Tag: Iran

  • U.S. vows to strike again if Iran rebuilds nuclear programme

    U.S. vows to strike again if Iran rebuilds nuclear programme

    The United States (U.S.) would strike Iran again if the country attempts to rebuild its nuclear programme, President Donald Trump said yesterday.

    Trump made the statement during an exchange with reporters while attending a NATO summit in the Netherlands yesterday. The U.S. has touted a report from Israel stating that the strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities set back the country’s programme “many years.”

    A reporter asked Trump whether he would strike Iran again if it were to rebuild its nuclear facilities.

    “Sure,” came Trump’s blunt response.

    The exchange came after NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte praised Trump as a “man of strength” and a “man of peace” during yesterday’s summit.

    Read Also: Tinubu approves hosting of Africa chiefs of Defence Staff summit in Abuja

    “I just want to recognise your decisive action on Iran,” Rutte said at the start of his joint remarks with the president. “You are a man of strength, but you are also a man of peace. And the fact that you are now also successful in getting this ceasefire done between Israel and Iran — I really want to commend you for that. I think this is important for the whole world.”

    Rutte also praised Trump’s effort to get NATO members to pay more and said the president was “flying into another big success” after all countries—except Spain—agreed to spend 5% of their GDP on defense. He added that Trump achieved something “NO American president in decades could get done.”

    Leaders of NATO member states had mixed reactions to the strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities, with several calling for de-escalation while acknowledging the threat a nuclear Iran would pose to global security.

    Trump cajoled Iran and Israel into a ceasefire on Tuesday that has so far held after an uncertain start that saw Trump unleash his frustration with both countries.

  • Netanyahu warns Iran against restoring its nuclear programme

    Netanyahu warns Iran against restoring its nuclear programme

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has issued a renewed threat to Iran following the implementation of the ceasefire.

    Netanyahu said Israel had achieved “a historic victory” and destroyed Iran’s nuclear programme.

    He said if Iran moved to restore its nuclear programme, Israel would repeat its recent actions against the Islamic Republic.

    “Should Iran attempt to restore it, Israel “will act with the same determination and the same force to cut off any such attempt.”

    The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation had already announced that the country intended to continue the production process at its nuclear facilities without interruption.

    Experts say the extent of the destruction caused by the attacks from Israel and the United States on Iran’s nuclear facilities remains unclear.

    U.S. media, citing a classified Pentagon assessment, reported that the U.S. strikes would only set back Iran’s nuclear programme by months.

    Tehran continues to insist that it does not intend to build nuclear weapons and is pursuing only a civilian programme.

    Read Also: Netanyahu banks on America’s help to ‘finish the job on Iran’

    However, before the war, the country possessed uranium with a purity level close to weapons-grade, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

    The Israeli army also destroyed Iran’s missile industry, Netanyahu said.

    Shortly before the ceasefire began, Israel’s military had delivered “the hardest blow of all since the start of the war” to Tehran’s government, killing hundreds of government officials.

    There has been no Iranian confirmation of this.

    The Israeli prime minister also thanked U.S. President Donald Trump for the U.S. attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

    “I must tell you Israel has never had as great a friend in the White House,” he said.

    (dpa/NAN)

  • Iran, Israel differ on resolving conflict with diplomacy at UN

    Iran, Israel differ on resolving conflict with diplomacy at UN

    Iran and Israel on Tuesday at the UN Security Council, sharply disagreed over employing diplomacy to resolve Iran’s nuclear programme that led to a 13-day violent conflict between them.

    Iran had said diplomacy could and must resolve differences between it and Israel on the one hand, and the world on the other hand, over its nuclear programme.

    However, Israel differed, warning that diplomacy with Iran had failed.

    Iran’s Ambassador to the UN, Amir Iravani, told the Security Council that his country “never initiated this war”.

    Saeid said “once the aggressors stopped their attacks, Iran stopped its lawful military response as well”.

    Saeid also expressed his country’s strong commitment to diplomacy as the path through which differences can and should be resolved.

    “Iran continues to believe that a diplomatic resolution to nuclear and sanction issues is possible,” Saeid said.

    He called on the Security Council to condemn Israel’s and the United States’ attacks on Iran and their International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)-protected nuclear facilities and work to ensure that they never happen again.

