Tag: Kemi Badenoch

  • Bomb for Badenoch

    Bomb for Badenoch

    Leader of United Kingdom’s opposition with Nigerian roots, Kemi Badenoch, got a taste of the inherent limitation of nativity transplant last week. She was mocked by Prime Minister Keir Starmer as having appointed herself saviour of Western civilisation in desperate search for relevance. It was an underhand. And the message: no mater how hard you fight to belong in an adopted society, you can’t belong more – nor even as well – as the natives as to obliterate your own true origin.

    Badenoch is the leader of UK’s Conservative Party, which makes her effectively the shadow premier and locates her only an election away from the possibility of taking the reins. But she is controversial for her hardline stance in defence of British and, by extension, Western interests. She is notorious for talking down on Nigeria and repudiating her ancestral roots. She’s against payment of reparations to African nations by Britain and other colonial powers. She defends the British society against charges of racism and is seen by those who daily experience the ill as a  tool in the hands of racist Britain to gaslight their concerns by conveying racism without having to deal with the baggage of being labelled racist, since the rhetoric has been outsourced to a Black person. Recently, she proposed prolonging years of residency required before anyone seeking British citizenship could qualify. In short, she’s been more conservatively British than ancestral Britons.

    Read Also: Nigeria can earn $2.5billion annually from trades with Morocco – Abbas

    At the Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQ) time in the Commons, she sparred with Starmer on proposed increase in Britain’s defence budget. Speaking ahead of his visit to Washington to parley with US President Donald Trump, who has been pressing European leaders to increase their defence spending, Starmer announced that the UK will reallocate aid funds to boost military spending to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2027, amounting to £13.4billion. Badenoch questioned him on the exact amount that Defence Secretary John Healey said could be calculated as £6billion when inflation is factored in, to which the prime minister responded with a retort.

    Upon Starmer’s pitch, Badenoch suggested he took her advice on using international aid money for defence. “Over the weekend, I suggested to the prime minister that he cut the aid budget, and I am pleased that he accepted my advice. It’s the fastest response I’ve ever had from (him),” she said. In reply, the prime minister was subtly but brutally dismissive: “I’m going to have to let the leader of the opposition down gently… She didn’t feature in my thinking at all. I was so busy over the weekend I didn’t even see her proposal,” he said, adding: “She’s appointed herself saviour of the western civilisation in a desperate search for relevance.”

    Starmer has held British knighthood since 2014, even before he entered parliament. You could guess where he’s coming from with Badenoch’s alleged self-appointment as saviour of western civilisation. Cheeky nationalism!

  • Dear The Right Honourable Kemi Badenoch

    Dear The Right Honourable Kemi Badenoch

    I hope this letter meets you in the same unwavering confidence with which you deliver your party’s latest grand vision for immigration reforms. Your recent video was nothing short of a cinematic masterpiece. If Michael Bay ever decides to direct a political thriller on border control, I believe you’ve just auditioned for the lead role, and your chances of getting the role are high given your outstanding performance.

    Your eloquent insistence that your party will “take back control” of immigration was particularly moving. You deserve a special place in heaven for the plan to make it take a whopping fifteen years for an immigrant to become a Briton.

    I also admire your sheer creativity to keep finding new ways to “fix” a system your own party was in charge of for years. It’s almost as if you’re trying to save us from a problem that, mysteriously, seems to have worsened under your watch. How thrilling!

    I must also commend your bold use of the phrase ‘cracking down on abuse’—a term so elastic it can cover everything from stopping human traffickers (fair enough) to making it harder for doctors, carers, and engineers to come here and contribute to an economy already gasping for breath. Genius, really. It takes true vision to frame economic self-sabotage as patriotic duty.

    Your recent video was a tour de force of conviction, selective memory, and good old-fashioned fear-mongering. It’s truly inspiring to see a government so passionately devoted to solving problems of its own creation—like a firefighter who spends years setting blazes and then proudly announces a new initiative to put them out.

    You deserve seven gbosas for your promise to “take back control” of immigration; it was particularly stirring and if I had your forwarding address, I would have delivered bouquet of flowers to your doorstep. It almost felt like I had traveled back in time to 2016, when similar slogans were being thrown around with the same level of enthusiasm and the same lack of tangible results. But no matter! I admire your party’s dedication to keeping the illusion alive. In many ways, this new plan is like a reboot of an old franchise—slightly different special effects, but the same tired plot.

