Tag: Kabiru Sokoto

  • ‎Boko Haram: Kabiru Sokoto accuses FG of frustrating his appeal

    ‎Boko Haram: Kabiru Sokoto accuses FG of frustrating his appeal

    Convicted Boko Haram member, Kabiru Umar (also known as Kabiru Sokoto) has accused agents of the Federal Government of frustrating his efforts to appeal his conviction and sentence.

    Sokoto was on December 20, 2013 sentenced to life imprisonment by Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, Abuja in connection with 2011 Christmas day bomb blast that killed about 44 persons and wounded 75 others at St. Theresa’s Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State.

    Justice Ademola had, in his judgment, held that he was satisfied that the Federal Government, successfully established the culpability of the convict beyond every reasonable doubt, noting that Umar had in two earlier separate confessional statements, admitted that he had prior knowledge of the attack.

    The judge noted that Sokoto never showed any remorse for his actions throughout the trial, and described him (Sokoto) as “a pathological liar with no regards for the truth.”

    Dissatisfied, Sokoto filed a notice of appeal before the Court of Appeal, Abuja.

    In a fresh motion on notice filed before the Federal High Court, Abuja by his lawyer, Sheriff Okoh, Sokoto alleged the Comptroller of Prisons and his men have made it impossible to access his lawyer, to enable him perfect his appeal process.

    The motion, which has The Comptroller General of Prisons (CGP) and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) as respondents, Sokoto, now being held at the Kirikiri Maximum Security Prison, Lagos, wants an order compelling the respondents to allow him access to his lawyer.

    He also seeks a declaration that the respondents’s alleged decision to deny him access to his lawyer was a violation of his right to fair hearing, right to counsel and access to justice.

    In a supporting affidavit deposed to by Okoh, it was alleged that the several applications to the CGP by Sokoto’s lawyer for opportunity to see him had always been turned down.

    “We have made several person contacts with the 1st defendant (CGP), his men: S. N. Nwanchukwu (PSO), E. O. Ogundele) DCG) among others, at the Nigeria Prisons headquarters, Abuja in a bid to persuade them to permit us to see the applicant, but they kept making us indulge in fruitless returns for approvals from the 2nd respondent (AGF) that has not come for over two years.

    “Wherefore, we verily believe that their actions are aimed at ensuring that the applicant’s appeal of his conviction and sentence continues to be frustrated in perpetuity.

    “The applicant’s appeal before the Court of Appeal is being delayed as a result of the conduct of the 1st respondent and men under his command and supervision,” Okoh said.

    Thursday, when the case was called, the trial judge, Justice Nnamdi Dimgba observed that there was no evidence in court’s file that the respondents were served with processes (court documents) in the case.

    He directed the applicant’s lawyer to ensure service of the processes on the respondents and return on February 4 for the hearing of the motion.

     

     

  • Convicted Kabiru Sokoto begs Jonathan for pardon

    Convicted Kabiru Sokoto begs Jonathan for pardon

    Convicted Boko Haram member, Kabiru Umar (aka Kabiru Sokoto) has appealed to President Goodluck Jonathan for pardon, promising to assist the government in its efforts to end the activities of the now outlawed sect.

     

    Umar was convicted on a two-count terrorism charge by a Federal High Court in Abuja on December 20 last year and sentenced to life imprisonment.

    The court found him guilty of facilitating the commission of terrorism acts and concealing information from security agencies on the December 25, 2011 bombing of St Theresa’s Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State.

    In a letter to the President, written on his behalf by his lawyer, Sheriff Okoh, Umar said he was innocent of the offences for which he was convicted.

    He faulted the process leading to his conviction and has also appealed the High Court judgment before the Court of Appeal, Abuja.

    The letter reads:

    “Your Excellency sir, an innocent man was convicted by the court on the date aforementioned. It is for this singular reason that we are applying to you for Presidential pardon in the circumstance pursuant to your exclusive legitimate constitutional powers as enshrined in your golden conscience and under Section 175(a) and (b) of the Constitution.

