Tag: Jacob Zuma

  • S/Africa prosecutor turns down Zuma’s request to delay court case

    South Africa’s national prosecutor has turned down a request by former president Jacob Zuma to delay a hearing over a 2.5 billion dollars arms deal, a spokesman for the prosecutor said on Tuesday.

    The case will resume on Friday.

    Read Also: Zuma’s son risks jail term over woman’s death

    Zuma faces 16 charges including fraud, racketeering and money laundering relating to a 1990s deal to buy European military hardware to upgrade South Africa’s post-apartheid armed forces.

    Zuma, who has denied any wrongdoing, was in court in April in a procedural appearance.

    NAN

  • $2.5 bn arms deal: ‘I am innocent,’ Zuma tells cheering crowd

    Former South African president Jacob Zuma told thousands of supporters outside court in Durban on Friday that his opponents were telling lies and he would be proven innocent in a corruption case against him.

    Speaking in Zulu in his home province, Zuma said that the judiciary and politicians believed that he did not have rights.

    “The truth will come out. What have I done?” Zuma told the cheering crowd.

    “I am innocent until proven guilty.”

    The Durban High Court adjourned until June 8 the case of corruption in a 2.5 billion arms deal dollars, filed against Zuma.

    Zuma’s legal team and lawyers for the state agreed to the postponement to give both sides time to prepare their submissions relating to charges against Zuma including fraud, racketeering and money laundering.

    The 75-year-old, whose scandal-plagued nine years in office were marked by economic stagnation and credit downgrades, faces 16 charges including fraud, racketeering and money laundering.

    Zuma denies any wrongdoing and is challenging the decision to prosecute the case, a dramatic development on a continent where political leaders are rarely held to account for their actions before the law.

    Wearing a dark suit, a smiling Zuma waved to crowds of supporters and reporters as he climbed the steps of the High Court in Durban shortly before 0700 GMT.

    Zuma, who was forced to resign by the ANC last month, was at the center of a 1990s deal to buy billions of dollars of European military hardware to upgrade South Africa’s post-apartheid armed forces.

    The deal was mired in scandal and controversy from the start, with many inside and outside the ANC questioning the spending given the massive social issues, from health to education, Nelson Mandela’s party had to address after coming to power in 1994.

    Fallout has cast a shadow over South African politics ever since.

    Zuma was deputy president at the time. Schabir Shaikh, his former financial adviser, was found guilty and jailed in 2005 for trying to solicit bribes for Zuma from a subsidiary of French arms company Thales.

    The company is facing charges in the same case.

    Charges against Zuma were filed but then set aside by the National Prosecuting Authority shortly before he successfully ran for president in 2009.

    The charges were re-instated in 2016.

    Since his election nine years ago, his opponents have fought a lengthy legal battle to have the charges reinstated.

    Zuma countered with his own legal challenges.

     

  • $2.5 bn arms deal: ‘I am innocent,’ Zuma tells cheering crowd

    Former South African president Jacob Zuma told thousands of supporters outside court in Durban on Friday that his opponents were telling lies and he would be proven innocent in a corruption case against him.

    Speaking in Zulu in his home province, Zuma said that the judiciary and politicians believed that he did not have rights.

    “The truth will come out. What have I done?” Zuma told the cheering crowd.

    “I am innocent until proven guilty.”

    The Durban High Court adjourned until June 8 the case of corruption in a 2.5 billion arms deal dollars, filed against Zuma.

    Zuma’s legal team and lawyers for the state agreed to the postponement to give both sides time to prepare their submissions relating to charges against Zuma including fraud, racketeering and money laundering.

    The 75-year-old, whose scandal-plagued nine years in office were marked by economic stagnation and credit downgrades, faces 16 charges including fraud, racketeering and money laundering.

    Zuma denies any wrongdoing and is challenging the decision to prosecute the case, a dramatic development on a continent where political leaders are rarely held to account for their actions before the law.

    Wearing a dark suit, a smiling Zuma waved to crowds of supporters and reporters as he mounted the steps of the High Court in Durban shortly before 0700 GMT.

