Tag: International Criminal Court (ICC)

  • ICC finds Sudan ex-militia leader guilty of war crimes in Darfur

    ICC finds Sudan ex-militia leader guilty of war crimes in Darfur

    The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has convicted Ali Muhammad Ali Abd–Al-Rahman, a leader of Sudan’s notorious Janjaweed militia, for his role in atrocities committed during the genocide in the western region of Darfur more than 20 years ago.

    It is the court’s first conviction for crimes in Darfur, where similar violence has flared again amid Sudan’s ongoing civil war.

    Judges found that mass killings and sexual violence were part of a plan backed by Sudan’s former government to crush a rebellion by African ethnic groups in the western region. Abd–Al-Rahman, also known by the nom de guerre Ali Kushayb, was found guilty on 27 counts, carried out between August 2003 and April 2004. He remained silent as the verdict was read out by presiding judge, Joanna Korner.

    People who fled the Zamzam camp for the internally displaced after it fell under RSF control, walk in a makeshift encampment in an open field near the town of Tawila in war-torn Sudan’s western Darfur region on April 13, 2025.

    “The accused was not only giving orders … but was personally involved in the beatings and later was physically present and giving orders for the execution of those detained,” said Korner.

    Abd–Al-Rahman, who claimed he was wrongly identified, will be sentenced at a later date and faces a maximum sentence of life in prison. Born in 1949, Abd–Al-Rahman fled to the Central African Republic in February 2020 after Sudan’s new government announced it would cooperate with the ICC investigation. He later turned himself in, saying he was “desperate” and feared he would be killed by authorities.

    The conflict in Darfur lasted from 2003 to 2020, and is widely considered to be the 21st century’s first genocide. During that time the United Nations estimates that the conflict killed 300,000 people and forced 2.5 million from their homes.

    Read Also: President to oil workers: avoid strike that undermines economy

    Reading out the verdict, Korner recounted the horrific crimes committed by Abd–Al-Rahman, including gang rapes, abuse, and mass killings. Although the ICC has successfully prosecuted Abd–Al-Rahman, several arrest warrants remain outstanding against Sudanese officials, including one accusing former Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir of genocide, which he denies. Bashir, who was ousted in a 2019 coup, is reportedly in military custody in northern Sudan.

    During the trial, Karim Khan, the ICC chief prosecutor said Abd-Al-Rahman and the Janjaweed militia “rampaged” through Darfur and “inflicted severe pain and suffering on women, children and men in villages that he left in his wake.”

    The Janjaweed later evolved into the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which have been fighting the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) since 2023. The RSF is accused by the United States, the U.N. and others of committing another genocide in Darfur, displacing thousands, triggering famine and driving the region toward a new humanitarian catastrophe.

  • Former Congolese military leader: I am not ‘the Terminator’

    A former Congo military leader on trial for charges ranging from murder and rape to conscripting child soldiers and sexual slavery told judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Thursday that he was “a revolutionary, but not a criminal”.

    Bosco Ntaganda, who was dubbed “The Terminator’’ during his period with the Union of Congolese Patriots ( UPC ) militia, insisted that “the Terminator described by the prosecutor is not me” as he delivered a closing statement at the end of his three-year trial.

    Ntaganda faces 18 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity for acts allegedly committed in 2002-2003 when he was deputy Chief of Staff of the UPC, a militia group in the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

    Ntaganda surrendered at the U.S. Embassy in neighbouring Rwanda in 2013, seven years after his indictment, asking to be turned over to the ICC after apparently having fled Congo due to infighting among military groups.

    Read Also: Customs raises panel to investigate importation of military wears

    Prosecutors argued earlier that Ntaganda not only personally committed crimes ranging from murder to rape, sexual enslavement and the use of child soldiers but also ordered and oversaw his troops committing similar atrocities.

    They added that Ntaganda’s UPC, dominated by the Hema clan, allegedly targeted the rival Lendu for expulsion from Congo’s mineral-rich Ituri region.

    But his defence has insisted Ntaganda was a loyal and disciplined military commander whose involvement in events “caused fewer victims instead of more”.
    The UPC commander took measures to prevent crimes and punish perpetrators, defense lawyer Stephane Bourgon said.

    Bourgon urged the court to assess Ntaganda’s deeds “based on the evidence, not on the internet” and cast doubt on the reliability of several prosecution witnesses.

