Tag: Inec

  • PVC: INEC planning to decimate Lagos’ voting population, says Fashola

    PVC: INEC planning to decimate Lagos’ voting population, says Fashola

    DESPITE its segregation of the Permanent Voters’ Card (PVC) distribution in Lagos, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) again failed to distribute the cards in some of the remaining nine local governments in the state.

    To redress the situation, the electoral body has directed that voters in some of the affected wards, including that of the State Governor, Mr. Babatunde Fashola, to register afresh.

    The distribution of PVC, which was first scheduled for between November 7 and 9 in the state was carried out in only 11 of the 20 Local Government Areas, while the exercise was scheduled from November 28 to 30 in the remaining nine local governments.

    However, amidst reports ranging from late commencement of the exercise in some local government areas, to outright omission of names on the lists in various wards, the Commission pasted notices in some wards, including the governor’s Ward G3 Unit E002 located at the State Junior Grammar School, Itolo Street, Surulere, while directing the voters to come for fresh registration scheduled to start on December 3.

    The notice pasted on the gate of school reads: “We regret to inform you that those who registered in this polling unit ……do not have Permanent Voters’ Card. Please come back between 3rd and 8th December 2014 for fresh registration”. It was signed INEC, Lagos.

    Reacting to the development after visiting the unit, Fashola expressed disappointment that INEC had chosen a path that could lead to the collapse of the nation’s fledgling democracy, adding that the act was a deliberate attempt to decimate the voting population in the state.

    Fielding questions from newsmen at the Lagos House Marina, the governor described the development as shameful, expressing regrets that when INEC scheduled the exercise for between the 7th and the 9th of November, the state government spent resources to mobilise the people only for the Commission failing to discharge its responsibility.

    “They said the exercise would take place between the 7th and the 9th of November; we mobilised, we spent money. I addressed the state at least not less than twice, we held stakeholders’ meeting just to get people ready. We put all the resources out there only for INEC to change the game,” he lamented.

    He added, “They broke it into two; we tried to understand and accept that they would do 11 and later come to do the remaining nine. Now the nine are not ready, the 11 have been handled in a very unsatisfactory way from the comments that I have received. So, if the governor of the state who was elected cannot even vote, it says a lot about what INEC has really done here.”

    Insisting that voters in the state would participate in the elections “whether Jega likes it or not”, the governor declared, “We will compel them to do their duty, they owe us that much. Just look at the time of Nigerians that have been wasted over the years. That is a lot of productive man-hours lost. That is a lot of income for this nation lost trying to do something as simple as registering ourselves to vote.”

    While appealing to Lagosians to continue to stay on the side of the law, the governor also enjoined them not to be frustrated, adding that the clear inferences to be drawn from INEC’s latest act is that it wants to disenfranchise as many voters as it possibly can in the state.

    Warning the commission to come out clean in its activities towards Lagos State, Fashola declared: “We have facts and I will begin to reveal them. We also have information because we are tracking these things, where our voters’ cards are moving to, and the numbers that are moving across the State. So, INEC had better come clean because we are not going to accept this lying low.”

  • INEC fails to distribute PVC in Fashola’s ward

    INEC fails to distribute PVC in Fashola’s ward

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Friday failed to distribute Permanent Voters Card (PVC) at the Ward G3, State Junior Secondary School, the polling unit of the State Governor, Mr. Babatunde Fashola and his wife, Dame Abimbola.

    Our reporter gathered that some INEC ad-hoc staff had hurriedly pasted a notice yesterday morning to notify voters who had registered in the two wards on Itolo Street that they had no voters’ card.

    The commission said the voters would have to register afresh at a later date.

    The notice pasted at the entrance of the school read: “We regret to inform you that those who registered in this polling unit do not have permanent voters’ cards. Please come back between 3rd and 8th December 2014 for fresh registration”.

    Lagos State Resident Electoral Commissioner, Dr. Adekunle Ogunmola, attributed the development to the loss of date arising from the crash of their computing system.

