Tag: Lateef Fagbemi

  • Fagbemi, Osigwe ask courts to promote peace, development via judgments

    Fagbemi, Osigwe ask courts to promote peace, development via judgments

    • NICN president pledges enhanced service delivery

    The Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Justice Minister Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) and the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Afam Osigwe (SAN) have asked courts to always dispense justice for the purpose of promoting societal peace and aid economic development.

    Fagbemi and Osigwe spoke during a court session marking the commencement of the 2024/2025 legal year of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) yesterday in Abuja.

    Fagbemi noted that the country has, in recent years, faced significant economic challenges, including high unemployment rates, rising inflation, and declining revenue.

    The AGF advised that in view of the current state of affairs, “it is imperative that our judicial system, including the National Industrial Court, plays a proactive role in addressing these challenges”.

    Read Also; 13 repentant terrorists escape with govt rifles in Borno

    He added: “By ensuring timely and efficient resolution of industrial disputes, the court can help to prevent disruptions to career progression, economic activity and maintain a stable business environment.”

    Praising the NICN for fostering an environment that is conducive for business to thrive, Fagbemi noted that industrial harmony was essential for attracting foreign investment, creating jobs, and promoting sustainable development.

    The AGF urged the court to ensure that its decisions are “grounded on sound legal principles and a deep understanding of the complexities of the labour market” because of the impact its judgments and rulings have on “the stability and efficiency of our industries”.

    He urged the court to “always strive to achieve a sustainable balance between justice for the employer, employee and the public/society”.

    Osigwe, who was represented by NBA’s Second Vice President, Mrs. Bolatumi Animashaun, noted that “public interest is best served when labour justice is administered swiftly, fairly, and impartially”.

    The NBA president noted that due to the sensitive and emotional nature of labour disputes, courts adjudicating such disputes, “must balance the rights of workers to fair treatment with the legitimate interests of employers to remain competitive and sustainable in an increasingly challenging economic environment”.

    He called for reforms in the justice sector, seeking the computerisation of the litigation process, including the full recording of court proceedings in all superior courts of record.

    Osigwe cautioned against open and elaborate celebration of judges’ appointments, saying they unduly exposes judicial officers to desperate politicians and like minds.

    NICN’s President, Justice Benedict Kanyip, expressed optimism that the court would improve on its current performance.

    He said of the 8,608 pending cases inherited in the last legal year, 1,616 were decided, leaving 6,992 still pending.

    Justice Kanyip hailed the Executive and the Legislature for the recent legislative interventions to enhance the welfare of judicial officers.

    The NICN president advised that Section 291 of the 1999 Constitution be further amended to allow for retired judicial officers to take as pension same salary and allowances of their equivalents who are still in service at any time.

    Justice Kanyip added: “We at the NICN, however, urge that provisions relating to the NICN (sections 254F) and other provisions, such as Item 34 of the Exclusive List, be left as they are.

    “Current public review of the NICN has generally been positive and encouraging. As it is often said, it makes little sense changing a winning team or formula.”

    The NICN president expressed misgivings about the requests she received to intervene in labour disputes.

    She said: “I complained in my 2022/2023 legal year speech about receiving letters asking me to intervene in labour disputes that are not before the court. This practice has not stopped.

    “I must, accordingly, reiterate that ours is not an administrative agency as to allow us intervene extra-judicially in disputes that have not been filed before the court. Our primary mandate as a labour court is the dispensation of labour justice.”

  • AGF seeks end to pardon for corruption convicts

    AGF seeks end to pardon for corruption convicts

    • Fagbemi: we need law review to stop Prerogative of Mercy for those jailed for graft

    Should the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) have his way, those found guilty of corruption would not be entitled to state pardon.

    Fagbemi made the recommendation yesterday in Abuja at a roundtable organised by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) for state Attorneys General.

    “I will suggest in our next constitution review that we expunge those found guilty of corruption from benefiting from powers of ‘Prerogative of Mercy’ to serve as a deterrent to others,” the AGF was quoted as saying by his spokesman Kamarudeen Ogundele.

    Fagbemi, who frowned at the inadequate investigation of criminal cases by law enforcement agencies, advised them to always arm themselves with sufficient facts before inviting anyone for questioning.

    A statement by Ogundele reads: “The AGF said the cooperation of all stakeholders, especially the AGs, was crucial in the fight against corruption.

    “Fagbemi advised the AGs to eschew nepotism, political witch-hunting, rivalry, and bigotry in the fight against corruption just because they want to please their governors.

    “He also said there should be no basis for rationalising corruption or crimes.

    “He said their legal opinions on cases must be based on the facts as practised in the advanced countries, adding: ‘We should not give in to public sentiments. In Nigeria, we are polarised along political lines.’

    “The AGF advised participants and anti-graft agencies to conduct thorough investigations of cases before arresting suspects to avoid media trials.

    “’Let us be thorough and take our time before inviting someone for questioning. Don’t do a shoddy job and be quick to say we have caught a big fish…You will catch a big fish. If it is two or three big fish you are able to get in a year and you are thorough, it is alright.’”

    Ogundele said the AGF also counselled against filing bogus counts of charges against defendants just to generate frenzy in the public against the suspect.

    He quotes the AGF as saying: “Nobody wants a 50-count charge…make it five or six and be sure. Make sure you get him (suspect) in.”

    Former Governors Rev Jolly Nyame (Taraba) and Joshua Chibi Dariye (Plateau) are recent examples of those granted a presidential pardon.

    They were forgiven in 2022 after serving some years following corruption convictions.

    Dariye was jailed by a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) for stealing N2 billion of public funds while in office.