    “Your Excellency sir, we are applying for respite and pardon for the convicted felon Kabiru Umar (alias Kabiru Sokoto) because we have absolute faith in your compassion and highest sense of fairness, equity and justice first as a God-fearing man and next, as the leader of the most compassionate nation on earth.

    “Had Kabiru Sokoto been sentenced in open court for the corporate acts of Boko Haram as a terrorist organsiation, we would not have spared a thought to make this application, but he was sentenced alone for acts committed by other members of Boko Haram (an organization that was only proscribed after his arrest, detention and the making of his no-case submission before the Federal High Court, Abuja division.)

    “Your Excellency, we vow to reach out beyond the imagination and work with you in resolving the Boko Haram imbroglio, with the firm belief that no quarrel of brotherhood is eternal. We shall undertake this national task for the pleasure of God Almighty, believing in His divine will for our peaceful, united, symbiotic and mutual coexistence as brothers and sisters under a fair and just leader

  • Kabiru Sokoto relocated as inmates riot in Kuje

    Kabiru Sokoto relocated as inmates riot in Kuje

    A riot broke out on Tuesday night in Kuje Prison, leading to the relocation of a terror convict, Kabiru Sokoto.

    Security has been tightened around Charles Okah, one of the October 1, 2010, bomb suspects.

    The whereabouts of Kabiru Sokoto was unknown yesterday.

    The prison authority, which was not ready to disclose the location of Sokoto, said normalcy had been restored to Kuje Yard.

    Justice Ademola Adeniyi, on December 20, last year, found Sokoto guilty of terrorism and murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

    He was alleged to be the mastermind of the 2011 Christmas Day bombing at St. Theresa Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State.

    Sokoto confessed at the trial that he was member of the Shura Council of the Boko Haram sect.

    It was gathered that the riot broke out, following a protest over alleged maltreatment of inmates.

    The rumpus, which started from single cells, was also said to be in connection with poor access to medical care.

    Sources said some inmates were unhappy at the alleged deteriorating ‘mental’ health of Okah.

    There were, however, speculations that the riot was an alleged attempt to free Sokoto.

    A source at the Nigerian Prison Service (NPS), said: “There was a security breach at Kuje Medium Prison on Tuesday night.Inmates were protesting the alleged ill-treatment of Sokoto and Okah’s poor medical care, which almost caused a jailbreak.

    “The crisis was also fuelled by the alleged deteriorating mental health of Charles Okah, which was linked to a drug administered on him by the medical personnel. The drug is said to be ‘Sodium Valporate.’ But the medical team denied giving Okah such a drug.

    “When the rumour went round that Kabiru Sokoto and Okah were being maltreated, it became an issue in the prison yard.

    “The prison management suspected Kabiru Sokoto to have masterminded the riot. The suspicion bordered on a likely plot to free Sokoto by some members of Boko Haram.”

    Deputy Controller of Prisons (DCP) and the Public Relations Officer (PRO), Ope Fatinikun, confirmed the crisis.

    But he was evasive about the whereabouts of Kabiru Sokoto.

    Fatinikun said: “The government knows there will be a problem, that is why we were employed. And the most important thing is that the problem in Kuje Prison has been solved.

    “In an enclosed society there will always be that kind of problem. Even in your own community there are problems. Kabiru Sokoto has been sentenced to life imprisonment and he will be trying to cause trouble but he has been put under control.”

    Although Fatinikun did not give details, he admitted that Kabiru Sokoto had been relocated.

    He added: “”The controller-general has the power to move any convicted inmate to a place that is safe. You should expect such a thing in an enclosed society

    “Where did he move to? It is our internal affairs. For security reasons, I will not be able to tell you where he was moved to.

    “We are preventing a reccurrence. This is the only one you know, what of those ones you did not know in other prisons across the country. It is not a new thing. I was there to ensure that the situation is brought under control.

    “We have learnt our lessons and the Controller-General, Zakari Ohinoyi, has directed that security be tightened across prison formations in the country. It is not only in the northern part of the country.