    “Yes, some of the data captured during the registration in 2010 crashed. This was the reason we lost about 1.4million data for voters. We are embarking on fresh registration for them and others who were unable to register in the 2010 registration”.

    Fashola, who had been skeptical about INEC’s preparedness for the 2015 elections, arrived his polling unit at about 2:05pm to see the notice pasted on the gate.

    Speaking to newsmen, the governor described the situation as a collusion or inefficiency on the path of INEC ahead of the polls.

    He said INEC, with the development, had decided to tread the path of destruction.

    According to the governor, “It’s a shameful path; this is my polling unit, this is where I voted, year after year. This is where I was registered. When INEC said they were ready to do distribution of voters cards, they said it was 7th to 9th of November. later they said they were not going to do all and that the balance will happen between 28th and 30th.

    “So, Surulere was in the balance that was supposed to happen. So we are here today being 28th and this is the notice they surreptitiously came to put here at night. We can’t collect our PVCs.’’

    The governor, however, urged those who face such similar fate to keep their temporary voters cards as it was proof that they were captured in the INEC database.

    “We would wait for INEC because they registered 6.4million of us in 2010, so whatever has happened, at least we have those cards, they can’t run away from us. Whether they like it or not, we would have elections and we would vote in spite of what Jega and his team may be planning”.

    Asked whether he would participate in the fresh voters registration, the governor wondered what the essence of the first registration was since the commission could not produce their PVCs.

    “This is an attempt to decimate our voting population in Lagos; it’s clear now. so everyone who has the temporary voters card must hold it. Those who don’t have who only turned 18, we would provide a means for them to participate in this election”.

    He said he would observe how the commission manages the situation before addressing residents further.

    Some residents, who had gathered at the ward hoping to get their PVCs were left to rue the situation as some wondered if INEC with the continuous hiccups is ready for the polls.

  • INEC postpones PVC distribution, CVR in Kaduna

    INEC postpones PVC distribution, CVR in Kaduna

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has postponed the distribution of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) to December 6 and 8 in Kaduna State.

    The Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) will hold from December 10 till 15 in the state.

    INEC National Commissioner Dr. Chris Iyimoga, in the zone, spoke yesterday at a meeting with stakeholders and political parties.

    The INEC chief said the distribution and collection were postponed because of “technical problems”.

    He urged the stakeholders and political parties to bear with the commission.

    Iyimoga said: “The distribution of the PVCs will now hold from December 6-8, while the Continuous Voters Registration will be from December 10-15.

    “Some of the problems we have are technical and we apologise and appeal for your understanding.”

  • INEC adjusts distribution of voter cards, registration in four states

    INEC adjusts distribution of voter cards, registration in four states

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced an adjustment in the dates for the distribution of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) and the conduct of the Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) exercise in Phase III.

    According to the commission’s daily bulletin, the decision was contained in INEC decision extract dated November 25, 2014 and signed by the Director (Commission’s Secretariat) I. A. Gali.

    The bulletin stated that the distribution of PVCs in Kaduna and Katsina States will take place from Saturday, 6th December to Monday, 8th December 2014.

    The CVR exercise in these two states it further stated will take place from Wednesday, 10th December to Monday, 15th December 2014.

    The Commission also approved that the distribution of PVCs in Niger and Borno States will take place from Friday, 12th December to Sunday, 14th December 2014. The CVR exercise in these two states will take place from Wednesday, 17th December to Monday, 22nd December 2014.

    The distribution of PVCs in Rivers, Nasarawa and the outstanding local governments in Lagos State will take place from Friday, 28th November to Sunday, 30th November 2014 as earlier scheduled.

    The CVR exercise in these states will take place from Wednesday, 3rd December to Monday, 8th December 2014 as earlier scheduled.

     

  • Still on INEC’s abandoned new polling units

    Still on INEC’s abandoned new polling units

    After the announcement a fortnight ago by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), that it has suspended – abandoned, was more like it – its plan to create 30,000 additional polling units until after next year’s general election, it is obviously an academic exercise to still dwell on the subject. But then even academic exercises do have their uses; they do help at least to ensure the triumph of reason over sentiments, even if in the long run.

