Tag: leaders’

  • Ikwerre leaders, IYM threaten N2b suit against anti-Amaechi campaigners

    The leaders of four Ikwerre-speaking local government areas of Rivers State and their youths’ movement (IYM) have threatened to file a N2 billion libel suit against a group, Integrity Group Organisation (IGO), for allegedly publishing defamatory statement against former Governor Rotimi Amaechi.

    IGO, a non-governmental organisation (NGO), published on August 3 an advertorial that the former governor allegedly embezzled billions of Naira belonging to Rivers State.

    The group is said to be supporting Governor Nyesom Wike to fight his opponents.

    The four Ikwerre-speaking local government areas are: Obio/Akpor, Emohua, Ikwerre and Port Harcourt City.

    They share the same cultural identity.

    Reacting yesterday in Port Harcourt, the state capital, to the advertorial, leaders of the four local government areas and IYM said they had asked the NGO to produce the evidence on the allege fraud within seven days.

    On behalf of the four local government areas, Emohua Local Government Area’s Chairman Lucky Worluh said the Ikwerre would file a libel suit against the NGO to prove Amaechi’s innocence.

    The spokesman said the action would be taken against the NGO and its sponsors, if it failed to back the libellous publication against Amaechi with a genuine document before the expiration of the ultimatum.

    He said leaders and elders of the four local government areas and the leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) supported the legal action to defend the former governor, who brought honour and development to Ikwerre land.

    Worluh said: “We do not only condemn the unholy allegations against Amaechi but we also challenge the leader of the unregistered NGO, Mr.  Livingstone Nwejie, his paymaster and sponsors to make public all relevant documents relating to the allegation within seven days of this publication.”

    The spokesman noted that Rivers State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its leaders were only interested in how to bring Amaechi down.

    According to him, with his (Amaechi’s) rising profile across Nigeria, especially for leading an armless revolution that ousted former President Goodluck Jonathan and heading the campaign that brought in the Muhammadu Buhari administration to power, it should be expected that the PDP would mount more smear campaigns against Amaechi.

    IYM’s National President Azubuike Wanjoku said the Ikwerre ethnic nationality would not allow what it called a dubious publication to insult and blackmail the former governor.

    He said: “We wish to state categorically that the Ikwerre ethnic nationality, Rivers State and Niger Deltans are indebted to Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi to have offered his life to lead a common sense revolution against the Jonathan administration…”

  • The artful forgers

    If things had gone well, the process should not have generated acrimony. But long before the June 9 inauguration of the Senate, its members were already divided. The division was and still is over the filling of its top  positions, especially the Senate presidency. As the majority party, which is expected, to produce the presiding officers, the All Progressives Congress (APC) settled for Senators Ahmed Lawan and George Akume as Senate president and deputy Senate president (DSP).

    The party’s choice did not go down well with a group of senators rooting for Senator Bukola Saraki. The battle line was thus drawn between the Like Minds comprising Saraki’s loyalists and the Unity Forum, to which Lawan and Akume belong. It became a game of wheeler dealing and the sort ahead of the June 9 inauguration. On the inauguration day, the Unity Forum members were not in the Senate chamber, making it easy for Saraki to emerge Senate president unopposed with the support of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) whose senators were there in full force. PDP through Senator Ike Ekweremadu got the DSP to the bargain.

    Since then, the Senate has not known peace. The Lawan group has refused to recognise Saraki’s leadership, insisting that  he came to office through a ‘’forged Senate Rules’’, which stipulate how the Senate president should be elected. The Saraki group counters that the Rules were not forged. According to the Like Minds, the Rules were amended by the last Senate before it wound up last June 4. The question that arises from the group’s submission is : can outgoing senators set rules for incoming senators, many of who will be coming to the Senate for the first time?

    Assuming that all the old senators will be returning to the Senate does it make sense for them to set rules for a Senate, which life had not yet begun? The matter eventually landed in court. Rather than address the matter, the court resolved to play the ostrich by burying its head in the sand. The court said it could not look into the matter because it is an internal affair of the Senate, which could be addressed by its Ethic and Privileges Committee.

