Tag: Lawmakers

  • Lawmakers urge Fed Govt to end attacks on their villages

    Members of the House of Representatives from Kaduna South yesterday urged the Federal Government to end the incessant attacks on their villages by unknown gunmen.

    The attacks, they said, have led to the death of several residents in the last one year.

    The affected villages are in the three local government areas of the Southern Senatorial District of Kaduna State.

    The lawmakers also appealed to Governor Mukthar Ramalan Yero to deploy more security personnel in the affected areas to restore peace and secure life and property.

    Gideon L. Gwani (Kaura Federal Constituency), Godfrey A. Gaiya (Jaba/Zango Kataf Constituency), Adams Jagaba Adams (Kachia/Kagarko Constituency), Simon Arabo (Kauru Federal Constituency) and Shehu N. Garba (Jema’a/Sanga Constituency) met yesterday in Kaduna to proffer solution to the attacks.

    In a statement at the end of the meeting, the lawmakers said they resolved “to condemn …the renewed attacks on Southern Kaduna villages, particularly the one that happened in Kaura and claimed more than 20 lives, with four villages burnt down by unknown assailants”.

    The statement added that the lawmakers met “to commiserate with the affected communities and call on all relevant government agencies to provide, urgently, relief materials to cushion the effects of the attacks on displaced persons, particularly women and children sheltered at various primary schools in Kaura Local Government Area”.

    The lawmakers appealed to “the entirety of Southern Kaduna Senatorial Zone to remain calm, orderly and peaceful, even in the face of the unnecessary attacks being visited on the people”.

    They urged the communities to be law-abiding but vigilant.

    The lawmakers also urged the Federal Government “to urgently end the incessant attacks on the people of the Southern Kaduna Senatorial Zone”.

     

  • Lawmakers to discuss constitutional powers

    Judiciary Committee members of the two chambers of the National Assembly will converge on Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, tomorrow to dilate on the constitutional powers of the legislature.

    The workshop, organised by the National Institute for Legislative Studies, will hold at Kwara Hotel, Ilorin. The opening session will be attended by Kwara State Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed and will be declared open by Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu.

    The Attorneys-General of the 36 states and Speakers of the Houses of Assembly are expected to attend the workshop. It will also discuss the challenges faced by the federal and state lawmakers in implementing their constitutional powers as well as legislature-executive relations.

    The Chairman, House Committee on Judiciary, Dr. Alli Ahmad, said: “The workshop is necessitated by the current general disregard for legislative deliberations and resolutions; a situation that is inimical to our march towards the attainment of good governance and democratic ethos.”

  • Mixed reactions trail lawmakers’ quest for immunity

    Many politicians yesterday condemned moves by the House of Representatives to pass a bill to guarantee lawmakers’ immunity from court action on their utterances during plenary.

    A Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chieftain, Chief Abiola Ogundokun, criticised the move.

    Ogundokun told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja that the universal convention was that the lawmakers were not liable for their utterances at plenary and at committee sittings.

    He said: “The rights and privileges of what you say in the house begins and ends there.”

    The National Chairman of Kowa Party, Malam Umar Mustapha, said that the bill had portrayed the law makers in a bad light.

    Mustapha said: “It is like seeking protection against criminality and if they do not have anything to hide, they have better things than passing a redundant bill.

    “The 2015 elections is round the corner, let them put in place laws that will enhance good governance, social and economic development and job creation, rather than immunity law.”

    The former National Chairman of the de-registered National Conscience Party (NCP), Dr. Yunusa Tanko, condemned the move by the lawmakers.

    He said the move was very insulting on the intelligence of all Nigerians.

    He said debating such bill did not make any sense as it had turned Nigerian lawmakers to laughing stocks.

    Tanko said the initiative was absurd and least expected from legislators.

    The National Publicity Secretary of CNPP, Mr Osita Okechukwu, said immunity of the parliament was a universal convention.

    He said the bill had created the impression that they don’t understand their work.

    “The bill is self-serving and a way to cover up their shortcomings and abuse their privileges as lawmakers,” he said.

