    Ikeja Electric (IE) Chief Executive Officer,  Anthony Youdeweoi, said the firm has distributed meters to its teeming customers, adding that meter is a problem in the sector. He said the firm has lined up programmes in 2018 to meet the yearnings of its customers.

    ‘’We at (Ikeja Electric) are aware of problems facing customers in the industry. Of importance is shortage of meters; an area where we have been doing our best and will continue to do our best in the years ahead,’’ he said.

  • Tinubu to Buhari: the good you have begun … do it more

    Tinubu to Buhari: the good you have begun … do it more

    There is no basis for comparison between the President Muhammadu Buhari administration and the previous one, All Progressives Congress (APC) stalwart Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu argues. He says in his remarks at the presentation of “Making Steady, Sustainable Progress”, a book written by three presidential spokesmen, that the past government failed to save for the rainy day while Buhari’s is laying a solid foundation for the future. The former Lagos Governor assures Nigerians that the government is on track.

    e are many things as a people. Among them, is that we can be a clamorous nation.

    Noise abounds. Voices rise. Critics moan. The angry and the desperate even question whether this nation should exist, whether it is an experience or experiment that has failed.

    Mr. President, the noise can be loud, almost deafening at times. Yet ultimately both noise and clamor shall fade, for progress.

    What shall be left is reality and fact. The core reality, the fact of our political existence, is that Nigeria is an indivisible entity; a nation of many peoples wedded in common enterprise with its better days yet before it.

    Yes, we were born of a complicated past, and face a challenging present.  Ah, but our future, yes our future, can be one of progress, compassion, justice and hope, if only we have the courage to make it so.

    We have passed but two years under this government.  In the measure of human affairs, this seems a brief period in part but also long in part.  We are both the same and different now than we were then.

    Before this government came into being, Boko Haram wreaked havoc on a daily basis. Spreading its evil arm across great expanses of our national territory, Boko Haram invaded towns and villages, erasing the peace and normalcy of the people to replace it with wanton brutality, hatred and death.

    They hoisted their dreadful flag where only the green and white of Nigeria should have been.

    Today, that evil flag is not planted over an inch of our precious land. This violent scourge recedes into the darkened shadows of inhumanity from whence it came.

    The people, once under its horrid dominion, now breathe the air of freedom and safety.

    Boko Haram has not been completely defeated, but there is no question that it has been decimated and made shorter and weaker. They shall never constitute the threat they once were.

    This is no accident. It is the result of the policies and commitment of President Muhammadu Buhari, his government and the men and women of our armed forces who place their lives on the line in silent heroism to protect this nation and its people.

    Had the previous government remained in place, Boko Haram would have surely eaten more territory and devoured more people. This nation might have indeed been divided and cut asunder, not by choice but by the knife of terrorism.

    The prior government used the public treasury as a private hedge fund or a charity that limited its giving only to themselves.

    So much money grew feet and ran away faster than Usain Bolt ever could. That which could have been spent on national development was squandered in ways that would cause the devil to blush.

    One minister and her rogues’ gallery picked the pocket of this nation for billions of dollars. While poor at governance, these people could give a master thief lessons in the sleight of hand.  In governance, they earned a red card but in corruption, they won the gold medal.

    It was not that our institutions had become infected by corruption. Corruption had become institutionalised.

    President Buhari has set an axe to the root of this dangerous tree.  I would be lying if I said the war against large-scale corruption has been won. It has not.  It will take time and countless swings of the axe to fall such a deeply-rooted tree. But try we must. This is what the President is doing.

    Gone are the times when a minister can pilfer billions of dollars as easy as plucking a piece of candy from the table.

    We have much to do to combat this disease.  Not only must we track down the takers. In the long term, we must review the salaries of public servants and create universal credits for our people to reduce temptation.

    We must also take greater care by placing people of character, competence and goodness into key positions. When they fail, they must be removed without remorse or favour.

    Unlike its predecessor, this government has demonstrated the will to walk this path. While this might not cause much fanfare or celebration, this cleanses the institutions upon which a nation’s wellbeing is founded with a future assured.

