Tag: JAMB

  • The benevolent JAMB

    The benevolent JAMB

    Oloyede’s NATAP-M Awards, an unsung part of his achievements, is transforming our tertiary institutions

    Tertiary institutions in the country, particularly those that have won the National Tertiary Admissions Performance Merit Award (NATAP-M) Awards before, would forever be grateful to the Professor Ishaq Oloyede-led Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) for its invaluable contribution to the provision of infrastructure on their campuses. The award was instituted by the board in 2018, barely two years after Oloyede assumed office as Registrar/Chief Executive of JAMB in August 2016.

    NATAP-M Award was initiated to recognise tertiary institutions that are complying with admission guidelines, thereby spurring heathy competition among the institutions.

    Many readers would have expected that this piece would follow the usual pattern of regurgitating whatever new developments that have taken place in JAMB in recent times, concerning its core function, the conduct of the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME). This is much more so as the 2024 Policy Meeting of the board that deliberated on matters pertaining to the exams was just held on July 18, at the Hairat Ade Balogun Auditorium, Body of Benchers, Abuja.

    You cannot blame commentators for following this pattern, though. The board has in the last eight years become an institution of one season, one innovation. So, there is always something new to say in that regard. Indeed, given where the board was before Oloyede took over, you cannot but continue to marvel at how he has turned around the fortunes of the place, such that it has become much more functional, rendering billions into the coffers of the Federal Government annually since then. ‘Ko sele ri’ (it never happened in the 38 years of JAMB’s existence before Oloyede came). The board is now 46 years old. Before him, JAMB had always been like the proverbial guinea fowl that laid six eggs and at best hatched only one. An institution that was to be a money spinner for the government became a drain pipe, drawing subvention from government annually to stay afloat.

    What has happened is that beyond, and in spite of these returns to government coffers, Oloyede has also gone some steps further that are praiseworthy. He has ventured into gigantic corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects of sort, instructively to develop institutions that the board feeds with students every year. That, indeed, is the nexus between JAMB and the NATAP-M Award.

    For instance, we have the Radio Console of the University of Ilorin FM bought with part of the N75 million that the university won in the previous award. There was also the case of Ogun State Polytechnic that built an ultra-modern Computer-Based Test centre with the prize money it won as the most compliant polytechnic in admission processes, among several other winners.

    To take JAMB to its present enviable position, Oloyede certainly took some painful decisions. These cut across all stakeholders, including the tertiary institutions, the computer-based test operators, members of the staff of the board itself, the candidates and parents as well as their various other publics.

    Read Also: Foreign mercenaries involved in planned protests, says IGP

    When you wean somebody of something, you replace that thing taken away with something better. Life should not be all about stick; where carrot is required, you don’t hesitate to give it. If people or institutions are punished for breaking the law or subverting the process, then those that scrupulously adhere to them deserve encouragement. For me, this is the nexus between the board and the award.

    The maiden NATAP-M Awards for 2018, which was held in 2019, featured five categories, namely: the most subscribed institutions by candidates; the most-national institution in terms of admission spread and the institution with the highest number of admission of international students. Other categories were: the most-improved institution in intake of female students and the most compliant institution in keeping within the guidelines, rules and regulations of admissions.

    I am interested most in the last; that is the one having to do with compliance with guidelines and rules on admission because this had been a major issue before the advent of Oloyede in JAMB, and we can still see traces of it despite his zero tolerance for abuses related to admissions. Here, what immediately comes into mind is the issue of irregular admissions carried out by some of the institutions in the past. This used to be a sore point until the immediate past Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, gave a deadline for its eradication. Thousands of students who were involved in these would have had their fate hanging in the air but for the minister’s magnanimity. Any institution or candidate that engages in that now that the deadline is over is on its/his/her own.

    This is only one of the anomalies in several institutions. So, if you are punishing non-compliance, I see nothing wrong in rewarding compliance, to incentivise those that have chosen the narrow and straight path.

    These interventions, with the winner-institutions, sometimes alongside the board deciding what they actually need, in tune with their prize money, have been helping in closing the infrastructural gaps in the institutions.

    Of course it is common knowledge that many of our tertiary institutions, particularly the universities, lack vital infrastructural facilities, including lecture theatres, modern science laboratories, state-of-the-art computer centres, among others. We thus have situations where many students literally perch on windows or hang around in some universities to take lectures because lecture halls have not kept pace with the rate of students intake. We have situations where many computer undergraduates, for instance, do more of theory work when they should be more involved in practicals, because of lack of modern facilities.

