Tag: Islamisation

  • ‘Obasanjo’s utterance on Fulanisation, Islamisation inciting’

    A professor of Islamic Studies at the Kwara State University (KWASU), Sulaiman Jamiu, at the weekend described the statement credited to former President Olusegun Obasanjo on alleged Fulanisation of Nigeria and Islamisation of Africa as in inciting.

    Prof Jamiu, who is the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academics) of the university, said this in Ilorin, the state capital, at a Ramadan lecture organised by the University of Ilorin (UNILORIN) Muslim community.

    The lecture was titled: Spirituality in the Security of a Nation: Lessons from Ramadan.

    He said: “When I read that statement, I was shocked, considering the position of the former President and where the speech was made. That could be inciting. I have great regard for the former President. He is the only President that has bettered the lot of lecturers in this country. But I least expected a statement from a statesman like him.”

    Jamiu said the influence of materialism in the country had turned herdsmen and others to criminals.

    The don noted that the stark illiterate in the society want to keep up with the Jones.

    He said: “Let us ask ourselves few questions on why Boko Haram insurgency, as one of the security challenges, remains up to date insurmountable, despite all measures taken by the Federal Government, including military might and strategies. The reason is that the government approach to solving national security is of materialistic provision at the expense of spiritualistic care. They forget the fact that the most difficult phenomenon to deal with is the influence of belief or ideology already sunk into people’s mind.

    “Boko Haram’s devilish teaching did not start in 2009 or originated by Muhammad Yusuf in Maiduguri, as expressed by many writers (The Da’wah Coordination Council of Nigeria 2009); rather, it was a reappearance of the supposed suppressed Maitasine syndrome of 1980 in Kano by the Federal military forces.

    “As a matter of fact, Muhammad Yusuf’s father was an ardent follower of Maitasine who was killed along with their leader, Muhammad Marwa Maitasine.

    “The point being made here is that the failure to address the problem of insecurity in Nigeria from ideological perspective, especially Boko Haram, will continue to survive to generation to come. God forbid!”

    The don urged Muslims to put the lessons of Ramadan into contentious practice at all time to reduce insecurity in the country.

    “This is to say Muslims, after being imbibed with the lessons of Ramadan and become spiritually transformed into being conscious of the Omnipresence and Omniscience of God in all spheres of life, it should serve as a model in governance, military services, security agencies, private individual businesses, socio-economically and politically.

    “Hence, Muslims would be contributing immensely to the efforts of the government at reducing the rate of crime in Nigeria and invariably  making lessons learnt in the month of Ramadan felt in tackling our security challenges,” he said.

  • Nigeria: Islamisation or Christianisation?

    Preamble

    Two monotous and meaningless words are frequently used mischievously in Nigeria. One is Islamization. The other is maginalization. The one is used religiously while the other is used politically.  None of the two words can be found in any English dictionary because they are  coinages of some Nigerian mischievr makers who find religion and politics as tools for their game of mischieve. Thus, the two words are sometimes interchangeably used as missiles either as a way of disarming their perceived opponents or as a form of psychological intimidatton against them. Invariably, the two ridiculously monotonous words often used as hate speech are from the same source. Were the users of those words well informed, they would have known that such monotony is like an old song with a sour taste  that is unfitting to a civilized society and its continuity is clear evidence of blatant ignorance on the part of those who still cling to it.

     

    MUSWEN’s Reaction

    In a reaction to the use of the word Islamization by the Chritian Association of Nigeria (CAN), in reference to Nigerian secondary school curriculum recently,   the Muslim Ummah of Southwest Nigeria (MUSWEN) issued a press statement to put the record sreaight. Excerpts from the statement are as followa:

     

    Blackmail

    “The allegation of Islamis zation of the country is not a novelty. Whenever the Christian leaders find it difficult to constructively engage with an issue that relates to Muslims in the country, they readily resort to the false allegation of Islamization as blackmail. Unfounded claims of Islamization have now assumed such a ridiculous that it is now a laughing matter in the comity of nations.

