Tag: (II)

  • Building a world class varsity (II)

    As the quest for “world class” gradually becomes the norm, global ranking of universities have equally become very popular and controversial at the same time. Institutions that do not feature in these rankings often pick holes in them despite the criteria they set.  These rankings include: Times Higher Education (THE) Ranking, Academic Ranking of World Universities, Webometrics Ranking, Professional Ranking of World Universities, Newsweek Ranking, and Others.

    Universities’ punch holes in them because it places their graduates in disadvantaged positions in the labour market. Preoccupations about university rankings thus reflect the general recognition that economic growth and global competitiveness are increasingly driven by knowledge and that universities play a key role in that context.

    It is against this backdrop that Mr. Bola Akingbade advised the management of Redeemer’s University to leverage their brand name for desired purposes. Facilitating this will include the following elements: Source of Authority – e.g. roots and origins, recorded achievements and reputation. Functional benefit delivery potential which translates to verifiable evidence of special features that can deliver special experiences is necessary. Also critical is the emotional benefit delivery potential which combines apt description of exactly how the offering will bring about appropriate feelings.

    To make a time tested impact, the brand character and attitude must be clearly defined. This depicts the personality of the brand – particularly the aspect that speaks to the aspirations of the target “customer” (potential undergraduates). The brand values encompass the value associations and specific platform from which the brand can speak authoritatively and the brand essence – a “one-word” summation of what it stands for must be clearly defined.

    He also emphasised that “the need for insightful knowledge of the ‘drivers of choice’ for target customers cannot be overemphasised. The success or otherwise of brand management strongly depends on deep customer knowledge and understanding. This is crucially necessary for the necessary establishment of the value proposition that should represent a perfect fit between the brand and the target customer.”

    Toward this end, a “brand value proposition” is an undertaken by the brand to meet the needs of target customers under terms that are specific and unambiguous. In the case of a university with world class aspirations, the value proposition will spell out in short, concise but clear terms, what the target customers (e.g. students), are to expect if they choose to attend the university for their tertiary education. The value proposition should serve to reinforce target customer resolve to choose the university, over and above all else.

    Mr. Rufai Ladipo, the chief executive officer, Agile Communication, Lagos – who also contributed to the lecture – also harped on some salient requirements that are fundamental in attaining world class status. Brand building – he noted – is the deliberate and skillful application of effort to create a desired perception in someone else’s mind. A potential university brand must therefore be able to attract the necessary quantity and quality of students while still operating the traditional university style. This means “branding the students or in-person experience and differentiating it from competing institutions.”

    In order to achieve this, the branding of the university must transcend the physical campus. As more courses are delivered electronically some of the branding factors that set the school apart such a gorgeous campus, hip environment and others won’t matter anymore, especially to the student living miles away.

    A potential world class varsity should therefore create one unified message based on what makes the institution different; who you are and what you do. What distinct benefit(s) does your school deliver? “Define what you want to stand for, and embrace and preserve both the tangible and intangible elements that make your brand unique. Also note that aside from your proposition is the use of logos, icons etc that also says a lot about your identity, and which can stand alone, even without reference to the name.”

    The route to achieve this is to focus on Public Relations – not advertising – and manage perception that creates a sense of belonging through engagement. Staff, faculty, administrators and students all play a key role in delivering an institution’s brand promise. So, engagement through the institution’s website and social media platforms are necessary, but should be carefully managed by experts.

    Another requirement, according to Ladipo is to “build a brand promise based on academic offerings, student experience, or an institution’s prestige. Develop brand strategies that reflect the emotional and psychological dynamics (alumni giving, staff culture, student experience, recruitment efforts, instructor reputation, ranking, faculty engagement, and community relations) of an education institution as a whole. These dynamics will influence and shape the perception of your brand in the market.”

    Next is to create a brand experience through updated curriculum. Curricula must be relevant in today’s global marketplace through new academic subjects. Institutions must also be aware of the growing population of non-traditional students and aging student population so as to accommodate more online and distant learning as well as continue to offer broader spectrum of student needs. Doing so will strengthen the brand’s position in “the crowded market place.”

    Successful brands know the importance of emotions in the art of connection. A potential world class varsity will therefore build an emotional brand experience that creates loyalty. “If you build it they will come. If the emotional connection between your brand and your prospect is strong, the brand experience will bring active/continued referrals as well as increased profitability to your school.

