Tag: Judge

  • Police arrest two for allegedly assaulting judge

    Police arrest two for allegedly assaulting judge

    Officers attached to Abraka Police Division have arrested two members of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW), Abraka branch, for allegedly assaulting a high court judge.

    The Nation learnt that the suspects- Igbuzor Elliot and Innocent Eboyiteye, were allegedly operating an illegal park beside Delta Line Transport Company.

    It was gathered that the suspects allegedly accosted the judge after he parked his sport utility vehicle (SUV) with a customised number plate and abused him.

    The Nation learnt that the suspects asked the judge why he parked his car close to their park, the judge identified himself, but one of the suspects said: “Judge my yansh”.

    The suspects allegedly pushed the judge and he fell.

    A police source, who confirmed the incident, said: “The men are in our custody. They will be arraigned.”

     

  • Judge orders trial-within-trial in illegal arms importation case

    Judge orders trial-within-trial in illegal arms importation case

    The Federal High Court in Lagos yesterday ordered a trial-within-trial to determine the truthfulness of statements made by suspected importers of arms and ammunition.

    Justice Ayokunle Faji made the order after the Department of State Services (DSS) Head of Investigation Mr. Wale Odu testified.

    The Federal Government arraigned Oscar Okafor, Donatus Achinulo, Mahmud Hassan, Mathew Okoye (at large) and Salihu Danjuma  last June 14 for illegally importing double barrel shortguns, pump action rifles and single barrel shotguns (firearms) without authorisation.

    Led in evidence by the prosecutor, Mr. Julius Ajaikaye, Odu said he took over the case from the Nigeria Customs Services last February.

    He said he interrogated Hassan and Okafor, and that Hassan told him that he was the sole director of Hassan Trade Nigeria Limited, which is the consignee and importer of the arms.

    “He and Okafor had several meetings at Southern Sun Hotel, Kingsway Road, Ikoyi, where he (Okafor) agreed to collect N4million for the clearance of the container. In one of the meetings, Okafor told him that he was charging N4million because the container was carrying pump action rifles.”

    The witness said it was Customs officers’ refusal to collect N1million bribe that led to 100 percent inspection of the container.

    Odu said Okafor also confessed that he participated in loading the container in Turkey with Okoye, and that he handed over a falsified Bill of Lading to Hassan for clearance in Nigeria.

    Hassan’s lawyer, Yakubu Galadima, raised objection to the tendering of his client’s statement. He claimed that statement was not obtained voluntarily.

    Other defence counsel Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) Dr Paul Ananaba (SAN) also aligned themselves with Galadima’s submission.

    The defendants were arraigned on nine counts of conspiracy to illegally import prohibited firearms, “uttering” of forged documents, bribery and importation of prohibited goods.

    All the defendants pleaded not guilty.

    Justice Faji adjourned till tomorrow.

  • Drama: Judge compels accused to lead own defence witness

    Drama: Judge compels accused to lead own defence witness

    There was a mild drama at the Federal High Court II, Jos, on Thursday when the Judge compelled an accused being tried by the court to lead his defence witness, following the absence of his (accused) counsel in court.

    The accused, Ibrahim Suleiman, a Jos-based business man, has been standing trial since 2007 over alleged involvement in hacking into the system of the defunct First Inland Bank plc.

    He is being tried by EFCC on a seven-count charge of money laundering, contrary to Money Laundry Prohibition Act of 2004, among others.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that trouble began for the accused when a letter came from his two counsel, Mr Uche Mgbemena and Mr S. Ogunbiyi, explaining their inability to be in court to represent him.

    Mgbemena was bereaved while Ogunbiyi said he was ill and not fit enough to be in court.

    When the case came up before the judge, Justice Ayo Emmanuel, the accused pleaded with the court to adjourn the case following the hiccups created by the absence of his counsel.

    However, the judge refused his appeal.

