Tag: Lawmakers

  • Holding our lawmakers accountable

    …We may call them also to book a tour of the national assembly structures… not to see where our money is going (we’ll never see that) but to at least see where our lawmakers plant their behinds when they are debating those bills we know nothing about

    Last week, dear reader, we lamented the fate of one Mrs. Egede who fell in the hands of a brute; and we went to town on how the collective leadership of this country, executive and legislative, had contributed to her death. Sometime in the week, I then chanced on a newspaper report about a United States Congresswoman who gave us a lesson in Nigeria on how and why we must hold our lawmakers accountable. Oh yes, she also lamented that the said lawmakers had not done much, if anything, to help our Chibok girls come back home.

     Truly, I have found it rather baffling that it is taking this long to find these blessed saints of God. What, I ask myself, are our more than fifty million men in this country doing if they cannot find these girls? What are they all going to do at work in their newspaper offices, police posts, army cantonments, corporate offices, fire stations, mechanics’ workshops, university classrooms, national assembly, etc., when they cannot find a number of missing girls? Why, let supper be late a few minutes, the men begin to holler across the hall, ‘what is going on in that kitchen? Why is supper so late? What have you been doing all day?’ Um hun; now, our girls are missing and our men are hiding behind their newspapers. Oh, no more newspapers these days, eh, only cell phones? Prima.

    I will not report the theories I have been hearing over these ‘missing girls’ story. They are so many. Suffice it to say that they are not palatable in any way. Of greater concern to us today is this matter of how we can make our assemblymen and women begin to hear us when we holler across to them on any matter. For instance, when I look down my palm and my housekeeping money has disappeared into the market (no, not into my wardrobe), I should be able to holler to my councilman, state assemblyman, Federal Representative or Senator, and they must hear me and also do something. They must all scurry to my aid. Ha!, in Nigeria you say? That’ll be the day!

    I tell you, I have always said Nigerians are biting more than they can chew on this democracy thing. For starters, please if you understand the democratic system we are running and the way it is supposed to work, please raise up your hand. Let’s see, one….one…one… What, only my hand is up? I was using it to count. Seriously, the level of democratic literacy in this country is too low.

    Do you remember that at the beginning of this republic, every elected official found his way to the U.S. ostensibly to ‘study the democratic system’ and how it works at state expense? The idea was that they would come back and put their knowledge into good practice for the benefit of the Nigerian mankind. Unfortunately, they came back with close to zero knowledge on democratic education but with a great deal of knowledge on something they call ‘lobbying’. In Nigerian parlance, it means sharing office. Now, occupying those offices, our lawmakers have become our masters.

    Anyway, my point is that they failed to take the electorate along on those trips so that we could also learn how to have expectations in this democracy thing. Since that did not happen, we the electorate have somehow got on in the best way we can. Thus, our expectations have been directed not at statecraft or state development but self-development. Now, what we expect from those lawmakers that come from our families hinges mostly on favours regarding what to eat, admission for our children, raising the marks of our children, adding to our housing funds, changing stubborn wives, changing useless husbands, buying new cell phones, new shoes, new cars, etc. Yep, they are useful after all, I mean the lawmakers. The only problem is that they escape with most of the funds that are supposed to be used to provide water, electricity, good  One Reader’s Digest article I read on the subject was very detailed on the five or so things that we are expected to call our lawmakers on and for. It says that we are expected to call them to ‘express our opinion’, particularly on bills. I add that we can also tell them what we think of them. I would advise that you be at least ten thousand miles away when you do the latter one. Anyways, to do the first one, you must know what bills are being debated in the house in the first place. Since most of us are more occupied with what we will eat, however, what goes on in the assembly really does not feature much on the menu.

    The article further stated that we should call our lawmakers more often because they can help us get our passports faster, particularly when we need to travel urgently. Well, since most of us don’t travel any farther than our villages to hunt game for holidays, we don’t carry passports. The animals don’t ask for passports before allowing us to shoot them. When they begin to ask, then we’ll know what to do. However, this does not mean we should not call our lawmakers when we have emergencies; we should. Please call them when food runs out in the house, your husband is late coming home, your wife refuses to cook dinner… Perhaps, calling them frequently will reduce the number of people desperate to become lawmakers.

