Tag: Judges

  • Judges, magistrates urged to drive justice sector reforms

    Judges, magistrates urged to drive justice sector reforms

    • …Wike tasked on growing street children menace in Abuja

    Judges and magistrates in the country have been urged not to see themselves as just players in the justice delivery system, but as agents of change need to drive reforms required to ensure effective service delivery.

    The President of the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies (CSLS), Professor Yemi Akinseye-George (SAN) said this while speaking during the opening session of a workshop on “the Model Practice Direction on the implementation of the National Minimum Standards (NMS) for the effective implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) and Administration of Criminal Justice Laws (ACJLs).”

    The two-day capacity-building workshop is organised by the CSLS, with the support of the Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Programme (RoLAC).

    Prof. Akinseye-George said, “As we engage in today’s sessions, I urge each of you (the judges and magistrates in attendance) to see yourselves, not merely as interpreters of orders, but as architects of justice reform. 

    “Your leadership, discipline, empathy, and willingness to innovate will determine how far these reforms travel into the daily lives of Nigerians,” he said.

    The CSLS’ President explained workshop is intended to afford participants the opportunity to take a closer look at the proposed Model Practice Direction, which was developed through the collaborative efforts of stakeholders across the federation with the goal of filling gaps in the ACJA & ACJLs of the various states. 

    He noted that the Model Practice Direction equips judges and magistrates with powerful tools such as active case management, time-bound remand review, virtual hearings where appropriate, technology-driven record keeping, clearer standards for bail, and periodic audit of awaiting-trial cases, among others. 

    Prof. Akinseye-George expressed concern about the surge in the number of street children in Abuja and urged the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike to quickly address the issue.

    He said, “The phenomenon of street children which appears to be rising in Abuja must be addressed with urgency. 

    “We appeal to the Minister of the FCT to apply his proactive approach to project improvement to address the problem of street children in the FCT.”

    Prof. Akinseye-George hailed the renewed efforts of the Federal Government to address the nation’s security challenge, which he noted, has began to yield results.

    He commended the recent appointments recently made in the security sector by President Bola Tinubu and his directive for recruitment of security personnel as part of efforts to end insecurity.

    Prof. Akinseye-George said such efforts should be supported with capacity building for law enforcement personnel to enable them device ways preventing attacks rather than responding or reacting after attacks have taken place.

    He said, “I cannot conclude without expressing support for some of the concrete actions of the government aimed at improving the security situation in the country. 

    “The appointment of more competent professionals to man the security sector is notable. We also note with delight the planned recruitment of more personnel for the police and proactive actions being taken by the military to address rising cases of banditry and violent extremism. 

    “However, it is important to build the capacity of the law enforcement personnel and the military to prevent attacks rather than merely responding or reacting after attacks have happened. 

    “The capacity of the personnel must be strengthened so that they are able to go after the subversive elements who are hiding in the forests and other places only to come out and launch deadly attacks,” he said.

    Prof. Akinseye-George added beyond military operations, governments at all levels must ensure the provision of economic opportunities for militants, bandits and insurgents, who are willing to abandon the lives of criminality. 

    Such efforts, he said, must involve the provision of free and compulsory secondary education for all children and young people from all over the country.

  • ‘Auxiliary’: Judges’ swearing-in, delay in arrival of defendant stall further hearing

    ‘Auxiliary’: Judges’ swearing-in, delay in arrival of defendant stall further hearing

    Yesterday’s further hearing of a case involving a former chairman of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) in Oyo State, Alhaji Mukaila Lamidi, also known as ‘Auxiliary’, was stalled, as officials of the Nigerian Correctional Services delayed in arriving with the suspect in court.

    Although, the judge was said to have arrived early in court, the swearing-in of new judges in Oyo State, which was also held yesterday, didn’t help matters.

    Read Also: Okpebholo inaugurates three judges

    Justice Bayo Taiwo of Fiat Court 2, Oyo State High Court, Ring Road, Ibadan, said the case would resume on December 20 for further hearing.

  • Name them 

    Name them 

    • Nigerians want to know the judges being probed

    Many have praised the National Judicial Council (NJC) for acknowledging that there are petitions against some members of the Bench across board. The highest judicial administrative body announced last week that allegations against 27 unnamed judges were being investigated, but so much about the said allegations, the petitioners, and the judges are shrouded in avoidable secrecy.

    This, in itself, is against the principles of justice and openness. When other Nigerians are to be tried in court, they are named and the alleged offences are laid out in the open. Whether by the anti-graft agencies, the police or Department of State Services (DSS), they are named from the point of being invited, to the point of arraignment in court.

    It has been argued that protecting the identities of their lordships amounts to protecting the integrity of the judiciary, the course of justice and the interest of the public. But, what is sauce for the goose should as well be sauce for the gander. That others are named does not mean that they would even be arraigned if no case is established against them. In the same vein, when it applies to judges who preside over matters involving others, some of whom are professionals or former holders of high offices of state, all must be done in the open.

