Tag: Jonathan

  • Jonathan, PDP governors meet over primaries

    Jonathan, PDP governors meet over primaries

    President Goodluck Jonathan on Sunday night met behind closed doors with Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors at the Presidential Vila, Abuja, over forthcoming primaries of the party.

    This was disclosed by some of the state governors, who briefed State House correspondents at the end of the meeting.

    They said the meeting also brainstormed on how to reposition the party to serve Nigerians better.

    Governor Theodore Orji of Abia said; “We discussed our party and the primaries that will soon come. We looked at how to fortify our party to avoid rancour or infighting to enable us do very well both in the primaries and general election in 2015.”

    He said that the reported clash between PDP governors and the party’s national leadership over endorsement of candidates at the state chapters did not come up for discussion.

    According to him, the party’s governorship candidates would emerge through free and transparent primaries contrary to reports of endorsements in the media.

    Governor Ibrahim Shema of Katsina said the meeting evaluated strategies for a successful conduct of the party’s forthcoming primaries.

    At the venue, Adamawa State Governor, Bala Ngilari, described the political atmosphere in the state as stable, stressing that the people were happy with the delivery of justice in his case.

    He said: “The political situation in Adamawa is very stable, I can assure you. The people are very happy. You know, the common man appreciates when justice is done at all times. They are very happy; you can do your independent verification.

    “All the reported noise in some quarters that heavens will fall because of my swearing in, nothing like that has happened. I thank the people of Adamawa for their massive support and we promise to keep faith with them,’’ he said

    According to him, the executive and legislative arms of the state government were not at loggerheads and are working cordially together.

    Among the governors at the meeting were – Olusegun Mimiko (Ondo), Isa Yuguda (Bauchi), Ibrahim Dankwambo (Gombe) and Martin Elechi (Ebonyi).

    Others were – Emmanuel Uduaghan (Delta), Godswill Akpabio (Akwa Ibom), Saidu Dakingari (Kebbi), Liyel Imoke (Cross River), Ibrahim Shema (Katsina), and Umar Garba (Acting Governor of Taraba).

    Also present were – Babangida Aliyu (Niger), Jonah Many (Plateau) and the deputy governors of Kogi and Nasarawa States.

     

  • Why Operation Feed the Nation, Green Revolution failed – Jonathan

    Why Operation Feed the Nation, Green Revolution failed – Jonathan

    President Goodluck Jonathan on Monday explained what stopped the “Operations Feed the Nation” and the “Green Revolution’ ’from making the desired impact on the food production in the country.

    He spoke while flagging off the National Schools Agriculture Programme (NSAP) at the Banquet Hall of the State House, Abuja

    According to him, the “Green Revolution”and Operation Feed the Nation” might have failed because they were not properly articulated.

    He said: “This is not just one of those programmes that we have been having. As a nation, we have had the Green Revolution programme launched, we participated in that. We also had Operation Feed the Nation. But at the end of the day, probably, it was not properly articulated, it just followed the political class and disappeared.

    Noting that the NSAP is aimed at developing a new generation of Nigerian youth agriculture enthusiasts, he said: “This programme is actually to make sure that our students will no longer take agriculture as a form of punishment in schools but they will see agriculture as a business and a way of making money.”

    He said that his administration was intent on making agriculture a very profitable business venture not only to make the nation food sufficient but to also tackle the challenges of youth unemployment.

    Stressing that the NSAP is expected to build a crop of Under-20 Nigerians adequately motivated and trained to live as great agriculture industrialists and enterprenuers, he listed some of Nigeria’s business and industrial moguls like Aliko Dangote and Tony Elumelu who are venturing into agriculture business.

    He said: “We need the Under-20s to link up with the Dangotes, Elumelus and other big Nigerian entrepreneurs. This is part of our strategy to tackle youth unemployment. We are developing agriculture Super Eagles.”

    He promised to meet once a year at an agriculture stakeholders’ conference with participants of the NSAP programmes who will be drawn from several schools across the country.

     

     

  • 2015: Jonathan, PDP face tough task in Southeast, Southsouth

    2015: Jonathan, PDP face tough task in Southeast, Southsouth

    Contrary to the assumption of an easy ride for President Goodluck Jonathan and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2015 eletions, they may face some challenges in the Southeast and Southsouth.