    We are also advised to call them when we need help getting our benefits such as social security (we don’t have that here) or veterans (they literally take care of themselves) or pensions. Now, you’re talking. We need all the help we can get on how we can quickly collect our pensions or even health benefits. As a matter of fact, I foresee a situation where if our lawmakers cannot help us access those things quickly, they themselves can quickly become our health or pensions benefits.

    Then the article says we can call our beloved lawmakers to obtain funds for projects. Take me for instance; I’m always on one project or the other. Right now, I am trying to get my flower to grow into a tree. So sorry, I shouldn’t joke too much with this serious topic. Yes, there are so many projects that can do with some help from our lawmakers – e.g. how to make the government ban okada from taking pregnant women or nursing mothers as fares. In other words, there should be no more picking children on okada. The article says lawmakers usually know about federal grants for projects. Well, with the rapacious appetite of our lawmakers for the nation’s money since 1999, all I can say is that if you know about such grants, it is best not to let your lawmaker know.

     By all means, we need to call our lawmakers. We need to put them on their toes. We need to let them know that we are around and kicking mad at the fact that they don’t seem to want to know we are around. If for nothing else, we may call them also, as the article says, to book a tour of the national assembly structures. We may want to go to the assembly not to see where our money is going (we’ll never see that) but to at least see where our lawmakers plant their behinds when they are debating those bills we know nothing about. Call yours now. I will call mine just as soon as I know who exactly my councilman is… Yes sir, I have to start from somewhere.

  • Gombe lawmakers tackle clashes

    Gombe lawmakers tackle clashes

    Members of Gombe State House of Assembly have waded into the land crisis in the southern district of the state. Clashes over land in such councils as Balanga, Billiri, Kaltungo and Shongom have led to deaths, injuries and arson among other fallouts.

    Worried by these incessant clashes, the member representing Billiri South constituency in state House of Assembly, Honourable Rambi Ibrahim Ayala moved a motion seeking a clear-cut demarcation of boundaries in the district as a way of ending the bloodshed.

    Ayala who chairs the House Committee on Land and Water Resources also called for the reinforcement of security in the affected areas.

    He said: “Despite the relative peace enjoyed by the people in the state irrespective of their diverse backgrounds…communal clashes in some parts of the state have continued to rear [their] ugly head leading to many loss of lives, and thereby disrupting economic activities in those areas. We have a responsibility to our young ebullient and dynamic state to serve as a fountain that will quench the ravaging conflagration of ethnic strife in our state.

    “As we are all aware, the unresolved land boundary disputes in some parts of the state have given rise to skirmishes as recently witnessed amongst the inhabitants of Kaltungo, Shongom, and Billiri local governments of the state, which has led to unavoidable loss of lives and property. Therefore, we cannot continue to remain complacent as in the case during the Holocaust”.

    Ayala said he urged the House to send a delegation to the affected communities and mobilise their elders to enlighten the residents on peace.

    He praised Governor Ibrahim Dankwambo’s efforts in containing insecurity and enshrining the culture of peaceful coexistence in the state.

    Inspired by the Ayala motion, the state House of Assembly constituted a joint committee on security and land to look into the matter and report to the House.

    The most recent of such tension heightening contentions over farmland was the fierce fighting at Poshiya village in Billiri local government area which led to the death of the Dean of Academics, Evangelical Church Winning All (ECWA) Theological Seminary popularly known as Kufai, Reverend Emmanuel Joshua.

    The conflict which occurred around mid-June 2015 reduced Poshiya village to a ghost town as all the villagers fled their homes and went into hiding due to fear of more attack from their opponents in Shongom local government Area which shares the same border with Poshiya.

    Reverend Joshua had hired some women to clear a farmland for him to cultivate but the women were sent away by Shongom people.