    Nyame was serving a 12-year jail term for misappropriation of funds while he was in office. The Supreme Court upheld his conviction in February 2020.

    In a speech read earlier on his behalf by a director in the Federal Ministry of Justice, Mrs. Victoria Ojogbanne, Fagbemi identified corruption as the core hindrance to the nation’s development.

    He argued that despite the country’s immense potential, it has remained prostrate owing to the challenge of corruption.

    Fagbemi added: “Nigeria is a land of immense potential, blessed with vibrant cultures, abundant resources, and a dynamic population brimming with talent and ambition.

    “Yet, despite these advantages, corruption remains a formidable barrier to our progress and prosperity. It undermines our institutions, distorts economic opportunities, and erodes the trust that is vital for a thriving society.

    “Today, we gather not only to acknowledge this impediment to our nation’s development but to chart a course towards a brighter future – a future where integrity, transparency, and accountability would define our path forward.

    “To achieve this vision, it is imperative that we build a unified front against corruption, harnessing the collective strength of every segment of our society.

    “First and foremost, our fight against corruption must begin with a shared commitment to reformation and transparency. It is essential that we strengthen our institutions, fortify our legal frameworks, and ensure that justice is both prompt and impartial.

    “The integrity of our judicial system is paramount, and we must work tirelessly to eliminate any weaknesses that can be exploited by corrupt elements.”

    Fagbemi stressed the need for cooperation.

    He said: “Collaboration is key. No single entity or individual can tackle corruption alone. We must foster a spirit of cooperation between government agencies, the private sector, civil society, and international partners.

    “By sharing information, resources, and best practices, we can create a more robust and effective mechanism for combating corruption.

    “Public and private sector leaders must lead by example, setting standards of ethical behaviour and accountability that others will follow.

    “I must commend the resolve of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for donating property to serve as the Network of Anti-Corruption Institutions in West Africa, the NACIWA permanent headquarters.

    “Mr. President’s resolve underscores the importance of strengthening institutional capacity and enhancing cross-border cooperation in the prevention, detection and investigation of corrupt practice.

    “Thirdly, we must engage and empower our citizens. An informed and active populace is one of the most powerful tools against corruption.

    “Education and awareness campaigns are crucial in equipping Nigerians with the knowledge to recognize and resist corrupt practices.

    “We must encourage whistleblowing and protect those who bravely stand against corruption. The fight against corruption is a shared responsibility, and every citizen has a role to play.

    Read Also: Water transport, viable alternative to high road fare, says LAGFERRY

    “This is why at the African Anti-Corruption Day held on 11 July 2024 we emphasised the urgent need to collaborate with the legislature to pass a robust whistleblower protection law in Nigeria to safeguard whistleblowers’ anonymity, safety, and rights. This would in turn boost the fight against corruption and promote accountability.”

    According to the AGF, addressing corruption “requires vigilance and resilience”.

    “It is essential that we continuously evaluate our strategies, adapt to emerging challenges, and maintain a steadfast resolve in our efforts.

    “Our commitment to fighting corruption must be unwavering, regardless of the obstacles we encounter. Let me reiterate that the fight against corruption is not just a legal battle but a moral and societal one.

    “As the chief legal officers in your respective states, you have a unique role in ensuring that this fight is sustained, strengthened, and ultimately won.

    “I am confident that with your cooperation, commitment, and dedication, we can build a stronger, more independent, and more effective ICPC that will serve as a beacon of hope for our nation,” Fagbemi said.

  • ‘Govt joining forces with foreign nations to recover stolen wealth’

    ‘Govt joining forces with foreign nations to recover stolen wealth’

    • Lawyers seek speeding up of justice system

    Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) yesterday said Nigeria was working with foreign nations to recover more looted funds.

    He said his ministry was rallying anti-corruption agencies to speed up the prosecution of corrupt persons.

    It is also engaging with the police and other agencies on issues bordering on the rules of law, administration of criminal justice and Correctional Centres reforms.

    Also yesterday, Lagos Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Lawal Pedro (SAN), stressed the need for speed and efficiency in the justice delivery.

    He said an efficient system will attract more investments to drive development.

    Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Chairman Olanipekun Olukoyede urged the National Assembly to enact a law to strengthen the whistleblower policy.

    Fagbemi, Pedro and Olukoyede spoke during breakout sessions at the ongoing Annual General Conference (AGC) of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Lagos.

    The AGF said the National Justice Summit organised by his ministry produced the National Justice Roadmap that guides its work.

    He called for the support of Nigerians in the anti-graft war and in justice sector reforms.

    Pedro, speaking during a Lagos exhibition at the NBA conference, said the current pace of justice is insufficient.

    He believes significant changes were necessary to support economic growth and investment.

    “The way we administer justice must change. It’s no longer enough to provide access to justice.

    “We must ensure that cases are resolved promptly, as justice delayed is justice denied,” Pedro said.

    He said the state was committed to reducing the time it takes to resolve cases in court.

    The goal, he said, is to set a new benchmark for civil cases to be completed within two years.

    Pedro believes landlord-tenant disputes should be resolved in no more than six months.

    This, he said, will encourage investment and economic activity.

    On the review of judicial officers’ salaries, Pedro said Lagos would continue to take the lead in caring for members of the Bench.

    “Lagos has always been different. Even before the federal review, our compensation structure for judicial officers was already above par compared to most other states,” he said.

    Read Also: Foreign firms’ exit: FBS Re to boost Africa’s reinsurance capacity

    He promised that the state government would soon unveil new initiatives to enhance magistrates’ working conditions.