    The economy remains our biggest long-term challenge. The prior government operated during times of plenty. The opposite is the case now. Sadly, that plenty was stolen or directed toward policies of no lasting consequence to the average Nigerian, save to compel them to say another opportunity had been wasted.

    Through no fault of its own, this administration had to grapple with a rapid fall in oil prices. That fall brought recession and collapsed our exchange rate regime. More fundamentally, it showed that the very economic model upon which this nation operated was outmoded and flawed. Unfortunately the past administration did nothing to re-calibrate the economy.

    With fewer resources at hand, this government is compelled to do more. It must respond to immediate needs in a way that leads to long-term economic reform.

    This will be a complex journey. This government has taken the first steps in the right direction.

    We are inching out of recession. The exchange rate has stabilised. Internationally, we are seen as on the mend and have been recognised for making significant progress in the ease of doing business.

    In hindsight, the election of President Buhari had an air of inevitability to it. Despite the odds arrayed against him, the sovereign will of the people lifted him to victory. He is truly the right man for this time and place.

    This is why I am pleased by the publication of this book with the just and appropriate title: “Making Steady, Sustainable Progress for Nigeria’s Peace and Security.”

    The President’s media team, Femi Adesina, Garba Shehu and Laolu Akande, worked with the various ministries to assemble this comprehensive, objective catalogue of what this government has done. This book is a good account of the work this government has accomplished to date.

    This book is needed because it sheds light on what may be obscure to the average person.

    President Buhari is a man who exercises an economy of speech. He is a man of action not of chatter.

    He will not spend time blowing his own trumpet because his preference is to move to the next important task.

    Thus, it is apt that these men serve him in a way he would never think of serving himself.

    I have already discussed the progress made regarding security, corruption and the general economy, this triad being the core promises made by the President and our party to the Nigerian people.

    But this book reveals so much more being done in all areas of life. This work may not be spectacular but it is essential. It may not be flashy but it is foundational and enduring.

    In agriculture, where the bulk of our people earn their living, this government has strengthened research and development to enhance productivity. It has taken steps to increase exports, while rationalising fertilizer and seed distribution. Farm credits and financing have improved, allowing farmers to expand existing crops and grow new ones, including fisheries and aquaculture.

    I don’t know about you, but I call this the progress we need!

    In education, this administration has reduced the number of out-of school children. School lunch programmes for the poorest among us have been initiated.

    Teachers have been hired and are being better trained. This government seeks to inject ICT (Information and Ciommunication Technology) into the school system. Universal Basic Education (Universal Basic Education) is more of a priority than ever before. Our universities and other tertiary institutions are better funded than ever before.

    I don’t know about you but I call this the progress we need!

    With regard to labour, this government works with the private sector to create jobs and to engage people in the training required as we transit from a mono-dimensional economy to one more diverse and reliant on industry and skill. I call this the progress we need!

    Regarding social welfare, the opposition scoffed when this government announced living stipends for the poorest families. Now, this is becoming a reality. Relief of the poor has replaced the ridicule of the uncaring. The selfish unbelievers scoff no longer. I call this the progress we need.

    Regarding infrastructure, this government is making progress in building and rehabilitation of strategic ports, bridges, railways and highways. I call this progress that we need!

    This government responded when states were unable to pay workers’ salaries. This saved tens of thousands of families of civil servants from wallowing in despair and poverty. I call this the type of responsible government we need!

    I could go on with examples. But due to the constraints of time, let me say just that this book demonstrates this government has moved with a sure and steady hand toward sustainable progress.

    While each change may not be dramatic in itself, the cumulative effects of these reforms make for a stronger nation and a future assured.

    Yet, I lay caution to those people whose words and actions would counsel complacency. True, much good has been done by this government to ignore.

    However, too many of our people remain too poor and put-out to ignore as well. Daylight comes but not yet to all and not in equal measure.

    Due to the neglect of prior governments, our economy was not allowed to blossom in a way that offered jobs to the poor and empowered the common man.

    Where prosperity should have stood, poverty was erected. Where progress should have been established, stagnation assumed residence.  We are trying hard to escape this deep hole.

    While we work toward this good end, we must recognise the situation of millions of our people. Wrongfully denied for so long, they suffer still. But we ask them to take heart. Don’t forfeit hope. Understand that tomorrow will not be as the past when what was built and bought was not intended for you.