    The speed with which prosecutors have booked his day in court is a sign of the loss of control Zuma has suffered since his successor, Cyril Ramaphosa, became head of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) in December.

    Read Also: Zuma to appear in court April 6

    However, Zuma still retains some popular support, especially in his home province of KwaZulu-Natal, where the case is being heard.

    Heavily armed police in riot gear lined the square outside the court, as thousands of Zuma supporters gathered to express solidarity with a leader they say is the victim of a politically motivated witch-hunt.

    Marchers, many clad in the distinctive yellow, green and black of the ANC, carried placards reading “Hands off Zuma” and performed the high-stepping toyi-toyi protest dance made popular in South Africa’s decades-long struggle against apartheid.

    Businessman Siya Khoza said he admired Zuma’s determination to bring in economic policies that he said were designed to spread the wealth in what remains one of the world’s most unequal societies.

    “Whatever happens we will still support Zuma because we believe he brought us radical economic transformation and we still believe that him being in the ANC he will push for it,” said Khoza, wearing a waistcoat emblazoned in ANC colors.

    Zuma’ son Edward told supporters at nearby park where several thousand people held an overnight vigil that his father was not worried.

    “I would want to believe that as an innocent man, he is definitely not worried,” the domestic News24 agency quoted Edward Zuma as saying.

    Zuma, who was forced to resign by the ANC last month, was at the center of a 1990s deal to buy billions of dollars of European military hardware to upgrade South Africa’s post-apartheid armed forces.

    The deal was mired in scandal and controversy from the start, with many inside and outside the ANC questioning the spending given the massive social issues, from health to education, Nelson Mandela’s party had to address after coming to power in 1994.

    Fallout has cast a shadow over South African politics ever since.

    Zuma was deputy president at the time. Schabir Shaikh, his former financial adviser, was found guilty and jailed in 2005 for trying to solicit bribes for Zuma from a subsidiary of French arms company Thales.

    The company is facing charges in the same case.

    Charges against Zuma were filed but then set aside by the National Prosecuting Authority shortly before he successfully ran for president in 2009.

    The charges were re-instated in 2016.

    Since his election nine years ago, his opponents have fought a lengthy legal battle to have the charges reinstated.

    Zuma countered with his own legal challenges.

    NAN

  • Zuma faces corruption charges

    South Africa’s former President, Jacob Zuma, is in court on corruption charges related to a 1990s arms deal.

    The charges dogged his presidency and were reinstated in 2016, the BBC reports.

    He faces 16 –count charge of corruption, racketeering, fraud and money laundering at the High Court in Durban.

    Mr. Zuma, who was forced out of office in February, denies any wrongdoing.

    His supporters have descended on the city to rally for him, while his critics think court action is long overdue.

    The 75-year-old arrived at the court in his home province on Friday morning, smiling and giving thumbs up to the crowd.

     

  • Zuma to appear in court April 6

    South Africa’s former President, Jacob Zuma, was due to appear in court on April 6 to face charges of corruption in $2.5 billion arms deal, his lawyer said on Monday.

    The National Prosecuting Authority earlier this month said it would seek to prosecute Zuma on 16 charges, including fraud, racketeering, corruption and money laundering.

    The case is a dramatic development on a continent where leaders rarely face their accusers in court.

    “It was served at my Durban offices. The court date is April 6,” Michael Hulley told Reuters, referring to the summons.

    He declined to comment on how his client would respond to the matter.

    Zuma has repeatedly denied wrongdoing.

    Zuma, who was forced to resign by his ruling African National Congress (ANC) last month, was at the centre of a 1990s deal to buy European military kit that has cast a shadow over politics in South Africa for years.

    Zuma was deputy president at the time of the arms deal.

    Schabir Shaikh, his former financial adviser, was found guilty and jailed in 2005 for trying to solicit bribes for Zuma from a French arms company.

    The previous charges were filed against Zuma but then dropped by the NPA shortly before he successfully ran for president in 2009.