    Loyalty means higher retention rates as well as reduced marketing costs. Create loyalty by understanding your market segments as well as offering convenient locations/hours, having an employer influence (corporate alliance), pricing, timing, or flexibility with schedules. For example, university of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School recently launched a new brand platform based on the idea that Wharton knowledge fuels action. What a great idea, this will definitely build brand loyalty.”

    Powerful brands understand these matrixes because they know it increases market share and loyalty. The power of brand lies in the minds of students’ perception: what they have learned, heard, felt or seen as a result of their experience over time. Ultimately these students determine what the brand means. The varsity should carry the internal stake holders along: make sure they internalise the brand as well as the vision of the school via solid internal communication as well as providing customised physical collaterals such as T-shirts, note books, bags and other collaterals with the school’s identity.

    As the global environment for tertiary education expands—encompassing not only the traditional student exchanges and scholarly sojourns but also such issues as cross-border investments and market-type competition among institutions—stakeholders must re-evaluate their priorities and expectations. Historically, tertiary education institutions were cultural landmarks for their home nations. They educated their own students, trained their own academic staffs, and stored the cultural and local histories of their regions.

    Their graduates are ambassadors for the university. They are innovative leaders who help people and communities flourish. Some are known for being strong communicators, ethical thinkers and creative problem-solvers with a deep commitment to sustainability and social justice. They are knowledgeable in their disciplines and eager for collaboration and continuous learning. The creative ones among them integrate professional skills with global citizenship, entrepreneurial energy and intellectual curiosity.

    But international pressures, largely the result of global flows of tertiary education resources -funding, ideas, students, and staff – have forced institutions to re-examine their missions. Moreover, these pressures have forced governments – by far the largest funding sources for tertiary education – to re-examine their commitments to and expectations from their tertiary education institutions. One prominent outcome of these has been the rise in league tables and rankings of various sorts and, subsequently, the growing desire to compete for a place at the top of a global hierarchy of tertiary education.

    So the lecture organised by Redeemer’s University, and the highly qualified resource persons that delivered them, was quite apt; foreign varsities have known this “secret” for years. This is the major reason we have hundreds of thousands of Nigerian students studying in foreign varsities. They get what local varsities are not providing.  Will our varsities rise to the occasion in an aggressive and competitive world? Time will tell.

  • The tragedy of the Nigerian youth (II)

    As stakeholders of this country, it is important that we should not leave the affairs of the country to the government alone. Everyone has a coefficient of productivity to give and your productivity is determined by your participation. The world, like Nigeria, has gone through very testing moments in history; hence, we need to deliberate and fashion the way forward in our national history.”

    These were the words of Dr. Christopher Kolade, former Nigerian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom while delivering the opening address at the 2014 BrandiQ symposium with the theme: “Politics, Business & 2015 General Elections: Driving Stakeholder’s Participation Through Deliberative Engagements.”

    I was glad to witness hundreds of undergraduates from the University of Lagos, Redeemers University, Ede, Osun State, Bells University, Ota, Ogun State, Pan Atlantic University Lagos, Lagos State University and Yaba College of Technology, Lagos who actively participated in the symposium. Students from other tertiary institutions across the country attended but not in large numbers like the institutions I mentioned.

    One thing struck me at the event. It may be true that most Nigerian youths are wary of politics because of the exclusionary nature of the brand of politics we play here. However one thing is clear; they want to be part of the process but do not know how to get actively involved.

    Those that get involved are disenchanted by the fact our undergraduates are really not different from party stalwarts that they encounter in places like Mushin, Abule Egba and other hot spots across the country. To their dismay, they find out that their elections on campuses are not different from the party conventions in Nigeria.

    It is therefore sad that our campuses now reproduce the traits of power and corruption that our elders exhibit. It is little wonder that we now only see NANS marching in solidarity with government as opposed to marches against the oppression of Students, joblessness, social conditions, or even Boko Haram. They could not even stage a protest over the job seekers that died in the last immigration recruitment scam!

    How will any positive thinking Nigerian not bemoan the situation where students in our tertiary institutions fall over each other seeking for politicians to adopt all because they want to be “Youth Leader” both within and outside the Campus.