    Some angry stakeholders in the zones are threatening protest votes if the party’s primaries were not transparent to allow the people’s will to prevail.

    One of the Southsouth governors has threatened to ask his favoured senatorial candidate to defect to the All Progressives Congress (APC) to unseat a two-term senator.

    The development is said to be of concern to the PDP leadership.

    Investigation by our correspondent showed that the PDP is at a crossroads in eight states following attempts by some governors to impose governorship candidates on the party.

    A high-ranking PDP leader, who spoke in confidence, said: “We are having serious challenges in some states in the Southeast and Southsouth. The consensus option is being resisted in about eight states.

    “Some of the aspirants are already threatening to defect to APC or work against the interest of the party.

    “We have a case where a governor is threatening to work against the interest of the party. We may lose some states in the Southeast and Southsouth unless we are circumspect.

    “I can assure you that the President and PDP leaders will try to resolve the crisis.”

    A member of the NWC said: “We have already opened discussions with some of the affected governors in order to put the success of the party above any other consideration.

    “What you call problems or challenges are not limited to the PDP. We will sort things out in a ‘family manner’ to avoid going for the 2015 poll divided.”

    Some of the governors facing tough tasks in anointing their successors are: Emmanuel Uduaghan (Delta), Godswill Akpabio (Akwa Ibom), Sullivan Chime (Enugu) and Theodore Orji (Abia).

    In Rivers and Imo states, the battle for the governorship slots is tearing the PDP apart.

    While the crisis of confidence in Rivers State is between former Minister Nyesom Wike and some stakeholders, the struggle for the ticket in Imo has pitched former Governor Ikedi Ohakim against Senator Ifeanyi Araraume and House of Representatives Deputy Speaker Emeka Ihedioha.

    The case at hand in Enugu State has pitched Governor Sullivan Chime against stakeholders.

    In Delta State, favoured candidate, Tony Obuh, is facing a battle from Ovie Omo-Agege, Ndudi Elumelu and Ngozi Olojeme.

    But the issue in Delta is the opposition to the zoning of the governorship slot.

    A source said: “As the PDP gears up to retain the Presidency and the governorship in Delta State, the party leadership needs to be conscious of a startling fact: In 2011, elections in Delta Central alone accounted for about 60 and 50 per cent of votes in the presidential and governorship elections.

    “Zoning in Delta State has been an issue of concern among the stakeholders. Even though Delta North keeps pushing, it remains the only zone that is yet to produce a governor. Delta Central and Delta South are saying the zoning formula does not come to play as far as the 2015 elections are concerned.

    “Many analysts believe President Goodluck Jonathan faces a tough reelection battle with the emergence of the All Progressives Party (APC), which is threatening PDP’s  hold on the central government.

    “In 2011, voter turnout in the Southeast and Southsouth was 65.8 per cent and 67.96 per cent. If Jonathan and the party must hold on to power, there must be an increase in voter turnout in the 2015 presidential election in these geopolitical zones…”

  • Gowon truly committed to one Nigeria, says Jonathan

    Gowon truly committed to one Nigeria, says Jonathan

    President Goodluck Jonathan has said former Head of State, Gen. Yakubu Gowon, is truly committed to a united Nigeria.

    The President spoke yesterday at Gowon’s 80th birthday thanksgiving service at the National Christian Centre in Abuja.

    Dignitaries at the occasion included the Senate President David Mark; former Vice-President Alex Ekwueme; former Army Chief, Gen. T. Y. Danjuma; former Chief of General Staff, Gen. Oladipo Diya; former Minister of Information, Prof. Jerry Gana; Ondo and Plateau State Governors Olusegun Mimiko and Jonah Jang.

    Also there were the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun; Ijaw leader Chief Edwn Clark; some members of the Jonathan cabinet and other top government officials.

    The President noted that Gowon, even with his federal might during the 1967-1970 civil war, did not see the Biafran side as a side that should be crushed but was more saddled with how to keep Nigeria one.

    Jonathan said: “He (Gowon) was not bent on defeating an opponent but how to keep the country one. He is totally committed to keeping Nigeria one, even after his life in the military.”

    The President said Gowon should be honoured, adding that the former Head of State is a good example of an elder statesman who is more committed to leaving a better Nigeria for generations yet unborn.

    He said Gowon had been working with every government and never failed to attend the Council of State meeting, except when it was inevitable.