    “The last time we sat on Oct. 12, 2017, we all agreed that you will take your subpoenaed defence witness today on resumption, more so that you have exhausted your adjournment privileges.

    “As you can see, the prosecution counsel has opposed your application for adjournment.

    “So, you have to continue with your case now that the defence witness is here for you to ask him your questions,” Emmanuel said.

    However, Suleiman, who was unrelenting in his pleas, said: “My Lord, my counsels are not here in court and I am constrained now.

    “I can’t continue on my own because I don’t even know what to ask him (Defense witness).’’

    “As it is now, I don’t even have the documents such as the bank statements of my account which are with my counsel; supposing I have them, I may try.

    “My Lord, I am not a lawyer and I don’t think I can do it,” he pleaded.

    The Judge then ordered the court clerks to quickly produce the statements of account from the case file and present to the accused.

    At this point, Suleiman studied the documents and engaged his own witness, Mr David Joshua, a Fund Transfer Officer with Sterling Bank Plc, for almost three hours.

    When the accused asked the witness whether some of the entries and withdrawals contained in the two statements tagged Exhibits P12 and D10 could be said to be regular, the witness said, “they are not regular’’.

    “This kind of transactions are not regular; both statements of accounts are contradicting themselves. In P12, N400.7 million came in on June 29, 2007 but it came in D10 after N165m came in the same day.’’

    “Looking at the transactions that took place, nothing like hacking took place; this I can prove,’’ he said.

    Joshua said that what happened was a manipulation done by a bank staff.

    “In banking system, a bank statement of a customer can be obtained in any branch of the bank and it will always be the same irrespective of the time.’’

    Joshua explained that the sum contained in the petition letter tagged as Exhibit P1 could not be seen in both P12 and D10.

    The Prosecution Counsel, Mr Cosmas Ugwu, in his cross examination of the witness, asked him whether a banker would deliberately do such transactions in both P12 and D10.

    In his response, Joshua said: “yes; with a different intention, such narrations can be done.’’

  • Alleged N220m fraud:  ICPC quizzes judge, secures conviction of two

    Alleged N220m fraud:  ICPC quizzes judge, secures conviction of two

    The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) yesterday said it has arrested and quizzed a former Kano State High Court Judge, Hon. Justice Kabiru Mamman Auta in connection with a N220million fraud.

    The judge was alleged to have conspired with some other persons to defraud a Kano businessman, Alhaji Bashir Sani Kwangila Yakasai of the cash.

    The judge and other accomplices allegedly told the businessman that they were acting on behalf of a former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Aloma Mukhtar.

    Upon interrogation, the judge admitted that he had refunded N20million out of the cash to Yakasai.

    These disclosures were made in a statement by the spokesperson of the commission, Mrs. Rasheedat Okoduwa (mni).

    The statement said: “A former Kano State High Court Judge, Hon. Justice Kabiru Mamman Auta has been arrested by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, ICPC, on allegations bordering on criminal conspiracy, cheating and forgery.

    “Auta was arrested by operatives of the Commission on Tuesday when he was invited for interrogation on allegations that he had conspired with some other persons to defraud a Kano businessman, Alhaji Bashir Sani Kwangila Yakasai (SKY) of the sum of N220,000,000.

    “The matter was referred to the Commission after it had been reported to the National Judicial Council which had constituted a committee to investigate the allegations.

    “The amount involved had been fraudulently obtained from Yakasai by Hon. Justice Auta and his accomplice Bashir Sufi, on the pretext that they were acting on behalf of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Aloma Mukhtar.

    “Justice Auta in his statement to the commission had disclosed that he had paid N20, 000,000 as part repayment to Yakasai during the course of the matter.

    “Hon. Justice Auta was released from detention on administrative bail, while further investigation into the matter continues.

    In another development, ICPC said it has secured the conviction of two accused persons for engaging in visa racketeering.