    “For security reasons, I will not be able to tell you but we have put in place measures to combat further Boko Haram attacks.

    “We lost close to 50 officers last year to Boko Haram attacks. And five prisons were affected. I can assure you that, God willing, there will be no attack on prisons this year.”

  • Son of a Bitch

    On December 21, 1988, that is, a quarter of a century ago, a Pan Am Flight 103 with 243 passengers and 16 crew members exploded into shreds in the evening skies above Lockerbie, Scotland. In a twinkle of an eye, all the people on board including 35 students of Syracuse University, New York State and 11 more on the ground, perished.        Last Saturday, memorial events took place simultaneously in Britain and the United States to mark the 25th anniversary of the tragic bombing which devastated hundreds of families on both sides of the Atlantic. The day was marked with services of remembrance at Westminster Abbey, London and at Dryfesdale Church, Lockerbie. Services were also held at the Pan Am 103 Memorial Arcade in Arlington National Cemetery and at Syracuse University in New York State.

    The Lockerbie terrorist attack has so far remained the deadliest act of terrorism on British soil and probably surpassed by the September 11, 2001 terrorists’ attack on the World Trade Center in New York, the United States of America. And back home in Nigeria, today’s Christmas day marks the third anniversary of the 2010 bombing of St. Theresa’s Catholic Church at Madalla, Niger State. The bombing of the church, which was packed full of worshippers at the ceremonial service to commemorate the birth of Jesus Christ, led to the death of over 44 persons, while about 75 others sustained serious injuries.

    Perhaps, nothing can be greater than the fact that the anniversary of Madalla bombing is being marked this year with the conviction of a major character in that unfortunate episode. Last Friday, barely five days to the third anniversary of that gruesome Christmas Day massacre, a Federal High Court in Abuja slammed a life sentence on Kabiru Umar, also known as Kabiru Sokoto, the mastermind of the act.

    Umar was first arraigned on April 19, this year, on a two-count charge bordering on terrorism. He was accused of training over 500 men on how to manufacture and detonate Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) and having prior knowledge that the Boko Haram sect planned to bomb the church on Christmas day, but failed to disclose it to any law enforcement officer. He was also accused of having facilitated the perpetration of terrorist acts, including planting bombs at the Police headquarters and some government organisations between 2007 and 2012, at Mabira Sokoto, Sokoto State. Throughout his eight-month trial, Umar’s puerile defence was that the government failed to establish a prima facie case capable of warranting his trial and conviction.

    But the presiding Judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola, thought otherwise. While delivering judgment in the case, the Judge held that the court found as a fact, the statement that Umar was the mastermind of the 2010 Christmas day bombing, adding that he did not controvert the evidence brought against him.

    Justice Ademola further held that the court agreed with the prosecution that the case against the accused person had been proved beyond reasonable doubt, adding that, the two statements of the accused person were admitted in evidence without opposition from the defence counsel.

    Justice Ademola held that the accused was a “pathological liar,” who deceived the court that he did not understand English Language when it was evident before the court that Umar had four credits in the West African School Certificate Examination (WASCE) and also worked as a Laboratory Scientist. The judge also faulted the attitude of the accused during the trial, adding that he did not show any remorse. Accordingly, Justice Ademola sentenced Umar to life imprisonment on the first count and 10 years on the second count, which should run consecutively.

    The judge also urged the security agencies to investigate the circumstances surrounding Umar’s arrest in the Borno State Governor’s Lodge in Asokoro, Abuja.

    He said members of Boko Haram had permeated all levels of government. According to him: “Indeed, the police have a duty to investigate and bring other persons involved to book. It is imperative that security forces finish off this investigation so that we can get to the root of this.”

    Umar was first arrested by the Police in Abuja on January 14, 2012 at the Borno State Governor’s Lodge after arriving at the Lodge in the company of a Flight Lieutenant in the Nigerian Air Force and one Ibrahim, who had sought and got approval by officers in charge of the lodge to spend the night there.

