Tag: Inec

  • INEC: Bello is APC candidate

    INEC: Bello is APC candidate

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) yesterday said Alhaji Yahaya Bello is the APC governorship candidate for Saturday’s supplementary election.

    He replaces the late Abubakar Audu, who died before the conclusion of the election process.

    The INEC’s Deputy Director, Publicity, Mr Nick Dazang said: “They have sent the name of their replacement candidate, the runner-up in their primaries, that is Yahaya Bello, to the commission”.

    The INEC spokesman assured the people of Kogi State that the commission is fully prepared to conduct both the Kogi Supplementary and Bayelsa governorship elections. Both polls are slated for Saturday,

    According to him: “Commission is committed to conduct the two elections, that is why in respect of Kogi, in spite of what happened, we came out with public notice which invites the APC to submit its replacement candidate for the election”.

    As part of the efforts to ensure a smooth poll in Bayelsa, Dazang said INEC will be hold a stakeholders’ forum in the state today.

    He also added that INEC had concluded the distribution of non-sensitive materials for the Bayelsa poll.

    Dazang said sensitive materials will be moved from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for onward distribution for the Bayelsa election tomorrow.

    “After the stakeholders’ forum, the commission will immediately on Wednesday commence the distribution of sensitive materials in the state. We are inviting the representatives of political parties, their agents, observers, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and the media among others, to witness the distribution of sensitive materials,” he said.

  • Kogi: Court opens hearing today in Wada’s, PDP’s case against INEC

    Kogi: Court opens hearing today in Wada’s, PDP’s case against INEC

    The Federal High Court, Abuja will today open hearing in the suit filed last Thursday by Governor Idris Wada of Kogi State and his party – the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in which they seek to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to declare Wada winner of the inconclusive governorship election held in the state on November 21.

    The nation learnt yesterday that the suit now before justice Gabriel Kolawole has been scheduled for today for mention. It is however not clear if further steps would be taken in the case today because the defendants were yet to file any process as at yesterday.

    INEC, the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the All Progressive Congress (APC) are listed as 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants.

    It is Wada’s contention that in view of the death of the candidate of the APC, Abubkar Audu it was incumbent on INEC to declare him winner of the election, which INEC declared inconclusive.

    He hinged his argument on the ground that he was the only surviving candidate with the majority of lawful votes cast in election held on 21st November 2015.

    He also asked the court to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission to issue him with a Certificate of Return.

    Wada and the PDP also filed another application praying the court to restrain INEC from conducting the December 5th supplementary election.

    The governor is seeking an order of injunction restraining APC from organizing or holding a fresh primary election for the purpose of any ýsupplementary or other election for the Kogi State governorship election 2015.

    He also asked the courtý to declare that APC cannot organize and hold a fresh primary election for the purpose of the supplementary election, having regard to the immutable statutory timeliness provided by enabling sections of the Electoral Act 2010 and the INEC timetable for Kogi Governorship election.

    The plaintiffs asked the court to declare that the AGF was not competent to issue directives to INEC to allow APC to substitute its candidate for the Kogi governorship election after the commencement of the election, and that such directives are null and void for inconsistency with the provisions of the consitituion.

    They urged the court to hold that APC could not lawfully nominate a candidate for the supplementary governorship election slated for the 5th day of December 2015, without a valid and legally cognizable primary election of the APC conducted within the mandatory timeliness specified by the Electroal Act.

    Wada and PDP further asked the court to declare that, “having regards to the provisions of Section 141 of the Electoral Act, 2010, voted scored by a candidate who died during an election cannot be inherited by or transferred to a person who was not a candidate at the said election and who did not participate in all stages of such election, for the purpose of concluding such election.

    The plaintiffs, in a 36-ýparagraph supporting affidavit deposed to by the PDP State Collation Agent for the election, Joe Agada, it was stated that with the demise of APC’s candidate, the two leading candidates became Wada with 199,514 votes and and that of the Labour Party with 8, 756 votes.

    “That I know as a fact that INEC on this basis ought to declare the ýWada the winner of the governorship election of 21st November 2015, being the only surviving candidate with the highest number of votes and scoring 25 per cent of the votes in all the Local Government Areas of the State.”