    It is not debatable that the Senate is an arm of government which has its own regulations. But under the doctrine of  Separation of Power, the judiciary can look into whatever the executive and legislature do to ensure that it is within the purview of the law.  The judiciary cannot shirk this responsibility under the guise that it would amount to ‘’undue interference” in either the executive’s or legislature’s ‘’internal affairs’’. What the court cannot do, in my lay man understanding, is to undo what has been properly done by these institutions. But where they appear to have done  wrong, it is the judiciary’s duty to whip them back  into line.

    Not to do so will amount to condoning illegality and enthroning lawlessness. If the court cannot look into an allegation of forgery because it happened on the floor of the Senate isn’t that saying any offence can be committed there and the suspect will go scot free because he is a lawmaker? As powerful as the Senate is, it cannot try criminal cases; only the courts can. The question then arises, is forgery a crime?

    According to the ninth edition of Black’s Law Dictionary, forgery is a crime. It states : In essence, the crime of forgery involves the making, altering, or completing of an instrument by someone other than the ostensible maker or drawer or an agent of the ostensible maker or drawer. It added: Though forgery was a misdemeanour at common law, modern statutes typically make it a felony.

    Thus, the courts cannot and should not close their eyes to certain developments in the legislature under the pretence of non-interference. If they do, they will be paving the way for our lawmakers to get away with anything, including murder.  What did the court make of the police report that the Senate Rules were forged? Nothing, it dismissed offhand the  report, which should have aided it in reaching a considered decision on the matter.

    The court missed the opportunity to pronounce on the matter judiciously and judicially when it threw away the baby with the bath water. But the police are not keeping quiet; they are fighting back. In a preliminary objection to a case filed by Senator Gilbert Nnaji, they are insisting on their right to investigate the forgery allegation and bring the perpetrators to justice. The police, in a counter affidavit, notes that the forgery allegation borders on ‘’issue of criminality, and not simply an issue on the floor of the Senate”. Investigating the allegation, the police claim, cannot be undue interference in the Senate’s affair. To the police, every Nigerian can be investigated for crime. How true and one only hopes that the police will live up to this averment always.

    The police made valid claims in their deposition. This case is of public interest because it involves the second arm of government, which is charged with making laws for the country. But when lawmakers become lawbreakers,  the law should be applied against them like any other person caught in a compromised position.

    Since senators occupy an exalted position, they should not do anything unbecoming of their office, which could bring them to public ridicule. But if they do, they should be ready to pay the price. The law, they say, is no respecter of persons. So. these artful forgers should be brought to book.

     Their leaders’ sins

    On Monday, the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) released the May/June 2015 West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) results. Those who passed have been rejoicing, but not so those with poor results. But what do you say of those whose fate is hanging in the balance?  They do not know whether they passed or failed because their results were not released. Their results were withheld for no fault of theirs. They were not involved in examination malpractice; no they were not.  Their results were withheld because their states are owing WAEC.

    To avoid this kind of embarrassment, WAEC warned before it released the results that it would withhold those of candidates from the 13 debtor-states if the debts were not defrayed. The states probably thought that WAEC was joking as they pretended not to hear the warning,  even after they had been written to pay up. Must these pupils be made to suffer for the sins of their leaders whose children may not be schooling in the country. How much is the WAEC fee compared to the millions of dollars they pay on their own children abroad? It will be unfortunate if these pupils miss entering the university this year because of this problem. If these pupils were their children, will they abandon them like this? May God touch the hearts of the chief executives of these debtor-states to do what is necessary and needful before it is too late.

  • Igbotako students get leaders

    Igbotako students get leaders

    The Federation of Igbotako Students Union (FISU) of Okitipupa Local Government Area of Ondo State has inaugurated the executive that will steer the affairs of the body for one year.

    The event, which held at Big Soul Hotel and Garden in Okitipupa, was attended by members, community leaders and the union’s patrons.

    A student of Adekunle Ajasin University in Akungba-Akoko (AAUA), Yomi Ayeleso, was sworn as national president.