    I grieve to see Student Union Executives reproducing the same corrupt dynamics that are prevalent in the society. Vices like highly corrupted electoral processes, imbibing the same corrupt tendencies of the political elites, appropriation of the paraphernalia of dubious power such as having security men, moving in convoys, joining cult gangs to disrupt lectures and examinations, serving as hit men to eliminate “tough lecturers” are now the norm.

    Is it not therefore strange that the Universities have become graveyards where neither corruption in high places, neglect of students’ conditions are no longer issues? In time past, accommodation crisis, lack of adequate funding for libraries, laboratories, health facilities and other sundry issue are often on the front burner. What Student Leaders should be agitating for are no longer mentioned. How did our Universities deteriorate to graveyards of silence? I am not agitating for protest for the sake of protest, but student Unionism was always about a better life for students. When handled properly, its leadership should be a place of practice for the grooming of leaders of tomorrow.

    Apostle Hayford Alile, former Director General of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) – who was the chief host of the event – reminded the students of his days as an official of the proscribed National Union of Nigerian Students (NUNS) – the forerunner of NANS. He told the audience of how the union was able to confront then Prime Minister of Nigeria, the late Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa over the activities of a former Minister for Foreign Affairs. They did this as students and were assured by the PM that he will do everything possible to ensure that their allegations were looked into and if the minister is found wanting he would not remain in the cabinet.

    True to his words, Apostle Alile said the minister was not returned after a cabinet reshuffle. He thus challenged the students to know that they have power in their hands.

    Dr. Christopher Kolade – in his submission – reminded the audience that democracy is a participatory exercise and should be treated as such. Others speakers who lent their voices include the Guest Lecturer, Prof. Emevwo Biakolo and discussants such as the Editor of The Guardian, Mr. Martin Oloja; the Editor-in-Chief, BusinessWorld, Mr. Ray Echebiri; Former APCON Regisrar, Dr. Josef Bel-Molokwu;  and former Lagos State   Commissioner for the Environment, Dr. Muiz Banire.

    Prof Biakolo who set the tone for the day’s intellectual deliberation examined the Nigerian State and the political malaise bordering on political participation. He proposed that Nigerians and stakeholders mediate and mitigate the areas contestation while also fast-tracking the process of forging a common sense of destiny for the country. “We must also engage politicians seeking our votes to enunciate their contribution in the empowerment of the populace. The secondary mediation role must be seriously done by stakeholders within the media sphere and its other adjuncts that help in shaping public opinion,” he said.

    Responding to some of the pungent issues raised by Prof. Biakolo, one of the discussants, Mr. Echebiri spoke on the impact of politics on business. He gave extensive data from the NSE to show the extent politics, and by extension, government policies, have on the business climate of the country.  “Clearly, the decline in the Nigerian stock market demonstrates that politics affects business. Most foreigners are leaving the country because of the tensed and gloomy prediction about Nigeria on the 2015 elections. Because of this most stock brokers are experiencing difficult times.” He explained.

    Speaking from the context of the media and politics and its impact on the subject matter of driving deliberative engagement, Mr. Oloja, stated that every Journalist and PR practitioner should understand the complex Nigerian history of multicultural diversity.  “It will be suicidal to report Nigeria without understanding the historical nuances of the country. Today, the ubiquity of the social media and other agents of technological innovations have made research a major tool of distinctive journalistic activity. This is because every issue imaginable has been treated and it is only research, analytics and infographics that makes journalism relevant today.”

    He stressed that the use of analytics is not only very vital to journalists but also to politicians who would want to measure the impact of their projects. He stated that whatever gets measured gets attention, Hence, the need for everyone – especially the youth – to embrace the reality of deploying analytics and research in engaging our intellectual enterprise.

    In the same vein, communication expert and strategist, Mrs. Chioma Agwuegbo urged the youths to take advantage of the immense opportunity which the forth-coming election presents. “We cannot make meaningful and optimal contributions to the Nigerian state if all we do is criticise and decry government without taking ownership of the country that belongs to us all. Every youth can influence society positively by fully utilising the opportunity which the social media presents. Some great Nigerian youths like Linda Ikeji, Japheth Omojuwa, Tolu Ogunlesi and others are agents of change in the country today because they have deployed their creative energy through the social media. Social media is a means to an end and not an end in itself.”