    And on this subject of new polling units, I have no doubt that what we have seen is a classic case of the triumph of propaganda over fact. This much should be obvious to the reader after a careful consideration of the first reaction reproduced below to my piece on the subject last week. Hakeem Kazeem’s is one of the several I received.

    Kazeem’s, to me, is symptomatic of how statistics can be so easily deployed to bamboozle the credulous. Like so many who have spoken and written about the now abandoned new polling units because of the propaganda that its distribution was meant to favour the North which Professor Attahiru Jega, its chairman, comes from, Kazeem clearly assumes the existing ratio is just, fair and equitable to all sections of the country.

    Even the most casual consideration of the figures in contention shows nothing could be further from the truth. The North, including Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory, has slightly over 40.5 million voters. Its existing polling units (PUs) are 63,368 or roughly 52% of the existing 121,348. The South with 29,856,650 registered voters has 57,981 PUs, roughly 48% of the existing figure. This clearly does injustice to the ratio of the voting population of the North which is 57.5% against the South’s 42.5% of the total of 70,383,428 registered voters.

    This difference between the two regions hides the even more important detail of the distribution of the PUs among the states. In the South only Lagos and Edo have over 600 voters per PU. Delta, Rivers, Ogun, Ebonyi, Akwa Ibom, Abia, Oyo and Cross River less than 600 with Ebonyi, the highest, at 571. The rest have far less than proposed minimum of 450. Indeed, Ekiti (313), Bayelsa (327) and Anambra (387), have less than 400 each.

    The North is a study in contrast. The lowest number per PU is 512 for Kogi, with Jigawa a close second (515) and Gombe a not-so-distant third (545). Kano and Katsina have between 550 and 600. The rest have well over 600, with Plateau clinching the top prize at 791 and Niger not too far behind with 762. However, the platinum medal goes to Abuja which has 1,588!

    What all this meant was that the much ballyhooed increase of about 20,000 for the North as against 8,400 or so for the South would have only altered the current ratio of 52:48 in favour of the North to a new ratio of roughly 55.7:44.3. This would have been more in accord with the spread of the country’s registered voters even though it still not fair and equitable enough. In absolute figures these would have been 83,600 PUs in the North as against 66,440 in the South.

    Clearly the focus on the ratio of 3 to 1 increase in favour of the North, rather on the whole picture, was a deliberate statistical sleight of hand by those afraid of a free and fair election to frighten the unwary into believing there is a plan afoot by INEC to rig the election in favour of any presidential candidate from the North.

    Well, commission has made its decision but it was clearly a decision based on sentiments rather than the facts, as a close reading of some of the reactions to my piece last week reproduced below should convince the reader.

    Sir,

    Your piece dated 19th of November portraying (Professor Attahiru) Jega as a victim of blackmail is jaundiced and misplaced. Granted that the North has a higher population than the South by as much as 5% as claimed by you, does that justify the huge disparity in the additional polling units awarded by Jega to the North as much as ratio 1-3 (over 33%)! Haba Mallam! As a true Muslim where is your sense of justice, equity and fairness?

    +2348023036314

    Hakeem Kazeem,

    Sir,

    Jega may keep promising credible, free and fair elections based on his personal integrity and not that of the institution he is ‘driving’. The surest way to embarrass a professional driver is to hand over a malfunctioning car to him and block all possibilities of the car’s repairs. Let Jega prove otherwise come 2015 elections.

    +2347034483605

    Wankar Daniel.

    Sir,

    I honestly think Jega should resign. The job has done an irreparable damage to his reputation. I used to trust his person and principles. But after what happened in Kaduna, Katsina and Bauchi in the 2011 elections I don’t feel the same about him. The abusive song that appeared after the 2011 elections, though I don’t subscribe to its contents, I share the frustration and anger of the singers.

    +2348033111000

    Dr. M. L. Yahuza.

