Tag: IOSCO

  • IOSCO backs international ethics for sustainability assurance

    IOSCO backs international ethics for sustainability assurance

    The board of International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has reiterated support for the development of global standards and codes on sustainability assurance and reporting.

    IOSCO commended the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) on achieving an important milestone of finalising its International Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance (IESSA), including International Independence Standards and other revisions to the code relating to sustainability assurance and reporting.

    Read Also: Experts project healthy naira, low inflation early 2025

    Chair of IOSCO, Jean-Paul Servais said history has shown that assurance is necessary to deliver trust in disclosures, which is instrumental for the good functioning of financial markets.

    Servais described the IESBA’s IESSA as a welcome development that provides a robust ethical framework for the assurance of sustainability reporting.

    He said a strong assurance framework for sustainability related disclosures needs to be focused on the public interest and should be profession – and framework – agnostic.

    “IESBA’s new international standard will foster trust and integrity for years to come. IOSCO will continue to play a key role in promoting global consistency in the

  • IOSCO seeks to protect aged investors from fraud, other risks

    THE International Oragnisa- tion of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), the global securities regulator, has launched a new report that seeks to protect ageing investors from financial fraud, unsuitable investment and other risks as part of efforts to safeguard senior investors from losing their hard-earned nest eggs.

    Its board on Monday published the report that examined the growing vulnerability of ageing investors to financial fraud and other risks and identified sound practices for enhancing their protection.

    The report- Senior Investor Vulnerability- revealed that seniors are at a higher risk than other investors of losing money to fraud or of being misled by others.  It also indicated that the biggest risks to senior investors are unsuitable investments, financial fraud and their diminished cognitive capability which affects their financial decision-making. Complex products, deficient financial literacy, and social isolation pose additional risks to senior investors.

    IOSCO noted that ageing populations are a challenge to investor protection, as ageing and associated levels of physical and cognitive decline increasingly debilitate the capabilities of investors worldwide. Research indicated that age-induced cognitive decline is linked to impaired financial decision-making. Some research also correlated ageing with increased susceptibility to financial exploitation and fraud. These vulnerabilities are growing just as many investors assume greater responsibility for their retirement and financial future.

    The IOSCO report explored the views and experiences of IOSCO members regarding senior investor vulnerability while providing a list and description of sound practices for both regulators and financial services providers. The report also included a non-exhaustive bibliography of literature that may be helpful to regulators and others.

    According to the report, the sound practices to be promoted by securities market regulators are     delivering of educational programmes and resources targeting senior investors, fostering the development of senior-focused expertise within existing regulatory, educational or advisory programmes, conducting research projects to better understand the risks and issues facing senior investors and the incidence and mechanics of investment fraud that affect seniors in their jurisdictions and development of guidelines and training programmes for personnel reviewing transactions conducted with senior investors.

    The sound practices to be promoted by financial services providers include offering support to senior investors experiencing a life event during the product lifecycle and providing training and support for employees of financial services firms.

    IOSCO is global body of securities regulators and its members regulate more than 95 per cent of the world’s securities markets in more than 115 jurisdictions. Nigeria is a member of both the board of IOSCO and its influential Committee on Retail Investors, otherwise known as Committee 8.

     

  • Nigeria absent at IOSCO’s World Investor Week

    Nigeria was not listed as a participant as the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) on Monday launched its first World Investor Week (WIW).

    IOSCO is global body of securities regulators and its members regulate more than 95 per cent of the world’s securities markets in more than 115 jurisdictions.

    Nigeria is a member of both the board of IOSCO and its influential Committee on Retail Investors, otherwise known as Committee 8. However, Nigeria was not listed as one of the participating countries in the epochal week-long event, which was kicked off by IOSCO  with a bell-ringing ceremony at the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

    During the world investor week, countries and organisations will engage in activities to promote greater investor education and protection worldwide. The world investor week is expected to run till October 8.

    There are 81 participating countries in the maiden event, including Cameroon, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa and Zambia.