    Saeid added that Iran upheld Council Resolution 2231 and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), and that remedial measures were “fully consistent” with these two instruments.

    Howevet, Israel warned that diplomacy with Iran over its nuclear programme had failed.

    Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon defended his country’s military operation against Iran, describing it as a necessary move to neutralise a “double existential threat” from Tehran’s nuclear and missile programmes.

    Read Also: Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire, Iran cautious

    He said Israel achieved complete air superiority and removed key regime targets, acting in coordination with the U.S.

    Danon accused Iran of deceiving the world for years, using diplomacy as cover to advance its nuclear weapons programme.

    “There is still time to take meaningful and decisive action to ensure that the threat of a nuclear Iran does not return stronger than before,” he said.

    “We are often told that diplomacy must be given a chance, it was given every chance, every round, every channel, every deadline.

    “But so far it has failed, the regime in Tehran never had any intention of complying,” he added.

    The United States, in its position, urged Iran to return to the negotiation table and renounce its nuclear programme.

    Acting U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN, Amb. Dorothea Shea, said Iran’s increase in nuclear activity lacked “any credible civilian justification.”

    The UK Ambassador Barbara Woodward welcomed the ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump but warned that “the situation remains extremely fragile.”

    Expressing that “now is the time for a return to diplomacy,” Woodward urged Iran to engage in talks without delay, warning that its nuclear programme had exceeded “any credible civilian justification.”

    She said all diplomatic levers would be deployed for a negotiated outcome and to “ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon.”

    Echoing UN appeals for dialogue, the European Union stressed that “a lasting solution to the Iranian nuclear issue can only be through a negotiated deal, not military action.”

    Briefing the Council, Amb. Stavros Lambrinidis said, ”Ensuring that Iran does not acquire or develop a nuclear weapon remains a key security priority for the EU”.

    A fragile ceasefire brokered by the United States between Iran and Israel appears to be holding, marking a tentative halt to a dangerous regional escalation.

    UN political affairs chief Rosemary DiCarlo said the fragile ceasefire announced by U.S. President Donald Trump provided “an opportunity to avoid a catastrophic escalation and achieve a peaceful resolution of the Iran nuclear issue.”

    Amid the relative calm, the UN renewed its call for a diplomatic solution to the Iran nuclear issue, warning that the objectives of the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) and the resolution that endorsed it remained unmet.

    JCPOA is an agreement negotiated between Iran and the Permanent Members of the UN Security Council, with the EU.

    It aims to limit Iran’s nuclear programme to exclusively peaceful purpose in return for sanctions relief and other provisions.

    (NAN)

  • Qatar summons Iranian ambassador over missile attack

    Qatar summons Iranian ambassador over missile attack

    The Qatari Foreign Ministry on Tuesday said it has summoned the Iranian ambassador in Doha to reiterate its condemnation of Iran’s targeting of a military base in the Gulf country.

    On Monday evening, Iran carried out a retaliatory missile attack on the U.S. military’s al-Udeid base in Qatar, which came days after the U.S. struck three key nuclear sites in Iran in support of Israel.

    Qatar told the ambassador that this violation is inconsistent with the principle of good neighbourliness and the close relations between Qatar and Iran, as Qatar has always been an advocate of dialogue with Iran and has made strenuous diplomatic efforts in this regard, according to a statement from the Foreign Ministry.

    Earlier, Doha said it sent a letter to the United Nations Security Council, informing the members and UN chief António Guterres of the extremely dangerous escalation, which poses a direct threat to regional peace and security.

    Read Also: Iran launches attack on U.S. Air Bases in Qatar, Iraq

    Qatar also urged the Security Council to fulfill its responsibilities and take urgent measures to impose an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire throughout the Middle East to prevent the region from sliding into further dangerous escalation.

    The al-Udeid base, which normally hosts around 10,000 soldiers and civilian personnel according to reports, had been previously evacuated.

    Qatar re-opened its airspace after closing it shortly before the attacks.

    Bahrain and Kuwait also closed their airspace as a precautionary measure, but reopened it a short time later.

    All three countries host U.S military facilities.

    (dpa/NAN)

  • Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire, Iran cautious

    Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire, Iran cautious

    U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire after cloae to two weeks of violent conflict between the two countries.

    Trump took to his Truth Social on Monday evening to announce that both countries had agreed to a “complete and total ceasefire”.

