Tag: IBB

  • 2027: Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim meets OBJ, IBB, pledges to secure Nigeria

    2027: Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim meets OBJ, IBB, pledges to secure Nigeria

    Former presidential candidate and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential hopeful, Dr. Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, has intensified consultations ahead of the 2027 general election, holding separate high-level meetings with former President Olusegun Obasanjo and former Military President, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (rtd.).

    The closed-door meetings, held on Monday, are part of Dr. Hashim’s ongoing nationwide engagements with elder statesmen and key national figures to discuss the future direction of Nigeria.

    Sources familiar with the consultations said Dr. Hashim assured both former leaders of his capacity to tackle Nigeria’s security challenges, rebuild national unity, stabilise the polity, and restore economic prosperity. He reportedly stressed that Nigeria urgently needs purposeful, inclusive, and unifying leadership to avert deeper national fractures.

    Both Obasanjo and Babangida, though non-partisan, are widely regarded as influential elder statesmen who remain deeply invested in Nigeria’s unity and stability, having played defining roles in the country’s political and military history.

    Dr. Hashim arrived at President Obasanjo’s residence in Abeokuta at about 11:00 a.m. and departed roughly an hour later. He subsequently travelled to Minna, where he met with General Babangida aboard a Hawker 800 jet with registration number 5N-BZP.

    Read Also: Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim Foundation grants N20 million to Small Scale Entrepreneurs in Kwara

    During the Minna meeting, Dr. Hashim reportedly appealed to Babangida’s historic role in preserving Nigeria’s unity, referencing the sacrifices made during the civil war.

    “General, you still carry in your body the wounds of the war fought to keep Nigeria one. Many of your colleagues were not fortunate to survive that struggle. If Nigeria is allowed to disintegrate today through incompetent leadership, then the sacrifices of patriots like you would have been wasted,” Hashim was quoted as saying.

    He emphasised that the 2027 election must be centred on national rescue, warning that continued leadership failure could further endanger the country’s cohesion and stability.

    Dr. Hashim was accompanied on the visits by the Chairman of the North Central Renaissance Movement, Professor Nghargbu K’tsɔ, as well as other aides.

    Political observers view the consultations as a strategic move by Dr. Hashim to position himself as a national consensus-building figure ahead of what is expected to be a highly consequential 2027 presidential election.

  • IBB, Akinrinade to leaders: emulate Hassan Katsina’s leadership

    IBB, Akinrinade to leaders: emulate Hassan Katsina’s leadership

    • Insecurity in North threatening national stability – Siddique

    Former Military President, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB), on Saturday, urged Nigerian leaders, particularly those from the north, to emulate the leadership virtues of the late General Hassan Usman Katsina, whom he described as “a great icon of Northern Nigeria’s development.”

    General Katsina, who died in 1995 at 62, was Military Governor of Northern Nigeria, Chief of Army Staff and Deputy Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters.

    Speaking in Kaduna at the 2nd General Hassan Katsina Memorial Conference organised by the New Vision Development Initiative (NEVDI), IBB who was represented by Col. Lawan Gwadabe (rtd) said Katsina’s humility, patriotism and lifelong pursuit of peace remain instructive for today’s leaders.

    He praised NEVDI for sustaining a forum that keeps alive the ideals of past leaders at a time the nation faces “numerous development challenges.”

    According to the former president, General Katsina’s philosophy should “rekindle our nostalgia for the development of Arewa” and galvanise today’s leaders to confront the socio-economic obstacles stunting the region.

    Read Also:My flying experience with IBB, Abacha, Obasanjo, Shonekan, others —Ex-Presidential Air Fleet pilot

    He recalled Katsina’s passionate commitment to the underprivileged, especially his strong stance against the Almajiri system and advocacy for modern, balanced education for Northern children.

    “To the underprivileged he devoted all his time… to be their voices,” Babangida said, describing the late army chief as a unifier who believed Nigeria could only prosper through peace and cohesion.

    “Together we can be strong and progressive; divided we will fail,” he quoted Katsina, noting that despite his princely heritage, “he remained humble, serene and service-driven.”

    IBB prayed for the continued repose of Katsina’s soul, urging participants to draw inspiration from the values he lived by. “May Almighty Allah bestow upon us the wisdom to tread the great paths that immortalised him,” he added.

    Also paying tribute, former Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), Lt.-Gen. Alani Akinrinade described Katsina as “a distinguished military leader and patriot” whose selfless service continues to inspire generations. Akinrinade, represented by former NDA Commandant, Maj.-Gen. Paul Tarfa (rtd), called him “a prince among soldiers and a soldier among princes.”

    He highlighted Katsina’s leadership during the civil war, including the expansion of the armed forces, the timely payment of entitlements and post-war rehabilitation of soldiers.

    “A Sandhurst-trained officer, his integrity and commitment to Nigeria’s unity remain exemplary. The Nigerian Army has produced many illustrious generals, but few match his mettle,” he said.

    Guest Speaker, Prof. Abubakar Siddique Mohammed, warned that rising insecurity in the north now threatens national stability. Siddique, who heads the Centre for Democratic Development Research and Training (CDDRT), said the region hosts 65 per cent of Nigeria’s multidimensionally poor population.

    He said the statistics are bleak: 10 million out-of-school children nationwide, 60 per cent of them in the North; youth unemployment exceeding 50 per cent in some states; and 350,000 hectares lost annually to desertification.

    On security, he noted that Boko Haram has claimed over 35,000 lives and displaced 2.5 million people since 2009, while banditry and kidnappings have devastated hundreds of communities.

    Siddique said these crises are intertwined, creating a “poverty–insecurity trap” that threatens the nation’s stability. He called for urgent reforms in governance, security, education and economic diversification to halt the region’s slide.

  • IBB builds hospital for grandfather’s community in Kano

    IBB builds hospital for grandfather’s community in Kano

    • …facility to be dedicated to late wife Maryam, IBB’s parents

    Former Military President, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, has remembered his ancestral root in Kumurya village, Bunkure local government area of Kano State, where his grandfather was born.

    Babangida’s grandfather, Malam Ibrahim, was born and raised in Kumurya village under Rano emirate before he relocated to Wushishi, Niger State, as a trader.

    Upon leaving office as Military Head of State in 1993, Babangida realised he did not bequeath an impressionistic tangible legacy for the Kumurya community. 

    He however, vowed he must build a project for them before he departs the planet earth.

    Read Also: George celebrates IBB at 84

    The last time the issue tugged his heart, Babangida invited Sheikh Ibrahim Khalil -the Chairman, Kano State Council of Ulama, to Minna in August, where he enquired from the Sheikh the kind of project that would serve the people of his origin.

