Tag: Green Chamber

  • Reps seek bailout for automotive industry

    Reps seek bailout for automotive industry

    In a bid to avert total collapse of the automotive industry, the House of Representatives Thursday called for measures that will provide financial and bailout assistance for the sector.

    To this end the Green Chamber has set up an ad-hoc committee to interact with relevant stakeholders in the sector with a view to address the problems faced by the industry.

    The committee is also to investigate the inability of the industry to access foreign exchange from the Central Bank of Nigeria.

    The resolution was sequel to the passage of a motion sponsored by Hon. Saheed Akinade-Fijabi (APC, Oyo) on the need for financial and bailout assistance for automobile industry in Nigeria,

    The lawmaker while arguing the motion noted that industrial growth contributes to a nation’s development in terms of increased foreign earnings, job creation and achieving other macro-economic objectives.

    According to him, most developed countries “depend on industrial development to revolutionize their economic powers through manufacturing of goods for local consumption and exportation of same to other countries as a booster to their foreign trade for earnings”.

    He said economic recession is not peculiar to Nigeria, adding developed countries at one time or the other witnessed economic recession but helped their indigenous automobile to survive the recession.

    His words: “The US government considering the importance of this sector came to the rescue of their indigenous automobile industries like GM and Chrysler through provision of bailout and other incentive, including government patronage.

    “Nigeria had a breakthrough into automobile manufacturing industries with the commissioning of Innoson motors, being her first indigenous vehicle manufacturing company in year 2010 to cut down the country’s dependence on importation of vehicle.”

    The lawmaker further said: “Investigation revealed that Innoson motors, known for importation of basic motor components, including engines, from abroad and assemble them locally, is shutting down business due to foreign exchange issues borne out of economic recession.

    “If this company is allowed to shut down, while government folds its arms, it will have negative effect on our economy in the area of job loss, loss of local and foreign revenue.”

    While supporting the motion, a member, Hon. Hassan Sale this is need to support local industries.

    “Even if we cannot give the bailout, we should support and encourage them. We must make effort to support indigenous companies”.

    When the Deputy Speaker, Yussuff Lasun called for a vote on the motion it was supported by many members.

  • Integrity on trial in the Green Chamber

    Integrity on trial in the Green Chamber

    THE House of Representatives had yet to recover from a sex scandal when it ran into the budget padding scandal. The latest scandal came as a shock to many Nigerians, given that the House has always touted its will to fight corruption in line with the anti-corruption stance of the Muhammadu Buhari-led administration.

    Since the nation returned to democracy in 1999, the different sessions of the House of Representatives have thrown up different controversies. The Sixth House of Representatives under Patricia Etteh buckled under the House renovation scandal that culminated in her removal as Speaker. Her successor, Dimeji Bankole, got his own bite of the bug after he was accused of inflating the cost of cars and questionable loans up to the tune of N10 billion. The case was taken up by the anti-graft agencies.

    The scandal in the Seventh House under Aminu Tambuwal consisted of political turmoil caused by contending claims of Speakership and the political shenanigans that lingered.

    But the current scandal in the Eighth House probably takes the cake. A smouldering allegation of budget padding has gradually turned into a conflagration that threatens to consume all, following the removal of the Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations, Abdulmumin Jibrin.

    The scandal has since morphed to a level where Rep members speak in embarrassment at the mention of their membership of the Green Chamber.

    The allegations

    On July 20, 2016, Jibrin addressed a press conference in room 0.19 at the Reps side of the National Assembly where he announced the resignation of his committee chairmanship. At the same time, the Speaker, Hon. Yakubu Dogara, announced at Plenary that Jibrin had been relieved of his position and replaced.

    In the wake of the passage of the 2016 budget, Jibrin was accused of allocating 20 projects worth N4.3 billion to himself without the consent of committee members. A separate N40 billion worth of projects was said to have been surreptitiously allocated to the leaderships of the appropriations committees of both chambers of the National Assembly which was allegedly shared without the consent or knowledge of other members.