    This needless secrecy is already spreading to some other cases, including cases of high treason and terrorism. For years now, some people said to be financiers and sponsors of terror attacks in the country and said to have been identified by the DSS are yet to be named, let alone brought to Justice.

    We call on Mr. Lateef Fagbemi, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, as well as the new Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, to step into the matter and assure the public that the judiciary has nothing to hide. As the third arm of government, and one expected to point the way to the other two where politicians preside, judges should show that they are, indeed, above board. There is no better way to demonstrate this than enthroning transparency. The outcome is as good as the process. At every point, we expect that findings would be made public, including how they were arrived at. Who constituted the panels, how did they sit, were the judges represented by counsel and what modes were adopted for presentation of petitions? All these are important in establishing ingredients of fair hearing.

    Read Also: Tinubu seeks to boost Nigerian economy with September China visit

    It should be noted that the future of the country is at stake. Unless a wholesale reform of the judiciary is carried out and a cynical public is carried along, it is impossible to save the tottering ship of state. The 64-year-old Nigerian state has come a long way since independence in 1960, with its twists and turns. Tagging along has been the judiciary, with the likes of Sir Adetokunbo Ademola, Dr. Taslim Elias and Sir Darnley Alexander presiding over the third branch of government in the first two decades, creditably.

    In recent times, the sail has been turbulent, given the way Justice Ayo Salami was controversially removed as President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Walter Onnoghen dragged before the Code of Conduct Tribunal and eased out of the office of Chief Justice of Nigeria, and the rumours surrounding the unceremonial voluntary retirement of his successor, Justice Ibrahim Muhammad Tanko. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola may have retired at the mandatory age of 70, but the cloud surrounding the Supreme Court and other courts of the land under him has been heavy.

    The system must be deodourised. This is one task before Justice Kekere-Ekun. The “trial” of the 27 judges is the first task, and it would determine if the public should repose their confidence in the judiciary under her watch. The investigation should be done speedily to protect the integrity of the judicial system.

  • Alleged misconduct: NJC sets up four committees to investigate 27 judges

    Alleged misconduct: NJC sets up four committees to investigate 27 judges

    *Discards petitions against Justices Dongbam-Memsem, Tsoho, others

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) has empanelled four committees to investigate petitions against about 27 judges on issues relating to allegation of misconduct.

    The NJC at its meeting between August 14 and 15 also elected to discard petitions written against the President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho and other judicial officers both of the Court of Appeal and High Courts.

    It issued a letter of advise to Hon. Justice O. M. Olagunju of Oyo State High Court “to be circumspect as a judicial officer before acting, even in the most challenging situation.”

    NJC’s spokesman, Soji Oye disclosed these in a statement on Friday.

    The statement reads: “The National Judicial Council presided over by the Hon. Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, GCON, at its 106th Meeting of 14 & 15 August 2024, resolved to issue a letter of advise to Hon. Justice O. M. Olagunju of Oyo State High Court to be circumspect as a Judicial Officer before acting, even in the most challenging situation.

    Read Also: NJC clears Kekere-Ekun for CJN

    “The resolution was made after council considered the report of the committee it set up, and mandated it to invite the Hon. Judge to appear before it to defend his uncouch language in a letter addressed to the Chief Justice of Nigeria, challenging council’s decision viz-a-viz its Policy Direction on Appointment of President Court of the Customary Court of Appeal, Oyo State.

    “Council, at the meeting, considered the report of its preliminary complaints Assessment Committee on 22 petitions written against 27 judicial officers of the Federal and State High Courts and decided to empanel four committees to investigate allegations in the petitions that were found meritorious.

    “The remaining 18 petitions were discountenanced for lacking of merit, abandoned, or being sub-judice.

    “The discountenanced petitions are against Hon. Justice Monica B. Dongban-Mensem, CFR, President Court of Appeal, Hon. Justices E. O. Williams Dawodu, B. A. Georgewill, Yargata Timpar, S. D. Samchi, Aisha B. Aliyu, A. A. Aderibigbe M. L. Shuaibu, H. A. O. Abiru and Abdulazeez Waziri (all of the Court of Appeal).

    “Others are Hon. Justice J. T. Tsoho, OFR, Chief Judge Federal High Court, Hon. Justices Z. B. Abubakar, J. K. Omotosho, Sunday B. Onu all of the Federal High Court and Justice Okon E. Abang when he was serving at the Federal High Court, Hon. Justice Kayode Agunloye of the FCT High Court, Hon. Justice Babagana Karumi of the High Court Borno State, Hon. Justice Maimuna A. Abubakar of the High Court of Niger State, Hon. Justice A. A. Aderibigbe of Osun State High Court and Hon. Justice Aisha B. Aliyu of Nasarawa State High Court.