    Delivering a sermon, titled: God Keeps His Promises, the Archbishop of Jos, Dr. Ben Kwashi, likened the life of Gen. Gowon to the time of Joel in the Bible, adding that he did not disassociate himself from the troubles of his time.

    The cleric said God had never and would never punish the righteous but would always judge and punish the wicked.

  • Jonathan condoles with CAN over member’s death

    Jonathan condoles with CAN over member’s death

    President Goodluck Jonathan has received news of the death of the founder and General Overseer of Greater Evangelism World Crusade Ministries International, Apostle Geoffrey Dabibi Numbere.

    On behalf of his family and the Federal Government, the President extended his heartfelt condolences to Apostle Numbere’s wife, Mrs. Nonyem Numbere, his children, relatives and members of the church.

    He also commiserated with the leadership of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and the people of Rivers State on the death of the cleric.

    Dr Jonathan joined them in mourning the spiritual leader and former CAN Chairman in the Southsouth, adding that his impact on the moral and social development of millions of Nigerians and non-Nigerians would be greatly missed.

  • Balewa’s son: Jonathan’s consensus shameful

    Balewa’s son: Jonathan’s consensus shameful

    Mr. Abduljalil Tafawa Balewa, son of the late Prime Minister, Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, has said the Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP’s) endorsement of President Goodluck Jonathan as its consensus candidate is shameful.

    He said those who agreed to make the President a consensus candidate were people  trying  to escape the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) hammer or governors trying to secure seats in the Senate.

    Tafawa Balewa said though he is the strong member of the PDP, he would not support the consensus because Nigeria is not a communist nation and the PDP a non-communist party.

    The politician addressed reporters at the weekend in Abuja, where he said that he was not engaging in anti-party activity for rejecting consensus and declaring his bid to run for the Presidency under the PDP.

    He said: “The consensus was taken very shamefully. We used to blame the All Progressives Congress (APC) or the constituent parties that made up the APC, that they don’t have internal democracy. They would just choose someone and say this is the next person; that we had internal democracy.

    “If you look at some of these people who gave the consensus, they all have loads of baggage behind them. On the same day, you would read in the newspaper that they had been given a pass that EFCC would not touch them and the governors would be able to get senatorial seats. So, all of these people are saving their butts. It isn’t out of love. But we will not make it easy for them to go outside of the democratic principles. I am contesting.

    “Choosing a consensus candidate for the party is not in the constitution of the party. I have been a member of this party since 1998 in the United States. We started the PDP. I remain a viable member and my rejection of the consensus is not being anti-party. We are not a communist nation. This is not a communist party. It is a democratic party and the name of the party is the PDP. It will remain that way. Even if these lily-livered people continue to carry out shenanigans, we will not allow it.

    “I love this country with all my heart and I cannot watch this country dive into an abyss. I can rescue it. I will rescue it; I am going to rescue it. I think that the Seven-Point Agenda by (the late President Umaru) Yar’Adua was a little too much. It was okay and doing something on a time line basis with the Transformation Agenda, I ask: What are we transforming? That’s because I can’t seem to go past the present continuous tense of the word ‘transform’; I don’t know what to transform. It is not moving where it should move.”

    He added: “I am in the race because I am a Nigerian. I am in the race because I don’t think Nigeria is going in the right direction. We need to turn the ship of state around and reposition it to where it should be heading.

    “That the NEC or whatever mnemonic you want to use has endorsed him (Jonathan); that is fine. I hope that when the time comes, they will vote for him. I am appealing to all Nigerians and I am putting my wares out to know that I can do a heck of a lot better than we have now.

    “Nigeria cannot afford to move at this snail pace because Nigeria is lagging behind in every area for a country this old and a nation this large. We are lagging in everything.”

  • ‘Jonathan’ll lose in Ondo’

    ‘Jonathan’ll lose in Ondo’

    A former chieftain of the defunct National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) in Ondo State, Bayo Sadibo, at the weekend said President Goodluck Jonathan would lose in the state.

    He said this was due to the waning popularity of Governor Olusegun Mimiko.

    Sadibo, who is the national coordinator of the Social Democratic Movement (SDM) a non-partisan organisation, described Jonathan as a good man.

    He warned the President against promoting “failed politicians and political degenerates” from the Southwest because they would not help him to win elections in the zone.

    Sadibo said Mimiko joined the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to avoid disgrace.