    Irked that Dogara said he was sacked on the basis on “sundry acts of misconduct, incompetence, total disregard for his colleagues and abuse of the budgetary process, among others,” Hon. Jibrin alleged that Dogara and three other principal officers superintended the ‘paddings’ or ‘insertions’ in the 2016 budget of sums that that ran into billions. Only 10 of 96 House committees, said the former appropriations committee chair, “inserted N284 billion into the 2016 budget.”

    Jibrin also claimed that Dogara sited a federal government project on his farm in Nassarawa State, among other allegations.

    Dogara has debunked all the accusations.

     Since the original allegation, Jibrin has continued to spit fire. At intervals, the lawmaker issued unnerving breakdown of the alleged illicit appropriation. The ‘revelations’ took up eager media space with mainly negative comments flooding the social media.

    Nigerians expressed disappointment in the legislature with many calling for thorough investigation of the matter. House members have also expressed anger and frustration at the negative perception by the public, pointing out a deep sense of shame that encompasses them whenever they visit their constituencies.

    Jibrin had also approached anti-graft agencies with information to help them nail the “quartet” of offenders and others adjudged to have helped in padding the budget.

    An internal affair of the House?

    Different views have been expressed on the issue. On July 28, federal lawmakers from Gombe State swung to the side of the Speaker. They claimed that it was an internal matter. The North Central, North West, North East as well as Ekiti State caucuses were all on the same page with Gombe, saying the House should be allowed to exhaust its internal mechanism before external bodies got involved.

    Members of the Committee on Appropriations, led by the Deputy Chair, Chris Azubogu, in a briefing said that the matter was an internal one that could not be investigated by external agencies. A self-styled group, the Transparency Group, also came up with its position that the issue had grown beyond the House and external agencies should step in to investigate the budget padding allegation.

    A coalition of Media and Civil Society groups called Africa Media Roundtable Initiative, however, advised Jibrin and other aggrieved lawmakers that rather than take the matter to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) or Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Crimes Commission (ICPC), they should proceed to court.

    The issue has, at the moment, snowballed. Dogara, the Deputy Speaker, Yussuff Lasun, the Chief Whip, Alhassan Ado Doguwa, and the Minority Leader, Leo Ogor, were expected to heed the summons of the Special Investigation Panel set up by the Acting Inspector General of Police, Ibrahim Idris. They were to state their role in the alleged padding of the 2016 budget. Anti-graft agencies have also been alerted and are waiting to swoop.

    The matter took a new turn when Jibrin further accused the Speaker of inducing members with money to sway them. First, it was $20,000 for pro-Dogara members to address the press. Then it was $25,000 for members to sign a vote of confidence register. The main facilitator of the inducement, said Jibrin, was the Deputy Chief of Staff to the Speaker, CID Maduabum. But the latter refuted the claim, saying that it was a figment of Jibrin’s imagination.

    “I wish to state that I did not at any time meet or hand over any money of any sort to any member of the House Appropriations Committee,” Maduabum said. “This accusation is not only a lie but pure fiction; a figment of his imagination. It is true that he loves mentioning my name, but is he so unintelligent not to notice a pattern? Hon. Abonta disagrees with him on national television, he immediately adds his name in a petition to EFCC; Hon. Jagaba grants an interview against him, he adds his name in the charge sheet which he carries about.

    “The Appropriations Committee members disown him, he immediately alleges inducement of $20,000; the whole House rises against him, then immediately everyone is given $25,000 each. Can he not see that no one needs to be induced when he is on a one-man riot squad to denigrate all members of the House and pull down the institution of the National Assembly? Once again, let me re-state that the Hon. Speaker, Rt. Hon. Dogara Yakubu, did not give me or anyone any money to give to any member of the House of Representatives.

    “This charge, as usual, exists in the demented and diseased imagination of the drowning Abdulmumin who is desperately grasping at every straw in his deception, campaign of calamity, demagoguery and propaganda which he has unleashed on innocent public officers whose sole offence is that they fatally misjudged Hon. Abdulmumin’s instability of character and unsuitability to hold public office.”

    A source who would not be identified said Jibrin might have chewed more than he bargained for by the tactics employed to fight his removal as chairman of a committee. “This will definitely consume Jibrin because, while the House cannot expel him, it can use internal mechanism to discipline him. Presently, he is the lone voice calling for the House to reconvene so that the matter can be resolved.