  • APC picks Bello as Audu’s replacement

    APC picks Bello as Audu’s replacement

    Forwards request to INEC

     Commission confirms receipt of party’s communication

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has confirmed receiving a request by the All Progressives Congress (APC) to replace the late Abubakar Audu’s name with that of Alhaji Yahaya Bello for the supplementary governorship election in Kogi State.

    The confirmation by INEC showed that the APC has settled for Bello as late Audu’s replacement for Saturday’s poll.

    The receipt of the request was confirmed by INEC’s Deputy Director in charge of Publicity, Mr. Nick Dazang.

    He said, “They have sent the name of their replacement candidate, the second runner-up in their primaries, that is Yahaya Bello, to the commission.”

    He, however, failed to disclose when the request was made.

    Dazang assured the people of Kogi that the commission was fully prepared to conduct the Kogi supplementary and Bayelsa governorship elections on Saturday.

    He added, “The commission is committed to conduct the two elections, that is why in respect of kogi, despite what happened, we came out with public notice inviting the APC to submit its replacement candidate for the election.”

     

  • Kogi: Court begins hearing  in Wada, PDP’s suit Tuesday

    Kogi: Court begins hearing in Wada, PDP’s suit Tuesday

    The Federal High Court, Abuja will Tuesday open hearing in the suit filed last Thursday by Governor Idris Wada of Kogi State and his party – the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in which they seek to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to declare Wada winner of the inconclusive governorship election held in the state on November 21.

    The nation learnt Monday that the suit now before Justice Gabriel Kolawole has been scheduled for Tuesday for mention. It is however not clear if further steps would be taken in the case because the defendants were yet to file any process as at Monday.

    INEC, the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the All Progressive Congress (APC) are listed as 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants.

    It is Wada’s contention that in view of the death of the candidate of the APC, Abubkar Audu it was incumbent on INEC to declare him winner of the election, which INEC declared inconclusive.

    He hinged his argument on the ground that he was the only surviving candidate with the majority of lawful votes cast in election held on 21st November 2015.

    He also asked the court to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission to issue him with a Certificate of Return.

    Wada and the PDP also filed another application praying the court to restrain INEC from conducting the December 5th supplementary election.

    The governor is seeking an order of injunction restraining APC from organizing or holding a fresh primary election for the purpose of any ‎supplementary or other election for the Kogi State governorship election 2015.

    He also asked the court‎ to declare that APC cannot organize and hold a fresh primary election for the purpose of the supplementary election, having regard to the immutable statutory timeliness provided by enabling sections of the Electoral Act 2010 and the INEC timetable for Kogi Governorship election.

    The plaintiffs asked the court to declare that the AGF was not competent to issue directives to INEC to allow APC to substitute its candidate for the Kogi governorship election after the commencement of the election and that such directives are null and void for inconsistency with the provisions of the constitution.

    They urged the court to hold that APC could not lawfully nominate a candidate for the supplementary governorship election slated for the 5th day of December 2015, without a valid and legally cognizable primary election of the APC conducted within the mandatory timeliness specified by the Electroal Act.

    Wada and PDP further asked the court to declare that, “having regards to the provisions of Section 141 of the Electoral Act, 2010, votes scored by a candidate who died during an election cannot be inherited by or transferred to a person who was not a candidate at the said election and who did not participate in all stages of such election, for the purpose of concluding such election.

    The plaintiffs, in a 36-‎paragraph  supporting affidavit deposed to by the PDP State Collation Agent for the election, Joe Agada, it was stated that with the demise of APC’s candidate, the two leading candidates became Wada with 199,514 votes  and and that of the Labour Party with 8, 756 votes.

    “That I know as a fact that INEC  on this basis ought to declare Wada the winner of the governorship election of 21st November 2015, being the only surviving candidate with the highest number of votes and scoring 25 per cent of the votes in all the Local Government Areas of the State.”

  • Wada blasts INEC for doing hatchet job on Kogi poll

    Wada blasts INEC for doing hatchet job on Kogi poll

    Governor Idris Wada of Kogi State yesterday accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of carrying out a hatchet job.

    He said he should be declared the winner of the November 21 poll because the death of the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Prince Abubakar Audu , has made him candidate with the highest votes cast.

    He said Abubakar’s votes had died with him.

    The governor made the claims in a statement  by his Chief Communications Manager, Mr. Phrank Shaibu.