     

    CAN’s belligerence

    We have watched with calmness how the leaderships of both the CAN and the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) have, in recent times, taken such a combative posture in their seeming hatred for Islam and the Muslims that the once pwaceful coexistence between the adherents of Islam and Christianity in Nigeria have become mutually suspicious on any issue. Most worrisome is the recent pronouncement by the National Christian Elders’ Forum (NCEF) which paraded a number of retired Christian Generals including the hitherto  respected elder statesman, General Theophilus Danjuma.

    In a communiqué issued at the end of its meeting held in Abuja on Thursday, 13th July, 2017, which was reported in several newspapers (eg The Punch, July 14, 2017; Page 14), NCEF referred to what it regarded as “stealth/civilization Jihad” (whatever that was supposed to mean) and “violent Jihad”. The body accused those it called “Islamists” of plotting to impose what it described as “Sharia ideology” on the country. Furthermore, their understanding of the term “taqiyyah” to which they made reference was, to say the least, misinformed and an indication of their wrong perception of    Islam as a religion and a way of life.

    It was obviously mischievous for Nigerian Christian elders to ignore the fact that Boko Haram group chose a predominantly Muslim region as its theatre of war and devastated  its economy as much as it killed its people. At least, an overwhelming majority of those attacked were Muslims, and most of the places bombed were Mosques. What further evidence does anyone need to be convinced that the agenda of the Boko Haram group is largely targeted at mainstream Islam?

     

    Christian Generals

    MUSWEN is very disappointed that most of the news reports on the meeting of the NCEF highlighted the presence of retired Christian Generals at the meeting. Was this a deliberate act of intimidation? And what signals were those retired Christian Generals sending to the entire world?

     

    The Curriculum Issue

    The allegation, reportedly made by the National Christian Elders’ Forum (NCEF) at the same meeting, that the introduction of Religion and National Values as part of the revised curriculum for Basic Education “denigrates Christianity and promotes Islam” cannot be credited with evidence.

    In the same vein, the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria’s (PFN) claim made at its meeting held in Benin City on 29th June, 2017, that the Nigerian Education Research and Development Council (NERDC) was used as an instrument of religious indoctrination in favour of Islam (See: The Punch, Friday, July 14, 2017; Page 9) is false and highly misplaced.

    We are, however, delighted by the statement credited to the Senate President, Senator Abubakar Bukola Saraki, when a delegation of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) visited him on Wednesday, 12th July, 2017. Senator Saraki was reported to have said to the delegation:

    “You will remember that in 2010, the past administration came up with reforms on how to reduce the number of subjects at the basic education level… There were about 20 subjects at that time, and subsequently they were reduced to 12… In the process of implementing those reforms, we have this problem. Why I am saying this is so we don’t leave here and believe that it was done to favour one religion over the other… Now the reform is clearly not working. So our responsibility is to look into that reform and make it work.” (See:http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/236774- saraki-speakscrk-irk-curriculum-controversy.html)

    When religious leaders can no longer address issues dispassionately without resorting to blackmail, blatant lies and falsification of facts to promote hatred against others, then the very foundation of the moral values of such leaders is largely questionable. “If gold should rust, what will then become of iron?”

    In Retrospect

    It should be recalled for posterity sake that the revised curriculum in question was approved in 2014 during the time of the former President Goodluck Jonathan, a Christian. It is also instructive to note that the Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Education Research and Development Council (NERDC) at the time was Prof Godswill Obioma, a Christian. (See: http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/166030-nigeria-revises-basic-educationcurriculum.html). What more, the Minister of State for Education, who superintended over Basic Education matters at the time, was no other person than Barrister Nyesom Wike, the current Governor of Rivers State who is a Christian! The question then is: why are the Christian leaders making a mountain out of a mole hill now that we have a Muslim President? If there is a need for policy change why can’t they say so without resorting to name-calling?