    “This is to show that he is all alone. Besides, he is trying to play a sentimental one on President Buhari by playing up the anti-corruption fight. What I want to let Nigerians know is that President Buhari is not a novice to the antics of politicians because this same Jibrin made a promise to him, which he failed to keep. I don’t want to say more on that until the right time.”

    Other lawmakers like the Chairman, Basic Education, Zakari Mohammed, who were alleged to have aided the Speaker in the padding, took turns to defend themselves. Mohammed said his hands were clean and dared Jibrin to make good his threat to take the matter to court.

    Can Dogara be removed?

    This is the question on the lips of many. The likely answer is that a removal would be difficult in the circumstance. A cumulative number of 240 members of the 360-member House is needed to remove the Speaker.

    As head of the select committee that picked Chairmen and Deputies, it is safe to assume that Dogara’s loyalist may include 96 chairmen of standing committees and the 96 deputies. Besides, others loyal to Dogara would move in his direction if push comes to shove. The answer is no; the anti-Dogara forces cannot crank up the figures in their man’s favour.

     The moral question

    Some have argued that in a normal society where honour counts in public office, those accused by Jibrin would have resigned their position and subjected themselves to any investigation required to clear their names. But others are of the opinion that there is no need for those accused by Jibrin to step down as he is on a vendetta because he was sacked. Dogara and others merely carried out their duty, they claimed.

    The budget padding saga can only end in one of two ways. The first is that members will rally round each other to protect the institution of the House of Representatives. Many of them are already pained at the manner in which the House has been portrayed.

    Although Jibrin and a few others who want to remain anonymous are supporting the call for an urgent re-convening of the House in order to deal with his allegations, some of those calling for the shortening of the recess appear to do so for different motives.

    While Jibrin is calling for it so that those accused would step down and external investigations commence, the members on Dogara’s side would love to see Jibrin further sanctioned. The plan would be simple. A member would stand under privilege and say that the institution has been desecrated by Jibrin’s allegations and call for his suspension.

    Recall that Dogara now has sweeping powers under the new House rule for which a member, Ali Madaki, took him to court. If allowed, Dogara can suspend Jibrin for the remainder of the Eighth session.

    The alternative finish is to see Dogara and others step down and call for an investigation. From National Assembly experience, that is unlikely to happen.

     

  • House rules:  Rumbles in the Green Chamber

    House rules: Rumbles in the Green Chamber

    Some members of the House of Representatives are up in arms against the new House Rules in the Green Chamber. In this report, Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu and Victor Oluwasegun in Abuja, report on the hidden issues behind the rumbles

    Power intrigues in the House of Representatives, which has been on since the emergence of the Hon. Yakubu Dogara-led leadership, was reawakened early recently when 11 members of the House dragged the Speaker, Hon Yakubu Dogara, the House and its clerk, Mohammed Sani Omolori, before an Abuja High Court over the new House Rules.

    It would be recalled that on Tuesday, October 8, 2015, the House adopted the report of an ad-hoc committee assigned to review the House Standing Orders, 2011 edition.

    The new rules, amongst others, invested the Speaker with the powers to suspend any member that approaches the Mace, the symbol of authority in the House, with whatever intent.

    It also provides the Speaker the power to suspend a member for 30 plenary days for failing to obey the presiding officer’s directive to a lawmaker to assume his seat during plenary.

    In the originating summons filed before the court by the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Ahmed Bello Mahmud, dated December 14, 2015, the 11 lawmakers, led by Hon. Aliyu Sani Madaki (APC, Kano), sought 12 reliefs from the court.

    They are praying the High Court in Abuja to declare “null and void and of no effect whatsoever” the amendment of Order X, Rule 71 (10), Order 71 ( 14 &15) and the retention of OrderX, Rule 72 ( a- d) by the House of Representatives in its proceedings of 8th October, 2015 without calling for a division as required by Order X1, Rule 77(1) of the extant Standing Orders of the House and demanded by the eleven members.