    A separate statement by the anti-graft agency added: “Hon. Justice S. S. Ogunsanya of an Ikeja High Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos State has found Mr. Ademosu Iseoluwapo and Itoha Ihiere guilty of visa racketeering and therefore convicted them of the offence.

    “The convicts were dragged to court by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), for forgery and providing misleading information to the British High Commission in Lagos with the intent of procuring visas to the United Kingdom.

    “The first convict, Mr. Ademosu Iseoluwapo, a staff of the Lagos State Ministry of Physical Planning and Urban Development had used his position in the ministry to procure false and misleading documents for the second convict, Mr. Itoha Ihiere who was not even a staff of the Ministry while trying to procure visas for other genuine staff of the Ministry.

    “Iseoluwapo had provided Ihiere with a fake Lagos State Government identity card and pay-slip of the ministry to facilitate his visa procurement.

    “The convicts had earlier pleaded guilty to a two-count charge for “…knowingly making false statement to an officer of the Commission with the intent to mislead thereby contravening Section 25(1) (a) and punishable under Section 25(1) (b) of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Act, 2000 which prescribes 2 years imprisonment or an option of a fine not exceeding N100, 000 or both.”

    “In his allocutus, the defence counsel, Mr. Qudus Mumuni pleaded with the court to temper justice with mercy as the 1st convict is the bread winner of his family.

    “He added that Iseoluwapo committed the offence with the intent to help Ihiere go abroad to make a living and help his family especially his only daughter.

    “In her ruling, Hon. Justice Ogunsanya, held that such actions by the convicts were responsible for giving the nation a bad name abroad.

    “She therefore advised Ihiere to opt for an honest means of making a living such as farming in order to cater for his daughter.

    “The judge therefore sentenced Iseoluwapo and Ihiere to pay a fine of N50,000 each.”

  • Judge withdraws from trial of Boko Haram sectional leader

    Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court in Abuja has withdrawn from the trials of Mohammed Usman (aka Khalid Albarnawi), alleged leader of a Boko Haram splinter group, his wife Halima and six others.

    The Boko Haram splinter group is named Jama’atu Ansarul Muslimina Fi Biladis Sudan (aka Ansaru)

    Justice Tsoho announced his withdrawal yesterday during a ruling on an application by six of the eight defendants, who wanted him to transfer the case to another judge.

    The Federal Ministry of Justice, earlier this year, arraigned them before Justice Tsoho on an 11-count amended charge of terrorism.

    They were, among others, accused of taking hostage and killing nine foreigners, including British and Italian expatriates, between 2011 and 2013 in Sokoto, Kebbi, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe and others in the North.

    Justice Tsoho ordered that they be remanded in prison.

    But following an application by the prosecution, the judge changed his mind and directed that the defendants be kept in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) and adjourned for trial.

    At the court yesterday, lead prosecuting lawyer Shuaibu Labaran said prosecution was ready for trial.

    But before the judge could decide whether or not the prosecution should call its witness, some defendants indicated their intention to speak

    Justice Tsoho then stood down proceedings for 15 minutes to enable them confer with their lawyers.

    On resumption, lawyers to six defendants, including Niven Momoh, told the court that their clients want the case transferred to another judge.

    They said by reversing himself on their place of detention, the judge exhibited bias.

    Lawyers to two of the defendants, however, said they have faith in the judge and wanted to be tried separately from others.

    Although Labaran opposed the request for transfer and urged the court to allow the prosecution to call its witnesses, Justice Tsoho thought otherwise.

    According to him, because the trial is a joint one and majority of the defendants sought a transfer, it is in the interest of justice for him to withdraw.

    He announced his withdrawal and transferred the case file to the court’s Acting Chief Judge Justice Adamu Kafarati for re-assignment.

     

  • ‘Lawyers should be notified when a judge won’t sit’

    ‘Lawyers should be notified when a judge won’t sit’

    Miss Chizotam Akwiwu studied law at the University of Lagos (UNILAG). An associate at the Alliance Law firm, she recalls how accompanying her mother, a lawyer, to court influenced her decision to join the profession. She also tells JOSEPH JIBUEZE that being the grand-daughter of a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), the late Chief Emmanuel Akwiwu, made her career choice easy.