    He  said: “Having had more time to study the INEC’s decision; I was left with no choice but to conclude that the commission embarked on a hatchet’s job”.

    He said: “My conclusion was reinforced by the fact that ‘whatever votes Audu scored in the election died with him. INEC simply overreached itself, and I wonder why a body established to be the custodian of the rule of law would ignore the fundamentals of the rule of law in arriving at the decision not to issue him a certificate of return.”

    Wada faulted INEC’s argument that APC’s right to substitution was sustained by the Electoral Act.

    He said the electoral body should know that it is for the court, not the Commission, to determine which course of action is effective or not.

    ”In arriving at a decision, INEC merely carried out the directives of the Attorney-General of the Federation. The AGF was not competent to issue directives to INEC to allow APC to substitute its candidate for the Kogi governorship poll and that such directives were null and void for its inconsistency with the provisions of the constitution.

    ’’To us as a party, the most egregious of the faux pas committed by INEC is  asking the APC to  lawfully nominate a candidate for the supplementary governorship election without a valid and legally cognisable primary election of the party conducted within the mandatory timeliness specified by the Electoral Act.

    ”It is our considered opinion that, INEC, more than any other body, ought to know that having regards to the provisions of Section 141 of the Electoral Act, 2010, votes scored by a candidate who died during an election cannot be inherited by or transferred to a person who was not a candidate at the said election and who did not participate in all stages of such election, for the purpose of concluding such election, “ Shaibu said.

    He said it was on the strength of the position of the Electoral Act on the developments in Kogi State that he has asked the court to compel the INEC to issue him with a certificate of return.

    The statement said the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was “hopeful that the court will issue an order of injunction restraining APC from organising or holding a fresh primary election for the purpose of any supplementary election having regard to the immutable statutory timelines provided by enabling sections of the Electoral Act 2010 and the INEC timetable for Kogi governorship election.”

  • Ex- minister: Jonathan handed over power to avoid bloodshed

    Ex- minister: Jonathan handed over power to avoid bloodshed

    A former Minister of National Planning, Dr. Abubakar Sulaiman, on Sunday said ex-President Goodluck Jonathan handed over to President Muhammadu Buhari to save the lives of many Nigerians.

    He also said Jonathan had sufficient evidence to remove the former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Attahiru Jega, but he exercised restraint.

    Delivering a paper on the 2015 power transition in Nigeria at the annual Zik dinner  lecture  /award in Abuja,  Sulaiman said it was not external pressure that forced Jonathan to hand over to President Buhari.

    Sulaiman said contrary to general belief, there were cases of compromise by INEC

    He said:  “Few months to the general elections, there were calls from some quarters for the sack of the INEC Chairman, Prof. Attairu Jega.

    “There were sufficient grounds for such calls but President Goodluck maintained a position that taking such decision would altercate the process and create an impression which only an insider would understand. There were indeed cases of compromise on the part of the commission, but as the president so wished, let the sleeping dog lies.

    “Invariably, the decision to maintain the status quo in the commission by the administration was one decision that further led credence to the peaceful outcome of the electoral process. We must not forget that the president in his exercise of his constitutional power has the authority to fire the chairman and replace him with any of the National Commissioners to preside over the commission.

    “Nobody should be on the illusion that the president lacked the gut to exercise such power. After all, Gen. Babangida annulled the June 12 election, thereby depriving Chief M.K.O Abiola of his awaiting victory.

    “It is within context of this remarkable gesture and unparallel leadership style of the president that I found it disturbing when the APC led government sometimes grudgingly acknowledged this fact or believed that it was the external pressure that accounted for such political accomplishment.”

    The ex- minister said if Jonathan had wanted to scuttle Buhari’s election, he would have used the incumbency factor.

    He said: “The extent to which a political transition is peaceful and credible depends largely on variance of factors. We have however demonstrated the import of leadership factor has been consequential to the outcome of any electoral process. Is it the leadership that was out to tame the process or the one that respect the sanctity of the electoral body and other agencies?

    “This paper has successfully argued that more than any government in the past, the Jonathan administration has demonstrated penchant for rule of law, freedom and untainted electoral process.

    “The power of a president is such that if he had wanted to truncate the process or manipulate it, he could have done it. Contrary to the opinion of many that perhaps he could not have done it or had no option not to do otherwise.”

