Tag: impeachment

  • Burden of impeachment in presidential democracy

    Burden of impeachment in presidential democracy

    Unlike under the Westminter model where a democratic parliament wields the power of a vote of no confidence as a critical check on the governor, impeachment is the main tool under the presidential system.

    It is burdensome. The process of removing a governor or deputy governor is fairly lengthy and complex. According to Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the three organs of government – Legislature, Executive and Judiciary – are involved.

    The main ground is gross misconduct. There are two explanations as highlighted by the Constitution.  The first is the description by Section 188(11) which views misconduct as a grave violation or breach of the Constitution. The second is misconduct, or what constitutes misconduct in the opinion of the aggrieved members of the House of Assembly. There could be some inexplicable reasons or allegations uncritically confused with the term.

    The steps outlined in Section 188 are hectic.

    Initiation of allegations.

    A written notice of allegations of gross misconduct, with detailed particulars, must be signed by not less than one-third of the members of the State House of Assembly and presented to the Speaker.

    No fewer than 19 sins of Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara have been identified by the Martin Amaewhule-led Assembly.

    READ ALSO: Kano’s unfolding power game

    Service of notice:

    Within seven days of receiving the notice, the Speaker must serve a copy on the Governor (and on each member of the House of Assembly). Any reply statement from the Governor must also be served on all members.

    The governor cannot evade service. His reply can hardly satisfy the House that had declared the parting of ways. However, the governor may choose not to reply. It has implications.

    Motion to investigate:

    Within 14 days of the notice being presented (whether or not the Governor replies), the House of Assembly has to resolve by motion (without debate) whether the allegation should be investigated. The motion requires support from not less than two-thirds of all members to pass. If it fails, the process ends.

    Appointment of investigative panel:

    If the motion passes, the Speaker will request the Chief Judge of the Rivers State to appoint a seven-member panel of persons of unquestionable integrity (not from public service, legislative houses, or political parties) to investigate the allegations.

    The Chief Judge must be fully satisfied that the impeachment procedures were constitutionally followed before agreeing to fulfill the role allotted to him by the Constitution.

    Panel investigation:

    The Governor has the right to defend himself in person or through legal representatives. The panel must complete its investigation and submit a report to the House of Assembly within three months of appointment.

    During the three months, political expediency can impact on the process. But most reports of this kind are hastly or hurriedly submitted.

    Outcome of panel report:

    If the panel finds the allegations not proved, no further proceedings occur, and the process ends. The implication is that the views of the House of Assembly that alleged wrongdoings and the opinion of panel, which essentially is expected to be neutral, must align.

    If the panel finds the allegations proved, the House considers the report within 14 days.

    Final vote and removal:

    After the report of the panel is submitted to the House of Assembly, it is adopted. But removal can only occur if it is supported by a resolution of not less than two-thirds of all members. Upon adoption, the Governor is removed from office immediately.

    According to Section 188(10), proceedings or determinations of the panel or House cannot be challenged in any court.

    However, the court may render the removal invalid if it is satisfied that there is no compliance with the constitutional process.

  • EXPLAINER: Step-by-step process for impeaching a state governor in Nigeria 

    EXPLAINER: Step-by-step process for impeaching a state governor in Nigeria 

    Impeachment is when elected government officials such as the President, Vice-President, Governors, and Deputy Governors are lawfully removed from office before the end of the tenure of office if found guilty of gross misconduct.

    The legislative arm of government in a nation is saddled with the responsibility of impeaching government executives who are found guilty of gross misconduct.

    The process of impeaching a state governor in Nigeria is contained in Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution.

    Under certain terms and conditions, a Governor may be replaced by another, for example through death, impeachment or if an election is annulled.

    Here are the steps below:

    Step 1: A written allegation of gross misconduct against the governor must be signed by at least one-third of the members of the State House of Assembly and presented to the Speaker of the State House of Assembly.

    Step 2: Within seven days, the Speaker of the House of Assembly is expected to serve the state governor with a copy of the notice of allegation.

    Read Also: Fubara proposes Wed to present budget

    Step 3: The governor has a right to reply to the allegation levelled against him. The state lawmakers must be served each with the response from the governor.

    Step 4: Within 14 days of the presentation of the notice to the Speaker of the House, they shall resolve by motion without any debate whether or not the allegation shall be investigated.

    The motion must be passed by at least a two-thirds majority of all members of the State House of Assembly.

    Step 5: If the motion fails to get two-thirds, the process shall be halted. If the required votes is met, then the Speaker shall within 7 days of the passing of the motion, request the Chief Judge of the State to appoint a Panel to investigate the allegations.

    Members of the panel should not have a political affiliation

    Step 6: Within three months, The panel is expected to report its findings to the State House of Assembly.

    During the proceedings of the Panel, the Governor shall have a right to defend himself or have the right to be defended by a legal practitioner.