    Khalil told IBB that his grandpa’s people now have schools and mosques, so an hospital would be ideal, to stop or reduce to barest minimum maternal and child mortalities and other preventable deaths in the area. Babangida approved.

    The village was agog on Sunday as the hospital foundation was laid. Gidan Jefau -the family house of IBB’s late grandfather, also came alive.

    At the land where the hospital foundation was laid, General Babangida, represented by General Halliru Akilu, explained that the gesture was fulfilled after 27 years.

    IBB said he was proud of his roots in Kumurya, Kano, which had been legendary even before colonialism.

    Gen. Akilu said: “The former Head of State invited Sheikh Ibrahim Khalil to Minna in August this year and after a discussion, the Sheikh told him that Kumurya lacks a health facility.

    “Babangida, being very generous, therefore supported the idea of building a hospital which he dedicates to his parents and his late wife, Maryam.”

    Akilu said he would not give further details of why it took this long before Babangida remembered his roots, noting that the village head was aware of previous attempts to build an Islamiyya school and a mosque for the community.

    Akilu further said, even as Head of State, IBB lived and worked with illustrious sons of Rano emirate who are known for their patriotism and dedication to duty.

    He listed Generals Murtala Muhammed, Sani Abacha and Babangida as former Heads of State from Kano, adding that General Abdulsalami Abubakar is also traced to Kano, even though many may not know.

    The Emir of Rano, Muhammad Isa Umar, said the day was special for the emirate where parents of the former head of state hailed from.

    He revealed how Kumurya town is so important to the emirate, disclosing that during the war against Ningi emirate, the late emir of Rano, Alhaji Umaru, was camped there to protect the emirate against invaders.

    “The former head of states (IBB) is very proud of Kumurya and when I was district head of Bunkure, I personally knew of his plans to bring development to the village. This hospital, when completed, will certainly cater for women and children and the general people of Kumurya,” the emir said.

    Village head of Kumurya said, in addition to the hospital, Babangida is rebuilding the mud house known as Gidan Jefau belonging to his uncles, expressing gratitude for the gesture.

    Gen. Babangida (Rtd), has revealed that “Ibrahim” in his combination of names is his grandfather’s. And that while joining the military, he was being mistaken for a Yoruba, so he added Babangida in the end to prove his northern ancestry.

    He narrated that his great grandfather had migrated from Sokoto to Kumurya in Kano where he gave birth to his grandfather, Ibrahim, who moved to Kontagora before settling in Wushishi, Niger State, where his father, Badamasi, was born.

    Badamasi then moved from Wushishi to Minna in 1941 where he gave birth to IBB in August that year.

  • Niger shuts IBB varsity over insecurity

    Niger shuts IBB varsity over insecurity

    Niger State Government has shut down the Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (IBB) University, Lapai over recent attacks of students by armed robbers.

    A statement by the Secretary to the Niger State Government, Abubakar Usman on Wednesday night explained the decision comes in light of recent security breaches and the unfortunate loss of lives within the university community.

    Expressing sadness and concern over the recent incidents, the government urged the university community to remain vigilant, calm, and cooperate with the authorities during the period of closure.

    Read Also: NDLEA seizes four tonnes of drugs, arrests 583 suspects in Adamawa

    “The safety and security of all citizens, including the students, remain a top priority for the government. The state government is working diligently to restore order, ensure the safety of all citizens, and maintain peace within the state.

    “The government promised to investigate into the security breeches and ensure that the perpetrators are brought to justice while reiterating its commitment to upholding law and order, as well as protecting the lives and property of all residents in Niger State,” he said.

  • My takeaways from IBB’s autobiography

    My takeaways from IBB’s autobiography

    Book Title: A Journey in Service

    Author: Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida
    Book Reviewer: Bukar Usman
    Publisher: BookCraft, Ibadan
    Year of Publication: 2025

    Number of Pages: 420

    Gen Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB), now 83, had hinted in an interview he granted to TELL magazine in 1995, about two years after his exit from office, that he was already working on his memoir. Since then, one could say, the nation had been anxiously waiting for the publication of the memoir. The anticipation was due to IBB’s extraordinary antecedents, particularly the controversies surrounding his assumption of and exit from power, his controversial transition to civil rule programme, his laissez-faire economic policies, as well as other roles he was perceived to have played in the military and in the political re-engineering of the country.

     The long-awaited former military president’s memoir, a product of about 3 decades of reflections, was finally presented at the Congress Hall Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja on February 20, 2025. Though the staggering amount of about 20 billion Naira realized at the occasion made instant news, the weightier outcome of the occasion consists of the revelations in the book about past key events, including the annulment of the June 12, 1993 Presidential Election. There were also forceful and unfeigned remarks by high-profile personalities many of whom had helmed crucial public and private establishments during the Babangida era.

     The 420-page memoir has 13 chapters spread across its five parts; there are also a copious appendices section and an epilogue. Apart from the chapter on June 12 (which happens to be Chapter 12 – what an intriguing coincidence!), I will conduct my review of this book roughly in the order in which the chapters and closing sections are presented.

     Parts One and Two contain the chapters on Babangida’s early years: his birth, parentage, upbringing, education, and enlistment into the Nigerian Army. His promising leadership qualities manifested when he was appointed a Head Boy in Provincial Secondary School, Bida, Niger State. He joined the army in 1962; the portions of the book about his strictly military roles leave no one in doubt that IBB’s 8-year public service as military President of Nigeria and Commander-in-Chief of the Nigerian Armed Forces was preceded by a distinguished professional military career that saw him rising from his enlistment as Cadet in 1962 to the post of Chief of Army Staff in 1984. In the process, he faced several notable challenges that brought out his bravery and gallantry, among other leadership qualities that endeared him to not only the rank-and-file and officer corps of his immediate constituency, the elite Armoured Corps of the Nigerian Army, but also the generality of members of the Nigerian Armed Forces. Indeed, the reputation and popularity of the gap-toothed General extended beyond the military to the Nigerian population. Many who had close contact with him, including this reviewer, would attest to his personableness and sharp memory.

    One testimony to his gallantry and bravery was his participation in the prosecution of the Nigerian civil war as a Major and Commander of 82 Battalion in 1969. He was wounded in the war which left a physical scar on him to this day. Another was leading troops to the Radio House in Lagos to flush out Major Buka Suka Dimka and his soldiers who were in the process of overthrowing the government of General Murtala Mohammed in 1976.