    According to them, “the provisions of Order X, Rule 71(12) depriving a suspended member of his salary or allowance during the period of suspension is unlawful, illegal, unconstitutional” and should be declared null and void by the court.

    Amongst other declarations they were seeking in the court include: “a declaration that the Estes powers in the 1st Defendant (Speaker) to present a proposal to the 2nd defendant (House of Representatives) for the suspension of any member of the House, including any or all of the plaintiffs, without debate, argument and amendment, as provided by Order X, Rule 75(1) of the advancing Orders of the 2nd Defendant is repressive, susceptible to abuse and breaches the constitutional rights of the plaintiffs to the freedoms of speech, assembly and fair hearing, and their legislative privileges as guaranteed by law.

    ” A declaration that the purported powers vested in the defendants jointly or severally in the proceedings if the 2nd defendant, including any or all of the plaintiffs, from the service of the House for periods not exceeding 30 plenary days or for the remainder of the session, or not less than six months, or for such longer period as the Speaker or Chairman  may consider expedient, or to adjourn the a house for a session in circumstances which the 1st defendant considers to be of grave disorder, is repressive arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violates Sections 60, 62 and 68 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria ( as amended).

    ” that the purported power vested in the defendants jointly or severally to suspend any member of the 2nd defendants including any or all of the Plaintiffs from the service of the House for various periods under Order X, Rules71(6), Order X, Rule 71(10), Order X, Rule 71(14&15) and Order X, Rule 72 ( a- d) or any other Order or rule of the Syamding Order of the 2nd defendant is illegal and unconstitutional for violating the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs to the freedom of expression guaranteed under under section 36 of the 1999 constitution as amended.”

    The eleven members are also seeking an interim injunction “restraining the defendants jointly and severally in themselves or through their officers, servants, agents, privies whatsoever and however from exercising or carrying out any, part of or all of the purported amendments and or retention of powers vested by the proceedings of the 2nd defendant and of the 8th day of October, 2015 pending the determination of the interlocutory injunction herein.”

    Although the protesting lawmakers did not say so directly, some of their supporters have alleged that the new rule was an authoritarian response to the acrimony that followed the June 9th Speakership election in which Dogara won. The rules, they alleged, is a desperate attempt to safeguard Dogara from perceived foes, particularly those in the camp of Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila who contested the position against him.

    For a while after the election, there were stringent cries of disagreement which grew to a crescendo after the release of the list of chairmen of standing committees which were perceived a lopsided with members of the People’s Democratic Party in the House getting good committees as opposed to the APC.

    The rules were seen as a vengeful sword waiting to descend on members opposed to the new Speaker, Yakubu Dogara, hence the move against it.

    Apart from Madaki, other lawmakers in the suit are: Aminu Ibrahim Malle (APC, Taraba); Sunday Adepoju (APC, Oyo); Ahmed Babba Kaita (APC, Katsina); Philip Shuaibu (APC, Edo); Abubakar Chika Adamu (APC, Niger), Mohammed Musa Soba (APC, Kaduna); Yusuf Bala Ikara (APC, Kaduna); Abubakar Lado Suleja (APC, Niger) and Lawal Yahaya Gumau (APC, Bauchi); Rotimi Agunsoye (APC, Lagos);

    Their lawyer Ahmed Bello Mahmud in the summons dated December 14, 2015, urged the court to declare the new Standing Orders null and void as it contravenes the provisions of the constitution.

    Since the matter was formally brought to court, there have been differing views both on the real intent of the legal action and viability of the move. While some argues that the lawmakers erred by taking what should be an internal matter within the hallowed chambers to court, others said the court remained the final arbiter open to every Nigerian that feels oppressed.

    Dr Sony Ajala, a legal practitioner in Abuja, told The Nation that this should not be a matter for the court. According to him, House Rule is expected to regulate the behavior and actions of the members within the chamber. From the legal perspective, he said, if the resolution that led to the new rule was passed in accordance with the relevant laws, it would amount to a waste of time to challenge it in court. “The court can only adjudicate when the action, the procedure adopted to pass the new rules is in breach of its own rules.”