    In his valedictory speech, the immediate past president, Adebayo Jimoh, hailed the outgoing members of executive for their commitments to the goals of the union. He said his tenure witnessed landmark achievements, urging his successor to sustain the feat.

    Yomi thanked members of the union for electing him, promising never to disappoint them.

    The 300-Level Business Administration student praised his predecessor for his efforts to build the union and make it a force to reckon with in Ikale land.

    To achieve his aims, Yomi said his administration would partner with persons and bodies within and outside the community. He said: “Our administration will work and engage in mutual relationship with any committed persons and bodies within and outside the community to achieve our objectives. As core mandates of the union, we will engage the appropriate authorities for improved welfare package of students.”

    While soliciting support of students for his administration, he urged all indigenes of the council to assist the union to complete the public library started by his predecessor.

    Other members of the executive include Aanu Olowokanga, Vice President, Olawale Fayemiro, General Secretary, Bosede Akinbinu, Assistant General Secretary, Segun Ogunmakin, Financial Secretary, and Bayo Adeyekun, Social Director.

    Others are Taiwo Akinraye, Public Relations Officer, Abdurazak Jimoh, Treasurer, Sunday Olanusi, Special Duties and Innocent Okpako, Sports Director.

  • Cleric advises leaders

    A cleric, Alhaji Abdulsalam Imam, yesterday urged Nigerian leaders to be dedicated and honest when called upon to serve in any capacity.

    lmam spoke in Ilorin while delivering a sermon at a reception to mark the 80th birthday of a National Commissioner of lNEC, Dr Abdulkadir Oniyangi.

    He noted that public office should a public trust which should be used to serve humanity and not to amass wealth.

    The cleric commended Oniyangi for representing Kwara well in all offices he had served.

    Abdulkadir also admonished all aspiring leaders to shun materialism and corruption that had destroyed the economic prosperity of Nigeria.

    The Chairman of the event, Prof. Ibrahim Gambari, former Nigeria’s Permanent Representative at the United Nations, described Oniyangi as an outstanding public administrator.

    He urged Nigerians to emulate Oniyangi’s patriotism and selfless zeal.

     

  • Young business leaders target 1.2m jobs

    Young business leaders have vowed to generate millions of jobs for the unemployed before the end of next year.

    They made the pledge when they gathered yesterday for the launch of Young Business Leaders of Nigeria (YBLN) – a network of young professionals aimed at assisting budding entrepreneurs to hone and develop their business acumen.

    The focus of discussion at the forum at Muson Centre in Onike, Lagos, was centred on how potential and innovative minds of young people could be harnessed to generate the promised jobs and ease the nation’s employment burden.

    Ms Temitayo Etomi, YBLN founder, said the initiative was aimed at creating platform for entrepreneurs to rally resources together for the financing of practicable business ideas.

    They ideas, she said, would generate decent employment for the youth before the end of December 2016.

    Temitayo, who is a 2014 Mandela Washington Fellow, said several feasible strategies had been mapped out to create opportunities for unemployed and under-employed people, who are willing to change their conditions.

    To achieve the aim, she said the group would engage unemployed youths in batches of mentorship programmes that would run for eight weeks, after which the trainees would be given soft loans to start businesses in their preferred areas of interest.

    If continued, Temitayo, who is the group managing partner of Redwire Marketing Group, said the group, by the end of 2016, would have achieved its projection to engage more than one million jobless youths in lucrative ventures that would have positive impact on the economy, adding that the group would also train unskilled people to create employability values for their self-sustenance.

    She said: “The YBLN has objectives to bring about new idea that will help solve unemployment crisis. It is basically exploring the effort and ideas of a minority in business to help confront the challenges of the majority who don’t have job. We are creating a network of young professionals and business leaders to create platform for solving unemployment crisis we are facing.”

    She said the initiative would be funded from regular contributions by successful businessmen, adding that the money would be used to train jobless youths in employability skills and finance entrepreneurship ideas that are found business-worthy.