    Okechukwu said even the governors that had protection under immunity clause were using it to the detriment of good governance.

     

  • Agbaso’s indictment not political, say lawmakers

    The Imo State House of Assembly yesterday said its indictment of the Deputy Governor, Sir Jude Agbaso, for allegedly receiving N458million kickback from a contractor was not politically-motivated.

    It said media reports that the probe was over the 2015 election was wrong.

    The House, in a statement by its Chairman, Committee on Information, Acho Ihim, said it was “mischievous, sacrilegious and cheap blackmail” for anybody or group to divert attention from the issues at stake.

    “For the avoidance of doubt, the travails of Sir Jude Agbaso have nothing to do with 2015 rivalry, ethnic and zonal politics or indeed whipping up undue sentiments.

    “The fact of the matter remains that the Report of the Special Committee indicted the deputy governor.

    “The Imo State House of Assembly will, therefore, not allow external forces to influence its constitutional duties. Imo must be better,” the statement said.

    The House said a State and Local Government Joint Monitoring Committee was established about six months ago to monitor the construction of roads in the three senatorial zones.

    The committee, led by Stan Dara, submitted its report last month.

    The report, the House said, indicted three construction companies.

    Following the indictment, the House said it set up another Special Adhoc Committee to find out why the companies allegedly failed or abandoned their projects.

    The companies were invited to the House to explain.

    The House said the Managing Director of one of the firms “confessed that they abandoned their site because Agbaso demanded and collected N458 million from him.”

    “The committee thereafter invited Agbaso, and from the interview, the House found enough evidence and collaboration,” the House said.

    Agbaso denied media reports that he resigned, saying the allegation was not only false but politically-motivated to malign his person.

    He said the contractor was introduced by Governor Rochas Okorocha.

    The deputy governor claimed that he was a victim of the political games being played by powerful forces over who becomes governor in 2015.

    He spoke to reporters in Owerri at the weekend amid speculations that he was denied access to his office and being pressured to resign as a face-saving measure.

    Agbaso denied the stories, saying he was on his desk on Friday.

    The deputy governor described the impeachment threat against him by the House of Assembly as ill-informed and unfair.

    Agbaso called on the relevant agencies to investigate the allegation.

    He said: “Let me put it straight and, very categorical too, that at no time, have I contemplated resigning as Imo State deputy governor.

    “As I stated earlier, the mandate was freely and massively given to me by the people of this state.

    “So, I never resigned, I never intend to resign and I will continue to serve the people, until the mandate they gave me elapses.

    “I want to also seize this opportunity to state that at no time did I demand N458million or any sum of money from any contractor in Imo State.

    “And at no time did the contractor, Joseph Dina of JPRO, pay me N458 million.

    “JPRO is the contractor working on the present day Sam Mbakwe road.

    “I never knew the construction company or its owners.

    “The company was introduced to the state by Governor Rochas Okorocha, who approved a contract of N1.5billion.

    “Since they said the money had been paid to the bank, I think the onus is to call on investigative agents to trace the payment; N458million is not N458, 000 and it cannot vanish into thin air.

    “They should look for the money there (in the account the contractor claimed he paid into). It must be there.

    “If it is not there, they can track the money. It can be traced to the last account that it went into.

    “With forensics, they can trace the money into the pockets of those who took it.

    “But my dear people of Imo State, I state here one more time, I never asked for the money, I never received the money and I do not have any thing to do with it.

    “The other question is why all these things about bribery and impeachment at this moment?

    “This whole thing stems from the various players’ agitation as to the situation in 2015.

    “I have heard speculations about who runs in 2015 and who does not.

    “I have heard that this has everything to do with it. But I can tell you it has nothing to do with the person of the deputy governor as we speak.

    “And I think that, sooner rather than later, this whole story would be unravelled.

    “Let me state that I have maintained a robust, cordial relationship with Governor Rochas Okorocha.”