    Matlock is an American television legal drama, starring Andy Griffith in the title role of criminal defence attorney Ben Matlock.

    Count on Matlock to visit the crime scene, scope out the clues everyone else missed, and dramatically reveal the real criminal (usually a killer) during a climactic trial sequence.

    As a kid, Miss Chizotam Akwiwu wanted to be like Matlock when she grew up.

    Speaking on her early influences on her road to the legal profession, she said: “I grew up watching a lot of shows on crime, investigation and prosecution. I wanted to be like Matlock! Hence, my first interest in law was criminal law.”

    Why did she switch to commercial law? “With time, I realised that litigation, especially criminal litigation in Nigeria, left so much to be desired. So, my interest shifted to corporate and commercial law,” she said.

    Akwiwu was awarded the Chief Ernest Shonekan prize for the third best overall student in property law when she was called to the Bar.

    She recalls her first day in court. “Before being called to the Bar, I had often gone to court with my mum, especially the Federal High Court, Ikoyi and the High Court Igbosere. So, I was familiar with the court environment.

    “The first time I appeared in court as a lawyer was with the Managing Partner at my firm Uche Val Obi (SAN) and two other lawyers. I was just there to observe proceedings.

    “However, my first solo appearance was before Justice Sonnaike of the High Court Annex at TBS. I was sent to give an update on the on-going mediation between the parties. As simple as that seemed, I was so nervous!’’

    What has been her most challenging case? “I have not encountered any challenging case yet. I see each case as an opportunity to learn and improve myself.”

    Akwiwu said the snail pace of justice administration remains a source frustration for every lawyer.

    “From my little experience so far, I’d say that a major challenge is the long and frustrating process of litigation. I was once in court for a matter only to be informed that the judge had travelled and would not be sitting.

    “This happens a lot when despite counsel leaving their contact information on processes they have to come all the way to court only to be informed that court would not be sitting.

    “This, in my opinion, can affect productivity levels and discourage a young lawyer from pursuing litigation wholeheartedly,” she said.

    Had she the power, she would decisively address the causes of delays and tedious bureaucracy that impede the court system and litigation process.

    “You see cases that commenced in the 1990s/early 2000s still not yet concluded! This is especially in land disputes, and the original parties might even be dead in the course of the ongoing litigation.

    “I’d also like to improve the amount of attention given to the welfare of lawyers by their law firms,” she said.

    Akwiwu had a good grounding as a law student. She had access to her mother’s law books, as well as her grandfather’s library. Being the granddaughter of a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) has its benefits.

    How much of an influence were they? She said: “Just by following my mum to court, observing her dedication to improving the profession in her own little way and her diligence really influenced my choice to study law. It’s truly an honour to call her my mother and learned friend.

    “My parents (especially my mum) did not force me to study law. When they saw my interest they simply encouraged it. They made sure I got internship experiences and had access to all materials I needed.

    “I was also influenced by my grandfather, the late Chief Emmanuel Akwiwu (SAN) and my god-mother/aunt Adaku Akwiwu to read law. I come from a family of many lawyers so it’s almost no surprise!”

    Who are her role models?  “I look up to quite a number of people in the profession, such as my mum (Mrs. Anne Akwiwu) for her work as Deputy Director in the Ministry of Justice and Liaison Officer at the ministry’s Lagos Liaison Office in Marina.

    “Also, my boss Uche Val Obi (SAN) for his immense contribution to both dispute resolution and the corporate and commercial sphere, and Adaku Ufere, Energy Practice Leader at Centurion Law Group, who is a young lawyer making such admirable contributions to Energy Law.”

    What would Akwiwu likely have been if not a lawyer? “I would have been an accountant,” she said. “This is another reason I have decided to specialise in corporate and commercial Law because of the elements of accounting and finance.”