    Step 7: Where the allegations of gross misconduct against the governor can not be proven, the impeachment proceedings shall end right there.

    If the allegations can be substantiated, the House of Assembly shall consider the report and a resolution for adoption of the report shall be moved.

    Step 8: At least two-thirds of members of the House of Assembly must vote in support of the resolution to be adopted and the governor shall be impeached while his motion to swear in his deputy shall be moved immediately and adopted.

  • Impeachment: CJ awaits report as Edo panel concludes sitting

    Impeachment: CJ awaits report as Edo panel concludes sitting

    • Shaibu, counsel decline to appear before committee
    • No one can save Deputy Governor now, says Obono-Obla

    The Justice Stephen Omonua (rtd)-led seven-member probe panel was again shunned by Edo State Deputy Governor, Comrade Philip Shaibu, and his lead counsel, Prof. Oladoyin Awoyale (SAN), yesterday, just as they did on Thursday.

    Shaibu and Awoyale’s refusal to appear before members of the panel was hinged on its disobedience of the March 28, 2024 interlocutory order of the Federal High Court (FHC), Abuja, presided over by Justice Inyang Ekwo.

    Rounding off the sitting at Edo State High Court Complex, Benin, Omonua said: “The panel adjourned sitting till today (Friday) for the last time for the respondent (Shaibu/counsel) to present his defence, and the respondent is still not before the panel.

    “The panel is therefore closing its sitting to retire to consider its report as provided by the constitution.”

    The other members of the panel include Prof. Theresa Akpoghome, Oghogho Ayodele Oviasu, Dr. Andrew Oliha, Idris Abdulkareen, President Aighokhian and Mariam Erakhoba Ilavbare.

    Edo State Chief Judge, Justice Daniel Okungbowa, who constituted the panel on March 25 to probe the allegations levelled against Shaibu, is billed to soon receive the report from the seven members for the state’s lawmakers to proceed with Shaibu’s removal or not.

    The inaugural sitting of the panel occurred on Wednesday, with the lead counsel to Shaibu declaring that participating in the proceedings of the panel would amount to “fait accompli,” adding that continued sitting of members amounted to contempt of the court.

    He said that all parties in the FHC Abuja suit ought to obey the interlocutory order, which asked them to show cause why the injunction to maintain status quo ante bellum, pending the hearing and determination of the originating motion on notice, should not be granted.

    The order also directed the parties to appear before the presiding judge on April 8, 2024, to show cause why the relief sought by Shaibu should not be granted, particularly the enforcement of fundamental human rights prayer, tabled before the court by the embattled deputy governor.

    The FHC Abuja suit before Justice Ekwo has as defendants the Inspector-General of Police (IGP); the Department of Security Services (DSS); Omonua, representing himself and the members of the panel; Edo Chief Judge and the state’s House of Assembly.

    Awoyale declared that the panel’s members continuing to sit would amount to undermining the rule of law, and then took the leave of the panel to excuse himself and his client from continuing with the panel’s proceedings.

    The counsel to Edo State House of Assembly, Joe Ohiafi, on Wednesday opened and closed his case, while he insisted that Section 188 (10) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) foreclosed any court from preventing the lawmakers and members of the panel from discharging their constitutional responsibilities.

    Ohiafi noted that only members of the House of Assembly could determine what could constitute gross misconduct, adding that by the deputy governor attaching documents relating to the state’s Executive Council’s meetings to the case he filed last year at the FHC, Abuja, which he later withdrew owing to intervention of eminent Nigerians, he had breached/violated his oath of office, and committed gross misconduct.

    Read Also:

    Omonua, in the panel’s decision, stated that Shaibu’s suit at FHC, Abuja was neither here nor there, while maintaining that the section of Nigeria’s constitution empowered and protected the panel from external interference, and insisted that members of the panel would continue to sit.

    At Thursday’s sitting, the Principal Legal Officer of Edo House of Assembly, N.U. Ibrahim, who initiated the impeachment proceedings, announced his appearance with two other lawyers. 

    Members of the panel then fixed yesterday (Friday) for final adjournment to enable Edo deputy governor or his counsel to defend himself.

    At yesterday’s sitting, Edo House of Assembly was still represented by Ibrahim and two others: Favour Atakpu and William Omogbai.

    It will be recalled that Edo State Chief Judge, on March 25, reconstituted the seven-member panel, which he initially put together on March 22 before two professors, Violet Aigbokhaebo and Boniface Onomion Edegbai, declined to serve on the panel to investigate the allegations as contained in the March 6, 2024 impeachment notice by the members of Edo House of Assembly.

    Okungbowa reconstituted another panel in line with Section 188 (5) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

    Edo lawmakers, on March 19, through a resolution by 19 of the 24 members, directed the chief judge to constitute the seven-member panel.

