Tag: Israel

  • Tinubu urges pilgrims to Israel, Jordan to be prayerful, law-abiding

    Tinubu urges pilgrims to Israel, Jordan to be prayerful, law-abiding

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has urged Nigerian pilgrims traveling to Israel and Jordan to conduct themselves honorably and focus on their primary purpose of communion with God.

    Represented by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Sen. George Akume, at the flag-off ceremony held on Sunday, December 22, 2024, at the Chapel of Christ the Light, Alausa, Ikeja, Tinubu emphasized the importance of prayer, describing it as central to his administration’s values.

    “I encourage each of you to embrace this journey as a unique spiritual exercise. Reflect on your faith, deepen your connection with God, and let your actions inspire others,” Tinubu said. 

    He also urged pilgrims to pray for the success of Nigeria’s “Renewed Hope” agenda, the nation’s progress, and the well-being of families and communities.

    The president warned against absconding during the pilgrimage, stating, “Nigeria is our homeland. Let us all return after the exercise. The Nigerian Christian Pilgrims Commission (NCPC) has partnered with security agencies to ensure the safety and accountability of all pilgrims.”

    Bishop Dr. Stephen Adegbite, Secretary of the NCPC, highlighted the pilgrimage’s theme of restoration, citing Joel 2:25-26 as a guiding scripture. 

    He described the journey as a time for intense prayers for Nigeria’s revival and assured that 2025 would usher in divine breakthroughs for the nation.

    “President Tinubu believes in the power of prayer. His administration’s restoration and renewal agenda will surprise many. For the next 10 days, we will focus on praying for Nigeria, the president, and all citizens,” Adegbite said.

    Reiterating the government’s zero tolerance for absconding, he revealed strict measures to ensure that all pilgrims return to Nigeria. 

    “We are traveling with 354 pilgrims today, and operations will continue until May. Anyone thinking of absconding should reconsider because security details are in place. If you want to travel permanently, do it through proper channels.”

    Mrs. Ibijoke Sanwo-Olu, wife of the Lagos State Governor, urged pilgrims to view the journey as a chance for personal and collective transformation.

    “This pilgrimage is spiritually, morally, and culturally significant. Use this opportunity to pray for Nigeria’s peace and development. Let your conduct reflect values of humility, service, and love,” she said.

    She reminded the pilgrims that they are ambassadors of Nigeria and expressed confidence that they would return as agents of change in their communities. 

    She also assured them of the Lagos State Government’s support throughout the pilgrimage. 

  • Israel, Hezbollah: shape of new war

    Israel, Hezbollah: shape of new war

    After last Wednesday’s truce between Israel and Hezbollah (euphemistically described as a truce between Israel and Lebanon), both sides to the conflict have claimed victory. It was reminiscent of the 2006 2nd Lebanon war between the two sides, with both also claiming victory, and the Israeli Winograd Commission describing it as a missed opportunity to disarm Hezbollah. Would this latest truce lead to a permanent cessation of hostilities, and perhaps, optimistically, a peace deal? Few on both sides think there is prospect of a peace deal anytime soon. The latest conflict lasted for about 13 months, triggered in the main by Iran’s prompting and the Gaza war. Hezbollah, apart from being one of the Middle East’s deadliest and probably the most equipped proxy militia of Iran, is an armed non-state actor as well as a political party in Lebanon founded after the 1st Lebanon war (1982) and the eviction of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) from Lebanon.

    Stung by its failings in the 2006 war, and in view of the political ‘bloodletting’ that followed the war, Israel learnt its lessons and prepared far better for the next war which they knew was inevitable. After many skirmishes, that war finally came in September, accompanied by a lot of war razzmatazz starting with James Bond-type moves (explosions of thousands of rigged pagers and hundreds of walkie-talkies as well as targeted assassinations that eliminated nearly all Hezbollah leaders) and ending with incredible precision bombings that ignored and made nonsense of human shields. Hezbollah may have declared victory to buoy up the confidence of its supporters, but its fighters and Iran knew they were beaten this time. Who won or who lost, a debate that will continue perhaps long after the conflict, is, however, not as important as what the war foretells about the future of wars. Taken together with the war in Gaza against Hamas, this latest conflict effectively sounds the death knell for the role of human shields as a war tactic, regardless of the arguments and warrants of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    Two major tactics describe the Hamas and Hezbollah wars against Israel: the deployment of a maze of tunnels as a war tool and use of human shield to limit or castrate attacking forces. Both failed in the ongoing war in Gaza and the Hezbollah conflict now circumscribed by a two-month ceasefire. Unlike previous wars in which Israel deployed general and conventional tactics in dealing with the conflicts, the Hamas and Hezbollah wars saw the deployment of new Israeli tactics of targeted eliminations. Top commanders of both Hamas and Hezbollah were eliminated in the opening days and weeks of the conflicts, including a significant number of the second layer of the militias’ leadership. Tunnels dug under civilian homes and health and educational institutions were breached or bombed regardless of collateral damage. The Israelis showed that tunnel warfare had limited efficacy in deterring the enemy. They also proved, notwithstanding ICC warrants, that human shields would not deter the deployment of massive ordnances. In both World War I and World War II, carpet bombings of civilian and military infrastructures were routine. But in the 21st century, the world has become more squeamish about civilian casualties, leading to many militias deploying human shields. In the years ahead and wars to come, neither tunnels nor human shields, nor any civilian infrastructure such as schools or hospitals, will deter military tactics or disproportionate use of firepower.