    “Mimiko has the right to join any party. But because of the Labour Party’s (LP) dwindling fortunes in Ondo State, he quickly joined the PDP to avoid impeachment.

    “Let me tell you, his defection has “ebolarised” PDP and the party’s fortunes have dwindled. Before his defection, PDP was enjoying some measure of acceptability with the people of Ondo State. Because of him, Jonathan can never win in Ondo State.”

  • Bash Ali to Jonathan: save my vision

    Bash Ali to Jonathan: save my vision

    Nine months after the inauguration of the 17-man Local Organising Committee (LOC) for the Bash Ali Boxing Project, the World Boxing Federation cruiser weight champion has urged President Goodluck Jonathan  to allow his world title bout to be staged in Nigeria.

    In an open letter to the President, Ali lamented that since the setting up of the LOC, the committee has spent over N50 million on logistics.

    He said if the approved $1 million fee was not paid to the International Boxing Union (IBU) by October 31, Nigeria would lose the right to host the event as well as the profit that would have come from TV rights.

    Ali, 58, said the first LOC for the bout was constituted in 2006 to coordinate funding to host the first Guinness World Record fight to be staged in Africa, but this did not materialise.

    He said despite several meetings with officials of the National Sports Commission (NSC) to execute the project, his efforts were frustrated by the attitude of the officials.

    Urging the President not to allow his dream of inscribing Nigeria’s name in the annals of history to fizzle out, Ali said nine months after the inauguration and several meetings with some key bank officials, there was nothing to show for it.

    He said a bank official was demanding $10 mil1ion from the $30 million fight purse and $100 million cut from the pay per view (PPV) TV profit to make happy some government officials, who are angry that with me.

    Ali said: “The IBU has offered me 15 million euro to fight in Germany but I will not allow bad and corrupt government officials to drive me away and kill my dream for a better Nigeria.”

    Ali urged President Jonathan to pay the required fee and appoint a representative to take charge of the fight purse and the PPV TV profit.

  • How the girls haunted Jonathan

    How the girls haunted Jonathan

    This columnist cried to the rafters after the Chibok girls were whisked away by the bandits in the name of God. I titled the piece, Swap the Girls Now, on May 19, 2014, and not a few thought it a heresy.

    The presidency forswore dining with the enemy, which was what the whole idea was interpreted to be. Now, they want to exult that they have actually dined with the damnable foes and are on the verge of releasing the girls after six months in captivity. But is this an act of heroism or desperation by the Jonathan administration?

    When the tragedy first occurred, the Jonathan administration did not accept it. They asked questions rather than provide answers. Some of them asked, how was it possible that hundreds of girls could be abducted in a convoy and no one stopped them? So they said it could not be true. The enemies of Jonathan were at work again. They did not wish him well. Even the president went live on national television asking the parents of the abducted to provide the names of the students. His wife categorically said the girls were not missing. That was the first scene of the drama. It was the stage of denial.

    Later the same administration knew that it had happened. It started to tell the country that it knew what was going on. It was the work of the opposition party, the APC. When Oby Ezekwesili rallied the young and the old behind her #Bring Back the Girls movement, they accused her of working with the opposition party. They wanted to rally Nigerians behind Jonathan’s innocence. He is an innocent man. He provided the soldiers. He declared emergency. What else could he have done? The APC should leave Jonathan alone. They put the point as nakedly as they could. This became worse when CNN flew into the country, and reported day by day the updates of the events. Doyin Okupe said to the nation on CNN about the Nigerian military being on the trail of the militants with aircraft and tanks, etc. We never saw any result. It was the stage of propaganda.

    When propaganda did not work, they saw that the whole of the world focused on us. John McCain, senator and former presidential candidate in the United States, lambasted our bumbling military and leaders. Ditto Hilary Clinton. We heard nothing but silence from the vaults of the presidency. They wanted to divert attention from what was going on in the country. They wanted to see if it was possible to scale the acceptability of the president against the narrative of the missing girls. So, they orchestrated a new campaign called Bring Back Jonathan. It back fired. It was the desecration of the innocence of an idea. Like crude oil spilling on pristine waters, it was a dangerous gamble. They also made surreptitious moves on the media to play it down. But three newspapers, inspired by The Nation, began a permanent column on the front page, urging the federal government to bring back the girls. They had no answer. They sulked. They demurred. They cowered. It was the depression stage.