    Read Also: EFCC arraigns 20 Filipinos, Chinese, Indonesian over cybercrime, plot to destabilise Nigeria

    I was also struck by your impassioned pledge to “crack down on abuse.” A noble aim, of course. But forgive my curiosity: what kind of “abuse” are we talking about here? The kind where asylum seekers, fleeing war and persecution, dare to ask for refuge in a country that signed international agreements to protect them? Or perhaps the “abuse” of students who come here to study, pay extortionate fees, and contribute billions to the economy only to be told they’re no longer welcome once they’ve served their financial purpose?

    And then, of course, there’s the ever-popular crackdown on low-skilled migrants—a phrase so wonderfully vague that it can be stretched to fit whatever target your party chooses next. It’s always fascinating to see how “low-skilled” suddenly seems to mean anyone who does an essential job. NHS nurses? Care workers? Hospitality staff? Lorry drivers? Builders? All apparently too unskilled to warrant a place in Britain, despite the country grinding to a halt without them. I can only assume that if we apply this logic consistently, MPs with no real-world experience beyond political internships might also be classified as “low-skilled” and asked to leave?

    Naturally, though, I’m sure these new restrictions won’t apply to all migrants. Those with offshore bank accounts, inherited wealth, or a penchant for making generous donations to certain political parties will, of course, remain free to come and go as they please. After all, we wouldn’t want to discourage all immigration—just the kind that involves people actually working for a living.

    What I find particularly masterful about your messaging is the way it seamlessly blends crisis and control. On one hand, we are told that immigration is out of control, a dire emergency requiring immediate, drastic action. On the other, your government insists that it is in command, making bold and effective decisions. Which is it, I wonder? Either you are in control, and this crisis is manufactured for political gain, or you are not in control, in which case—after 14 years in power—whose fault is that, exactly?

    I hope you will take a moment to reflect on your contributions. Perhaps you will smile as you recall the day you boldly declared that institutional racism is a fantasy concocted by malcontents. Maybe you will chuckle at the time you heroically defended the right of Britain to never, ever apologise.

    But should a flicker of doubt creep in on whether or not your legacy will be remembered with admiration or incredulity, fear not. History, after all, is just a matter of perspective. And thanks to you, we now know which perspective truly matters.

    Finally, I would like to extend my deepest admiration for your party’s ability to turn a crisis of your own making into a never-ending campaign slogan. The sheer resilience!

    Looking forward to the next episode of ‘Tough on Immigration, Soft on Solutions’, which you are professionally producing, directing and presenting.

  • Conservative voters doubt Kemi Badenoch’s suitability as UK PM – Poll

    Conservative voters doubt Kemi Badenoch’s suitability as UK PM – Poll

    A YouGov poll has revealed that a majority of Conservative voters are uncertain about Kemi Badenoch’s suitability as prime minister, casting doubt on her leadership prospects as she approaches 100 days as party leader.

    According to the survey, while 48 percent of 2024 Conservative voters view Badenoch as a potential prime minister, only 26 percent believe she would perform well in the role. Among the general electorate, just 14 percent think she has what it takes to lead the country.

    Badenoch, known for her tough stance on immigration, faces scepticism from opposition voters. 

    The poll found that 39 percent of respondents from Labour, Liberal Democrat, and Reform UK supporters view her as untrustworthy while only 19 percent consider her trustworthy. 

    Additionally, 39 percent described her as unlikeable, compared to 24 percent who view her favourably.

    Despite these mixed perceptions, she retains some support among Conservative voters. 

    The poll indicated that 56 percent of the party’s base approve of her leadership, while 17 percent rate her performance negatively.

    The survey results come amid growing challenges for the Conservative Party, with another poll placing it third behind Labour and Reform UK in voter preference.

    Read Also: What you need to know about Kemi Badenoch’s 15-year wait proposal for British citizenship

    Born in the UK to Nigerian parents, Badenoch has championed stricter immigration measures, recently proposing that immigrants must reside in the UK for at least 15 years before becoming eligible for a British passport.

    “Britain is our home, it’s not a hotel,” Badenoch asserted. “It’s time to tell the truth on immigration and propose real plans. I want to reduce immigration and make living here actually mean something. I’m announcing that the Conservative Party is going to do things differently,” she stated. 

  • Kemi Badenoch’s UK citizenship proposal sparks outrage

    Kemi Badenoch’s UK citizenship proposal sparks outrage

    A proposal by UK Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch to extend the waiting period for British citizenship to 15 years has sparked widespread criticism, particularly from the Nigerian community. 