    And where does she see herself in 10 years? “I honestly cannot give a specific answer to this because I am still trying to discover my niche.

    “I intend to specialise in an area of law and master my art. One thing I can say is that by the grace of God, wherever I am in 10 years, I will be a force to be reckoned with.

    “I also see myself contributing to the development of the profession. In line with that objective, I contribute to Lawyard.ng, an online platform for content around relevant systems of law.”

     

  • New judge for Patience Jonathan’s suit

    New judge for Patience Jonathan’s suit

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, will today replace one of the judges on the three-man panel hearing an appeal by the wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Patience, concerning her seized funds.

    Mrs. Jonathan is seeking to stop the permanent forfeiture of $5.7 million and N2,421,953,522.78 to the Federal Government.

    The suit, which was assigned to Justices John Ikyeh, Abimbola Obaseki-Adejumo and Abraham Georgewill last July 5, was stalled on July 12, following the withdrawal of an unnamed member of the panel.

    Justice Ikyeh, who presided over the appeal, noted that three judges were required to form a quorum before an appeal could be heard.

    He adjourned hearing till today.

    “One of us is going to recuse himself from this case for personal reasons, so we are not complete. Two of us cannot make a quorum,” Justice Ikyeh said.

  • New judge for Patience Jonathan’s $5.7m, N2.4b suit

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, will on Monday replace one of the judges on the three-man panel hearing an appeal by the wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Patience, concerning her seized funds.

    Mrs Jonathan is seeking to stop the permanent forfeiture of $5.7million and N2,421,953,522.78 to the Federal Government.

    The suit, which was assigned to Justices John Ikyeh, Abimbola Obaseki-Adejumo and Abraham Georgewill last July 5, was stalled last July 12 following the withdrawal of an unnamed member of the panel.

    Justice Ikyeh, who presided over the appeal, noted that three judges were required to form a quorum before an appeal could be heard.

    He adjourned hearing till Monday.

    “One of us is going to recuse himself from this case for personal reasons, so we are not complete. Two of us cannot make a quorum,” Justice Ikyeh said.

    In law, the verb recuse means to remove someone from a position of judicial authority, either a judge or a member of a jury, who is deemed unacceptable to judge, usually because of some bias.

    Mrs Jonathan’s appeal arose from an order obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) last April 26, from the Federal High Court in Lagos, temporarily forfeiting the cash to the government.

    The commission told Justice Mojisola Olatoregun, who made the order, that the funds were suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities.

    It said the $5.7m was part of the $6,791,599.64 (about N2.1billion) which Mrs Jonathan allegedly directed her aides to pay into her account between February 8, 2013 and January 30, 2015, while her husband was President.

    Mrs. Jonathan, the commission said, had earlier spent $949, 282.98 (about N296, 141,911) from the money.

    It said she also withdrew another $100,000 from the account in April, leaving a balance of $5,731,173.55.

    Justice Olatoregun also ordered the temporary forfeiture of the N2,421,953,522.78 found in an Ecobank Nigeria Ltd account numbered 2022000760 in the name of La Wari Furniture and Baths Ltd.

    The commission said the money also belongs to Mrs Jonathan.

    Last May 22, Justice Olatoregun suspended proceedings in the hearing of the EFCC’s application seeking permanent forfeiture of the cash pending the appellate court’s decision on the interim order.

    She granted the applications of Mrs Jonathan’s lawyer, Chief Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN) and that of Counsel for La Wari Furniture and Baths, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) for a stay.

    Mrs Jonathan, in the notice of appeal, is praying the court to hold that the law cited by the EFCC in its ex-parte application for the temporary forfeiture was inapplicable.

    “A judge is bound by the prayers on the motion paper, and the court has no jurisdiction to make a case for a party different from that presented by the said party,” the appellant said.