    Throughout the week, securities regulators and other stakeholders from the participating countries across the globe will be providing  various activities to increase the awareness of investor education and protection in their own jurisdictions.

    Activities vary from publications of investor-focused communications, to the organisation of workshops and conferences, to local and national investor education campaigns and contests. A dedicated campaign website provides details on the various participating authorities and important international organisations supporting this effort.

    Chair of the IOSCO Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, Ashley Alder, said the wide variety of global activity in response to IOSCO´s first WIW was encouraging and showed the importance of investor education and protection and the need to bring this in the spotlight.

    “Many of the activities that are taking place are centred around the campaign’s key messages that relate to the desired behaviour, skillset and attitude of a smart investor. Continuing to raise awareness is critical not only to investors, but to market participants and regulators as well,” IOSCO Secretary General, Paul Andrews, said.

    Nigerian securities regulators could not provide immediate comments on the absence of the country in the global list of participants. Nearly all other members of the IOSCO Board are participating in the maiden investor week.

    The members of the IOSCO Board are the securities regulatory authorities of Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, Ontario, Pakistan, Peru, Quebec, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

    Nigeria is a member of the Committee on Retail Investors, which was set up by the IOSCO Board in June 2013. The committee’s primary mandate is to conduct IOSCO’s policy work on retail investor education and financial literacy. Its secondary mandate is to advise the IOSCO Board on emerging retail investor protection matters and conduct investor protection policy work as directed by the IOSCO Board.

    The members of Committee 8 are the securities regulatory authorities of Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Ontario, Portugal, Quebec, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

     

  • IOSCO moves to enhance cross-border regulation

    The International Organisation of Securities Commissions has outlined steps aimed at supporting cross-border regulation and embedding the consideration of cross-border issues more effectively into IOSCO´s work. These were part of the highlights of the final report of IOSCO Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation (Task Force).

    The International experience of regulators in developing and implementing cross-border regulations in globalised securities markets had highlighted the challenges they faced in ensuring the effectiveness of domestic regulation, without unduly constraining the cross-border offering of financial services or products.  In June 2013, IOSCO established the Task Force to assist policy-makers and regulators in addressing these challenges and to consider in detail cross-border regulatory issues.

    The final report indicates that cross-border regulation is moving towards more engagement via different forms of recognition to solve regulatory overlaps, gaps, and inconsistencies. While the increased engagement is mostly bilateral at this stage, multilateral engagement is likely to develop further as markets continue to grow and emerge around the world and with the greater use of supervisory Memoranda of Understandings.

    The report presents a series of concrete next steps aimed at supporting cross-border regulation and embedding the consideration of cross-border issues more effectively into IOSCO´s work.  Among these, IOSCO Policy Committees will start to identify and consider specific cross-border implications of their policy-making. For example, there is a need for consideration of how regulatory timing will work among jurisdictions and whether there should be more multilateral cooperation prior to the domestic policy-making stage.

    Task Force members also agree that IOSCO should engage more with the G20 and the Financial Stability Board in order to raise greater awareness of the key issues and challenges faced by IOSCO members on cross-border regulation, including the need for more refined thinking on concepts of “deference”.

    The report provides a detailed resource for regulators.  It includes a toolkit of three broad types of cross-border regulatory options, supporting case studies, a description of the processes used to assess comparability of foreign regulatory regimes, and considerations on the application of the toolkit.  These better equip regulators and policy-makers to develop, implement, and evaluate cross-border regulatory approaches.

    The report’s analysis and findings are based on a survey across the IOSCO membership regarding their regulatory approaches to cross-border financial activities involving, among others, market intermediaries, securities exchanges and markets, collective investment schemes, and financial market infrastructures.  Emphasis was placed on the underlying rationale, experiences, and challenges of developing and implementing these approaches.

    The Task Force also conducted three roundtable meetings in Hong Kong, London, and Washington D.C., as well as a public consultation, to gather views from the industry and other stakeholders.

    Extensive input were received regarding the challenges in complying with cross-border regulations, and how IOSCO can facilitate the development and implementation of cross-border regulatory tools, and enhance coordination among member regulators.