    Next, the clergy went himself to ask why his hirelings were chased out. He was waylaid and killed.

     

    The clash also consumed Seminary’s Liberian, Agabus Abona and two others, leaving several others with injury.

    Spokesperson of Gombe State Police Command, Deputy Superintendent Fwaji Atajiri said the command immediately deployed a team of mobile policemen to the area to deal with the situation but did not make any arrest so as not to escalate the problem.

    Gombe state Deputy Governor, Honourable Charles Iliya visited the area to pacify the communities, urging the leaders to prevail on their youths to sheathe their swords.

    The Dagaci (Village Head) of Poshiya, Mr. Dedan Kamasco expressed his disappointment over the clash.

    He said they have documents of a court ruling apportioning the disputed area to his community and wondered why their opponents would not just accede to a court ruling.

     

  • PDP, lawmakers: DSS invasion of Akwa Ibom Govt House is terrorism

    PDP, lawmakers: DSS invasion of Akwa Ibom Govt House is terrorism

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)  and members of the Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly  have described Friday’s invasion of part of the Akwa Ibom Government House by operatives of the Department of State Service (DSS) as an act of terrorism.

    The PDP said it would no longer stomach the continued unlawful use of the state apparatus of power by the All Progressives Congress (APC) -led Federal Government to harass its elected officials at any level across the country.

    A statement yesterday by the PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Olisa Metuh, said the DSS crossed the red line by invading and occupying the Akwa Ibom State Government House, Uyo, in violation of the constitutional immunity of the Government House.

    The PDP cautioned that the invasion and other flagrant abuse of power by the APC-led Federal Government were clear recipes for constitutional crisis, civil unrest and avoidable anarchy. It called on Nigerians and the international community to take copious note of the development.

    The party said its investigations showed that the DSS acted on orders from the Presidency, “which has been in a desperate bid to destabilise and forcefully take over Akwa Ibom and other PDP states”.

    The 26 members of the House of Assembly said the invasion was not only in breach of the constitution but an affront on the rights of the governor, who is the chief security officer of the state.

    The 26 lawmakers, at a news conference yesterday in Abuja, gave the DSS seven days ultimatum to apologise or risk being slammed with a legal action.

    The Speaker, Aniekan Uko, who read the statement,  was supported by the 25 members of the House of Assembly and some federal lawmakers.

    Uko said: “Since the Constitution has clearly freed the governor from being brought under court warrant in the discharge of his legitimate duties, it is on record that before embarking on that ill-advised operation, the SSS never communicated with the governor of Akwa Ibom State, who is also the chief security officer of the state, on why it was necessary to search his official residence in Uyo.

    “For the avoidance of doubt, Section 308 (1, 2, 3) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) provides as follows:

    “(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Constitution, but subject to subsection (2) of this section:

    “a) no civil or criminal proceedings shall be instituted or continued against a person to whom this section applies during his period of office;

    “b) a person to whom this section applies shall not be arrested or imprisoned during that period either in pursuance of the process of any court or otherwise;

    “and c) no process of any court requiring or compelling the appearance of a person to whom this section applies, shall be applied for or issued: Provided that in ascertaining whether any period of limitation has expired for the purposes of any proceedings against a person to whom this section applies, no account shall be taken of his period of office.

    “(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to civil proceedings against a person to whom this section applies in his official capacity or to civil or criminal proceedings in which such a person is only a nominal party.

    “(3) This section applies to a person holding the Office of President or Vice-President, Governor or Deputy Governor; and the reference in this section to “period of office” is a reference to the period during which the person holding such office is required to perform the functions of the office.

    “It is important to point out that immunity from prosecution and persecution is a well-founded, well-reasoned concept, which has sundry benefits when applied honestly and carefully for the greater good of society. It thus means that a governor or President, during the subsistence of term of office, must have a free hand to act boldly and courageously for public good.

    “In doing so, such a governor or President would not be hindered by fear for self, for repercussion of actions embarked upon, for the public interest of a state or for clearly defined national interests.