    The plan seeks to tighten immigration rules by increasing the minimum period before migrants can apply for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) from five to ten years.

    It also introduces stricter conditions for permanent residency, barring individuals who claim benefits, seek social housing, or have criminal records. 

    Read Also; Immigrants should wait 15 years for British citizenship – Kemi Badenoch

    Critics argue that the proposed changes unfairly penalize hardworking immigrants striving for stability. The Nigerian community, which constitutes a significant portion of the UK’s migrant population, has strongly opposed the move.

    Some people have voiced their frustration on social media, accusing Badenoch of hypocrisy, given that she benefited from the UK’s immigration system.

    @Ynw_szn wrote, “Ahh ahh, this law don too much oo. Stay for 15 years before u can apply for citizenship, oga oo.”

    @MESIGO422 noted: “They ask her how she got her own citizenship and why she has decided to make it harder for the people in the UK. Tomorrow if people decide to leave the UK the country will be in a deep economic depression. Join us? Let’s make it clear people will start seeing her as a wicked Nigerian woman.”

    @abbello110 wrote: “Immigrants that benefited from the system kicking against the system now. Kemi kemi se jeje.”

    @ayodejiawonowo said: “I actually don’t blame her…. She has to pander to the people of Britain and the fastest way to do that is taking a hard stance on immigration.”

    @Deprincefrk001 mentioned, “She ain’t done yet! A woman who doesn’t want anybody to have the privileges she once had, that woman is Kemi Badenoch.”

  • What you need to know about Kemi Badenoch’s 15-year wait proposal for British citizenship

    What you need to know about Kemi Badenoch’s 15-year wait proposal for British citizenship

    British Conservative Party leader, Kemi Badenoch, has introduced a significant policy change, proposing that immigrants must wait at least 15 years before becoming eligible for British citizenship.

    Badenoch, born to Nigerian parents in the UK, became the leader of the UK’s opposition party in November 2024.

    Her popularity is hinged on her hardline views on immigration.

    Under current rules, workers and refugees who have been in the UK for five years can apply for indefinite leave to remain, which allows them to stay in the country but does not grant full citizenship.

    This indefinite leave to remain allows people to claim benefits for the first time, though they must wait a further year before applying for citizenship.

    In her first major announcement as Conservative leader, Badenoch outlined plans to tighten the immigration system, including extending the waiting period for migrants to apply for indefinite leave to remain (ILR) from five to ten years.

    Before applying for ILR, a person only needs to have worked in the UK for five years. The duration can be lower for different types of visas.

    Read Also; Immigrants should wait 15 years for British citizenship – Kemi Badenoch

    The individual can then apply for British citizenship one year after getting ILR.

    She also revealed that individuals who claim benefits, rely on social housing, or have criminal records would be permanently barred from settling in the UK.

    She said in part, “I want to reduce immigration and make living here actually mean something. We need to change the way our immigration system works.

    “So I am announcing that the conservative party is going to do the following things differently:

    “1. If you want to stay in our country permanently and apply for indefinite leave to remain, the time you have to live here before you apply would increase from 5 years to 10 years.

    “2. You will have to be a net contributor with a high enough salary, especially if you want to bring family members with you. And if you have a criminal record, you are banned.”

    “We would increase the time you can apply for a British passport from 12 months to 5 years, meaning it will take a minimum of 15 years to start an application.

    “If you enter this country illegally or overstay your visa, you will be banned from ever getting leave to remain or a passport,” she said in a video shared on her X, formerly known as Twitter, on Thursday.”

    The Conservative Party is pushing to apply these changes retroactively to 2021 through amendments to the upcoming Border Security, Asylum, and Immigration Bill, which will be debated in Parliament next week.

    While many immigrants on work visas, asylum seekers, and those in the UK illegally are already restricted from claiming state benefits under the “no recourse to public funds” rule, Badenoch’s proposal aims to tighten access further.

    She believed the system must ensure that only those who have a genuine connection to the UK and contribute to the economy can settle permanently.

    “We need to make sure that people coming here have a real, meaningful connection to the UK ,no criminal records, they should be net contributors to the economy, not relying on benefits but people who care about our country and our communities,” Badenoch told the BBC.

    People entering illegally – which includes those seeking asylum from almost everywhere in the world – would be barred from ever claiming settled status.

    Dame Angela Eagle, the minister for border security, said the Conservatives had “lost control of our borders” during their 14 years in power.