    Bourgon recalled the recent acquittal on appeal of another Congolese militia leader, Jean-Pierre Bemba.

    In that case judges ruled that while atrocities were committed by Bemba’s troops his level of control over his troops was uncertain and he had taken sufficient measures to try and stop them.

    No date has been set yet for a verdict in Ntaganda’s trial, with judges saying Thursday “it would certainly take some time” to go over all the case material.

  • Buhari seeks ICCs action on corruption cases, illicit financial flows

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday at The Hague called on the States Parties to support an International Criminal Court (ICC) with jurisdiction over serious cases of corruption and illicit financial flows by state actors.

    The President, in a statement by the Special Adviser on Media and publicity, Femi Adesina, also assured the international community of a free, fair and peaceful 2019 general elections in Nigeria, contrary to the tragic incidents that characterized the 2011 general elections, necessitating preliminary investigations by the ICC.

    Read Also:What Buhari has done on killings, by Presidency

    The Nigerian leader delivered the keynote address at the Solemn Hearing to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Rome Statute of the ICC.

    His words: ‘‘A strong and effective ICC has the potential to send a powerful message about the international community’s commitment to accountability, a message that will be heard by both victims and perpetrators. Equally, a strong and effective ICC demonstrates the international community’s commitment to the rule of law.

    ‘‘A strong and effective ICC can also act as a catalyst for other justice efforts, expanding the reach of accountability. These could include serious cases of corruption by state actors that severely compromise the development efforts of countries and throw citizens into greater poverty.

    ‘‘These could also include cases of illicit financial flows where countries are complicit and obstruct repatriation of stolen assets. As the African Union Champion on Anti-corruption, these are issues dear to my heart.’’

    Referring to the tragic events in Nigeria in the aftermath of the 2011 general elections, which necessitated preliminary investigation by the Court, the President said: ‘‘Nigeria is preparing to conduct general elections in 2019…I assure you that all hands are on deck to prevent any recurrence of such tragic incidents. We shall do everything possible to ensure that Nigeria witnesses the conduct of free, fair and peaceful elections in 2019.’’

    The President had commenced his address by thanking the judges of the Court for electing ‘‘a cherished son of Nigeria’’ as President.

    ‘‘Let me start by congratulating you, Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji, on your election as President of the International Criminal Court, and also thank the judges of the Court for electing you, a cherished son of Nigeria. Nigeria is very proud of you, Mr. President,’’ he said.

    The Nigerian leader is the only President invited to grace the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the ICC Rome Statute.

    Over 25 high-level state officials, the President of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute, O-Gon Kwon, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, ICC Registrar Peter Lewis, UN Legal Counsel Miguel de Serpa Soares, and other special guests, attended the event.

  • Burundi becomes first country to quit ICC

    Burundi becomes first country to quit ICC

    Burundi has become the first country to pull out of the International Criminal Court ( ICC ), a spokesman for the court in the Hague told dpa on Friday.

    The country had launched the process of leaving the court 2016, with the government saying the ICC was biased against African nations.

    Gambia and South Africa had announced their withdrawal in 2016, but changed their minds, leaving Burundi as the only country to officially leave.

    There are now 123 member states.

    Inspite of the withdrawal, the court will continue a preliminary investigation into possible war crimes in Burundi.

    The probe began in April 2016 and was “independent, impartial and objective,” the court spokesman added.

    Amnesty International’s Head of International Justice Matt Cannock said: “the Burundian government has made a cynical attempt to evade justice by taking the unprecedented step of withdrawing from the ICC.

    “Perpetrators, including members of the security forces, cannot so easily shirk their alleged responsibility for crimes under international law committed since 2015”.

    NAN

  • S/Africa defends decision to ignore ICC’s Bashir arrest warrant

    South Africa told the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Friday that it believed it was under no obligation to arrest Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir during a visit two years ago even though he was subject to an ICC arrest warrant.

    The ICC warrant did not outweigh a South African law that grants sitting heads of state immunity from prosecution, South African legal representative Dire Tladi told judges at a hearing to discuss Pretoria’s failure to arrest al-Bashir in 2015.

    “There is no duty under international law and the Rome Statute to arrest a serving head of state of a non-state-party such as Omar al-Bashir,” Tladi argued.

    The row between South Africa and the ICC over its failure to arrest al-Bashir, who is accused of genocide and war crimes, led to Pretoria’s notifying the United Nations last year that it would withdraw from the court.