    For Hon. Idris Kosoko, an APC chieftain and former Chairman, Science and Technology Committee in the House of Representatives who represented Badagry Federal Constituency, in his reaction, also frowned at the move to drag the matter to court. He told The Nation that “House Rules are meant to govern, checkmate, direct and control the behavour of lawmakers. This being the case, I do not see why anybody should go and challenge the adoption of the New Rules in court. We have three arms of government and the three are independent. Going to court over an internal matter will not help matters because the concept of House Rule is to achieve internal control. We cannot continue to allow our lawmakers behave anyhow they like. I suggest that some of the honourable members would need to take another look at the dictionary definition of the word honourable and compare it with their behavours even at the hallowed chamber.”

    However, in defence of the action, Hon. Aliyu Madaki (APC Kano), who spearheaded the move told The Nation that the New Rule is unconstitutional and should be declared null and void. “There is no organisation, society or government body that will work without rules and regulations guiding it. In the House, we have our rules book. What we are contesting in court is that the rules were changed and it is our belief that the way and manner the rules were changed, the procedures of changing the rules were not followed. Not only that, it is also our contention that some undemocratic things have been put into the new rules,” he said.

    The controversy continues even as some observers insist the rumble is remotely connected to the power struggle that dates back to the sudden emergence of Dogara as the Speaker of the House. Others feared that the development may be a prelude to a fresh crisis in the House. But according to Dr. Ajala, “I do not see what is happening as crisis, I see it instead as part of the usual struggle for power and control.”

     

  • Who’ll preside over the Green Chamber?

    Who’ll preside over the Green Chamber?

    As the search for the next Speaker of the House of Representatives dominates political discuss across the country, Assistant Editor, Dare Odufowokan, reports on the frontline candidates, the zones and their arguments

    Following its surprise overwhelming victory at the March 28 Presidential and National Assembly elections, the All Progressives Congress (APC), upon the inauguration of the new National Assembly on the 4th of June, 2015, is expected to take charge of the leadership of both chambers of the federal legislature, replacing the defeated Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), as the new majority party in government. Going in line with that swift change, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, majority leader and other principal officers of the House would be produced by the party.

    Pundits are already predicting that the House leadership positions would be filled by members of the APC from the stronghold of the new governing party, which include the North-East, North-West, North-Central and South-West. The exclusion of the South-East and the South-South is not unconnected with the dismal performance of APC in these zones on March 28 and April 11 that saw the PDP claiming nearly all the National Assembly seats in these areas.

    Consequently, few days after the results of the elections were announced and with the National Working Committee (NWC) of the APC yet to make an official pronouncement on which zone of the country will produce the heads of the two chambers, six federal lawmakers from six states in four zones of the country, indicated interest in clinching the House number one position. They include Israel Ajibola Famurewa from Osun State (South-West); Yakubu Dogara from Bauchi (North-East), Femi Gbajabiamila from Lagos (South-West), Mohammed Monguno from Borno (North-East), Pally Iriase from Edo State (South-South); Abdulmumin Jibrin from Kano (North-West).

    Expectedly, the race for the Speakership is generating a lot of issues as the candidates use all factors ranging from zoning to experience and the need to balance certain variable in the new government as reasons why they should be considered for the plum job. The gladiators are joined in the ensuing political contest by their various geo-political zones with unending clamours for a chance to produce the next helmsman of the lower chamber of the National Assembly.

    Northwest, Jibrin and the Buhari challenge

    And from the North-West, Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin is warning the leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC) against preventing lawmakers from the North-West from contesting for the position in spite of raging argument that with the President-elect from the zone, it is unfair for it to be eyeing the number three seat.

    Jibrin, who chairs the House Committee on Finance, said it amounts to blackmail for anybody to suggest that no lawmaker from the North-West should be considered as either the Senate President or as Speaker of the House of Representatives because the President-elect is from the zone. According to him, the election of General Muhammadu Buhari from the North-West is not enough to affect the zoning arrangement because he was elected before the party started discussion on the issue of National Assembly leadership.