  • Wole Olanipekun writes INEC on the conundrum

    Wole Olanipekun writes INEC on the conundrum

    …(I) The election to the office of Governor is regulated by sections 178 and 179 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), while nomination to the office is regulated by section 187 of the same Constitution. Our client believes that election to the office of Governor of Kogi State had been conducted and completed in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution…With much respect to INEC under your very distinguished chairmanship, the reasons given by (NEC for declaring the election as inconclusive are alien to the Constitution and, therefore, unconstitutional. With further respect to INEC, cancellation of election results by it cannot be a ground for declaring any election as inconclusive. INEC is enjoined to declare a winner of an election based on lawful votes cast. Thus, the cancelled results by INEC, for whatever reasons, and assuming without conceding that INEC could legitimately cancel such results, amount to unlawful votes. In effect, INEC cannot declare a well conducted election as inconclusive based on unlawful votes…

    (II) May we draw Mr. Chairman’s attention to the clear and mandatory provision of section 68(1)(c) of the Electoral Act to the effect that any result declared by Returning Officer shall be final and binding, and can only be reviewed or upturned by an Election Tribunal. In effect, the results already announced by INEC are binding, not only on all the parties, but also on INEC itself. We want to believe that INEC is not unaware of binding decisions of our appellate courts on this issue. Furthermore, by the provision of section 181 (1) of the Constitution, our client, who was the deputy governorship candidate or the associate of Prince Abubakar Audu at the already concluded election constitutionally and automatically becomes the governor-elect of the State. With much respect, INEC has no discretion in this matter. May we advise, most humbly, that INEC should not confuse this situation with what is intended in section 33 of the Electoral Act because the situation on ground has nothing to do with changing or substitution of the name of a candidate before election. In fairness to INEC, it had already announced the results of the election, and, as at the time it so did, it honestly claimed ignorance of the death of Prince Abubakar Audu.

    (III) In law and logic, no new candidate can inherit or be a beneficiary of the votes already cast, counted and declared by INEC before that candidate was nominated and purportedly sponsored. Assuming without conceding that INEC is even right to order a supplementary election, the votes already cast, counted and declared on Saturday and Sunday, 21st and 22nd November, 2015 were votes for the joint constitutional ticket of Prince Abubakar Audu and our client. Therefore, no new or ‘supplementary’ candidate can hijack, aggregate, appropriate or inherit the said votes. Assuming further, without conceding, that supplementary election in 91 polling units can hold as being suggested by INEC, it is our client who should be the automatic candidate of the party, since APC cannot conduct primary election for the supplementary election in 91 polling units…

     

    Excerpted from Chief Wole Olanipekun’s letter on behalf of Hon. Faleke to INEC chairman

  • Femi Falana on  the stalemate

    Femi Falana on the stalemate

    …Notwithstanding that there is no provision in the law for the death of a candidate in the middle of an election; the INEC is not totally helpless in the circumstance. Having declared the election inconclusive, the INEC is duty bound to conclude the election within seven days in line with Section 179 of the Constitution. It is submitted that once the results of an election have been declared, whether conclusive or not, the INEC has no power to cancel same, as the power to cancel any result so declared is vested exclusively in the governorship election petition tribunal. As the APC cannot be allowed to substitute or replace the nomination of Mr. Audu at this stage of the electoral process, the INEC is legally bound to conclude the exercise. The question of falling back on the results of the primary election conducted by the APC does not arise as it conflicts with section 179 of the Constitution…

    The 20th amendment to the United States’ Constitution is in pari materia with Section 181 of the Nigerian Constitution as it allows a vice president-elect to become President if the president-elect dies before inauguration…

    In  relying  on the  US experience the INEC is urged to base its decision of the Supreme Court in the case of  Amaechi v INEC (2008) 10 W.R.N. 1, where it was held that elections are won by political parties which sponsored  candidates . Since the APC which sponsored the late Prince Audu  is deemed to have led the PDP by 41,300 votes there is no legal basis for cancelling the results of the election as both the party and the PDP are competent to take part in the supplementary  election to be conducted by the INEC. In other words, the INEC is not legally disabled from concluding the governorship election notwithstanding the unfortunate death of the APC governorship candidate.

    Since, the governorship and deputy-governorship candidates of the APC jointly contested the election pursuant to section 187 of the Constitution, the votes scored by the party in the inconclusive election remain intact and untainted…

     

    Excerpted from Femi Falana’s piece on the subject matter

  • Kogi: Of a soporific INEC and a listless professor – was INEC error a deliberate ethnic plot?