    “Petitions written against Justices Ayodele Oyeyemi Oyebisi, Amaobi L. Agara, Amina Garba, Bello M. Tukur, Omeka Elekwa and O. A. Adetujoye, who served at Asaba and Plateau National and State Assembly Election Tribunal Panels, were also discountenanced.

    “Council also considered the report of its Performance Evaluation of Judicial Officers of Superior Courts of record and resolved to issue letters ranging from commendation, appreciation, no submission and non-performance to 215 judges all over the Federation.

    “It also placed five judges on its pre-sanction watch list register for poor performance. They would be recommended to the council for appropriate sanction if they do not improve on their performance.

    “Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, GCON, in the meeting being the last one before his retirement, appreciated the cooperation he received from members of the council and the council’s secretariat and implored them to extend same to his successor.

    “Members of the Council also eulogized the outgoing CJN and Chairman one after the other and wished him good health in retirement.”

  • Lagos judges go on 54-day vacation

    Lagos judges go on 54-day vacation

    • By Elizabeth Eze

    Judges of the Lagos State judiciary have commenced their annual long vacation.

    Consequently, the court rooms would be closed to litigation for the next 54 days .

    The long vacation which commenced yesterday, Monday July 22, will end on September 13.

    This was contained in a public notice signed by the acting Registrar of the Lagos Judiciary, Mr Tajudeen Elias on behalf of the Chief Judge, Justice Kazeem Alogba.

    The long vacation was preceded by Judges Conference which they have been attending in batches to enable cross fertilisation of ideas and laws in the course of dispensing justice.

    The public notice stated: “It is hereby stated for general information that the Chief Judge of Lagos State, Honourable Justice Kazeem Alogba  has, pursuant to Order 49 Rule 4 of the High Court of Lagos State (Civil Procedure Rules, 2019, approved that Monday, the 22nd day of July, 2024 to Friday, the 13th day of September, 2024, both dates inclusive shall be the period filed for the long vacation,

    The statement announced the appointment of vacation judges that shall preside over urgent matters in the seven judicial divisions of the state during the vacation.

    The vacation judges Ikeja division include Justice Iyabo Akinkugbe  from Monday, July 22, 2024 to Friday, August  2. 2024, Justice  I. O Harrison  from Monday, August 5, 2024 to Friday, August 16, 2024; , Justice A.M. Lawal from Monday August 19, 2024 to Friday, August 30, 2024 while Justice E.A,O, Opesanwo will preside over urgent case from Monday September 2, 2024 to Friday, September 13, 2024.

     In Lagos Division of the judiciary, Justice E.O. Ogundare, Justice Justice Serifat Sonaike, Justice A.A. Oyebanji and Justice O.O. Martins shall preside on cases during same corresponding period.

    The vacation judges for Badagry Division are Justice  M.O. Dawodu from Monday, August 5, 2024 to Friday, August 16, 2024 and Justice O.A. Adamson from Monday August 19, 2024 to Friday August 30, 2024.

    Justice Wasiu Animahun and Justice G.A. Safari were appointed vacation judges for Epe Division.

    Read Also: Uzodimma swears in 10 new judges in Imo

     Vacation judges for Ikorodu Division are Justice Olufunke Sule-Amzat and Justice Rahman Oshodi who shall serve for same corresponding period.While Justice Kudirat Jose and Justice Oyindamola Ogala were appointed for Eti-Osa Division, Justice Animaun B ashua and Justice K.O. Dawodu were appointed for Yaba/Surulere Division for same corresponding period. 

    The public notice stated that notwithstanding the long vacation, the Criminal Division of the High Court of Lagos state may sit throughout the period of the vacation. Where a judqe of a Criminal Division is on vacation, a vacation judge may be assigned to deal with all urgent pending criminal cases in the court

     “Notwithstanding the long vacation, any case or matter may be heard by a judge during the period of the vacation (except on Sunday or Public Holiday). Where such cause or matter is urgent or a judge, at the request of all the parties. concerned, agreed to hear it.”

    It said: “Any application for an urgent hearing during the vacation may be made by summons in chambers, before the vacation judge or the judge before whom the substantive case is pending.”

    The public notice said  that the long vacation will end on Friday, September 13, 2024.

     “The 2024/2025 Legal Year commences on Monday September 16, 2024. Notice is further given that the New Legal Year services will hold on Monday, the 29th day of September, 2024.”

  • CJN to judges: remain faithful to the law, Constitution

    CJN to judges: remain faithful to the law, Constitution

    • Ariwoola swears in 34 new justices

    Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Kayode Ariwoola has urged judicial officers to remain faithful to the law, the Constitution and their oath of office in the discharge of their responsibilities.

    He also warned them against unethical practices.

    Justice Ariwoola spoke yesterday at the oath taking ceremony of 22 new justices of the Appeal Court and 12 judges of the FCT High Court.