    Sir,

    You speak as though you do not know the sensitivity of this matter. How many times has the South been short-changed just for peace to reign? You probably got your university education because a higher scouring Southerner was dropped to accommodate your state quota. The list goes on. The North cannot continue to trample roughshod on the South and the Middle-Belt under any guise. Even in states and local government creation it’s either equal or no distribution of new polling units.

    +2347032170069

    Endee Anozie,

    Sir,

    I am a pioneer staff of INEC, now retired. Since the first voter registration was conducted in 1988 or thereabouts, all subsequent voter registration exercises have amounted to simply splitting and spreading the existing polling stations. I am surprised Jega has succumbed to the pranks of Southern ethnic irredentists and chickened out of conducting a routine electoral exercise.

    +2348036177178

    John Tyav,

    Sir,

    I think Jega should have been resolute in creating the additional polling units albeit for a different reason. While Nigerian population figures remain in valid dispute, the large mass of the North is indisputable. The idea of a half empty North suggests some sort of dispersal of the population. So even on the basis of convenient access, if we say we want a polling unit within a comfortable walking distance of every Nigerian, then the North may well have more than tenfold more polling units than the South.

    What is key is finding a way (electronic voting) to ensure VALID voting.

    +2348098050590

    Dr. Ogbuagu,

    Sir,

    It was the late Dr. Abel Goubadia that conducted the 2003 (elections) not Prof. Maurice Iwu as you mentioned in your column.

    +2348036466756

    Muhammad Auta.

    The error was corrected in the last copy I sent to the editors but it apparently failed to meet their deadline. The online editions contained the corrected paragraph which read:

    Obasanjo’s lamentation then was in defence of the terrible record of Professor Maurice Iwu, Jega’s predecessor, in his conduct of the 2007 elections which was more or less universally condemned as hardly free, fair and credible. Obasanjo had replaced the late Mr Abel Goubadia, whose conduct of the 2003 election was adjudged even worse than that of 2007, with Iwu as INEC’s chairman in 2005.

    MH

    Sir,

    Your column is always a delight to read. (However), I only want to correct a point in the 19th November edition. Chief Sunday Afolabi was never an Afenifere member talk less of being a chieftain.

    +2348056119569

    Olalere Isola.

    Sir,

    The late Chief Sunday Afolabi was not an Afenifere chieftain. He fell out with Awo’s political camp in the build up to 1983 general elections. He never returned.

    +2348030490107

    Adebayo Salako.

     

    Re: As President Jonathan declares his 2015 bid…

    Sir,

    In fighting Boko Haram, you do not seem to have any role for Aliyu Gusau and Sambo Dasuki, the Defence Minister and NSA (National Security Adviser). Remember you pestered Owoeye Azazi until he died.  So these two have no questions to answer in this war against insurgency?

    +2348023243751

    Alabi Williams.

    Sir,

    My question to you as a true and sincere Muslim if President Jonathan is to be a Muslim will you ask him to resign?

    +23480328905863.

    Yes, I would. Twice, first, on September 20,2008 and second, December 2, 2009 I said the late President Umaru Yar’adua should resign from his job when it became obvious that he could not cope with the rigours of his office due to his failing health.

    MH

     

     

  • INEC to engage Air Force, Navy for elections

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) said it would engage the services of the Air Force, Navy and other security agencies for security during the general elections.

    The commission’s Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) in Taraba State, Mr. Austin Okojie, spoke yesterday when addressing Batch B corps members at the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) Orientation Camp in Jalingo, the state capital.

    He said the move was necessary given the level of insecurity.

    “The commission is making arrangements with the Air Force, Navy and other security agents to ensure safety of lives and property during the elections.

  • Permanent voter cards: INEC’s might versus citizens’ right?

    Permanent voter cards: INEC’s might versus citizens’ right?

    INEC’s response to queries from citizens who could not find their names and pictures but had with them their temporary cards is nothing more than another indulgence in the culture of excuses.