    Noting that the rising unemployment was taking its toll on the country, Temitayo said two of every three youths are either unemployed or under-employed. She said government alone could not be responsible for provision of lucrative jobs, saying it was time for young people to think about how they could use their potential to create opportunities for themselves.

    The event featured a discussion on unemployment, which had top business managers, including Mr George Etomi, Managing Partner of Etomi and Partners, Ms Doyin Odunfa, Chief Executive Officer of Digital Jewel and Mr. Uyi Akpata, Country Partner, PricewatersCoopers, as discussants. The Editor of Sunday Punch, Ms Toyosi Ogunseye, moderated the session.

  • What drives successful leaders?

    When the results of the last elections were announced and now President Muhammadu Buhari was declared the winner, I got a call from my mother. Immediately I picked her call she said “Finally, your man has won.” Unlike my mother, she didn’t – or momentarily forgot – to ask how my family is doing. As a long time Buhari advocate and fan who has been trying to sell his candidacy to my extended family since 2003, she felt I deserved commendation and congratulation for remaining steadfast against all odds. During our conversation I could sense the confusion on how Buhari won in her voice. I will explain what I mean.

    My home state, Benue – like some north central states – has been experiencing a recurring farmer/herdsmen clash over the years. The overwhelming local conclusion is that these attacks are being sponsored by some elusive individuals. The big question on the lips of indigenes is ‘who are these herdsmen and why has none been caught and prosecuted?’ Since that has not happened, the undercurrent is that it has to be the ‘Hausas.’ This was why it was widely perceived that a Buhari candidacy “cannot fly” in the state.

    To be very frank, I initially shared the opinion that it might be difficult to sell Buhari in the state because our people are very emotional and their distrust of anything ‘Hausa’ runs deep. It goes back to almost all the religious crises in the north where many citizens of the state paid the supreme prize. Emotions often run high whenever the coffins start arriving after each crisis. The new regime thus has its work cut out for it as the people expect radical change in this area.

    But change comes at a prize which is why I refuse to join the bandwagon of those castigating the president for being ‘slow.’ The enormous challenges we face today as a nation requires deep reflection and introspection. I was glad to hear the president say in Washington last Monday that the delay in the appointment of ministers is to allow for critical reforms which will guide their conduct. For me, there’s no need hurrying to nowhere.

    So what drives successful leaders? Leadership is an essential feature of all government and governance. Weak leadership contributes to government failures, and strong leadership is indispensable if the government is to succeed. Wise leadership secures prosperity in the long run; foolhardy leadership may bring about a catastrophe.

    Leadership is a historically concrete phenomenon; that is, its structures and methods change with the passage of time. To influence events and affect outcomes, leaders need to be prepared to abandon policy instruments and ideas that no longer work in a new environment. They need to be able to embrace the new and reevaluate the old, even some of the earlier discarded ideas and methods of adapting to environments, if the circumstances call for it.

    I strongly believe that a successful leader chooses a particular course of action and then in some way gets others to go along; or more subtly, the leader encourages the led to ‘choose’ the course that the group will follow. The co-determination of the two parts of the leadership–followership system means that leaders are, to a significant extent, created by the led just like we saw with the overwhelming endorsement of a Buhari presidency. In the complex leadership quotient, followers matter a great deal; indeed leadership, as a process, is greatly influenced by following.

    Successful leaders are also driven by the introduction of new ideas or novel orientations which often promote major changes in societies. By advancing vision, inspiration, conceptualization of change, articulation of ideological goals and their communication to followers they are able to take their societies to greater heights.

    In Nigeria, whenever the word “leadership” is mentioned people conjure a mental image of those few individuals who steer the nation at the helms of power as politicians, bureaucrats, religious leaders and business moguls. This is vertical construction of leadership which is a top-down affair where the fulcrum of power is concentrated at the top of the social, economic, and political hierarchy.

    One of the defects of this model is the stifling of grassroots initiatives necessary for social cohesion. Another is that it does not consider how individuals, in collectivist contexts, can exercise leadership that will address problems, create solutions, and benefit the common whole. We need a radical departure from this style.