    He said: “Today’s ceremony is an indication of the perilous times that we are in, which has resulted in an upsurge in litigation. Several unfathomable crimes are being committed in the country, aside from the usual political matters that have made litigations to go on alarming rise.

    “No court in the land is spared of this litigation deluge, as it were. We are constantly on our toes and the dockets are ever increasing in response to the challenges of the time. This underscores the fact that Nigeria is fast emerging as a frontline crime-infested country that we all have to urgently curtail.

    “The enormous task of cleaning the Augean stable rests squarely on Your Lordships. So, you must hastily fasten your belt and roll up your sleeves to face the challenges head-on. In other words, you should hit the ground speeding at a supersonic velocity, and not just running. You must redouble your pace to catch up with the expectations of the sprawling community of litigants.

    “As judicial officers, you have a divine mandate on earth that you must discharge with unveiled honesty and sincerity. In the next couple of months, we shall be having two governorship elections in Edo and Ondo states. As usual, the courts will be besieged with plethora of petitions.

    “It is our statutory duty to hear all matters that come before us and adjudicate according to the laws of the land. We must not falter; and we must not tread the path of infamy.

    “Yes, it is true that we cannot please everyone through our actions and work, but with the right application of the law and the Constitution of the land, which we all have collectively pledged to uphold, we can go a long way to do those things that our conscience will be very proud of, and the generality of Nigerians will equally be happy about.

    Read Also: Makinde, Olubadan-Designate commission ultramodern palace

    “Every position we attain in life always avails us that unique opportunity to do something novel and impactful, especially if there was any previous act of wrongdoing or misapplication of discretion.”

    To the High Court judges, Ariwoola said: “We don’t need any fortuneteller to tell us that the times we are in, are quite perilous and ominous, too.

    “So, we seriously need judicial officers with the right character content that are equally calculative, honest, objective, dispassionate, and immensely humble, to take us to the highest pedestal of image and reputation rating.

    “Your appointments to the bench at this crucial and challenging time of our national history are not by accident but by the divine will of the Almighty God. You should be led by wisdom and guided by your conscience on this solemn voyage of self-actualisation.”

    Among the justices of the Appeal Court is Justice Olukayode Adeniyi who penalized the Department of State Services (DSS) for unlawfully detaining ex-Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Godwin Emefiele. Also among the 22 is Justice Eberechi Nyesom Wike, wife of the FCT minister.

  • ‘Judges deserve more respect than they’re getting’

    ‘Judges deserve more respect than they’re getting’

    ‘How my father shaped my aversion for injustice’

    Abdulkareem Musa comes from a family of lawyers. His father is Justice Yunusa Musa (rtd.) Three of his siblings are lawyers, while a younger one is studying law. Abdulkareem tells ELIZABETH EZE about his passion for justice, using law as a tool for development and his career aspirations.

    With several family members already practising law, Abdulkareem Musa was afforded the valuable opportunity to recognise early on that the legal profession offered a means to channel his passion for justice in a constructive and impactful manner.

    He said it was this lifelong drive to combat injustice that ultimately led him to the study and practice of law.

    “Now, as a lawyer, I have honed the ability to address societal ills through formal, structured, and civil channels.

    “I take great pride in the realisation that my legal knowledge and expertise can be leveraged not only to fight injustice but also to contribute to the development of government institutions and the strengthening of the rule of law,” he said.

    Musa is from Kogi State. His father, Justice Yunusa Musa, retired as a High Court Judge. His mother is serving as Director in Kogi State Civil Service.

    Despite being a Muslim, he attended Redeemer Nursery and Primary School, a Catholic institution in Kogi State.

    After his secondary education at the Global College Ojokodo, he applied to study law but was unable to secure immediate admission.

    Abdulkareem declined his father’s suggestion to attend a private university, preferring instead a public institution where he could freely engage in student activities.

    “Initially, I was admitted to Kogi State University to study English and Linguistics at one point. I applied for a change of course and was re-admitted to Political Science. I knew these weren’t my desired path.

    “I applied for another JAMB and was eventually admitted to study law. During my time at Kogi State University, I was actively involved in student politics, serving as class governor, club president, student union executive and eventually contesting for the position of SUG president which election was cancelled due to certain issues faced by the school at the time.”

    Musa attended the Nigerian Law School, Bwari Campus, where he was elected Financial Secretary of the Students’ Representatives Council.

    “Our Council effectively represented student interests while navigating the rigorous academic demands of the Law School.

    “My leadership was recognised with an award from the Council of Legal Education,” he said.

    He is pursuing a Masters Degree at Baze University, Abuja.

    Musa said he possessed a deep-seated aversion to injustice and a resolute determination to stand up for the fair treatment of myself and my peers since he was a young boy.              

    “I simply could not abide with the sight of bullies or the unfair treatment of others. This innate sense of justice and unwillingness to overlook wrongdoing often landed me in trouble, as I refused to remain silent in the face of perceived unfairness.

