Tag: Jonathan

  • Re: Ndigbo and Jonathan

    SIR: I refer to comments published at page 21 of The Nation of Friday, September 26, written by C. Don Adinuba, wherein he wondered about the illogical, blind and uncommon support by Ndigbo to Goodluck Jonathan without reciprocal return by Jonathan and his brothers to Ndigbo.

    I wholly adopt the said write up by Adinuba and by way of amplification, I add that how can Jonathan take Ndigbo and their leaders seriously when leaders like Peter Obi, Sullivan Chime, T.A. Orji, Orji Uzor Kalu and others are outdoing each other in their struggle to mount canopies and beg Jonathan to run in 2015?

    When Jonathan finally accepts to run, who then will he go to in Igbo land to beg for votes and made to pledge what he will do for Ndigbo in return?

    It has not bothered these so-called Igbo leaders that except the civil war, the only thing Ndigbo did with one mind, in totality, commitment and as a block was voting for Jonathan in 2011.The percentage of votes Ndigbo gave to Jonathan in 2011, they have never given to any Igbo man either dead or alive. Not even the Great Zik of Africa or Dim Odimegwu Ojukwu. Yet, what do we have in return?

    Aba – Ikot- Ekpene (Federal Road) has been completely closed for three years now. Umuahia – Ikot – Ekpene road is as good as condemned. The Enugu- Port Harcourt Express road is today a death trap; ditto for Enugu- Onitsha Express road – condemned.

    Aside the general epileptic power supply situation, what about the abandonment of Isi- Ala-Ngwa dry port approved by former President Obasanjo?

    All travellers who used Port Harcourt-Enugu Express road who got near Osisioma portion of the road on Friday September 26, slept at Osisioma Junction because of the terrible state of the road yet, Ndigbo are supporting Jonathan blindly.

    The systematic neglect of all federal roads in Igbo land is deliberate by the Jonathan’s administration as an extension of abandoned property policy to frustrate the economic growth of Ndigbo which is predominantly based on movement of persons and goods in and out of Igbo land. When nobody comes into Igbo land to buy our goods, how then will Igbo land develop? When there are so access roads into Igbo land, who will invest there?

    The so-called Igbo leaders are only concerned about their stomach infrastructure rather than developmental projects that will open Ala- Igbo for an in-look from the outside world.

    • Victor C.Nwaugo. Esq.

    174 Hospital Road, Aba.

  • That PDP offer of first refusal to Jonathan

    That PDP offer of first refusal to Jonathan

    SIR: As a prelude to the 2015 general elections, the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, offered what they call an offer of first refusal to President Goodluck Jonathan to fly the party’s flag in the forthcoming Presidential election. This means that the party has endorsed President Jonathan as its candidate and other aspirants will only contest the primaries and vie for the ticket if he rejects the offer.

    For the past two years or so it would have been clear to any keen observer of Nigerian politics that President Goodluck Jonathan has not had any serious challenger to the office. Aside from that fact, when has any executive incumbent in Nigeria either at the federal or state level lost a re-election bid at the primaries?

    In 1983 the National Party of Nigeria, NPN did not make Shehu Shagari an offer of first refusal yet he was re-elected to the Presidency.  In 2003 despite the near-miss that President Obasanjo suffered in the hands of his deputy and power broker Atiku Abubakar, he was still not offered a right of first refusal to the Presidency.

    That this lexicon is gradually creeping into our political dictionary even when it has existed with us in an unorthodox manner as the “power of incumbency” shows that something is wrong and spin doctors are making a hell of an effort to justify it.

    They are so quick to point out that it also exits in United States of America from where we copied our presidential system of government but that is where the comparison ends. Those that make the unnecessary comparison however forget to tell Nigerians that the offer in the US is always tied to landmark achievements and performance.  Thomas Jefferson who was the first American President to be made that offer in 1805 was because of the landmark achievement of acquiring the massive Louisiana territory in 1803 from France thereby almost doubling American land mass as it was then. Several other American Presidents have been made that offer on the strength of their solid achievements and performance in office.

    To what then does President Jonathan merit this offer? Is it because Nigerian undergraduates stayed at home for more than six months because his government reneged on the agreement it made with university teachers some years ago? Is it because public hospitals were shut in Nigeria for more than two months  on account of a strike action by medical doctors as a result of an unfulfilled agreement on the part of the government?

    Is PDP making President Jonathan the offer on the grounds that Nigeria is the biggest economy in Africa where there is no stable power supply or where hunger is rising even as the economy is growing?