    Ibrahim had allegedly called the lodge officer who was away in Maiduguri, seeking to be given a room for the night, which he was obliged. But he came to the lodge that Friday evening along with Umar and the Air Force man. Security agents, who had been on Umar’s trail since he was declared wanted, traced him to the lodge that night and arrested him.

    Surprisingly, Umar was declared missing from Police custody two days later. His escape raised eyebrow in security circle. The police later came up with an explanation that he escaped when he was being taken to his home at Abaji, a suburb of the Federal Capital Territory, for a search by Zakari Biu, a Commissioner of Police. The police had said that a gang of youths flagged down the vehicle conveying Umar as it was heading for the Ona of Abaji’s palace, thereby creating chaos during which he escaped.

    His controversial escape from police custody was one of the factors that ultimately led to the removal of Hafiz Ringim, the then Inspector-General of Police, while Zakari Biu, who was in charge of the operation that led to Umar’s escape, was suspended from the Force on Tuesday, January 17, 2012. Biu was made to face an orderly room trial before he was later thrown out of the force with ignominy while a nationwide manhunt for Umar’s apprehension was declared. This paid off when he was later re-arrested in Taraba State by operatives of the State Security Service.

    Getting the conviction of Umar within a record time of eight months is a good sign that justice can still be speedily delivered in a country replete with various acts of injustice or where justice is hard to come by. Therefore, this judgment is a commendation for both the law enforcement agencies and the judiciary, which has again proved itself as a bastion of hope for the common man, particularly the victims of the Madalla senseless bombing. It is hoped that this judgment, although coming three years after the savagery was committed, would provide the necessary impetus for security agents to work hard to unmask those responsible for the killing of innocent Nigerians through terrorist acts wherever they may be.

    However, beyond bringing Umar to book, security agents should work assiduously to bring other perpetrators of this heinous crime to justice. It is also important for the government to go deep to unravel the root cause of this growing satanic behaviour, which has almost turned the country upside down. Just like many people have proffered in the past, beneath the insurgency that has continued to rattle the country and give it a bad name in the comity of nations, is endemic poverty which has eaten deep into the fabric of the nation.

    Of course, bad governance and inequitable distribution of our common patrimony may have bred this untoward situation through social disequilibrium. Suffice it to say that our policy makers need to tackle corruption, which is the bedrock of our national malaise, if this generation and generations yet unborn will not be permanently condemned to perdition.

    The case of Umar, who was arrested right inside a Governor’s Lodge in the company of a serving military officer, underscores the collaboration of some unscrupulous security agents with those who are determined to wreak havoc on the corporate existence of the country. Furthermore, the role of the Zakari Bius of this world in Umar’s escape from custody shows that really, as President Goodluck Jonathan admitted sometimes ago and this column pointed out last week, there are indeed moles within the country’s security apparatuses. This is dangerous for our national existence. We need to rise up as a government and as individuals to protect our country from the vagabonds who are hell bent on pulling us down.

  • 2011 Christmas Day bombing: Kabiru Sokoto bags life imprisonment

    2011 Christmas Day bombing: Kabiru Sokoto bags life imprisonment

    The mastermind of the 2011 Christmas Day bombing of St Theresa Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State, Kabiru Umar, was yesterday sentenced to life imprisonment for the mass killing.

    About 44 worshippers died in the bombing.

    The Federal High Court, Abuja similarly convicted the man also known as Kabiru Sokoto for complicity in plots to bomb the Police Headquarters, Sokoto and some other strategic public institutions in the state.

    He got life imprisonment for the first count and 10 years for the second. He was arraigned on a two-count charge on 19 April this year by the Federal Government.

    Umar, a 38-year old father of two and an Islamic scholar, was charged with belonging to an illegal organisation and facilitating the commission of terrorism act by aiding “his boys” in the plan to bomb the Police Headquarters, Sokoto State and other public buildings, an offence punishable under Section 15(2) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act.

    In count two, he was charged with failure to inform security agencies, “within reasonable and practicable time,” of the plan to bomb the Madalla Catholic Church, having had prior knowledge of the plan, an offence punishable under Section 7(1) of the Terrorism Prevention Act (TPA) 2011.