    Kogi: Of a soporific INEC and a listless professor – was INEC error a deliberate ethnic plot?

    If the three INEC commissioners deployed, and the state electoral commissioner suddenly lost concentration, what was a supposedly erudite Professor Kucha thinking about, not knowing there was no way 25, 000 votes can overtake 41, 000?

    Lawyers were at the forefront of the revolution that gave rise to the American declaration of independence. Majority of delegates to the constitutional convention that gave birth to the American independence were lawyers. Britain and America, the two leading democracies in the world were, at the same time, simultaneously led by lawyers. Lawyers were at the vanguard of a new constitution in Ghana. Lawyers led the constitutional reforms in South Africa and Zambia. Nigeria has produced its sizeable number of great lawyers who are untainted by the common vices that afflict ordinary folks. Lawyers are nation builders. They are influential agents of change in the society with prominent responsibility to build practical and pragmatic democracy founded on the Rule of Law and the constitution – Elder Dele Adesina SAN, in Kunle Ogunsakin’s ‘FOR THE LOVE OF THEIR NATION(Lawyers as agents of change in Nigeria).

    Pray, if the above is true, why are some senior Nigerian lawyers, even judges, doing everything to subject the noble profession to outright profanity by putting financial gratification before national interest?

    All of a sudden, it became the fad that a state Election Returning Officer must be a university professor and sitting vice-chancellor. Ordinarily, with their erudition and high profile, you would reckon this is in order and when you factor in the fact that the immediate past Chairman of INEC was both professor and former vice-chancellor, you are forced to concur with its reasonableness. But do their performances meet their high profile? Hardly; not with what Nigerians saw one of them do at the presidential votes collation, literally unable to read what he claimed he wrote personally, and this recent one in Kogi State where Professor Emmanuel Kucha, vice-chancellor, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, was in action . PDP’s reaction, rejecting INEC decision that APC should replace its late candidate with another, did not come as a surprise.  Granted, though, that this decision itself has no backing in the Nigerian constitution, I had, much earlier in the day, foreseen that some opportunistic forces would rapidly step into the electoral conundrum to try to make money. I had consequently written as follows on my Face book wall: ‘ …take the Kogi case which lawyers will soon turn to billion naira briefs representing both sides, for instance, whereas the only thing that needs be cured is that silly mistake by INEC. That is why APC should promptly head to the Supreme Court to get INEC to reverse itself. This is because, if Governor Wada and PDP get ALL the less than 25,000 votes at the intended supplementary election, they will still be losers. Why then should there be any supplementary election? But look through the newspapers or listen to the television networks and all you find are lawyers obfuscating things and confusing everybody’.

    Read the statement by PDP’s  Metuh, and you can see that lawyers are already fast at work,  edging the country to a constitutional crisis which would go all the way to the apex court to  resolve rather than proffering the most reasonable way out in an election that was already won,  and lost, before some complicit INEC officers,  and a listless professor  created an unnecessary logjam.  For truth be told, the Kogi election was already clearly over and so what needs  be cured, now, is the totally unpardonable  mistake of declaring it inconclusive.  But since INEC cannot legally reverse itself, APC should go to court to put a finality to the needless controversy.

    As you read this, the following are the current standing of the two leading parties at the election:  APC – 240, 867,  PDP – 199, 514. Total number of registered voters is 49, 000 while only 25,000 have Permanent Voter Cards. It stands to reason to hold, therefore, that the number of accredited voters cannot be more than 25,000. In a situation, therefore, where the late Audu and APC were leading by 41, 000 votes, if ALL the votes at the proposed supplementary election went to PDP/Wada, they would  be only a runner up and with a win in only five local government areas, a complete no hoper. It needs be noted that apart from having the majority votes, the APC candidate also had the constitutionally prescribed geographical spread. So what exactly is the sense in declaring the election inconclusive? If the three INEC commissioners  deployed, and the state electoral commissioner suddenly lost concentration, what was a supposedly erudite  Professor  Kucha thinking about, not knowing  there was no way 25, 000 votes  can overtake  41, 000?