    Coming from the university system, Oloyede knows where exactly the shoes pinch. He was Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ilorin, his alma mater, for five years. Under him, the university became highly-ranked even in Africa, and the most sought-after university in Nigeria. Oloyede also served as Chairman of the Association of Vice-Chancellors of Nigerian Universities and Committee of Vice-Chancellors between 2011–2012, among several others, including international appointments. You see what I mean?

    However, one question that may agitate the minds of people on the awards is the wide gap between the institution that wins the first position and the others. For instance, with this year’s prize money increased from N710 million to N750 million, the university that came first would get a whopping N500 million. The others, including polytechnics, colleges of education and others, share the balance. The reason is simple: Oloyede explains that this is to enable the winner do something tangible with it. As they say, anything worth doing at all is worth doing well. The idea is to encourage all to strive to be the best, and not play a second fiddle. But then, the overall winner cannot win again until after five years. I think this is fair enough; at least to give others an opportunity to win. It is significant to note that the awards started with N125 million prize money.

    It is also heartwarming that in order to ensure transparency and fairness, the board brought in the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC), among others, to assess the qualified institutions.

    However, my main concern is how JAMB monitors progress on the projects to ensure that the money is judiciously spent so that the projects won’t be victims of the characteristic ‘Nigerian factor’ that would lead to their abandonment or unending contract variations, which would ultimately defeat the purpose of setting up the award. Most of these facilities that JAMB is enabling the institutions to procure through the awards are sorely needed and indeed ought to have been provided as early as yesterday. Subjecting them to further undue delays would be counterproductive.

    But, beyond coming from the university system, one other thing that cannot be discountenanced in the giant strides the board has made under Oloyede is the fact that a round peg has been put in a round hole. It is also what happens when professionalism meets with character. Moreover, he has a cooperative team as well as supportive and understanding bosses.

    This is where I give credit to the Muhammadu Buhari government that appointed him, for taking its eyes to the market when scouting for a helmsman for the board. Dit to the renewal of his mandate when his first term expired, which was a big relief to stakeholders who wished the country’s educational sector well.

    It is significant that despite committing N750 million to the NATAP-M Awards this year, the board was still able to remit over N3.5 billion to the Federal Government coffers, in spite of the economic crisis that the country has been going through. And, despite the fact that it has not increased its fees for application forms! That is to say, where many others are experiencing a casting down, JAMB’s experience has been that of lifting up. This should count for something.

    One other thing that has been working for Oloyede is that he is lucky to have had ministers of education that have shown understanding and have been largely supportive. In the same vein, we have to commend the immediate past Buhari administration again in this regard. Like millions of other Nigerians, I have issues with his government’s performance. But his decision to allow Oloyede Iive his dream for JAMB is highly commendable. I want to believe that Buhari would have been inundated with calls to do something about Oloyede when he began the reform in JAMB, because he must have stepped on many powerful toes of people who have no regard for due process but would rather want to offer admission to their relations and cronies right on their complimentary cards.

    Today, it is not only Nigeria that is benefitting from Oloyede’s reforms in JAMB, his achievements have attracted recognition even from outside our shores.

    We must praise all those who have graciously permitted the JAMB boss an almost unfettered discretion in performing his functions because many people in public office who might have had big dreams when they were appointed had been denied the opportunity of realising them, due to lack of understanding or cooperation from those who appointed them.

    All said, it is important to stress that in all of these approvals to operate or spend, that Prof Oloyede has enjoyed, trust is key. It is possible for the government not to let him come this far if it doesn’t trust him or doesn’t wish him well. Everybody, from the former President Buhari to the incumbent President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, down the line, trust Prof Oloyede. That is why he has been able to come this far. He should not take this for granted.

  • FULL LIST: JAMB releases list of 2024 UTME top scorers

    FULL LIST: JAMB releases list of 2024 UTME top scorers

    The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has released the list of 2024 top scorers of the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME)

    The list was unveiled by the Registrar of JAMB, Prof. Ishaq Oloyede on Thursday, July 18, during the ongoing policy meeting of the Board in Abuja on Thursday.