     

    The Misinformed CAN President 

    The CAN President, Rev. Samson Ayotunde, during his visit to the Acting President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo was reported to have referred to the Arabic language in the curriculum as “Islamic Arabic Studies”. (See: http://staging.thenationonlineng.net/can-visitsosinbajo-demands-five-point-agenda/). For CAN President’s information and others like him, there is no such subject as “Islamic Arabic studies in Nigeria’s curriculum of education. Arabic is a language, like English, French or German, and not a religion as mischievously claimed by CAN’s President.

    Arabic is not only spoken by over 700 million native and non-native speakers across the world including many Christians and it is also one of the six major languages used for the conduct of official bussiness of many international organizations including the United Nations (UN).

     

    Sultan speaks

    In a recent pronouncement, the Sultan of Sokoto and President-General of  Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA), His Eminence, Alhaji Muhammad Sa‘ad Abubakar, vehemently refuted the claim of ‘Islamization’ of Nigerian polity saying that Muslim leaders had been in the forefront of the demand that the study of religion should be made compulsory in public schools. In fact, Muslims have always insisted that every child should be taught the religion of his or her parents in line with the relevant provisions of the Constitution of Nigeria. (See Section 38 (1), (2) and (3) of the 1999 Constitution). We stand by this.

    It is, therefore, a welcome relief that the Federal Government has announced that both Islamic Studies and Christian Religious Studies should now be taught as stand-alone subjects throughout the country. We hope this will finally lay to rest all the avoidable insinuations, blackmails and falsehood being disseminated to Nigerians by CAN and its agents through the media.

     

    Christianisation Rather than not Islamization

    It is ironic that those who inherited and perpetrated the imposition of a colonial Euro-Christian educational system on Nigeria are the ones now mischievously alleging Islamization of education in Nigeria. It is a fact of history that for more than a century, particularly in Yorubaland, educational system was the potent instrument employed to “catch them (Muslim children) young” by Christian evangelical teachers who subject those Muslim school pupils to Christian indoctrination and force them to drop their Islamic identities for those of Christianity. Thus, ‘Christianization through education’ agenda was been consistently pursued with vigour for decades even though virtually all the schools were grant-aided by governments. Virtually every Muslim family in Yorubaland has a story to tell about the historical subjection of Muslim pupils and students to a crude but brutal Christianization agenda through education.

    Even today, many Christian teachers and school administrators still deny Muslim pupils  their religious rights as Ministries of Education in many States refuse to employ teachers of Islamic Studies apparently as a way of forcing those pupils to take Christian Religious Studies .

     

    CAN’s hypocrisy

    CAN’s bellicose objection to anything Muslim, such as the provision of access to interest-free financial services, is held with shock and amazement. Ironically, the governors of some predominantly Christian-populated states in the country have either secretly obtained or applied for interest-free loans from the Islamic Development Bank (IDB), an institution which they  often publicly condemn or derogate. It was a onetime Christian President, Chirf Olusegun Obasanjo who facilitated the country’s membership of the Islamic Development Bank to the immeasurable benefit of all Nigerians irrespective of their religions and most of the beneficiaries of that facility are Christians. Yet, the irritating noise of Islamization of Nigeria continues to sound loud.

     

    Conclusion

    The challenges facing our nation today call for a profound spiritual and moral overhauling of the polity. Giving a child education without the fear of God amounts to making him or her a clever devil. The immoral practice of subjecting a child to instruction or participation in a religion other than that of his or  her parent’s is criminal and should be stopped forthwith. This is the only way to have a truly pluralist society and a peaceful nation. God save Nigeria!?

  • The National Grazing Reserve Bill and Islamisation of Nigeria

    The National Grazing Reserve Bill and Islamisation of Nigeria

    Recently, the media (print and electronic including the social media) have been awash with outcries on the proposed `National Grazing Reserve Establishment and Development Commission Bill (SB. 60)’, which the 8th Senate has come out strongly to deny. But we need to make certain clarifications here. The Senate denied the presence of such bill in this 8th Senate; it did not deny the existence of such bill. The Chairman, Senate Committee on Rules and Business, Senator Babajide Omoworare admitted that the bill was presented to the 7th Senate by Senator Zaynab Kure (representing Niger Central) but was not passed.