    “As I matured, I came to understand that my instinctive reactions had a name – a name that would come to define my professional aspirations: ‘injustice.’”

    For him, the journey has been a deeply fulfilling one, as he has transformed his youthful indignation at unfairness into a mature, principled, and multifaceted approach to effecting positive change through the legal system.

    He said it was this profound sense of purpose, rooted in his formative experiences, that continues to drive him in his pursuit of justice and aspiration to be a force for good in the world.

    Family of multiple lawyers

    “My dad has trained four of us to be lawyers and I still have a younger sibling in University studying law.

    “It is true that my father’s occupation as a lawyer had a formative influence on the trajectory of my own professional ambitions.

    “Observing the esteem and reverence with which he was held within his community instilled in me a sense that the legal profession was a noble and prestigious calling.

    “This early exposure, combined with my innate aversion to injustice, cultivated in me a desire to emulate my father’s accomplishments and to join the ranks of those who wield the power of the law to safeguard the rights and liberties of others.

    “The prospect of wielding such influence and authority, while simultaneously serving as a bulwark against societal ills, held a certain allure that was difficult to ignore.

    “Thus, my father’s example played a significant role in shaping my aspirations and fueling my determination to pursue a career in the legal field.”

    The pursuit of law was never a second option for him, but rather a calling that he was compelled to heed.

    However, as his worldview evolved, he became increasingly concerned with the pressing needs of nation-building, particularly in a growing country like Nigeria.

    Read Also: Mbaka endorses FeeFund, adjudges it best poverty antidote

    “I now firmly believe that the practical sciences – fields such as electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and agricultural sciences – hold immense potential to address the country’s most pressing challenges.

    “In contrast, many traditional arts-based courses may not be as immediately impactful in the current context.

    “Were the path of law not available to me, I would have enthusiastically embraced the opportunity to become an innovative scientist, driven by a desire to create tangible, life-changing solutions for the benefit of my fellow citizens.

    “The remarkable inventions that have transformed the world, from electricity to the internet, serve as a testament to the power of human ingenuity to uplift humanity,” he said.

    Law School experience

    Abdulkareem was given a leadership award in recognition of his service as Financial Secretary of the Student Representative Council.

    “For me, the true significance of my law school experience transcends the accolades or distinctions I may have received. Rather, it is the profound sense of purpose and the unwavering commitment to the rule of law that I have cultivated during that transformative period which stands as the truest measure of its impact.

    “This driving ethos, this steadfast dedication to the principles of justice and fairness, is what continues to guide my efforts and inspire me to leverage my legal expertise in service of the greater good.

    “It is this underlying motivation, this deep-seated conviction, that animates my work and propels me to champion the causes that matter most to the progress and upliftment of my society.

    “Awards and honours may come and go, but the values and aspirations that have been forged within me through my legal studies will remain the enduring legacy of that experience.”

    While his mother exhibited enthusiasm and celebrated his call to the bar, his father was more relaxed.

    Musa, however, took solace in the fact that it was his father’s unwavering support and guidance that enabled him to reach that juncture in the first place.

    He said he has profound gratitude for his father’s tireless efforts in ensuring his academic success, without which the call to the bar would not have been possible.

    “By adopting this understanding perspective, I have been able to maintain a harmonious relationship with my father, one built on mutual respect and an appreciation for the sacrifices he has made to pave the way for my professional journey.”

    Being son of a judge

    Growing up, Abdulkareem derived a sense of pride and importance from the fact that his father held the prestigious position of High Court Judge.

    However, as he matured and gained a deeper understanding of the realities of the judicial profession, his perspective on the matter evolved.

    “The restricted lifestyle that often accompanies being a judge no longer held the same appeal for me.

    “Furthermore, I observed that judges were not always afforded the level of dignity and respect I felt they deserved, particularly in relation to the other branches of government,” he said.

    Ultimately, he realised that the path of an advocate, with its inherent liberties, was more aligned with his personal and professional aspirations.

    Rather than follow in his father’s footsteps, he decided to pursue a career as a legal advocate – a choice that has allowed him to forge his own unique identity and professional trajectory.

    Most embarrassing moment in court

    In the legal environment, Abdulkareem was aware that there is an uncompromising standard when it comes to professional conduct in court.

    He was also aware that any behaviour that could potentially cause embarrassment would be seen as a reflection on the entire firm. Fortunately, he has not had any embarrassing moments during his court appearances.

    However, there was one particular incident that he found quite uncomfortable and disappointing.

    While appearing before a magistrate’s court in Nasarawa State, he sought to make a bail application for a client. In doing so, he began to cite relevant legal authorities in support of his argument.

    To his surprise, the other lawyers who were familiar with that particular court interrupted him and advised against citing authorities.

    They explained that the magistrate did not appreciate lawyers making such references during oral arguments and that it would only serve to anger him.