    In Part Three, Babangida discussed, among other topics, the overall impact of military interventions in Nigeria and drew the conclusion that military administrations, in spite of real or perceived shortcomings, made major ‘unquantifiable contributions’ to the growth and development of Nigeria. Notable examples of these contributions, according to him, included structural balancing of the polity via states creation exercises; establishment of the National Youth Service Corps; introduction of Universal Free Primary Education Scheme; attempts at creating institutions that outlive everyone, e.g. People’s/Community Banks; monumental infrastructural developments that opened up the country; exemplary UN peacekeeping roles played by Nigeria.

    He also cited economic restructuring of the country as a major contribution of military administrations, although virtually all the examples he cited took place during his own administration. Inspired by three Chinese axiomatic expressions (“The journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step”, “Let a million flowers bloom”, and “It does not matter if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice”), President Babangida freed up the economy from government control and introduced open-market principles that enhanced import substitution and led to greater liberalization of the media, banking, airline, textile and agro-allied industries sectors. There was, however, neglect of ‘agriculture’ and over reliance on oil, for which he expressed regret. Unfortunately, some of these policies and programmes, like the Structural Advancement Programme (SAP), evoked serious protests alleged to have been instigated by adversaries, mostly politicians and ideologues in the academic community. This is discussed in Chapter 8.

    IBB is of the opinion that in spite of efforts made at restructuring and constitutional reviews, Nigeria’s continued existence as a united country is hinged on the attitude of the citizens and on the country’s capacity to build and sustain durable institutions, like those in successful developed countries. As he puts it, “…most of our problems are attitudinal. In other words, you can have the best laws in the world, the best constitution in the universe, and even the most committed leaders; however, if the attitude of the key political players remains unchanged from retrogressive set ways, nothing will change…institutions matter because they endure, they outlive us” (pages 114-115).   

    Foreign policy is discussed in Chapter 9 where IBB revealed that Nigeria’s foreign policy initiatives during his dispensation were rooted in ‘Afrocentric Activism’ and ‘soft power’ projection. Examples of such initiatives were Nigeria’s demand for expansion of United Nations (UN) permanent membership seats; demand for an African to head the Commonwealth that resulted in the appointment of Chief Emeka Anyaoku as Secretary-General of the organisation; military intervention in Liberia that ended the civil war and brought peace in that country; and restoration of relations with Israel. Other foreign policy programmes undertaken by the Babangida administration were formation of Concert of Medium Powers after the end of the Cold War as an alternate forum for the Non-Aligned states; establishment of Technical Aid Corps to enable Nigeria supply much-needed manpower to other developing countries; hosting of Organization of African Unity (OAU) Summit as alternate venue to Addis Ababa which was under serious threat of being overrun by dissidents, who, indeed, succeeded in doing so; and the institution of ‘Economic Diplomacy’  as centre-piece of Nigeria’s foreign policy.

    In Chapter 10, Babangida narrated in detail the major events that evoked opposition to his rule and led to acts of destabilization. He cited the following as the causes of the main incumbency challenges his administration faced: Death of Dele Giwa by parcel bomb; the Mamman Vatsa attempted coup; Gideon Orkar attempted coup; alleged Nigeria’s membership of the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC); Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) riots against rising cost of living and upward adjustment of fuel prices; and the NAF C-130 Air Crash that killed 159 officers of the various armed services.

    Lindsay Chervinsky, author of The Cabinet, has pointedly noted that “For as long as men have wielded power, women have facilitated their reigns.” IBB fleshed out the truth of this view in Chapter 11 where he discussed his dear wife, Maryam, who ably managed his Home Front. According to him, one of the criteria the Army uses in judging its officers is maintaining a stable family. This he got from his dear spouse Maryam of blessed memory, to whom he devoted the entire chapter. He wrote about her upbringing, the circumstances of their marriage, her activism as President of the Nigerian Army Officers Wife’s Association (NAOWA), her roles as First Lady and Chairperson of Better Life for Rural Women. IBB talked about her diligence, discipline, energy and sense of purpose which were evident in all her roles:

    Sometimes, I felt that 24 hours was insufficient for her in one day. She was a wife, a mother, a housewife, a passionate advocate for rural women, and most of all, a partner. She was very close to the children and knew what they were doing at every point. We decided together what was best for them and sought to shield them as best as we could from the rough and tumble of living in the public eye. We didn’t want our perceived faults and shortcomings to rub off on our children.

    I am grateful for the life Maryam and I shared and for the fruit of our union. Coping without her has not been easy, but it has been made much less demanding by the memories of our life together and the length of her shadow (p.236).

    In the last Chapter of the book (Chapter 13), IBB discussed his life after retirement stating that upon retirement to Minna his home-place on August 27, 1993, he assumed the status of a non-partisan pan-Nigerian statesman open to and sharing his experiences and vision with all category of persons and groups, the young and old. According to him, to date, no week passes without him playing host to visitors.

    At the end of it all, IBB noted with delight that by and large there is an unquestionable acceptance of Nigeria as a united, strong, and indivisible federation. In a bid to sustain and strengthen this vision of Nigeria, he dedicated the book’s epilogue (6 pages) to 30-year-old Nigerian youths (the next generation) and charged them to be better-informed, pan-Nigerian and global citizens with shared dreams and desires in an advanced technological world. He advised them to know their country, make connections, serve to the best of their abilities, combine compassion with ruthless decisiveness in leadership and above all embrace fundamental minimum ingredients of Nigeria’s nationhood that must not be toyed with. Christened as ‘no go areas’, they include federalism, constitutional republican democracy, diversity, secularity and inclusiveness. They should also bear in mind always that Nigeria remains the most significant black nation in the world and that the future belongs to them.

    ‘Acknowledgments’ that traditionally come at the beginning of a book are left to the end in IBB’s book, which is dedicated to his parents and his wife Maryam of blessed memory who uplifted and gave meaning to his life. It is also dedicated to fallen heroes. IBB says that the book is a testament to a collective effort of several persons, many of whom he mentioned and appreciated.