    “There’s something significant coming for our magistrates, and Mr. Governor will announce it in due time—likely within the next two to three months,” Pedro revealed.

    EFCC boss seeks law strengthening whistle-blower policy

    Speaking on the theme: “Lawyers in the spotlight: essential anti-money laundering considerations for the legal profession,” Olukoyede said a law is needed to make it mandatory for law enforcement agencies to protect whistleblowers.

    The EFCC boss urged lawyers not to indulge in activities that will encourage crimes.

    He asked them not to protect suspected criminals as they must bring any person who has committed financial crimes to court.

    “Don’t try to protect suspected criminals and people who must have committed financial crimes.

    “If you know where, who, or whatever we are looking for, you must bring that person to the open and we will do our own part,” he said.

    On the challenges of delayed trials, Olukoyede stressed that the EFCC will ensure that cases are prosecuted no matter how long it takes, with strict adherence to the law.

    EFCC chairman charged lawyers to perform their civic responsibilities as Nigerians and highlighted the importance of mutual respect between them and the EFCC.

    He called for dignity in the way legal professionals and law enforcement agents handle their roles.

     “We are all Nigerians before becoming lawyers, you have a duty to perform.

    “Being a lawyer does not exempt you from your civic responsibilities. Comply and do the right thing.

    “Under my watch, everyone that comes to the EFCC will be treated with dignity, regardless of the circumstances,” he said.

    ‘Police efficient with ACJA’

    Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) in charge of Intelligence, Dasuki Galadanci, said the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) is helping the Police to be efficient and effective.

    “ACJA helps the police in case file management. It ensures that the police are open, sincere and transparent in carrying out their job.

    “It also helps the police in making sure that we work as a team with Judges, Magistrates and the Correctional Services to look at issues objectively to help one another,” he said.

  • ‘Why Nigeria should embrace restorative justice,’ by AGF, IG, senior jurists

    ‘Why Nigeria should embrace restorative justice,’ by AGF, IG, senior jurists

    Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), Inspector General of Police (IG) Kayode Egbetokun, Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho, and his counterpart in the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Justice Hussein Baba Yusuf, have urged support for restorative justice principles in the country.

    According to them, the effective integration of the principles of restorative justice into the existing justice administration system will effectively eliminate the inherent challenges in the county’s criminal justice system.

    Fagbemi, Egbetokun, Tsoho and Yusuf spoke in Abuja yesterday during a ‘wider stakeholders’ review and validation session of the restorative justice documents – The Bill, The Policy, The Practice Direction and Training Manual’, organised by the Federal Ministry of Justice, with support from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

    Fagbemi, represented by the Solicitor-General of the Federation (SGF) and Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Justice, Mrs. Beatrice Jedy-Agba, stressed the need for relevant stakeholders within the country’s justice administration sector to suppress efforts to promote restorative justice in the country.

    Read Also: Nigeria enters export agreement with Saudi Arabia for red beef, soya beans

    He said: “The need to support government policies towards reforming the criminal justice system, particularly through developing restorative justice mechanisms, cannot be overemphasised. The criminal justice system faces tremendous challenges, ranging from recidivism, prolonged duration for trials,  overcrowded custodial centres, and the failure of punishment for offences to meet with standards of justice for the victims and survivors of crime.

    “These challenges are addressed through restorative justice mechanisms, with the overall objective of improving the criminal justice system.”

    The AGF explained that the event provided the opportunity to review, develop, enhance and collectively adopt the proposed legal and regulatory frameworks in support of restorative justice, including the Policy, Draft Bill, Practice Direction and Training Manual.

    He added: “These documents are the foundation upon which we aim to build a system that not only punishes wrongdoing, but also promotes healing for victims.

    “Restorative justice is an evolving approach to justice that seeks to repair harm by providing an opportunity for those harmed and the perpetrators to communicate and address needs in the aftermath of a crime. Restorative Justice gives offenders an opportunity to make amends and correct some of their wrongs and hurt which they may have caused to their victims.

    “Restorative justice will give victims an active role in the criminal justice process, reduce feelings of anxiety and powerlessness. While the traditional criminal justice process solely focuses on punishment for the offender, restorative justice focuses on victims and survivors who have been harmed by the conduct of the offender.

    Egbetokun, on his part, said:  he is ‘proud to champion the adoption of restorative justice principles in the criminal justice system’.

    “I am eager to work with stakeholders to ensure the successful implementation of the restorative principles that will foster a more compassionate and a more inclusive justice system for all,” he said.

    The IG noted that prior to the passage of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) in May 2015, there were no explicit provisions for restorative principles in the criminal justice system. Citing several provisions of the ACJA, Egbetokun noted that the law now contains various restorative alternatives, making the statutory provisions.

    According to him, the adoption of restorative principles represents a significant shift in the nation’s approach to justice, prioritizing healing and reintegration over punishment

    “This approach recognises the worth and dignity of every individual, victims, offenders and the community. It offers unique opportunity to foster a more compassionate and inclusive justice system, address the root causes of conflicts and crimes, promote accountability and responsibility, support victims’ recovery and empowerment, build safer and more harmonious communities,” he added.

    Justice Tsoho, represented by the Chief Registrar of the Federal High Court, Hassan Sulaiman, said the concept of restorative justice holds immense potentials for the nation’s legal framework.

    He noted: “It offers a path towards a more holistic approach to justice, one that prioritises healing, reconciliation and reintegration of offenders into the society.”

  • Give financial autonomy to judiciary, AGF tells governors

    Give financial autonomy to judiciary, AGF tells governors

    Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) yesterday urged governors to implement financial autonomy for the Judiciary.