    What we are now building is meant for you. This is your government and you will be the beneficiaries of its policies and programmes. You are no longer the forgotten. You are the hope and promise of a nation and its future.

    As this government implements its economic plans, the griping poverty you have long suffered will give way and ultimately turn into the fertile progress and prosperity that only good governance can bring. We do this with a sense of urgency!

    We race against unrelenting time. By incident of technology, the black liquid underground could be converted into money and international prestige.

    By further incident of technology, that liquid is already progressively losing its economic value. We no longer have an underground vault of money. One day, the liquid beneath our feet will simply be that – merely liquid beneath our feet.

    We must train our policies to ensure when that day finally comes we will not be lost again. The history of a depressed economy must not be allowed to repeat itself.

    The way forward

    Here, permit me to offer a few observations on how we might proceed. There will be those who might distort what I say here as evidence of “space” between President Buhari and me. Their evidence will be false and their news about this will be fake. Mischief never dies. Fortunately, nor does the truth.

    What I proffer today is done in the spirit of utmost respect and affinity by one who wants the best for this government and for Nigeria. I say these things to encourage the government to achieve the greatness the times demand and of which this government is capable.

    The battlefront upon which this nation’s fate shall be decided is the economy. On this, almost all else shall hang.

    In addition to talking about this book which describes our immediate past and present, I want to briefly mention another document:  The 2018 Budget.

    This budget moves us farther in the right direction. It is a bolder, more creative one than this government’s earlier editions.

    It shows this government has embraced its progressive identity despite the chorus of opposition. Also that it more clearly realises the depths of the economic and financial challenges before us.

    One of the important aspects of this budget is the capital expenditure for needed infrastructure.

    This investment means the government fully recognises our economy must grow but that it cannot expand beyond the parameters of the infrastructural grid that serves it.

    With this book and with the budget, we come to the place where the past intersects with the present to interact with the future; the place where what we do or don’t do will dictate the Nigeria of tomorrow.

    We are inching out of recession but growth must increase.

    It is time to lead our people to a place where poverty and hunger become infrequent and where prosperity and hope are the daily fare of the common man.

    There are three key ideas I would like to table before you today.

    First, we are among the world’s most populous nations and potentially one of its most powerful. No populous nation has ever attained prosperity without first establishing a robust industrial capacity.

    In one form or another, England, America, Japan and China implemented policies to protect key industries, promote employment and encourage exports.

    These nations represent the past, present and immediate future of national economic achievement.

    If Nigeria is to be a leader in the next phase of global economic history, we must learn from these prior successes. The common thread between these nations was the objective of buffering strategic industries in ways that allow for the expansion and growth of the overall economy.

    In this vein, our national industrial revolution plan must be more than mere words. It must be refined and implemented with a laser-like focus. Just as the private sector may partner with government on public endeavours, government must guide and support the private sector into new areas of industry and production.

    The government must invest in research and new products the private sector may find risky and uncertain in the initial stage.  The government policy must push and incentivise the private sector into the production of goods that will be demanded in the immediate future and for some time to come.

    This requires a heretofore unprecedented coordination between the private sector and government.

    Whether we focus on steel, textiles, cars, machinery components, processed agricultural goods and other items, or any combination of the above, we must manufacture things the rest of the world wants to buy and not necessarily the things we think are the easiest to do.

    Second, as a corollary to the push for industrial maturity, we need a national infrastructural plan that accords with both the industrial plan and with extant agricultural activity. The fulcrum of this plan must be continued progress in the achievement of adequate and affordable electric power, especially solar and winds.

    Third, we must help the common farmer by improving rural output and incomes.  We must return to commodity exchange boards or similar mechanism to allow farmers to secure their income and hedge against loss. An active and expanded agricultural loan scheme is needed to further promote these goals.

    In addition, more needs to be done to make business and consumer credit available by lowering interest rates. We also must move toward true federalism by the balance of power and responsibility between the federal government and the states. In so doing, we attain the correct balance between our collective purpose on one hand and our separate grassroots realities on the other.