    Debates are already ongoing about whether Israel should have acceded to cessation of hostilities in the Hezbollah war, given its experience in 2006 when the militia was not disarmed and continued to menace Northern Israel. Opinions are divided down the middle. What is clear, and which Israel’s political and military leaders probably know, is that Hezbollah is so integrated into the Lebanese body politic that defeating them completely may be unrealistic. Continuous degrading of the militia’s fighting capability, and disconnecting them from Iranian influence and control may be a more sensible option. Until Iran took over the financing of Hezbollah, Syria used to be its paymaster and controller. By a combination of war of attrition with Israel and civil war triggered by the Arab Spring, Syria unburdened itself of Hezbollah almost the same way Qatar is unloading Hamas. There is, therefore, no conclusive indication that Israel might be throwing away a golden opportunity in dealing with and eliminating Hezbollah. The truce provides for the withdrawal of Hezbollah behind the 121km Blue (Litani River) Line, and the withdrawal of Israel Defence Forces (IDF) from southern Lebanon. If nothing endangers the tentative truce, the ceasefire could be turned into something more permanent. But as long as Hezbollah does not disarm, and given its influential role in the Lebanese parliament and politics, not to talk of the intransigence of Iran, it is hard to see peace being restored to Lebanon and northern Israel. Hezbollah may have been considerably weakened by Israeli attacks, but it remains to be seen whether that weakening is sufficient enough to strengthen the Lebanese Army to take control of the country’s armed forces, or position the parliament to impose control over the country’s politics.

    Read Also: Israel poised to approve ceasefire with Hezbollah, says official

    In so many important and unprecedented ways for Israel, the Hamas and Hezbollah wars have shattered the illusions that tunnels and human shields were a foolproof way of resisting the enemy and even defeating it. Gradually, both Hamas and Hezbollah may be compelled to reexamine their military doctrines and repose more hope in political and diplomatic solutions to longstanding political impasse. If the world made only a token gesture of rising against what they presumed to be Israeli genocide against civilians, and the Middle East itself paid only lip service to the cause of Palestinians championed by Hamas and Hezbollah, any future or replica erection of human shields against an enemy, particularly in a war triggered by the weaker side, may prove nugatory.

  • Israel poised to approve ceasefire with Hezbollah, says official

    Israel poised to approve ceasefire with Hezbollah, says official

    Israel looks set to approve a U.S. plan for a ceasefire with the Iran-backed Hezbollah on Tuesday, a senior Israeli official said, clearing the way for an end to the war which has killed thousands of people since it was ignited by the Gaza conflict 14 months ago.

    Israel’s security cabinet is expected to convene later on Tuesday to discuss and likely approve the text at a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the official said.

    This would pave the way for a ceasefire declaration by U.S. President Joe Biden and French President Emmanuel Macron, four senior Lebanese sources told Reuters on Monday.

    In Washington, White House national security spokesperson John Kirby said on Monday, “We’re close” but “nothing is done until everything is done”.

    The French presidency said discussions on a ceasefire had made significant progress.

    The agreement has already won approval in Beirut, where Lebanon’s deputy parliament speaker official told Reuters on Monday there were no serious obstacles left to start implementing it – unless Netanyahu changed his mind.

    Netanyahu’s office declined on Monday to comment on reports that Israel and Lebanon had agreed to the text of a deal.

    Read Also: Heavy security as France host Israel  

    Hezbollah, seen as a terrorist group by Washington, has endorsed its ally Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri to negotiate.

    The plan requires Israeli troops to withdraw from south Lebanon and Lebanese army troops to deploy in the border region – a Hezbollah stronghold – within 60 days, Elias Bou Saab, Lebanon’s deputy parliament speaker, and a second Israeli official told Reuters.

    Signs of a breakthrough have been accompanied by military escalation, with Israeli airstrikes demolishing more of Beirut’s Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs on Monday.

    The destruction across wide areas of Lebanon brings into focus a huge reconstruction bill awaiting cash-strapped Lebanon, with more than 1 million people displaced.

    In Israel, a ceasefire will pave the way for 60,000 people to return to homes in the north, which they evacuated as Hezbollah began firing rockets in support of its Palestinian ally Hamas a day after that group’s Oct. 7, 2023 assault.

    Israel has dealt Hezbollah massive blows since going on the offensive against the group in September, killing its leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and other top commanders, and pounding areas of Lebanon where the group holds sway.