    Earlier in January, a South African court blocked the move over procedural issues, but the government has said it will push ahead with the withdrawal.

    Al-Bashir denies the charges against him.

    Though Sudan is not a member of the ICC, the court has jurisdiction by virtue of a 2005 UN Security Council resolution referring the conflict to the Hague-based permanent war crimes court.

    Friday’s hearing was called so that the court can gather information on whether it should report South Africa either to the ICC’s governing body, the Assembly of State Parties, or to the UN Security Council for non-compliance with the court.

    NAN recalls that on Sept. 7, 2015, judges at the ICC asked South African authorities to explain why they failed to arrest al-Bashir in June when he attended a conference.

    Bashir, accused of masterminding genocide in Darfur, was able to leave an African Union summit in South Africa and fly home, in defiance of a ruling by a South African court ordering his detention under a warrant from the ICC.

    NAN recalls that South Africa, a member of the ICC, is obliged to enforce warrants from the Hague-based tribunal.

    NAN reports that the court said in cases where a member of the ICC fails to cooperate, the court may refer the matter to either the Assembly of States Parties, the ICC’s governing body, or the UN Security Council, which established the court and has the power to impose sanctions.

    President Jacob Zuma has defended the decision to let Bashir leave the country, saying they wanted leader had immunity as a guest of the African Union.

     

  • South Africa still intends to quit ICC – Minister

    South Africa’s government still plans to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC), Justice Minister Michael Masutha said on Wednesday, after a court ruled that it was unconstitutional to do so.

    Masutha described October’s notification to the UN of its intent to withdraw from the Rome Statute, the 1998 treaty establishing the Hague-based court, as a policy decision.

    He said the government would decide how to proceed, including a possible appeal, after reading the full judgment.

    NAN reports that the ICC, which launched in July 2002 and has 124 member states, is the first legal body with permanent international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

    South Africa notified the UN of its intent to withdraw from the Rome Statute, the 1998 treaty establishing the Hague-based court, last October.

    The withdrawal would take this October.

    High Court Judge Phineas Mojapelo in his ruling ordered the government to withdraw the notice to quit the ICC, according to a ruling broadcast on television.

    “We have won in our application to have SA’s withdrawal from the #ICC set aside,” the opposition Democratic Alliance party, which challenged the withdrawal, said on its Twitter feed.

    It was not immediately clear whether the government would appeal the court ruling.

    The ICC has had to fight off allegations of pursuing a neo-colonial agenda in Africa, where most of its investigations have been based.

    South Africa, Gambia and Burundi, in 2016, signaled their intention to quit the ICC.

    Gambia’s President Adama Barrow, elected in December, said earlier this month it will remain in the ICC.

    South Africa said it was quitting the ICC because membership conflicted with diplomatic immunity laws.

    Pretoria had in 2015 announced its intention to leave after the ICC criticized it for disregarding an order to arrest Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, accused of genocide and war crimes, when he visited South Africa.

    Bashir has denied the accusations.

  • Gambia, third African nation to withdraw from ICC

    Gambia has become the third African nation to submit its withdrawal from the International Criminal Court (ICC) to the United Nations.

    Information minister, Sheriff Baba Bojang, who announced the withdrawal on Wednesday on national television, said the acronym ICC stood for “International Caucasian Court.”

    “The court focused on “the persecution and humiliation of people of colour, especially Africans,” Bojang added.

    Gambia’s withdrawal came several days after South Africa announced it would leave the ICC, saying its membership hampered its efforts to resolve conflicts in Africa.

    Earlier this month, Burundi’s government also decided to quit the court in The Hague.

    ICC Assembly of States Parties President Sidiki Kaba, who is also the justice minister of Senegal, on Monday called the withdrawals a “watershed moment’’ for justice.

    The report says since the ICC entered into force in July 2002, only Africans have been on trial.

  • South Africa pulls out of  ICC

    South Africa pulls out of  ICC

    South Africa Friday served notice of its withdrawal from the  International Criminal Court  (ICC),the second African nation after Burundi to do so.

    Justice Minister Tshililo Michael Masutha said the notice had been submitted to the United Nations (UN) Secretary General.

    The pull out will become effective a year from now.

    Masutha told reporters that the ICC’s obligations are incompatible with laws giving sitting  leaders  diplomatic immunity.

    “The Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act, 2002, is  in conflict and inconsistent with the provisions of the Diplomatic Immunity and Privileges Act,2001,” he told reporters.