    There are 6 appendices that take a sizable portion of the book (81 pages). Appendix I is a full-length reproduction of IBB’s maiden address on August 27,1985 upon assumption of the reigns of government after overthrowing then Major-General Muhammadu Buhari. Appendix II carries an extensive interview with TELL Magazine on July 24, 1995 in which IBB out of office was drilled at length about June 12 and in which he dropped the hint that he was already working on his memoir. Appendix III is IBB’s address to UN General Assembly delivered in his capacity as Nigerian President and Chairman of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) on October 4,1991. Against the background of the end of the Cold War and thawing of relations in Eastern Europe and taking account of the growth in membership of UN from 51 in 1945 to 166 states, IBB called for a New World Order that would address the prevailing challenges and put Africa on the path of sound democratic culture and economic development. Among the issues he said should be given due attention by the international community were: self-reliance as cornerstone for economic reform; debt crises; proliferation of conventional weapons; democratization of the UN and enlargement of the UN Security Council as well as appointment of an African as UN Secretary-General. Subsequent to that address Boutros Boutros-Ghali of Egypt and Kofi Atta Annan of Ghana were appointed UN Secretary-General in succession. Appendix IV is a 2-page statistical result of votes scored by the two leading candidates in the controversial Presidential Election of June 12, 1993. The schedule clearly records that Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola met the required votes in 20 States and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) while Othman Tofa won in 11. Appendix V is IBB’s address to the National Assembly members-elect on July 27, 1992 on a New National Order. Appendix VI brings about an end to the book. It was IBB’s lecture to a symposium on “The Babangida Regime: Problems and Perspective of Interpretation” organised by the Open Press Ltd and The African Centre for Social and Political Research, held at the Hill Station Hotel, Jos, October 13-15, 2000.

    Read Also: IBB salutes ‘courageous, selfless’ Tinubu at 73

    This brings us to Chapter 12, the longest chapter of the book, which I chose to discuss last in this review because it is devoted to the annulment of the June 12 Presidential Election – the single most controversial act of the Babangida era. Much of the details and the controversies about June 12 evoked after the book’s presentation are already in the public domain. Suffice it to say that much of the controversy surrounds the narrative on who and who were responsible for the annulment that threatened the existence of the country. While IBB alleges that forces in the military led by Gen Sani Abacha were responsible for the annulment, his adversaries contend that since the annulment took place under his presidency, it is wrong to hang it on the neck of Abacha, more so when IBB was in a position to stand his ground, notwithstanding the reported serious threats to his life and the lives of those around him. Denying that his actions were motivated by self-survival, IBB maintains that his actions were dictated more by national interest, perception and interpretation of all the happenings then. As he put it, “…I decided it was better to keep the annulment of the 1993 Presidential Election rather than end with a full-blown conflagration that could have spelt the end of a great country” (p.288).

    Babangida’s A Journey in Service should interest everyone, someone said, because it contains the good, the bad and the ugly. I think that beyond the issue of June 12, the overriding value of IBB’s memoir is that it tells the story of a Nigerian leader who superintended over a period of unusual developments marked by unprecedented political and economic initiatives that, in varying degrees, reshaped the political and socio-economic landscape of this country. Babangida’s inventiveness included, among others, Option A4 (the grassroots-driven open-ballot electoral system that made it almost impossible to rig); creation of additional 11 states and additional 288 local governments; restructuring of the Nigerian Security Organization (NSO), leading to the creation of State Security Service (SSS), National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA); deregulation of the economic sector and privatization of public enterprises; deregulation of the broadcast industry, leading to establishment of private radio and television stations; and accelerated relocation of Nigeria’s seat of government from Lagos to Abuja.

    The annulment of the presidential election of June 12 1993 tends to over-shadow, some would say unfairly, the positive effects of the aforesaid unprecedented initiatives of the Babangida administration. Some readers of the Babangida narrative on June 12 think it is frank while others consider it one-sided, as some of those adversely affected are no longer alive to tell their stories. However, one may advise that everyone should take solace in what should be regarded as IBB’s ultimate submission on June 12: speaking during the presentation of his memoir on February 20, 2025, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, as reported by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), said, “Undoubtedly credible, free and fair elections were held on 12 June 1993. However, the tragic irony of history remains that the administration that devised a near-perfect electoral system and conducted those near-perfect elections could not complete the process. That accident of history is most regrettable. The nation is entitled to expect my expression of regret.” IBB also categorically said that M.K.O Abiola won the election.

    It was an admission many considered courageous, one that might bring some closure to the June 12 saga. Babangida was speaking to an elite audience, which included the current president, four former heads of state of Nigeria and former presidents of Ghana and Liberia. It was the kind of stage he needed to present his version of what happened during his rule. Having read Babangida’s political memoir, which I consider quite revealing, I cannot but concur with David Torrance, journalist and author, that political memoirists write out of “a determination to set the terms of (their) legacy and how (they’ll) be remembered”. Whatever anyone’s view of Babangida, A Journey in Service invites all to read the motivating factors behind some of his leadership positions and actions.  

    •       Dr. Usman, OON, Former Permanent Secretary in the Presidency Abuja
  • IBB and Evans Law of Political Perfidy

    IBB and Evans Law of Political Perfidy

    A few weeks ago when Ibrahim Babangida launched his book, “A Journey in Service”, he seized the opportunity to announce that MKO Abiola won the presidential election of June 12, 1993 which he annulled to the dismay of Nigerians. But announcing the result of an election 32 years after it was lost and won is meaningless. In any case, it is not the responsibility of a president, past or present, retired or serving, to announce the result of an election he did not conduct. It is the duty of the election manager, the person who conducted and superintended over the election.

    This particular election was conducted by Professor Humphrey Nwosu. On August 15, 2008 Professor Nwosu had at a public event at Sheraton Hotel in Abuja announced the result of that election and declared Abiola as the winner. That was and that remains the only authentic statement about that election because he was the man in charge of the election.

    I believe that it was on the basis of that declaration by Nwosu that President Muhammadu Buhari decided in June 2018 to declare June 12 as Nigeria’s Democracy Day. He went further. He conferred posthumously on Abiola the national honour of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR), an honour that is conferred on heads of states only. Abiola’s running mate, Ambassador Babagana Kingibe was decorated with the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON). So it can be said that the June 12 matter had been settled, done and dusted years ago.

    Babangida’s recent attempt to revisit it was therefore an exercise in futility, locking the barn after the animal had escaped or shifting the goal post after the goal has been scored. It was a time wasting exercise. Closure had been brought to June 12 years ago. What remains to be done now is for President Bola Tinubu to confer a national honour on Nwosu for conducting the fairest and freest election in Nigeria’s history. That will be a source of motivation for all managers of elections in Nigeria.

    IBB has apologised to Nigerian for the annulment. Apology though belated is accepted. He has also accepted responsibility for that wrong doing. That, too, is accepted. But the amazing thing is that he shifted the blame to General Sani Abacha. No matter how powerful Abacha was perceived to be, he could not have been more powerful than the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

    So, Nigerians must reject the blame game. Babangida must bear full responsibility for his rash decision which, in any case, was consistent with his maradonic moves to keep elongating military rule to the discomfiture of Nigeians.