    She said: “After 14 years of shameful Tory failure no one will take seriously anything they claim or promise now.

  • Immigrants should wait 15 years for British citizenship – Kemi Badenoch

    Immigrants should wait 15 years for British citizenship – Kemi Badenoch

    Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has unveiled a significant immigration reform proposal, increasing the wait time for migrants to become eligible for British citizenship to 15 years.

    As part of the new measures, Badenoch announced that the period before migrants can apply for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) would extend from five to ten years. Furthermore, those seeking citizenship must wait an additional five years after securing ILR.

    “I want to reduce immigration and make living here actually mean something,” Badenoch stated in a video shared on her X account.

    “If you want to stay in our country permanently, the time you have to live here before applying for ILR would increase from five to ten years.”

    Some of her other proposals include:

    Ineligibility for Benefits or Social Housing: Migrants who access welfare support or social housing will be barred from permanent settlement.

    Criminal Record Ban: Individuals with a criminal record will be permanently ineligible for citizenship.

    Entry Conditions: Those who enter the UK illegally or overstay their visa will be banned from ever obtaining leave to remain or a passport.

    Read Also: Kemi Badenoch and the elevation of hypocrisy

    Under the current system, migrants can apply for ILR after five years, with citizenship eligibility following 12 months later. Badenoch’s proposal would triple the minimum timeframe from six to 15 years.

    The Conservative Party plans to backdate the changes to 2021 by amending the upcoming Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill.

    Badenoch emphasized the need for tighter immigration rules, arguing that the current system has become a “conveyor belt” to citizenship, placing strain on public services. “We need to ensure that people coming here have a meaningful connection to the UK, are net contributors to the economy, and genuinely care about our communities,” she said.

  • Kemi Badenoch and the elevation of hypocrisy

    Kemi Badenoch and the elevation of hypocrisy

    • By Jude Ndukwe

    Sir: Leader of British Conservative Party and Opposition in the United Kingdom Parliament, Kemi Badenoch, has continued to stir the hornet’s nest with her controversial statements about Nigeria since assuming office . She has made what many consider denigrating statements against Nigeria, her country of origin, while exalting the UK, her adopted country.

    While her remarks about the country cannot entirely be dismissed,  her flawed and effusive glorification of the United Kingdom, prove that she is either grossly ignorant of Nigeria’s foundational deficiencies or she deliberately chooses to ignore the facts and spew heavily skewed narratives against Nigeria to the advantage of the UK mainly to feather her own political nest.

    Everything Nigeria suffers today is arguably a direct result of the brutish legacies of the British in colonial Africa. From Nembe Kingdom to the Oyo Empire; from the Owa Kingdom to the Benin Kingdom; from today’s Chibok to Calabar; from Zaria to Opobo; from Onitsha to Ife; the nation reeks of British infamous heritage of blood, sorrow, fraud, corruption, outright stealing among other unspeakable vices.

    While we agree that our police, and by extension, our political leaders, need to do far better, Badenoch should have focused on her new role as leader of the opposition in the UK to help clean up the heinous history of that country. History shows that our police and political leaders inherited several vices from the British. Such vices include but not limited to Kemi Badenoch’s Britain holding tightly on to their monumental loot from Africa.

    In 1897, the British forcefully seized 500 ivory tusks worth over two million British pounds from the Benin Empire after the forced ousting of the then Oba, Ovonramwen Nogbaisi. As of today, the British Museum alone holds around 73,0000 valuable cultural objects looted from Africa by the British colonial usurpers. And all efforts to get them to return these looted artefacts back to their original owners in Africa have met with a brick wall.

    Read Also: NELFUND’s loans hit N116.184bn

    Does she not feel embarrassed that the world’s largest diamond known as the Star of Africa which weighs a whopping 530 carats and set in the British royal scepter with which King Charles III was coronated in May 2023, and still holds to date, was stolen from Africa in 1905 by the colonial British usurpers?

    Does she not cringe or get flummoxed knowing full well that a similar piece of diamond also stolen from Africa by British colonial masters, even though smaller, is also set in the Imperial State Crown worn by British monarchs on ceremonial occasions?

    How does she feel knowing that the highly revered British monarchs are coronated with a sceptre and a crown emblazoned with stolen jewels from Africa? How does she feel seeing her monarch flaunting stolen pieces of diamond with relish before the entire world in the name of royalty?