    The latest controversy on our political landscape is the issue of what the Independent National Electoral Commission calls the Permanent Voter Card. Since INEC’s shoddy work in releasing PVCs to citizens, the country’s political temperature has been raised noticeably. Opposition parties, APC in particular, have justifiably cried foul while image makers for the ruling party at the centre have made frantic efforts to dampen what appears to be a nation-wide opposition to impending disenfranchisement of citizens. INEC itself appears to be less forthcoming on how to resolve the crisis caused by its inefficiency.

    All over the world, the most important ritual of democracy is election. It may come every four years in some countries and every five years in others, but come it must in the character of rituals. The famous claim in democracies that sovereignty belongs to the people is most concretised in electoral democracy: the inalienable right of citizens to choose at constitutionally specified intervals, the persons they want to govern them in the political territory to which they belong as bona fide citizens. Citizens’ right to choose those who rule their country becomes compromised when they are deprived of their right to vote. The right to vote is, first and foremost, represented by unfettered to access to the voter card without which no citizen can cast his/her vote during elections.

    It is a common belief in democracies all over the world that any attempt-intentional or unintentional-that makes citizens feel that their right to choose their leaders has been abridged constitutes an attempt to deny citizens their claim to sovereignty. Such deprivation is perceived as deliberate effort to rob of their citizenship. Denying citizens access to voter cards is a clear case of annulment of citizens’ political and civil rights in a democratic country. Where such happens, concerned citizens have a right to scream, protest, and even go to court. Failure to protest and demonstrate against abridgement of such rights is tantamount on the part of citizens to knowingly committing political suicide.

    However, in the present circumstance of millions of citizens not being able to collect their voter cards from INEC officials, the onus of rectification rests solely on INEC, if the commission is not to be labelled as election rigger. Members of the ruling party and spokespersons for the president should have no role or voice in the matter of INEC’s failure to make voter cards available to citizens without fetters. For the ruling political party to criticise other parties for protesting against INEC’s failure to provide voter cards to citizens as required by law, such ruling party spokespersons give the impression that it aids and abets (or at least condones) the commission in its failure to perform its constitutional function properly.

    As a citizen who registered to vote as required by the country’s electoral law, my experience in M.K.O Abiola Gardens during last week’s release of voter cards convinced me that INEC was not prepared to release voter cards to citizens without fetters. The Commission was absent on the  first day it was billed to release cards, a day set aside as work-free to enable citizens perform their constitutional duty with ease. On the second day when INEC’s agents came, the performance of the agents was abysmally low. The agents were rude to citizens, shouting at them and ordering them around. Citizens who came there with their temporary voter cards (with their pictures on them) were ordered to first go and search for their names among hundreds of names and pictures pasted on the walls.

    Furthermore, when citizens came back to tell the agents that most of the papers had fallen off, they were told rudely to put the papers back on the wall  themselves, if they were truly interested in obtaining their PVCs. When citizens asked for assistance and glue to re-mount the papers on the walls, they were told to bend down and search for their pictures among sheaves of papers on the ground, if they were not ready to put the papers back on the wall. Those who did not see their pictures on the walls or on the ground were told caustically to wait for future announcements in the media about when they should come for re-registration. Those lucky enough to find their names, like me, were made to line up in the sun while the agents groped for cards in trays on and below the table. In the three hours I was there, more people were unable to find their names on the wall than those lucky enough to find theirs.

    The experience of those who were able to find their names is enough to accuse INEC of subtle or covert attempt to rob or deny citizens of their right to vote in the 2015 election. Rights in democracies are not supposed to be given grudgingly. Instead of providing a facile access to the cards for citizens on the day I went to collect my PVC, the agency frustrated citizens and gave the impression that the agents preferred to annoy citizens to quit without receiving their cards. One did not on that day need to be a critical citizen to suspect that INEC agents were more interested in holding on to the permanent voter cards than in giving them to their rightful owners. Otherwise, the culture of service (as low as it is in our country in relation to others) is generally higher than what I observed that day.