    Abiola and Babangida were friends; some people would say close friends. Abiola was a very successful entrepreneur. That gave him an awesome source of granite strength. He worked on several projects with the military and made tons of money and he became friends with some of them, especially Babangida. During the December 31, 1983 coup organised by IBB and Co, it was rumoured that it was Abiola that financed that coup. The reason given at the time was that Abiola needed to deal with the NPN which had treated him badly by denying him the party’s ticket despite his exertions for the party. In the Concord newspaper, that speculation about Abiola’s association with the new military leaders was strong too. Three of us, Dele Giwa, Yakubu Mohammed and I had got an appointment to interview the new Head of State, General Muhammadu Buhari in February 1984.

    Read Also: Top five countries offering best salaries, visa pathways for STEM professionals in 2025

    We did an interesting 60-minute interview with Buhari which we ran in seven issues of the Concord. Abiola was happy with us for securing an interview with the new leader but he kept complaining that he had not even met the new leaders yet. We suspected that he must have had something to do with the coup otherwise what entitled him to seek to meet them or to think they had ignored him. When he kept repeating that he hadn’t met these new leaders, Yakubu Mohammed and I approached Dele Giwa and requested him to arrange for the chief to meet the new men in power. Dele Giwa was close to Brigadier Tunde Idiagbon, the powerful number two man in the system. Dele booked an appointment for the chief to meet Idiagbon. Dele also accompanied Abiola to the meeting. Abiola did not complain any longer of being ignored by the new men in power.

    Abiola had money, plenty money but he also needed power, political power. So he thought that with his friend IBB in the saddle, he had a chance to seek and possibly secure political power. So he joined the SDP, one of the two parties decreed into life by IBB. He probably did not reckon with the Evans Law of Political perfidy. That law states that, “When our friends get into power, they are not our friends anymore”.

    Perhaps IBB allowed Abiola to run for the presidency either because he didn’t think Abiola would win or because if Abiola won, he would know that he had a friend taking over from him. No one is certain why IBB allowed Abiola to run.

    Abiola was a man loved by people in various parts of the country. He spent a lot of his money to build friendship and relationships. He built mosques and churches, distributed thousands of Korans and Bibles to support the two religions. And when he picked Kingibe, a fellow Moslem as a running mate, people still supported him because he was not a religious irredentist. He deployed plenty money and technology in the election fight, covering all the 774 Local Government Areas effortlessly. Those who followed the trend of his campaign knew with pulse-pounding certainty that Abiola would win.

    As the election results tumbled in, it was clear that Abiola was heading to Aso Rock as the elected President of Nigeria. Then the unexpected happened. Babangida halted the further release of the results. The country was thrown into a paroxysm of fear. Turmoil took over. We drifted to the edge of the precipice. We knew that Babangida had brought down his bag of tricks and was searching for more tricks to pick from the bag. He had banned some politicians for no just cause. He had shifted the handover date several times over a period of eight years. Now, he had done the ultimate, scuttled an election that everyone said was conducted very fairly and very freely. That action confirmed what Lord Acton said that, “Power is Poison” Babangida used his power in a poisonous manner. He poisoned the Nigerian democratic system in a manner that brought mayhem and madness to Nigeria. Riots, demonstrations, sit-ins, sit-outs, Nigerians protested that insane action in a number of ways. That action prolonged the struggle for democracy for another six years.

    Nigeria is 25 years old as a democratic country today. Abiola’s party is in the news now. The former governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El Rufai who was an APC man has now crossed carpet to the SDP. He wants to use the SDP to overthrow Tinubu in 2027. He thinks that the reason that Abiola won the 1993 election was the SDP. No.

    Abiola won the election because of Abiola, a man of might. It wasn’t the party that gave him victory. It was Abiola that gave Abiola victory.

  • IBB in the annals of civil service reforms in Nigeria

    IBB in the annals of civil service reforms in Nigeria

    The autobiography is a most delicate, complex and indeed disruptive art form. It is the autobiographer’s authorial insistence to be heard in terms of his or her narrative addition to a historical discourse. In fact, it is the autobiographer’s narration of the historical event from his or her own perspective. And more often than not, when the autobiographer is a fundamental participant in the event, the complexities of that event and the circumstances surrounding it is multiplied. Only very few autobiographies enjoy global approval. And that is because the art form is seen as an ego trip. That sentiment is summed by the English biographer, Humphrey Carpenter: “Autobiography is probably the most respectable form of lying.” This is even made worse if the protagonists are critical individuals whose lives have affected national trajectories. General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) is one such critical protagonist, and his autobiography has arrived.

    A Journey in Service has since started generated lots of furors in all strata of the Nigerian public space, online and offline. Lots of opinions have tied IBB to several significant historical moments in Nigeria, especially the annulment of the June 12 elections, and the demise of MKO Abiola. What many have conveniently glossed over, and a case I have consistently made, is that personal narrative in the forms of autobiography and memoirs serve a unique function in terms of their historical import. If A Journey in Service had not been written, we will all be gasping within the yawning silence of the political and administrative gaps that ought to have been filled with whatever the autobiographer has to say. But now it has been written, and we can then commence the journey of unraveling how the narrative fits or fails to fit in with the existing accounts of Nigeria’s political development.

    This personal narrative has a critical import for me as a historian of Nigeria’s administrative and reform trajectories. The Babangida administration played a very fundamental role in articulating a significant portion of Nigeria’s administrative reform architecture. And so, that portion of the trajectory, and the entire institutional reform agenda of the Nigerian state, will not be complete without adding the voice and perspective of the key protagonist to the understanding of how the reform policy emerged. No matter what anyone thinks, the imperative of national history demands that such an account be added to the stock of what we already know, and to flesh out a better understanding of what we already know. The idea therefore is to see how the protagonist, no matter the groundswell of national opinion for or against him, fits into a larger picture of the political and administrative frameworks that enable us to see where the nation is coming from and where it is headed. This is a task every institutional reformer must long for without getting sidetracked by sentimental opinion that accords blame and sling mud. This is part of what makes IBB and A Journey in Service such a delight for me. Unfortunately, the head of the historic administration does not consider that irreducible reform agenda that distinguishes his administration so significantly as to celebrate its conception, elements and operation, as well as its limitations, in a significant autobiography. That responsibility has been passed to posterity. This piece rescues that fundamental omission.

