Tag: Justice Nyako

  • BREAKING: Justice Nyako resumes Nnamdi Kanu’s trial amid recusal dispute

    BREAKING: Justice Nyako resumes Nnamdi Kanu’s trial amid recusal dispute

    The trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), resumed on Monday before Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court. This comes after a dispute over her earlier decision to recuse herself from the case.

    Kanu’s trial was initially stalled on September 24, 2024, when Justice Nyako recused herself following the IPOB leader’s direct declaration of lost confidence in her handling of the case.

    However, Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, John Tsoho, returned the case file to Justice Nyako, stating that Kanu’s request must be made formally through a motion on notice.

    Read Also: Deputy Speaker begs Tinubu to release Nnamdi Kanu

    During Monday’s proceedings, Justice Nyako reiterated that her recusal had not been formally accepted by the Chief Judge.

    She advised Kanu’s defence team, led by Aloy Ejimakor, to submit a written application if they still sought her withdrawal.

    Details shortly…

  • BREAKING: Chief Judge directs Justice Nyako to continue Kanu’s trial

    BREAKING: Chief Judge directs Justice Nyako to continue Kanu’s trial

    The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho has directed that the case file in Nnamdi Kanu’s treason trial should be returned to Justice Binta Nyako to continue hearing the case.

    Justice Nyako recused herself from the case on September 24 after Kanu, the self acclaimed leader of the separatist group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), demanded that she hands off the case, claiming he no longer has confidence in the judge’s ability to ensure fair hearing.

    It was learnt that Justice Tsoho directed that Justice Nyako should continue to preside over the case on the condition that Kanu should file a formal application, supported with an affidavit, detailing reasons why he wants his trial to be conducted before another judge.

    By Justice Tsoho’s condition, the prosecution is also required to respond to Kanu’s application, following which Justice Nyako will  hear the application and give a ruling, deciding whether or not to withdraw.

    Justice Tsoho’s condition, it was gathered, was to prevent a repeat of what happened in the money laundering case involving the former Governor of Benue State, Gabriel Suswam, in which the Court of Appeal overruled Justice Ahmed Mohammed, who had withdrawn from the case.

    The Court of Appeal was of the view that Justice Mohammed did not withdraw properly because no proceedings were conducted for parties to address the court on whether or not the judge should withdraw.

    Justice Nyako’s withdrawal on September 24 made it the third time a judge would be abandoning the case at the instance of the defendant 

    Kanu first appeared before the Federal High Court on December 23, 2015 in relation to the case.

    He was taken, along with some others, before Justice Mohammed (now a Justice of the Court of Appeal).

    Before any steps could be taken in the case, Kanu objected to being tried before the judge, claiming he was not sure he could get justice. 

    The judge subsequently withdrew from the case, following which it was reassigned to a new judge.

    On September 26, 2016, Kanu and his then co-defendants were taken  before Justice Tsoho (who was then the second most senior judge of the court).

    Read Also: UPDATED: Justice Nyako withdraws from Nnamdi Kanu’s trial

    Justice Tsoho later withdrew from the case following a petition by Kanu’s lawyers to the National Judicial Council (NJC).

    In the petition, Kanu’s lawyers accused the judge of making conflicting decisions in an application by the prosecution to be allowed to shield its witnesses from public view, which they claimed would not guaranty fairness and justice for the defendants.

    Ruling on September 26, 2016, Justice Tsoho (who is now the court’s Chief Judge) returned the case file to the then Chief Judge, Justice Abdu Kafarati.

    The case was subsequently reassigned to Justice Nyako in 2016.

  • UPDATED: Justice Nyako withdraws from Nnamdi Kanu’s trial

    UPDATED: Justice Nyako withdraws from Nnamdi Kanu’s trial

    Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja has withdrawn from the treason trial of the self-acclaimed leader of the separatist group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.

    Justice Nyako announced her withdrawal on Tuesday shortly after Kanu demanded that the judge recuse herself from his trial.

    At the mention of the case on Tuesday, September 24, Kanu’s lawyer, Alloy Ejimakor urged the court to postpone the planned commencement of trial, claiming that his client was denied the opportunity to adequately prepare for his defence.

    But, before Ejimakor could conclude his submission, Kanu rose from where he sat in the dock and told his lawyer to sit down.

    Kanu told his lawyer: “Sit down! I say you should sit down.” Then, turning to the judge, he said: “My lord, I have no confidence in this court anymore and I ask you to recuse yourself because you did not abide by the decision of the Supreme Court.

    “I can understand it if the DSS (Department of State Services) refuse to obey a court order, but for this court to refuse to obey an order of the Supreme Court is regrettable.

    “I am asking you to recuse yourself from this case,” Kanu said.

    Prosecuting lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) urged the court to ignore Kanu and proceed with the trial.

    Awomolo noted that contrary to Kanu’s claim, the Supreme Court ordered that the defendant (Kanu) should be tried on the seven counts left in the 11 counts contained in the original charge on which he was first arraigned.

    He said: “The Justices (of the Supreme Court) ordered this court to proceed with the hearing of the charge against the defendant.

    “My lord, you should not recuse yourself based on this mere observation, which does not have anything to do with the Supreme Court.

    “It is an incompetent observation. We urge this court to proceed with the hearing.”

    Kanu, again, stood up and held out a document he claimed was the subsisting judgment of the Supreme Court.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Justice Nyako withdraws from Kanu’s trial

    Without seeking and obtaining the judge’s permission, Kanu proceeded to read a portion of the document where he said the Supreme Court found that actions of the trial court in the case “rendered the impartiality of the judge suspect.”

    Kanu said: “But my lord, you know that I love you. It is just that this court is allowing the prosecution to railroad me into a trial that is at variance with every provision of the Constitution.”

    The defendant then sat down, following which Justice Nyako expressed displeasure about his conduct.

    Justice Nyako subsequently announced her decision to withdraw from the case, saying: “I hereby recuse myself and remit the case file back to the Chief Judge.”