    INEC’s response to queries from citizens who could not find their names and pictures but had with them their temporary cards is nothing more than another indulgence in the culture of excuses. “Losing over one million names on the computer” is reminiscent of NEPA’s excuse of power outage coming from too much water during the rainy season and too little water during the dry season. In other countries where governments and their agencies have been made (or are in the habit of) respecting citizens, there would have been announcements of the loss of one million names to the computer well ahead, to prepare citizens for the frustration that might arise at the point of collecting voter cards. In addition, a complaint and rectification table would have been created to solve problems of those who did not find their names on the same day and at the same venue. Scheduling another time to do this appears designed to make the process cumbersome and frustrating to citizens, with the ultimate goal or hope discouraging them from fulfilling their civic duties.

    There are some issues that INEC needs to clarify for citizens. When did the agency realise that it had lost over one million names? What type of computer and software does the agency use that has no in-built device to prevent such huge loss? Were handlers of such computers properly trained or were they just irresponsible? Why has the agency not chosen to input the names that were lost from the master records in their headquarters long before the date to release cards to citizens? Why did INEC not announce and publicise all the names purportedly lost well ahead of the time for release of PVCs? Why did INEC wait till a time so close to the election to make permanent voter cards available to citizens? What is to be gained or lost if citizens with their temporary cards are allowed to use them to vote in 2015, instead of insisting that they must come back to do another registration, realising that the registration they did about four years ago had miscarried under the watch of INEC? In a country where all other important documents: passport and driver’s licence are not permanent, why is the voter card being made permanent and not renewable like other civic documents, as it is done in many other democracies? How can INEC guarantee that no citizen with a copy of his/her temporary card will be prevented from exercising the right to vote three months from now, should they still be unable to obtain INEC’s permanent voter cards?

    Political party leaders who went to complain and protest on behalf of citizens about the injustice and danger in the shoddiness of INEC with respect to providing all duly registered citizens with their voter cards have shown good leadership. There is nothing partisan about insisting that citizens, regardless of their party affiliation, must be given the opportunity at elections to indicate their choice. There is everything wrong with an agency charged with protecting such right to act– knowingly or unknowingly – as an agent to deprive citizens of their right to vote. Political party leaders also need to encourage and support citizens to protect their right to vote, as such protection is better handled by the aggrieved, through litigation-individual or class action.

  • 2015: Inec sets up 15 standing committees

    2015: Inec sets up 15 standing committees

    Ahead of the 2015 general elections, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) yesterday announced the setting up of 15 standing committees to superintend over the affairs of the commission.

    The commission, had in 2010, barely one month after it was inaugurated (on  June 30, 2010), set up 14 standing committees to oversee the affairs of the commission.

    According to a memo dated November 13 and signed by the Secretary to the commission, Mrs Augusta C. Ogakwu, the 15 committees came into effect on Monday,  November 17, precisely 89 days to the 2015 general elections.

    The standing committees are: Appointments, Promotion and Discipline Committee (APD);  Board of Survey and Technical Equipment Acquisition Committee (BOSTEAC);  Board of Electoral Institute (TEI);  Election Observation and Party Monitoring Committee (EPMC);  Estate, Works and Transport Committee;  Finance and General Purpose Committee);  Health and Welfare Committee (HWC);  Information Technology and Voter Registration Committee (ITVRC);  Information and Voter Registration Committee (IVEC);  Legal Services, Clearance and Complaints Committee (LSC);  Electoral Operations and Logistics Committee (EOLC);  Outreach and Partnerships Committee (OPC);  Planning, Monitoring and Strategy Committee (PMSC);  Security Committee;  Tenders Board).

    Members of the standing committees are: Appointments, Promotion and Discipline Committee (APDC):  Amb. L. Nwuruku (SE), Chairman;  Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE), other members are  Dr. Chris Iyimoga (NC); Mrs. Amina B. Zakari (NW);  Prof. Lai Olurode (SW), and Mrs. Thelma Iremiren (SS).