    The offer of first refusal did not even just come ordinary. It came with a baggage full of dirt and insult to the sensibilities of Nigerians. As part of the offer, all the first term PDP governors are to be returned unopposed whether the governor performed well or not; all serving PDP governors who aspire to go to Senate will be returned unopposed; the Senate President David Mark will have a jolly ride back to the Senate and all sorts of compromises at the expense of the ordinary Nigerian whose future is tied to an elite that conspires and consolidates for its own selfish interests.

    Why are we so blessed in copying the wrong things and leaving out the good ones?

    The efforts dissipated by the party and presidential image makers should better be channeled to more creative endeavours instead of trying to hoodwink Nigerians. Nigerians know better and will have their day in the polling booths come next year. It is for the party to make an offer of first refusal to anybody but the person will have to contend with Nigerians come February next year.

     

    • Chukwuma Okoro,

    Abule Oshun, Lagos

  • The big sell: Jonathan versus Buhari

    With President Goodluck Jonathan’s endorsement for a second term by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the 2015 presidential election in Nigeria is shaping up to be a marketing contest. It promises to be a time when creative framing of the contest will be decisive.  And  with barely five months to the February 14, 2015 presidential election, it is apt to do a comparative analysis of how  sellable are the two front runners, in the race – incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan of the PDP and Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress ( APC).

    President Jonathan has two major advantages over any other opponent – name recognition and the power of incumbency which affords him the leverage to create dramatic events and make policy decisions which can advance his chances at the polls. If, for instance, he musters the courage to further reduce fuel price, induce accelerated trial and eventual jailing of fuel subsidy scammers, sack police commissioners in states where kidnapping has become thriving business, and get the army to take the fight to the Boko Haram insurgents, he can fairly blunt his perception as a fumbling, ‘clueless’ anti-people leader who gives no damn about the suffering of the masses. It can also begin to indicate that he has not been in consort with, or a patron saint of, the corrupt oligarchy. The poser is: Can he?

    Of course, no leader at the level of the Presidency will not have ‘achievements’ to celebrate. The task for Jonathan’s marketing agents – and we have a plethora of them with the rambunctious Transformation Ambassadors of Nigeria (TAN) taking the cake – is itemizing those populist programmes and projects which have transformed the peoples’ lives. Statistics don’t sell with the masses; what are those Jonathan policy measures which touch lives of citizens, directly. What are the tangibles?

    However, one achievement President Jonathan can rightly boast of is being a democrat, allowing the people’s will to prevail in elections, by citing the governorship elections  in Edo, Ondo, Anambra, Ekiti states  and most recently Osun, the so-called militarisation of the process in the last two states notwithstanding. Also, there is, to some extent, the perception of President Jonathan as being tolerant of criticisms going by the stridency of some of his critics, which occasionally degenerate to name calling, with some columnists tagging him as ‘clueless’ and a serpent.

    Our president says he is not a Pharaoh or a General and projects as your regular, unpretentious village boy. Let no one be deceived. It is becoming obvious that behind his manufactured humble mien lurk a strong willed streak and a cunning which neutralize opposition without being seen as a demolishing Leviathan, a bulldozer. You remember that General turned-farmer, who became a two-term president and brashly showed us he was a Power Hurricane?  The Otueke village boy has quietly humbled him without a fuss.  Just as he has neutralized those vociferous Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) grandstanders most of whom are yesterday’s men seeking relevance in today’s politics. The saturation campaign of Jonathan’s foot soldiers, nationwide, has had the effect of intimidating potential challengers in his party, the PDP, thus leading to his unanimous adoption as party presidential candidate. The continuing saturation awareness campaign strategy is also intended to numb the people to feel there is no effective, alternative choice in the opposition to his candidacy. Those not sold on Candidate Jonathan may choose not to vote, but then even a 30 percent voter turnout does not invalidate the election.  It is a situation where voter apathy may work to Jonathan’s advantage. After all, is democracy not turning into a rule of the minority?

    Now to General Muhammadu Buhari. How do we place this General in terms of electoral permutation and marketing?

    Buhari, in terms of name recognition, personal integrity and consistency is the most sellable candidate for the APC.  But a Buhari presidential bid suffers two major setbacks – that of limited time to project him as well as frame the campaign issues and an apparent funding limitation. The procrastination of his party, the APC, in projecting him as the putative candidate, has not helped matters, thus allowing all kinds of political opportunists to jostle for the party’s presidential ticket under a nebulous internal democracy mantra.  It is turning out a chaotic terrain, especially with some party leaders and APC sympathetic columnists articulating weird presidential ticket permutations, including that of a Speaker Aminu Tambuwal, a PDP stalwart, as the party’s presidential candidate, if he defects. It does not get more desperate and befuddled!