    “I found this practice to be rather strange and, frankly, quite mediocre. It went against my instincts as a legal advocate to thoroughly substantiate my arguments.

    “However, in the interest of serving my client’s best interests, I chose not to dwell on the unfortunate episode,” he said.

    Over the past five years, Abdulkareem has been privileged to gain extensive experience in the legal field.

    He has had the opportunity to be part of the legal teams handling high-profile cases.

    This includes representing approximately five gubernatorial candidates from various political parties in election petition cases, thanks to the guidance of his principal.

    He has also had the honour of being involved in the presidential election petition, where the firm was representing one of the presidential candidates and the party.

    While he enjoyed the thrill of winning many of these cases, he had also faced the reality of losing some.

    However, for him, the true joy lies not in the victory itself, but in the pursuit of justice.

    He told The Nation: “I approach every case with an unwavering commitment and a sense of purpose that borders on the evangelical.

    “My goal is not merely to win, as I recognize that there are numerous factors that can influence the outcome of a case.

    “Rather, I dedicate myself fully to ensuring that justice is served, regardless of the final verdict.

    “This mindset has allowed me to maintain a balanced perspective and a steadfast dedication to my craft.

    “Whether I emerge victorious or face defeat, I take immense pride in the work I do, knowing that I have given my utmost effort in service of my clients and the principles of the legal system.”

    Are lawyers liars?

    Musa said it was a common misconception that lawyers are liars, twisting the truth to serve their clients’ interests.

    This perception, he noted, misunderstands the fundamental role of lawyers in the legal system.

    “Lawyers do not deal in abstract truths, but rather, they work with the tangible facts presented as evidence.

    “The distinction between facts and truth is crucial. Facts are the building blocks of a legal case – the verifiable details and documentation that can be presented in a court of law. Truth, on the other hand, is a more elusive and subjective concept, open to interpretation and debate.”

    He contended that it is the court’s responsibility to determine the truth based on the facts presented by both sides.

    “A person may have a compelling case, but if they lack the supporting facts and evidence, the court may be compelled to rule against them – not due to the lawyer’s deceit, but simply because the facts did not align with the desired outcome.

    “This is where the importance of lawyers’ diligence and integrity comes into play.

    “Lawyers are tasked with gathering, organising, and presenting the facts in the most effective manner to ensure that the court can make a well-informed decision.

    “They are not arbiters of truth, but rather, facilitators of the legal process.

    “It is understandable for a person to feel frustrated if they lose a case, despite believing in the righteousness of their cause.

    “However, it is crucial to recognize that the legal system is predicated on the rigorous examination of facts, not on the personal convictions of the parties involved.”

    He further submitted: “Lawyers are not liars. They are advocates who work tirelessly to present the facts to the court.

    “The outcome of a legal case is not a reflection of the lawyer’s honesty, but rather, the court’s assessment of the available evidence.

    “By understanding this fundamental principle, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the role of lawyers in the pursuit of justice.”

    Should wig and gown be done away with?

    Abdulkareem noted that wig and gown have long been viewed as hallmarks of the legal profession, carrying with them a sense of tradition, formality, and gravitas.

    He said they serve to distinguish lawyers and judges, reinforcing the solemnity and importance of legal proceedings.

    “In many common law jurisdictions, this attire has been worn for centuries, cementing it as a core part of legal culture and identity.

    “However, a Justice of the Supreme Court’s perspective seems to suggest that maintaining these traditional vestments may not be fully suited to Nigeria’s unique legal landscape and cultural context.”

    He also noted that there is an argument that the wig and gown, as relics of the country’s colonial past, may not resonate as strongly with modern Nigerian lawyers and the citizens they serve.

    “Musa said: Adapting the professional dress code to better reflect Nigeria’s own traditions and sensibilities could help make the legal system feel more accessible and relevant to the populace.

    “Ultimately, I believe this is an issue that would benefit from careful consideration and broad consultation within the Nigerian legal community.

    “There are merits to both retaining the wig and gown and exploring alternative, culturally appropriate attire.

    “The key is to strike a balance that upholds the gravitas of the legal profession while also fostering a sense of connection between lawyers and the citizens they serve.

    “It’s a complex issue, but one worthy of robust debate and, potentially, meaningful reform.

    Law professor, or SAN or both?

    Abdulkareem said he was deeply committed to becoming a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN).

    According to him, this esteemed rank can be likened to a “priesthood of justice, which holds a profound allure for me.”

    He added: “It represents the pinnacle of the legal profession and the opportunity to make an indelible mark on the legal landscape of our nation.

    “I am utterly devoted to this pursuit. It aligns perfectly with my passion for the law and commitment to the administration of justice.

    “The rank of a SAN demands the highest levels of legal acumen, ethical integrity, and an unyielding dedication to upholding the rule of law.

