Tag: Governor Ayo Fayose

  • Fayose to workers: Strike and lose your salaries

    Fayose to workers: Strike and lose your salaries

    Government workers in Ekiti State who embark on strike without following due process should be ready to lose their salaries during such industrial action, Governor Ayo Fayose has warned.

    Fayose gave the warning yesterday evening in Ado Ekiti while appearing on his monthly media chat, Meet Your Governor.

    He also denied awarding contracts for the construction of Erekesan Market, Airport and flyover to his children, family members and cronies.

    Fayose’s latest hard stance was coming on the heels of a two-day warning industrial action by primary school teachers last week to protest non-payment of September 2014 salaries and 2014 leave bonus.

    According to him, the state would henceforth divert salaries of striking workers to those ready to show concerns and understanding with the parlous economic situation of the state.

    He said: ”Since I came back, Ekiti is financially challenged. I have not hidden the financial position of the state from workers, particularly the teachers, because they are the set of people I have shown so much love for.

    “I celebrate them on annual basis. Even during my first term, people called me Teachers’ Governor due to my love for them.

    “But the strike they embarked on recently could have been resolved without any crisis if we had dialogued.

    “They said respect beget respect. Every worker in the state knew how much Ekiti takes after FAAC in Abuja because I used to lay it bare on the table.

    “We should also know that the people who are not salary earners must be taken care of. We can’t be paying salary and neglect other people from having access to facilities like good roads, good water supply and this market I just flagged.

    “So, I enjoin the workers to show some level of understanding that we have to balance the two, I mean paying salary as the money comes and also help the masses as well.

    “There is nowhere in the world where the entire budgetary provision will be centre around recurrent expenditure.”

    On the recent visit to his Osun State counterpart, Rauf Aregbesola, Fayose said: “Governor Aregbesola is my very good friend. It is only in Nigeria where two friends in different political parties won’t be free to greet each other.

    “My visit to governor Aregbesola is in Yoruba’s interest.

    “We have to forget about our political differences and build Yoruba into a huge political force in Nigeria.”

  • Ekiti APC faults Adesina’s JSC appointment

    Ekiti APC faults Adesina’s JSC appointment

      Facebook  Google+  LinkedIn

    • Accuses Fayose of committing another ‘illegality’

    The Ekiti State Chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has kicked against the appointment of former General Secretary of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Dele Adesina (SAN), as member of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC).

    The party said the appointment has added to an alleged “long list of illegalities and constitutional breaches” committed by Governor Ayo Fayose since assuming office on October 16, 2014.

    APC Publicity Secretary Taiwo Olatunbosun said in a statement yesterday that Adesina’s appointment was a violation of the constitution, which stated that “no person can be appointed into the Judicial Service Commission twice”.

    “Adesina was first appointed as a member of the Judicial Service Commission by Governor Kayode Fayemi in 2012, and against the law, he was again appointed by Governor Fayose as the Chairman of the commission in 2015,” Olatunbosun explained.

    “By the provision of Section 200(3) of the 1999 Constitution, no person can be appointed to State Civil Service Commission, Judicial Service Commission or State Independent Electoral Commission twice.

    “ Adesina (SAN) was appointed by Fayemi to serve in the State Judicial Service Commission, now Fayose has re-appointed him to the same office.

    “This is illegal and unconstitutional. This provision of the law is an offshoot of Sections 197,198 and 199 of the 1999 Constitution.”

    He added that by this action, Fayose had breached the constitution for the umpteenth time.

    “It is unfortunate and regrettable that a senior advocate of Adesina’s stature could allow temporary allure of office to take precedence over professionalism and defence of the provisions of the constitution, his very constituency from where he made money and earned his fame,” he said.

  • APC slams Fayose for N250m Dubai trip

    APC slams Fayose for N250m Dubai trip

    •Send your evidence to EFCC, says govt

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ekiti State has accused Governor Ayo Fayose of splashing N250 million on a private trip to Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE).

    The party, which claimed that Fayose left Nigeria on Sunday, expressed shock that such a princely amount could be spent on a holiday at a time workers were being owed.

    But the government challenged the APC to send any evidence it has to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), saying the trip was a private one and at no cost to the government.

    Describing the alleged Christmas Dubai trip as “a reckless insensitivity to the plight of workers, the opposition described it as “the height of irresponsibility by the governor to travel abroad while state workers live in miserable conditions”.