    “Promoting consistent regulatory approaches for cross-border market activities is challenging, not least because it must take into account existing differences in markets, regulatory philosophies and other domestic considerations,” said Mr. Ashley Alder, Chief Executive Officer of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission and Chair of the Task Force.

  • Financial regulators seek better understanding of rating products and services

    The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has launched a project specification for its Committee 6 on Credit Rating Agencies (C6) to gain a better understanding of the credit rating industry and in particular of certain other products or services

    To begin work on this project, C6 is undertaking a series of successive information gathering exercises.    The information collected through this exercise will serve as a base for discussions between C6 members, issuers of Other CRA Products and other interested parties.

    The second stage will focus on gathering information on how issuers and investors and, more generally, users of the Other CRA Products and services utilise and understand them.

    Other CRA Products are distinguishable from the traditional credit ratings that CRAs publicly disclose or disseminate to subscribers.  They may include, for example, private ratings, confidential ratings, expected ratings, indicative ratings, prospective ratings, provisional ratings, preliminary ratings, one-time ratings, regional ratings, national ratings, point-in-time rating, scoring, credit assessments, rating assessments, assessments, or research.

    Market participants may use other CRA products to help assess the creditworthiness of an entity or obligation.  Or they may be used for different purposes.  For example, they may be used to understand the impact that a hypothetical or proposed transaction would have on a traditional credit rating or to understand how a CRA would ultimately rate a new issuance.

     

  • IOSCO publishes regulatory framework for ETFs

    The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has published its final report on Principles for the Regulation of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) as part of efforts to tighten regulations for the fast-growing segment of the capital market.

    The new regulatory framework contains nine principles intended to guide the regulation of ETFs and foster industry best practices. There is only one ETF- the NewGold Exchange Traded Fund on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.

    IOSCO underscored the importance of effective regulation for ETFs pointing out that investors’ interest in ETFs has increased worldwide as evidenced by the sharp increase in funds invested in these types of products.

    According to IOSCO, assets managed under ETF structures totaled almost $1.9 trillion at the end of January 2013, representing some seven per cent of the global mutual fund market.

    “This dynamic growth in ETFs has gradually attracted the attention of regulators, concerned about the potential impact of ETFs on investors and on the broader marketplace, as the industry has continued to evolve through diversification and the launch of new innovative products,” IOSCO noted.

    The global body of securities regulators noted that the final report on ETF was a result of numerous consultations among IOSCO’s member regulators and their repeated engagements with representatives of the global ETF industry.

    “As such, it reflects a shared consensus within the regulatory community as to how the regulation of ETFs should be approached. Taking into account the comments expressed during the consultation process, IOSCO has focused its final recommendations on features that are specific to ETFs. The principles address ETFs that are organised as Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) and do not apply to other, non-CIS, Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs),” IOSCO stated.

    It outlined that the report was structured into two main sections with the first section detailing ETF classification and relevant disclosures for investors, including principles intended to clearly differentiate ETFs from other non-CIS ETPs, as well as from other CIS.

    According to IOSCO, it is important that investors are able to appreciate both the similarities and differences of ETFs with other competing products, as well as the way ETFs achieve their investment objective and the quality of their performance typically vis-à-vis a reference index.

     

  • IOSCO consults on cross-border regulation

    The International Organization of Securities Commissions has published the consultation report of the IOSCO Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation, which identifies and describes cross-border regulatory tools and challenges.

    IOSCO is the leading international policy forum for securities regulators and is recognized as the global standard setter for securities regulation.  The organization’s membership regulates more than 95 per cent of the world’s securities markets in more than 115 jurisdictions including Nigeria.

    The consultation report describes three cross-border regulatory tools that have been used, or are under consideration, by IOSCO members to help address the challenges they face in protecting investors, maintaining market quality and reducing systemic risk.