    This clarification by the Senate, commendable as it is, has done very little to calm down nerves especially of people down southern Nigeria; neither has it explained why a bill supposedly dead at the 7th Senate should suddenly become a front-burner issue even when it has not been allegedly re-presented to the 8th Senate. Truth is that someone is not telling us the truth. As our people say, smoke precedes the real fire; the toad does not run in the afternoon for nothing. It is either a snake is pursuing it or something dreadful is after it…

    “In 56 years, Nigeria has consolidated a dubious political culture that emphasizes the primacy of sectional interest over and above the national interest…”

    “Today, the present government of Muhammadu Buhari is determined to throw Nigeria further into the miry clay of death with a nebulous bill on grazing reserves. The Senate has said the bill is not before it but we know better…”

    “The bill seeks to establish a National Grazing Reserve Commission that will acquire, hold, lease or dispose of any property, moveable or immoveable for the purpose of carrying out its function…”

    “From the south-west to the south-east and south-south of Nigeria, there is no end to the tale of woes wrought on communities and individuals by this band of terrorists posing as herdsmen. Lacking in any moral conscience and civility, these Fulani herdsmen deliberately graze their cattle on people’s farm lands where crops are just germinating; or fully matured and ready for harvesting or even harvested crops still on the farmlands. Experience has shown that the natives would confront them to know why they are grazing their cattle on such areas and typical of the Fulanis, they would never show any sign of remorse. Instead, like what happened in Awgu town of Enugu State recently, the Fulanis would organize chilling attacks against the entire community at night using high assault rifles, machetes and military or police camouflage. This was actually the strategy used by Othman Dan Fodio in conquering the entire core northern Nigeria i.e. the use of terror and by the power of the sword in the name of jihad. In this way, tens of thousands of people were butchered. The same is happening in Nigeria today and we cannot stand idly by and watch this savagery continue.

    This brings me to the critical question of what fate awaits Nigeria in the event of the passage of such satanic and obnoxious bill into law. While the Fulanis or any other ethnic group in Nigeria reserves the right to determine their future in Nigeria, such self-determination must not, in any way imperil other ethnic groups. That Nigeria is an amorphous amalgam of strange bed-fellows is no longer news. What is actually worrisome is why various governments in Nigeria have refused to appreciate the danger facing the country.

    There is no doubt that Nigeria is country in dire straits. As the literary avatar, Chinua Achebe, once observed, Nigeria will die if we keep pretending that she is only slightly indisposed. From the north to the south; and from the east to the west of Nigeria, there is no end to the human atrocities bedeviling this country. If it is not the Boko Haram menace in the north, with its Samouri Ibn Lafiya Toure type of earth-scotch policy of annihilation motivated by jihadist zeal; it will be the violent youth militancy in the Niger-Delta or the peaceful but intense resurgence of the Biafran agitation in the south-east or the subtle but virulent ethnic irredentism in the south-west under the aegis of Afenifere and the O’odua People’s Congress (OPC). Yet in the midst of all these things, those in positions of authority in Nigeria carry on as if all is well…”

    “I am always amazed at arguments by even those one could describe as educated and enlightened suggesting that Nigeria’s problems can be solely located within the confines of good leadership. Admittedly, good leadership is sine-qua-non for the stability and progress of any society; but it does not fall from the sky…

    Nigeria’s institutions are fundamentally extractive and this is not surprising given the mode of creating the Nigerian state through colonial fiat. The seeds of catastrophe were sown into the foundation of Nigeria. Nigeria’s foundation is faulty…

    “In the past three decades, I have admonished our people that the future is bleak; that doomsday awaits us if we fail to take urgent steps to save our country and ourselves. I have at various times argued that Nigeria’s problems cannot be solved in isolation of the fundamental ingredients of restructuring. Genuine and good leadership cannot exist in the absence of inclusive economic and political institutions; institutions that are anchored on a properly restructured polity.