     

  • Lawmakers slam Ladoja for comments

    Lawmakers slam Ladoja for comments

    Members of the Oyo State House of Assembly have criticised former Governor Rashidi Ladoja for his comments on the urban renewal programme of the Governor Abiola Ajimobi administration.

    In a national newspaper, Ladoja said the programme lacked a human face.

    At plenary yesterday, Mr. Yisau Adesope (Orelope) and Mr. Adesina Adeyemo described Ladoja’s statement as “ridiculous” and “inciteful”.

    Adesope said the Accord leader cannot compare the present administration with his because Ajimobi is not demolishing markets but illegal structures.

    He said: “The traders are trading in illegal places and the government has provided alternative trading areas for them. The governor should be praised by the opposition and not condemned. Ladoja should be a partner in progress and should not be seen as playing dirty politics.

    “I am surprised that Ladoja could make such an unguarded statement because he has close to three commissioners in this administration. He cannot be benefiting from us and condemning our government. It will be better for him to keep mute and be a partner in progress or withdraw his men from this administration.”

    Adeyemo said the demolition was not to witch-hunt anybody but to remove structures obstructing the water ways.

     

  • Ogun Assembly suspends four lawmakers

    Ogun Assembly suspends four lawmakers

    Four members of the Ogun State House of Assembly have been suspended, Speaker Suraj Adekunbi said yesterday.

    They are Remmy Hazzan, Motunrayo Adijat Oladapo-Adeleye, Job Akintan and John Obafemi.

    Adekunbi said nobody would be allowed to drag the Assembly into disrepute.

    He said: “Today at plenary, I said nobody should go in or out of the chamber without observing courtesy for the institution. We have to live by good example. Hassan, Adeleye, Akintan and Obafemi have been suspended and their suspension stands indefinitely.

    “The House will reconvene by the special grace of God tomorrow. It is an institution and it is greater than anybody. Their attitude, so far, has been uncharitable.

    “What they are talking about is money bill and nobody can bring it up without informing stakeholders and following due process. Everything would be debated.”

    Hazzan, Oladapo-Adeleye, Akintan and Obafemi were suspended for being unruly in protesting the appointment of a Tenders Board chairman.

    After plenary, the four and others in sympathy with them returned to the House to say they had suspended the Speaker. They had no mace.

    The Assembly began plenary a few minutes after 10am yesterday.

    Adekunbi called on Jolaoso to move a motion to facilitate the amendment of the bill on how the state could obtain loan/bond facilities. The Hazzan group kicked.

    A heated argument ensued among the lawmakers. There was chaos.

    The mace, which is the Assembly’s symbol of authority, was broken.

    Men of the Department of State Security Service (DSS), the Police and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) restored calm in the chamber.

    The Chief Whip, Mr. Segun Solarin and Mr. Kunle Oluomo (Ifo Constituency I) told reporters that the legislators were on a short recess and would reconvene later, adding that Hassan and his group could not suspend anybody.

    Solarin said: “We are on recess. We will go back to the House and reconvene to complete today’s plenary. That is the situation now.”

  • Suspension of four lawmakers in Ogun

    Suspension of four lawmakers in Ogun

    SIR: What distinguishes man from animals is the observance of law and order. Developed societies of today attained such status because of adherence to the rule of law. Any right-thinking person should therefore support any measure taken to enforce law and order in order to keep the society a going concern.

    Given the above background, the suspension of four members of the Ogun State House of Assembly by the House leadership should be commended. Three weeks ago on a radio programme, one of the suspended legislators threatened to precipitate a crisis in the legislative chamber. She collected a handful of three other lawbreakers and violated Rule 38 of the House at the penultimate sitting of the legislature.

    What is more, after they had been suspended at the plenary on Tuesday they decided to break the mace of the House in order to prevent further legislative business. They even went further to announce the suspension of the leadership of the House after destroying the mace. We must not condone this brazen display of lawlessness anywhere in the country.

    Of course, any discerning mind could see the hand of the discredited opposition in the attempted crisis. Having failed to create a state of insecurity in order to stall the ongoing development strides in the state, they have now shifted to the House in order to present a façade of crisis in Ogun. That won’t gel.