    Tragedy struck on the fateful day as Boko Haram members rammed a car packed with explosives into the gates of the church on December 25, 2011.

    In convicting Umar, Justice Ademola Adeniyi upheld the confessional statement which Umar made to his interrogators in which he admitted knowledge of the crimes.

    The confessional statement, the court said, was supported by the statement of one of Umar’s boys, who was arrested before him, and the evidence by a security operative, who investigated the case.

    Justice Adeniyi held that although the accused person, in his testimony, attempted to deny his earlier confessional statement, the statement by one of his boys, which contained information that aided security agents to arrest Umar, showed that the statement was credible.

    He described Umar as a pathological liar, who had not been a witness of truth in the case.

    The judge noted that Umar, who claimed not to understand English Language, which prompted the court to procure an interpreter, admitted in the course of trial to have been trained as a laboratory technician and passed four papers in the School Certificate Examination at credit level, having written the examinations in English.

    Justice Adeniyi, who noted that Umar was arrested in the Borno State Governor’s Lodge in Abuja, urged the police to fully investigate that aspect of the case to ascertain whether the Boko Haram sect to which Umar belongs could be enjoying the support of some influential personalities.

    Before sentencing him, the judge noted that Umar did not show remorse throughout the trial.

    He said: ”The character of the accused person is that of a person who seems not to have respect for the truth. He showed no remorse. He lied that he cannot speak English even when that is not true.

    “The accused is hereby sentenced to life imprisonment in relation to the first count. In respect of the second count, the accused person is sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. Both sentences are to run consecutively,” the judge held.

    Shortly after his arrest in 2012, Umar escaped from his police guards in Kogi State but was arrested later in Taraba State.

  • Xmas Day bomber Kabiru Sokoto gets life sentence

    Xmas Day bomber Kabiru Sokoto gets life sentence

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced Kabir Umar, alias “Kabiru Sokoto’’ to life in prison for the bombing of St. Theresa’s Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger.

    Justice Adeniyi Ademola, who gave the sentence on Friday, found Umar guilty on the two-count charge against him.

    He said “the prosecution has proved their case beyond reasonable doubt in the two-count charge. Umar is guilty as charged.’’

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the judge held that the convict belonged to an illegal organisation, Boko Haram, and facilitated terrorist acts intended to bomb the Police Headquarters in Sokoto State.

    He also held that Umar had information about the planning and bombing of St. Theresa’s Catholic Church, Madalla, on December 25, 2011 but failed to disclose such to security agencies.

    The first charge is punishable with life imprisonment under Section 15(2) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Act 2004, and the second charge attracted 10 years imprisonment under Section 7(1) under Terrorism Act, 2011.

    The judge described the convict as a “pathological liar’’ who did not “show remorse’’ throughout the trial, saying “the convict has no respect for truth.’’

    He commended the prosecution counsel for a job well done, as well as the Department of State Service (DSS) for the diligence in investigating the matter and bringing the trial to a conclusion.

    The judge, however, noted that the police had not been able to investigate the circumstance that brought Umar to the Borno Governor’s Lodge in Abuja, where he was arrested on January 14, 2012.

    He urged them to investigate the matter with a view to bringing to justice whoever was involved in helping Umar to hide in the lodge, no matter how highly placed.

     

     

  • Court rules on Xmas Day bombing November 7

    Court rules on Xmas Day bombing November 7

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed November 7 for judgment in the trial of Kabiru Umar (Kabiru Sokoto), charged with complicity in the 2011 Christmas day bombing of St. Theresa’s Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State.

    About 40 worshippers died, while several others sustained varied degrees of injury in the incident.

    Justice Ademola Adeniyi chose the date for judgment on Monday after parties adopted their final written addresses.

    Lead prosecution lawyer, Chioma Onuegbu, urged the court to ignore the defendant’ argument and uphold the evidence and submissions of the prosecution in convicting the accused.