    There is also an unexplainable lethargy in APC awareness campaign nationwide. As noted by Tatalo Alamu in his Snooper column in The Nation of Sunday of August 31, “like an overweight sprinter, the APC has been slow to get off the starting block”.  It is rather ludicrous seeing APC’s spokesmen whining that Jonathan’s foot soldiers shouldn’t be on the campaign trail. Who is stopping APC following suit?  It would appear the Buhari strategists suffer the same lethargy, like the party, in getting a Buhari saturation awareness campaign off the block. It ignores two realities – that a presidential election is a marathon, not a 100 meters dash and that at presidential election level, the candidate, not the party, is the focal point. That is why it is now more of selling the candidate, his persona, his credibility.

    The main advantage and attraction of a Buhari candidacy, and putative Presidency, is his perception as an incorruptible person who can be trusted to confront the cancer of corruption that is ravaging the country, head on. It is the one issue which, properly articulated, and coupled with that of insecurity, can determine the presidential election outcome in Buhari’s favour. This is where framing the election issue becomes crucial. Two American presidential elections were determined, basically, on just one issue each – weak  leadership  in the Carter- Reagan  1980 election, and insecurity/crime in the Bush versus Dukakis election in 1988. I covered both election campaigns, live. The Chibok girls’ abduction by Boko Haram insurgents is a scene reminiscent of Iranian militants holding Americans hostage at the U.S Embassy in Teheran in 1979 for several months up to Election Day in November 1980 which projected President Jimmy Carter to the American people as a weak leader who cannot assert American power to free the hostages. Then Governor Ronald Reagan, who had vowed to confront the Iranians with the American might, whatever it takes, won the election in a landslide, Carter winning only in two of the 50 states – his native Georgia and Minnesota, the state of his running mate, Walter Mondale.

    In the 1988 electoral battle between Vice President George H.W. Bush (Republican) and the Governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis (Democrat), the Bush campaign turned the table on front runner Dukakis by projecting him as soft on crime and liberal with criminals, exemplifying this with Dukakis’ granting of parole to a jailed rapist, Willie Horton, in Massachusetts only for the convict to go to Maryland state to commit another rape. Although Dukakis engineered economic renewal of Massachusetts state, and promised similar economic miracle nationwide, the Bush campaign framed the election as a security/crime issue and vigorously projected a crime-ridden America under a Dukakis Presidency which persuaded the American people to vote for security, thus ending the presidential hopes of Dukakis. It was a classic example of campaign issue framing.

    Both candidates Jonathan and Buhari carry some baggage.  Given Nigeria’s state of insecurity and rampant corruption, which are generally seen to have worsened under Jonathan’s watch, President Jonathan’s re-election becomes a hard sell to the Nigerian electorate, while the perception of Buhari, in some quarters, as a religious fanatic and northern irredentist are burdens he would need to discharge. Buhari also suffers the additional disadvantage of limited campaign penetration, which can, however, be mitigated if creative campaigning is applied in the time available.  Ultimately, two factors will be decisive in the 2015 presidential election– voter turnout and perception management.  In the 2011 presidential election, 38.2 million people voted as against 66.8 million registered voters, representing about 55 percent voter turnout.  The party that can mobilise more of its supporters to cast their ballots will be at an advantage. On perception management, a projection of President Jonathan as a seemingly ‘harmless’ person who flows with the tide may attract a ‘let him be’ vote for a second term from an indulgent electorate while a vigorous marketing of Buhari as a selfless patriot, the liberator from the bondage of corruption and insecurity could persuade the voters to cast their ballots for the ascetic General. It is a potential cliff hanger. However, given the imponderables of politics, anything can happen, between now and the February 14, 2015 vote, to change the calculations.

     

    • Dr. Olawunmi, teaches Mass Communication at Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State.

  • Jonathan, Sambo and the 2015 ticket

    With all the organs of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) declaring President Goodluck Jonathan the sole Presidential candidate of  the party for the 2015 general elections, the decision to pick his running mate is said to be the exclusive right of  the President.

    The sole candidacy declared for Jonathan was said to only cover him and not his Vice, Namadi Sambo.

    For this reason, many politicians interested in the number two job have continued to make clandestine moves to lobby for the post.

    Many of them are believed to be scheming to take charge in 2019 when Jonathan’s tenure will elapse should he get another term in 2015.