    I advise the House leadership, led by the Speaker, Suraj Ishola Adekunbi, to stick to the rules of the House. While we call on the police to investigate the criminality of the lawmakers with the aim of prosecution, they should be allowed to return to the chamber at the end of the maximum number of days prescribed by the House Rule. That way, we will all be seen to be promoting the rule of law in Nigeria.

    • Steven Oladele,

    Abeokuta.

  • Rivers lawmakers back Amaechi

    The Rivers State Caucus in the House of Representatives has pledged its solidarity and support for Governor Rotimi Amaechi.

    Its leader, Asita O. Asita, the lawmaker representing Ahoada-West and Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Federal Constituency, spoke yesterday during a visit to the Government House, Port Harcourt.

    Other members of the delegation include: Sokonte Davies (Bonny/Degema); Betty Apiafi (Abua/Ahoada-East); Andrew Uchendu (Ikwerre/Emohua);; Hon. Dakuku Peterside (Andoni/Opobo-Nkoro); Ogbonna Nwuke (Etche/Omuma); Pronem Morris (Khana/Gokana); Blessing Nsiegbe (Port Harcourt II); Ken Chikere (Port Harcourt I); Gogo Bright (Okrika/Ogu-Bolo); Dawari George (Akuku-Toru/Asari-Toru) and Barry Mpigi (Eleme/Tai/Oyigbo).

    The caucus congratulated Amaechi for his courage in giving the state its face-lift and speedy development.

    “We are here to declare our support and appreciation to you on how you have successfully managed the affairs of the state.

    “In the past five years and four months, we are satisfied with the level of implementation and vision that you have shown.

    “We are indeed thankful to God for giving you to our state at such a time as this.

    “We wish to congratulate you for the show of uncommon courage and statesmanship in the face of uncovered hostilities towards your person,” Asita said.

     

  • Lawmaker’s driver still held

    The driver of an Edo State lawmaker, Victor Igbinovia, who was abducted on February 3, is yet to be released.

    The driver was abducted with his boss, Victor Edoror, at Irrua, Esan Central Local Government.

    Edoror was released last Saturday at a village near Abraka in Delta State.

    The lawmaker said eight men abducted, blindfolded and tied him up for 14 days.

    He said he was fed eba without meat.

    “I think they were tired and they just left me to go,” he said.

    The Speaker, Uyi Igbe, during plenary yesterday, urged security agencies to work towards securing Igbinovia’s release.

    Edoror thanked the lawmakers for their support.

  • Why lawmakers are weak in oversight functions – Ibrahim

    Why lawmakers are weak in oversight functions – Ibrahim

    Senator Abu Ibrahim is the senator representing Katsina South Senatorial District on the platform of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC). A close associate of former head of state and presidential candidate of CPC in the April 2011 presidential election, Major General Mohammadu Buhari, he was the links man in the aborted merger plan between the CPC and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) ahead of the 2011 elections. He spoke with Tony Akowe on a number of issues. Excerpts

    2015 is around the corner and there is the clamour for a northern presidency. What is your take on this?

    I think 2015 is not around the corner because we have only spent one and half years in four year tenure; with two and half years to go. What is in front of me now is to have the opposition parties merge into one; ACN, CPC and probably ANPP, to form a formidable opposition party. One thing Nigerians do not know is that the moment we succeed in the merger plan, even the PDP must step up because they know there is somebody who can take over from them. But because most parties are not united and have strength in certain areas, that is why they do things with arrogance because they know there is no single party that can take over from them. But the moment we come together, even though we are taking over power, they too will stand up and make sure they do the right thing. Of course, every region has the right to clamour for the presidency. But I always think the right moment will bring the right president which will be acceptable by the people, maybe a northern person or anybody from any part of the country. But when you look at the way we are passing power from zone to zone, it should be the right time for the north to have the president. But it is not a constitutional issue. It was a suitable arrangement by the political parties. But like I said, my main concern now is the merger of the political parties.