    He said they could take advantage of the amendments to the Constitution to also develop their economies.

    The amendments, he noted, were effected through the Fifth Alteration Numbers 15, 16 and 17 Acts of 2023.

    The alterations devolved powers to states on correctional services, railways and power generation, transmission and distribution. 

    Fagbemi spoke in Abuja at the Body of Attorneys General (BOSAG) conference and meeting of the General Council of the Bar. 

    The AGF said: “In the light of these constitutional changes, it has become imperative for states of the federation to take maximum benefit of these constitutional alterations by developing their legal and policy frameworks on these legislative items… 

    “The effectiveness and functionality of the justice system have a direct effect on the overall development, stability and sustainability of any society. 

    “I urge my distinguished colleagues to ensure the full implementation of financial autonomy for the judiciary across our states as provided for under Section 121(3)&(4) of the Constitution, as a mark of our true and holistic commitment to the ideals of democracy and good governance. 

    “We should in this regard seek to robustly build the capacities of the Judiciary, both in terms of personnel and infrastructure, particularly by investing in technologies that are necessary to automate vital aspects of our court operations and ultimately implement a digital justice delivery system.”

    He said the Federal Government has put measures in place to prevent debt arising from judgments and arbitration proceedings against the government and its agencies.

    He explained that the initiative involves “a collaborative framework with specialist firms to enable legal officers involved in drafting memorandums of understanding (MOUs) and other forms of binding agreements to acquire required skills to identify possible areas of dispute or liability, which could lead to avoidable litigation or arbitration costs and judgement debt”. 

    Fagbemi also stressed the need to extend the anti-corruption war to the states.

    He added: “One of the lessons I learnt from the implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy, 2017/2022 is the need to ensure that the strategy is adopted and driven at the subnational level. 

    Read Also: Lawyers to CDS: judiciary not to blame for terror war setback

    “This is a move away from current efforts by anti-corruption strategies being driven solely by law enforcement and regulatory agencies at the federal level.”

    Chairman of the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, Senator Mohammed Monguno, said the 10th Senate was committed to embarking on multi-dimensional reforms capable of repositioning the Judiciary.

    He urged members of BOSAG to come up with ideas on existing laws to be amended and new ones to be enacted.

    Among them is whether the office of the attorney general should be split from the minister of/commissioner for justice.

    Senator Monguno added: “This meeting is apt given the current challenges which have bedevilled the judiciary and the need to, as a matter of urgency, address emerging legal issues affecting the nation.

    “This is with particular reference to conflicting judgments arising from election petition tribunals and the Court of Appeal in recent times; the implementation of the Data Protection Act 2023 and factors affecting the implementation of the Administration of the Criminal Justice Act 2015.”

    Chairman of the House Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, Olumide Osoba, urged members of BOSAG to ensure equity in access to justice by all Nigerians.

    He said: “It is our moral and constitutional duty to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their background or social status, have equal access to justice. 

    “We must strive to bridge the divide and promote a more inclusive, equitable and just society. Our goal should be to provide a justice system that is not only fair but also sensitive to the needs of the vulnerable in our society.

    “To achieve this, we need to adopt a multi-pronged approach that involves coordination and collaboration between all arms of government and civil society organizations. 

    “We need to invest in improving access to justice through legal aid, community-based paralegal services and technology-driven solutions. 

    “We must also work towards building trust and confidence in the justice system by engaging with marginalized communities and addressing their concerns. 

    “Another critical issue that we need to address is the disproportionate representation of minorities in the criminal justice system. 

    “Studies have shown that individuals from marginalised communities are more likely to be arrested, charged and sentenced to longer prison terms than their counterparts. 

    “This system of discrimination is unacceptable and runs counter to the principles of justice. 

    “We must also focus on addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty, inequality and social exclusion. 

    “By investing in education, healthcare, and social welfare, we can create a more inclusive and equitable society, thereby, reducing crime and improving access to justice.” 

  • AGF job: Tasks before Fagbemi

    AGF job: Tasks before Fagbemi

    Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) was sworn in yesterday as the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice. Lawyers tell ADEBISI ONAUGA their expections on the rule of law, rights enforcement, anti-graft war and pitfalls that he should avoid.

    Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) was among 45 ministers sworn in yesterday by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    Fagbemi is a respected jurist who has made significant contributions to the development of the legal profession. A lot is, therefore, expected of him.

    Many justice sector stakeholders believe he fits the bill.

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President, Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), said: “We have a brilliant AGF in Prince Fagbemi. I am convinced this will be a simple task for him.

    “He is a very good colleague and I have the highest confidence in his abilities.”

    Given his impressive qualifications and other enviable personal attributes, stakeholders believe he can initiate reforms to reshape the legal system.

    Read Also: Ibadan battle of lawyers: Lateef Fagbemi lifts trophy

    NBA President Yakubu Maikyau (SAN), who visited Fagbemi in Abuja on Friday, expressed the excitement of many lawyers about the appointment.

    He pledged the NBA’s support for the minister.

    Fagbemi said he was comforted to know that he had the support of the Bar. He urged Maikyau to present to the AGF’s office the NBA’s official position on law reforms and areas of improvement for the Judiciary.

    The man Fagbemi

    Prince Fagbemi, born in Oyun Local Government Area (LGA) of Kwara State, obtained his Bachelor of Laws (LL.B) from the University of Jos, Plateau State, with a Second Class Upper degree in 1984.

    He was called to the Bar in 1985, marking the beginning of his 38 years of flourishing legal career.