    Some of them have begun testing the waters with posters flooding Abuja and many parts of the country showing them as probable running mates to President Jonathan.

    A case in point is the poster showing the PDP National Chairman, Adamu Muazu as the running mate to Jonathan, which took over Abuja streets as soon as Jonathan was declared sole candidate of  the party a forthnight ago.

    Muazu has not disowned or disassociated himself  from the posters, a week after they flooded Abuja.

    If he has nothing to do with it, political watchers expect Muazu to announce to the public that the posters were the handiwork of his detractors. This was yet to be done as at Thursday last week.

    Another allegation has it that Jigawa State Governor; Sule Lamido shelved his Presidential ambition to settle for the number two job under the party.

    But what is being thrown up against Sambo, who many believed has been very loyal and instrumental to all the achievements recorded by Jonathan in the past four years, was the allegation that he has a diminished political value and may not be able to deliver the North for Jonathan in 2015.

    Sambo’s loyalty was said to have facilitated smooth running of the administration unlike the ugly experiences recorded in the past.

    As Jonathan is expected to publicly accept the sole candidacy and announce his running-mate in the next few weeks, political watchers are keenly eager to see if Jonathan will place Sambo’s loyalty above every other consideration, or if he will pick other politicians scheming and strategising to take control of the leadership in 2019.

     

  • Oshiomhole to Jonathan: Ikimi cannot win Edo for you

    Oshiomhole to Jonathan: Ikimi cannot win Edo for you

    Edo State Governor, Adams Oshiomhole, has said that it was a tall dream for President Goodluck Jonathan to think that the defection of Chief Tom Ikimi from the All Progressives Congress to the Peoples Democratic Party would sway victory for PDP in the state.

    Oshiomhole, who was reacting to a boast by President Jonathan that the PDP would recapture Edo State in 2015 and 2016, said it was unfortunate that the President was being deceived by PDP leaders in the state.

    The Governor, who spoke through his Political Adviser, Hon Charles Idahosa, said the President should have checked how many persons defected alongside Ikimi to the PDP.

    He noted that the Binis which constitutes over 50 per cent of Edo population have been marginalized by the PDP-led federal government, adding it was a tall dream for President Jonathan to think that Esan godfathers would win Edo for him.

    “Ikimi said he left APC because after cooking the food, people came and stole both the pot and the food away. But in this case, he forgot that it was Ize-Iyamu who cooked the food that those that left the APC for PDP took along.  Ikimi went to the stadium to hijack the show by introducing Ize-Iyamu instead of Ize-Iyamu introducing him to the President.

    “Ize-Iyamu, who did all the cooking, was now a spectator. Dr.  Samuel Ogbemudia was never mentioned there, former Governor Lucky Igbinedion was seated there, his father Esama was seated and none of them were asked to speak, yet President Jonathan is boasting that PDP will win Edo. That is laughable.

    “We will deal with them in February. As we speak today there is no single Bini man or woman who is a minister, Permanent Secretary, CEO, so what is the PDP going to tell Bini people that will make the Binis vote for PDP? And the days of rigging are over. We are going to deal with them. Every appointment is in Esan and Uromi in particular. It is a wild dream to say they will win Edo.”

     

  • Nigeria’ll overcome its challenges, says Jonathan

    Nigeria’ll overcome its challenges, says Jonathan

    •Nigeria won’t sink, says  Oritsejafor 

    president Goodluck Jonathan  has said Nigeria will overcome its challenges .

    He spoke during the 54th Independent Anniversary Interdenominational Church Service at the National Christian Centre, Abuja, themed: ‘Be Still’.

    He said: “God know that we have challenges and even before these challenges came, God knew that we were going to have them. There is nothing that he does not know, because whatever he does, is for a purpose.”

    “As a nation, we are facing these challenges. As Pastor Ayo (Oritsejafor)  said, we fought a civil war for 30 months. That time, the world was not even as sophisticated as it is today. Even when we heard about “ Ogbunigwe” it was like going to the moon. But now, even a little boy of twelve years can couple a gun by just going to the internet and kill people. Society has become so sophisticated and open that people continue to abuse privileges.

    “But because of the prayers of Nigerians, we will overcome the challenges of our country. The only thing is to appeal to all  of us Nigerians to be united. If we are united, there is nothing we cannot conquer.”

    Speaking on how the country defeated  the Ebola  Virus Disease, he said: “This is good example that all Nigerians must learn. When Patrick Sawyer brought Ebola to Nigeria, it was in Lagos that this incident happened and in terms of politics, Lagos is an opposition party but the central government is the ruling party. From Lagos, Ebola moved to Rivers State and this is also an opposition party  state. But because all Nigerians fought Ebola irrespective of political persuasion, irrespective of religion, or ethnicity, we defeated Ebola.