    “Unfortunately, while the President, the Vice President as well as the governors and deputy governors across the country are protected under Constitutional Immunity, the governor of Akwa Ibom State has been singled out and stripped of this right which provided for him under the law”.

  • ‘Frequent recess by lawmakers not unusual’

    The National Institute for Legislative Studies (NILS) has said the frequency with which members of the National Assembly go on recess is not unusual and will not affect the enactment of laws.

    Director-General of the institute, Dr Ladi Hamalai, said this at a News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) Forum in Abuja yesterday.

    Hamalai, who was reacting to criticisms of the breaks by the lawmakers in the media, said, “unless you want that of the 8th National Assembly to be different, I don’t see any problem“.

    “You can’t stop plenary sessions because some members have to go on assignment abroad; some members take one or two weeks off to go on oversight visits.

    “Maybe a committee of 30 in the House of Reps, for example, goes on oversight visits taking one, two weeks; do you stop plenary because of that? No! You can’t stop plenary because of that.

    “So you will perpetually have a situation where some members will be absent doing other assignments.

    “I’m not saying that that is the only reason for absence of members; No! There may be other private reasons, genuine private reasons.

    “In a nutshell what I’m saying is that the behaviour of legislators in the National Assembly is normal.“

    According to her, it is the norm all over the world for lawmakers to go on recess.

    Hamalai also said that in other climes it was acceptable for legislators to use their mobile devices to register their presence at plenary as they “do not have to attend plenary always“.

    “There is no parliament in the world where you have full attendance at plenary and committee meetings. In South Korea you can even vote using your mobile phone.

    “They have a secure mobile platform for legislative work. You can listen in to whatever is going on in the chambers and vote wherever you are,“ she said.

  • PDP lawmakers promise credible opposition

    PDP lawmakers promise credible opposition

    Members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the House of Representatives have promised to engage the Federal Government constructively.

    The lawmakers said although being in the opposition was to them, having been ruling since 1999, the caucus vowed to provide a credible opposition in the House.

    However, while backing  President Muhammadu Buhari’s anti-corruption drive, its media group, led by Shawulu Rima (PDP, Taraba), told reporters in Abuja yesterday that the President had no right to define the period of his investigation of corrupt officials.

    Rima, who was with other members of the group, said: “We, in the PDP, played a key role in the emergence of the House Leadership. Majority of our members voted for the Speaker, Yakubu Dogara and his deputy, Suleiman Lasun, and we are happy with the way they have  conducted affairs of the House.

    “We will continue to support them. We are not going to indulge in frivolous criticisms, we will support the government and will be a credible opposition.

    “We are not going to behave as area boys in criticising government. We won’t take actions as if we have a predetermined position, which can destroy the system”.

    Noting that the investigation of corrupt official was a welcome development, Rima, however, said the caucus would not accept the investigation limited to certain individuals or the last administration.

    “We support the agenda of the Federal Government to fight corruption; however we want the probe to be all-inclusive since there is no status of limitation to a crime.

    “The President does not have the power to draw a line on the particular crimes he will prosecute. If he does that, he will be flouting a section of the constitution.

    “We caution the present administration to learn from the mistake of the then opposition in Ghana, which came to power and started prosecuting but lost out in national development, which led to its defeat in the subsequent election”.

  • Lawmakers and their jumbo pay

    Lawmakers and their jumbo pay

    Senators are under attack over the rejection of pay cut. Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN examines the implications of the senators’ decision on the nation’s economy and the  integrity of the National Assembly.

    Nigerians are angry with the senators for rejecting a pay cut as recommended by the Finance Committee of the National Assembly. Prominent opinion leaders expressed shock that the lawmakers are not bothered about the parlous state of the nation’s economy. They said the law makers insistence on the jumbo salaries, shows they are insensitive to the plight of average Nigerians who  have been short changed by those entrusted  with the commonwealth.