    According to him, the ceasefire agreement is expected to take effect at 12 midnight local time but both Iran and Israel are yet to confirm any definite ceasefire agreement.

    However, Iran said its military operations “to punish Israel for its aggression continued until the very last minute, at 4am.”

    Trump wrote: “Congratulations to everyone! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a complete and total ceasefire”.

    Trump said the ceasefire will begin “in approximately six hours from now” after each country has “wound down” their military operations and “the war will be considered ended”.

    Trump announced that “officially, Iran will start the ceasefire and, upon the 12th hour, Israel will start the ceasefire”.

    He added that “by the 24th hour, an official end to the 12 day war will be saluted by the world”.

    The U.S. leader congratulated both countries for the courage to end the disastrous conflict.

    “During each ceasefire, the other side will remain peaceful and respectful,” Trump wrote.

    “On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both countries.

    “Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, “the 12 day war”.”

    He stressed that the war could have destroyed the Middle East if allowed to persist.

    “This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn’t, and never will!

    “God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and God bless the world!” Trump concluded.

    Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyed Araghchi, in his response, said, “As of now, there is NO “agreement” on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations.

    “However, provided that the Israeli regime stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no later than 4 am Tehran time, we have no intention to continue our response afterwards.”

    (NAN)

  • Iran’s diplomat to hand Putin letter from supreme leader  

    Iran’s diplomat to hand Putin letter from supreme leader  

    Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, is supposed to hand Russian President Vladimir Putin a letter from Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei with a request for more support amid U.S.

    Israeli stroke on the country, Reuters reported on Monday, citing a senior source.

    Read Also: U.S. bombing of Iran started with a fake-out

    Araghchi arrived in Moscow on Sunday to hold talks with the Russian leadership.

    Iranian sources told the news agency that Tehran “has not been impressed’’ with the level of support from Moscow and wanted Russia to take stronger measures in backing Iran against Israel and the U.S.

    However, the sources did not specify what additional assistance Tehran was seeking, Reuters said. (RIA/NAN)

  • U.S. strikes on Iran increase risk of wider war – UN chief 

    U.S. strikes on Iran increase risk of wider war – UN chief 

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres told the Security Council on Sunday that massive overnight strikes by the U.S. on Iran’s nuclear facilities would only increase the risk of a wider war.

    Guterres, at an emergency meeting convened by the Council on threats to international peace and security, said the strikes had also done “serious damage to the international order.”

    It has been 10 days of airstrikes initiated by Israel aimed at crippling Iran’s nuclear programme which have led to deadly daily exchanges of missile fire between Tehran and Tel Aviv,

    The UN chief, however, said that diplomacy must now prevail, stressing, “We now risk descending into a rathole of retaliation after retaliation.”

    The U.S. intervention overnight in support of Israel’s military campaign, targeted three Iranian facilities involved in uranium enrichment.

    “We must act, immediately and decisively, to halt the fighting and return to serious, sustained negotiations on the Iran nuclear programme,” Guterres added.

    He told ambassadors the citizens of the wider Middle East region could not endure yet another cycle of destruction.

    Demanding a ceasefire, he also put Iran on notice that it must “fully respect” the Non-Proliferation Treaty on the development of nuclear weapons as a cornerstone of peace and security worldwide.

    Read Also: U.S. bombing of Iran started with a fake-out

    Iran had consistently denied the allegation from Israel and others that its ambitions were to become a nuclear-armed state, versus developing atomic energy for purely peaceful purposes.

    The UN scribe stressed that Israel, the U.S. and Iran faced a stark choice, insisting that diplomacy must prevail.

    “One path leads to a wider war, deeper human suffering and serious damage to the international order.

    “The other leads to de-escalation, diplomacy and dialogue,” he said.

    UN Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs Miroslav Jenča told ambassadors that the world was facing “a dangerous moment” following the U.S. bombing mission and Iran considered potential retaliation.

    Jenča warned the council that the region risks being “engulfed in further instability and volatility”, with “no military solution to this conflict.”

    The top UN official worried that hostilities between Iran and Israel were now into their tenth day and the humanitarian toll was mounting.

    “Most of the 430 killed in Iran have been civilians,” he noted, while also citing Israeli reports of 25 dead and over 1,300 injured.

    He also flagged growing threats from non-state armed groups, including the Houthis in Yemen.