    The group has kept up rocket fire into Israel, firing some 250 rockets on Sunday.

    Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, said on Monday that Israel would maintain the ability to strike southern Lebanon under any agreement. Lebanon has previously objected to Israel being granted such a right, and Lebanese officials have said such language is not included in the draft proposal.

    Israel would be able to strike against “imminent threats” only, the second Israeli official said.

    U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said on Monday gaps between the two parties have narrowed significantly but there are still steps they need to take to reach an agreement.

    Read Also: Hezbollah rocket hits near Tel Aviv after Beirut airstrike

    “Oftentimes the very last stages of an agreement are the most difficult because the hardest issues are left to the end,” he said.

    “We are pushing as hard as we can,” he added.

    In Beirut, Bou Saab told Reuters on Monday there were “no serious obstacles” left to start implementing a U.S.-proposed ceasefire with Israel, “unless Netanyahu changes his mind”.

    Over the past year, more than 3,750 people have been killed and over one million have been forced from their homes, according to Lebanon’s health ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in its figures.

    Hezbollah strikes have killed 45 civilians in northern Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

    At least 73 Israeli soldiers have been killed in northern Israel, the Golan Heights, and in combat in southern Lebanon, according to Israeli authorities.

    Biden’s administration, which leaves office in January, has emphasised diplomacy to end the Lebanon conflict, even as all negotiations to halt the parallel war in Gaza are frozen.

    U.S. Middle East envoy Brett McGurk will be in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday to discuss using a potential Lebanon ceasefire as a catalyst for a deal ending hostilities in Gaza, the White House said.

    Diplomacy over Lebanon has focused on restoring a ceasefire based on UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the last major war between Hezbollah and Israel in 2006.

    It requires Hezbollah to pull its fighters back around 30 km (20 miles) from the Israeli border, behind the Litani River, and the regular Lebanese army to enter the frontier region.

    Israel has long complained that 1701 was never properly implemented, pointing to the presence of Hezbollah fighters and weapons at the border.

    Lebanon has also complained that Israel has violated the agreement, noting regular violations of Lebanese airspace by Israeli warplanes.

    (Reuters/NAN) 

  • Israel sends two planes to evacuate fans after Amsterdam violence

    Israel sends two planes to evacuate fans after Amsterdam violence

    Israel has sent two planes to evacuate fans from Amsterdam after violent clashes between Israeli supporter and pro-Palestinian demonstrators on the fringes of Ajax  versus Maccabi Tel Aviv Europa Cup match.

    “The Prime Minister has directed that two rescue planes be sent immediately to assist our citizens,.

    “The harsh pictures of the assault on our citizens in Amsterdam will not be overlooked’’ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office posted on X on Friday morning.

    The Israeli leader’s office called the incident horrifying and demanded that the Dutch government and security forces take vigorous and swift action against the rioters, and ensure the safety of our citizens.

    This clash was however unclear and yet to be unfolded.

    The exact events remain unclear. The violent disturbances occurred around the Europa League football match between Dutch club Ajax Amsterdam and Maccabi Tel Aviv on Thursday evening. Ajax won 5-0.

    There were clashes in several locations in the centre of the Dutch capital; though it was not specified which side started the violence.

    Around 60 people were detained temporarily on Thursday evening, the police said.

    Amsterdam TV station AT5 reported that demonstrators threw chairs at Maccabi fans.

    The police’s mobile units reportedly shielded the Israelis and escorted them to their hotels.

    There were also clashes in the afternoon between Israeli football fans and security forces in the city centre.

    Read Also: Ten injured, three missing after violent clashes in Amsterdam

    According to police, about a dozen people were arrested for disturbing public order and illegal possession of fireworks.

    Even before the match, there were isolated altercations near the stadium in the south-east of the city, the police said.

    More than 200 demonstrators attempted to reach the venue, according to the police.

    Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof condemned these “unacceptable antisemitic attacks on Israelis’’ on X and said he had since spoken with Netanyahu.

    Far-right Dutch leader Geert Wilders called it a pogrom.

    “We have become the Gaza of Europe,’’ he said, adding that Muslims with Palestinian flags were hunting down Jews.

    Israel’s UN ambassador also referred to the incident on X as a pogrom.

    Steffen Seibert, Germany’s ambassador to Israel condemned the incident.

    “Chasing and beating up Israeli soccer fans is not anti-war protest.

    “It is criminal and intolerable and we must all stand against it. As a European I am ashamed to see such scenes in one of our great cities,’’ he wrote on X.

    However the Reaction from the United States (U.S.).

    In New York, Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), described itself as the world’s largest anti-hate organisation.

    He demanded that the Dutch government ensure the safety of Israeli fans, apprehend and prosecute the perpetrators and apologise for the violence.

    “This is exactly what ‘globalise the intifada’ looks like,’’ Greenblatt wrote on X, saying there were mobs of hate-filled people who had attacked Israelis who came to Amsterdam to enjoy a football game.