    In 1987, Fagbemi bagged a Master’s degree in Law (LLM) from the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.

    He cut his legal teeth and honed his skills under the tutelage of a renowned lawyer, Afe Babalola, for 11 years.

    Fagbemi was conferred with the rank of the Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) about 11 years into his law practice, making him the youngest member of the Inner Bar at 37.

    During the screening of ministerial nominees by the Senate on August 2, Fagbemi gave an insight into his perception of the anti-graft war and justice sector reform.

    He underscored the importance of thorough investigation before trial.

    He said: “We fight corruption but at the same time, the way it is being fought in Nigeria leaves much to be desired. That is the truth.”

    His response suggests that he understands that he will inherit an inefficient justice system that is grappling with corruption, disobedience to court orders, executive lawlessness and impunity by law enforcement and security agencies, among others.

    Most commended his suggestion on the splitting investigation and prosecution functions of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

    His view that both agencies should be unbundled for better performance was widely acclaimed.

    Pitfalls to avoid

    Immediate-past AGF, Abubakar Malami (SAN), was often in the public eye for some controversial decisions and comments.

    Some observers accused him, much like his boss former President Muhammadu Buhari, of disregard for the rule of law.

    It was under Malami that security agencies, on October 8, 2016, invaded the homes of judges at night. The allegations did not stand legal tests.

    There were inter-agency rivalries under him, while Malami was criticised for introducing what many considered a ridiculous dimension to the debate over the sustainability of open grazing of cattle.

    He also drew flak for his interventions in high-profile cases and in the Federal Government’s disregard of a Supreme Court order on the naira redesign.

    Stakeholders believe Fagbemi must avoid the pitfalls of his predecessor and chart a new path for himself and the justice sector.

    Some needed reforms, by Agbakoba

    Senior lawyers, including Dr Agbakoba, Chief Wale Taiwo (SAN), Chief Louis Alozie (SAN), Ahmed Raji (SAN), Wahab Shittu (SAN) and Managing Partner, Royal Practice LP, Ige Asemudara, offered tips to the minister.

    Dr Agbakoba said: “Major reforms of the criminal justice system with particular reference to the utter confusion in the duplicated work of our law enforcement agencies in particular EFCC and ICPC is urgently needed.

    “Also, there is a need to unbundle EFCC and restrict them to investigation only while a new national prosecution agency ought to be established.

    “Another key reform would be a completely decentralised police at local state and Federal levels.

    “Major revamp of our outdated laws is urgently needed to follow the Rwanda example that modified 1000 laws.

    “The AGF must work on speed of justice. It’s a crying shame it takes upwards of 15 years to conclude cases from the High Court to the Supreme Court.

    “He must create sector-specific dispute resolution agencies to free up the utterly cluttered dockets of the regular courts.

    “The other very important task before the Attorney-General will be the unnecessary and wholly inefficient matter of over-centralisation of our superior courts.

    “There is no better time than now to hack down the highly centralised court systems in Nigeria.

    “The AGF is invited to consider major constitutional amendments to create a system of Federal and state courts.

    “State courts ought to have exclusive jurisdiction over matters related to them.

    “This is also the case for Federal courts whose jurisdiction must be limited to Federal causes.

    “This will free up the clutter at the Supreme Court and make it the policy court it ought to be in the first place.

    “We have a brilliant AGF in Lateef Fagbemi SAN. Am convinced this will be a simple task for him. He is a very good colleague and I have the highest confidence in his abilities.”

    ‘Avoid abuse of legal process’

    Chief Taiwo noted that the office of the AGF is an ancient one that combines legal administration and the provision of independent legal advice with the political duties of being a member of the government.

    He said: “He is the Chief Law Officer of the Federation. In terms of clout, the AGF is amongst the closest advisers of the President and that is where the complications set in for the holder of the office.

    “This is because under Section 174(3) of the Constitution, in exercising his powers and functions of his office, ‘the Attorney-General of the Federation shall have regard to the public interest, the interest of justice and the need to prevent abuse of legal process.”’

    Taiwo noted that the fidelity of the AGF is to the Constitution and in exercising his powers and judgments, it must be in the interest of justice and adherence to due process.

    As to Fagbemi’s prospects for the job, he said: “I am particularly elated. I have known him for more than 40 years. We were called to the bar at the same time in 1985. He is a jurist of repute with a sense of justice.

    “His appointment is coming at a very critical moment given the recent history of the holders of that office.

    “I have confidence that the learned SAN will deliver and surpass expectations. It may be lame to attempt to set an agenda for the new Attorney-General but we can assist him by making historical parallels.”

    On how Fagbemi can succeed, Taiwo said: “We need the new AGF to embark on re-tooling the federal law enforcement framework.

    “Gladly, at his Senate screening, Prince Fagbemi alluded to the current untidy setup of agencies like both the EFCC and ICPC having investigatory and prosecutorial powers.

    “If he can succeed on that front, Nigeria will be better for it. It will not only strengthen the anti-graft war, but it will also help prevent abuse of legal processes in which the agencies have become notorious.”

    The SAN also advised the minister to champion law reforms.

    Taiwo said: “Again, I will cite another historical parallel that may help guide the new Attorney-General. The recently deceased Prince Bola Ajibola, SAN was for six years between 1985 and 1991 a moderating influence under the Babangida military regime.

    “Prince Ajibola as AGF embarked upon a law reform project that we still talk about today.

    “Some of the finest federal enactments (even though they were decrees) in the history of Nigeria came to be under his supervision. And he distinguished himself despite the headwinds of the anathema of a military regime.