    Their retaliation, he said, could widen the conflict.

    Iran’s parliament meanwhile voiced support for closing the crucial trading route through the narrow Strait of Hormuz.

    “The world will not be spared from the ramifications of this dangerous conflict,” Jenča said, urging countries to act in line with international law and the UN Charter.

    (NAN)

  • U.S. bombing of Iran started with a fake-out

    U.S. bombing of Iran started with a fake-out

    As Operation “Midnight Hammer” got underway on Saturday, a group of B-2 bombers took off from their base in Missouri and were noticed heading out toward the Pacific island of Guam, in what experts saw as possible pre-positioning for any U.S. decision to strike Iran.

    But they were a decoy. The real group of seven bat-winged, B-2 stealth bombers flew east undetected for 18 hours, keeping communications to a minimum, refueling in mid-air, the U.S. military revealed on

    As the bombers neared Iranian airspace, a U.S. submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles. U.S. fighter jets flew as decoys in front of the bombers to sweep for any Iranian fighter jets and missiles.

    The attack on Iran’s three main nuclear sites was the largest operational strike ever by B-2 stealth bombers, and the second-longest B-2 operation ever flown, surpassed only by those following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States by al Qaeda.

    The B-2 bombers dropped 14 bunker-busting GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 30,000 pounds. The operation involved over 125 U.S. military aircraft, according to the Pentagon.

    From the U.S. military’s perspective, the operation was a resounding tactical success. The Iranians were unable to get off a single round at the American aircraft and were caught completely flat-footed, General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon on Sunday.

    “Iran’s fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran’s surface to air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission,” Caine said. “We retained the element of surprise.”

    Read Also: Renewed Hope: NDDC plans retreat, agric summit for Niger Delta

    Caine said initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites targeted sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact.

    U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was more confident.

    “It was clear we devastated the Iranian nuclear program,” he said, standing alongside Caine in the Pentagon briefing room.

    ‘A lot of talk earlier last week about, you know, Iran, potentially threatening to close the Strait of Hormuz, which you know is interesting to see. The oil markets didn’t necessarily place that much of a premium on it.

    Gulf states, home to multiple U.S. military bases, were on high alert on Sunday as they weighed the risks of a widening conflict in the region.

    Guarding against blowback, the U.S. military also dispersed U.S. military assets in the Middle East and heightened force protection for U.S. troops.

    Hegseth said the U.S. military was positioned to defend itself in the Middle East, but also to respond against Iran if it goes through with longstanding threats to retaliate.

  • Israel, Iran: the changing face of warfare

    Israel, Iran: the changing face of warfare

    Days after Israel launched its air war against Iran on June 13, both United States president Donald Trump and Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu disclosed that for now they had no intention of targeting the Iranian leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, despite knowing his whereabouts. Obviously, the two leaders view the Ayatollah as a legitimate target of war, but conceded that he would not be taken out. Their views on the matter of targeting the Ayatollah have, however, started to change, particularly on the Israeli side. Moments after Iran achieved a direct hit on the 1,000-bed Beersheba Soroka Medical Centre in the South of Israel, Israel’s Defence Minister Israel Katz asserted: “A man like [Khamenei] has always aimed at destroying Israel through his agents. This man, who is willing to attack us, must not stay alive. This matter, the matter of stopping this man, eliminating him, is part of the campaign, and we now understand his role because before, he was talking about the destruction of Israel.” During his visit to the damaged hospital, Mr Netanyahu confirmed that ‘all options are open’ on the subject of the Ayatollah’s assassination, declaring that ‘no one is immune’ and that his killing would not escalate but end the war.

    Here in Nigeria, former Foreign Affairs minister Bolaji Akinyemi argued on a television programme last week, saying: “It is against international law to threaten to assassinate a head of state. And incidentally, it is also against American law.” While the eminent professor may be partially right, it is not clear that in war any head of state is an illegitimate target. In any case, while assassinating a head of state by a powerful country may attract retaliation, it is unlikely it is also justiciable. Shortly after Israel launched its campaign against Iran, reports indicated that President Trump restrained Israel from assassinating the Ayatollah. Clearly, Israel had left that option on the table and had the Ayatollah in their crosshairs. That the assassination was not attempted when it was most feasible may actually be due to Mr Trump’s influence. From all indications, if the opportunity presents itself again, Israel may take it if the war becomes protracted or if more civilian targets are hit in Israel.