    Even New York Attorney General Letitia James chimed in on X, calling the attacks against Jews in Amsterdam “deeply disturbing and horrifying.’’

    New York State, particularly metropolitan New York City, has a large Jewish population.

    “We must do everything in our power to protect Jews in America and across the world.

    “This anti-Semitism and violence must end now,’’ she wrote. (dpa/NAN)

  • Ten injured, three missing after violent clashes in Amsterdam

    Ten injured, three missing after violent clashes in Amsterdam

    Three Israelis are missing following clashes between Israeli football fans and pro-Palestinian demonstrators on the fringes of football club Maccabi Tel Aviv’s match in Amsterdam, according to Israeli authorities.

    Ten people were injured in the violence, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said on Friday morning.

    The degree of their injuries was initially unclear.

    Read Also: Israel’s Netanyahu fires defence Minister Gallant

    The ministry urged its citizens to use public transport to travel to the airport, after Israel had announced it was sending two planes to evacuate the fans.

    Local security forces had been deployed, the ministry said.

    The ministry had initially advised fans not to leave their hotels.

    It also advised its citizens not to wear Jewish or Israeli symbols in public. (dpa/NAN) 

  • Middle East: Struggle between Israel and Iran

    Middle East: Struggle between Israel and Iran

    Last Saturday, October  26, missile  and air attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran by Israel were predictably expected and from all indications were choreographed to do tolerable damage on the aerial defence of Iran and damage the republic’s missile and drone production while avoiding its nuclear infrastructure and economic assets of oil and gas production. It is expected that Iran would exercise restraint and not go on tit-for-tat military response. But there is no certainty in all this. What needs to be said as an independent observer is the fact that the two dominant powers in the Middle East are Israel and Iran. They have again emphasised and demonstrated their resolve to protect and defend their interests no matter what. This fact was even recently asserted by the Israeli prime minister,  Benjamin Netanyahu  in a moment of candour, when he said that the  two ancient peoples of the Middle East, the Persians and the Jews would have to accommodate each other with the caveat that the Iranians must get rid of its obscurantist  terrorist, Shia, fundamentalist  regime bent on destroying the Jewish state of Israel while the Iranian government  on the other hand sees Israel as a Zionist regime imposed as a cancer on the Middle East on peaceful Arab population who are justly struggling to be free.

    Can these two wide gulfs in perception and strategic positions be bridged? The two regimes are victims of their own history and until they go from historical perception to the reality of the moment, peace would not be achieved. Whatever anybody may wish to say, it is a fact that Israel has come to stay. On its own, Israel is a major military power in the Middle East. In terms of science and know-how, Israel is a major contributor to knowledge and the wise application of this knowledge is power in the hands of the state of Israel.  With a population approaching 10 million, 2.1 million of which are Arabs, in an area of 22,145 square kilometres (8,630square miles), Israel is 420 kilometres in length and 115 kilometres in width at the widest point. Israel is much smaller than Belgium and compared with Nigeria’s size of 923,770 square kilometres, Israel is very tiny. While geographical size of a state may be an element of power because it would be difficult to quickly overrun and overpower such a state, but size is not always a big asset and the compact size of Israel means, it can easily be defended.

    The people of Israel are highly educated and can easily be mobilised in crisis.  Israel is a closet nuclear power. Israel also enjoys almost an unquestioning support of the most powerful country in the world, the United States. Some have even argued that it is the Israeli tail that wags the American dog!

    On the other hand, Iran (Persia) is a country of ancient people, the Persians who since Biblical times have maintained imperial dominance on the Middle East and part of Asia stretching to Afghanistan and across to South Asian modern states of Pakistan and India. Darius the great the fourth king of the Achaemenid Persian empire stretching from the Caucasus and West Asia to the Balkans in south eastern Europe and even to Egypt and North Africa before the birth of Christ ruled almost 44% of the then known world. In relatively recent times, it was the Persians who dominated the Islamic world, founding the largest empire during the Abbasid Caliphate between 750 and 1258, the third Islamic empire after Prophet Muhammad.

    In short, even in the present era, Persia or its modern variant, Iran, has been a victim of European occupation during the First World War by Russians in the North and the British in the South and during the Second World War by Germans and The Allies. The country as a result of its abundant oil and gas has been a victim of Anglo-American oil political shenanigans in relatively modern times until the Islamic revolution rid the country of foreign domination and influence. Iran has a proud past and is not likely to want to be subservient to any country either in the Middle East or anywhere else. There is no doubt about Iran’s place as a force in world history.

    Read Also: More than 60 wounded in Hezbollah drone attack on Israeli military site

    Iran follows the Shia tradition of Islam which seems to be the dominant tradition in Iraq, parts of Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and some parts of Afghanistan while the rest of the Islamic world follows the much more loosely organised conservative Sunni tradition that does not appear to have the hierarchical clergy of Ayatollahs and grand Ayatollahs.