    Obaseki, a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), is backing a Lagos-based lawyer, Dr. Asue Ighodalo, to succeed him on November 12 this year, while Shaibu insisted that he remained the standard bearer of PDP in Edo for the September 21 governorship election, and declared that he would win the election on account of his popularity and acceptability as a “home boy”.

    No one can save Deputy Governor now, says Obono-Obla

    A lawyer and member of the Tinubu-Shettima Grassroots Independent Campaign Council (TSGICC), Chief Okoi Obono-Obla, has declared that embattled Edo State Deputy Governor, Mr. Phillip Shuaibu is in a corner where no one can help him out of the onslaught that appeared to have been orchestrated by his principal.

    Obono-Obla said the constitution of Nigeria makes the position of Deputy Governor too vulnerable to the whims of a state governor and it may become necessary to consider a constitutional amendment to abolish it altogether.

    Read Also: Impeachment: Probe panel concludes sitting on Shaibu

    Speaking with The Nation in Abuja, Obono-Obla, who was Special Assistant to President Buhari on Prosecution and later, Chairman of the Special Presidential Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property, emphasised that no individual or even a court of law can save Shaibu from his current situation.

    He said: “I feel sorry for the Deputy Governor of Edo State, Philip Shuiabu, because nothing is going to save him from impeachment. Even though Philip Shuiabu has challenged the impeachment proceedings against him in the Federal High Court, I don’t see the Court saving him.

    “The Constitution has ousted the jurisdiction of the court to hear or determine any proceedings of the panel or of the House of Assembly or any matter relating to such proceedings or determination being entertained or questioned in any Court.

    “In law, when the jurisdiction of the Court has been taken away, there is nothing anybody can do. It is the end of the matter.” 

    Speaking further, Obono-Obla noted that a trend of impeachment threats from vindictive governors has been a consistent feature in Nigeria over the years.

    “I feel Sorry for the Deputy Governor of Edo State, Hon. Philip Shuiabu and I think the position of Deputy Governor should be abolished by the Constitution. Rather, the Speaker of the State House of Assembly should succeed any state governor in the event of death or resignation or removal from office of the Governor.

    “This would require a constitutional amendment or alteration abolishing the position of deputy governor, but we must note that since the advent of democratic civil rule in the country, deputy governors have been at the receiving end of imperialistic and despotic governors in the country to the extent that the impeachment procedure is always dangling on the heads of deputy governors like the sword of Damocles.

     “Impeachment is a serious matter and therefore mustn’t be used as a weapon of blackmail against deputy governors. But again we are glaringly seeing how the impeachment procedure is being abused and used against the Deputy Governor of Edo State, Philip Shuiabu, by a vindictive governor,” he said.

    According to the lawyer, it is very easy for anyone to recall the occurrence of similar threats against Deputy Governors in the past, saying that it is a hopeless situation that may continue for a long time if relevant constitutional amendments are not considered.

     “For the past 24 years of the present democratic and constitutional dispensation, we have starkly experienced and seen deputy governors suffer under the threat of impeachment from the hands of wicked state governors; the states’ Houses of Assembly have not been able to stop the sufferings of deputy governors.

    “When President Olusegun Obasanjo wanted to remove his Vice President, Atiku Abubakar in 2006, it was rather the Supreme Court of Nigeria that saved him. But in Bauchi State, during the time of Alhaji Isa Yaguda, the then deputy governor, Senator Garba Mohammed Gadi, was impeached because he refused to decamp to the PDP when Governor Yaguda defected.

    “We saw and experienced the agonising and excruciating experience and oppression that the Deputy Governor of Imo State, Prince Eze Madumere, suffered at the hands of Governor Rochas Okorocha when the Imo State House of Assembly was manipulated to menace him under the guise of impeachment.

     “In Sokoto State in 2018, the then Deputy Governor Ahmed Sokoto had to resign his position because the Sokoto State House of Assembly threatened to impeach him under the machinations of the then Sokoto State Governor, Rt Hon. Aminu Tambuwal.

     “Also in Kano State, in 2018, the Kano Deputy Governor, Prof. Hafiz Abubbakar, resigned on 4 August, 2018, following hints that 31 members of the Kano State House of Assembly had already signed his impeachment notice scheduled to be tabled before the House of Assembly for deliberations. This arose out of political differences between the Deputy Governor and the then Governor, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, over membership of the Kwankwasiya groups.

     “In my own Cross River State in 2003, the then Deputy Governor, Chief John Oyom Okpa, was impeached because he politically fell out with the then Governor Donald Duke.”

  • JUST IN: Impeachment: Ondo speaker withdraws appeal against Aiyedatiwa

    JUST IN: Impeachment: Ondo speaker withdraws appeal against Aiyedatiwa

    The Ondo state House of Assembly and the speaker have withdrawn the appeal at the Court of Appeal Abuja, challenging the interim orders made by the Federal High Court restraining them and others from proceeding with the planned impeachment of the state’s deputy governor, Lucky Aiyedatiwa.