    “It is a mantle that I am determined to don it, for it will allow me to utilize my skills and expertise in the most impactful way, serving as a beacon of justice and a champion for the rights of the people.”

    He said the prospect of becoming a law professor, while certainly intriguing, is simply a distraction from my primary goal. 

    He remarked that the role of a professor holds its own merits, but for now, he has his eyes firmly set on the “priesthood of justice”.

    He also did not entirely dismiss the possibility of pursuing a professorship at a later stage in my career.

    “The wealth of experience and the depth of knowledge that I would gain could indeed afford me the luxury of time and the opportunity to share my expertise with the next generation of legal scholars and practitioners.

    “Such a transition could serve to further cement my legacy and contribute to the ongoing development of the legal profession in Nigeria,” Musa said.

    He said, however, that his unwavering focus remains on the path to becoming a Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

    “This is the goal that consumes my thoughts, drives my actions, and fuels my determination.

    “I believe in God and I trust in his direction and timing.”

    Would he like to marry a lawyer?

    Musa said: “The prospect of getting married to a fellow lawyer holds a certain appeal for me.

    “As I contemplate my future and the path that lies ahead, I believe that forging a union with a partner who shares my passion for the law and the pursuit of justice could indeed prove to be a tremendous asset.

    “I believe that a marriage to a lawyer would allow for a deeper understanding and appreciation of the unique challenges and demands that come with a career in the legal profession.

    “A fellow lawyer would be better equipped to provide the emotional support, the practical guidance, and the intellectual camaraderie that I may require as I navigate the complexities of my chosen path.

    “Furthermore, I believe that the shared language and perspective of the law would foster a level of communication and synergy that could truly elevate the glory of our union.

    “The ability to engage in substantive discussions, to collaborate on legal matters, and to draw upon each other’s expertise could serve to enrich our relationship and our individual pursuits.”

    He, however, acknowledged that his aspirations in this regard have been subjected to the divine dictates that guide his life.

    He said he has subjected his search for a life partner to the will of God, for he believes that the divine plan for his life will ultimately lead him to the individual who is truly meant to be his companion and support on this journey.

  • Our judges have gone gaga again!

    Our judges have gone gaga again!

    What IS happening in Kano is sickening. It all began last Thursday when the House of Assembly dissolved the five emirates in the ancient city created by the immediate past administration of Abdullahi Ganduje. His successor Abba Yusuf immediately signed the bill into law, ending the four-year tenure of the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado Bayero, the main target of the repealed law and the four other emirs who emerged from the balkanised Kano Emirate. Yusuf immediately brought back Muhammadu Sanusi as Kano emir. Sanusi has since taken over the Rumfa Palace; Bayero is in Nasarawa, which hosts what has been described as a mini palace.

    Read Also: Fed Govt, Labour to resume minimum wage talks Friday

    The courts have waded in the matter giving conflicting orders which have complicated issues. A court restrained the governor from sacking Bayero and others; another of coordinate power gave its own order endorsing his action to dissolve the five emirates. The dingdong has continued with both parties going to the courts of their choice to obtain orders favourable to them.

    The courts are supposed to know better than to indulge the parties. But, rather than do what is right and proper, they are wittingly giving conflicting orders. Why are some of our judges like this, despite all the warnings about the use and abuse of interim injunctions? It is only trite for a judge not to give an interim order where one has already been granted by his brother-judge, whether or not the first judge was right to do so. No interim injunction by one judge can cancel the other by his brother-judge since they are of equal status. These judges should stop giving the judiciary a bad name and halt this madness, which all started in 1993, now!

  • Befitting pay for judges

    Befitting pay for judges

    • Review of remuneration is the first step in rebuilding the third arm of government

    The move by President Bola Tinubu to improve the welfare package for judicial officers is commendable. Since 2008 when the emoluments were last reviewed, the judicial officers have used every opportunity to call for a fresh look into their case. However viewed, a monthly salary of less than half a million Naira for the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) who heads the third arm of government is unjustifiable.

    That the previous government was unable to grant them decent wages even after government workers’ salaries had been enhanced is an indication that successive governments had little regard for them.

    The expeditious treatment given the executive bill on the matter by the National Assembly, too, is commendable. It is an indication that all Nigerians are agreed that the judges are being poorly treated.

    Over the years, handling the judges has badly affected the administration of justice. With galloping inflation and society’s higher expectations from the men and women saddled with adjudication of disputes, as well as interpretation of the laws, standards have constantly nosedived. Yet, the remuneration has made it difficult to attract the calibre of professionals to the Bench even as judges are not permitted to engage in other practices.

    The Judiciary has come under heavy battering in recent years over real or perceived miscarriage of justice.

     This has been more pronounced in election seasons. It is time to cleanse the system by ensuring that the best available in the public and private sectors are drawn to cross-fertilise ideas on the Bench. The willing academics and senior advocates must be brought on board in a bid to ensure that the society once again has respect for the Judiciary as repository of moral rectitude.