    The strength of Iran lies in its vast territory of 1,648,195sq kilometres (636,372 sq. miles).

    It has a multi-ethnic population of 90 million people; the multi ethnicity is considered a source of weakness for the state and working towards fissiparous tendencies in the country. Iran has vast reserves of oil and natural gas. Iran is relatively scientifically advanced with capable nuclear scientists with capacity to produce advanced nuclear reactors and some will say nuclear bombs for which the country has been under severe sanctions by the United States and the rest of its western allies.

    Iran maintains strategic but loose ties with Russia and China but not on the same level that Israel has with the United States and its allies in the West. The proximity of Iran to the Arab states is both an asset and weakness strategically. American forces and influence in countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE sometimes poses a threat to Iran. A western led or Israeli war with Iran could lead to the destruction of gas and oil infrastructure in the Arab Middle East, the blockade of the straits of Hormuz, the major shipping of oil and gas to the rest of the world passes and consequent collapse of global economy. Because of this, a general war between Iran and Israel backed by the United States is very unattractive. This is why America would do its utmost to prevail on Israel not to be too aggressive and adventurous towards Iran.

    By taking on Gaza and Lebanon and particularly the parts dominated previously by Nasrallah and the party of God – Hezbollah and decapitating the movement by killing its leaders and also killing Yayah Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza and Ismail Haniyeh in Iran, Israel has achieved most of its war aims. The long hand of Iran around Israel has been cut and the threat posed by Iranian proxy near Israel has been virtually neutralized. In other words Israel doesn’t need to continue the war and this is the time to have ceasefire and negotiations with its neighbours and work towards a two-state solution with the rump of Palestine which is not likely to pose any threat to it. With peace with the Palestinians, the casus belli between Iran and Israel would have been removed and Iran can concentrate its efforts of economic development at home while remaining a champion and protector to weak Gulf and Arab states and maintaining a modus vivendi with Israel.

    Peace is a necessary condition for development and countries just have to get used to a world in which hopefully war will become old fashioned. This is particularly necessary in the tinderbox of the Middle East, the most explosive part of the world where there is an intermixture of religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam), sea and air routes and energy resources.

  • Remembering October 7

    Remembering October 7

    By Steve Egbo

    October 7 has become for Israel what 9/11 was to the United States. A day to remember. It was the day a great power let down its guard and incured the humiliation and devastation of the enemy – an inferior enemy, but one that is motivated, determined, hateful, obdurant and unyielding. That is what happens when hubris and delusional arrogance are allowed to detract  national security consciousness. It is said that no matter how strong one may be, either as an individual or a nation, care must be taken never to underestimate the capacity of a determined enemy. That reality was brought home to Israel and it’s leaders in a way they will never forget. On October 7, 2023, Israel and it’s leaders woke up to a new reality. That new reality is that in a confrontation between the elephant and the rattle snake, the elephant is expected to crush the rattlesnake underfoot, but if the elephant loses focus, the little enemy would strike with amazing ferocity. And that strike could prove fatal.

    The state of Israel was declared on May 14th, 1948, and five Arab countries went to war war on the 15th – the next day.  These Arab nations declared their aversion to the existence of a Jewish state in their midst. From the floors of the United Nations General Assembly to the fields of Palestine, they made clear their mandate “to drive the Jews into the Sea”. The political and religious leaders of the Arab world described the destruction of Israel as “an act pleasing to God and religion”. And every Arab state swore to the achievement of that objective. Several decades later, not so much has changed. The hatred and anger have not diminished, and neither the tears and bloodshed. Iran, a non Arab country, got involved on religious and ideological bases, complicating the situation even more. We will return to that later.

    On this account, Israel fully understood the circumstances of its existence and was determined not to oblige those that wished them ill. The remnants of the world Jewry, bleary-eyed and exhausted from  Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’, knew that they had no option left. Either to  fight to the death or be led meekly to the slaughter once again. They choose the former. They fought an impossible war and won a unique victory. The War of Consolidation in 1948, was a war that astonished every observer. John Stoessinger in his book, “Why Nations go to War” noted that even the most sophisticated military strategists and analysts around the world could not stop asking “how did they do it?”. Israel’s survival in 1948 was attributed to many unusual factors, not the least, ‘the hand of God’.

    Read Also; Manchester United the only problem in my life – Adekunle Gold

    In the years that followed, many more wars were fought – major wars, minor wars, incursions, skirmishes, expeditions and military actions. Israel has never stopped fighting. However the Yom Kippur War of October, 1973 was Israel’s costliest war in both man and treasure. But it was to alter the thinking of some of Israel’s enemies. For the first time since 1948, Israel’s territory was breached and the penetration went so deep that Israel saw itself on the brink of defeat. But Israel rallied and launched an offensive that altered the regional map. Yom Kippur solidified Israel’s position as a power in the Middle East. Suddenly it became very clear that the Middle East has a regional super power – Israel. Israel’s invincibility was anchored on three basic paradigms: a superior military complex, an extraordinarily resourceful intelligence apparatus and solid American backing.