    APC’s Publicity Secretary Taiwo Olatunbosun, in a statement yesterday, said the Dubai trip was the height of insensitivity and wickedness for a governor calling himself people’s governor.

    “It is worrisome that the governor prepared and collected travelling allowances for 10 aides, who he claimed were to travel with him, but only one eventually did.

    “The Dubai trip confirmed our claim that Fayose is taking Ekiti money out to the Middle East country whenever he receives allocation from the Federal Government.

    “Fayose just visited local governments where he lied to workers that the state is broke whereas he has appropriated N250 million for his needless trip and those of ghost aides after setting aside another N250 million for his monthly personal security vote.

    “This is a governor, who accused his colleagues of extravagance through foreign trips.

    “Fayose conned Ekiti workers by paying 10 per cent of their monthly basic salary, which translated to about N700 to most workers while he shamelessly boasted he had paid bonus,” he said.

    Olatunbosun added that although he collected over N9 billion for bailout to clear salary arrears, pensions and allowances of ex-office holders, the money was allegedly diverted to other purposes.

    “He owes Ekiti workers three months, pensioners four months and has not paid severance and furniture allowances of ex-office holders.”

    The APC chieftain called on the EFCC and Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) to invite the commissioner for Finance, accountant general and auditor general for interrogation.

    But the Commissioner for Information Lanre Ogunsuyi described the allegation as ludicrous.

    Ogunsuyi said: “In the first place, the governor is on holiday and he is not travelling anywhere as the governor but as Mr. Peter Ayodele Fayose as any other worker, who had worked in the last one year.

    “He is on a private trip and the state is not responsible for it. Every worker in the state has been paid for October, unless the APC has a different calendar. The outstanding months are November and December.

    “The bailout funds have been applied as instructed by the CBN and a statement of return has been filed.”

  • Fayose: In his usual fashion

    Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose chose to dress down and was dressed down. He was dressed in a pair of Jeans trousers and a T-shirt when he appeared at the House of Assembly to present the Appropriation Bill on December 8.

    “The world watched in disbelief as Fayose stormed the House of Assembly in casual dress,” said a statement by the Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Taiwo Olatunbosun. He described the governor’s dressing as “uncultured”, adding that it “defies decorum.”

    In response, the House Committee Chairman on Information, Gboyega Aribisogan, reportedly wondered: “And what has what Governor Fayose wears got to do with governance?” His defence of Fayose was perhaps predictable. They are both members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) which is in power in the state. The defender also wondered why the opposition “turned themselves into Governor Fayose’s advisers on mode of dressing and public presentation.”

    So, Fayose’s informal dressing was considered appropriate for a formal ceremony by those who don’t understand the idea of “dressing properly for the occasion”.

    The APC’s statement continued: “More shocks came when the governor grabbed the gavel and started conducting a mock sitting. The worst was the quality of English by the governor who said: ‘those who doesn’t support the quick passage of the budget should say ‘Aye’ or ‘Nay’, to which both gallery and members hooted ‘Aye’.”

    Fayose’s dramatic use of a gavel to symbolically “pass” the budget into law after presenting the proposal to the lawmakers amounted to “a breach of protocol,” the party said. The governor’s action was described as a “flagrant disregard of the rule of law and constituted authority”. According to the APC, it “violates law and order and abuses power”.   This account sounded exaggerated. But Aribisogan’s reaction appeared to corroborate it.   Speaking on behalf of the 26-member House of Assembly controlled by the PDP, he told journalists in Ado-Ekiti that the lawmakers owed their positions to Fayose.  He was quoted as saying: “Is it our fault that the APC does not have a single member in the House of Assembly? … The reality that those in the APC must face is that if they are waiting for us to confront Governor Fayose on issues of governance, they will wait till eternity.”

    This hero worship must explain not only Fayose’s superiority complex, but also the legislators’ inferiority complex. The picture shows a little tin god and men of straw.

  • Ekiti lawmakers pass Appropriation Bill

    Ekiti lawmakers pass Appropriation Bill

    Ekiti State lawmakers yesterday passed the 2016 Appropriation Bill into law, six days after Governor Ayo Fayose presented it.

    Last Wednesday, Fayose presented a budget proposal of N67 billion.

    The budget was passed after the chairman of the Committee on Finance and Appropriation, Samuel Jeje, presented his report yesterday.