    “We appealed to people to stop shaking hands, and as individuals, Nigerians became very hygienic. It was not just one person, or Mr. President or the governors, or other  officials, yes they did their work, but we defeated Ebola because all Nigerians agreed  to fight the war against Ebola. That is the strengthen of unity.”

    “But what makes us great is the complexity of our people. Nigeria is a country of very intelligent people. We can conquer any situation. And for us to even do better, we need to unite. For us we will continue to promise that we will do our best. We have started so many projects, this is not the place for that, otherwise they will say we gave started doing campaign. We are convinced that we are going the right direction.

    “Taking the issue of unemployment we are doing our best. We have set up the required process and God will see us through.”

    Delivering the message yesterday, President of Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, said the country’s problems  are self-inflicted.

    He said: “Nigeria will not sink, somebody supernatural is in the boat.

    “God, who preserved Nigeria through the 30-months civil war, has the power to calm the storm. If civil war did not consume Nigeria, Boko Haram will not consume Nigeria. God is in control, but he puts us in charge. This nation will not be taken over by evil. Peace is coming to Nigeria. We will tell the world that Nigeria is one.

    “Most of the problems of Nigeria are self-inflicted. Corruption did not fall from the moon. It is self-inflicted. Corruption is fed by greed.

    The foundation of greed is poverty mentality. Poverty mentality is thinking that what you have is not enough and you continue to struggle to get more.

    “Corruption is what we have done to ourselves. There is corruption in high and low places. There is corruption at home, schools, at job, everywhere. It is self-inflicted.

    “Terrorism is self-inflicted. Terrorism is not fueled by poverty. Terrorism is caused by extreme religious ideology.”

  • APC: Jonathan playing politics with Chibok girls

    APC: Jonathan playing politics with Chibok girls

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) has accused the Federal Government of seeking to negotiate the timing of the release of the Chibok girls to create a public relations boost, rather than out of a genuine concern for the girls. They are in their sixth months in captivity.

    In a statement yesterday by its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, the party said the clearest evidence of the government’s manipulation of the girls’ release came during President Goodluck Jonathan’s visit to New York to attend the UN General Assembly.

    “Apparently assured, somehow that the girls were about to be released, the administration set up an elaborate publicity event in New York, rented the necessary crowd and booked back-to-back interviews with the international media to enable the President luxuriate in the girls’ release. This event was billed for the five-star Pierre Hotel in Manhattan, close to the UN headquarters.

    “Nigerians will remember that on September 23, the military announced, on Twitter, the imminent release of the girls, only to retract the statement shortly after. In the intervening period, thousands of ‘supporters’ of the President gathered at the Pierre Hotel to welcome the President after the release of the girls, while media interviews were booked for him.

    “Such an occasion required prior organisation and knowledge by the government and attendees of the timing of any release of the girls. This whole episode was timed to also coincide with President Jonathan’s speech to the UN General Assembly the next day – September 24th – and to secure maximum advantage for the government. Somehow, the whole process collapsed like a pack of cards, to the chagrin of those seeking to exploit the innocent girls for political advantage,” it said.

    The APC condemned the politicisation of the plight of the Chibok girls, saying since the incompetence of the Jonathan administration led to the abduction of the girls in the first instance, it must not seek to make political capital out of their release.

    “What should be paramount is securing the release of the girls as soon as possible, not securing their release to fit with a schedule that benefits President Jonathan politically. For the girls, their parents and indeed all Nigerians, this abduction saga has been a nightmare. It is time for it to end,” the party said.

    It said the same Jonathan administration that rebuffed appeals from well-meaning Nigerians to negotiate the release of the girls in their early days in captivity, had suddenly swung into “feverish action”, sending its cronies to negotiate with the abductors and even expressing the readiness to swap the Boko Haram commanders for the girls.

    “We believe the government should do whatever it takes to secure the release of the girls. We believe nothing is too much to do to get the girls back home safely and bring relief to their parents and families. But we suspect government’s sudden effort, which is aimed at giving a boost to President Jonathan’s candidacy for next year’s presidential election.

    “This is most unconscionable, most exploitative and blatantly shameless. It confirms what we have been saying all along that the Jonathan administration knows more about the Boko Haram insurgency than it has admitted, and that the administration is exploiting the insurgency for the President’s re-election. Decent Nigerians are scandalised at this exploitative and deceitful behaviour of their government, and it must stop forthwith,” APC said.