    He said: “In the first instance, we are getting the interpretation of the zoning arrangement completely wrong. The Presidency is not supposed to be zoned because whoever emerges is the President of the whole Nigeria. Muhammadu Buhari was never presented as the candidate of the North-West. The whole idea is for the President to emerge first. After the emergence of the President, the six geo-political zones would have to sit down and distribute whatever positions that are left particularly, that of the parliament.

    “I think we need to get this properly right. There would be seven segments. Six are those of the zone while one is that of the President. This is really going to help the country when people actually realise that the President is not supposed to be included in the zoning arrangement.” According to the lawmaker, if the office of the President was included in the zoning arrangement, Governor Rochas Okorocha would not have contested against Muhammadu Buhari at the APC presidential primaries.

    He said: “Although the President-elect is from the North-West but trying to exclude his zone from benefiting from the leadership positions in the incoming 8th National Assembly is very unfair, adding that his zone had the largest contingent of the state assembly members, Senators, members of the House of Representatives and even recorded the highest number of votes during the Presidential election.

    “What do we tell our people if you exclude us from the leadership positions in the National Assembly, simply because of zoning? We want the President to concentrate on the entire country. We want other offices that we will take back to our people, because they need to hold on to something”, Jubrin said, calling on all eligible senators and members of the House of Representatives from the North-West to come out and contest the leadership of the National Assembly because it is their right to do so.

    But Jibrin’s kinsman and fellow legislator from Kano State, Hon. Nasir Garo, disagrees with him as he cautioned some of his colleagues seeking the number Four (4) seat who are calling for the jettisoning of zoning to eschew such idea and work for the success of APC. “For me, Nigeria is not yet politically matured to jettison zoning. It is important that we carry every zone along, especially in the distribution of political offices in the land,” he said.

    He added: “To me, the issue of zoning is very important and we should maintain it. I strongly believe and rightly so that there is no zone in the contrary that does not have individuals that have the capacity and capabilities to effectively run the, leadership of the National Assembly. “In view of this, whatever misgiving anyone can have against zoning will definitely not hold water, we have evolved over time and even though we are still open to learning.

    “The only problem I have is the delay in coming out with the zoning arrangement by the party, the earlier the party comes out with its decision the better for everyone. I say this because the delay is likely to cost contestants time and resources.

    “Apart from that, as some of them have set out to work, there may have been some promises along the way. The point is that what happens to some of these promises if the party eventually zoned out their candidate? So, my take is that the party should expedite action on it and come out with its decision for people to streamline and articulate their strategies rather than going from pillar to post.

    While he is unwilling to let go his ambition, even as sources within the APC in the North-West say he is not being supported by his party men in the zone; it is left to be seen how Jibrin intends to overcome the Buhari challenge he faces in his quest to be Speaker.

    Gbajabiamila, Famurewa jostle from the South-West

    Buoyed by permutations that the party will eventually zone the seat to his native South-West zone, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, Hon. Gbajabiamila, recently increased the tempo of his campaign for the position by setting up mobilization committees, saddled with the responsibility of reaching out to state caucuses to woo more lawmakers to his side. Reliable party sources added that beyond the issue of zoning, the party leadership may back Gbajabiamila for the job given his pedigree and experience.

    “Above all things, the party is concerned about the need to ensure a stable legislature as we go into government at the centre for the first time in 16 years. While zoning will in no way be jettisoned, experience and pedigree will be seriously considered in arriving at the choice of who leads the next National Assembly. We will in no way do away with lawmakers who played pivotal roles in positioning the party as a force in the outgoing assembly.

    Gbajabiamila, a four-time returnee lawmaker, was the Deputy House Minority leader till the end of the 2007-2011 term. He emerged as Minority Leader in 2011. He is credited by his colleagues for his “oratory and erudite approach” to debates in the House, which gave the opposition loud presence in the outgoing session. Before the race for the Speaker’s seat blew open with the Lagos lawmaker in the frontline, many had thought he would simply step into the position of the Majority Leader with the APC having full majority control of the House after the March 28 polls.

    But party sources revealed that the South-West caucus in the House threw up his candidacy following indications that the Senate presidency may return to the north upon the failure of the South-East to return any of the party’s senators to the National Assembly thereby leaving the North-Central and the North-East in the race in spite of the fact that the President-elect, General Muhammaddu Buhari, is from the North-West geo-political zone in the north as well.