    Here is a list of 2024 UTME top scorers and their respective states:

    1.⁠ ⁠Olowu David – 367, Ondo state

    2.⁠ ⁠⁠Alayande David – 367, Oyo state

    3.⁠ ⁠⁠Orukpe Joel – 367, Edo

    4.⁠ ⁠⁠Emmanuel Jeremiah -366, Akwa-Ibom

    5.⁠ ⁠⁠Essiet Etini – 365, Akwa-Ibom

    6.⁠ ⁠Ezenwoko Zara – 365, Abia

    7.⁠ ⁠⁠Umoh Joshua – 365, Akwa-Ibom

    8.⁠ ⁠⁠Mamudu Abdulraham – 364, Edo

    9.⁠ ⁠⁠Adeleke Abdulbasit – 363, Kwara

    Read Also: JAMB, heads of institutions adopt 140 as minimum cut-off score for 2023/2024 varsity admissions

    10.⁠ ⁠⁠Echem Victor – 363, Rivers

    11.⁠ ⁠⁠Etute Emmanuel – 363, Edo

    12.⁠ ⁠⁠Jedidiah Chidiebube – 363, Imo

    13.⁠ ⁠⁠Adesanya Oluwatimilehin – 363, Ogun

  • JAMB, heads of institutions adopt 140 as minimum cut-off score for 2023/2024 varsity admissions

    JAMB, heads of institutions adopt 140 as minimum cut-off score for 2023/2024 varsity admissions

    Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) in collaboration with vice-chancellors of universities has adopted 140 as the minimum cut-off score for the 2023/2024 admissions.

    Rectors of Polytechnics and Provosts of Colleges of Education also adopted 100 as the minimum cut-off score for 2023/24 admission.

    Individual institutions are expected to maintain the agreed minimum score for the conduct of their admission.

    They took the decision at the 2024 policy meeting on admission in Abuja on Thursday.

    Read Also: JAMB releases supplementary UTME results

    No tertiary institution is allowed to go below the adopted cut-off marks agreed at the meeting.

    The policy meeting, which has heads of tertiary institutions in the country, and other stakeholders, sets the tone for admissions into tertiary institutions in the country.

    Details shortly…

  • BREAKING: Over one million students admitted illegally – JAMB

    BREAKING: Over one million students admitted illegally – JAMB

    Over one million students were admitted illegally by some tertiary institutions in the country, Registrar, Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB), Prof Is-haq Oloyede has said. 

    Oloyede stated this on Thursday in Abuja at the ongoing policy meeting on 2023/2024 admissions.

    The policy meeting, which has heads of tertiary institutions in the country, and other stakeholders, sets the tone for admissions into tertiary institutions in the country.

    Read Also: BBNaija organisers reduces prize for Season 9

    He said the Board has been able to regularise 600 of the numbers admitted illegally. 

    Oloyede said a lot of the students with illegal admissions don’t have the basic qualifications into the course they registered to study. 

    “Over 1 million students were admitted illegally. We registered about 600 of them because a lot of them don’t have the basic qualifications,” Oloyede said.

    Details Shortly…

  • JAMB releases 2024 supplementary UTME results

    JAMB releases 2024 supplementary UTME results

    The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has released the results of candidates of the supplementary Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME).

    The supplementary UTME was conducted between Friday, June 21st and Saturday, June 22nd, 2024.

    JAMB’s spokesman, Fabian Benjamin, said the supplementary examination was conducted for 28,835 candidates, who were unable to be biometrically verified during the main 2024 UTME and were unable to take their examination.

    Benjamin directed candidates on how to check their results.

    He said: “To check their supplementary UTME results, candidates are to send UTMERESULT to either 55019 or 66019 through the same phone number they had used to generate their profile codes at the start of registration.

    “Similarly, the other category of candidates were those suspected to have been involved in examination malpractices during the main UTME but who were given a second chance to sit the examination.

    “The exercise, which recorded a huge success nationwide, was marked by heightened security measures put in place by the Board to preclude any instance of examination infractions. As such, some nefarious characters, who had attempted to impersonate bona fide candidates were apprehended and handed over to law enforcement agencies for further investigation and prosecution.

    Read Also: JAMB, tertiary institutions fix 2024/2025 admission cut-off marks July 18

    “The Board would continue to ensure that no candidate benefits from any acts of infractions through the deployment of state-of-the-art technology before, during, and after its examinations.

    “Candidates are, therefore, urged, in their own interest, to refrain from engaging in any form of irregularity during their examinations. They are also enjoined to desist from soliciting score upgrades from fraudsters or engage in the mutilation of their result sheets while trying to generate fake result sheets with higher scores.”

  • JAMB, tertiary institutions determine 2024/2025 admission cut-off marks Jul 18

    JAMB, tertiary institutions determine 2024/2025 admission cut-off marks Jul 18

    The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) in collaboration with heads of tertiary institutions or their representatives would on July 18, 2024, determine the cut-off marks for 2024/2025 admissions.

    The policy meeting on admissions into tertiary institutions would be chaired by the Minister of Education, Prof. Tahir Mamman.

    The board said this in its weekly bulletin shared by the head of media for JAMB, Dr. Fabian Benjamin on Monday, June 24.