    “Therefore, Prince Fagbemi could draw inspiration from both late revered jurists and bring about a paradigm shift in the Nigerian justice sector.

    “In fact, given the current state of our national security and myriad of socio-economic crises, I expect the new Attorney-General to champion law reforms to address the challenges to re-orientate our national well-being.

    “I know Prince Fagbemi as a stickler for rules, principles, and processes which have brought him this far. He is a truth-talker. I expect him to navigate the terrain of political gamesmanship in the best interest of the country which he is going to serve with distinction.”

    ‘Obey court orders’

    Chief Alozie noted that the Ministry of Justice represents the legal mind of the government and “has a duty to guide the government in its daily activities, to avoid arbitrariness and illegality”.

    “It is the job of the HAGF to ensure court orders are obeyed,” he added.

    The senior lawyer noted the many controversies that pervaded the judiciary landscape in the last eight years.

    He said: “What we saw in the past eight years is complete lawlessness. Justices of the Supreme Court were harassed, arrested, and arraigned in court without good reason. Some were not even charged. Their residencies were raided by nighttime.

    “DSS officers took over the illegal role of intimidating our Justices because of judgments they delivered. Since then, our superior courts have lost their independence. They operate in an atmosphere of fear of DSS & EFCC.

    “It is expected that arbitrariness and executive lawlessness should be things of the past. The business of government including the anti-graft war must be conducted in accordance with the law.

    “I pray that his tenure should bring a change in a positive direction. I also pray that as he leaves that office in the next four or eight years, he does so with his reputation intact.”

    ‘Act according to law’

    Shittu noted that since the constitution is founded on the rule of law, everything must be done according to law.

    “No one is above the law, and, in particular, that the government must comply with the law and that power is not exercised arbitrarily. It also requires that all persons have access to independent courts,” he said.

    Shittu pointed out that the AGF is responsible for upholding the rule of law. He said that given the enormous constitutional duties bestowed upon him by his office, it is expected that he should be ready to make himself unpopular by telling the executive to its face that it cannot embark on certain policies if incompatible with the law.

    The AGF must also refrain from attempting or the temptation of being politically right to the detriment of the letters of the law.

    He said as the AGF, his office should be able to direct, at all times and whether favourable to the government or not, immediate compliance with all court orders, for that is the first sign of a society governed by the rule of law, adding when court orders are obeyed, enforcement of people’s rights are guaranteed.

    On anti-graft war, Shittu advised that his watchwords should always be: “No one is above the law”. He said impartial application of the law is expected of him and that the law should be evenly handed among the government, its officials, agencies, ministries and citizens.

    “In advising the government as to the legality of its actions or a proposed policy, it is expected that the AGF must not twist the law to suit illegal action(s) of the executive, and in enforcing compliance with the laws of the land, the AGF is expected to be as blind as our lady justice”, Shittu added.

    The learned silk added that he expected the AGF to ensure that the constitutional rights of the citizens are respected and protected.

    He urged Prince Fagbemi to be courageous in sticking to due process, and transparency, and to support rather than undermine democratic institutions.

    Anti-graft war expectations

    Shittu, an EFCC prosecutor and law teacher, said he expects the AGF to “ensure transparency and accountability in the activities of the government; establish various mechanisms for the protection of whistleblowers who report the corruption of the powerful people in the nation; combat corruption nationally and across the border while adhering to international standards, and be at the forefront of combating corruption and bribery in the government, public organisations, and private industry, regardless of the people implicated in such cases”.

    Shittu urged the new AGF to refrain from exhibiting any bias, as hard as it may prove to be.

    “He should not allow political affiliations or pressures to interfere with his duties; and should be transparent in every decision-making process to avoid any form of miscarriage of justice.

    “He should not allow actions that violate the constitution, and should not turn a blind eye in a case of infringement of rights just because someone powerful is involved. He should avoid neglecting due process of law.”

    ‘Let law take its course’

    Asemudara, who is the founder of Mission Against Injustice in Nigeria (MAIN), urged Fagbemi to reactivate the anti-graft battle that appears to have lost steam.

    He said: “Prince Fagbemi is not swimming in strange waters. He understands the various nuances of law and what is required of him as the Chief Law Officer of the Federation.

    “On compliance with the rule of law, I do not have a doubt that he will ensure that what is right is always done.

    “There are pitfalls he needs to avoid. The Office of the AGF in the past was sometimes brought into great disrepute. A former AGF was once stripped of his honour.

    “The immediate-past AGF was also accused of supporting a new NBA and not enforcing the rule of law regarding the likes of Elzakzaky and Dasuki. There are those who believe Malami did not live up to the expected standard of that office.

    “We expect Prince Fagbemi to avoid those pitfalls. He should allow the law to take its course. He should drive the law to take its course.

    “The EFCC is becoming a toothless bulldog. The commission should be reactivated. Other anti-graft and law enforcement agencies should also be activated for optimum performance. We should see him working.

    “He’s not in a strange environment so I expect him to do well. Nigerians are expecting so much from the occupant of that office given the experience with the past.”

  • I’m open to criticism, says new AGF Fagbemi

    I’m open to criticism, says new AGF Fagbemi

    The Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) has said he is open to criticism.

    Fagbemi, who met with senior officials of the Federal Ministry of Justice (FMJ) upon his resumption on Monday, August 21, however, cautioned that such criticism must be constructive.

    Fagbemi said: “You can not just crtiticise. Your criticism must be constructive. You should be able to proffer solution and suggest better options.”

    He noted that the FMJ was critical to the success of the administration and the achievement of its objectives.

    He sought the cooperation of all and assured them of a harmonious relationship.