  • APC to Jonathan: you can’t get Rivers

    APC to Jonathan: you can’t get Rivers

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Rivers State has dismissed the boast by President Goodluck Jonathan that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) will ‘recover’ the state next year.

    In a statement yesterday in Port Harcourt by its Chairman, Dr. Davies Ibiamu Ikanya, the party said: “This boast made on Saturday by President Jonathan at the PDP’s Southsouth rally in Benin City, the Edo State capital, is ridiculous because it runs counter to the reality on ground in Rivers State.

    “President Jonathan’s boast is obviously based on ignorance about present political reality in Rivers State. He may not have known that the state PDP leader and prospective governorship candidate, Nyesome Wike, has polarised the party to the extent that it cannot even win a councillorship seat in a fair and free election.

    “Apart from this, Wike, on whom the President is building his hopes of PDP reclaiming Rivers State, has lost political relevance since he left the mainstream of the political family that binds Rivers State together.

    “Wike is either deluding himself or deliberately feeding Mr. President with lies in a bid to feather his nest.”

    Ikanya cited Jonathan’s ‘wickedness’ towards Rivers State as yet another reason why PDP can never recapture power in the state.

    The APC chairman said: “On what basis should the people of Rivers State vote for PDP in 2015? Is it based on the wicked policies of the Jonathan administration against Rivers State and its people?

    “Is it based on the ceding of our oil wells to his home State of Bayelsa and supporting Akwa Ibom and Abia states to take over our oil wells? Or is it because he has ensured that the Federal Government does not cite any meaningful project in Rivers State?

    “Or his deliberate refusal to implement the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Report on Ogoni? President Jonathan has left no one in doubt of his deep hatred for Rivers State and its people, so how can we support him or any PDP candidate in 2015?”

    “In any case, the feats of the Amaechi administration are enough to give us victory in future elections. These feats, which are well known, include making Port Harcourt the World Book Capital City, eradication of militancy, the dogged fight for the oil wells and other rights of Rivers State and its people, as well as award-winning achievements in education, agriculture, health, etc.”

  • Adoption for 2015: North vows to stop Jonathan

    Adoption for 2015: North vows to stop Jonathan

    Following its long time agitation for power to return to the region, in view of the rotational presidency agreement in the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Northern Nigeria has resolved to dump PDP for All Progressive Congress (APC) in the 2015 Presidential election.

    The development is in reaction to the recent adoption of the incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan by the National Working Committee (NWC) of the PDP as the sole presidential candidate of the party in 2015, against the presidential ambition of other party members from the North.

    Aside being aggrieved over the apparently dead zoning arrangement of the ruling party, the North had consistently considered President Jonathan incapable of ruling the country, using the security challenges bedevilling the country and northern region in particular as a case study.

    Prominent northern leaders who spoke to our Correspondent stated that since the PDP has shut it doors against the North by adopting President Jonathan as its sole presidential candidate, the region has no alternative  but to ensure that the ruling party is defeated at the national level in the 2015 general elections.

    Spokesman of the prominent Northern Elders Forum (NEF), Prof. Ango Abdullahi, said: “Now, that the PDP has again shut its door against the North, obviously it makes more sense for the North to fight back and ensure that PDP loses this election at the federal level.”

    According to the professor, “We have said that, we would be working for the return of leadership to the North on the grounds of fairness, equity and justice initially, thinking that the PDP, when it adopted the zoning policy, would live with this policy and respect it. But from all indications, from 2007 up to this particular point in time, the PDP has reneged on the zoning policy.

    “As far as the North is concerned, it is not asking for power simply because it wants power. The argument has always been what is equitable and what is just. I was once a member of the PDP at the top level and I was aware of everything that transpired on this power rotation arrangement between the North and the South. The South had its turn of eight years and the North was expecting that it was going to have its own turn of eight years.

    “Reluctantly, they agreed that Umaru Yar’adua should come on board and he did come on board and died after three years. So, it makes sensible and logical gesture for the PDP to say, ‘Well, the North has not had its eight years, it had three. One was lost to the Vice President because the constitution said so. So, the remaining fours years, starting from 2011, would sensibly have been conceded to the North, but that was not done.

    “And the PDP powers who felt they could do whatever they want and they could disregard the law from court and the constitution of their own political party insisted that Jonathan should run in 2011 and I think with the connivance of some Northerners, mainly the governors who sold out.

    “So, our grounds are not wanting power just because we want power, it is recognition of equity, justice and fairness.