    The appeal also challenged the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to hear the substantive suit by Aiyedatiwa to block his planned impeachment by the state’s Assembly.

    A three-member panel of the appellate court, led by Justice Haruna Tsammani, dismissed the appeal after the lawyer to the House of Assembly and the speaker, Remi Olatubora (SAN) applied to withdraw the appeal.

    Read Also: Aiyedatiwa to preside over Ondo Exco meeting Thursday

    Olatubora, while moving the application for withdrawal, told the court that parties to the dispute had found a political solution to their problem and had signed an armistice to that effect.

    He said the instruction from his clients to withdraw the appeal was in enforcing their own part of the armistice.

    Details shortly…

  • Rivers quakes as governor ‘gets impeachment notice’

    Rivers quakes as governor ‘gets impeachment notice’

    • Assembly splits into two, faction sacks CJ
    • Fubara fires Wike’s loyalists, says I can’t be impeached

    Rivers State was enveloped in confusion yesterday following moves by the House of Assembly to impeach Governor Siminalayi Fubara.

    The crisis between the governor and the divided House of Assembly, barely five months after their inauguration, was triggered by a cold war between Fubara and his benefactor, former Governor Nyesom Wike, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister.

    The embattled governor, who promised to speak out on the crisis before the weekend, said he had never committed any impeachable offence to warrant his removal from office by the lawmakers. 

    He alleged a security breach against his person as the chief security officer of the state.

    As early as 7:30 a.m. yesterday, there was a flurry of activities around the Assembly complex and the Government House.

    Anti-Fubara lawmakers hurriedly removed the House Majority Leader, Edinson Ehie, who is perceived to be a major supporter of the governor.

    Shortly after, Ehie was pronounced the new Speaker in a counter-coup by the other supporters of Fubara in the House of Assembly.

    There are 32 members of the House of Assembly. Twenty-four are the anti-Fubara members, moving for the governor’s impeachment. Eight are for the governor.

    Youths, who took to the streets in support of the governor in Port-Harcourt, decried the activities of the anti-Fubara lawmakers. 

    Trouble started in the state capital on Sunday evening when the House of Assembly was bombed by suspected thugs, who were said to have got wind of the looming impeachment and decided to frustrate it.

    Undeterred by the attack on the hallowed chamber, 24 of the 32 members, led by the Speaker, Martin Amaewhule (Obio-Akpo Constituency 1), gained access to the complex at about 8 am and held plenary.

    The lawmakers used an adjoining room to the chamber, which was not affected by the bomb, to commence the business of the day.

    After removing the Majority Leader, they also suspended four other lawmakers, whom they accused of masterminding the bomb blast.

    Shortly after the lawmakers rose and departed from the House, Fubara was seen trying to gain entrance into the bombed section of the Assembly complex.

    The governor was shielded by some Ijaw youths and about three policemen as he walked into the chaotic Moscow Road leading to the complex.

    There was commotion as teargas canisters were shot and gunshots were fired into the air by security operatives.

    After inspecting the damage done by the fire, Fubara described the bombing as unfortunate, saying he was aware of the plot to impeach him.

    The governor lamented that the security operatives had been compromised, complaining that he was shot at on his way to the Assembly complex.

    Describing himself as a peaceful person, Fubara said he was not planning anything against anybody, urging residents to pray for him.

    Fubara said: “It is unfortunate that we should be experiencing this kind of thing again after about nine years ago when we experienced a similar thing. 

    “I got the information last night and said I must come and see it myself. 

    “Everybody who knows me knows that I’m a peaceful person. I am aware of a plot to impeach me for whatever reason, but I’m not bothered about it. 

    “But I am worried that a facility like this built with taxpayers’ money will be destroyed like this for selfish reasons just to please somebody.”

    The governor said he was ready to be remembered as someone who died for the struggle, describing the impeachment move as rubbish.

    He said: “I’m calling on security agencies, but from what I have seen, the security is even compromised. They were shooting at me directly. 

    “I am not planning anything against anybody. I hear some people gathered here to do whatever. But that is pure rubbish. You cannot sit when there is a problem and say you are doing anything. What are you doing? 

    “I’m the chief security officer. No other person should come and create an alternative place somewhere for the Assembly to seat.”

    Fubara, who braced the chaos, trekked back to the Government House, accompanied by protesting youths, who vowed to stand by him. 

    The crowd of youths, who hailed the governor, surrounded the entrance of the Government House, where Fubara was aided to a podium to address them.

    He commended the youths for standing by him to protect the interest of Rivers.

    He added: “If Siminalayi Fubara is impeached, I won’t be the first, neither will I be the last. But what is important is that any attempt that is not justified will be resisted. 

    “Let them come out and tell Rivers people the offence that I have committed to warrant impeachment.