    Fagbemi, who is the nation’s 24th AGF, cautioned against acts of insubordination and urged officials of the ministry to be guided by their conscience and their oath of office.

    He urged the ministry’s officials to redouble their efforts in the discharge of their duties, adding that the office of the AGF in the country is strategic as it services all government Ministries, Department and Agencies (MDAs).

    Fagbemi, while noting that the ultimate goal of any lawyer was to become a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), noted that there are about three so far in the ministry, but assured that “before I leave office, we are going to have many more in the ministry.”

    Speaking earlier, the Solicitor General of the Federation and the Permanent Secretary, FMJ, Beatrice Jedy-Agba assured the AGF of the support of the ministry’s officials.

    She added: “We will deploy all the human and material resources of the ministry and its parastatals to support and assist you in realizing your set objectives, and more importantly, in achieving the enormous constitutional and statutory mandates and responsibilities vested in the Federal Ministry of Justice”.

    Jedy-Agba, who read Fagbemi’s profile, described him as a consumate professional and core-gentleman, who rose to the top echelon of the legal profession through hard work and tenacity.

  • Supreme Court decides Rivers APC’s fate Tuesday

    *To deliver judgement on Appeal Court’s decision voiding APC’s primaries
    *Strikes out Sen Abe’s appeal for stay of execution of Appeal Court’s judgment
    *Orders parties to return to Appeal Court

    Supreme Court will deliver judgements in the about six appeals by the two warring factions of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Rivers State.

    The appeals are mainly against the decision of the Court of Appeal in Port-Harcourt, which upheld the judgment of the High Court of Rivers State which voided the primaries conducted by the faction loyal to Rotimi Amechi and the other loyal to Senator Magnus Abe.

    A five-man panel of the Supreme Court, led by Justice Bode Rhodes-Vivour scheduled judgment for Tuesday after entertaining arguments, on Monday, from lawyer to the faction loyal to Amaechi, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) and Henry Bello, who represented the faction loyal to Abe.

    Fagbemi and Bello argued the appeal filed by the APC, in which the court said it will give judgment on Tuesday, and which will be binding on the other appeals.

    Fagbemi urged the court to void the judgement of the High Court on the ground that the trial court had no jurisdiction when it entertains the suit on which the judgment was given.

    He contended that since the trial court had no jurisdiction it’s judgement in the matter amount to a nullity and should be set aside.

    Fagbemi urged the court to invoke Section 22 of the Supreme Court Act and give final judgement to end the multiple cases arising from the rivers state APC primary election.

    Read Also: Supreme Court did not bar Rivers APC, says Senator Uchendu

    Bello, in his counter-argument, urged the apex court to dismiss the appeal of the APC on the ground that it has become a mere academic in nature in view of an earlier decision by the court.

    He contended that by the decision of the court on February 8, 2019 which upheld the order of the High Court, restraining APC in Rivers State from conducting any primary election, the current appeal by APC had died and should be buried.

    Bello told the court that the respondents, led by Ibrahim Umar, who were aggrieved by the violation of the Electoral Act and the Constitution in the manner the APC conducted its pre-election matters in Rivers, had secured a consent judgement in their favour, a judgment, he insisted, still stands.

    He urged the court that to hold instant appeal has become academic exercise.

    At the conclusion of arguments by parties, Justice Rhodes-Vivour frowned at the multiple appeals filed by both factions of the APC in Rivers on a single issue.

    He said the multiple appeals were not only time wasting they were capable of confusing the court.

    Meanwhile, the Supreme, on Monday, struck out an appeal filed by Senator Magnus Abe against the stay of execution of the judgment of the federal high court, which nullified the nomination of Tonye Cole and others as candidates the APC in Rivers State in the general election.

    The court upheld the argument by lawyer to the APC, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN).

    Fagbemi had argued that the records of proceedings at the lower court, filed by Senator Abe did not follow the rules of the Appeal Court to certify the said documents.

    Ruling Justice Rhodes-Vivour noted that only a few of pages of the records of appeal were signed.
    He said since most of the pages were not signed, it could be interpreted that they were Senator Abe’s personal documents.

    Justice Rhodes-Vivour ordered parties to the appeal back to the Court of Appeal for the determination of the substantive appeal.

    Abe had appealed an interlocutory decision of the Court of Appeal, which stayed the execution of the judgment of the High Court which nullified the primaries of the APC in Rivers State

  • Supreme Court ruling: ‘Ignore Abe, allies’ misrepresentation of facts’

    The Rivers State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has urged Rivers people and other lovers of democracy to ignore Senator Magnus Abe (Rivers Southeast) and his allies for misrepresentation of facts on Friday’s Supreme Court ruling, insisting that the candidacy of Pastor Tonye Cole and others of APC is not imperilled.

    Cole, a pastor of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), who is a co-founder of Sahara Group, still expressed optimism that he and other candidates of APC in Rivers would be on the ballot for this year’s elections and they would emerge victorious.

    The justices of Supreme Court, Friday, ruled on APC’s legal representation in the suit at the Rivers State High Court, Port Harcourt, presided over by Justice Chinwendu Nwogu.

    The apex court declared that the Legal Adviser of Rivers APC, Chinweikpe Chieme, not Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, was the main opposition party in the state and that the judgment of Justice Nwogu was a consent judgment.

    Rivers APC, through its Publicity Secretary, Chris Finebone, Friday said: “The attention of Rivers State chapter of APC has been drawn to a myriad of reports making the rounds on the social media, giving conflicting, and in some cases, outright mischievous narratives, misinterpreting and misrepresenting the pronouncement of the Supreme Court of Friday, February 8, 2019, on the matter between Ibrahim Umar and 22 others versus Rivers APC.