    The salaries and allowances of the National Assembly members have been subject of debate over the years. Many believe it was outrageous when compared to what their counterparts in other climes earn. Others argued that Nigerian economy can’t sustain it.  Though the basic salary of the National Assembly members is not in contest but the outrageous allowances they fixed for themselves. The mind bogging allowances include: Accommodation (Senator N4m, Rep N3.9m); Vehicle loan (Senator N8m, Rep N7.94m); Furniture (Senator N6m, Rep N5.9m); severance gratuity (Senator N6m, N5.9m).

    They also include motor vehicle fuelling and maintenance (Senator N1.5m, Rep N1.4m); constituency (Senator N5m, Rep N1.9m);  domestic staff (Senator N1.5m, Rep N1.4m) Personal Assistant  (Senator N506, 600, Rep N496, 303); Entertainment (Senator N607, 920, Rep N595, 563); recess (Senator N202, 640, Rep N198, 521); utilities (Senator N607, 920, Rep N397, 042); newspapers/periodicals (Senator N303, 960, Rep N297, 781), house maintenance (Senator N101, 320, RepN99, 260) and wardrobe (Senator N506, 600, Rep N496, 303). Other allowances are estacode (Senator $950, Rep $900) and duty tour allowance (Senator N37,000, Rep N35,000).

    Analysts said the eighth National Assembly largely dominated by members of the All Progressives Congress (APC), who rode to power on the vehicle of change, are insisting that the old order must be maintained. They explained that the change Nigerians want is the change that would rejuvenate the prostrate economy, the change that would revamp country’s battered image, the change that would rekindle ordinary Nigerians hope in the country and strengthen his resolve to work for and defend the country that must immediately begin with members of the National Assembly adding the change must be seen in their salaries and allowances.

    Irked by the Senators reaction, Second Republic law maker, Dr Junaid Muhammed castigated them for what he described as insensitivity to the general feelings of the populace to their opulent life style which is at variance with the economic situation in the country.

    Mohammed lamented that the 1979 and 1999 Constitutions made provisions for the members of National Assembly to fix their salaries and allowances. “It was a mistake that the 1979 and 1999 Constitutions empower the law makers to fix their salaries and allowances. In a normal society or a matured democracy, you don’t allow members of legislature to fix their salaries.

    “In a civilised and rational society, the nation pays the people including law makers, based on the content of the service rendered and what the nation’s economy can afford. There is no justification for the outrageous salaries and allowances fixed by them. When the economy nose dive, the normal thing to do is to cut down the expenses and plug all the leakages in the system so that the nation do not go bankrupt.

    “As a matter of policy, the salaries and allowances of the National Assembly members must relate to what is being paid to other workers in the economy in relation to what is obtained in advanced democracies like the United States of America, Britain, France, Germany and Canada among others. Paying Nigeria Senators salaries higher than what President Obama of US earns is senseless. The United States is the most powerful country and the largest economy in the world”.

    The Kano born politician said: “What I expect from the Senators is to set in motion the machinery for downward review of their salaries and allowances. Anything short of that will portray them as greedy people who care less about the well being of the country and the down trodden who bear the brunt of economic mismanagement and financial recklessness of the few who found themselves in leadership position”.

    The Executive Director, Conscience Nigeria, Mr Tosin Adeyanju, was upset by the senators reaction to pay cut. He recalled that in 2013, “the National Assembly allocation and budget was about N50 billion; by 2015, it has astronautically jumped to about N120 billion for just 469 people. This is not justifiable in a country that has over 180 million people, and in a nation that is in economic crises with huge dependence on oil revenue that has dipped by 50 per cent”

    The civil rights activist noted that Nigerian law makers were the highest paid in the world and demanded 60 per cent cut in their pay package. According to him, with a national minimum wage of N18,000 per month totalling N216,000 per annum, it will take an average Nigerian worker 60 years to earn the annual salary and allowances of a Nigerian Senator. This is not right and something urgent has to be done to slash the salaries and allowances of the law makers. The demand is imperative in view of the number of Nigerians living in poverty and the country’s revenue, he said.