    In his presentation, Dr. Muiz Banire stated that the missing link in the Nigerian challenge begins with citizen’s lack of commitment to the Nigerian project. “Our level of engagement starts from belonging to a political party. This is non-negotiable if we are to make any meaningful impact in the political history of Nigeria. There is a huge deficit of quality people in Nigerian politics. Nigerian youths should be actively involved in election activities and political process. Although the issues of god-fathers and candidate imposition makes the challenge even more daunting for the discerning Nigeria youths, all hope is not lost. The Nigerian psyche has been so abused that the average person has a low self-esteem about himself in terms of making meaningful contribution in politics.” This, according to him, shouldn’t be.

    In his closing remark, Dr. Kolade urged the youths to show a more collective and coordinated approach in engaging the political parties and governments. He remarked that only a cohesive and structured citizen political participation can act as a catalyst for improving the lot of Nigeria as a country.

     

     

     

  • NANS wildcard (II)

    Last Thursday, I attended the third edition of the rescheduled Ngozi Agbo Memorial Lecture at the University of Lagos put together by the Press Club of the institution. As the lecture progressed, I took out time to look at the students, many of whom did not even meet the late Campuslife editor who passed away a little over two years ago. This notwithstanding, they deemed it fit to honour a young lady who gave them a platform to air their views, or in the words of one of them, “gave us wings to fly.”

    After the lecture ended, I engaged about ten of them on the recent happenings within the ranks of National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS). The verdict I got from them about their umbrella body was totally negative. They not only frowned at the award given the president, they were equally concerned about the plethora of awards being given to politicians of different hues. They specifically mentioned the so called “Mandela Icon Award” granted Chief Olabode George by the North Central zone of NANS.

    I also had a phone discussion with Yaqub Eleto, the chairman Lagos chapter of NANS. He did not mince words in denouncing the national leadership of the association. Aside the NANS national leadership intellectual collapse, he pointed out that the various structures of NANS – Zonal, State Joint Campus Committees and even, each students’ union – have either sold out to managements or politicians or lack the requisite intellectual wherewithal to lead successful and genuine struggles for students welfare.

    He was piqued by the indiscriminate conferment of awards on politicians by people parading themselves as students. He specifically singled out what he termed a “kangaroo” award granted Bode George which was backed up by a statement released to the media in the aftermath of the award.

    Speaking on behalf of the Lagos chapter, he said he “received the notice with great shock that some students from the north central are gathered at the national theatre to honour Chief Olabode George with Mandela Icon Award and to flag off fund raising for Youth and Students Mobilization for Johnathan 2015 South West Zone. We the members of NANS Lagos Chapter as an exemplary students’ body who believe in due process that before any award could be conferred on any Nigerian it must be pursuant to Article 3 paragraph B NANS constitution adopted at the BUK convention 1982; that 2/3 majority of the congress must have adopted the award and the recipient must have contributed immensely to the association.”

    Eleto revealed that the national body was not even aware of the award conferred on George! This is how low the once prestigious student body has fallen; it is now an all comers affair where students’ who graduated years ago with Masters Degree strive to “gain” admission again, even for a diploma programme so that they can be at the commanding height of the association. These “professional” students are often the ones that pay courtesy calls on politicians and the ones special advisers on youth affairs find attractive because they make their jobs easy. He alleged that “students from the north central zone got N2 million to mobilise members for the award.”

    It is a sad commentary that the Nigerian students’ movement has lost all the radical dispositions it was formerly recognised for. The media is replete with news about in fighting at various levels of NANS leadership. Apart from giving awards to politicians and businessmen, the body is noted for issuing statements in support of one politicians or party or another.

    The sad commentary assumes a higher dimension as the association now “endorses” politicians for elective offices; how this has anything to do with affairs on campuses still leaves more to be desired. Prior to this, the NANS leadership had identified with various anti-student, pro-establishment policies including the controversial acceptance of the hostel privatisation some years ago.

    One can easily remember the Hembe-led NANS leadership’s declaration for Obasanjo’s third term bid. But should we cast all the blame at the doorstep of the students? I don’t think so. Since they are part and parcel of the society, they only mirror the society. This is where integrity comes in. As I often tell students when I come in contact with them, everything about life is not always about money or material things. Life transcends these things. Integrity and a good name can never be bought with money. A corrupt politician or public office holder will forever wear that badge irrespective of whatever whitewash is used to gloss over his or her records.