    Britain did not create Nigeria in the hope that it will survive. Deliberate studs were put in the way of Nigeria’s survival as a country. The unilateral lumping together of disparate ethnic nationalities into one country is analogous to the emergence of nations in Europe. Nigeria is the size of about ten countries in Europe today. Why didn’t the colonial powers of Europe lump those nations into one country?

    The ones they did in former Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia crashed in their face even in our time. By now it has become so clear to even kindergartens that the primary motive for creating Nigeria was economic. The colonial masters never pretended about this…”

    “In 1996, Sir Peter Smithers, an under-secretary in the British colonial office then, released his memoire. In that memoire, he noted that the reason for lumping together so many ethnic nations in Nigeria was to create a large political structure that would play a dominant role in Africa and global politics. However, he went further to lament that “with the benefit of hindsight, I have come to understand that this was a fundamental error; if we had the benefit of hindsight on the collapse of former Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia, perhaps we would have created smaller ethnic nations. The bringing together of many different ethnic nationalities into the Nigerian project has resulted into structural deficits and has caused many tragedies and would continue to do so until the structural problem is resolved”.

    This is the testimony of one of the actors in the creation of the Nigerian conundrum. What else can be so glaring to us than that our major problem is structural? History is generous with the fact that if a society fails to get its politics right; it would never get its economy right. Nigeria has failed to get her politics right and it is not surprising that our economy has been in the woods despite enormous human and natural endowments.

    Thus, Nigeria has remained in the mud not necessarily because of our geography or cultures or because its leaders do not know which policies that would be enunciated and implemented for the good of the country; but essentially because the leaders have deliberately chosen to ignore the time-honoured truth that a country is poor or rich is determined by the incentives created by institutions, and that the way we play and structure our politics would inevitably determine what type of institutions we have…”

    The adoption of a federal system of government by the nationalists at that time was the only safe way to ensure that Nigeria continued to exist as a country…”

    “Structural imbalance, therefore, is at the heart of the Nigerian problem…” “Having conquered the native people, British colonialism went ahead to establish its machinery of governance. The colonial masters wanted to know the numerical strength of the various peoples they conquered. Thus, in 1931 the colonial authorities conducted the first census in Nigeria, and identified ten major ethnic groups including Hausa, lgbo, Yoruba, Fulani, Kanuri, Ibibio, Munshi or Tiv, Edo, Nupe, and ljaw. However, the 11th edition of the Nigeria Handbook, observed that there are also a great number of other small tribes too numerous to enumerate separately but it would be a mistake not to designate them ‘tribes’.

    The Handbook noted that each of these small tribes is a nation in its own right with many tribes and clans, essentially because there is as much difference between them as there is between Germans, English, Russians and Turks for instance. The fact that they had a common overlord in British colonialism did not and still does not destroy this fundamental difference. This is a confirmation that the various nationalities in Nigeria are strange bed-fellows.

    The way out is not to introduce any nebulous bill like the national grazing reserves commission bill but to gather round a table to renegotiate the existence of this country. Buhari cannot run away from this reality. Former Presidents Obasanjo and Jonathan have provided the platforms for such renegotiation. These platforms are contained in the recommendations of the 2005 National Political Reform Conference and the one Jonathan convoked in 2011. I hope someone in the presidency or national archives would avail Buhari the documents. Nigeria’s recipe for survival lies in those documents.

  • Islamisation and other red herrings

    Islamisation and other red herrings

    Many years from now, students in Political Science departments in Nigerian universities would be studying the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) 2015 presidential campaign under the theme: ‘How not to run a campaign.’

    This is not to suggest that the All Progressives Congress (APC) has run a flawless campaign either. Fortunately for them, their rivals are gifting them with so many blunders and unforced errors it’s almost like Christmas all over.