    The pre-Babangida administrative reform narrative must always revert back to the 1974 Udoji Commission. That Commission is singular because it was the first to attempt an alignment between Nigeria’s reform efforts and the emerging managerial revolution in public administration across the globe. The Udoji Commission took its immediate inspiration from the Lord Fulton Committee of 1968 in Britain. The task of the Fulton Report was to inquire into the capability readiness of the British civil service to confront the modern British society and its technological complexity. Fulton’s most significant recommendation was the displacement of the cult of generalist amateur civil servants in an approaching administrative dispensation that requires a critical mass of new managers who possess the professionalism and specialist expertise to harness the talents needed to make the civil service economic, effective and efficient.

    By the time the Udoji Commission was inaugurated, Nigeria had also reached the critical juncture where it became imperative to ask whether the Weberian assumptions underlying the British administrative legacy were capable of tackling the urgent governance requirement of a postcolonial society. The wage impasse which the system had been confronting before independence, for the Commission, was a symptom of a deeper administrative malady represented by a bureaucratic culture that had arrested innovation and entrepreneurial creativity in the analysis and implementation of policies. Managerialism therefore provides the most timely and perfect means of making the civil service system align with the goals of national development. The Udoji Commission went on to leverage the global good practice of the time that calls for a new style public service that deploys new management techniques of Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS), Management by Objectives (MBO), the precursor of what is today called the performance management system, project management system, among others, that was totally alien to the Nigerian public service, at the time. The new management architecture that the envisioned management system would have institutionalized would obviously have been inadequate but would have laid a critical substructure that would have set Nigeria on the new productivity paradigm that assisted Malaysia, Singapore, the Asian Tigers and many other developing countries that are within Nigerian global ranking at the time.

    Read Also: IBB’s journey of revisionism, the Nzeribe saga

    The most devastating blow that the civil service suffered were those created not by it but the governance tradition that militarism and “New Federalism” of the post-civil war years created where the rigorous analytical frame that governed development investment got replaced with the unreflective “with immediate effect” command and control governance tradition which created huge process, policy, capacity, performance and resource gaps. The Udoji Commission and its limitations, as well as the succeeding Phillips and Ayida Commissions, could be understood only within this military tradition of which IBB was a significant part. When he assumed office in 1985, one of the most immediate decisions was, according to his admission, the need to “strengthen the practice of the presidential system with clear economic, political, and social reforms to strengthen the nation as a constitutional democracy based on the presidential system.” Assuming the title of a “President” was therefore more than a mere nominal gesture to narcissism. Rather, he said, it was “a summation of our consensus on the need to preserve and strengthen the presidential system and make it work better for the nation.”

    But a nominal title was not enough. A commitment to the presidential system, IBB insisted, defined the necessity of “structuring a reform programme around institutions to make it work.” And given the tension that already was prevalent in the heated polity, IBB surmised, the reforms that must make any significance must be as comprehensive as the administration could make it. And the first act of symbolic gesture was negative: the urgency of the need “to review the various draconian decrees, convictions, and pending cases that bordered on human rights violations.” The Exchange Control (anti-sabotage) Decree 7 and Decree 4 (Public Officers Protection Against False Accusation) had to be significantly reviewed. This was followed by the real positive task of reforming the economy and governance in ways that go beyond “knee-jerk populist reflexes.”

    The task, in governance and economic terms, was therefore to “Remove the government from the role of an enormous money changer to that of an enabler of the appropriate economic environment. We also needed to let the economy, in general, breathe more freely.” It was to liberalize the economy and make government an able enabler rather than occupying the ‘commanding heights of the economy.” Unfortunately for us all, IBB fails to dwell on what could have been a defining dimension of A Journey in Service, the civil service reform framework of the Babangida administration. This is shocking but revealing in itself. One possible reason is that the author subsumed the civil service reform under the broader political reforms: “Our political programme targeted the critical areas of political and socio-cultural restructuring highlighted by the Political Bureau report: the party system, the electoral process, including election administration, the federal structure, the civil service, and the problem of succession, including political leadership.”

    And yet, this fails to do justice to the significance of the Babangida administration and its inheritance of the Dotun Philips Commission from the Buhari-Idiagbon administration. The Phillips Study Team is significant because it had the task of re-organizing the operations of the civil service in terms of professionalism that will eventually align it with the managerial revolution recommended by Udoji. And that reform effort alone cements his administration’s significance in the annals of administrative history in Nigeria, and a fundamental contribution to the cumulation of reform knowledge in Nigeria. IBB already gave the significant intellectual basis of the restructuring that was an imperative: to achieve “national rebirth and future greatness,” there is a need for political and economic restructuring that free up the national space for transformation. And one way to do this, according to him, was cultivate intellectuals: “We needed the input of intellectuals to enlighten the business of government.” There was also the crucial need for the public service as the engine of government business. It beats me how IBB did not see that.

    The Dotun Philips Study Group was constituted by the Buhari-Idiagbon administration in 1985, with the objective of undertaking an interrogation of the structure, mode of operation and strategy of the civil service in the light of contemporary administrative situation, as well as finding means by which the eroded professionalism of the system could be restored. After the 1985 coup, Babangida inherited the study group and transformed it into a full-blown commission whose task was to keep up with the objective of aligning the spirit of managerialism and a professionalized civil service with the form and spirit of presidentialism. This was to be incorporated into the total package of the Civil Service Reforms through a Civil Service Reorganisation Decree No. 43 of 1988. Given the administration’s concern with the rigid Soviet-styled centralization of the economy and the need to open the economy up to market forces, it was only logical that the administration would adopt the critical managerial principle of letting managers manage by having greater control on critical resources. This possesses the capacity to inspire a wholesale decentralization of the HRM function to MDA. The policy choice here is between centralized resource governance for example where the civil service commission wields constitutional powers for recruitment, promotion and discipline exercised at top management levels by the Commission while delegating the powers to MDAs at middle to lower levels.

    The Philips reform was compromised essentially because (a) it took the issues involved in professionalism too far (for instance, by attempting to make a professional out of everybody within the civil service); and (b) its own unique managerial thrust was directed towards integrating the civil service into the presidential system of government, with one unintended consequence being that professionalization turned into politicization through an attempt, for instance, that turned an administrative post (permanent secretary) into a political one (director-general). And yet, this is not a failure because it was a logical reform complements to the short-circuited Udoji Commission recommendation of a public service founded on performance management, and its underlying managerial philosophy was significant in getting the Babangida administration its governance template for transforming national development.

    I insist that an administration is only as good as its reform agenda, both in design and implementation. The Babangida administration gave Nigeria’s reform trajectory one of the key moments in the protracted attempt to translate the gains and efficiencies of a managerial opportunity to a bureaucratic system.