    Why would UNILAG students decide to honour Ngozi that they never had the privilege of meeting? The answer is simple, she lived for posterity. She birthed an idea that outlived her and opened the doors of opportunities to a number of her former writers some of whom are now employers of labour! This is the major reason she’s been posthumously recognised. This also applies to the thousands out there treading where no one would in their determination to assist the helpless in society.

    They are the ones who see through the lies and deceit of politicians; they are the ones who make our leaders uncomfortable by ensuring they are accountable to the citizens; some, like Nobel laureate, Prof Wole Soyinka have become the conscience of the nation telling the hard truth to our leaders always.

    What I can deduce from the current happenings in NANS is that it has become another pawn in the chessboard of the corrupt ruling class because of the power and speed they have in mobilisation. If I’m right, there are more than four secretariats of NANS each seeking patronage from politicians. The lack of cohesion is evident in a bunch of students coming from the North Central zone to bequeath an award without carrying the Lagos chapter along.

    The crises rocking NANS can be traced to the dwindling powers of labour unions in the country which started with the formation of Trade Union Congress (TUC) from the mainstream NLC during President Obasanjo’s administration. The NLC has always been at the forefront mobilising Nigerians, including students, to oppose unpopular government policies like the removal of controversial fuel subsidies.

    Equally too, the lack of the ideological base of student leadership on the campuses and their failure to come up with coherent economic, social and political solutions to the myriad of problems confronting the Nigerian state led to their isolation from other mass organisations including workers’ movement and subsequent infiltration of their organizations by the pro-state elements. These elements saw a very fertile opening and they cashed in on it.

    Added to this is the conscious role of the school authorities and state agents in destroying the legacy of genuine students’ unionism either by buying over of students’ leaders or using naked force like the cultists, police and victimisation to deal with genuine student activists. Gone are the days when the likes of the late Segun Okeowo, Chris Abashir and others could engage academically with some of the brightest minds. This cannot be said about the present leadership of NANS.

    I still believe that a unified students’ body in the mold of NANS is necessary, but not as it is presently constituted. I’m of the opinion that a genuine Nigerian students’ movement must start afresh with focus on the transformation of our campuses and the society in general. Genuine activists still remaining on campuses must stand up and build a new pan-Nigerian students’ movement that will not only defend the rights of Nigerian youths, but work toward a well-funded and qualitative education sector.

    This won’t make any sense without an ideological rebirth which is necessary for a genuine students’ movement. Again, this won’t be easy as those benefiting from the present disorganised system would do anything in their powers to maintain the status quo; but it is possible.

  • Coke Studio II kicks off today

    Excitement is in the air as Season 2 of one of Africa’s most-anticipated music television series, Coke Studio, kicks off with a music concert at the main auditorium of the Lagos State University (LASU) today.

    Artistes billed to perform at the event include: Olamide ‘Baddo’, Flavour N’abania, Omawumi, Seyi Shay, Waje, Iyanya, Phyno, Chidinma, and Burna Boy.

    Apart from LASU, fans would experience the thrill in nine institutions:  University of Benin (UNIBEN),  (Rivers State University, Port Harcourt), Ibadan (University of Ibadan), Osun (University of Ife), Enugu (Enugu State University, Enugu), (Federal University of Technology, Owerri), (Abia State University); and (Cross Rivers State University, Calabar).

    On the rationale for engaging these artistes, the Brand Manager (Colas), Coca-Cola Nigeria, Femi Ashipa said: “Our decision to feature these artistes was spurred by our consumers’ request. These artistes are currently among the rave-of-the-moment in the Nigerian entertainment industry.”

    According to him, the artistes will not only thrill the audience with their latest songs, but will also perform with some aspiring artistes, who will be chosen from the audience.

    To qualify, an aspiring artiste is required to do a voice drop in a modern, well-equipped mobile studio set up on the Coke Studio tour bus as it moves around different locations in each city. The best voice drop will get a chance to perform alongside the star artistes during the concerts.

    Ashipa said the concerts and the dream opportunity for aspiring music artistes are among the new elements that have been introduced in Coke Studio Season 2 to dial up the experience for Coke’s consumers and other music fans.

    In addition, Coke Studio will also retain its original element – the recorded TV shows, which will be telecast beginning on September 13 on AIT Network, MTV Base, HipTV, NIGEZIE, Sound City and Trace Urban TV.