    According to the report, these tools provide the basis for developing a cross-border regulatory toolkit and common terminology describing potential options for IOSCO members to consult when considering cross-border regulations. They can be broadly classified into three main types: national treatment, recognition, and passporting.

    The report also includes a detailed discussion of the key challenges and experiences faced by regulators in implementing cross-border securities regulations, including how their national rules will apply to global financial markets and interact with foreign rules and international standards.

    In June 2013, IOSCO established the Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation (Task Force) to consider these cross-border regulatory issues and to assist policy makers and regulators in addressing the cross-border challenges they face.

    To prepare the consultation report, the Task Force conducted a survey among IOSCO members from late October 2013 to April 2014.

  • IOSCO reviews price formation process for commodity derivatives

    The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has launched a research into the potential effects of storage infrastructure on the integrity of the price formation process of commodity derivatives in member jurisdictions.

    IOSCO is asking its members to respond to the questionnaire and to encourage other relevant entities in their jurisdictions-storage and market infrastructure providers, market participants and end users, to do so as well. There are no restrictions on who can answer the questionnaire.

    IOSCO believes that the questionnaire is a fundamental part of its work in this area, as it will inform its thinking going forward.

    IOSCO had recently also set up a work agenda to strengthen and foster the roles of capital markets as trusted sources of capital with a view to encouraging greater use of capital markets as financing channels for transactions.

    The board of IOSCO, which met recently in Madrid, discussed progress on a number of key initiatives to support the G20-FSB efforts to restore stability in the global financial system and build economic growth.

    The board, which included Nigeria’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), also looked into methodologies for identifying non-bank global systemically important financial institutions or activities in the areas of asset management and market intermediaries.

    IOSCO also discussed the role capital markets and securities regulators can play in supporting long-term finance, including infrastructure investment and small and medium enterprises (SME )financing.

    The meeting also considered the implementation of IOSCO Principles on Financial Benchmarks, the IOSCO Principles for Oil Price Reporting Agencies and the IOSCO Principles for the Regulation and Supervision of Commodity Derivatives Markets.

    Chairman, International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), Greg Medcraft said capital markets are emerging as a key source of the finance needed across the globe to drive economic growth.

    “Through a work agenda focused on fostering markets as a trusted source of capital, IOSCO is playing an important role in supporting that growth,” Medcraft noted.

    The IOSCO board also discussed audit quality and important initiatives to build confidence in global securities markets and to reduce the reliance of asset managers and market intermediaries on credit ratings as well as promote effective credible deterrence as a key element in improving investor protection and confidence in markets.

    Members discussed the results of the IOSCO research department´s latest market survey on market trends, which emphasizes the growing leverage in securities markets, the impact of cross-border capital flows on emerging markets, financial risk disclosure, collateral management, and potential counterparty risk in central clearing houses.

    Board members also examined policy measures aimed at building capacity in emerging markets and supporting the creation of strong regulatory frameworks for sustaining growth in both emerging and developed markets.

     

     

  • Commission releases forex rate benchmark

    Commission releases forex rate benchmark

    THE foreign exchange benchmark for global players has been released by the FSB, The Nation can authoritatively report. The report was prepared by FSB in collaboration with International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in line with discussions of FX market participants across the globe, along with submissions received in response to an interim report published in July 2014 for wider public consultation.

    The work of the FSB in this area was initiated in response to concerns raised in 2013 about the integrity of FX benchmarks. These concerns stemmed particularly from the incentives for potential market malpractice linked to the structure of trading around the benchmark fixings.

    As a result, the FSB Plenary formed a working group to focus on FX benchmarks. The mandate of the group was to undertake analysis of the FX market structure and incentives that may promote particular types of trading activity around the benchmark fixings. The group was tasked to propose possible remedies to address these adverse incentives as well as to examine whether there is a need and scope to improve the construction of the benchmarks themselves.

    Based on discussions with the relevant market sectors, the FSB believes that all the recommendations above can and will be accepted and implemented by the market groups concerned, thus the report is expected to deliver a substantial improvement in market structure and conduct.