    The policy meeting on admissions sets the tone for any academic year’s admission exercise, and formulation of admission guidelines.

    It also presents application statistics, candidates’ performance evaluations, and setting the acceptable minimum admission standards for all tertiary institutions across Nigeria for the given year.

    JAMB listed critical stakeholders expected at the meeting to include heads of regulatory agencies such as the National Universities Commission (NUC), National Board for Technical Education (NBTE), National Council for Colleges of Education (NCCE), Heads of tertiary institutions in the country, and the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), among others.

    The statement added: “During the exercise, the Registrar will present reports on the just-concluded Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) and the ongoing Direct Entry (DE) applications while also analysing key performance indicators that could shape the policy directions of the government.

    Read Also: JAMB rules out further extension for DE registration

    “Also, the meeting would apprise stakeholders of the salient issues that cropped up in the course of the previous year’s admission exercise. In addition, the policy meeting would look at the performance of candidates in the current year’s UTME in order to determine the year’s minimum admissible score.

    “It would be recalled that stakeholders had in the previous year agreed on the minimum admission requirement for admission into universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education.

    “Furthermore, the meeting would determine the year’s admission requirements while kick-starting the admission process for the current year; discuss unresolved issues emanating from the previous academic year; and, at the same time, appraise the compliance of stakeholders with extant advisories and suggest further amendments where necessary.”

  • JAMB’s exclusion of pharmacy technicians from Direct Entry

    JAMB’s exclusion of pharmacy technicians from Direct Entry

    Sir: The Reformed Forum of Pharmacy Technicians in Nigeria (RFPTN) strongly urges JAMB to meticulously re-evaluate its stance on the Direct Entry program and reconsider its exclusion of pharmacy technicians.  We firmly believe that these professionals deserve the opportunity to enhance their knowledge and refine their skillset through higher education. RFPTN stands ready and willing to collaborate constructively with JAMB to address any concerns they may harbour and to work collaboratively to establish a streamlined and efficient registration process specifically tailored for our members.

    Despite our unwavering commitment to fostering a collaborative dialogue, our efforts to engage with JAMB on this critical issue have regrettably proven unsuccessful thus far. Our attempts to establish a productive working relationship have been met with a concerning lack of response. RFPTN formally submitted a letter requesting a courtesy meeting with the Registrar of JAMB, proposing a mutually convenient date for a discussion. However, this request was inexplicably disregarded. This lack of responsiveness is disheartening and stands in stark contrast to the collaborative spirit that is necessary to address this issue effectively.

    We are aware that the Pharmacy Council of Nigeria (PCN) has provided assurances regarding their engagement with JAMB with the intention of resolving this matter. However, there is a paucity of evidence indicating any tangible progress from these efforts. It is crucial for JAMB and PCN, both federal government agencies, to cultivate a robust and collaborative working relationship, particularly on matters that directly affect their respective stakeholders. We strongly encourage both agencies to establish a clear and comprehensive understanding of the situation and to work cohesively to arrive at a lasting resolution to this longstanding issue.

    Read Also: NILDS: Nigeria’s Cambridge, Harvard, says Akpabio

    A collaborative effort between these two agencies would not only pave the way for our members to pursue higher education but would also contribute significantly to fostering a more robust and efficient healthcare system within Nigeria. The exclusion of pharmacy technicians from the Direct Entry program is a policy that stands counterproductive to the well-being of the profession and the Nigerian healthcare system at large.

    We, at the RFPTN, strongly believe that fostering a collaborative dialogue with JAMB and the PCN is the most effective pathway to achieving a positive resolution. We are unwavering in our commitment to working together with all stakeholders to ensure that qualified pharmacy technicians are equipped with the knowledge and skills they need to serve the Nigerian healthcare system to the best of their ability.

    •Shagba Humphrey T. President, RFPTN, rfptnig@gmail.com

  • JAMB rules out further extension for DE registration

    JAMB rules out further extension for DE registration

    The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has said that there will be no further extension of 2024 Direct Entry (DE) registration after the June 17, 2024 deadline.

    JAMB spokesperson, Dr. Fabian Benjamin, in a statement on Wednesday, urged candidates to take advantage of the opportunity to register.

    JAMB recently announced the extension period for the 2024 Direct Entry (DE) registration to Monday, June 17, 2024 and approved extra registration points apart from the Professional Registration Centres (PRCs), which are JAMB-owned centres, in Lagos, Kwara, Osun and Osun States.