    In the same vein, the former Secretary-General of the Commonwealth, Chief Emeka Anyaoku has called for  the downward review of the National Assembly Members pay. According to him, the Nigerian law makers were the highest paid law makers in the world. Nigerian lawmakers earn more than their counterparts in the United States, China, Britain, Japan and Canada, among others, he asserted.

    Constitutional lawyer Professor Itse Sagay (SAN) described the rejection of the pay cut by the senators as selfish. He said there has been so much talk about their allowances and one should ordinarily expect them to do something and succumb to the public demand. Instead, they have been consistent in their attitude of not being concerned about the interest of the country but their personal interests, he observed.

    Sagay noted that “there are six or seven items on their list of allowances that they should remove, for instance, the wardrobe allowance. As a man with wife and children, is it not an embarrassment for me to be waiting for government to clothe me?

    “Their actions are tantamount to exploiting and squeezing blood out of the nation. I think we have to decide whether our National Assembly should work on part-time and paid allowances based on the number of times they sit as it was the case during the First Republic. The allowances they are collecting are unrealistic in a developing country like Nigeria. If we cannot iron it out now, we can embark on it in the next dispensation. It should be a campaign issue in the next election.”

    Stressing the need for a 60 per cent wage cut for the law makers, Adeyanju said: “We need to save Nigeria from imminent collapse in order not to turn it into another Greece. Political position must be made less attractive; the country needs a unicameral and not bicameral legislation”.

    Following the 50 per cent pay cut announced by President Muhammadu Buhari for himself, the Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, and the presidential aides, the expectation of many Nigerians was that the National Assembly members would follow suit. Public Affairs analyst Dr Alex Otitoloju said it was disheartening to hear the Senators seeking to maintain the status quo.

    Otitoloju said this attitude surely portrays the law makers as not being on the same page with the president. It is very dangerous to the overall wellbeing of the country, especially the President’s commitment towards resuscitating the economy. Any member of the National Assembly that fails to follow the good example demonstrated by President Buhari is peoples’ enemy and should be treated as a saboteur.

    He was disturbed by the reports that the APC law makers in the National Assembly are resisting the change mantra of the Buhari administration and insisting that the older must be maintained.  He faulted the argument of the law makers that they use part of their allowances to empower members of their constituencies. “Law makers are not father Xmas. They are not elected to dole out money to their constituents; they are expected to offer quality representation, make laws for good governance and facilitate developmental projects to their constituencies.

    “The law makers cannot afford not to be part of or even lead the change that would guaranty quality standard of living for the poor and abandoned ordinary citizens of the country who have over the years being the victims of the tiny but powerful people who have continued to misrule the country.”

    Former Chairman of the Nigeria Bar Association,(NBA) Mr  Monday Ubani was furious over what he described as fabulous salaries and allowances being drawn by the law makers for doing nothing. He noted that each senator has collected N36.4 million and House of Rep member N17m as housing furniture and transport allowances. In the past two and half months, these law makers have not passed a single law, yet the nation had to expend almost N13 billion for their personal comfort.

    “How would you expect such people to accept pay cut? They are very selfish; they are not interested in the well being of the nation and the people. They did not work for one week, they have collected colossal sum of money for doing nothing. The total cost on legislative is alarming; it constitutes a drain pipe on the nation’s economy. It is a big mistake that the constitution allows the law makers to fix their salaries and allowances.”

    Ubani suggested that there should be an arrangement to make the National Assembly and other elective positions less attractive to maintain modesty in salaries and allowances. “We have states that cannot pay salaries and the law makers in the National Assembly want to live fat at the expense of the masses. I believe time will sort everything out”, he added.

  • Osun financial crisis: ‎Aregbesola, lawmakers hold conference

    Osun financial crisis: ‎Aregbesola, lawmakers hold conference

    Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola and the state and national assembly lawmakers are set to meet to proffer an enduring solution to the financial challenges facing the state.