    READ ALSO: How we contracted infections using school toilets – Pupils

    In the opening stages of the Russo-Ukrainian war in February 2022, Russia targeted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky in order to capture or kill him. Analysts suggest that there are no laws preventing the targeting or killing of an opposing head of state during war. For tactical, strategic and even political reasons, a vulnerable head of state may be spared, but otherwise he might be taken out in order to demoralise the country and weaken the resolve of that country’s military. Mr Trump’s reluctance to countenance the elimination of the Ayatollah may be an indication that the US had learnt lessons from its experience in Libya and Iraq where they connived at the killing of Muammer Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein respectively only to be confronted by post-war chaos. While Israel seems sure that a post-Ayatollah Iran could not be worse than the present situation, the US appears unsure the aftermath would be as easy as some think.

    Thousands of years ago, the world was more realistic and less fussy about the law of war. Captured or brutally killed heads of state were often displayed as war trophies, sometimes their eyes gouged out and all sorts of physical atrocities inflicted on them. The victorious kings and emperors were unconcerned about any post-war chaos in defeated countries or kingdoms, many of which were left desolate. In fact, sometimes, the victorious powers engaged in wholesale depopulation of defeated kingdoms, committing genocide which no one queried, and perpetrating massive abuse against women and children. On the surface, wars have got more circumscribed by laws and regulations. But wars have nevertheless not got neater. Indeed, they have become deadlier and genocidal. Clearly, Prof. Akinyemi’s remonstrance was directed against assassinations in peace time, some of which the US perpetrated in the past few decades. Even the law of war relating to war crimes can only be applied to minion states and kingdoms. Those laws do not deter powerful countries like the US, China, or Russia from erasing whole communities or assassinating enemy heads of state. Often, no one is dominant enough to enforce compliance against the powerful.

    Should Israel decide to assassinate Ayatollah Khomenei, he would be a legitimate war target. But they must then determine whether managing post-war Iran would fit into or fulfill their regional and political expectations. Decades ago, Israel had chances to take out the late Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) leader, Yasser Arafat, but they spurned the idea because they were unsure his successor would not be even more fanatical. The US acknowledges that while nothing precludes the assassination of enemy heads of state, regardless of what their parliament say about assassinating foreign leaders, the aftermath, they have learnt, has often been more volatile and unpredictable. They recall their experience in Cuba, are mystified by the emergence in Syria of Ahmed al-Sharaa (nom de guerre: Abu Mohammed al-Julani) who allied with al-Qaeda during the country’s long civil war, and saw first-hand the complications that accompanied the regime change in Iraq that birthed ISIS.

    As galling as it is, global reality scorns the law of war or creatively interprets its provisions. For a long time to come, no matter how vociferously critics rail against leadership excesses, might will continue to be right. Israel knows that. So, too, do the US, China, Russia and some hermit kingdoms whose leaders have no incentive whatsoever to travel to countries where they might be arrested should the International Criminal Court (ICC) feel seized by the urge to do something.

  • Iran, Israel, and the ghosts of a relationship gone bad

    Iran, Israel, and the ghosts of a relationship gone bad

    By Nishtha Gautam

    As Tehran and Tel Aviv continue to bomb each other, it is impossible to wrap one’s brain around the time, not so distant in the past, when Iran and Israel were each other’s trusted allies in the West Asia region. In a twisted way, however, Iran still seems to be helping Israel. In furthering Israel’s narrative of being the victim. Iran, in turn, stands as isolated today as its arch enemy Iraq once was.

    How was the road to Iran’s isolation, not just regional, paved? As opposed to the popular view of the American grandstanding on peace, which has been altering the geopolitical landscape of West Asia, Iran’s downfall has been largely of its own making, ably aided by Israel. While Iran didn’t recognise the nationhood of Israel, it saw the nascent Jewish state as an ally in the project of regional dominance. Israel needed non-Arab allies, too. It was a good deal for both. After a decade of covert collaboration, Israel became more upfront about its friendship with Iran post the Suez War of 1956. Both Israel and Iran viewed Gamal Abdel Nasser’s Pan-Arabism and Soviet communism with great apprehension.