    No society can grow and attract respect from foreign investors or even retain existing ones unless there is speedy and acceptable dispensation of justice.

    Read Also: House Bill raises service conditions for judges, others

    Now that the Federal Government has expunged the judges from the general wage structure, other measures should complement the efforts. Training, locally and externally, should be stepped up for those who have been saddled with the task of keeping criminals out of the public space.

    While appearing before the Senate recently, the Chief of Defence Staff, General Christopher Musa, had said the justice sector contributed immensely to the festering insecurity in the land. He said insurgents and bandits are usually released into the society on bail as soon as they are arraigned in court.

    The grundnorm makes provision for a National Judicial Council (NJC) that sees to maintenance of discipline in the arm of government. It is time for the council to sanitise the stable. The Judiciary is too central to good governance to be left to rot.

    All those involved in judicial reform and administration should see this as an opportunity to reinvent the Judiciary in a way that would make it the pride of all.

    As soon as the bill is passed to the presidency, we expect the President to sign it into law, and the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) to do the needful in liaison with the Ministry of Budget Affairs and the Federal Ministry of Finance in urgently perfecting the papers. Where supplementary appropriation is needed, this should be prepared and passed to the National Assembly immediately. We expect that this would elicit the confidence of all in the Nigerian Judiciary.

  • ‘How women judges can thrive’

    ‘How women judges can thrive’

    Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State has charged women judges to identify obstacles that hinder women’s advancement and fashion strategies to overcome them.

     He urged them to carve out a future where women in the legal profession would stand on equal footing with their male counterparts.

    Sanwo-Olu gave the charge while addressing the 1st South-West Zonal Workshop of the National Association of Women Judges of Nigeria (NAWJN) held at Marriot Hotel, GRA, Ikeja.

    The theme was: “Breaking Leadership Barriers for Women in Legal Profession”.

    The governor, who was represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Mrs Bimbola  Salu-Hundeyin, expressed joy that Nigerian women judges compete favorably and effectively with their counterparts globally in the dispensation of their sacred duties as members of the hallowed inner bar.

    He celebrated the women judges particularly in the South West of Nigeria.

    Governor Sanwo-Olu also commended Justice of the Supreme Court,  Kudirat Kekere-Ekun for sustaining the platform for women judges to confer and  build structure that would sustain the legal instrument of the state and the country.

    “Your dedication and commitment to advancing women leadership in the legal profession are truly commendable and I am confident that this conference will provide robust solutions and forge new and workable  strategies to bring about lasting and tangible change that you have constantly desired and would live forever in our lives”, he said.

    The Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Kazeem Alogba, in his remarks, noted that the female gender are becoming more successful and advancing in the legal profession.

     To buttress his position, he stated that during the just concluded ‘Call to Bar’ held March 7 in Abuja, he received into the Nigerian Bar, the Overall Best Student of the Year from the Nigerian Law School (NLS) for this year, one Lawal Aminat Odunayo, a young woman.

    He said shealso emerged as the Best Promising Student of the Year as well as the Best Female Student in Civil Litigation.

    Earlier, Justice Kekere-Ekun, who is the President of NAWJN, in her opening address, remarked that there is still much work to be done notwithstanding that the country has come a long way in terms of women achieving leadership positions in the legal profession.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun noted that there are still many challenges inhibiting women from reaching the zenith of their careers which she listed to include domestic impediments, difficulty in maintaining a work/life balance, lack of support in the home, working conditions that are not favourable to women, such as frequent postings of women with

    young families, gender bias — belief that certain positions are more  suited to the male gender, lack of mentorship programmes, to name a few.

    She pointed out that women have been exceptionally blessed by God with innate skills and the ability to multi-task, which can enhance and support nation building.

    Read Also: Justice for SGBV victims: CSOs, Lagos judges, converge

    “It is therefore imperative to recognize the invaluable need for the participation of women in policy making and to strive to ensure their inclusivity in the promotion of policies that are gender sensitive and which provide greater access to justice.

    She said that the International Association of Women Judges had partnered with Co-Impact, a philanthropic collaborative fund to develop and implement a multi-year programme to enable, support and promote sustainable leadership pathways for women in leadership in the Global South.

    She said the association is also working with affiliate Associations in five countries (Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Mexico and the Philippines) to address and work out strategies to overcome the barriers confronting women in leadership in the profession adding that the initiative is called Women In Leadership In Law (WILIL).

    She said it was for this reason that the executives of NAWJN decided to hold workshops in the six geo-political zones of the country to beam a spotlight on these challenges and to also proffer solutions that are uniquely suited to our own environment.

    She hoped that the series of workshops will provide a roadmap that will lead to the enhancement of women in leadership in the Judiciary and other fields of endeavour, which is expected to positively impact high level decision making and overall best practices within the profession.