    Some of the belligerent Arab states grudgingly came to the realization that the goals of ‘annihilation of Israel’ was no longer realistic. Israel had become too powerful for its enemies to handle. Some of their neighbors decided to rethink their strategy and pursue the path of peace. Successive  American governments played key role in mid-wifing the peace processes. First to make  peace with Israel were – Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994). Later on, more Arab states normalized relations with Israel. These were, UAE, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco all in 2020. Saudi Arabia, a major power in the Middle East, was at the threshold of signing a peace deal with Israel last year when Hamas, with the backing of Iran, struck on October 7,  the 50th anniversary of Yom Kippur.

    The question many have asked and kept asking was – “why did Israel go to sleep on the anniversary of Yom Kippur?” Why such huge intelligence failure even among her equally capable allies? What were the Mossad, CIA and MI6 doing? “How did this happen?” The Arabs believe in symbolism and the significance of numbers. They pay great attention to such equations. Yom Kippur is an important date in the Arab psyche. Yom Kippur broke the backs of the Arab enemies of Israel and forever altered the regional balance of power in the Middle East.

    Israel ought to have known that their enemies do not forgive and they do not forget. They only bid their time. It is amazing that the delicate planning and flurry that went into October 7 took place right under the noses of the Mossad and CIA.

    In an article I wrote on October 8, a day after Hamas invasion, I stated that “Hamas has opened the gates of hell”. Events of the last one year have proved that it was not an exaggeration. The repercussions have been horrendous. On all sides. Hamas, ordinary Palestinians and Israelis have all paid a huge prize – in blood and tears. And the crisis has continued to escalate, sucking in other actors from different places. It has become a rallying point for all the Israeli haters in the region – Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthi rebels in Yemen, Islamic resistance group in Iraq, Syrian based militia, and other Palestinian factions in both the Gaza strip and the West Bank.

    Behind these group, pulling the strings, goading them on, is the Islamic republic of Iran, an imperial theocracy that imagines itself a global power. Iran is a sworn enemy of Israel and the west, particularly the United States. Iran is a latter entrant into the melee. Following the revolution of 1979, the new regime led by Ayatolla Khomeni, felt buoyed on to spread its brand of Islamic revolution across the Middle East and wherever possible. Iran declared that “Israel must be wiped off the map” and commenced an intensive nuclear program to back up its zeal. In addition, Iran provides weapons, technical knowhow, finances and other forms of logistics needed to keep Israel’s enemies in business.  They call themselves “the axis of resistance”, whereas America and its western allies call them “the axis of terror”. While these groups may enjoy the silent sympathy of other renowned autocracies – China, Russia, North Korea and Turkiye, only Iran is known to provide material sponsorship for their activities.

    In mid April, Iran took the unprecedented step of direct attack on the territory of Israel by firing hundreds of drones and missiles into Israel. Teheran said the attack was a response to Israeli strike on its embassy in Syria, a few weeks earlier, which had killed both Iranian and Syrian officials. Israel, with the help of the US and UK intercepted most of the drones and later retaliated with airstrikes on targets inside Iran. The April exchange marked a new dimension in the conflict between Iran and Israel. For the first time, Iran mustered the boldness to hit Israel directly. Israel’s response were airstrikes on Iranian targets including Iran’s air defense facility in the town of Isfahan. But these strikes were largely symbolic as massive international pressure was mounted on Israel to avoid undue escalation of tension in an already very volatile region.

    In the last few months, Israel has intensified its policy of ‘targetted assassination’ against its enemies. The most prominent were Hamas leader, Ismail Haniyeh, Hezbollah commander, Ibrahim Aqil and the founder and spiritual leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasralla. Once again, Iran vowed a harsh response against Israel. Late in the afternoon of Tuesday, October 1st, the US issued a warning of imminent Iranian attack on Israel. Several hours later, the night sky was lit up by hundreds of ballistic missiles fired into Israel by Iran. Some of the missiles were so sophisticated they could cover the 1000 mile distance between Teheran and Tel Aviv in less than 15 minutes. With US assistance, Israel was able to shoot down most of the missiles, but some managed to penetrate Israeli defenses and inflict damages. Israel immediately declared it would return the attack. And in the last few days, the world is holding its breath in anticipation of what Israel’s response would be.