    At a press briefing during the weekend in Osogbo, Osun state capital, a lawmaker, representing Ayedade/Isokan/Irewole federal constituency in the House of Representatives, Hon. Mrs. Ayo Omidiran, disclosed that meeting tagged Osun Stakeholders Conference‎ is scheduled to hold Monday.

    Omidiran in company of other lawmakers, including Hon. Ajibola Famurewa, representing Ile East/West and Atakumosa East/West federal constituency, Hon, Mojeed Alabi, repenting Iwo/Ola-Oluwa/Ejigbo federal constituency, and Hon. Bosun Oyintiloye, representing Obokun state, constituency, ‎disclosed that not less than 1000 stakeholders from the state will attend the conference.

    According to her, technocrats, former governors of the state and their deputies, formers speakers of both the national and state House of Assemblies, traditional rulers, labour unions, NGOs, religious leaders, elder statesmen, leaders of the opposition party (PDP), market women among others have been invited to the conference.

    She noted that the National Assembly members under the aegis of Osun Legislators Forum initiated the meeting.

    Omidiran said the conference was necessary following the financial crisis facing the stat over the months as result of incessant industrial actions over non-payment of salaries as well as abandonment of the gigantic projects that the governor has embarked upon to actualise the mega city vision in the state.

    She said: “We realised that the times are very hard for our people in the state. Whatever we are doing in Abuja, if our people are not happy, we too cannot be happy. It then means that the laws we are making won’t make sense. We want to let our people know that we are committed to their wellbeing.

    “The conference will present an opportunity for all stakeholders to hear from the horse’s mouth on how we got to this sorry pass. Governor Rauf Aregbesola will explain in clear terms during his submission the what, when, why and how. He will answer all our questions and lay all his cards on the table.

    “Stakeholders are expected to contribute intellectually through submissions based on facts and experiences so that at the end of the submit, we shall, together, and by the grace of God, proffer lasting solutions to the myriads of problems confronting our dear state.”

    Omidiran also disclosed that the recommendations from the summit would be submitted to the government which has the prerogative for implementation.

  • Court rejects Saraki’s protest against Senate forgery suit

    Court rejects Saraki’s protest against Senate forgery suit

    A Federal High Court in Abuja Wednesday rejected a complaint by Senate President, Bukola Saraki against a suit seeking to sack him and other principal officers of the Senate elected under the controversial Senate Standing Orders 2015.

    His lawyer, Sikiru Oke told the court that he appeared for the Senate President “in protest” and has not filed “memorandum of appearance” which must be filed before a lawyer could enter appearance for a party in a case.

    The proceedings were in relation to a suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/651/2015 filed by senators who are opposed to the emergence of Saraki as the Senate President.

    They are Senators Abu Ibrahim, Kabir Marafa, Ajayi Boroffice, Olugbenga Ashafa and Suleiman Hunkuni. Defendants to the suit are Saraki, Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu; the National Assembly, the Clerks of the National Assembly and the Senate.

    The plaintiffs seek among other prayers and order nullifying the Senate Standing Orders 2015 as well as the election of Saraki as the Senate President and that of Ike Ekweremadu as the Deputy Senate President, ‎for being products of the alleged illegal rules.

    Justice Gabriel Kolawole had at the last hearing in the case, (July 28, 2015) adjourned the case to Wednesday for the hearing of the plaintiffs’ motion on notice seeking an order restraining Saraki and other defendants from going ahead to constitute the standing committees of the Senate pending when their suit challenging the validity of the Senate Standing Orders 2015 is determined.

    Oke contended that court processes in the case were served on his office instead of being served personally served on his client, as prescribed the Federal High Court Rules 2009.

    Plaintiffs’ lawyer, Dele Adesina (SAN), in a counter argument, contended that there are obligatory provisions of the same court rules which envisages and validates service on Saraki through his office.

    Adesina also argued that Oke could not be heard since he had yet to file memorandum of appearance to appear for the first defendant (Saraki).