  • IBB: That the youths may know or never forget

    IBB: That the youths may know or never forget

    This week we continue where we left  off with our examination of the Babangida years, the same years he did everything to glamorise in his biography.

    As part of the offering last week, we brought on board Professor Steve Egbo who, a whole 24 ago, was prescient enough to devote a whole chapter of his book to the self-proclaimed evil genius. We bring him back today in a full throttled article which is, however, constricted by space.

    We also bring the views of an active participant in the affairs of those evil days in Nigeria. Wale Adeoye, a multi-award winning journalist who, for his efforts, was also detained at the time, writes in his article

    ‘A Victim’s Review of Babangida’s Journey in Dis-Service” which I described on the Ekitipanupo web portal as a “first rate, analytical chronology of the Babangida years” wherein he wrote:

    “Babangida was also silent on many critical issues of human right violations under his tenure. His regime unleashed one of the worst human right abuses on the students movement while he was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of innocent students apart from creating the nursing bed for violent cultism on Nigerian campuses. I recall 1986 and 1987, the years of clubs, daggers, guns and knives.

    Four students of the Ahmadu Bello University had been killed after his government ordered ‘Kill and Go’ police to invade the campus. The invaders raped and killed some students. It became a national upheaval. At the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, we joined the national resistance.

    I was in the leadership with the late Emma Ezeazu and Chima Ubani. The IBB regime recruited students, trained and armed them. Their duty was to attack, kidnap and maim students’ leaders. At Eni Njoku Hall, where we were having our rally, four students led by a student, now somewhere in the Philippines, stormed the venue and kidnapped a student, Lanre Ehonwa.

    Not satisfied, that night, they stormed the hostel of Chidi Omeje and Kunu Harmony, two radical students. They maimed them. They did the same at other Nigerian University campuses. Many of these students were later recruited to join the State Security Service. At least I saw three of them later in years, who confessed to their atrocities. 

    At ABU, Patrick Wilmot was arrested and deported from Nigeria. What about the kidnap of Omoyele Sowore and his being injected with poison by sponsored armed men? What of Igboku Otu who was stabbed to death by unknown assailants one evening in his private Ikeja home?

    His memory failed him on the disappearance of people like my friend and colleague in The Guardian, Chinedu Offoaro, Prince also of The Guardian, the murder of Tunde Oladepo, Taiwo Lukula and many others across the country as consequences of the successors he bequeathed. Oladepo was killed in the presence of his family. They took away his suits. On the day of his burial, the killers came, putting on the suits they had stolen from their victim. They audaciously stared at Oladepo’s wife who was caught by awe and trembling. He fled the country.  How do we explain the controversial accident that led to the death of ASP Dare who was investigating the death of journalist, Dele Giwa? Can we easily forget the torture of many soldiers like Digifa Werenipre, now leader of Egbesu Assembly, my friend who was kept in underground cell in Kano? What of Col Gabriel Ajayi who was kept in the cemetery for many years, only to be released to the hands of harrowing, cold death? How can one forget Major Nya and others that I met while I was in detention at the Directorate Military Intelligence and reports that people were being shot and taken away for burial in secret places having been picked on the road on suspicion of being anti-government?

    Babangida militarised the mentality of Nigerians through his adoption of violence and brute force, over logic and clear thought.

    Under Babangida, state terrorism was elevated and idolised.

    The people soon began to adopt violence as personal norm. The militaristisation of values, of culture, of politics, of debate, of the family, of the mental state finds expression in the current culture of violence in Nigeria today.  

    The least one can say is that the families of all these victims should band together and sue Babangida so that their estates can, collectively, make a good dent on his N17  freebie, sourced mostly from those who were made to profit, unfairly, from the national patrimony.

    Still On Ibb’s Journey In Dis-service

    In his own contribution this week, Professor Egbo writes:

    Ibrahim Babangida’s memoir, “A Journey in Service”, has continued to generate interest across the nation. Babangida was a man who took Nigeria by storm much more than any before or after him. Forty years after his catastrophic incursion, he has simply refused to allow Nigeria rest. So much has been said in response to, and condemnation of his endless deceit. Perhaps, the launch of his memoir, and the huge cash it raked in for him, is his final act of defiance as he prepares to make his exit from the public stage.

    Read Also: IBB’s journey of revisionism, the Nzeribe saga

    Babangida’s atrocities have been properly chronicled by historians, analysts and commentators over the years, by those who participated in his perfidy; those who merely observed and the millions whose lives were blighted by the contempt and greed of this individual. His biography is an attempt to change the narrative, to re-write history and perhaps, perform one more act of defiance against Nigeria and Nigerians.

    But whatever Babangida may have written, whatever efforts he may have exerted to twist and upend the facts, the truths of his mis-rule and the bungling of Nigeria’s destiny under his watch  remain unhidden and will remain a testimony against him till eternity.

    Of  his numerous atrocities against the fatherland, the greatest was the annulment of June 12 – an election globally acknowledged as  Nigeria’s finest outing ever. June 12, 1993, marked Nigeria’s date with history.

     But sadly, a history that was cruelly aborted.

    The cancellation of that election brought to fore Babangida’s design to keep Nigeria permanently enslaved to his personal whims and caprice. June 12 was the climax of a secret plot by Babangida and his cult of predators to sustain an illegitimate oligarchy that had since lost its bearing.

    As I noted in my book, “Political Soldiering”, the tragedy of June 12 “marked the precariousness of the state of the union called Nigeria, a country of many ethnic nationalities groaning under an ill arrangement where the preponderance of power is arbitrary and hegemonic.”  The success of June 12 election and the deliberate sabotage that followed “marked a date that exhumed the contradictions within the Nigerian contraption which the political class has worked so hard to pretend never existed”.

     June 12 annulment and the upheavals that erupted “marked a culmination of years of frustration and discontent, jealousy and mischief, incompatibility, self destructive anomalies, perfidy and thralldom. It  was another climax of what Ahmadu Bello famously described as ‘the mistake of 1914’.”

    When the heat generated by the gruesome cancellation became unbearable, Babangida sneaked away into the night to plot and scheme for another opportunity. Despite stepping aside, he remained attuned to the vagaries of Nigeria’s political firmament and continued to bid his time. Babangida was a big man – wealthy, ambitious and cunning – and with vast resources at his disposal, he convinced himself that someday, he would be back.

     But his determination to realize his dream of a come-back never materialised,  despite his numerous schemings to bring it about as even the most cunning of men must someday, come to the end of  the road.