    For all the ruling party would want to crow about as its achievements, its record regarding the economy, insecurity and corruption is the sort you run from – not run on.

    The statistics about fadama fields, almajiri schools, federal universities created and Nigeria being the largest economy in Africa are not resonating because the administration’s failing are even more graphic – dwarfing President Goodluck Jonathan’s modest achievements.

    I speak in terms of an insurgency that has killed tens of thousands of Nigerians and, in the last two weeks, produced a gory first with claims that 2,000 people may have been killed in the assault on Baga. Over 200 schoolgirls snatched from their dormitory in Chibok remain in the hands of Boko Haram maniacs – symbols of the regime’s helplessness.

    The photograph of a stadium full of the desperate unemployed who gathered together last year for an ultimately fatal job interview with the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) is reminiscent of the picture of a snaking line of the jobless used to devastating effect by the Tories against the British Labour government in 1979. The poster carried the simple legend: ‘Labour isn’t Working.’

    A string of financial scandals – beginning with claims by the former Central Bank Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, that billions of dollars that ought to have been remitted by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to the Federation Account were missing, to the Stella Oduah armoured cars saga, to the botched arms shopping run in Johannesburg, South Africa, left the government mired in a swamp of sleaze. Earnest explanations of its officials have done little to wash the administration clean.

    All of these play into the age-long narrative that our public officials are serial bunglers only looking out for their pockets. There’s nothing the government has done in its time to make many think of it differently.

    It is therefore not surprising that the PDP campaign seems to have lost its way. Put on the defensive from the outset, it has scrambled for a coherent argument for reelection. It was never going to convince anyone about its competence: the opposition had successfully defined it as incompetent long before the campaigns started.

    Today, the ruling party isn’t really making the case why it should be given another chance: it is desperately trying to stop the other side from winning. The strategy according to officials of the campaign team is to make APC presidential candidate, Muhammadu Buhari, the issue.

    If he’s perceived as honest, make him look dishonest. If people think he’s strongwilled and firm, make him look weak and beholden to entrenched interests. But more than anything play up the religious card and tell anyone who cares to listen that he’s the ultimate Islamic fundamentalist.

    But rather than get traction, the strategy has backfired spectacularly because the PDP – overconfident and conceited – left it too late. Just as the image of Jonathan not being up to the job took years to create, Buhari’s reputation was built over decades.

    His actions over the years have only helped to concretise that perception. Little wonder they call him Mai Gaskiya – meaning the truthful one. It is wishful thinking to believe that his image for uprightness will be so damaged by a contrived certificate controversy that his legion of followers would suddenly convert to Jonathan’s cause two weeks to Election Day.

    The major plank of attack lined up against the APC and its candidate was that they were out to Islamise the country. The hope was that in the age of Boko Haram, Christian voters north and south of the Niger out of fear and sectarian hatred, will not touch the opposition party because of the religious smear.

    Unfortunately, the attacks soon collapsed under the weight of illogicality and scrutiny. First, pseudo-historians and rogue clerics banged on endlessly about how Turkey succumbed to Islam. What they don’t tell us is how location and the historical forces at work then made this possible. We are now to assume that because it happened where East meets West, it must of necessity happen here too.

    At this point Nigeria can only be Islamised in two ways. First one is legally through an amendment of the constitution. That is a non-starter because it would require the Houses of Assembly of 24 states to concur and then the National Assembly to pass it.

    The other way is by conquest – the route that Boko Haram is going by carving out its so-called caliphate in North Eastern Nigeria. Islamisation by conquest is easier as it doesn’t require national consensus or agreement.

    However, as a nation it is within our power to decide to roll over and be overrun or to stand up and fight for a way of life that allows our people to worship God whichever way they choose. Even without waiting for some central government in Abuja people will fight to remain free and maintain their cultur.

    Unfortunately, the ruling party’s strategists made a fatal mistake in trying to position Jonathan as a bulwark against Islamisation. His record doesn’t support the borrowed robes he’s been draped with.