    Ruling, Justice Kolawole upheld Adesina’s position and disqualified Oke from appearing for Saraki during the proceedings.He directed that the case be transferred to another judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola, who will take over as the vacation judge of the Federal High Court in Abuja on August 10. He adjourned to August 13.

    Justice Kolawole had, in a ruling on July 28, dismissed an ex parte application by the plaintiffs in which they had earlier sought the restraining order against the constitution of the senate standing committees.

    In the ruling, Justice Kolawole said the disputes arising from the alleged forgery of the Senate Standing Orders constituted internal legislative affair of the Senate which the court would not want to intervene in.

  • Insecurity: Lawmakers summon security agencies

    The Benue State House of Assembly yesterday summoned heads of security agencies to explain the persistence of insecurity.

    Those to appear before the lawmakers include the police commissioner, director of State Security Services (SSS), commandant of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and the special adviser to the governor on security.

    The House took the decision, following a motion of Urgent Public Importance by the member representing Kwande East Constituency, Mr. James Gbande, who lamented that the constituents were attacked by suspected Fulani herdsmen.

    He said 17 primary schools, three UBE secondary schools, three local government clinics, one government science secondary school and a house were destroyed by suspected herdsmen.

    Gbande urged the government to deploy security personnel in the affected towns, such as Anyiase, Imande-Dura, Ikyoawen and Beebeshiu, to ensure Internally-Displaced Persons (IDPs) return to their homes.

    He said a mobile police post should be established at Anyiase, the headquarters of Moon Local Government, to restore peace.

    Other legislators including, Mr. Benjamin Nungwa (Kwande West); Mr. Terhemba Chabo (Gboko West); Mrs. Ngunan Addingi (Buruku); Mr. Ianna Jato (Katsina Ala East); Mr. Kettering Ikyange (Logo); Mr. Joseph Ojobo (Ogbadibo); Mr. Dominic Ucha (Vandeikya Tiev) and Mr. Richard Ujege, (Konshisha) described the motion as apt and timely, enjoining the Assembly to tackle insecurity.

    Speaker Terkimbi Ikyange directed the State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) to give relief materials to the victims.

    He said mobile clinics should be established for the IDPs and advised the state government to work with the Federal Government to establish a mobile police post at Anyiase, to prevent a recurrence.

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Lawmakers criticise workmanship at Zuma’s home

    A panel of South African lawmakers expressed concern about shoddy work during a 215 million rand ($17 million) security upgrade to President Jacob Zuma’s private home and said contractors may have overcharged the state.

    The Times published a picture of a goat inside one of the 21 thatched-roof houses built for Zuma’s security detail at his home outside Nkandla in KwaZulu-Natal province. Most dwellings and a clinic were empty, the Johannesburg-based newspaper said. Lawmakers and journalists visited the area on Wednesday.

    “We were astounded to find that most of the work was still incomplete,” Cedric Frolick, the committee’s chairman, said in an e-mailed statement. “It appears that costs to implement this project were inflated.”

    Zuma, 73, has faced a public backlash since graft ombudsman Thuli Madonsela said in a report in March last year that he unfairly benefited from the renovation of his home. The lawmakers’ panel was set up to consider a finding by Police Minister Nkosinathi Nhleko that Zuma wasn’t liable to repay any of the taxpayers’ money that was spent.

    “There is absolutely no sign of the money being used sensibly,” Corne Mulder, a committee member from the opposition, Freedom Front Plus, said in an e-mailed statement. “The public has good reason to be concerned about what transpired at Nkandla.”

    While Madonsela said the makeover had cost 215 million rand at the time of her  report and the price tag was expected to rise to 246 million rand by the time the work was completed, Frolick said 206 million rand had been spent.

    Zuma denied authorizing the renovations, which included a swimming pool, amphitheater and cattle and chicken enclosures.

    “Reports portraying security upgrades at President Jacob Zuma’s private residence as lavish and unnecessary” were an “exaggeration,” said Frolick, who’s a member of Zuma’s ruling African National Congress.