    But beyond the zoning issue, many commentators have been citing competence and experience as the major selling points of Hon. Gbajabiamila in his quest to lead the House. “Gbajabiamila is the best material from the South-West in terms of legislative experience and House leadership at the moment. He is tested and trusted by most of his colleagues in the House and his records are there to speak for him. Beyond all other factors, it is important to give credence to competence in matters like this,” a member of the House from Kwara State, said.

    “The North has President and they will also take the Senate President. The South-West has the Vice-President, but since the South-South and South-East have shut themselves out in a way, it becomes necessary for the South-West to take up the speakership, especially when the man in question is eminently qualified to occupy the exalted seat. In a situation like this, we must consider all factors and ensure that at the end of the day, the best man is given the job,” a party leader said.

    Perhaps conscious of his underdog status in the race, Famurewa, has hinted that the leadership of the party has the final say on which zone of the country and the personality that will get the slot. The Ijesa-South Federal Constituency of Osun State representative said the speakership race is not a do or die affair, adding that his ambition was still subjected to final decision of the leaders of All Progressives Congress (APC).

    The lawmaker, who explained that though his colleagues from other geo-political zones, especially the northern axis of the country, have unofficially endorsed and mobilized other members of the green chamber for his candidature ahead of the June 2015 speakership election, declared that “I have to appeal to them to exercise caution in the way and manner they go about this internal campaign so as not to run foul of the APC leaders.

    Reports say the Gbajabiamila camp, notwithstanding his seeming good chance at emerging victorious, is not resting on its oars as consultations continue amongst both returning and new legislators. According to reports, The Gbajabiamila arrowheads in some state are Mr. Rufai Chanchangi for Kaduna State, Mr. Abdulahi Balarabe for Sokoto State, Khadijah Ibrahim for Yobe and Bolarinwa White for Ondo State, amongst others.

    Dogara, Monguno and the North-East quest

    While many analysts are still critically examining the move by Dogara and Monguno, both from the North-East to produce the Speaker of the House of Representatives of the 8th National Assembly, considering indications that the zone may produce the next President of the Senate, a pressure group, North-East Concerned Citizens, recently threw its weight behind the contenders, insisting that the North-East geopolitical zone deserves the position the most among other zones in the country. The group, like many other bodies and individuals from the zone, would want Nigerians to see the two lawmakers’ ambitions beyond their persons but rather as a geo-political quest for political survival.

    Endorsing the ambitions of Dogara and Monguno from Bauchi and Borno States respectively, the group appealed to lawmakers and the leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC), to afford the zone the opportunity of occupying the coveted seat for the first time in the political journey of the country. Speaking with journalists in Abuja, the deputy coordinator of the group, Hon. Salisu Sabo, stated that members of the House know that the North East has people who are credible and enjoy wide acceptability, respect and recognition among old and new lawmakers of the Green Chamber, making them suitable for the job.

    “I will like to use this medium to appeal to the members of the House of Representatives and members-elect and also the leadership of our great party, APC, to zone the seat of the speakership to the North-East geopolitical zone of the country. The North-East, which has greatly contributed to the activities of the House of Representatives, hereby forwards our intention to produce the Speaker in the 8th Assembly. The time has come and the time is right. We have shown strength and character.

    “It is only fair for the people of the North-East to settle for nothing less than the leadership of the House of Representatives,” Sabo stressed. But of the two, Dogara appears to be the leading candidate from the zone with reports indicating that the North-West and North-Central caucuses in the House may have endorsed him for the position.

    Hon. Dogara represents Tafawa-Balewa/Bogoro/Das Federal Constituency of Bauchi State in the House of Representatives. He chairs the House Services Committee and was the chairman of Customs Committee in the sixth Assembly. He was among the 37 PDP members of the House of Representatives who defected to the APC, in spite of the fact that his home state is not among those whose governors joined APC.  According to him, the distribution of positions in the next National Assembly must guarantee “fairness and justice.”