  • ‘I dream of becoming a judge’

    ‘I dream of becoming a judge’

    Mrs. Bridget Ijeoma Edokwe, a member of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Abuja branch, was called to the Bar on February 14, 2012. She publishes barristerNG.com, an online law news website. In this interview with Legal Editor JOHN AUSTIN UNACHUKU, Mrs. Edokwe speaks on why she veered into journalism, blogging, the challenges of online publishing and sundry national issues.

    Why law?

    As a matter of fact,  nobody expected me to be a lawyer, being a woman and the last child in the family. Other members took to other disciplinea. I remember vividly, while growing up, watching the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA)  news with my father. I used  to see pictures of lawyers in court, all dressed up in wig and gown, so, I fell in love with those pictures. I told my father that I would be a lawyer one day. He encouraged me and the grace of God saw me through that dream.

    If not law, which other profession would you have pursued?

    Although my first love was law, I have a penchant for journalism, legal information dissemination and writing. The truth is that if I were not a lawyer, I would have been a journalist, and it is the unexplored journalism part of me that is finding ways of expression through the law blog barristerNG.com. We discovered that the majority of lawyers are keen on being abreast with happenings around the legal profession and political circles  in Nigeria and beyond.  So, I thought of a way of making news concerning law and politics easily accessible to them. That gave birth to barristerNG.com and lawyers all over Nigeria have commended our effort so far.

    What are your greatest challenges in the profession?

    It requires hard work, commitment, dedication and ability to balance views. Managing and editing a law blog and at the same time being in active law practice can only be done by a person that has passion for both. Being a young lawyer in digital media is very demanding both in skills, time and resources. You have to sacrifice a lot of time, convenience and learn an entirely new set of skills aside the ones you have learnt as a law student. You must be ready to learn new skills daily. There is also the challenge of people taking your work, which cost you money, sleepless nights and days, without giving you appropriate credit. So, it is not for the faint hearted.

    What do you consider to be the challenges of young lawyers?

    There is a need for improved efforts to regulate the legal profession in the country to advance the frontiers of legal profession. Whereas a lot of progress has been made both in the regulation of the profession and advancing the frontiers of legal practice, there are still a lot yet undone. A closer look at legal practice as it is in Nigeria and other jurisdictions such as the USA and Great Britain will reveal that we have been left behind in terms of regulation and development. I am happy that the current leadership of Nigerian Bar Association under A. B Mahmoud (SAN) have constituted a committee under Chief Anthony Idigbe (SAN) and sub committees under Prof Ernest Ojukwu (SAN)  and Funke Adekoya  (SAN)  to fashion out ways of improving the regulation of the profession and meeting global standards. I hope the committee will do a thorough job. There are other things like the sorry state of young lawyers welfare, the outdated curriculum currently used in training lawyers in Nigeria, Non-encouragement of specialisation in legal practice in Nigeria e.t.c, that need urgent attention and improvement.  But in all, the legal practice in Nigeria is still work in progress  and there is hope that we will meet the global standard one day.

     Which areas of law practice do you like most?

    There is no area of law practice that I don’t like. Besides, a lawyer is not trained to hate or like a particular aspect of law practice. Nevertheless, I have penchant for advocacy, litigation and media law. It is also my dream to be in the Bench one day as a judge. I would like to see practice opportunities for young lawyers who lack practice opportunities because the legal profession, in particular, law firms are not properly structured in a defined format to encourage young lawyers and ensure proper development of young lawyers.

    There is no room for development beyond the limits of the sole proprietors, there is no room for specialization and development of new areas of practice. And most times, the law firms die with the owners.  There is lack of practice opportunities and I will like to see a framework to provide welfare and remuneration package for young Lawyers in the country. I would also like to see an overhaul of the current legal educational curriculum to better prepare lawyers to cope with modern trends in law practice.

    Constant training and retraining of young lawyers by the Nigerian Bar Association is a welcome development, as a young lawyer I would like to see a  standard regulatory  framework for law firms to ensure proper development of young lawyers. A determined, systematic and well monitored  investment  and expansion of practice opportunities for all lawyers by the Nigerian Bar Association will be of great value.