    He said a bill on the matter would soon go to the parliament.

    International Relations Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane said separately  that South Africa’s  laws are  incompatible with obligations under the ICC,pointing out  that government “found that its obligations with respect to the peaceful resolution of conflict at times are incompatible with the interpretation given by the International Criminal Court.”

    Created by the Rome Statute,the  Hague,Netherlands-based ICC comprises 124 states from around the world.

    It is the “court of last resort” and tries four types of crimes: genocide, crimes against humanity, crimes of aggression and war crimes.

    The country’s department of justice said via Twitter that South Africa was “hindered” by certain parts of the Rome Statute, primarily the one that “compels South Africa to arrest persons who may enjoy diplomatic immunity under customary international law, who are wanted by the ICC for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, to surrender such persons to the International Criminal Court.”

    It said the rule forced South Africa to turn over such persons even when the country was “actively involved in promoting peace, stability and dialogue in those countries.”

    During a 2015 visit to South Africa by Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, the ICC had requested his arrest on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide stemming from the conflict in the Darfur region in western Sudan.

    Al-Bashir departed the country without getting arrested.

    The ICC has come under criticism by African leaders for what they say unfairly targets them.

  • SERAP petitions ICC over unpaid salaries by 11 governors

    SERAP petitions ICC over unpaid salaries by 11 governors

    The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) have filed a petition at the International Criminal Court (ICC) against eleven state governments in the country over their failure to pay salaries to their workers.

    The organization in the petition requested the Prosecutor, ICC, Mrs. Fatou Bensouda, to use her position to investigate allegations of collective punishment and crimes against humanity against tens of thousands of Nigerian workers as a result of non-payment of their salaries for several months by their state governments.

    The affected states are Bayelsa, Benue, Bauchi, Osun, Rivers, Oyo, Ekiti, Kwara, Kogi, Ondo, and Plateau states.

    In the petition dated July 7, 2016 and signed by SERAP Executive Director, Mr Adetokunbo Mumuni, the organisation expressed concern that non-payment of workers’ salaries by several state governments in the country has made life impossible to live for the workers and families.

    SERAP therefore urged the ICC prosecutor, Mrs. Bensouda, “to bring to justice anyone who is responsible for the inhumane acts committed against Nigerian workers and prohibited under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court to which Nigeria is a state party.”

    The organization contended many Nigerians now face severe deprivation mental and physical health challenges as a result of the non-payment of their salaries.

    It said that many governors have continue to hide under the excuse of ‘limited allocations from Abuja’ to deny these workers the fruit of their labour while the workers’ individual liability have continued to rise.

    The petition stated in part: “Non-payment of salaries for several months have reduced Nigerian workers to ‘bare life’, or life not worth living, thus taking away their human dignity. The inhumanity of the non-payment of workers’ salaries is illustrated by the serious threats this poses to the workers’ physical and mental health, and family life as well as their ability to contribute to the development of the country. The non-payment of salaries has created an environment of powerlessness for several workers and perpetuated a system of impunity in many states.

    “The state governors ought to know that their actions and/or omissions would likely to cause serious physical or mental suffering or a serious attack upon the human dignity of workers whose salaries are not paid.

    “Article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court criminalises other inhumane acts intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health. The treatment of many workers in several states reaches the level of ‘inhumane acts’ covered under this provision.

    “Serious and systematic levels of inhuman and degrading treatment have expressly been recognised as qualifying as other ‘inhumane acts’. The same applies to the deprivation of adequate standard of living of thousands of workers such as adequate food, shelter, and medical care as a result of the non-payment of their salaries.

    “In the present case, the inhumane acts include non-payment of salaries of workers; failure of governors to use their executive authority to ensure a viable and corruption-free state, failure to provide the necessary administrative, financial and political conditions to facilitate prompt and timely payment of workers’ salaries.

    “To the extent that these acts expose tens of thousands of workers to inhumane acts while denying them the ability to challenge the legality of the action by the state governments, the acts can only be seen as a course of conduct involving the commission of inhumane acts.”, it stated

    The organisation argued that the non-payment of salaries of workers was a serious attack on human dignity covered in the definition of ‘other inhumane acts’ under the Rome Statute, and fit within the ICC’s mandate emphasizing that the gravity of non-payment of workers’ salaries for several months should not be dismissed a priori as lesser than that of the radically egregious acts the ICC has so far prosecuted.