    And this, exactly, is where I suspect that a grand conspiracy, agreed to by the leading Igala members of both parties, NEVER to allow a non-Igala rule the state comes in.  Governor Wada, with all the intelligence and security resources at his disposal, and particularly at such a sensitive period, cannot, in good conscience, claim ignorance of Audu’s death even within an hour of its happening. That is the point at which I think top Igala politicians must have gone to work on the grounds that it was better an Igala, any Igala at all,  than any minority,  no matter on which party platform. That’s why, I suspect, INEC DELIBERATELY messed up an election that had been won and lost.

    A word then about the PDP and its fishing expedition with Wada reported as heading to court to ask to be declared winner on the laughable grounds that he is the candidate with the highest number of votes alive. Such morbid thoughts from a state governor cannot be laughable at all. It is a shame that not even its massive shellacking at the last presidential election would suffice in taming the PDP and return it to the path of rectitude. Among other claims, the PDP, in its laborious press release, claimed that APC was being permitted to transfer the votes of a dead man – note the arrant insensitivity – to another candidate, easily forgetting that PDP provided the precedent in the transfer of votes at an election. I quote below, how a veteran journalist, Wole Olujobi, captured that episode on ekitipanupo: “One thing strikes me about Metuh’s hallucination in his eagerness to return PDP to winning ways after clearly losing the election. Olisa Metuh ?agonised over transfer of a dead Audu’s votes to another candidate, conveniently forgetting that his own party created history in Nigeria when the votes of a sitting  governor  were transferred to another  person, who neither pasted a campaign poster nor attended a campaign rally to become the governor in Rivers State. I refer here to Celestine Omehia who won an election on the platform of the PDP and was sworn in as the governor before another PDP aspirant went to court, claiming to be the rightful PDP candidate. At the conclusion of that case the Supreme Court held that Amaechi? was the candidate of PDP and ordered that Omehia’s votes be transferred to him on the grounds that the votes belonged to the PDP and whoever won its governorship primary election.  Obviously, Metuh must have suffered a momentary loss of memory to claim as he did’.

    I was almost completing this article when I ran into Professor Lai Olurode’s interview on Channel’s television and I came to perfectly understand why Nigerians have had to endure INEC for so long. According to the Professor of Sociology and former INEC commissioner, in his own reasoning,  all that matters in an election is the register of voters which contains the names of registered voters many of who are, of course, long dead, did not collect permanent voters cards nor would ever come near a polling booth on election day. For him, PVCs are mere INEC internal product with no probative value in an election and, if his incredible thought process is followed, accreditation too, means nothing to the process either. Were these not his totally incredible  postulations, he should have known that with less than 25,000 accredited for the election in the areas where elections were cancelled, there is no magic, except there is an INEC magic, by which PDP can now overtake  APC.  By his thoughts, you would never think Olurode had ever seen the inside of an INEC office. It’s such a shame.

  • PVC may be vulnerable to hacking, CSEAN warns

    PVC may be vulnerable to hacking, CSEAN warns

    National President, Cyber Security Association of Nigeria (CSEAN), Mr. Remi Afon has said the Permanent Voters Card of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) may be vulnerable to hacking.

    Remi said except the commission improves on its cyber security measures, the CR could be hacked by cyber criminals for the benefit of selfish politicians.

    The CSEAN President disclosed this in Abuja at the eNigeria 2015 conference organised by Nigeria Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA).

    In the topic titled, ‘Contending The Next Cyber Security Threat in Nigeria, Hack The Vote’, Afon explained týhat the Android Operating System 4.2.2 currently adopted by INEC was prone to alteration, stressing that a blank card could be used to copy information on an already existing PVC.

    “As politicians and political parties have their eyes and ambitions on general election come 2019, what many do not know is that come election day, hackers could be the ones whose votes have the biggest impact.

    “Android 4.2.2 is known to have multiple vulnerability. Android master key vulnerability is a critical condition that affects an estimated 99 per cent of the android devices in operation. It could allow attackers to use exploit code to easily infect devices with a malware,” Afon said.ý

    ýIn what he described as cryptography, the CSEAN stated that the card reader reads embedded chip on the PVC, shares secret code with the PVC but such “crypto portion can be found and reconstructed.”

    Afon said during the PVC authentication process by the Card Reader, security researchers found that there is a way to perform man-in-the-middle attacks on chip cards by compromising the ýsub process, which determines the authentication required by the CR.