    Babangida’s greatest desire was to come back as a civilian president. But despite how much he desired it, schemed for it and plotted for it, he failed.

    Abysmally.

    The chain of events that followed in the wake of June 12 annulment has thrown Nigeria into a bottomless pit, one from which it has been impossible to wriggle out. From trepidatious ING to Abacha’s brutal reign, from the National Assembly Trade Fair to years of misrule, incompetence, ethnic supremacists, religious irredentism, nepotism, banditry, judicial panic, grinding poverty, legendary corruption by both the political class  as well as the private sector, and so many ills, Nigeria has never had it so bad.

    But all put together, General Ibrahim Babangida must be held supremely responsible for whatever tragedy Nigeria has suffered since he stepped in and  stepped aside. This was a man who had the opportunity to do good, but deliberately, and consciously, chose to do so much evil he named himself the evil genius. And he has continued to sit in cross-legged pomposity atop the heap of his evil.

    Otherwise, his memoirs would have been a true confession and an act of penance; a show of remorse and a plea for forgiveness by Nigerians, a people he has so wronged and betrayed.

    Babangida would also have seen this window as an opportunity to seek the forgiveness of the Almighty God who allowed him an opportunity to do good but he  rather chose the opposite.

    That the cream of Nigeria’s political and economic elite gathered in the poshest hotel in Abuja last month on behalf of this badly flawed human being shows our legendary capacity to condone evil. Babangida did not deserve the honor done him by those who heeded  his call.

    He deserves only the courtesy and embrace suitable for a leper.

    The gathering of who is who to honor a man like him shows the moral decadence of our leadership elite. In a country where the laws are of no consequence on the conduct of office holders, success and progress are measured by how much public funds one is able to steal. Here, the institutions created to guard against such grandiose larceny become accessories to the heist.

    Presidential Library? What a joke. What purpose will Babangida’s library serve to generations of deprived, poverty stricken, uneducated, abused and abandoned Nigerians? And make no mistake, Babangida was never a president. He was and will always remain an impostor and a pretender. A usurper.

    Babangida may be having the last laugh; and if that were actually the case,  Nigerians do not have to humor him any longer.

    The gap-toothed general is a chameleon and a vampire. He has no heart.

    No amount of image laundering will convince Nigerians that Babangida is a new creature, that the vulture will turn away from the rotten carcass in disgust or that the he-goat will feel a pang of conscience at the prospect of mounting his own mother..

  • Real reasons IBB annulled 1993 presidential election —Fani-Kayode

    Real reasons IBB annulled 1993 presidential election —Fani-Kayode

    Former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode has given reasons why former head of state, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, yielded to pressure from some military henchmen to annul the June 12, 1993 presidential election.

    The former head of state launched his memoir last week, declaring that Bashorun M.K.O. Abiola won the election and taking responsibility for its annulment.

    But the move did not sit well with many Nigerians who claimed that Babangida took too long to reveal the truth and exhibited cowardice in waiting for major actors in the crisis to die before releasing his book and blaming the annulment on them.

    In a piece he titled A Book that Stirred a Nation, however, Fani-Kayode noted that the decision to yield to the pressure for annulment of the election was the best IBB could have taken for the sake of national piece and safety of many Nigerians, including the winner of the election.

    Read Also: IBB’s justification and the ghost of June 12

    “Had it not been that IBB sheathed his sword, held his peace and conceded to the dark, sinister and evil forces that coordinated, orchestrated, initiated, effected and announced the annulment without his knowledge and behind his back, there would have been a very bloody military coup which would have in turn been violently resisted by the IBB faction and thereby result in a long and protracted civil war,” he said.

    He added that if Babangida had resolved to resist the “dark forces” who wanted the election annulled, he had no doubt that Abiola, his wives, children, key supporters, many of the heroes who were later to become the leaders of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), IBB himself and his key loyalists would have been targeted for assassination.

    “More likely than not few of the main players on both sides, including Abacha, Abiola and Babangida themselves, would have survived the conflagration and the country would have been at war with itself, brother killing brother, for an indefinite period,” he argued.

    • .Full text on Pages 17 & 18
  • Olawepo-Hashim hails IBB for acknowledging past mistakes

    Olawepo-Hashim hails IBB for acknowledging past mistakes

    A businessman and politician, Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, has hailed former military president, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB), for owing up to his past mistakes and offering an apology to the nation.

    In a statement by his media office, Olawepo-Hashim described the move as a crucial step towards national healing and reconciliation.

    The businessman, who was detained without trial under Babangida’s military regime, explained that though he was invited to the launch of IBB’s memoirs, he was indisposed to attend the event.

    He later visited the former military president in Minna, the Niger State capital, to congratulate him on the success of the book presentation, which has sparked widespread debate across the country.

    During his congratulatory visit to IBB yesterday, Olawepo-Hashim noted that rather than focus on the controversial aspects, he emphasised the significance of Babangida’s admission of past mistakes.

    “IBB is not the only leader who made mistakes in office, but not everyone has found the courage and humility to admit their errors. What he has said and written are important testimonies for national reconciliation,” he said.

    Read Also: N30trn Ways and Means: Senate panel accuses CBN of frustrating probe

    According to him, he is neither a praise-singer nor a beneficiary of Babangida’s government.

    Olawepo-Hashiom recalled his strong opposition to IBB’s regime and imprisonment under Decree 2, adding that since 2004, following a mediation brokered by the late Governor Abdulkadir Kure, Prof. Tunde Adeniran, and Dr. Esther Uduehi, he had come to appreciate Babangida’s qualities beyond politics.

    “IBB is an enigma. Despite our differences, I have come to admire his humility, simplicity, and deep love for Nigeria’s unity. To him, national unity is like a religion,” Olawepo-Hashim said.

    The former All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential aspirant revealed IBB’s pivotal behind-the-scenes role in ensuring that Dr. Goodluck Jonathan became President under the Doctrine of Necessity during Nigeria’s 2010 political crisis.

    “He asked me to fly in from London when some interest groups were working to prevent Jonathan from becoming Acting President. I ran errands between him and Baba (ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo) in Ota (Ogun State). I was with IBB till 1 a.m. the night (former President Umar Musa) Yar’Adua was brought back into the country.

    “We worked with Senate Leader Teslim Folarin and Senator Pulka, who represented Jonathan’s camp. The rest, as they say, is history,” he said.

    The businessman stressed the urgent need for Nigerian leaders to acknowledge past mistakes, arguing that a culture of accountability and reconciliation is essential for national progress.