    She argued that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and that the guilt of the accused has been established through his confessional statement; circumstantial evidence and eye witness account.

    Onuegbu argued that the voluntary statement of an accused was sufficient to lead to his conviction.

    She urged the court to attach weight to the accused’s confessional statement.

    Onuegbu told the court that the accused did not deny making the statement, which she said, collaborated the one made by the officials of the State Security Service (SSS).

    She said the statement summarised the evidence given in court.

    Onuegbu contended that an accused’s confessional statement “plays an important role in the guilt of an accused person.”

    She urged the court to discountenance the argument by the accused lawyer and resolve all issues canvassed in favour of the prosecution.

    On his part, defence lawyer, Sheriff Okoh, argued that the charges against the accused are not based on evidence and such should be discountenanced.

    He stated that the accused was standing trial on allegation that he had the knowledge of the Madalla bombing, an allegation the (accused) had denied.

    Okoh contended that before a person could be declared guilty under Section 7 (1) of Terrorism Prevention Act, his actual knowledge of the crime must be proved.

    Okoh argued that Boko Haram was not an illegal body until around April this year when the Federal Government proscribed and labelled it so.

    He argued that until his client’s arrest, Boko Haram was not an illegal association.

     

  • Christmas Day bombing: Kabiru Sokoto has case to answer –Supreme Court

    Christmas Day bombing: Kabiru Sokoto has case to answer –Supreme Court

    The Federal High Court, Abuja yesterday dismissed the no-case submission made by the alleged mastermind of the 2011 Christmas Day bombing of St Theresa Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State, Kabiru Umar a.k.a. Kabiru Sokoto.

    Umar had at the completion of the prosecution’s case on May 16 argued that no prima facie case was made against him and asked the court to quash the charges against him and set him free.

    Justice Adeniyi Ademola held that the prosecution, via the evidence led, sufficiently made a prima facie case against the accused.

    “The court having held that a prima facie case has been made against the accused person, his no-case submission fails.

    “In the circumstance, the accused person has a case to answer. He is hereby called upon to open his defence,” the judge declared.

    The defence plans to call seven witnesses while the court adjourned to July 5 for Umar to commence his defence.

    Defence lawyer, Mr.Ibrahim Umar, in his submission on June 14, argued that the prosecution had failed to produce sufficient evidence to link him with the charges of terrorism levelled against him. He urged the court to discharge and acquit him.

    He further argued that the proof of evidence before the court did not link Umar to the crimes alleged against him.

    The defence lawyer contended that the evidence so far led by the prosecution failed to establish any offence against him.

    Counsel argued that the evidence by all the six prosecution witnesses amounted to hearsay and urged the court to disregard them.

    He contended that while the state accused Umar of “facilitating the commission of terrorist act by planting and encouraging some boys (now at large) at Mabira Sokoto, in Sokoto State, with the intention to bomb the police headquarters and some other government agencies in the state”, the government failed to bring any of the boys he allegedly planted and encouraged to testify against him.

    He said rather than bring the boys whom the operatives of the State Security Service claimed gave them information about how he encouraged them to bomb the police headquarters and other government agencies in Sokoto, the Federal Government brought operatives of the SSS to give hear-say evidence which has no probative value

    Counsel argued that the prosecution failed to lead evidence to establish how he facilitated the commission of terrorist offence.

    He also argued that although he was accused of withholding information about the plan to bomb the church from law enforcement officers, the prosecution failed to establish at what point he got hold of such information and at what point it became an offence for him not to have disclosed it.

    He contended that all the witnesses that testified in the case wasted the time of the court as the evidence led were not credible to sustain the charge preferred against him.

    He prayed the court to dismiss the two count charge preferred against Umar.

    Prosecution lawyer, Mrs Chioma Onuegbu, in her counter submission, argued that the state had sufficiently established a prima facie against Umar.

    Onuegbu asked the court to discountenance the defence counsel’s submissions.

    “At this stage, the credibility of the witnesses does not arise, the weight to be attached to the witnesses does not arise also,” Mrs Onuegbu argued.