     

  • Zuma to face trial for corruption

    South Africa’s former President, Jacob Zuma, is to face prosecution for 16 charges of corruption, Chief Prosecutor Shaun Abrahams has confirmed.

    Mr. Abrahams said he believed there were “reasonable prospects of a successful prosecution.”

    The BBC reports the charges which the ex-President denies include fraud, racketeering and money laundering.

    Mr. Zuma, 75, was forced to resign as President last month by the African National Congress (ANC).

    He was facing his ninth no-confidence vote in parliament before he left office.

    The charges relate to a 30bn Rand ($2.5bn; £1.7bn) government arms deal in the late 1990s, before he became President.

    French arms supplier Thales will also face charges, a prosecutor said.

    Mr. Zuma is alleged to have sought bribes from Thales to support an extravagant lifestyle. His financial adviser at the time was found guilty of soliciting those bribes in 2005 and Mr. Zuma was later sacked as deputy President.

    He now faces one charge of racketeering, two charges of corruption, one charge of money laundering and 12 of fraud.

  • Zuma to face corruption trial

    South Africa’s former President, Jacob Zuma, is to face prosecution for 18 charges of corruption, and it is official.

    The director of public prosecutions confirmed on Friday that the charges include more than 700 counts of fraud, racketeering and money laundering.

    Zuma, 75, denies the charges.

    He  was forced to resign as president last month by the ruling African National Congress (ANC).

    The charges against  Zuma relate to a 30bn rand ($2.5bn) government arms deal in the late 1990s, before he became president.

    Shaun Abrahams, Head of the National Prosecuting Authority, said a trial court was the appropriate place for the matter to be decided.

    “There are reasonable prospects of a successful prosecution,” he said.

    Mr. Abrahams said he had dismissed representations made by Mr Zuma asking that the charges be dropped.

    The former ANC chief has always denied claims he received bribes from bidders in the deal.

    Zuma has faced a series of corruption related charges including the followings:

    • Zuma’s financial adviser, Schabir Shaik, was jailed in 2005 for fraud and corruption.
    • Zuma went on trial in 2006 but the case collapsed when the prosecution said it was not ready to proceed more than a year after he was charged.
    • South Africa’s National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) controversially dropped the charges in 2009, shortly before he won the presidency.
    • Political opponents campaigned tirelessly for him to face trial.
    • South Africa’s High Court reinstated the charges in 2016 and Zuma lost a Supreme Court appeal to overturn them.

    Zuma weathered an array of corruption allegations during his nine years in power.

    In 2016, a report by South Africa’s anti-corruption watchdog alleged that the billionaire Gupta family had exploited their ties with him to win state contracts.

    Both the Guptas and Mr Zuma deny any wrongdoing.

    The same year, South Africa’s highest court ruled that Mr Zuma had violated the constitution when he failed to repay government money spent on his private home.

    An anti-corruption body found he had spent $23m (£15m) on refurbishments including a swimming pool and an amphitheatre. He has since repaid some of the money.

  • S. Africa court finds finance minister violated constitution

    S. Africa court finds finance minister violated constitution

    A South African court held that Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba violated the constitution in statements he made about his decision to revoke his approval of a company’s bid to open a private airport immigration facility.

    The judgment is the latest legal blow to a senior South African government official and came with new President Cyril Ramaphosa considering a cabinet reshuffle after replacing scandal-plagued predecessor Jacob Zuma on Feb. 14.

    Handed down in December, the judgment only came to public light on Tuesday.

    Gigaba, whose job security under Ramaphosa is unclear, said he would challenge the decision.

    The judgment was issued after an application by Fireblade Aviation, a company owned by the wealthy Oppenheimer family, seeking to compel Gigaba to stick to his decision while home affairs minister to allow the firm to operate an immigration service for wealthy VIPs at Johannesburg’s main airport.

    Read Also:  Court jails man 60 years for child defilement

    The court ruling reversed Gigaba’s decision to revoke his approval, saying that the minister had lied in having “denied ever having approved the application”.