    Before the last general elections, there was a move by opposition parties to form an alliance but it collapsed. How sure are we that there won’t be a repeat of that scenario?

    You are wrong. I can claim, without contradiction, that I was the principal link between ACN and CPC. I can claim that I was the principal connector between Senator Ahmed Bola Tinubu and General Muhammadu Buhari and I know what transpired. It is the correct story I am telling you. There was no problem then except for lack of time. The issue became very serious six months to election. So as far as I am concerned, what was against us then was time. A name was agreed upon at that time for the two parties. The name agreed upon was Action Congress for Progressive Change (ACPC). It was also agreed that General Buhari will be the presidential candidate while ACN was to produce the Vice- President. But due to lack of time, we couldn’t do that. Every party then has done its conventions and had their candidates. There was no way we could go and start another convention. At least, we have basic understandings and CPC have a basic understanding on the parameter of merger. Then Buhari was agreed to be the presidential candidate and so, I don’t think there was a problem on that. But the timing was just too short because of the election. But we all knew that there were external forces that wanted to bring a setback.

    What do we expect from the National Assembly with regards to the Petroleum Industry Bill?

    What we agreed regarding the PIB was that we need technical briefing on it before considering the bill. But till now, the minister has not come to give us the briefing. Before we make a law, we need to ask a lot of questions. There are issues that need to be discussed technically and if we don’t understand the technicalities, we may pass something we don’t know anything about. After the minister and experts have briefed us, then we will understand the reasons behind the 10 percent to be given to the oil communities. It sounds nice, but how did you arrive at the 10 percent? How much is the investor making before you start talking about the 10 percent profit. So, we are still waiting for the Minister’s briefing.

    Many Nigerians believe that legislators are not performing their oversight functions well and that their laxity in doing so is responsible for the decay in most sectors of the economy. What is your reaction to this?

    I agree with you and that is the truth. But Nigerians should understand that the legislature is the weakest part of government and this is occasioned by the fact that during military interventions, when army take over, the presidency and the judiciary still exist while the National Assembly is closed down. In some countries, you will find out that some Senators have been there for over 30 years and such a senator knows virtually everything and have everything at his fingertips. Only 25 percent of members of the current Nigerian Senate are third termers and what this means is that a lot of members have a lot to learn. That makes the National Assembly the weakest in terms of capacity building, infrastructures, training and lots more. So, I agree that we are weak in that area. But we have been discussing these issues on how we can enhance our oversight functions and Nigerians must know that all these things cost money. People should not shout or cry that large sums of money are going to National Assembly. There is a complete budget office where budget is being prepared by the executive. They will study it item by item and can cost it for you and say look this project cost is high. So our oversight functions may be weak, but we are conscious of that because I am a member of the leadership. Honestly, every time we meet, we lament over our weaknesses. Like the issue of the state of our police colleges, I am a member of the Police Affairs Committee. Since I found myself in the Assembly, I have not gone to any police college. It is only now that we are preparing to visit the police colleges to see things for ourselves. We are even thinking of visiting zonal commands and places like that.

    Some people believe that lawmakers don’t actually carry out oversight function when they go out, but they go there to collect money from the agencies?

    I cannot accept that because I have been to many places and nothing of such happened. I think the issue is beyond giving or receiving brown envelopes; it is the issue of capability. If you look at the number of staff an American Senator has and you look at what we have here, you will laugh. A Senator in America has over 70 staff, while I have just five staff. Every committee should have operational vehicles, but our committee has only one. So, if we want to visit for example Police College and our members are ten in the committee with only one vehicle, the car will not be able to take us all and we will end up looking for assistance from the ministry for a bus which could compromise the process. So, all I am trying to say is that we need to do our oversight functions well, but the National Assembly is not founded properly to have the capacity to do the job well.

    Every year, a lot is said about constituency projects for members of the National Assembly and people have always come up with this idea that money budgeted are diverted to personal use by members. How much was actually budgeted for constituency projects last year?