    The FX benchmark group was co-chaired by Guy Debelle (Assistant Governor, Financial Markets, Reserve Bank of Australia) and Paul Fisher (Deputy Head of the Prudential Regulation Authority: Bank of England.

    The FSB has been established to coordinate at the international level the work of national financial authorities and international standard setting bodies and to develop and promote the implementation of effective regulatory, supervisory and other financial sector policies in the interest of financial stability.

    The FSB brings together national authorities responsible for financial stability in 24 countries and jurisdictions, international financial institutions, sector-specific international groupings of regulators and supervisors, and committees of central bank experts.  The FSB also conducts outreach with 65 other jurisdictions through its six regional consultative groups.

    The FSB is chaired by Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England. Its Secretariat is located in Basel, Switzerland, and hosted by the Bank for International Settlements.

    The report was prepared by a Review Team constituted by IOSCO’s Task Force on Financial Benchmarks and Assessment Committee members, in response to a request from the FSB for IOSCO to undertake a formal review of the closing spot rate against the Benchmark Principles.  The FSB report published today sets out a number of recommendations for reform in the FX markets, and in particular the benchmark rates.

  • IOSCO reviews reliance on credit rating agencies

    The International Organization of Securities Commissions is reviewing the extent to which asset managers, investors and other parties should rely on credit rating agencies (CRAs) in their asset management.

    The global body of securities regulators has published a consultation report on Good Practices on Reducing Reliance on Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) in asset management with the aim of gathering the views and practices of investment managers, institutional investors and other interested parties on the subject.

    It will subsequently develop a set of good practices on reducing over reliance on external credit rating in the asset management space.

    IOSCO noted that CRAs play a prominent role in today’s global financial markets pointing out that while approaches may differ across jurisdictions, investment managers often use the services of CRAs to form an opinion on the creditworthiness of a particular issuer before purchasing securities, selecting counterparties, or choosing the best collateral to secure transactions.

    It added that investors often refer to CRA ratings before buying shares of a fund, or when guiding investment managers on the basis of a tailored investment mandate.

    IOSCO pointed out that the role of CRAs has come under regulatory scrutiny, mainly as a result of the over-reliance of market participants, including investment managers and institutional investors, on CRA ratings in their assessments of both financial instruments and issuers in the run-up to the 2007-2008 financial crisis.

    According to IOSCO, the good practices that result the consultation paper will be addressed to national regulators, investment managers, and investors, where applicable while IOSCO has also launched a separate project to identify the good practices of intermediaries with regard to the use of alternatives to credit ratings to assess creditworthiness.

    The report stresses the importance for asset managers to have the appropriate expertise and processes in place to assess and manage the credit risk associated with their investment decisions. Recognizing the utility of external ratings, the report mentions that they can be used as an input among others to complement a manager’s internal credit analysis and provide an independent opinion as to the quality of the portfolio constituents. However, in order to avoid the over-reliance on external ratings, the report lists some possible good practices that managers may consider when resorting to external ratings.

    Some of the good practices undergoing consultation include that investment managers make their own determinations as to the credit quality of a financial instrument before investing and throughout the holding period. While external credit ratings may form one element, among others, of the internal assessment process but it should not constitute the sole factor supporting the credit analysis.

    Also, there should be an internal assessment process that is commensurate with the type and proportion of debt instruments the investment manager may invest in, and a brief summary description of which is made available to investors, as appropriate.

    Regulators are also expected to encourage investment managers to review their disclosures describing alternative sources of credit information in addition to external credit ratings while also encouraging investment managers to disclose the use of external credit ratings and describe in an understandable way how these complement or are used with the manager’s own internal credit assessment methods

    Also, were external credit ratings are used, investment managers should understand the methodologies, parameters and the basis on which the opinion of a CRA was produced, and have adequate means and expertise to identify the limitations of the methodology and assumptions used to form that opinion.

    Regulators will also encourage investment managers not to rely solely on external credit ratings and to consider alternative quality parameters such as liquidity and maturity when assessing the credit quality of their counterparties or collateral.