    “By telling a deliberate untruth on facts central to the decision of this case, the minister has committed a breach of the constitution so serious that I would characterise it as a violation,” the ruling read.

    Speaking to the media in Cape Town ahead of his budget speech to parliament, Gigaba said: “My lawyers are studying the judgment and we will respond to it in due time.

    “It’s important to highlight that the decision of the court is being challenged.”

    The Democratic Alliance, the official opposition party, said that based on the judgment, it had filed a complaint against Gigaba with the Public Protector, South Africa’s constitutionally-mandated anti-graft watchdog.

    NAN

     

  • South Africa to raise VAT for first time in 25 years

    South Africa to raise VAT for first time in 25 years

    South Africa will increase value added tax ( VAT ) for the first time in over two decades, the Treasury said on Wednesday.

    The Finance Minister, Malusi Gigaba, said while presenting the budget plan before parliament that VAT would increase to 15 per cent from 14 per cent effective April 1.

    VAT had remained unchanged since 1993.

    “This is a tough, but hopeful budget,” Gigaba said.

    “We decided that increasing VAT was unavoidable if we are to maintain the integrity of our public finances.”

    A VAT hike ran the risk of adding a heavy financial burden on the poor, but Gigaba said poor households would be cushioned through a zero-rating of basic food items such as maize meal and beans.

    The Treasury said the budget deficit was seen narrowing to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product ( GDP ) by 2020 from 4.3 per cent in the 2017/18 fiscal year.

    Expert said the increase was President Cyril Ramaphosa’s government aim to cut the budget deficit and stabilise debt after years of slow economic growth.

    Ramaphosa took over as leader of South Africa last week after Jacob Zuma stepped down on orders of the ruling African National Congress, bringing to an end nine years of corruption scandals and economic mismanagement.

    Zuma has denied all wrongdoing.

    The rand extended gains to 0.81 per cent against the dollar, government bonds firmed, while retail shares on the stock exchange due to the new three years budget outlay.

    Reuters/NAN

  • Reason behind calls for Buhari’s resignation,  by lawyers, activists

    Reason behind calls for Buhari’s resignation, by lawyers, activists

    To critics of President Muhammadu Buhari, the time to resign from office is now. He should follow the footsteps of former South African President Jacob Zuma. But others say that those behind the call are the corrupt who are uncomfortable with the President’s anti-graft crusade. They argue against putting Buhari and Zuma on the same scale, writes JOESPH JIBUEZE.

    THE support base for President Muhammadu Buhari’s anti-graft battle swelled yesterday with senior lawyers and activists berating those urging the president to take a cue from former South African President Jacob Zuma who was forced to quit office last week.

    They said there was no basis to compare Buhari, who is fighting corruption, to Zuma, who resigned on account of alleged corruption.

    “It was paradoxical that in Nigeria, the president is being asked to leave office for fighting corruption”, Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) Director Prof Ishaq Akintola said in a statement.

    Some Nigerians have asked President Buhari to follow Zuma’s footsteps by resigning from office.

    Advising Buhari to emulate South Africa’s immediate past president, the Action Democratic Party (ADP) berated the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of not doing enough to hold the President accountable.

    The local spokesman of the ADP in Lagos State, Adelaja Adeoye described the APC as a party filled with “yes men” leaders.

    Also in a twit, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chieftain Femi Fani-Kayode, said Buhari should be the next African leader to resign, following last year’s resignations of former Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe and Zuma last Wednesday.

    In his tweets in the night of Wednesday, last week, Fani-Kayode said it was time for African leaders who were so engrossed with power to step down.

    He wrote “First Mugabe went. Now Zuma is going.

    “Next Buhari will go. After that Biya and Museveni will go.

    In separate statements, two former presidents, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo and Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, urged Buhari to perish the idea of seeking a fresh mandate after the expiration of his four-year tenure on May 29, next year.

    But, the lawyers and the activists faulted the calls for Buhari’s resignation on the account of Zuma’s ouster.

    According to the MURIC director, corrupt Nigerians are those behind the attacks on President Buahri.