    Through the 1960s, Tel Aviv and Tehran were instrumental in strengthening the Kurds fighting the regime in Iraq, a Shia-majority country ruled by the Sunni establishment. It’s difficult to believe today, but the Israeli Mossad worked closely with its Iranian counterpart SAVAK, to support the Kurdish resistance. Even the 1967 Arab-Israeli war was not a deal-breaker for this relationship based on common geopolitical interests. If anything, it bolstered Iran’s trust in Israel’s strength after the latter defeated Jordan, Egypt and Syria. The Shah regime held close ties with Israel and continued military, economic, and intelligence cooperation, and both worked against the Ba’athist Iraq.

    READ ALSO: How we contracted infections using school toilets – Pupils

    In 1973, when the Arab world stood united against the United States and Europe for their support of Israel and stopped selling them oil, Iran firmly stood in the corner of Israel. It was an expedient move on the Shah’s part as Iran became the leading beneficiary with bourgeoning oil revenues. Iran’s oil was fuelling the West.

    When Israel Had Iran’s Back

    Israel seems to have forgotten today that the missiles landing on its cities are probably thanks to Project Flower, a 1977 joint Iranian-Israeli development programme of advanced missile systems. Even after the regime change in Iran after the 1979 revolution, the reliance on Israel continued unabated, despite the public stance of the Ayatollah against the Jewish state. When Iraq, boosted militarily by both the Americans and the Soviets, invaded Iran in 1980, the Islamic Republic needed Israel more than ever before. And Israel delivered!

    In violation of the sanction policy of its mentor, the US, the Israeli government supplied weapons and other military hardware to Iran in the early 1980s. Saddam Hussein’s war against Iran cemented the military and intelligence collaboration between Tehran and Tel Aviv. But something was about to change.

    The US sanctions against Iran in the aftermath of the 1979 hostage crisis, when 66 American citizens were held captive by an Iranian student group in Tehran to demand the extradition of the Shah, announced that the days of Iran-US bonhomie were over. The religious extremism of the Islamic Republic began to overshadow its pragmatism, and what could have been an inter-regime squabble soon turned into a full-blown geopolitical crisis in the next decade.

    The Coming of Netanyahu

    The Islamic Republic not only started amplifying its anti-Jewish state rhetoric, but it also started painting Iran as a victim of the West-style modernity. Tehran-Tel Aviv cooperation continued covertly, as if on life support, till the mid-1990s. With Benjamin Netanyahu’s first Prime Ministerial stint starting 1996, the anti-Iran paranoia began to take root in Israel.

    Thanks to Iran’s support for Hezbollah and Hamas in a bid to emerge as a regional heavyweight, the Israelis pinned every regional conflict they faced on the Islamic Republic. This development had ramifications beyond West Asia. Post 9/11 attacks, Iran tried a rapprochement with a hostile US, citing an alignment of interests in terms of destroying the Taliban in Afghanistan. Washington rejected this “Grand Bargain” proposal, and George W Bush famously declared, “States like these and their terrorist allies constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world,” referring to North Korea, Iran, and Saddam’s Iraq.

    A lonely existence

    Netanyahu has been consistently working towards painting Iran as the biggest threat not only to regional stability in West Asia but also to the interests of the US. The “axis of evil” clubbing has been detrimental to Iran’s economic and geopolitical standing, exacerbated by the Islamic Regime’s constant attack on the West-corrupted Iranians who do not adhere to religious diktats. Iranian dissenters have been the biggest allies of the Israeli overtures against the Islamic Regime.

    With the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and the continuing Russia-Ukraine war, one of the rare allies of Iran, Putin, too, is in no position to help. Beyond the usual rhetoric of opposition to Western hegemony, Moscow cannot provide any substantive assistance to Tehran. Not to forget Netanyahu’s persistent lobbying efforts, which have led to Putin not giving Syria the S-300 anti-aircraft system. Tehran cannot rely on Moscow’s support. It appears the same with China. Beijing is more heavily invested, despite the rivalry, in the US economically than in Russia or West Asia, and money trumps friendships almost every time in international affairs.

    Iran’s isolation, therefore, can be summarised in this couplet by Salik Lakhnavi, a Progressive Urdu poet:

    Khuda aazmaae sanam aazmaae

    Sanam jaante haiñ khuda jaanta hai

    (God tested me, my beloved tested me

    God knows, my beloved knows).

    *This article was first published in www.ndtv.com