    “Now that the PDP has again shut its door against the North, obviously it makes more sense for the North to fight back and ensure that PDP loses this election at the federal level.

    “Don’t worry about how many aspirants APC has, so long as a northerner will emerge, we will support him. There is no problem at all.

    “If you are observant, you would have seen a document yesterday which was planted in a national daily, prepared by Research Integrity in Lagos. The report made interesting reading. It was very clear that Jonathan is not even in the third or fourth position in terms of national survey, as to who is the best candidate for Nigeria in 2015. Across the nation, the man was not even rated even 10th.

    “So, the issue has shifted from resistance from the North, but resistance from the entire country, that the man is not fit to remain in office after 2015. So, the North has no problem with any of the aspirants that emerges from their primaries in the APC.

    “First of all, we  support  the primaries because the primaries are indications of democracy. But you could see what has happened in the PDP; they shut everybody out against their will and they don’t have the will to fight back. “So, the APC should respect its constitution in terms of how candidates emerge from local government up to the Presidency. If they respect their constitution and carry out their primaries openly, fairly and transparently, they should have no problem of acceptance of the candidate that emerges as winner. So, from that point on, everybody’s hands should be on deck.” Similarly, the mouthpiece of Northern Nigeria, Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), said it was waiting for the outcome of APC’s primaries to decide who to support, but the body language of the forum is that it will support PDP’s candidate. Chairman of the ACF, IGP Ibraheem Coomasie (rtd) told our correspondent in a telephone interview: “Well, it is not yet time to disclose our plan ‘B’. But I believe you saw our open letter to Mr. President recently, where we raised issues concerning the security and economic challenges of the North. They have refused to reply to that letter. Instead, they have been very busy attacking ACF. “We are talking about what is happening; killings every now and then, but government has refused to do anything. Now, even after our letter, Kano was bombed again, several people were killed. They killed people in Sanga Local Government Area of Kaduna State. So, what is the purpose of government in the constitution? It is simply security and welfare of the people. “So, as for the Plan ‘B’ of the North, we will keep it to ourselves. We don’t disclose it now; not until all the political parties bring out their candidates. “Let the opposition party bring out somebody first, because it is the duty of the political parties to do their primaries and bring out their candidate. It is then that we will know who to support.” A coalition of northern youths under the auspices of Arewa Youth Leaders on Thursday rose from an emergency meeting in Kaduna to condemn the adoption of President Jonathan by the PDP, against the zoning principle. The youths declared that power must return to the North and North- East in particular, noting that even in the North, the North-East is the only zone that has been marginalised after the demise of the late Prime Minister, Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, in 1966. The youths in a communique issued at the end of the meeting said: “It is very disheartening that within the PDP, some northerners with presidential credentials whom it was strongly believed would give a shot at the presidency to provide credible alternative leadership seems to be reneging due to a subterfuge/staged managed arrangement of endorsing the incumbent.” The communique jointly signed by the Chairman and Secretary of the Communique Drafting Committee, Musa Adamu and Alex Moses respectively, stated further: “The PDP’s adoption defeats the essence of democracy and it amounts to jettisoning the privilege and advantage position due to the north and the succour to be brought to Nigerians. “In the spirit of developing our nascent democracy and giving sense of belonging to all, rotational leadership at all levels in the country should be encouraged. In this context, there is need for power to shift to the North and North-East in particular, having been in limbo after the brutal demise of the late Prime Minister, Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa in 1966. “Again, when Alhaji Atiku Abubakar emerged as Vice President in 1999 under the platform of PDP, the process of transiting him to a substantive President in 2007 was unduly suffocated by presidential abuse of power. “The leadership or presidency of this country must speedily move from trial and error to decisiveness and absolute display of informed decisions and political will in order to secure the future of its citizens. “The choice of the right person for the job should be centred around experience, integrity, liberal disposition, courage, pure civilian with democratic credentials, etc and this is where the former vice president, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, the Turakin Adamawa, takes the lead among other distinguished gentlemen.” The youths also expressed dismay over the grave insecurity and diminishing quality leadership in the country, saying, this is affecting all aspects of national life, which must be halted immediately.

    A former Federal lawmaker and prominent voice from the North, Dr. Junaid Mohammed, declined speaking for the North on its next line of action. He said it is time for the North to speak for itself and turn themselves away from the PDP.

    According to him, “the  North has had nothing from the PDP except wholesale and retail tragedy, de-industrialisation, marginalisation and economic warfare as well as total destruction of the North-East, which is a very important part of the North itself.