  • Suspected Boko Haram kingpin Kabiru Sokoto knows fate next Friday

    Suspected Boko Haram kingpin Kabiru Sokoto knows fate next Friday

    The Federal High Court in Abuja will next Friday determine the fate of the alleged mastermind of the 2011 Christmas Day bombing at the St Theresa Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State, Kabiru Umar (aka Kabiru Sokoto).

    The court will on June 21 rule on the no-case-submission made by Umar at the completion of the prosecution’s case.

    Justice Adeniyi Ademola chose the day yesterday after parties adopted their written submissions.

    Defence lawyer, Ibrahim Umar, in his submission, argued that the prosecution had failed to produce insufficient evidence to link him with the charges of terrorism levelled against him. He urged the court to discharge and acquit him.

    He further argued that the proof of evidence before the court did not link him to the crimes alleged against him.

    He contended that the evidence so far led by the prosecution failed to establish any offence against him.

    Umar argued that the evidence by all the six prosecution witnesses amounted to hearsay and urged the court to disregard them.

    He contended that while the state accused him of “facilitating the commission of terrorist act by planting and encouraging some boys (now at large) at Mabira Sokoto, in Sokoto State with the intention to bomb the police headquarters and some other government agencies in the state,” the government failed to bring any of the boys he allegely planted and encouraged to testify against him.

    He said rather than bringing the boys whom the operatives of the State Security Service claimed gave them information about how he encouraged them to bomb police headquarters and other government agencies in Sokoto, he said the Federal Government brought operatives of the SSS who came to the court to give hearsay evidence which has no probative value.

    Umar argued that the prosecution failed to lead evidence to establish how he facilitated the commission of terrorist offence.

    Umar also argued that although he was accused of withholding information about the plan to bomb the church from law enforcement officer, the prosecution failed to establish at what point he got hold of such information and at what point it became an offence for him not to have disclosed it.

    Umar contended that all the witnesses that testified in the case wasted the time of the court as the evidence led were not credible to sustain the charge preferred against him.

    He prayed the court to dismiss the two-count charge preferred against him.

    In her counter-submission, prosecution lawyer, Mrs Chioma Onuegbu, stated that the state had sufficiently made out a prima facie against Umar.

    Onuegbu asked the court to discountenance the defence lawyer’s submissions.

    “It is my humble submission that, based on the testimonies of PW1 and PW2 and the exhibits before this honourable court, there is a prima facie case against the accused person that calls on him to give an explanation.

    “At this stage, the credibility of the witnesses does not arise, the weight to be attached to the witnesses does not arise also,”Mrs Onuegbu argued.

  • Christmas Day bombing: Sokoto faults trial

    Christmas Day bombing: Sokoto faults trial

    The alleged mastermind of the 2011 Christmas Day bombing of the St Theresa Catholic Church, Madalla, Niger State, Kabiru Umar aka Kabiru Sokoto has faulted his trial and asked the court to set him free.

    In his no-case submission, Umar argued that the prosecution has failed to produce sufficient evidence to link him with the charges of terrorism leveled against him.

    He urged the court to discharge and acquit him.

    The suspect argued that the proof of evidence before the court did not link him to the alleged crimes.

    He contended that the evidence so far led by the prosecution failed to establish any offence against him

    Umar’s position is contained in a written brief he filed in court, a copy of which The Nation sighted on Friday.

    He contended that while the state accused him of “facilitating the commission of terrorist act by planting and encouraging some boys (now at large) at Mabira Sokoto, in Sokoto State with the intention of bombing the police headquarters and some other government agencies in the state” the government failed to bring any of the boys he allegedly planted and encouraged to testify against him.

    He said rather than bringing the boys whom the operatives of the State Security Service claimed gave them information about how he encouraged them to bomb police headquarters and other government agencies in Sokoto, he said the Federal Government brought operatives of the SSS who came to court to give hear-say evidence which has no “probative value. “

    Umar argued that the prosecution failed to lead evidence to establish how he facilitated the commission of terrorist acts.