    It was the same crown and sceptre emblazoned with looted diamonds from Africa that the British crowned the late Queen Elizabeth with 70 years ago. How come Britain still hold on to stolen property from Africa for so long with such impunity and still crown their monarchs with the items right in the full glare of the whole world while Kemi Badenoch continues to play the ostrich?

    One can only imagine what would have happened if the tables turned and an African Head of State is crowned with jewels stolen from the West!

    Rather than hypocritically pontificate about Nigeria and the UK, Kemi should use her privileged position as leader of the country’s Conservative Party to clean up Britain’s criminal record of mindless looting of our artefacts and precious jewels and ensure their return to their original owners in Africa. She can go beyond mere rhetoric by following in the footsteps of a former Foreign Secretary, Charles James Fox who initiated the anti-slavery Bill that eventually saw to the abolition of slavery in Britain.

    They steal our resources through subterfuge; they become so rich and powerful through them, and then turn around to lecture us on morality.

    That nonsense must stop forthwith!

    •Jude Ndukwe,

      Abuja.

  • Badenoch and the diaspora mind-set

    Badenoch and the diaspora mind-set

    By Chike Okolocha

    Kemi Badenoch, nee Adegoke, Leader of the British Conservative (Tory) Party who represents North West Essex in the House of Commons, is a right-wing, combative and fearless politician who revels in controversy. Recently, she publicly disavowed her Nigerian heritage with a spectacular reference to police corruption. Maybe she should have chosen another example as police corruption, though rampant, is not unique to Nigeria. In 2023 alone, 85% of police officers in England and Wales charged for misconduct were found liable. And, according to a recent report by Andy Cooke, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of the Constabulary titled “Beyond the Badge: Deep-rooted Problems in Policing,” many British police officers routinely engage in unethical and illegal activity. Indeed police misdemeanour is universal as there is hardly any country in the world with a wholly popular police.

    She further indicated that she would rather restrict her Nigerianess to being Yoruba because of wanton terrorism in the northern part of the country. What about terrorism in southern Nigeria?

    Indeed, Badenoch’s problem with Nigeria cannot be attributed to her negative encounter with the police or terrorism in northern Nigeria. A recent podcast actually attributed her attitude to a more deep-seated alienation which afflicts many Nigerians in the UK and elsewhere. Nigerians in the UK have an astounding negativity about Nigeria. Any visiting Nigerian is immediately accosted as an accomplice in the chicanery at home. Woe betide the visitor if (s)he is a government official! Perhaps such officials deserve the blame.

    Diaspora Nigerians disclaim any liability whatsoever in the mess at home, and they give the impression that their departure should energise those left behind to recreate the country. They also tend to premise their probable return on the how quickly Nigerians at home are able to fix the country. Yes: they will return only when there is constant electricity, good roads and sundry infrastructure and whenever bribery, corruption and tribalism have been wiped out and employment is guaranteed. It does not occur to diaspora Nigerians that these ambitions on good life are shared by Nigerians at home too. The vast majority of Nigerians in Nigeria are not complicit in bad governance and corruption among officials.

    Read Also: Saudi Arabia sponsors 20 Nigerian on pilgrimage

    As the first black woman to lead a major political party in the United Kingdom, you are wont to expect some empathy from Kemi Badenoch for longsuffering Nigerians, but she cares very little about her identity. This attitude which she cultivated from her youth has worked for her. She relocated from Nigeria to the UK in 1996 at a tender age of 16 years (ostensibly to avoid the backlash of the Sani Abacha regime), enrolled for A-levels, studied in Sussex University, converted into old-school politics and gained degrees in engineering and law. She formally joined the Conservative Party in 2005, lost several elections and voted for Brexit in 2016, the success of which was her springboard into parliament in 2017.

    In the tumult of Conservative Party government, Badenoch fortuitously became the Secretary of International Trade in the short-lived government of Prime Minister Liz Truss, having joined in the revolt against Boris Johnson under whom she was a junior minister. She retained her position as Secretary of International Trade under Prime Minister Rishi Sunak who gave her several other positions until the 2024 political tsunami that swept the Labour Party into power.

    Though Kemi Badenoch has a wealthy parentage, she arrived in England a lonely teenager without money. She had to work to support herself but apparently never suffered any deprivation in her life. Her identification with the rich is thus a function of her heritage and genial life experiences. She associated with the well-to-do and was in confrontation with the left-wing even in the university. Contrary to evidence, she criticised the notion of widespread institutional racism against the hoi polloi of minorities in the UK, citing her rise to the leadership of the Conservative Party as enough evidence. And, in defiance of her immigrant background, she is perhaps the fiercest anti-immigration politician in the UK, comparable only to Donald Trump in America.