    Back in April, when Israel was attacked by Iran for the first time, massive international pressure was mounted on Israel to show restraint. And it did. This time the story will be different. Israel will retaliate and Israel will hit hard. There are four or five areas of attack open to Israel. One is to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities, but the US is strongly opposed to that. President Biden was specific on that point. The second target would be Iran’s oil fields, but again president Biden has advised against that. The third is Iran’s conventional military installations including the IRGC. The fourth is Iran’s industrial base, and lastly, Israel may decide to go for regime change by attempting to take out the political leaders of Iran. Whatever Israel does in the days ahead, the Middle East is facing a conflagration. Iran has fought Israel over the years through proxies and third parties and Israel had been on tenther hooks to engage Iran directly. Israel believes that the threat posed by Iran would never be resolved diplomatically, and that someday, there will be a reckoning. That day may have come with Iran coming out openly to strike Israel.

    It is no longer a question of whether Israel will confront Iran. The question is when? And to what degree? For now, it will be difficult to correctly project what the outcome will be, but the devastation on all sides will be enormous. Sure, America will stand with Israel, fully and completely, even at the risk of being sucked into a war it had always wanted to avoid, and also with a presidential election barely weeks away. America’s allies, particularly the UK, France and Germany will also get involved. China and Russia will issue statements and condemnations here and there, but will not go beyond rhetorics. Russia would have been willing to lend logistics to the ‘axis of resistance’ but Russia is seriously bogged down in its own adventure. Piong yang will seize the opportunity to fire more missiles into the sea and keep it’s neighbors awake through the nights. The Arab states have lost the appetite for war with Israel. Many of their political leaders are willing to make peace with Israel and tap into the developmental template which Ben Gurion offered as far back as 1948. Some of these Arab countries will not be unhappy to see Iran humbled. Iran is sustaining the Arab – Israeli conflict through the use of non-state actors. And this is what makes it imperative to curtail Iran’s meddlesomeness.

    In conclusion, my expressly held opinion is that this war is long over due. It is time for Iran and Israel to settle scores. Without the war, the Middle East will continue to simmer and rumble. If I were in position to advise Israel, I would say “go for those nuclear facilities”. I have no doubt that the Middle East and the rest of the world will be safer if Iran’s fingers are pushed farther away from the nuclear buttons. But make no mistake, the war will be costly. To both sides. Israel will pay a huge prize. It is a war  Israel will not win but Israel will not be defeated either. Israel will inflict pains and Israel will endure severe pains. Israel will be fighting on several fronts – Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis in Yemen, Al Qaida remnants in Syria and Iraq. The other countries of the Middle East will make robust statements and strident calls for restraint, while trying to hide the smirks on their faces. Some will condemn Israel, send their diplomats on shuttles from one capital to the other, but none will get involved. The United Nations will hew and haw in its legendary impotence, and scurry around with humanitarian aid.  Eventually the furies will subside. The United States is a super power and the United States has the capacity to impose its will. But before they get to that juncture, some things will have to give. That is the way of the world.

    When Americans remember 9/11, they tremble. When Israelis remember October 7, they shudder. These traumatic emotions will not change. On October 7, 2023, more Israeli citizens were slaughtered than at any other time since the 2nd World War. On October 7, the guardians of Israel failed – the political leaders, the security forces and the intelligence agencies. It was a huge failure and there will be consequences. When all the furies are spent and rivers of blood spilt and the guns finally fell silent, the reckoning will commence. Heads will roll and this will include the (political) head of Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu rode to power on the carcass of the peace process and his sabotage of Oslo was not  a thought out program designed to bring peace and security to Israel. It was a short cut to keeping himself in power as he panders to the votes of the far right. The two-state solution which Yizkat Rabin and Yasser Arafat signed in 1993 would have ushered in a new dawn for the Middle East. The prevailing darkness may be long and bloody, but for those who have the capacity to look ahead, that dawn  will come. The radicals and extremists are having their say, but someday, and that day may not be long, the moderates and the progressives will have their way. Oslo will be resurrected and the land that gave the world its two greatest religions, will begin to reconstruct the road to peace. But for the moment, the days and months ahead will be very interesting.

     (Steve Egbo is a Lecturer/Resource Person with NILDS, Abuja)

  • The monsters in the Middle East

    The monsters in the Middle East

    Sir: Israel’s ongoing offensive against Palestinians in the Lebanon and the Gaza Strip is plunging millions into impossible situations, exposing the fairness of all in war as an atrocious injustice.

    Who is the monster in the Middle East? It should be Hamas, the militant Iran-backed pro-Palestine group. On October 7, 2023, it launched an unprecedented attack against Israel, breaching its supposed impenetrable security, killing 1200 Israelis and taking many others hostage.

     The monster in the Middle East should be Israel, which has since the attack launched an unprecedented crackdown against the Gaza Strip. More than 42,000 people have been killed, thousands more injured, and life irreversibly altered even for unborn Palestinians.

     The monsters in the Middle East should be the US and UK which continue to back the devastating Israeli offensive — and the international community, which choosing the easy escape route of international law, prefers largely to stand by.

     The monster in the Middle East could yet be Iran, which backs Hamas, and Hezbollah in Lebanon, which has been drawn into an increasingly complicated war. 