    Not long after, Malala, the now winner of the Nobel Prize for Peace, came calling. They had no choice but to allow the relations of the missing girls to visit Aso Rock. It was a grudging concession. The humiliation was colossal. It took a teenager to wake them out of their supercilious torpor. The president had called off, in official cowardice, a trip to the village to show solidarity. Now, in a torpedo of the African tradition of visiting the bereaved, it was the bereaved that visited the condoler, and what condoler! This was the end of denial. They no longer could say, even to themselves, that it was a politically motivated kidnap.

    Again, the matter had begun to sour. The matter became intractable. More and more people died from the bullets of the godless bandits. Territories fell, Boko Haram flags flew defiantly, video clips proclaimed the rhetoric bluster of their leader, pictures from the northeast bled with gore and streamed with tears, soldiers mutinied, their wives blighted the streets with protests. What the Jonathan administration thought would go away became a monstrous albatross.

    It became difficult to blame the opposition, although there was some level of gloating from the APC that it was Jonathan’s cross. But Jonathan is leader and leaders take responsibility. From depression, they descended to a place of ambiguity. They had no answers. The imagination was empty of rhetoric. Ezekwesili and her followers drummed up the campaign. Although CNN and the international media had moved elsewhere, Nigeria was still on the radar. The conversation never ceased. It was like a low burning flame that never petered out, stubborn, illuminating, spreading, lapping up more victims of leaves and dry paper. The big house, with its big kerosene tank, is threatened.

    Then the inner sanctum of the regime started worrying. Not because the girls were not released. But because the TAN campaigns were revving up and it was getting close for Jonathan to unfurl his ambition. He will not have “I have no shoes” kind of mantra to latch on to. Rather the Chibok girls will stick to him like what we in the Niger Delta call jiga, that little worm that hid under toes of shoeless boys playing around rivers and ponds. He did not want that. They – he and his team – had to get this Chibok nonsense out of the way. They moved into the desperation phase.

    That explains why he eventually dined with the enemy. Remember that picture of him with Ali Modu Sheriff with Chad leader? That was part of the deal. Hypocrisy is the hallmark of the desperate. He can don any identity in order to get things done. Why did he not say, well, Modu knows a thing or two about this matter, and we can parley with him so we can get the girls out? Rather his party called APC Boko Haram party when Modu was an APC man. But when he became a PDP man, Olisa Metu and presidency votaries lost their tongue, only to regain it in chatting with him on the Chibok girls.

    So, are we to thank Jonathan if the girls actually come out? Or he will thank himself for having taken an albatross out of the way of his ambition. It is what we can call a gift horse in the mouth. A cynical boost of goodwill. He would not release the girls if not because his campaign is about to take off. It is an act of selfishness. It reminds me of Lord Byron’s lines in his Ode to Napoleon Bonaparte, “He had no objection to true liberty except that it would make the nations free.” Jonathan was less interested in the Chibok girls’ freedom than the freedom for him to campaign for the second term.

  • Jonathan, Malala and the loud silence in Chibok

    Jonathan, Malala and the loud silence in Chibok

    IT is exactly 187 days since the Boko Haram insurgents abducted over 200 girls in a secondary school in Chibok, Borno State. Since then, it has been one farcical tale after the other as close relatives of the abducted girls chew their pain. Six months into the tragic tale, no one can say for sure if the girls would ever reunite with their families. Right in our faces, 217 girls just vanished. At the height of the bringbackourgirls protest, the authorities gave us a glimmer of hope. They said rescue efforts were ongoing and confirmed ‘sighting’ the girls. Three months after the little Pakistani girl-child activist and 2014 Nobel Peace Prize Winner, Malala Yousafzai, invaded the almostdead conscience of the leadership, that hope painfully pales into hopelessness.

    It is sad that those who have chosen to put their integrity on the line in a determined effort to nudge the government into action in a strident cry to free the girls have become the butt of atrocious abuse and blackmail by the bootlickers in power. It was so bad that a serving Minister, who has not added any value to the ministry she superintends since taking the oath of office, would be the one to confront Mrs. Oby Ezekwesili with the warped fallacies of how the nation’s education system crumbled! Well, in times like this, it is not uncommon for people to twist the tale to wag a tail. Even at that, could that be enough justification for the government’s impotence and seeming unwillingness to rescue the innocent girls from their bloody captors? As days run into months, the tragic realities of what the abduction portends for a nation still living in denial of the incompetence of its leadership tugs the soul.