    The show is made up of eight  45-minute shows. Each episode will showcase unexpected fusions by various groups of artiste to create a unique sound. The show will also provide viewers with behind-the-scenes footage of the artistes’ interactions and experiences on the set.

     

  • After Ade Ajayi, will history end? (II)

    The publication of “Trade and Politics in the Niger Delta, 1830-1885” by the late Professor Kenneth Onwuka Dike, the first indigenous Vice Chancellor of University of Ibadan marked a watershed in Nigerian history. The book, which is fallout of the late professor’s doctoral thesis of the same title, cleared the path for Ade Ajayi and the other historians of the same disposition to follow the lead. But suffice it to say that in terms of what is described as African history for Africans and from the perspective of the African, few will question that the late Prof. Ade Ajayi has a greater part of that glory.

    Dike – who was the first African to achieve the completion of Western historical scholarship – brought his misgiving about the training he received to a positive use with the setting up of the University of Ibadan History department, the Historical Society of Nigeria and the Nigerian National Archives all of which served the evolution of the Ibadan School of History and the project of national transformation.

    Keith A. P. Sandiford, in his book “A Black Studies Primer: Heroes and Heroines of the African Diaspora,” wrote that Dike, as the head of the organizing committee of the First International Congress of Africanists in Ghana in 1963, sought for a strengthened meticulous non-colonial focused African research, and to introduce native speakers to history and for people to view African history through a common eye.

    In his essay “Kenneth Onwuka Dike, ‘Trade And Politics,’ and the Restoration of the African in History,” Ebere Nwaubani argued that Dike was the first modern scholarly proponent of Africanist history. His publications were a watershed in African historiography. “He studied Western history within an intellectual framework that was seriously racial, imperialistic and triumphal. Within the context of such scholarship, it requires nothing less than a radical turn of mind for him to reject Western history and its methodology for a regional one in the service of Nigerian identity.”

    For the benefit of those who might not know, Historiography – simply put – is the scholar’s device for interrogating issues. It refers to a scholarly attempt to recapture or reinvent history as a discipline. In this regard, what is at stake is the necessity of recapturing the history of Nigeria decimated by the colonial ideology and strategy of Eurocentricism.

    What is also needed then was the urgency of recalibrating the methodology for writing that history that would sufficiently serve the purpose of progressive completion of the process of political freedom and independence in order to make the living together of different nationalities to have true meaning.

    To this end, the challenge of rewriting history becomes a critical one since the past of any nation or culture serves as the spectacle for reappraising the possibilities of the future. This is why I quite agree with the words of German politician, Karl-Heinz Hansen: “A people not prepared to face its own history cannot manage to face its own future.”

    As each generation must necessarily write its own history, Dike set the foundation for Ade Ajayi and other prominent historians of that era to build upon. It is thus in this context that one can appreciate the profundity that informed the inauguration of the Ibadan School of History. This school of history was born out of necessity, not only for the reconstruction of a past that lay in ruin under dubious colonial strategy, but also more important because of the exigencies of a postcolonial/post independent present already compromised in all ramifications.

    The Ibadan School evolved essentially as a historiographical challenge to the manner in which Nigerian history had been written by the colonialists. In this sense, we can say that historiography itself commences from the desire to reinterpret the past. According to the American historian Edward W. Bennett; “History, too, has its uses, such as the provision of a ‘usable’ past.” The Ibadan School was therefore motivated by the urgent need to wrest the interpretation of the Nigerian historical past from the intellectual clutch of the premeditated British colonialists.

    As one of Dike’s foot-soldiers that deployed intellectual resources, J. F. Ade-Ajayi alongside historians like, Saburi Biobaku, Adiele Afigbo, Emmanuel A. Ayandele, Tekena Tamuno, Obaro Ikime and foreign historians like Michael Crowder, J. B. Webster, Robert (Abdullahi) Smith and others gave Nigerian and African history meaning. The significance of the Ibadan School of History to the reclamation of a usable past towards charting a smooth path for Nigerian postcolonial development cannot be overemphasized.

    The school echoed a nationalistic historical programme around which history can be reinvented for the sake of Nigeria. In this sense, history would not just be an attempt at an objective agglomeration of facts. It is precisely this tenacity that recommends the Ibadan School of History as a commendable forerunner of the national project in Nigeria.