    Citing the example of South Africa, where Zuma was forced to resign from office after corruption charges were filed against him, Akintola, in a statement, said that it was paradoxical that in Nigeria, the president is being asked to leave office for fighting corruption.

    He noted that Nigeria has become the laughing stock of the outside world as two former presidents and the National Assembly have been doing everything to prevent the president from seeking a second term in office.

    Akintola said: “Former South African president, Jacob Zuma, was forced out of office last week for corruption charges. The South African Supreme Court had in October 2017 upheld about 800 corruption charges against Zuma before his party, the African National Congress (ANC) ordered him to quit.

    “Zuma’s exit from power is very didactic. It reveals South Africa’s mature democratic practice where a president is booted out for being corrupt whereas in Nigeria, our own president is being pressurised to leave office for fighting corruption.

    “Here lies the monumental paradox. The outside world must be laughing at Nigeria as they watch the unfolding drama. Two former heads of state have openly asked President Muhammadu Buhari not to seek a second term. The National Assembly is also fighting tooth and nail to get rid of the president as many of its members are enmeshed in corruption cases.”

    He said unlike many Nigerian politicians, Buhari owns no house abroad and neither has any stolen fund been traced to him.

    According to him, his selling point was his incorruptibility and those angling to stop him from contesting for a second term in office are doing so because he has plugged their means of siphoning public funds.

    “He has succeeded in blocking leakages through which our common patrimony has been siphoned into the private pockets of greedy politicians. Foreign countries endorse him as a leader of unassailable integrity and the naira is getting back its lost glory as a result of all these. Prices of goods are falling,” he said.

    The MURIC director added that the Buhari administration has diversified the economy, revived the railways and given the due attention to agriculture.

    He therefore urged Nigerians not to fall for the antics of “these corrupt and powerful individuals” as their main grudge with Buhari was that he has blocked their means of making easy money.

    The MURIC statement reads: “Diversification of the economy is turning other sectors into veritable sources of income. The railways are roaring back. Agriculture is once again taking its prime of place; electricity supply is witnessing unprecedented improvement while macadam roads are fast replacing the death traps which claimed hundreds of lives on a regular basis. Buhari’s social welfare scheme is already taking care of thousands of Nigerian youths.

    “The MURIC urges Nigerians to open their eyes very wide. Those who stole Nigeria’s money have become very powerful and they are using their stolen money to spread false propaganda to de-market Buhari. All the allegations of nepotism, religious bias and incompetence are tales from moonlight concocted by corrupt elements who want to bring back corruption.

    “For blocking their access to easy money, they wished Buhari dead. Based on their knowledge of the potency of the alleged gas poison conspiracy theory, they said Buhari was on life-support machine.

    They claimed he was dead and secretly buried. They made the claims with so much vehemence and total confidence that, with hindsight, we are constrained to believe that only those involved in the alleged attempt could have made such strong claims.

    “But when all that failed, they are now trying to incite the populace against him. They claimed that herdsmen were killing travellers on Lagos-Ibadan Expressway. They also claimed that the same herdsmen were slaughtering people like rams on Shagamu-Ore Expressway. Now, they are claiming that herdsmen have attacked workers in Ondo council office. But police debunked all these false alarms within hours.”

    Akintola identified corruption as the bane of the country and that Buhari has been tackling it head-on.

    He said: “We reaffirm our conviction that it was corruption that brought poverty and disease to the Nigerian nation.

    “Corruption was responsible for the bad roads. Corruption robbed us of a reliable public health and transport system. Corruption brought death in the air via frequent plane crashes. Corruption wrecked the Nigerian Airways and the Nigerian Railway Corporation. Corruption is responsible for insecurity. Corruption caused mass unemployment. Corruption turned the education sector into a comatose environment. This enemy is now being tackled by the Buhari administration. Who wants all these evils to come back?

    “To cap the edifice, we testify that we have seen signs that corruption is receiving deadly blows from the Buhari administration and it may eventually die for our great country to survive if we give Buhari the chance to consolidate on the present gains. If it is true that South Africa expelled its corrupt president for the sake of South Africa, Nigeria must retain its incorruptible leader for the sake of Nigeria.”