    “But my happiness this morning is that the people of Rivers State represented by every one of you here are with us. I can go home and sleep. 

    “Let me assure Rivers people that we will continue to defend them, protect you people and ensure that they will enjoy the dividends of democracy.”

    Divided House

    Speaker Martin Amaewhule accused the Majority Leader Edison Ehie, now factional Speaker, of leading the attack and masterminding the bombing of the House of Assembly.

    He said: “It is unfortunate that the government is attacking the legitimate institution of the state, thereby causing crisis and confusion. We cannot sit and allow that.”

    Hours after the anti-Fubara lawmakers announced the impeachment proceedings, the pro-Fubara legislators, led by Ehie, gathered at the Government and held a plenary.

    Ehie, who briefed reporters afterwards, said he had been elected a Speaker.

    Ehie, who was earlier suspended as the Leader of the House by the anti-Fubara lawmakers, commended the lawmakers for electing him.

    He said: “As you can see, the House just rose from plenary and with all humility I must thank my colleagues, 26 Assembly members, who had just elected me as the new Speaker of the 10th Rivers State House of Assembly. 

    “My commitment to Rivers people is that I will be fair and just to all and sundry and I will ensure that the rule of law takes its course. I will not betray my colleagues. I will not betray Rivers people. I will not betray my constituents. 

    “I will also ensure the independence of the Rivers State House of Assembly is adhered to with mutual respect to the judiciary and the executive arm of government.

    “The honourable members that have been suspended as published will also be given a fair hearing. 

    “The committee on information will publish their names and the House urged the Committee on Petitions to give them a fair hearing. 

    “The House has also adjourned sine die (indefinitely) because the Parliamentary Association has served us a notice of indefinite strike from Abuja. So we can’t sit again. 

    “It, therefore, holds that any sitting after now will not hold water because an official notice has been received. I tell people if you have any grievances, approach the court. That is the resolution of the House.”

    Reactions trail impeachment moves 

    Hundreds of youths especially from Ijaw extraction stormed the Government House chanting Ijaw slogans in solidarity with the governor.

    They insisted that they would not allow their kinsman to be disgraced out of office.

    Rivers is a multi-ethnic state, divided into Riverine and upland communities.

    The Coordinator of the Sim Movement, Tonye Cookeygam, called for the protection of democracy, saying the three arms of government must work within the ambit of the law.

    Read Also: Impeachment: Why Akeredolu rejected Aiyedatiwa’s apology – Sources

    He wondered why the legislative arm, without prompting, initiated an impeachment proceeding against the governor, who he said was barely five months in office.

    He said: “I don’t understand what the problem is. The governor has been very loyal to the former governor. The three arms of government should observe the doctrine of separation of power. 

    “Why should the legislative arm of the government without prompting initiate an impeachment process for a man that is barely five months in office?

    “You can see the level of development in the state as regards several projects initiated by the government. I was expecting that the projects initiated by the state government would have been lined up for commissioning.

    “The governor has done well within the period he is in power. He has carried out several projects. 

    “So, on what basis do you want to impeach the governor? On what basis are all these things taking place?

    “We say absolutely no to all that is happening in the state. As Rivers people, we cannot fold our arms and allow a few persons that have ulterior motives to take laws into their hands.”

    The Dr. Theophilus Alaye-led Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) Worldwide condemned the moves to impeach the governor.

    IYC Spokesman, Bedford Benjamin, appealed to the lawmakers to desist from the act, saying it was capable of plunging Rivers into chaos.

    Bedford said the governor should be allowed to run the affairs of the state without interference.

    He said: “The rascality of the Assembly is about to cause an unnecessary bloodbath in the state. The IYC cautions loyalists of tyranny to retrace their steps because we will not allow this illegality to thrive.

    “We also heard that the sitting governor was teargassed by uniformed men. It is totally unacceptable.”

    The Coalition of Nigerian Youth Leaders (CONYL), the umbrella body of Nigerian youths in the geopolitical zones, called on the police headquarters to probe the attack on Rivers governor.

    The President-General, Goodluck Ibem, said the attack on Fubara by security agents with live bullets, teargas and other weapons was a confirmation that they were on a mission to assassinate the governor. 

    The Rivers State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) condemned the destruction of public assets.

    APC spokesman Darlington Nwauju said: “Monday’s arson attack on the hallowed chambers of the state assembly amounts to the desecration of the legislature. 

    “We warn political actors not to jeopardise the fragile security of the state because of their political greed.”

    The leadership of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in Rivers called on both the legislative and executive arms in the state to exercise restraint in the ongoing impasse between them.

    Its chairman, Desmond Akawor, said it was not unaware of the impasse between the two arms of government.

    However, the chapter expressed confidence that the situation would be amicably settled.

    He said: “The party is consulting with elders of the party and other notable personalities in the state to resolve the situation at stake. 