    Read Also: Supreme Court voids Appeal Court’s judgment on Rivers APC

    “Whereas the Rivers APC is reluctant to take issues with anyone when it concerns matters before the court, however, we believe that members of the public deserve to be protected from calculated mischief and misinformation, especially those dispensed through the social media and rumours. Therefore, it has become highly necessary to re-state what transpired at the Supreme Court.

    “The apex court ruled that, in line with provisions of the Constitution of the APC, the chapter’s legal adviser at the time the matter commenced, Mr. Chieme Chinweikpe, rightly represented the party directly or through legal appointees of his, instead of Mr. Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, who was seconded by the Legal Department of national headquarters of APC. This means that the judgment given by Justice Chinwendu Nwogu was a consent judgment following thereto.

    “Irrespective of how we feel about the pronouncement, the Rivers State chapter of APC has to accept that decision, having come from the highest court of the land.

    “We make haste to, however; state that the decision on legal representation was the only matter the Supreme Court made pronouncement on Friday. We expect the apex court to rule on the all-important issue of jurisdiction of whether the Rivers State High Court of Justice Chinwendu Nwogu was right to delve into what we believe was an internal affair of the APC, with regards to primaries.

    “We urge the mainstream media and innocent members of the public to resist the lure of mischievous individuals, who are inundating the social media and entire cyberspace with jaundiced versions of the Supreme Court ruling or churning out outright fake news, with a view to deceiving the public, deluding themselves with short-lived comfort and feathering their nests from their paymasters.

    “We are convinced that no harm has been done to the candidacy of our governorship candidate, Pastor Tonye Cole, and the others. We believe that, by the grace of God, we shall triumph and ultimately be on the ballot for the 2019 elections.”

    The main opposition APC also called on the teeming supporters of the party in Rivers to remain calm, while assuring that it would surely end in praise and declared that candidates of APC in the state would surely be on the ballot and go ahead to win on February 16 and March 2, 2019.

    The Director, Strategic Communications of Tonye Cole/Victor Giadom Campaign Organisation of APC, Prince Tonye Princewill, said in his reaction Friday evening: “I have just spoken with our lawyers. The judgement is nothing to overly concern ourselves over. I thought it was worse when I heard that the Nyesom Wike (of People’s Democratic Party) and Magnus Abe’s camps were celebrating.

    “After the defeats, they (Wike and Abe) suffered in recent weeks, any news is good news for them. Our two appeal court judgments remain valid. No one else has been declared candidate and the substantive matter has not even been touched. That will be coming up on Monday. So, no cause for alarm.”

    The Spokesman of Cole/Giadom campaign organisation, Ogbonna Nwuke, a former member of the House of Representatives, while also reacting, declared that the celebrations by Wike, Abe and their drowning supporters would soon turn to sorrow, while expressing confidence that justice would be ensured by the courts.

    Nwuke, an ex-Rivers Commissioner for Information, said: “Our attention has been drawn to reports which suggest that Ibrahim Umar and 22 others have secured a final determination at the Supreme Court.

    “The fact available to us is that the only issue determined on Friday, February 8, 2019 was that of legal representation, which had been in contention.

    “Based on the various conflicting headlines being carried, it is critical to state that there are other pending matters, including the substantive appeal, which is yet to be determined by the Supreme Court. Our faith in the judiciary remains unshaken.

    “We wish to urge our numerous supporters not to panic, following the deliberate misrepresentation of facts on the social media and elsewhere, regarding the outcome of the ruling. We shall surely be triumphant in the end.”

    Contrary to insinuations making the round, the Supreme Court, Friday, never pronounced Abe and candidates of his faction, who emerged through direct primary election, not supervised by officials of the national secretariat of APC, as authentic candidates of the party, while Prince Peter Odile, whom Abe announced as Rivers APC state chairman of his faction, was not recognised by the apex court.

  • APC’s lawyer stalls hearing in suit seeking Akeredolu’s sack

    The planned commencement of trial in the suit seeking the sack of Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu of Ondo State was stalled on Friday owing to the absence of Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), lawyer to the APC and its Chairman.

    A Federal High Court in Abuja had on December 11 last year adjourned the case, filed by APC chieftain, Olusegun Abraham, to January 15 this year for hearing. But, upon request by lawyers in the case, the court rescheduled the case to January 18 for trial.

    When the case was called on Friday, Muritata Abdulrasheed, who announced appearance for the APC and its Chairman (1st and 3rd defendants), informed the court that the lead lawyer for his clients, Fagbemi was absent in court because he was bereaved and had travelled to Kwara State for his auntie’s burial.

    Abdulrasheed, who said he was informed about the development on Friday morning, said he could not handle the case in the absence of the leader of his team, who he said participated in the pre-trial meetings. He sought an adjournment.

    Lawyers to Abraham and Akeredolu, Akin Oujinmi (SAN) and Professor Joash Amupitan (SAN) confirmed the development and agreed to the request for adjournment.

    Read Also: Lawyer advocates legislation on vocational education

    Abraham, who was the 1st runner-up in the APC governorship primary in Ondo State in 2016, is by the suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/788/2016, challenging Akeredolu’s emergence as the winner of the primary and the party’s candidate for the last governorship election in the state.

    Abraham alleged that the primary was manipulated to favour Akeredolu and wants the court to nullify the outcome of the primary and pronounce him (Abraham). As the winner of the primary and the party’s candidate for the election.

    Defendants in the case are the APC, Akeredolu, APC Chairman and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Details later.