      Board of Survey and Technical Equipment Acquisi-tion Committee (BOSTEAC) has as members:  Amb. L. Nwuruku (SE), Ag. Chairman;  Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE); Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE); Vacant (SW); Amb. Ahmed Wali (NW); and Dr. Ishmael Igbani (SS),

      Board of Electoral Institute (TEI)  Dr. Ishmael J. Igbani (SS), Chairman;  no name yet for South West;  Mrs. Amina B. Zakari (NW);  Amb. L. Nwuruku (SE);  Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE);  and (vi.) Dr. A.S. Oniyangi (NC); Election Observation and Party Monitoring Committee (EPMC);  Prof. Lai Olurode (SW), Chairman; Col. M.K. Hammanga (rtd) (NE); Amb. A.M. Wali (NW); Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE); Mrs. Thelma Iremiren (SS); and Dr. Chris O. Iyimoga (NC).

      Estate, Works and Transport Committee (EWTC): Col. M.K. Hammanga (rtd) NE), Chairman; Dr. A.S. Oniyangi (NC); Vacant (SW);  Mrs. Amina B. Zakari (NW); Mrs. Thelma Iremiren (SS);  and  Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE).

      Finance and General Purpose Committee (FGPC): Prof. Attahiru M. Jega (NW), Chairman; Dr. Ishmael J. Igbani (SS);  Prof. Lai Olurode (SW); Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE); Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE);  Dr. A.S. Oniyangi (NC);Mrs. Aminu B. Zakari (NW).

      Health and Welfare Committee (HWC):  Dr. A.S. Oniyangi (NC), Chairman; Dr. Ishmael J. Igbani (SS); Amb. L. Nwuruku (SE);Vacant (SW); Col. M.K. Hammanga (rtd) (NE);  and Amb. Ahmed Wali (NW).

      Information Technology and Voter Registration Committee (ITVRC): INEC Chairman,  Prof. Attahiru M. Jega (NW) is the Chairman; Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE);  Mrs. Thelma Iremiren (SS);  Amb. L. Nwuruku (SE); Prof. Lai Olurode (SW); Dr. Chris Iyimoga (NC); and Amb. A.M. Wali (NW).

      Information and Voter Education Committee (IVEC):Dr. Chris Iyimoga (NC), Chairman; (Amb. A.M. Wali (NW),  Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE); Dr. Ishmael J. Igbani (SS);  Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE);and Vacant (SW).

      Legal Services, Clearance and Complaints Committee (LSC): Mrs. Thelma Iremiren (SS), Chairperson;  Amb. L. Nwuruku (SE); Col. M.K. Hammanga (rtd) (NE); Amb. A.M. Wali (NW); Dr. A. Oniyangi (NC);  and Vacant (SW).

    Electoral Operations and Logistics Committee (OLC): Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE), Chairman; Mrs. Amina B. Zakari (NW) Vacant (SW), Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE); Dr. Chris O. Iyimoga (NC); and Mrs. Thelma Iremiren (SS).

    Outreach and Partnerships Committee (OPC): Mrs Gladys Nwafor (SE), Chairperson;  Prof. Lai Olurode (SW); Amb. A.M. Wali (NW); Dr. Chris O. Iyimoga (NC);  Col M.K. Hammanga (rtd) (NE);  and Mrs. Thelma Iremiren (SS).

      Planning, Monitoring and Strategy Committee (PMSC): Mrs. Amina B. Zakari (NW), Chairperson; Mrs Thelma Iremiren (SS);  Dr. Chris Iyimoga (NC);  Dr. (Engr.) Nuru Yakubu (NE); Vacant (SW); and Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE).

      Security Committee (SC):  Prof. Attahiru M. Jega (NW), Chairman; Dr. Ishmael J. Igbani (SS);  Mrs. Gladys N. Nwafor (SE); Prof. Lai Olurode (SW);  Col. M.K. Hammanga (rtd) (NE); Dr. A.S. Oniyangi (NC), and Mrs Amina B. Zakari (NW).

      Tenders Board (TB): Amb. Ahmed Wali (NW), Chairman; Col. M.K. Hammanga (rtd) (NE);  Prof. Lai Olurode (SW);  Dr. Ishmael J. Igbani (SS) and Dr. A.S. Oniyangi (NC).

  • Senate defers action on emergency

    Senate defers action on emergency

    Senators failed again yesterday to agree on President Goodluck Jonathan’s request for an extension of the state of emergency in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe states.