    Deputy Leader Adeniran Alagbada moved the motion for the adoption of the report, which was unanimously approved by all the lawmakers.

    Speaker Kola Oluwawole said the budget was passed quickly because the lawmakers were involved from the beginning.

    Two other bills- State Kidnap and Terrorism (Prohibition) Bill 2015 and Office of Public Defender Bill 2015- were also passed.

    Few hours after the budget bill was passed, it was brought to Fayose at the Executive Chambers of the Governor’s Office for his assent.

    Others bills signed by the governor include: State Regency Bill; State 2015 Revised Appropriation Bill; State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Repeal Bill; State Office of the Defenders Bill and Kidnap and Terrorism Prohibition Bill 2016.

    Fayose directed Oluwawole to send copies of the budget to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission for monitoring.

     

  • Fayose: The cart and the horse

    Those who think Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose is pursuing a flight of fancy concerning his plan to build a multi-billion naira airport in the land must be having a rethink, following news of activities to realise the project. The site at Aso Ayegunle village in Ado Ekiti is being cleared for commencement of construction.

    But Fayose is putting the cart before the horse, which says a lot about his state of mind and the state of his administration. The land-owning Iwajo Family is disturbed that Fayose is doing things in the wrong order.  A report said the family “is demanding compensation on the economic trees on the land ‘in line with the law of the land’.”  According to the report, the family “claimed to have been on the land for over 500 years, saying the land was not suitable because it is a cocoa belt, which spreads to Igbemo-Ekiti in Irepodun/Ifelodun Local Government Area and never a virgin land.”

    A statement issued by the family gives the impression that Fayose is continuing with pre-construction moves with impunity. Of course, it is no news that the governor enjoys acting with impunity, and continues to promote a culture of impunity.

    The statement, signed by the family head, Chief Moses Ojo, the secretary, Osho Olorunfemi and Chief Italohun Fadahunsi, said: “Ekiti is known to be a cocoa-producing state and this site is renowned for cocoa production. To the best of our knowledge, any land being acquired by the government, it is expected that the government should settle the owner of the land and property therein before moving to site.”

    It added: “If eventually the government sticks to its decision to site the project on this spot, there should be compensation and adequate notice given to allow those who have repayable crops to harvest their crops before moving to the site.”

    The picture speaks of arbitrariness on Fayose’s part, as well as a possible contempt for consultation. It is apt to wonder how Fayose reached a decision on the use of the particular site for his airport project. Also, if his choice was informed by any thought, did he think about the issues raised by the family?

    In a reflection of how Fayose’s government thinks, the Commissioner for Works and Chairman of the Airport Project Implementation Committee, Kayode Osho, reportedly “assured the people that adequate compensation would be paid to the owners of the land and economic trees.”  According to the report, “the commissioner, however, was non-committal on when the compensation will be paid.”

    There seems to be confusion about the place of the cart and the place of the horse. The Fayose administration cannot place the two correctly, in their correct places. It may not be incorrect to say that the government needs concrete correction.

     

  • Ekiti: The conquistador at work

    Ekiti: The conquistador at work

    Governor Ayo Fayose sealed his conquest of Ekiti State with a victory parade through the streets of the capital, Ado Ekiti, last Friday, with a declaration and a warning.

    Declaration:  “I am a man destined for greatness and with the power of God, nobody can bring me down. I have defeated my enemies (emphasis added) during elections, and now I defeated impeachment.”

    Warning:   “Whoever thinks he could impeach his governor and the Deputy for him to become the Acting Governor always ends being destroyed. You have to learn from history. Those who impeached me the other time have died politically today.”

    Fayose’s election on the platform of the PDP in June 2014 was the first in a long line of the conquests that have now established him as a modern-day conquistador.  He conquered the incumbent governor, Dr  Kayode Fayemi, and the ruling ACN.

    But that stunning conquest was not enough.  At his inauguration, fresh from taking a solemn oath to serve all the people of Ekiti faithfully, to be governor for all and not just his supporters, he vowed to drive out the ACN out of the South West, its traditional stronghold in the short term, and thereafter out of Nigeria.

    As rule, conquerors don’t like sharing territory or power.   It is everything or nothing.  But here was Fayose, PDP governor, facing the daunting prospect of having to cohabit with a 27-member State Assembly, all of them elected on the platform of the ACN before it fused with other parties to morph into the APC.