    There was negotiation between the federal government and the National Assembly on that and at the end of the day, I think about a hundred billion will be provided for constituency projects. However, let us not misunderstand constituency projects as if the money is given to members of the National Assembly. Each Senator is allocated some of the money and you decide which of the projects is more important to your area. You will go then and put it under the ministry concerned. The ministry will receive the money and execute the projects.

    This was how this issue of constituency projects came in and nobody is given a Kobo out of the money. What is important is to make it clear that money is not taken from federal treasury and given to me for example to go and implement projects in the name of constituency projects.

    Don’t you think that getting involved in project execution and monitoring is taking you away from your legislative duties?

    Approval of the budget is one of our primary functions and the budget covers project. If we approve, why can’t we have the right to say my constituency should have this and that? I am more of a representative than a minister because I am elected. I am supposed to have a constituency office. I am supposed to be with my people always to know their needs and report back and make sure their needs are attended to.

    It is easier for people of my constituency to come and see me than to see the Minister even though the budget is prepared by the Ministers. So, approval, which is the Appropriation Bill, is the function of the National Assembly. The President prepares it and brings it to the National Assembly who appropriates. That is why this issue of project is not taking our time. An oversight function again is to make sure that the projects that are contained in the budget are carried out. When you look at the constitution, you will see that it is part of our primary function. In fact, it’s our biggest function to make sure that the budgets are implemented. That is why we have committees for each sector. For instance education is attached to education ministry. They can go to the minister at any time to say look, we appropriated a hundred million to build a schools in so and so places; we want to go and see the place. Appropriation and monitoring of oversight function is the most powerful tool in the National Assembly and they can indict the government if they so wish. They can go and see project and with that we can expose corruption.

    What do you think should be done to tackle insecurity in Nigeria, particularly in the north?

    I was watching Al jazeera recently and I saw the president of Somalia saying there was this link between Alshabab and Boko Haram, which means that these things are now having a global network. So, I think the Federal government has to act fast in terms of diplomatic relations with those countries that they think Al’shabab and Alqa’ida have roots. This fight in Mali is so important to Nigeria because definitely the alqa’ida Almagrib have link here. It may have started as a local issue, but international terrorist groups are looking for local groups so as to start coming in. The federal government has to step up and cooperate with other nations for a lasting solution for this insecurity issue.

    Coming back to your state, Katsina, what is your take on the activities of the PDP-controlled government in the state? How will you rate the performance?

    I am disappointed with the attitude of the Katsina State Government. There were two issues of concern to me. There are power projects, transmission lines which were awarded by late Yar’adua and funded for two years. One of the projects was in Katsina South and three are in Katsina North. Suddenly,

    in last year’s budget, they were removed and these were projects that were signed and construction was going on; but they were removed from the budget. Along with my colleagues, we were fighting to ensure that they were restored in the budget. I tried to get Katsina State government involved but somehow they were not forthcoming.

    Another issue is that of water. We have Jibiya dam and the Safka dam which will involve foreign loan and because of our involvement in the approval process, we said Katsina has been omitted. But we have no right to sign loan on behalf of Katsina and so it requires the governor to come but he didn’t come. Honestly, Katsina state government have failed completely in addressing the suffering of Katsina people, especially in the area of water and electricity when they can come and use their position as PDP government to do so.

    We members of the opposition got some listening ear and all that was required was for them to come and participate in the fight; but they didn’t come. I cannot say right now whether the issue of Power has been restored in the budget. So, I cannot give the Katsina State government pass mark. They claimed to have built 600 tube wells in the 34 local government areas of Katsina State while we have built 1100 of such wells in Funtua zone with eleven local government areas. Some of the roads we are doing belong to Katsina state government. I don’t know what they are doing, but I can see buildings with no relevance being built. Class rooms without teachers; you can see buildings but no teachers.

    I am bringing ICT schools, but we need security. We are going to put computers in the class rooms but we need security. If the schools are not capable of securing them, we will try to involve the state government. I will take the project there and let them secure them. I may be in this position maybe for four years but if a state government or local government is involved, there will be a permanent security so that it will last longer. I am sorry to say that Katsina State government is not doing what it is expected to do.