    Also very interesting is that unlike Rishi Sunak who cherishes his Asian roots, Badenoch abhors multiculturalism and believes all immigrants must integrate and adopt British values. She has done that.

    It is not surprising that she is provocatively anti-feminist, declaring maternity pay as excessive and helping to vote down the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill. As an apostle of the status quo from which she has benefitted, Badenoch does not shy away from airing her anti-modernist views, claiming that not all cultures are valid; but she apologised for hacking into the website of Labour Party leaders, an offense she dismissed as a joke. Strangely, she claimed that left-wing politics destroyed Nigeria. One is at a complete loss on how to justify this bold assertion as Nigerian politics is bereft of a left wing unless we accept the posturing of the late Aminu Kano and those who call themselves “progressives”.

    Even more disconcerting is her claim that the Glorious Revolution of 1688 paved the way for political stability in the UK and this led to the Industrial Revolution, not white privilege, slavery, colonialism and imperialism. Her sentiments are identical with those expressed in the “Imperial Measurement”, a report by the conservative Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) which proclaims that the net economic impact of trans-Atlantic slave trade and British occupation of a quarter of the world’s land area during colonialism was negative. Rather, IEA gives credit to free market economics and liberal institutions for the rise and dominance of Britain and the resilience of its economy to date.

    Nothing can be farther from the truth as evidenced by the advocacy of the Heirs of Slavery campaign group in the UK which credits slavery with the economic ascendancy of the country. Through detailed historical and deductive economic research, the University of West Indies has concluded that the UK owed US$24 trillion in reparations for transatlantic slavery to 14 countries.

    Similarly, in a book titled “Slavery, Capitalism and the Industrial Revolution”, Maxine Berg and Pat Hudson placed slavery at the heart of early industrialisation as well as the growth of banking and insurance services in England. Without slave-grown sugar and cotton as well as slave cargoes, there would have been nothing like British shipping or marine insurance. They pointed out that the frequent burning down of slave-grown sugar refineries in the UK also accounted for the growth of insurance. And, would there have been a boom in the textile industry in the UK without slave-grown cotton? Note also that the emergence of a strong Royal Navy was a function of the protection and policing of the slave trade. The British Empire was a veritable source of easy profits and rents.

    Kemi Badeoch is obviously alarmed by the increasing validation of this view which she stoutly disavows. She knows that the growing popularity of debt to slavery will ultimately bring the UK under increasing pressures for justice. Rishi Sunak refused to apologise for the Slave Trade because of this fear. But time will tell if Britain can ultimately escape the imperative of paying reparations.

    Some have attributed the ultra-conservatism of Badenoch to her background in science and banking. This may be so but she has already garnered ample political experience which cannot be constricted by science and banking. She knows what she is doing. Badenoch is a consummate politician who understands the conservative mind-set which she has fully exploited to great success. We should expect her to do more of what she is doing. It remains to be seen if her pragmatism will catapult her to the office of Prime Minister and keep her there for a long time.

    •Prof Okolocha is of Social Science Academy of Nigeria, Abuja.

  • Lawyer to Kemi Badenoch: you are a mere tenant in Britain

    Lawyer to Kemi Badenoch: you are a mere tenant in Britain

    …warns against constant denigration of Nigeria

    A constitutional lawyer and international law expert, Prince Uche Darlington Okeke, has urged Ms. Kemi Badenoch to refrain from making disparaging remarks about Nigeria, describing her as merely “a tenant in Britain.”

    Okeke advised the leader of the United Kingdom’s Conservative Party to be mindful of her statements and avoid uncomplimentary remarks about her country of birth.

    In a statement released on Tuesday in Onitsha, Okeke, a Nigerian-born, British-trained lawyer, expressed his disappointment over Badenoch’s recent comments, emphasizing that such remarks were unexpected from an influential figure of Nigerian descent.

    Badenoch, in her first speech of 2025, criticized Nigeria and its leadership, stating: “I don’t want Britain to be like ‘poor’ Nigeria, where terrible government destroys lives.” 

    She further remarked on her experiences growing up in Nigeria, saying: “I grew up in a poor country and watched my relatively wealthy family become poorer despite working harder, as their money disappeared with inflation.”

    Reacting to these statements, Okeke described them as not only disappointing but also a reminder of the need for public figures to uphold respect for international law and cultural sensitivity.