    “We are optimistic that the conflict, which is a family affair, would be resolved amicably at the end of the day.

    “The leadership of the party, therefore, further calls on youths to exercise caution and refuse to use the situation to embark on wanton destruction of state properties, but to maintain the existing peace and tranquillity.

    “We call on the good people of the state to remain calm and await the peaceful resolution of the situation.”

    The Rivers State Police Command said it was on top of the security situation. 

    The Police Public Relations Officer, Grace Iringe-Koko, said: “Full-scale investigation has been launched to unravel the circumstances surrounding the situations and take immediate policing actions against anyone found wanting.”

    PDP governors to meet today over Rivers crisis

    MEMBERS of the PDP Governors’ Forum (PDP-GF) have scheduled an emergency meeting for today, it was learnt last night.

    The governors will meet by 3 pm at the Akwa Ibom State Governor’s Lodge, Asokoro, Abuja, a source confirmed last night.

    In a statement yesterday, the PDP-GF hinted that the meeting might not be unconnected with the ongoing leadership crisis in Rivers.

    Elder statesman Edwin Clark warned of the dire consequences of impeaching  Fubara.

    The Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) leader blamed the crisis rocking Rivers on some vested interests, who he did not name.

    He gave the warning in a statement he issued in reaction to the setting ablaze of the  Assembly on Sunday night.

    Stating that the fire incident arose from the plan to destabilise Rivers and impeach the governor, Clark alleged that Fubara was tear-gassed and was even threatened with being shot at when he visited the Assembly complex after the incident to assess the level of damage.

    “I have been greatly disturbed by the reported developments in Rivers in the last 24 hours.

    “I understand that the intention is to remove the governor, force his deputy, Prof. Ngozi Odu to resign, and install the Speaker of the House of Assembly as the governor.

    “Let me warn strongly that we will not allow that to happen!

    “The consequences would be dire for the stability of the region and for the national economy,’’ Clark charged.

    He noted that Rivers people had suffered enough political crises.

    “The state should not be allowed to degenerate again into its dark past; and the Niger Delta Region by extension,’’ he stated.

    The elder statesman called on President Bola Tinubu to direct security agencies in Rivers to avert any untold crisis in the state.

    He urged the president to act speedily to avert the unfolding crisis in Rivers in the interest of his administration and that of the nation’s democracy.

    Clark warned also that vested interests should not be allowed to do whatever they liked; noting that Nigeria is a democracy and the tenets of constitutional democracy must be upheld by all.

  • Impeachment saga: Ondo lawmakers reach ceasefire agreement

    Impeachment saga: Ondo lawmakers reach ceasefire agreement

    Ondo House of Assembly has agreed to stay action in the ongoing move to impeach the state deputy governor, Lucky Ayiedatiwa.

    A decision to this effect was reached on Tuesday, October 17, after a closed-door meeting with the National Working Committee (NWC) of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) at the party’s national secretariat in Abuja.

    Aiyedatiwa has been under the threat of impeachment by the House over allegations of gross misconduct and has been served with notice of the allegations levelled against him by the lawmakers.

    The meeting which lasted for about two hours had in attendance members of the party’s NWC, the Aminu Bello Masari-led 9-man Reconciliation Committee, party state chairman, Ade Adetimilehin and 18 of the 22 APC lawmakers led by the speaker, Rt. Hon. Oladeji Olamide.

    Addressing newsmen after the meeting the chairman of the reconciliation committee, Aminu Bello Masari said that the national leadership was committed to finding a lasting solution to the crisis in the state.

    The former Kastina state governor further said that all actions towards the impeachment of the deputy governor have been put on hold to enable his committee to reach out to all stakeholders.

    He said: “We are working hard with the House of Assembly and the National leadership of the party to find a lasting solution to the crisis bedevilling our party and the government in Ondo state

    “All actions for the pros and against have been suspended for now to allow the committee to complete its work.

    “The Speaker House of Assembly is here with us, he will collaborate with the leader of the party to see the final stand of the APC National Working Committee.”

    Admitting that the lawmakers were in Abuja at the instance of the national chairman, Abdullahi Ganduje, and the reconciliation committee, Speaker Olamide said the lawmakers have agreed to cooperate with the party in finding a lasting solution to the crisis.

    He said: “We were invited by the National chairman and the chairman of the Reconciliation Committee. We promised to work with the national chairman and the chairman of the reconciliation committee to find a lasting solution to the political crisis in Ondo state.

    We gave a promise that on our part, we are ready to cooperate as an arm of government with the party. At the same time, whenever they want to meet us, we will be of help to the committee.

    “More importantly, we will allow the committee to do their work without hitches. Apart from that, we believe this is the only political solution that will be of help to resolve the crisis in Ondo State.”

    Appreciating all the stakeholders in the crisis for allowing a political solution to the impasse in the state, the APC National Chairman said the decision by the lawmakers to ceasefire showed that they are democrats and committed party faithful.