    The debate on the presidential request started on Tuesday with most senators from the North stoutly opposing the extension.

    Senators, after more than two hours, resolved to continue the discussion on the controversial request today

    The lawmakers also resolved to invite the Service Chiefs for discussion.

    The Senate also mandated Senate President David Mark is to contact governors of the affected states for more information and for their input.

    After the session, Mark said: “The Senate in executive session discussed the letter from Mr. President on the extension of the state of emergency in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe States. We had a very robust and detailed discussion and we will continue the discussion tomorrow (today).”

    The Senate President asked whether what he said was a true reflection of what transpired in the Executive Session.

    Senators answered in the affirmative.

    Mark also said “the Senate resolved that we will invite the Service Chiefs to appear before the Senate and be part of our discussion tomorrow (today).”

    He adjourned plenary till today.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Information, Media and Public Affairs, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe, threw more light on the executive session.

    Abaribe said “the discussion was very frank, robust and sometimes very acrimonious”.

    He said the governors of the affected states would be contacted by the Senate President for more information.

    The information offered by the governors, he said, would assist the Senate to arrive at an acceptable decision.

    He dismissed the allegation that the Presidency brought money to influence the lawmakers to approve the request.

    Abaribe, who described the allegation of bribery as “utter rubbish”,  noted that if senators had been induced to approve the request, they would they have  continued to debate the issue.

    Abaribe  was optimistic of a breakthrough today after members might have armed themselves with information.

    A source at the closed session said the chamber was charged throughout the debate.

    He said some senators, especially those opposed to granting the President’s request, were combative in their approach to the debate.

    Those opposed to extension of emergency rule, he said, refused to shift ground “even after what appeared to be superior argument by those in support of the President’s request”.

    He said: “By and large, the state of emergency will be extended. There may be no alternative than to grant the President’s request. We appreciate the position of those opposed to the request but there may be no alternative than to approve the request.”

    Senate Ahmed Lawan (Yobe North) said: “Many of us are opposed to it, particularly I am vehemently opposed to it. I believe that we should explore other avenues but some other people feel differently and the discussion continues tomorrow (today).

    “Let’s see; could the president under Section 218 not use the military to fight insurgency in the Northeast? Was it not done in Niger Delta when insurgency was taking place in the Niger Delta? Was there state of emergency in the Niger Delta before the operations of the military were undertaken and successfully too?

    On alleged financial inducement to senators, Lawan said: “I am opposed to the state of emergency, so maybe if there was money it was never extended to me.”

  • INEC staff caught registering voters in PDP chieftain’s residence

    An ad-hoc staff of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) simply identified as Nnamdi was on Tuesday caught registering some prospective voters at the resident of a Peoples Democratic Party chieftain at Ebo community in Oredo local government area of Edo State.

    The PDP chieftain identified as Austin is the chairman of Ebo Community Development Association.

    The Nation gathered that the ad-hoc staff was conducting voter registration at Ovbo Primary School, in Ward 11, Ogba 111.

    The bubble burst when some persons lured to be registered informed some All Progressive Congress chieftains about the illegal registration.

    Some APC leaders led by the state Youth Leader, Osakpamwan Eriyo, stormed the residence and after they forcefully gained entrance, found two bags containing laptop, NYSC uniforms and 58 temporary voters’ cards.

    Osakpamwan said he was informed that some persons in Ward 11 were diverting voters to another place for registration and he went there with some policemen.

    He said, “When we got there, the gate of the residence was locked but we didn’t know that there was another entrance at the back. We forced our way in and saw a bag containing a laptop, 58 temporary voters’ cards and uniform of a youth corper.”

    “We are warning the PDP that this state belongs to APC. INEC should do the right thing. We are ready for free and fair elections. The APC will not allow any illegality in this state.”

    An Electoral Officer in Oredo who gave his name as Olawale confirmed that Nnamdi was sent to register people in the area.

    He said the police would be invited to investigate the matter and placed a call to Nnamdi but another person picked the call.