    With over 60 publications, Ade Ajayi’s scholarly output is formidable by any standard in a country where a scholar has to contend with bureaucratic/political distractions and material deprivations which has grown in the last couple of years. This great scholar’s point of departure always is that history is not just a narrow specialisation or prism to be studied and written for its own glory and sake.

    He believed strongly that the discipline should not even be seen from the prism of merely a search for truth, but that the truths history reveals must be spoken to power, not in the spirit of confrontation, or to make the writer popular for a moment, but to make society better. This was why he approached former President Olusegun Obasanjo on the need for the reintroduction of history to primary and secondary schools. Unfortunately that has not been done to date.

    It is in this spirit that he turned his prodigious scholarship on the processes and problems of national integration, education, public policy and administration, analysing, clarifying and illuminating issues and pointing the way forward for Nigeria.

    Perhaps the best tribute to pay him is to assert that he de-colonised the African narrative by his writings. His area of research focused on Yorubaland, where his intellectual interrogation, curiosity and discoveries were more pronounced. As a historian, he adopted a dialectic approach by not looking at events in isolation, but as parts of bigger historical forces. His dialectical approach equally x-rays societies in broader and deeper perspectives, including the dynamics of cultures, religion, work activities and other ways of life.

    Anyone who goes through his works will find these embedded in such works as “Yoruba Warfare in the Nineteenth Century” and “Christian Missions in Nigeria, 1841-1891.” He was also a collaborationist and an editor.  He co-edited “A thousand Years of West African History,” as well as “History of West Africa” with Michael Crowther.

    The true goals of history are understanding and interpreting the past. Historians have made repeated calls for a new history or a close study of the recent past of the Nigerian history; a past which will be made more germane to the problems and issues confronting us today. For example, one of the problems facing our rulers today is that of ethnic and religious tension all of which resulted from the fact that colonial rule brought people together in new ways and for new purposes as the colonial rulers sought to forge new administrative structures.

    Our nation is among that part of the world now generally referred to as emerging economies or societies in transition. Without a clear sense of identity based on sound historical education, we are in danger of merely drifting along with others. Although we are in the age of globalization; but we must not fail to appreciate that international community is an aggregate of nations, each with its own distinctive character. We failed here because we did not start with a national character; we developed one under stress of circumstances, but with good leadership we can arrive at a common ground.

    In closing out, it will appropriate to reemphasise that we need a clear national ideology that will define a common future for the citizens. A clear example is from Italian history. Their leader provided a clear focus for their effort at unification by interpreting the history of their society and prospecting from it the ideology of Risorpemento (resurgence), the political and social movement that agglomerated different states of the Italian peninsula into the single state of the Kingdom of Italy in the 19th century. The British also have their ideology of unity in diversity which we seem to have copied without actually believing in it.

  • The dilemma of tertiary education (II)

    Some of the challenges confronting universities in Nigeria, especially in the 21st century include, among others, university administration, admission of students, teaching and learning using ICT, violence among students and the increasing wave of crimes in university campuses, coping with the increasing demand for university education as well as funding for research by scholars and equipping universities with facilities to meet the yearnings of the universities communities and beyond.

    Of these challenges, the increasing demand for university education, funding for research by scholars and equipping universities with facilities are critical. Varsities often resort to constantly reviewing fees charged as a way out, but the fees issue – as has become evident – has economic, moral and emotional components which we have been unable to successfully disentangle in Nigeria. In some cases, fees are reviewed without recourse to detailed explanations to why.

    In my piece The fees palaver (June 12, 2014), I did mention the case of Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) Ile Ife, which was closed recently following protest over fees hike which the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Bamitale Omole, said had become inevitable. He said the N5, 300, which the university charged for 10 years was no longer realistic because inflation and the current economic realities had made the charges “ridiculous.”

    OAU, it would be recalled, recently increased the charges of its newly admitted students from N37,150 and N42,150 to N 82,400, N92,700 and N95,700 (acceptance fee inclusive), depending on the faculties. The fees for old students of the institution were also increased from N5,300, N7,800, N10, 300 and N12,800 per session to N19,700, N30,700 and N33,700 for different faculties respectively.

    Unlike other institutions who do not take the pains to explain the rationale for whatever action taken, the OAU authorities at least tried to give reasons – even though those reasons might not go down well in some circles – for the new fee regime. The VC had explained that high inflation rate and efforts of the management to sustain the academic standard in the university necessitated the increment.