    Again I say, this book is a good portrait of what the Buhari government has accomplished. Anyone who seeks an accurate assessment of governance in Nigeria today must make this book their reading companion.

    The work attempts to expertly chronicle what has been done. Its title: “Making Steady, Sustainable Progress is unassailable.”

    Any person with a passing regard for truth must admit that change and progress has come. We are indeed a more secure, industrious and forthright nation than we were two years ago.

    But, my people, only half the story has been told. We have, at the very least, the second half of this term remaining, and I dare not say any more than that for the time being.

    The deeds of this book are now our history. It is this taste of history which allows us to face the future in better circumstance. Our future is one of beckoning challenge yet potential greatness.

    Through no fault of their own, too many of our people are without. Too many parents cannot properly feed and clothe their precious children, too many young adults exist in the void of joblessness, and too many of us do not have the resources to care for elderly parents who once cared for them. We must cure these wrongs.

    If I were an architect, I would say that President Buhari has used the past two years to wisely lay the deep and wide foundation for a new building called a better Nigeria. Today, as I stand before you all, I implore him and his government.

    The good you have started…. do it the more. The good that you have yet to achieve …. get to it with a laser- like focus.

    If we do as we must, we can well together construct this new building so that it will have place and habitation for those who have lived outside and on the margins to come in and finally partake of the bounty and good harvest a proud and true nation has to offer its people.

    Let this be the story of the next book to be written of this government.

     

     

  • How to be a good leader, by aspirant

    How to be a good leader, by aspirant

    Oyo State All Progressive Congress (APC) governorship aspirant Prof. Adeolu Akande has said only those with compassionate heart can provide purposeful leadership.

    He said the manifestations of bad leadership in the country meant that the people in leadership positions lack compassion.

    Akande, who, spoke at a leadership summit for Christian youths in the ancient Oyo, Oyo State said leaders must think of the people.

    He said every society have vulnerable members, which he identified as children, aged, disabled and the  poor who live below poverty level.

    He said the attitude of the leadership to these people in the design and implementation of government policies would determine whether those policies are pro-people or not.

    Akande said  leaders who are compassionate would support education policies that guarantee that children of the very poor in society have access to education.

    He said: “A compassionate leader will be bothered that some children would be denied education if school fees or levies are beyond the reach of the very poor in society.

    “Such a leader will support free education or policies that will make children of the very poor to access education. A leader who is not compassionate will see nothing wrong in such children not having access to education.”

    Akande explained that the disposition that detetmines whether government gives priorities to social services or focus on protects that would impact directly on the people depended on leader who are compassionate.

    Akande identified other ingredients of purposeful leadership to include vision, integrity, courage and communication skills.

    He explained that a leader without vision will either lead the people astray or stagnant in their  development aspirations.

    “A visionary leader must know where he is taking the people. He must see ahead of the people he leads and have clear ideas on how to take them to the desired destination,” he said.

    Akande said a leader must have integrity and his leadership must tell stories that guarantees the admiration and support of the people.”A leader must walk his talk. He must mean what he says.The people he leads must trust his judgement and pronouncements. His story must inspire and be assuring.”

    He said a leader must be courageous to lead the people to actualise his vision because many atimes,the people do not agree with where the leader is leading them.

    He added: ”The leader needs courage to walk his talk, having given proper thought to his vision for the society.”

    Akande cited the example of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, who introduced free education in Western Nigeria in 1955, despite widespread opposition and blackmail of political opponents. He said Awolowo stood his ground on free education, despite the electoral threat it posed to his party and political career.

    He added: “Today, Papa Awolowo is acknowledged for the transformation  free education brought to the people of western Nigeria.He is known today for free education more than anything else.

  • Let us end malaria for good

    Tawaii-Tawaii” is all you hear from every corner of every bedroom and every compound in my small neigbourhood somewhere in the Southeast of the River Niger. People are trying to get some sleep after a stressful day, but these tiny insects with wings and suckers won’t let them. The very least they can do is slap themselves anywhere they feel a slight movement, especially the ears.

    Hoping to kill these tormentors popularly known as mosquitoes or anwunta in Igbo. Almost every night, it is still the same old story. It has happened so often over the years, so much so that it is slowly becoming a very sad-and-sorry part of our sleep-routine. The mosquito-story is one story I can perfectly relate with, having been an eye and “ear” witness.