    “As for me, I have never belonged to the PDP and I don’t believe in the zoning or rotation from the days of my political career from the NPN down to 1999. It would be much more appropriate to ask those opportunist governors, who believed, somehow, they can salvage the north or they can protect themselves and their ill-gotten wealth by belonging to the PDP about their plan ‘B’.

    “I also don’t believe it is the business of the other Nigerians to simply come to the aide of the North, because the north itself shot itself on the foot by going to vote for the PDP. Now, the North is learning the hard way. You do not to go into agreement with dishonourable people. Because, such an agreement will always boomerang because democracy is first of all, a game of number. It is those who have the number that will always carry th day.

    “If the North is willing and ready to talk to other Nigerians, fine, but we must know that democracy system is not built this way and you don’t embark on nation building this way, because everything now is built on lies, on opportunism, on you chop, I chop basis. Now that is has collapsed, they can go back to the drawing board and start afresh and see whether we can begin to have elite, political, binding consensus, without which no nation can be built.”

    In his own view, former ACF Spokesman and Northern leader in the just concluded National Conference, Anthony Sani, said: “The problems some Nigerians have with the adoption of President Jonathan as the PDP presidential candidate is that such adoption does not promote internal democracy within political parties, leading to some form of party dictatorship. I say this because the party members have been short-changed by the exercise.

    “I pray PDP knows it is the ruling party and that its place in the order of things is to provide order and direction in the polity, whether by way of lodestar or bellwether,” he said.

    On the plan ‘B’ of the North, Sani opined that, politics of power shift and rotation died in 2011 when Nigerians voted President Jonathan against existing arrangement, which was actually espoused by the South.

    According to him, “Politics of power shift or rotation died in 2011 when Nigerians voted President Jonathan against existing arrangement, which was actually espoused by the South. So, the media would not be promoting national unity when it gives regional coloration to almost everything under the sun.

    “As democrats, northerners have accepted that politics of identity be supplanted by democracy proper.

    “When you say northerners are agitating for power to return to the North, the impression is that power is meant for the North. This is wrong because by 2015, the South will have ruled for 14 of the 16 years of democracy from 1999. You also forget that military regimes were run by junta that represented the military that cut across regional boundaries.

    “I therefore believe candidates from the North will go round the country and present themselves to Nigeria as to why Nigerians should vote them and not the incumbent. They will do so as Nigerians and not because power must return to the north or because the incumbent is from the South.”

  • Jonathan Rally: Enugu denies absence of federal lawmakers

    Jonathan Rally: Enugu denies absence of federal lawmakers

    THE Enugu State Movement for the Re-election of President Goodluck Jonathan (EMJ), has refuted a report claiming that most members of the National Assembly from the state were absent at the rally, held on Thursday in Enugu to promote the re-election of President Goodluck Jonathan. The report had stated that only Senator Ayogu Eze attended the rally organized by the EMJ. A statement signed by EMJ Chairman, Charles Egumgbe, stressed that contrary to the report, which he described as misleading; the only members of the National Assembly missing at the rally were the Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu and Senator Gil Nnaji. He, however, disclosed that Senator Nnaji had formally sought permission to be excused from the event, as he was taking his son abroad. “It is quite surprising that the said report would claim that Senator Ayogu Eze was the only member of the National Assembly at the rally when, indeed, all the other members of the National Assembly, except Senator Ike Ekweremadu and Senator Nnaji, were there and they were all recognized by the masters of ceremony. “I am at a loss as to where the reporter got his story from, for it was clearly misleading and mischievous.” Egumgbe said. He named the members of National Assembly at the rally to include Senator Ayogu Eze and eight House of Representatives members in Toby Okechukwu (Aninri/Awgu/Oji River), Offor Chukwuegbo ( Enugu South/ Enugu North), Mrs. Peace Nnaji (Nkanu East and West), Kingsley Ebenyi (Enugu East/Isiuzo) Ogbuefi Ozomgbachi (Udi/Ezeagu), Stella Ngwu (Igbo-Etiti/Uzo-Uwani), Pat Asadu (Nsukka/Igbo Eze South) and Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi (Udenu/Igbo- Eze North). Egumgbe also used the occasion to thank Dr. Jonathan, Vice President Arc. Namadi Sambo who represented the President and his entourage that included the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator Anyim Pius Anyim and the Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters, Prof. Alkali. The EMJ also commended its grand patron, Senator Ken Nnamani and other patrons incuding Governor Sullivan Chime, former governors Jim Nwobodo, Allison Madueke and Okwesilieze Nwodo who were all at the rally and extolled Chime for his sterling services and support for Mr. President.