    Dismissing the call for Buhari’s resignation, Ahmed Raji, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), said Zuma and Buhari’s situations were not the same.

    Unlike Zuma, there have been no allegations of corruption against the person of Buhari, the senior advocate said.

    On the perceived failure to successfully tackle the herdsmen crisis, Raji said insecurity was not enough reason to ask the President to resign.

    Raji said: “President Buhari is different from Zuma. Allegations of corruption were directed at Zuma. Noboby has leveled any allegation of corruption against President Buhari as a person.

    “Even his bitterest enemies concede to him that he’s an honest person. So, I do not think the two situations are the same. I do not think so.

    “And it will be wrong to ask him to resign simply because Zuma has resigned in South Africa. It will be very wrong.”

    On calls for him to resign for failing to fulfill his electoral promises and constitutional responsibilities, Raji said the situation was not enough reason to ask Buhari to throw in the towel.

    “I don’t think those are enough reasons to ask him to resign. It will be carrying it too far to ask him to resign because of insecurity. Resignation is a very weighty thing.

    “It is very delicate to ask the President to resign, and we have to be extremely careful. We cannot ask the President to go the moment there is insecurity in a part of Nigeria.”

    A constitutional lawyer, Ike Ofuokwu, said while there is no doubt about Buhari’s personal integrity, he has massively failed Nigerians and should resign.

    “There was so much expectation of President Buhari. I was one of those who expected so much from him. But if we must be honest with ourselves, he has failed Nigerians.

    “His war against corruption is selective. Herdsmen are killing innocent Nigerians daily. His economic management abilities are poor.

    “Buhari has failed and he does not even need any parliament to ask him to resign. We expect him to humbly resign.”

    On whether Buhari is corrupt, Ofuokwu said: “No. I must be honest. I don’t think that any acts of corruption of can be attributed to him. But for crying out loud, people around him are very corrupt.

    “We saw the Maina-gate, and a man who was suspended for corruption being recalled by him. His anti-corruption stance has no meaning when those surrounding him are so corrupt.”

    An Adamawa-based activist and public affairs commentator Suleiman Baba-Jada, urged Nigerians to render more support to the efforts of President Muhammadu Buhari to tackle corruption and other challenges facing the nation.

    Baba-Jada told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in an interview in Yola that what Buhari needed to tackle the various challenges was support from Nigerians and not insults and unwarranted criticisms.

    Baba-Jada said: “The President needs support instead of inciting criticisms mostly from those who are perceived as corrupt people with cases to answer in EFCC.

    “The whole thing looks more like corruption is fighting back, and that is the more reason why Nigerians must stand up and support the President.

    “The situation we have now, with many people with corrupt cases occupying elected positions means that definitely the fight against corruption won’t be that easy for the president.”

    According to him, the inciting criticisms are meant to distract the president.

    He warned that such people “risk the wrath of the silent majority that are yearning for an end to the menace of corruption and other acts of criminality in the country.”

    Baba-Jada backed the setting up of special courts to try corruption cases, saying it would eliminate the delay being experienced in dispensing of such cases, a situation which has been denting the image of the country.

    “I also want to declare my support for Magu, the EFCC boss, who I believe has good intention and commitment to deliver in his job.”

    The septuagenarian, who spoke on hate speech, cautioned journalists against being used by unpatriotic politicians and ethnic champions to heat up the polity.

    He said: “We are seeing how politicians who lost out in elections or were not given appointment are using the media to insult their perceived enemies in the name of freedom of expression.

    “The media need to be careful from being used to create problems by such politicians and ethnic champions.

    “We are seeing how such politicians who used to be close to Buhari are now attacking everything thing he does in an attempt to settle personal scores just, because they were not given appointments or carried along.

    “Some of them have access to the president but they rather chose to get to him using the media in a combative and derogatory language.”

    He urged Buhari to change his approach to issues “by being more firm and decisive to prove wrong the impression being given by his traducers that he is being controlled by a cabal.”