    By sundry inducements, he won seven of the 26 to his side.  Bolstered by hired ruffians pretending to be members of the assembly and cheered on by a rented crowd, the seven promptly “impeached” the Speaker of the Assembly, Dr Adewale Omirin, elected one of their own to replace him, and proceeded to exercise the authority of the legislative branch.

    The police dutifully provided cover for the proceedings and, together with Fayose’s people – truck drivers, motor-cycle taxi operators, truck drivers, motor-park touts, artisans, petty traders, the usual crowd, you know – barricaded the precincts to keep away bona fide members of the Assembly.

    If you cannot persuade a person to be your friend, the Italian philosopher Niccolo Machievelli laid it down six centuries ago in his manual on how to win, exercise and retain power, make it impossible for that person to be your adversary.

    This piece of wisdom probably came naturally to Fayose, who has no patience with book learning, which he regards as the opium of the elite.  He made Ekiti unsafe for the 19 legislators who would not bend to his will.  They fled to the safer and more hospitable clime of Lagos, there to continue the struggle through the judicial process to regain their place in the Ekiti Assembly, and thereafter use that platform to impeach Fayose who had had treated that institution with such blazing contempt.

    They never returned.  He mobilized his supporters to blockade highways leading into Ado Edo Ekiti to ensure that they could not return to the city under any guise or disguise.  And in case they somehow slipped through the cordon, they would run smack into another band of Fayose’s enforcers from whom they could expect no mercy

    Score that not just as a coup but as another conquest for Fayose – conquest of the legislature.  But even that would be understating the matter:  It was a victory against the right of free movement of persons and lawful goods across the territory of Nigeria or any portion thereof

    There remained that other pesky third branch, the judiciary. Down the ages, no self-respecting conquistador has ever allowed it to function without interference, much less one marked for greatness by Providence, and against whom all weapons fashioned by the enemy will fail.  So, the judiciary had to be conquered, too.

    That turned out to be the easiest task on the conquistador’s agenda.

    Set your enforcers on the hallowed chambers of the court house in the state capital to harass, intimidate and bully, roughen up and physically assault its officers, rend their robes and tear up court documents.  Instill fear in them, those court officials in ermined raiments and black robes; primal fear, from which the police cannot deliver them.

    The heavens did not fall.  Rather it was the court officials that fell, and with them the machinery of justice in Ekiti State.  Score that as yet another one for the conquistador:  conquest of the judiciary.

    Nor were these Fayose’s only conquests.

    He conquered accountability.  He claimed to have sunk close to a billion Naira on, of all things, an “integrated poultry project.”  The scheme did not produce a single egg; yet, he could not be called to account, just as he has not had to account for operating the exchequer without lawful authority.

    He conquered truth, by knowingly deploying falsehood so readily and so often that can no longer distinguish between actuality and his own fabrications

    He conquered honour.  “Call me a bastard if Buhari ever becomes president of Nigeria,” he said during the election campaign.  Buhari took office nearly two weeks ago, but Fayose is yet to change his name.

    He conquered dissent.  By their support, he said during his latest victory lap, his enforcers had proved that “Ekiti will continue to speak with one voice.”  Fayose’s voice.

    He conquered and forced into a shameful silence or abject capitulation traditional rulers and elders, the custodians, if they are true to their station, of the mores, the value system of society.

    Every one of these conquests was undergirded by Fayose’s  earlier conquest of the rule of law and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, with the active support of the Jonathan Administration and the PDP, the deluded holdovers of which have been threatening lately to resist any attempt to undermine “democracy” and the rule of law and all that in Ekiti.

    Fayose even conquered the most fundamental of decencies –the respect indeed reverence, that each person owes his or her mother’s privacy.  Just to score a political point, he told the whole  world that his mother suffered from an affliction of an intimate kind that is rarely mentioned in traditional society outside family circles and even there only in whispers.

    In sum, he has conquered all that is noble and decent and of good report.

    All that remains for Fayose the Conquistador is to conquer himself.  Unless and until he does that, all his vaunted conquests will vanish before his very eyes like rainbow gold.  The monsters he has spent his entire political life creating and nurturing may well devour him.