    It is a passionate story where a particular tiny creature torments, and in some cases, kills big creatures. It is a sad story, and I don’t like sad stories. Most people don’t, either. Hence, I have decided to stick to the original plan and write a thing or two on ending malaria for good.

    “End Malaria For Good” is one phrase some Nigerians might even laugh over. A phrase seemingly “too good to be true”. But I believe it is feasible. All it requires of us is just a little bit of enlightenment, once we let go of ignorance. There are so many things about mosquitoes and malaria that most Nigerians have little or no idea about, yet they show little or no interest about learning ways to deal with the problem. There’s this common belief that Naija people survive anything. But why settle for “survive” when you can “thrive”. Why? For us to end malaria for good, we have to let the people know exactly what to do and how to do it.

    We know from History how badly malaria dealt with Africans (Nigerians) from time immemorial. History gave us a clear briefing on how Nigerian children usually died mysteriously, albeit looking back; we now understand it was malaria doing the dirty job in most of those sad cases.

    History also gave us a briefing on how these tiny creatures made the earliest batch of Christian missionaries take to their heels, as they couldn’t stand the slaughter. When they ran back, it seemed at that point as though these tiny creatures were invincible. But thanks to the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century, thanks to the discovery of Quinine.

    The white men came back, and this time they brought the antidote with them, with which the mosquitoes could do little or no harm. The white took these drugs for both attack and defence. As time passed, we started using it as well. Now owing to the fact that science and technology kept advancing, Quinine was substituted with similar malarial drugs with much more efficacy.

    Then, these drugs were rare gemstones. Now, they are reasonably affordable (even free in some cases). Thus, just like the story of the Israelites and the snakes, where all who looked up to the bronze snake, lived. In like manner, anybody who takes Artemether-Lumefantrine (or similar malarial drugs) shall live, and not die.

    Now, how do we inform the people and end malaria for good? So far, the media has done a great job I must confess – from radio to television and print media. An average Nigerian knows almost anything on which malarial drugs to buy, and the dose, even without prescriptions. They have also heard of mosquito nets. But the average Nigerian is more concerned with the cure for malaria than he is, with its prevention. It makes me wonder if “prevention is still better than cure”.

    We would rather buy mosquito killers than clean our gutters and clear the environment. We would rather use the bush than use the closet. All these and more are the seemingly-insignificant-but-essentially-crucial things we must do if we must end malaria for good.

    We tend to neglect these crucial duties, and since everybody is doing it, it almost feels right. What the people need is a re-orientation, but this time we need to lay emphasis more on the “prevention” than on the “cure”. Television operas and radio dramas are few of the best tools to drive the point home. And the reason is simple: people connect with them easily. If we can have TV programmes that don’t just show drugs, but also show an environment that has become mosquito-free because of positive change in lifestyle, hence a resultant positive change in the state of the environment.

    Programmes that showcase people clearing up their homes, clearing their gutters, dumping refuse only in the right places, consciously deciding not to litter the streets like everybody else, and generally doing those simple little things that look like they mean nothing, but can make a big difference on the long run. And I’m quite sure that when this good news starts spreading, when the people start getting the point, the positive change becomes automatic.

    Of course, it’s an obvious fact when I say that no one individual has all the sides to the big picture of “ending malaria for good”.  I hopefully believe I just did my humble part by painting a small portion into this big picture. And believe me when I say I’m elated seeing the big-good-work Miral pharm is doing, getting all these pieces together, different views from different students.

    What a beautiful picture it would be when all the pieces are put together. I only hope they keep this fire burning, going beyond making and selling drugs, much more into harnessing ideas and enriching lives in the process. Sooner than later, we hope to sleep safe, without any “Tawaii-Tawaii”, because tiny creatures have gone missing. So help us God. Amen.

     

    Victor won first prize with this article in the 2017 Ravimal Essay Competition.

  • He was a good hubby, says Mosanya’s widow

    For the family of the Pa Adebayo Mosanya, it was a teary farewell as his remains were buried at the weekend.