    Dogara described the North-East as the poorest geo-political zone in the country that required the backing of other zones in the sharing of political offices. He also stated that the reported prospect of the zone producing the Senate President did not in any way affect his aspiration. He addressed a news conference where he said, “We represent the aspirations of a zone that is the poorest in the country.

    “There are candidates from other zones that already hold leadership positions in the APC, yet they are running for the position of Speaker. Why are questions not being asked in their own case?” Dogara admitted that the APC must be passing through a difficult period in taking a position on the issue, but he advised the party to be guided aright so as not to hurt the feelings of members.

    But in spite of Dogara’s current promising chance in the race, most pundits are of the opinion that he may have to settle for something lesser than the Speakership should his zone produce the President of the Senate. According to a reliable party source, it is most unlikely that the APC will allow one zone produce the two frontline positions.

    “We are not worried over the ongoing agitations. It is good for the party and for democracy, contrary to what some people are trying to insinuate. We are comfortable with the aspirations of all our members jostling for positions. However, one thing that is sure is that the positions would be spread amongst the geo-political zones. When it is time for us to ensure that, as a disciplined party, we will have little or no problem in getting that done,” our source said.

    On his part, Monguno, who is also the Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture, said he is not desperate to become the next Speaker of the House of Representatives, adding that he is willing to abide by the decision of his party, All Progressives Congress (APC), on the zoning of offices to parts of the country. He however advised that whoever emerges as the Speaker should give premium to addressing key challenges of economic downturn and security, specifying that if he happens to be the favoured one, he would assist the Executive on how to surmount the hydra – headed challenges.

    Iriase’s case for the South-South

    In spite of the less than encouraging disposition of party leaders to the idea of the South-South being considered for the position, the lawmaker representing Owan Federal Constituency of Edo State in the House of Reprehensive, Pally Iriase, insists that the APC should support the South-South to produce Speaker for the Assembly in-line with the principles of fairness, equity and Justice. The two -term member is supporting his right to speakership with Section 14(13) of the 1999 Constitution that states that Federal Character must reflect in the composition of Government of the Federation.

    He noted the President-elect is from North-West and his Vice from South-West stressing that based on federal character provision, neither of these zones should get priority on the queue for National Assembly presiding officers Pally Iriase  emphasized that as things presently stand, the right thing to do is to have a South-South Speaker, thereby ensuring that there is no predominance of persons from a few states, ethnic or sectional group in the incoming government.

    Pally Iriase, the Deputy Chairman of House Committee on Constituency Outreach Committee further said as a good manager of people with a long track of experience, he is the best candidate from the South-South to fit the position. He cautioned the APC not to “go against the Federal Character Principle” enshrined in the 1999 Constitution, insisting that the seat should be zoned to the South-South “for the purpose of geo-political balancing.”

    According to Iriase, the APC will be going against the Federal Character principle if its zoning ruled out the South-South. “I don’t wish my party a replay of the Peoples Democratic Party scenario in 2011. If the zoning is equitable and fair, members may not want to rock the boat of the APC.” Supporting Iriase’s position, the South-South Equity Forum (SEF) recently said the incoming government of the All Progressives Congress (APC) would not be fair to the South-South region if it does not allow it produce the next Speaker of the House of Representatives.

    SEF said it is only “fair, just and, as a matter of necessity” that if the Senate presidency goes to either the North-East or North-Central as being speculated, the speakership should go to the South-South with consideration for the member representing Owan Federal Constituency in the House of Representative, Pally Iriase as Speaker.

    SEF, led by Harrison Omagbon, at a press briefing in Benin City, appealed to the leadership of the APC and the President-elect to be on the side of “fair play, equity and justice in the larger interest of the APC and the country,” noting that Edo State, an APC controlled state in the South-South states, is among states, “where General Muhammad Buhari, the President-elect scored 45 percent, which is above the mandatory 25 percent as required by the constitution.”

    Although Iriase describes himself as the only one that has the necessary administrative experience among the aspirants, promising to run a transparent leadership, fight corruption and ensure prudent management of resources, many analysts are of the opinion that aside the issue of zoning, the lawmaker will find it difficult to compete for the position with some of the more experienced aspirants.