    “As a leader and the shadow Prime Minister of the UK, it is crucial to recognize the importance of respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of nations, as enshrined in the United Nations Charter,” Okeke stated.

    Read Also: Brain drain: Our hospitals may soon be empty, CMDs cry out

    “Meddling into the internal affairs of another country can have serious consequences, including damaging bilateral relationship and undermining global stability. 

    “The principle of non-interference in international law, as stated in Article 2(7) of the United Nations Charter, prohibits countries and their leaders from interfering in the internal affairs of other nations”, said the constitutional lawyer.

    “Badenoch’s comments also violate the African Union’s Non-Aggression and Common Defence Pact, which emphasizes the importance of non-interference in the internal affairs of member states.

    “Furthermore, cultural sensitivity and understanding are crucial in today’s interconnected world. 

    “Public figures have a responsibility to promote respectful dialogue and avoid perpetuating negative stereotypes or biases. This includes being mindful of the historical and cultural context of the countries they comment on. 

    “In addition, her statements are divisive and inflammatory, and they undermine Nigeria’s global significance and contributions. 

    “As a leader, she should promote unity, understanding, and respect for diversity rather than perpetuating negative stereotypes and fueling discord”.

    “In this case, Badenoch’s comments not only demonstrate a lack of cultural sensitivity but also disregard the progress Nigeria has made in recent years. 

    “As a public figure, she has a responsibility to promote a more nuanced and accurate understanding of other countries and their people” the Constitutional lawyer said

  • Friends of Ripples

    Friends of Ripples

    December 2024 was exciting, very exciting — for both news and column writing.

    Kemi Badenoch, the British Tory Opposition Leader, who Sam Omatseye promptly re-named “Oyinbokemi”, was running her mouth to her heart’s content.

    Her native Nigeria was a dystopia beyond redemption.  Her new-found heaven, Britain, even with clear centuries of empire crimes, was a utopia without reproach. 

    Badenoch!  Ever saw an over-zealous neophyte, with a knocked silly psyche — so mixed-up she pissed on her heritage but felt hip, so long as her beloved, right-wing Brits cheered?  Oyinbokemi indeed!

    Teasy Vice President Kashim Shettima nettled Badnoch to junk her Nigerian — not Yoruba — name, but the hyper-educated Mrs. Badnoch unravelled in full emptiness: she was Yoruba, she wailed; and the Hausa, Fulani, Kanuri, et al, of the “North” (where Shettima belonged) were her ancestral foes! 

    Who told her so?  The Yoruba Omoluabi ethos, of live and let live?  Or parental poison, buried deep in her child’s soul, now nurtured into a cross-racial gargoyle of self-hate?

    Did you ever see a hyper-educated woman manifest the basest of Plato’s allegory of the cave: that pit-black ignorance, before the naked lamp, then electricity, and finally glorious and dizzying sunlight, tore you from sweet dimness?

    Well, nature abhors a vacuum.  As Badenoch was throwing Nigeria under the bus, two other Brits — and both ethnic Yoruba — gave it a prime sheen, which politics could not.

    Ademola Lookman, 2024 African Footballer of the Year, heralded his win, in Morocco, with a greeting in Yoruba, to the distinguished gathering: “E kaale Nigeria, mo nki gbogbo yin, e se, mo dupe …”

    Mola’s accent was rather quaint. But it was quaint Yoruba that hugged all, repulsed none; which global TV beamed: “Good evening, Nigeria.  I greet you all. Thank you …”

    Read Also: FG assures Nigerians of economic recovery, growth

    It was Shettima’s cheeky challenge come again to haunt — and taunt — Kemi. She self-devalued as no more than a garnished Sunday Igboho — who must hate the Fulani to prove his Yoruba love. Lookman is the quintessential opposite: no need to hate to prove love!

    Every patriot latched onto that loving crow for motherland, in that moment of pan-Nigerian glory! 

    And before “Detty December” exited — that growing global tourism foray into Lagos, Nigeria — guess who fervently knocked, with high praise and love? Anthony Joshua!

    Crest or dale in his world heavyweight boxing odyssey, AJ aka “Sagamu boy”, had always identified with his roots, warts and all. 

    So, when he visited Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM) boss, Abike Dabiri-Erewa and hubby, in their Lagos home, it was the Badenoch rebuke, all over again.  The original battle was drawn over Badenoch’s chill towards NIDCOM’s warmth.