    And then, I ask: what has changed since that Malala visit to Aso Villa? Have they brought back the girls? No. Has the failure to rescue the girls affected the do-or-die politics in which some persons are falling over one another, begging a ‘reluctant’ President Goodluck Jonathan to throw his hat in the ring and contest the 2015 general elections? No. Is there any evidence to show that any of the parties, including the opposition, has unveiled a convincing policy directive on the best way to tackle insurgency beyond the meaningless patter and exchange of brickbats in safe havens? No. Nothing has really changed. There is little to cheer about beyond the fact that, three months after her visit, Malala is now, deservedly so, a Nobel Peace Prize winner. It was nice hearing her reminding the world about the need to return the Chibok 217 to their homes. It was, to say the least, humbling that that feeling resonated across the world on the 180th day of the tragic tale in Nigeria. And so, as Chibok echoes in loud silence across the globe through the resolve of some people to fight the battle for this forgotten community, one can only encourage them to continue to cling on to hope amid this darkling plain. Yet, I cannot but remember how Malala rekindled hope in July when she took the battle to the doorstep of the authorities. No doubt, without the persistence of the Oby Ezekwesililed group and the challenge thrown by Malala, the Chibok story could have become another casualty of our ever-burgeoning dustbin of history by now. Malala it was who reawakened the dead conscience of those who remained insensitive and utterly indifferent to the plight of the Chibok 217. In a piece titled “Malala’s ‘bulala’ and a President’s koboko” published on July 19, I had painted a scenario in which “our ever-busy Very Important Personalities were grovelling to share the moment with the 17-year-old strong-willed girl who has given a whole new meaning to hope amid the suffocating misery in our country. No doubt, Malala’s inspiring story and her presence in Nigeria on her 17th birthday to push for a more humane interest in the plight of the Chibok girls couldn’t have come at a better time. Her outspokenness, candour, courage and determination to soldier on despite a failed attempt to cut short her life should rekindle hope in a society that has almost sacrificed the abduction saga on the altar of political shenanigans.”

    Today, that shambolic approach to an issue that has attracted international attention persists. It bothers me that there exist in our midst today persons who believe that the Chibok story is one successful tele-novella made real by the ‘political enemies’ of the President. It is also to our collective shame that some sponsored groups became tools in the hands of government and they tried all they could to put an end to whatever the bringbackourgirls group was trying to achieve. Twice, this same force has rebuffed attempts by the group to interface with their President on the way forward. Instead of seeing the bigger picture, they chose to fight dirty in desperation to hide the truth. What did they do when Malala questioned our humanity as a people? How did they react to the hot truth she pumped into some dead ears? Nothing! All they did was to recoil in shame, giggling through the soul-searching words the young lady spewed. Malala’s outburst, I wrote then, was one “body-piercing whiplash that the presidency absorbed with shocking equanimity. Just picture a scenario where a toddler was chastising adults for failing to live up to the expectations of a doddering infant!”

    Her words: “One important thing about today was my meeting with the President, Mr Goodluck Jonathan. I met him today and I told him that I hear the voices of my sisters. I’m representing my sisters and their parents today and if you are the elected President, you need to fulfil your responsibilities and your responsibility is to listen to your people, who are saying bring back our girls. Luckily, the President assured me of two things. He promised that the government will chose the best option to bring back the girls alive and safe. And the second promise he made, which is very important, is that he will meet with the parents of those girls that are abducted and I’m hoping that he will fulfil it. I’m hopeful that the President will meet you soon because he made the promise to me and to you Nigerians.”

    As I write this, one thing rankles. The government has not relented in blowing hot and cold over whatever it was doing to save the parents, the girls and concerned Nigerians from the misery. We just flow with the wind while the world waits for us to take action. Aside the occasional outcry in Abuja, all we have heard from Chibok in the last few months after the visit to Aso Villa is a worrisome loud silence. The last time our President spoke on it, he told a gathering of world leaders at the United Nations that he was determined to reunite the girls with their families as soon as feasible. That is the only thing we can hold on to as another day passes by with no news of the girls. 180 days after that sacrilege in Chibok, we are standing here, holding firmly to hope. That’s the only thing that keeps us going in this season of wonky legs.