    Read Also: Court issues arrest warrant for Ondo ex-deputy governor

    Ganduje who said he had received an interim report from the Masari-led committee, disclosed that the reconciliation committed was yet to meet with the embattled deputy governor and his boss, Governor Olwarotimi Akeredolu, but confirmed the ceasefire agreement reached with the lawmakers.

    According to him, “Now, having suspended the impeachment process, they (lawmakers) have created a conducive environment to continue dialoguing. We believe that we will reach a political solution.

    “APC, as a political party, is an institution that is indispensable to democracy. Therefore, apart from our basic function for recruitment of membership, elected officers, and appointed officers, it is our responsibility to see that all the ethics of democracy are followed and crises averted in our government, both at the sub-national level and at the international level.

    “It is a political crisis and we are a political institution. So there’s no way we can fold our arms and see that our children are fighting and we allow them to go like that.”

  • Impeachment: Ganduje, NWC, lawmakers in closed-door meeting in Ondo

    Impeachment: Ganduje, NWC, lawmakers in closed-door meeting in Ondo

    The National Working Committee (NWC) of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is currently interfacing with members of the Ondo State House of Assembly over the impeachment move of the state deputy governor, Lucky Ayiedatiwa.

    Also in the meeting were members of the Aminu Bello Masari-led 9-man reconciliation committee, the state party chairman, Ade Adetimehin.

    Read Also: Oyo APC meets Ganduje in Abuja, pledges support for Tinubu’s administration

    The Abdullahi Umar Ganduje-led executive recently inaugurated the reconciliation committee.

    Details shortly…

  • Impeachment: CSO urges Ondo Assembly to adhere strictly to rule of law

    Impeachment: CSO urges Ondo Assembly to adhere strictly to rule of law

    African Civil Society Forum (AFRICSOF) has expressed concern over the absence of procedural democracy in the impeachment process of the deputy governor of Ondo state, Lucky Ayiedatiwa by the State House of Assembly.

    The group a conglomerate of civil societies in Africa at a press conference in Abuja on Monday cautioned the lawmakers to strictly adhere to and be guided by the rule of law and democratic procedure.

    Addressing newsmen, the chairman of the Governing Board of the forum Dr. Tunji John Asaolu, expressed concern that the impeachment saga is gradually becoming a misused political tool.

    According to Asaolu, “We express our deep concern over the steps taken by the lawmakers to impeach the Deputy Governor of Ondo State, Mr. Lucky Aiyedatiwa, based on allegations. While we do not condone any form of misconduct or impeachment per se, we firmly believe that impeachment proceedings must be conducted in stringent accordance with the law and clear constitutional provisions that govern the country, of Nigeria.

    “In as much as we agreed that the Ondo State House of Assembly is meant to make laws for the state, they should also be mindful of the fact that there is an ongoing Court injunction and the nine-man reconciliation committee under the leadership of HE. Rt. Hon. Aminu Masari, a former governor of Katsina State set up by the All-Progressive Congress (APC) at the National level.

    Read Also: Impeachment: Protesters warn against lawmakers’ muscling

    “On September 26, 2023, the Federal High court seating in Abuja also made orders of injunction restraining the House of Assembly of Ondo State, the Chief Judge of Ondo State, the Ondo Governor and indeed other defendants in the case from taking steps that would lead to the impeachment of the deputy governor.

    “The court made the order to last till the hearing of the Motion on Notice for interlocutory injunction, which is still pending before the court. In consequence, parties would have to await the determination of the court as the orders made remain in force. All these should be taken into consideration and serve as a caution to guide the decision of the Assembly.

    “We strongly oppose the use of legislative chambers as platforms for political witch-hunts or targeted vendettas or wars. We urge all stakeholders involved to ensure that justice is pursued, and constitutional principles are adhered to, rather than allowing personal conflicts and ambitions to overshadow the pursuit of the common good.”

    The group warned that the development should not divert attention from the vital issues of good governance and the well-being of the state’s citizens.

    “The neglect of governance resulting from this political crisis has had a devastating impact on the lives and livelihoods of the people of Ondo State. We condemn this negligence as needless and avoidable, and we call for an immediate refocus on matters that directly affect the state’s fortunes and the welfare of its people.

    “Let it be clear – that AFRICSOF and the people of Ondo State will not give their approval to actions driven by sinister motives aimed at settling personal political scores and undermining the state and its people.

    “We caution against retooling the Ondo State House of Assembly as a mere enforcement arm of executive whims. Any such actions will face steadfast resistance from the people.

    “AFRICSOF emphasizes the need for increased accountability in government and a return to prioritizing issues with a direct impact on the state’s prosperity and the welfare of its people.

    “We call upon all stakeholders, both within and outside of Ondo State, to join us in safeguarding the principles that underpin our democracy, ensuring that Ondo State thrives as a beacon of good governance.