    Read Also: UTME: JAMB reschedules exam for 24,535 candidates

    The extension of the registration points, according to the Board, was to ensure that every eligible candidate is given the opportunity to realise their dream of registering for the exercise.

    The statement read: “Eligible candidates wishing to register for the 2024 DE are urged to take advantage of this window of opportunity to register as no further extension would be entertained by the Board.

    “The general public is also invited to take note of these extra registration points provided by the Board and the unexpected near zero turnout of prospective DE candidates at these registration facilities as the Board would not listen to any further call for extension when it eventually closes the exercise on Monday, 17th June,2024.”

    The board also said candidates who were scheduled for the 2024 Supplementary UTME are to note that the examination is scheduled to hold between Friday and Saturday, June 21-22, 2024.

    The Board had earlier announced only Saturday, June 22, 2024 for the examination, but now added Friday, June 21, 2024, due to the gracious release of the Friday, June 21 by one of the sister examination bodies.

  • UTME: JAMB reschedules exam for 24,535 candidates

    UTME: JAMB reschedules exam for 24,535 candidates

    • Board releases 3,921 additional results

    The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has given 24,535 candidates who sat for this year’s Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) another opportunity to retake the examination.

    The board said the decision to reschedule the candidates was prompted by substantial non-compliance with its standards in the affected examination centres.

    A statement yesterday in Abuja by JAMB’s spokesman, Dr. Fabian Benjamin, reads: “The board has painstakingly analysed the process and conduct of the 2024 UTME in some centres where there are strong proofs of substantial non-compliance with the board’s standards.

    “Consequently, 24,535 candidates have been rescheduled to retake the examination in their chosen examination towns on Saturday, June 22, 2024.

    “Meanwhile, 3,921 outstanding 2024 UTME results that had been cleared have now been released.

    Read Also: UTME: JAMB reschedules exam for 24,535 candidates

    “Therefore, concerned candidates are urged to check their results from Saturday, June 1, 2024 by sending RESULT to 55019 or 66019 to ascertain their status as those cleared would have their results while those rescheduled would be told that they had been rescheduled.

    “The rescheduled candidates are to print their supplementary Examination Notification Slip from Tuesday, June 4, 2024 to ascertain their designated examination centres.

    “This release brings the total results released to 1,883,350.”

    The statement added: “The rescheduled examination, which is taking place on Saturday, June 22, 2024, two weeks from now, is to give the affected candidates adequate time to prepare for the exercise.

    “This notice does not concern candidates whose results have been released.

    “Candidates with prima facie case(s) of examination misconduct would be further interrogated to establish their culpability after which appropriate measures would be taken on them and announced.”

  • UTME: JAMB reschedules exam for 24,535 candidates

    UTME: JAMB reschedules exam for 24,535 candidates

    …as board releases 3,921 additional UTME results

    About 24,535 candidates who sat for the 2024 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) conducted by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) have been given another opportunity to retake the examination.

    The Board said the decision to reschedule the candidates was prompted by substantial non-compliance with its standards in the affected examination centres.

    The examination will be held on Saturday, June 22, 2024, in towns chosen by the candidates.

    It directed the affected candidates to print their supplementary Examination Notification Slip from Tuesday, 4th June 2024 to ascertain their designated examination centres.

    A statement signed by JAMB’s spokesman, Dr Fabian Benjamin, on Sunday, June 2, said the Board has also released an additional 3,921 withheld UTME results.

    The statement read: “The Board has painstakingly analysed the process and conduct of the 2024 UTME in some centres where there are strong proofs of substantial non-compliance with the Board’s standards.

    “Consequently, 24,535 candidates have been rescheduled to retake the examination in their chosen Examination Towns on Saturday, June 22, 2024.

    “Meanwhile, 3,921 outstanding 2024 UTME results that had been cleared have now been released.

    Read Also: PWDS, CSOs urge Tinubu to appoint Tejuosho as humanitarian minister

    “Therefore, concerned candidates are urged to check their results from Saturday, 1st June 2024 by sending RESULT to 55019 or 66019 to ascertain their status as those cleared would have their results while those rescheduled would be told that they had been rescheduled.

    “The rescheduled candidates are to print their supplementary Examination Notification Slip from Tuesday, 4th June 2024 to ascertain their designated examination centres.

    “This release brings the total results released to 1,883,350.”

    The statement added: “The rescheduled examination, which is taking place on Saturday, 22nd June 2024, two weeks from now, is to give affected candidates adequate time to prepare for the exercise.

    “This notice does not concern candidates whose results have been released.

    “Candidates with prima facie case(s) of examination misconduct, would be further interrogated to establish their culpability after which appropriate measures would be taken on them and announced.”