    It was under the nose of this great scourge of the Muslim hordes that hundreds of mostly Christian schoolgirls were snatched in Chibok. They have since been forcibly converted to Islam by Boko Haram. While this was happening, the president didn’t even believe that the abductions happened. He preferred the fantasy that it was another gimmick by his enemies to make him look bad.

    Up till today, the poor girls remain trapped in the middle of nowhere. Still, the great defender of the Christian faith has not been able to secure their release.

    If we are to consider the fact that huge chunks of three North-Eastern states are in Boko Haram hands, then Islamisation may be happening faster under this administration given our inability to either keep the insurgents at bay, or defeat them militarily.

    Despite the fact that this line of attack has clearly passed its sell-by date, PDP strategists like Kamikaze pilots embarked on a suicidal mission, plunge ahead oblivious of all warning signals. They keep pushing the religion button hoping to win enough converts to prevail on February 14.

    Joining them in banging their heads against the wall are a coterie of Pentecostal pastors who have inserted themselves in the middle of the political free-for-all. They don’t care that by making religion an issue in this campaign they are encouraging hate and dividing our people even further along sectarian lines.

    This election will come and go and there will be a blowback for these clerics that will affect their standing in the larger society – and even worse – with their own flock.

    Luckily it is their standing that would be damaged and not the church because the God who has ordained that the gates of hell wouldn’t  prevail against His church is able to ensure it outlasts this season of political chicanery.

    The fate of the church in Nigeria cannot be tied to the political ambitions or fate of any individual – no matter how eminent. These persons on whom many are now hanging their Christian future will only hold office for four years at a time. When they vacate office, assuming they are elected, will Nigeria be governed forever by Christians – so as to stop the greatly feared Islamisation?

    Will Muslims never occupy the office of President after Jonathan? Just think about it.

     

    2015: More grandfathers needed

    Beyond his certificates and religious beliefs, the next big issue the PDP wants us to ponder before voting is the age of the candidates. One is 57 and the other 72.

    The excitable Ekiti State Governor, Ayo Fayose, and others have referred to him as a doddering grandfather who should probably retire to a rocking chair in the anonymous precincts of Daura. But this ancient grandfather may just be what Nigeria needs at this point in her history.

    If 54-year-old governors can be carrying on like adolescents, aren’t we better off with gentle, wise and deliberate septuagenarians running our affairs? Fayose in his infamous advertisement declaring that Buhari would die in office must have thought he was fighting Jonathan’s corner. But he was actually hurting him by denigrating a zone whose votes the president badly needs. It may just be that this 54-year-old is too young to understand the implications of his actions.

    Through the actions of intemperate politicians and other public figures, Nigeria finds herself more badly divided today than it has ever been in her history. Whoever wins the presidential elections would need to lead  national healing as an urgent task. And who better to tackle that assignment than a grandfather with a calm temperament?

     

    On Dasuki’s proposal

    Of all the excuses so far advanced by those who would like to see the February general elections postponed, the most ludicrous has to be that offered by the National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki. Speaking at a lecture in London during the week he suggested that the polls be moved to allow all eligible voters collect their PVCs. How considerate!

    Let’s stop postponing the day of reckoning. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) will never be 100% ready for elections. Even if the polls are moved six months or one year from now, the commission will still be battling with one thing or the other. If it isn’t PVCs, it would be card readers or ink pads.

    Even if all registered voters collect their cards as Dasuki would like, there’s no guarantee that there would be 100% turnout. So what is the point in postponing the polls just because some people haven’t collected their cards?

    There’s no excuse under the sun for postponing the polls. Every election cycle when it looks like something momentous is in the offing all sorts of people spring up trying to move the goal posts.

    It happened in the dying days of President Ibrahim Babangida’s regime when he began having second thoughts about ceding power. No one should be surprised that a figure so close to the sanctum of power in Abuja is making this curious proposal at an even more suspicious hour.