    What is your appraisal of the training facilities for lawyers?

    The NBA can also do a lot in terms of advocating for the change of the current outdated legal educational curriculum, enforce structured remuneration and welfare package for young lawyers in the country to cater for at least their basic needs while learning the ropes. The Bar association should also organise constant training and retraining of young lawyers to meet global trends in practice.

    Any regrets for being a lawyer?

    If there is a reincarnation, I would still want to be a lawyer. In fact, it is the greatest profession in the world and it is a great privilege to be part of it. Above all, I desire to be a lawyer that will stand for truth and justice at all times.

  • EFCC arraigns judge for alleged N4.6m bribe

    EFCC arraigns judge for alleged N4.6m bribe

    •Fishim granted bail on self-recognisance

    THE Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday arraigned judge of the National Industrial Court (NIC), Justice Agbadu Fishim, for allegedly collecting N4.65 million from seven Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs).

    The judge, who was arraigned before Justice Raliat Adebiyi of an Ikeja High Court, was however granted bail on self-recognisance.

    Justice Fishim was arraigned on a 19-count charge of unlawful enrichment.

    EFCC’s prosecutor Rotimi Oyedepo alleged that Justice Fishim received an aggregate of N4.65 million from seven Senior Advocates of Nigeria, one other Lagos-based lawyer and a law firm between 2013 and 2015.

    Oyedepo claimed the money was paid into the judge’s First Bank account, numbered 3008199491.

    He said the judge could not give a reasonable explanation of how the money came into his First Bank account.

    Justice Fishim, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    His counsel, Prof. Amuda Kehinde, pleaded that his client be granted bail in self-recognisance.

    Kehinde argued that his client is a sitting judge and would not jump bail.

    He said he was served with the court papers yesterday about 5p.m and he responded immediately.

    “He is a sitting judge and he has a lot to lose, if he decides to jump bail,” Kehinde said.

    Oyedepo did not oppose the bail application.

    He, however, asked the court to attach conditions to the bail such that the defendant would be mandated to attend trial.

    Justice Adebiyi granted bail to Justice Fishim and directed him to deposit his international passport with the court registrar.

    “It is the discretion of the court to grant bail to the defendant. It should be noted that the main function of bail is so that the defendant attends trial.

    “The defendant is a sitting Judge of the National Industrial Court, who is facing a 19-count charge of unlawful enrichment, which is a bailable offence.

    “I hereby grant the defendant bail on self-recognisance and he is also expected to deposit his international passport with the court Chief Registrar,” Justice Adebiyi ruled.

    In the charge sheet, the EFCC alleged that the judge received N1.4 million from Chief Felix Fagbohungbe (SAN) between December 5, 2013 and February 26, 2015.

    He was alleged to have received N1.1 million in multiples tranches from  Paul Usoro (SAN) between August 5, 2014 and March 26, 2015.

    Other SANs, from whom the judge allegedly received money, were Chief Gani Adetola-Kazeem, who allegedly gave him N100,000 on February 10, 2015; and Mr. Uche Obi, who gave him N250,000 between October 17 and 20, 2013.

    Dr. Muiz Banire (SAN) allegedly gave the judge N500,000 on June 20, 2013; and Chief Adeniyi Akintola (SAN), who gave him a total of N500,000 in two tranches  on June 3, 2013 and February 26, 2015.

    The EFCC claimed that Justice Fishim received N250,000 from Dr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN), in two tranches on December 12, 2014 and September 10, 2015.

    A Lagos-based lawyer, Enobong Etteh, was said to have transferred N300,000 to the judge on October 27, 2014.

    A law firm, Alliance Law Firm, according to the EFCC, also paid N250,000 into the judge’s account on August 21, 2015.

    Justice Fishim’s trial has been adjourned till October 11, 2017.