    His wife, Victoria, to who he was married for over 60 years was inconsolable in the midst of family, friends and sympathisers.

    He was buried at 11:25am, after a service at his Agege, Lagos residence.

    Officiating Pastor Sunday Akande of the Christ Apostolic Church (CAC), in his sermon urged the gathering to live right, saying they would be judged by what they did while on earth.

    “Serve God and work hard. Everlasting life can only be secured if you have Jesus in your life,” he said.

    Mrs Mosanya described her late husband as a good man. “He was my father and husband. He was truthful and honest to me, he was never angry with me. Our years together were peaceful and loving. He loved his children and would always care for them. When I was pregnant, he was pregnant with me, and when I gave birth, he did also. He was the one that took care of me after every child birth, the only thing he could not do was to bath the children; but he knows how to do everything for me and his children.”

    She said her late husband taught their children to do good, obey instructions, and never be disobedient. “There was no issue in our marriage. As women came around him he was faithful to me and never carried women. When he fell sick, I never knew he was going to die; I will miss everything about him,” she said.

    Her first child, Mrs Oluwabunmi Willie-Desanya said her father was everything to her. “He was a great man and I am proud of him. He served God throughout his life. He is beautiful inside and outside. He sees positivity and loves everyone. He was a positive politician, led me to Christ and I would prefer to come back to this world through him,” she said.

  • Good governance in Kogi

    SIR: In these past 13 months, the Governor of Kogi State, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, and his team have tried to build and lay solid foundation that would guarantee that the flight of the state whose take-off had suffered years of man-made delay, takes off without further delay.

    We have seen the governor deliver on his electoral promises, especially in key areas of education, healthcare, infrastructure, youth and women empowerment, civil service and pension reforms.

    The administration has commenced the construction of roads in several communities across the state. Interestingly, the road projects are evenly spread across the three senatorial districts. It would also be interesting to note that the administration in its determination to ensure that all roads in the state are made motorable, promised to undertake the Egbe-Kabba Road which is a federal road. Lokoja, the state capital, is now wearing a befitting look as roads in the ancient town are receiving due attention with solar street lights and traffic light being fixed accordingly. The Ankpa township road and the long neglected Umomi-Idah Road are not left out. So are other roads critical to the socio-economic development of the state receiving attention.

    In the health sector, the state is simply going through a revolution as efforts are on to upgrade several state-owned health facilities with new ones also being contemplated. Equipment, including ambulances and personnel, are also being provided to boost healthcare delivery in the state.

    Security is one key area that has been accorded enormous support. It started with the procurement of over 100 well-equipped vehicles and several motorcycles that were distributed to security agencies in the state. The administration also ensures regular helicopter surveillance over the state to track down criminals. Recently, the governor gave a bite to the law on kidnapping as he led a team to pull down structures that harbour criminals. For once, the state is being made too hot for criminals and that way, the socio-economic prosperity of the state is being guaranteed.

    Yahaya Bello has been able to introduce a number of empowerment programmes aimed at ensuring that food is put on the table of many families. For instance, engaging corporate outfits to ensure that the state is kept clean is one of several initiatives as hundreds of unemployed youths have been engaged. The government has also employed agriculture to economically empower many.

    In the area of internally generated revenue, the administration has recorded landmark success. The IGR has really gone up and to sustain and improve on this, a number of youths have been recruited and an architectural masterpiece is now standing at the heart of the state capital as Revenue House.

    If there is single action that would ensure that posterity is fair to the governor, it is the ongoing reform in the civil service and pension matters.

    In its resolve to curb wastage in government and reduce cost of governance, the governor has kept a slim government. In all, the administration does not have up to 70 political appointees on its payroll.

    These past months, Alhaji Yahaya Bello has proved beyond doubt that he embodies the key essentials of a remarkable leader. He is decisive in taking tough decisions, has empathy guiding subordinates through challenges, he is focused; always planning ahead and, most importantly, his unquestionable commitment to changing the fortunes of his dear Kogi State. Obviously, there are going to be challenges. Each step the governor has taken so far has been reassuring and, of course, daring.

     

    • Ahmed Ododo,

    Kogi State Auditor-General for Local Government