  • Putting an end to  the Ekiti conundrum

    Putting an end to the Ekiti conundrum

     But he should need no telling now that President Muhammadu Buhari is no Goodluck Jonathan nor can the police and the security services, who were his real bulwark,  any longer play deaf and dumb to his illegalities

    Now that the possibility of the G19 impeaching Governor Ayo Fayose has receded into history, despite his serial illegalities, it should be time to revisit my article of April 19, 2015.  Titled: ‘Ayo Fayose –Before it is too late’ – it was the culmination of an introspection into the decade plus political crisis that has engulfed the state and made nonsense of its development. The result is that Ekiti has regressed even more than some parts of the country where guns had been booming for years. We have had an emergency administration declared, had a one day governor, just as there had been murders and attempted murders, linked to politics. On the positive side, we have had citizens, and others from outside the state who, in the relatively saner intervals, invested billions, especially in the hotels and tourism sub-sector. Today, they must be ruing the day they decided to invest in Ekiti as clients have drained out as a result of the rolling crisis. When I wrote the article, there was no way I could have thought things would get so bad ten individuals could be kidnapped in Ekiti in years, not to talk of within a space of two weeks, as we saw recently.

    I did not stop at just writing the article  but went ahead to contact, not less than 15 highly regarded Ekiti  leaders  and distinguished  individuals , whose names I need not mention here, to help in facilitating peace between the warring parties for the sake of  our people, and the development of the state.  One direct result of these contacts was the joint meeting, called by Chief Deji Fasuan, of the Ekiti Elders Committee and the rump of the Committee for the creation of Ekiti state. Aare Afe Babalola who I did not contact, later called another Elders meeting which, unfortunately  got stalemated.  From that point on, the pugilists were left to their own devices but with the swearing in of the new PDP controlled House of Assembly this past week, impeaching Ayo Fayose by the G19 has now become an obvious impossibility.

    But it will be the very height of illusion to think that our problems are over. In the article under reference, I reminded Governor Ayo Fayose of the fate that became President Taylor of Liberia and went on to say that given the Supreme Court decision, I will candidly advise that a consensus be reached that governor Fayose should run his term. I suggested  he should, in turn, climb down from his high horse and apologise  to Ekiti people for his serial illegalities and, henceforth,  rule Ekiti in a civilized manner. I said he should do everything to return peace to Ekiti and that on the other hand, the G.19 should drop the impeachment process in the full knowledge that four years is not a life time. I went on to say, among other things, that for genuine peace, the governor should pay the G19’s outstanding salaries and allowances, ensure that normalcy promptly returns to the state House of Assembly as well as pay the outstanding salaries of the officials of the previous administration. I then concluded by saying that the governor should not make the mistake of seeing himself as a sole administrator but should rather, let Ekiti take centre stage in all he does. I did not fail to add that though I have been his constant critic, the time has come, to put a closure to all that for the sake of Ekiti. It is time for the two parties to sheath their swords, I pleaded.

    We are now at an opportune time for Fayose to seek the path of peace since any  fear of his impeachment has evaporated. Both now, and at his first coming, one of his biggest mistakes, which led to disastrous consequences at his first coming, was his undue reliance on federal authorities, especially Presidents who were themselves, masters of impunity. With that umbilical cord, he perpetrated, and got away with too many things. But he should need no telling now that President Muhammadu Buhari is no Goodluck Jonathan nor can the police and the security services, who were his real bulwark,  any longer play deaf and dumb to his illegalities. He now has to play by the rules and should constantly remember that it was a PDP controlled House of Assembly that impeached him at his first coming. He  must now, willy nilly, play according to the dictates of the Nigerian constitution. Governor Fayose must now begin genuine governance which has been in total abeyance since he became governor. And in this, he already has his job cut out.

    He must set out, post haste, to cashier his teeming thugs,  local as well as the alleged elements of the Niger Delta Volunteer Force, retrieve all the guns he generously gave them, and turn into the gutters the drums of concentrated acid with which they were armed. He must ensure that these characters are fully paid, lest he creates another version of Boko Haram that will make life unbearable for both state and country as we have seen in the North Eastern part of the country. He must handle this task with maximum dispatch if we want to rid Ekiti of kidnapping and armed robbery which the present circumstances have birthed and encouraged. Ekiti can ill afford any of these crimes. He must equally turn attention to his army of adulating young men/women for whom he must now provide productive jobs as  the devil finds jobs for idle hands.