    Still, don’t be too hard on Mrs. Badenoch. She has chosen her path — and she’ll float or sink by it. It galls because her cross-racial opportunism courts cheap political gains.

    Yet, Peter Obi manifests no less rank opportunism here — and his own forte is playing (and preying) on faith and ethnic — nay, clannish — divides, as emotive magnet.

    He’s not about to depart that pious cynicism. He knows no other way to sate his zombie Obidient base!

    But that high cynicism, without or within, which Badenoch and Obi epitomize, set the vacationing Ripples thinking of his column friends — across Nigeria’s geo-political zones, tongues and faiths.

    Indeed, all the Badenoch fireworks caught me in the Ilorin home of one of such elderly friends, Uncle Ray Yusuf, a retired NTA broadcaster of the purest crust. 

    But he’s only few of these friends that Ripples ever met — with Uncle Saliu Ojibara, an Ilorin native and chartered accountant of high repute. He is ex-NTA too.

    In his teenage years, he was a celebrated master-dribbler in the Lagos of mid-1960s and mid-1970s.  He was nicknamed “Stanley Matthews”, for his audacious ball skills.

    He rubbed shoulders with the great Haruna Ilerika (of blessed memory), as they set Lagos communal pitches on fire, with exciting  “felele” challenge football!  Uncle Ojii would buy The Nation, every Tuesday, only when Ripples is at work, not when on leave!

    Most other friends, Ripples has not met — and perhaps will never meet.  Yet, no week passes without each getting in touch, to share ideas on how to better Nigeria.

    Madam Pet Mmonu saw the Civil War (1967-1970), in Enugu, as a sub-teenage girl. So, she cringes from the neo-Biafra hot heads that crave blood and gore. Every Tuesday, after reading Republican Ripples, her abiding passion: how do we fix Nigeria?

    Col. Azubike Nass (retd) knows no clannish thinking. He applies his forensic mind to fixing Nigeria.  We met on this page — but have never seen.

    Prof. Ikenna Onyido, quintessential scientist, scholar and former vice-chancellor, calls me son. I call him dad. The one is Igbo. The other is Yoruba.  But that bond is so pure, so strong, it won’t ever end as Okonkwo, in Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, killing Ikemefuna that called him father!  Such trust!  We met here!

    Elder Frank Ede left Delta, for Lagos, to present me three copies of his friend, Engr. Alex Neyin’s autobiography: one for Tatalo Alamu; one for Sam Omatseye; one for Ripples.  The magnet was again this column.

    Years earlier, Igwe Pius Ojonile Omachonu had despatched two of his books, for my reading pleasure; and from time to time, we cut and thrust, on WhatsApp, over the Nigerian question!  We’ve never met!

    Can I ever forget Boluwaji Faseyi, the Akure-based youth who dots upon Ripples’ weekly offerings that he’s more or less virtual family, though we’d never met?  Or Habibu Aminu Lawan, the teacher-broadcaster from Kano, who relates as if he’s kith-and-kin?

    These networks beggar Badenoch’s the-North-is-Yoruba-enemy cave mindset!

    But back to Uncle Ray.  In his Ilorin home, a pan-Nigerian family is solving a pan-Nigerian challenge: playing foster-parents to Henry, a Christian teen from Biridaji village, Kebbi State.

    The Yusufs — the patriarch, a Muslim; the matriarch, a Catholic, living happily ever-after! — are a loving rebuke to those who would war over faith and creed.

    Now, a Catholic network, looking out for vulnerable youth — from faith fundamentalism and sundry violence — plants them in safe Catholic homes, away from harm.  He, to help with house chores.  They, to send him to school; or make him learn a trade.

    That was how Henry — I call him King Henry for his winsome smiles and comely ways — ended up with the Yusufs. 

    Again, a pleasant irony: even if Henry was fleeing from faith tension, he has found peace, joy and comfort, with his future assured, in a faith-tolerant home!

    Here, these folks aren’t pointing fingers.  Or like Badenoch and Obi, scavenging for carcasses to foul the air. 

    They, instead, hanker down to dismantle as many challenges as they can, in their quiet homes — and they don’t even squeak about these breakthroughs.

    Committed Nigerians will solve the problems of Nigeria.  Political charlatans — home and abroad — will get what’s coming their way. 

    So, let Oyinbokemi, leaky mouth, et al, stick with her morbid fixation with Nigeria. Those are ripening seeds of her political self-destruction. But she’s too doomed to know.

    Happy new year!

    All too soon, rest is over and it’s time for work.  Happy new year, folks!