    SERAP posited that to deprive workers of their salaries is to deprive them of their livelihoods and basic necessities to the right to life and human dignity, and to and cause them suffering of sufficient gravity and severity comparable to enumerated acts of crimes against humanity under article 7 of the Rome Statute.

    It argued that since no person can live without the means of living, the non-payment of workers’ salaries has affected individuals’ well-being and prevented them from enjoying basic necessities of life and caused great suffering to them and their family members.

    “International human rights law requires states to protect the rights of workers including to timely payment of salaries. The ICC can and should exercise its mandates under the Rome Statute to enforce these internationally recognized human rights by holding individual governors accountable for the crimes against humanity committed against many Nigerian workers,” it said.

    “Nigerian workers have for many years been victims of particularly heinous violations of international human rights law caused by massive looting of public treasury and mismanagement by high-ranking public officials.”

    “SERAP is seriously concerned that several state governments in Nigeria are failing and/or refusing to pay workers’ salaries, amounting to billions of naira in arrears.

    “SERAP also contends that the gross violations of human rights and deplorable standard of living of many workers and their families in several states of Nigeria are grave and therefore suggest reasonable grounds justifying a preliminary investigation by the ICC Prosecutor.”

    “Aside from investigating violation of human rights, it further urged the prosecutor to investigate those crimes such as gross, systematic and widespread violations of workers’ right to timely payment of salaries that fall under the Rome Statute provision on “other inhumane acts” but remain unacknowledged as grave violations of human rights.”

    “Investigating violations of workers’ right to timely payment of salaries will allow the ICC to realise a broad notion of complementarity, as it will enable the Prosecutor to provide justice to the workers that many of the states in Nigeria are unwilling or unable to protect,”it added.

     

  • FG promises to address causes of insurgency, militancy

    FG promises to address causes of insurgency, militancy

    Federal government Tuesday said it was working unearth the root causes of insurgency and agitation in parts of the country with a view to addressing them.

    The Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) gave this assurance Tuesday  while addressing aggrieved lawyers, who were in his office to protest what they termed the menace of Boko Haram.

    Malami said the Fed Government was considering constituting a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate how insurgency found its way into the country.

    About 100 lawyers under the umbrella body of Lawyers United for Equality and Human Rights Advocacy (LUEHRA) protested to the office of the AGF to demand the investigation and prosecution of person found to have been sponsoring insurgency in the country.

    Malami was represented by the Director in charge of General Services in the Ministry, Mrs. Lola Uket. She assured the protesting lawyers that the minister will act on their demands.

    “You have made your demands and I am sure the minister will act and act very fast to meet your demands. All will be addressed. I believe you gave a time frame in your demand and I am sure they will all be met.

    “Your demands have not been met before now not because of negligence on the part of the minister but because of certain circumstances.

    “Let us be patient with them because they are also learned men like you. Let us give them the benefit of the doubt that something will be done,”she said‎.

    The lawyers in their position paper asked the minister to ensure the investigation and prosecution of sponsors of the Islamic Terrorist group, Boko Haram and ensure their prosecution at the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    In the paper, addressed to the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, a senior advocate, the lawyers asked the FG to avoid the grave mistake of government in the past that led to the intermittent resurrection of Niger Delta militancy.

    The group’s leader, Samson Esekhaigbe and Publicity Secretary, Nnena Okereke said recent frightening developments in the country were capable of causing serious political upheavals.

    Esekhaigbe said the developments were pointers to the fact that the top politicians in Borno State who created Boko Haram are still in touch with their “foot soldiers”.

    “We are afraid that the senseless killings by this animalistic bunch will not stop unless their sponsors are identified, tried in our local courts or dragged to the International Criminal Court at The Hague and accordingly imprisoned for facilitating heinous crimes against humanity. This is the only way that enduring peace would return to the North and Nigeria in general.

    “A situation whereby no less than 10,000 persons have been killed in various brutal activities spearheaded by the group is alarming”.

    The lawyers said it is their duty as a group of refined legal minds to fight and preserve Nigeria- the country that gave every Nigerian a home and heritage.

    The group condoled with those who lost their loved ones to insurgencies and insisted that the time to end Boko Haram is now otherwise the innocent blood spilt over the years will hunt us.

    The group is an umbrella body of pro-democracy, concerned and patriotic Nigerian lawyers committed to true democratic principles bringing to cognizance equity, fairness and respect for human rights and the rule of law in line with the change mantra of the present administration.