    He must fully realise that the hard task of governance beckons. If he has any developmental blue print for the state, this will be the time to bring it out as the  omnibus ‘stomach infrastructure’ camouflage, for which he created a directorate, will  suffice only for festivities but certainly not sufficient to answer the critical questions of development or of  a decent daily survival.  He cannot leave our elderly to their own devices,  forever claiming there is no money. We all knew that his predecessor, out of the same paucity of funds, was paying N5, 000 monthly stipend to about 20, 000 elderly citizens which he cancelled on assumption of office. There must be something to replace this welfare scheme just as development must be seen in other sectors of the state economy – education, health, agriculture, etc.

    For the APC, it is time for us  to also sit back, and clinically interrogate, our problems with a view to arriving at  a rapprochement. It is not strange having two or more competing groups within the same party. Though dysfunctional, as we  have seen , time and again,  in  the  Lagos PDP,  the  key thing is we must not relate like enemies. The more popular group will always emerge victorious at state congresses and that should, ideally, settle the matter. Political contestation, inter as well as intra party, is a constant feature of democracy. I have said it before, and it can still bear a repetition: APC’s problems in Ekiti are only skin deep and will be resolved to everybody’s satisfaction.

    Our politicians, across board, should in view of what Ekiti has lost and suffered, honestly moderate their antagonistic relationships. If truly the interest of Ekiti is our focus, there is no reason our personal interests should predominate and I do not think any of us can  claim to love Ekiti more than the other.

    In conclusion, for all round  peace and harmony to endure in Ekiti, our elders must tread the narrow path, be  always objective and not be timid or afraid to talk truth to power.  Failure to do these has been our nemesis. They must be peace facilitators, not partisans. This they can do by ensuring that those in authority are not allowed to become demi gods just as the opposition should be kept on a leach to ensure that their activities are kept strictly within democratic limits. That we need peace in Ekiti, after a decade of self-inflicted crises, is self evident. Let us all work towards it.

  • Impeachment notice: farce and politics in Ekiti

    Impeachment notice: farce and politics in Ekiti

    In the continuing saga of Governor Ayo Fayose’s impeachment, it is hard to tell who enjoys the most support: the governor, House of Assembly Speaker Adewale Omirin, or the constitution. Mr Fayose was last week served impeachment notice by 19 members of the House of Assembly led by Dr Omirin. The governor has done his best to evade direct service, and has instead tried to mobilise public sympathy. He argues that the 19 lawmakers, all members of the All Progressives Congress (APC), were attempting to use the tool of impeachment to secure what they lost through the ballot box.

    Does the governor have the people’s support? There is no doubt that his supporters, most of whom have been publicly identified as trade union members, artisans, and office holders, are very vocal and troublesome and have loudly proclaimed their support for the governor and bitterness against the 19 lawmakers and the APC. These supporters have taken to the street and are constantly in the news, presenting a facade of huge and undeniable support for the paranoid Mr Fayose. There is, however, no doubt that over the months, as the governor displayed greater imbecility, the angry crowd of supporters, though still vociferous and implacable, had thinned out.

    Dr Omirin also commands a huge and perhaps discrete following, first from a majority of lawmakers, and second from those pained by the precipitous decline of public morals and standards in this state of great learning. The Speaker’s educated supporters select and calibrate their responses, preferring the rule of law and due process. They naturally face the dilemma of seeming to be either docile in the face of Mr Fayose’s monstrous behaviour, or are in reality not too bothered whichever way the pendulum would swing.

    The third force in the saga is of course the constitution, which at the moment seems pristinely alone and isolated. No matter what support both Mr Fayose and Dr Omirin get from their partisans, the constitution is at the heart of the quarrel and controversy, and will probably be the deciding factor. Who between the governor and the Speaker has acted constitutionally? And what does the constitution say about the impeachment? In the view of Femi Falana, a lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), the impeachment notice served by the 19 lawmakers is in order and has precedence. The notice, anchored on eight constitutional breaches against the governor, appeared to have been inspired by the continuing buffoonery of the governor, including dealing with seven lawmakers as the legal and properly constituted House of Assembly under the leadership of the usurper, Dele Olugbemi.