    “We view the actions of the State Assembly as a disservice to the person and office of Governor Rotimi Akeredolu who in his sound mind, will not tolerate the actions of the Speaker of the State Assembly and his co-travellers.

    “The impeachment threat is a mockery of the Governor on his sick bed. How will the Governor feel at the moment, managing his health and hearing of his deputy’s impeachment Threat, it’s a ploy to kill the Governor faster than the ailments he is fighting.

    “We want to caution politicians to desist from activities that may detribalize Nigerian democracy. We encourage them to always imbibe the tenant of democracy and observe the rule of law for the overall interest of the country.”

    Asaolu then called on the Inspector General of Police, the Director General of State Security Service and indeed the Nigerian Judiciary to protect our democracy and ensure its sustainability.

  • U.S. impeachment: trite or dare?

    U.S. impeachment: trite or dare?

    There’s a crassly partisan bent about United States politics that hazards the country’s two-century-old democracy. The perennial tussle between Republicans and Democrats atimes defies rational objectivity and aims purely at partisan advantage, if so at the cost trivializing institutionalised tools of accountability in American political culture like impeachment. That appears to be the case with an impeachment inquiry lately launched by Republican-controlled House of Representatives against President Joe Biden, who is a Democrat.

    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced the impeachment probe of Biden over Republican claims that he profited from his son Hunter Biden’s business deals in places like Ukraine and China when he was vice-president. Biden served as vice-president from 2009 to 2017 under President Barack Obama, and Republicans are plying the argument that Hunter’s business deals constituted an abuse of office on his father’s part. Only that the GOP, as Republicans are known, has so far not found evidence showing that Biden Sr. made money from nor was involved in the son’s ventures. Information being pushed by the Republicans at best suggest there is a perception of conflict of interest on the part of Hunter.

    Read Also: Acquiring entrepreneurial skills for fiscal stability

    In announcing the impeachment probe, McCarthy said the “allegations of abuse of power, obstruction and corruption” warranted further investigation by the House. But analysts find it hard to escape the feeling the Biden probe is in revenge for the double impeachment of former President Donald Trump, who is GOP patron and its likely candidate for the 2024 U.S. presidential election in which Biden is expected to seek re-election. Trump, as president from 2017 to 2021, was twice impeached by Democrats-controlled House: the first time in December 2019 for using presidential power and the prospect of military aid to try arm-twisting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to initiate a criminal probe of Biden, who at the time had emerged his opponent for the 2020 presidential poll; and the second time in January 2021 – one week before his term expired – for desperate attempts to upturn the outcome of that election which favoured Biden.

    In an interview with Megyn Kelly, a former anchor on conservative Fox News, Trump impliedly admitted that the Biden impeachment probe was spurred by revenge. “I think had they not done it to me… perhaps you wouldn’t have it being done to them. And this is going to happen with indictments too,” he said.

    It’s not that even if Biden is impeached, he will be removed from office since votes to convict him won’t reach two-thirds majority in the Democrats-controlled Senate. But he would make unflattering history as the fourth president to be impeached in American history, and the third in the bitterly polarized last quarter-century Shame! 

  • Impeachment: Allow Assembly to perform its functions, say ex-lawmakers

    Impeachment: Allow Assembly to perform its functions, say ex-lawmakers

    Some former lawmakers in Ondo State led by a former deputy speaker, Samuel Aderoboye, have called on the citizens to allow the Ondo State House of Assembly to perform its constitutional functions.

     The former lawmakers said the issuance of notice of gross misconduct to the Deputy Governor, Mr. Lucky Aiyedatiwa, was part of the processes provided by the constitution for the process of carrying out impeachment of the governor or and the deputy governor as clearly spelt out in Section 188.

     A statement issued by the former lawmakers in Akure said the public should be aware that the Assembly would only act on the decision of the panel set up by the chief ludge of the state.

     The statement said the Assembly has only played its constitutional role by sending a notice of gross misconduct to the Deputy Governor, which it said, does not constitute an impeachment.

    According to the statement, “After seven days from the day the house served the Deputy Governor the House will write the Chief Judge of the State to constitute a seven man panel that would look into the allegations, where the Deputy Governor would be allowed to defend himself either personally or through a counsel.

    Read Also: Mercy Eke future husband will be very lucky, says Omashola

     “It is the outcome of this that the house will base its decision on during the impeachment debate if need be.

     “For the avoidance of doubt, it is on record that non of the past Assembly has diligently treated an issue of impeachment as 10th Assembly is doing.

     “The only responsibility that is required of the house is to uphold the tenets of fairness and impartiality in the discharge of their onerous responsibility.

     “The most surprised of it all is the people who are supposed to educate the public on these simple duties of the legislature but who incidentally have now turn themselves to paid advisors. They all know the role they played in the dark days of their various Assemblies.”