    The monster in the Middle East could yet be the vagaries of history, which seems to give each of the parties in the renewed hostilities a slice of justification for digging it their heels and putting millions of women and children in harm’s way.

     The monstrous conflict in the Middle East is a product of warped histories and complicities which are conspiring to sentence innocent Palestinian women and children to a living hell.

     But of all possible monsters in the conflict in the Middle East, Israel stands out for its complicated engagement with the history of the region and its egregious refusal to countenance any arrangement that may bring lasting peace to the region.

    Israel has starkly and strenuously refused to make significant concessions for peace, stubbornly clinging on to the land it has annexed, and blindingly branding all who disagree with it as enemies.

    Read Also: Operation Lake Sanity: MNJTF honours fallen heroes, wounded soldiers 

     In this expedition of enmity, it has been actively backed by the US in what is actively a collaboration of death against many innocent women and children.

    No matter how superior a party to a war is, once the first shot is fired, there is no certainty how it will end or who would suffer what casualty. This is what makes the unpredictability of war so dangerous.

    But what is going on in the Gaza Strip cannot even rightly be described as a war. Rather it is a genocide perpetrated by the colonizer against the colonized. This oppression and operation streaked with blood has been decades in the making.

    Israel’s annexation and subsequent occupation of Palestinian lands did not inspire as much horror in the rest of the world as it should because of the staunch support of the USA and UK, and the unflinching hypocrisy of the international community.

     But it was always going to inspire fierce resistance from a people suddenly turned to strangers and slaves on their ancestral lands. That is undoubtedly what has happened.

     Through invasions, displacement, curfews, embargoes, airstrikes, horrific psychological and emotional persecution, generations of Palestinians have been born into the struggle, lived through it and died in becoming generations of martyrs for their cause.

     There have also been poets like Mahmoud Darwish and Fadwa Tuqan who have deployed literature as resistance, resilience, and rebellion against a ruthless foe with Darwish famously asking, “where should we go after the last frontiers, where should the birds fly after the last sky?”

     Much like the Rohingya who have been left at the mercy and butchery of the immeasurably cruel state of Myanmar, the Palestinians have been left at the mercy of Israel, a state that does not know what mercy is.

    Peace is the only option that can guarantee lasting security for Israel in the region. Experience has shown that those fighting for their land are willing to continue writing their names with scarlet steam to achieve their cause.

    The hostility and humiliation of the world will not break them neither will the hypocrisy of the international community.

    •Kene Obiezu,keneobiezu@gmail.com

  • Biden, Israeli leaders, others mark October 7 attack on Israel

    Biden, Israeli leaders, others mark October 7 attack on Israel

    Global commemorations were held yesterday to mark the first anniversary of Hamas’ deadly October 7 attack on Israel.

    Israel’s President Isaac Herzog kicked off the event with memorials held to honour the victims and the hostages still in captivity in Gaza.

    Herzog began the day with a moment of silence at 6.29am – the time the attack began – at Kibbutz Reim, the site of the Nova music festival, where at least 370 people were killed by heavily armed Hamas fighters on October 7.

    Families of those killed attended the memorial, many of them crying, as Herzog met the crowd, an AFP correspondent reported.

    President Joe Biden also marked the event in a small White House ceremony accompanied by a prayer and a memorial candle.

    Biden stood in the Blue Room of the White House alongside First Lady Jill Biden and Rabbi Aaron Alexander, the head rabbi at Washington’s Adas Israel Congregation, as Alexander offered a prayer in both Hebrew and English.

    Read Also: Isreal DMW appreciates crew, Nigerians for begging Davido

    The somber ceremony was to remember the 1,200 killed and 250 hostages taken when Hamas militants invaded Israel. The attack sparked a conflict in the area that continues to grow.

    The prayer, known as “El Malei Rachamim” — or “God of Mercy” in English — is a prayer for the soul of a person who has died that is recited during burial and memorial services.

    After Alexander finished the prayer, Biden lit a Yahrzeit candle, a memorial candle that is lit on the anniversary of a person’s death, at which point the ceremony ended with a moment of silence.

    Also, United States has spent at least $17.9 billion (£14bn) on military aid to Israel since the war in Gaza began, a record, according to a report for Brown University’s Costs of War project, released yesterday.

  • Israeli strike forces closure of main crossing between Lebanon, Syria

    Israeli strike forces closure of main crossing between Lebanon, Syria

    Israeli warplanes on Friday launched an airstrike near the Masnaa border crossing between Lebanon and Syria, forcing its closure, security and border guards told dpa.

    The Masnaa crossing is the main crossing between the two countries, recently used by thousands of Lebanese and Syrians to flee the country after Israel started its offensive on Lebanon two weeks ago.

    Read Also: Hezbollah reports clash with Israeli forces in southern Lebanon

    Israel has been accusing the pro-Iranian Hezbollah movement of using border crossings between Syrian and Lebanon to smuggle weapons into the country.

    The Israeli army said it is looking into the reports.

    (dpa/NAN)