    It does not, however, appear that too many people are paying attention to what the constitution says. Politics predominates, and decisions and actions are determined by whom the partisans support. While Ekiti and Nigerians wait to see whether the Chief Judge would set up an investigative panel as directed by the House of Assembly under Speaker Omirin, some lawyers cite a judgement of the Supreme Court, referenced in the case of the impeachment of former Oyo State governor, Rashidi Ladoja, indicating that impeachment notice could not be valid except it proceeded from a sitting in the legislative chamber. But what if the lawmakers were barred from the legislative chamber by violent groups, such as clearly happened in Ekiti last week?

    It is not certain how the impeachment matter would be resolved. But if the farcical performance of Mr Olugbemi, leader of the Group of Seven who pretends to be the Speaker, is anything to go by, Ekiti is in trouble. Mr Olugbemi speaks very bad English, could hardly read his own prepared statement disputing Dr Omirin’s impeachment notice, his brief remarks were redolent with so many shibboleths, and he obviously knew little law and legislative practices. It was thus puzzling to see the governor embrace such appalling farce rather than concoct his own farce for which he is eminently gifted.

  • Impeachment: Fayose’s supporters block assembly

    Impeachment: Fayose’s supporters block assembly

    Scores of supporters of  Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose yesterday blocked all access roads leading to the state House of Assembly complex in a bid to prevent any impeachment proceedings.

    They arrived at the vicinity as early as 8a.m. and staged a protest around the complex.

    Their action was consequent upon a rumour that the 19 All Progressives Congress (APC) lawmakers, who form the majority in the assembly, would storm the complex to sit and impeach Fayose from office.

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) loyalists stormed the assembly area singing pro-Fayose songs and lashing at the APC lawmakers for harbouring plans to remove the governor, who they claimed “is innocent of the impeachable offences”.

    Backed by some government and party officials, they used a government-owned Ashok Leyland luxury bus to block the access road – Saliu Adeoti Road – to prevent the opposition lawmakers from gaining access to the complex.

    Deputy Governor Kolapo Olusola; former House of Assembly Speaker, Olatunji Odeyemi and Special Assistant on Information, Youth and Sports, Lanre Ogunsuyi, were on hand to support the protesters.

    About nine Toyota Hilux vans belonging to the police and Department of State Services (DSS), conveying heavily armed operatives, were parked at the two main entrances leading to the assembly complex.

    The PDP members later turned the blockade into a roadshow, singing and dancing to music at the gate of the House of Assembly Service Commission.

    They were prevented from coming near the new assembly complex by the battle-ready and stern-looking security men, drafted there to maintain law and order.

    Many of the protesters, who were weary of singing and dancing and could no longer withstand the heat of the sun, sat under canopies placed in front of the old assembly complex.

    Addressing reporters on the purpose of the blockade, Ogunsuyi said Ekiti people were ready to take their destiny in their hands by fighting for the mandate they gave to Fayose on June 21 last year.

    The governor’s aide insisted that all the actions of the APC lawmakers reeked of illegality and impunity, saying Dr. Adewale Omirin was no longer the Speaker and lacked the power to preside over the assembly.

    Ogunsuyi added that Omirin was already in court challenging his impeachment, saying he could not be laying claim to the position.

    He added that the APC lawmakers were desecrating the rule of law and the constitution.

    He said: “The new Nigeria, which President Goodluck Jonathan and Gen. Muhammadu Buhari campaigned for is the one that would respect the Rule of Law.

    “With this convergence, you can see that the people are standing by their governor. They are ready to defend their mandate.

    “Nobody asked Omirin and other APC lawmakers not to come to the Assembly. They only decided to abdicate their duties since last year November 17.

    “Impeachment procedure does not start and end with the Assembly alone. The judiciary is involved. So, this plan is highly condemnable.

    “We want to emphasise that they are welcome as long as they are concerned about making laws for the progress of the state. But if it was meant to come and impeach Governor Fayose, we won’t allow that”.

    Ogunsuyi, however, said the governor as the leader would continue to wave the olive branch to the opposition lawmakers for Ekiti to remain in peace and harmony.

    He said: “We want some measures of decorum in Ekiti. We are not proud of the era when we had three governors within a week. We want a stable government and we will continue to pursue this for Ekiti to be at peace.”

    Odeyemi advised the APC lawmakers to put the interest of the state above personal or partisan interests, warning that breakdown of law and order was an ill-wind that won’t blow any good.

    He said: “The entire issue calls for concerns. As a former legislator, I am quite aware of the rudiment of impeachment process. But far from this, the issue of the news any impeachment will bring to Ekiti’s credibility  is uppermost in my mind.”