    “Precisely during 2004/2005 academic session, the university administration reviewed the charges paid then, which were in line with the economic realities of that time. The charges are still being paid to date after 10 years. It is evident that the current economic realities have made those charges unrealistic and unsustainable.”

    He also dwelled on the issue of purchasing diesel, paying electricity bill and comparing fees paid in other federal universities which made “charges paid by students in OAU not only ridiculously low but have become very unsustainable if our university is to survive.”

    These are cogent reasons unless we pretend not to live in present day Nigeria. Weeks later it appeared the university authorities finally put on their thinking caps and started exploring other ways of grappling with its own dilemma. Cashing in on the enormous goodwill – especially from its alumni members – it sent out emails soliciting for support.

    ”Do you know that Great Ife has over one hundred thousand (100,000) graduates? Imagine if every one of us gave at least N1000 a year, there would be N100 million available annually for the development of our alma mater. Just imagine the ease with which we would build a 500-seater lecture theatre which costs N75 million (approximately)…” part of the email read.

    To me, that is thinking even though it is not a guarantee that all the 100,000 graduates would give or that all the 100,000 are still alive today, but at least someone conceived the idea which might end up addressing some critical needs. Things are changing so rapidly that we need creative tools to address these challenges as is becoming evident that government alone cannot solve all problems.

    The Economist report I made reference to last week pointed out that America government funding per student fell by 27% between 2007 and 2012, while average tuition fees, adjusted for inflation, rose by 20%. In Britain tuition fees, close to zero two decades ago, can reach £9,000 ($15,000 a year). This goes to show the problem is universal, but the critical issue here is others are looking for solutions while we simply abhor change thinking the world is static or waiting to move at our own pace.

    The myriad of unemployed graduates we have in the country has been a wakeup call for years and from all indications, the government has not done enough to address this crisis. We are where we are because policy makers fail to see into the future, especially in the area of employment dynamics. In the same report, the newspaper also pointed out that in the standard model of higher education, people go to university; earn a degree which guarantees them an entry ticket to the professional classes and ultimately a climb up the corporate ladder.

    But as it rightly pointed out, automation is beginning to have the same effect on white-collar jobs as it has on blue-collar ones. It quoted a study from Oxford University which says, 47% of occupations are at risk of being automated in the next few decades. As innovation wipes out some jobs and changes others, people will need to top up their human capital throughout their lives. But a critical look at our varsities and polytechnics show clearly that we are still stuck in the past as the curricula of most of the courses offered in our institutions show. Most are totally at variance with current realities.

    I had the shock of my life recently when a graduate of computer science told me he has never used a computer before! When I probed further to know what instructional material he used during the course of his studies he said they were mainly notes from his lecturers and some textbooks if he had the fortune of coming across them. He is however job hunting looking for the “highest paying” company to work in.

    It is only an individual who lives in denial that would question how technology has forever changed the way things are presently done. But it is sad that most of our institutions are still in the analog age. But the world has moved on, thanks to technology, especially the internet which the magazine predicted “will upend higher education.”

    This is how it described the scenario: “Now the MOOC, or “Massive Open Online Course”, is offering students the chance to listen to star lecturers and get a degree for a fraction of the cost of attending a university.”

    Some readers would be familiar with Coursera, which says it has over 8 million registered users. Though its courses are free, it reportedly bagged its first $1m in revenues last year after introducing the option to pay a fee of between $30 and $100 to have course results certified. Another, Udacity, has teamed up with AT&T and Georgia Tech to offer an online master’s degree in computing, which is less than a third of the cost of the traditional version. Harvard Business School will soon offer an online “pre-MBA” for $1,500.

    This is where the change gets dicey. If this trend catches there is the likelihood it will disrupt different universities that are not fully prepared to embrace the change. The prediction is that the big names will be able to sell their MOOCs around the world. But mediocre universities may suffer the fate of some in the newspapers industry.

    Were the market for higher education to perform in future as that for newspapers has done over the past decade or two, universities’ revenues would fall by more than half, employment in the industry would drop by nearly 30% and more than 700 institutions would shut their doors. The rest would need to reinvent themselves to survive.

    Though painting the scenario from a western perspective, we have a lot to learn here because we now have more federal and state varsities that still depend fully on over stretched public sector funding. The crises we’ve been witnessing in the sector should serve as a wakeup call to creative action.