    Successful horizontal leadership, on the other hand, lays emphasis on individuals being empowered to benefit the larger community and ensure basic human rights by responding to the dictates of the situation. It recognises the value of individuals beyond mere instruments but instead empowers them in understanding policies and the part they have to play.

    This model requires that citizens take responsibility for improving society and at the very least participate in local, state, and national governance. This type of individually empowered leadership fuels the full-spectrum of social change that Nigeria needs, from the base of the pyramid to the apex.

    Indeed, horizontal leadership is the cultural heritage of Nigeria, embedded in our traditional narratives, myths and civil religion. We have since jettisoned this type of indigenous leadership model but we need to revisit it as a viable vehicle for making institutions accountable to Nigerians and Nigerians accountable to each other.

    For the successful leader too education is critical. Without access to education and literacy, the next generation of Nigeria’s leaders would be crippled. Few would doubt that there is a crisis in our education sector. Because our educational system has not kept up with the practical demands of the age, Nigerian graduates are not taught the necessary skills to favourably compete in the marketplace.

    Our system produce graduates who can regurgitate information, but not those who can innovate, create, and lead according to the demands of changing times. With this mindset it is not surprising that our schools keep producing job seekers, but we need to produce job creators. Our system must equip students to innovate for the betterment of society. To accomplish this redefinition of the goal of education and reorientation towards viable skills, we need to transform our curriculum.

    In developed societies, students are not only engaged in traditional education, they are tasked with solving real-life problems, working in groups to innovate, and provided platforms to implement change. If our education cannot help us live better, we need to change our understanding of what education ought to accomplish. When students are untrained in skills that matter, how can we expect Nigeria’s factories, hospitals and businesses to operate well and employ Nigeria’s people?

    The new leadership is thus challenged to redefine the objective our education which should inculcate both formal and informal forms of learning to incorporate more dimensions to convey knowledge that meets 21st century needs. This may take time to evolve, but if we start implementing it in piecemeal, it may end up producing well-rounded graduates who would in turn fulfill the missions of education.

    Leadership therefore plays a crucial role in the development of any society, a look at the leadership structure of a society says a whole lot about that society, which is why John Maxwell – who has written and researched extensively on the subject – said everything rises and falls on leadership. Leadership can either move a people forward or backward, it can cause incalculable damage that in some cases may require decades to correct. As a student of history and political economy, I’ve taken the pains to study the critical path of nations, and in my studies and research, I’ve discovered that leadership plays a fundamental role.

    Most countries in the advanced world have a laid down blueprint and guideline for leadership grooming and selection – even though no one is going to print out a manual and give to you, nonetheless such things exists -that is why they never have issues in this critical area of progress.

    Nigeria’s, and by extension Africa’s leadership crisis is deeply engrained and multifaceted; it is a combination of lack of vision, greed, tribal, religious and sectional affinity and most importantly, the unwillingness to leave the stage when the ovation is loudest. But we have broken the jinx with the election of president Buhari. All we need now is to patiently wait for him to turn things around or lay the foundation for the change we all agree we need.

  • Africa’s leaders and term limits

    On April 30, on a street of Musaga, an outskirt of Bujumbura, two men held up a pair of placards reading: “Peace we need” and “We say no to the 3rd term”. The duo were among the tens of thousands Burundians, who poured to the street in a perennial protest asking President Pierre Nkurunziza to jettison his controversial third term bid for good.

    In neighbouring Rwanda, President Paul Kagame, has made no secret of similar bid. The body language of president of Benin and that of his counterpart in Democratic Republic of Congo reveals the same intention to remain in power despite attaining their constitutional term limit. In Zimbabwe, the continent’s oldest head of state, Robert Mugabe, is enjoying limitless tenure since the nation achieved independence in 1980. In the same vein, the Gambia’s long-serving President Yahya Jammeh, is not looking forward to extend his tenure for a handful of years or so. He told the BBC in 2011, that he would rule for “one billion years… if Allah says so”.

    These and many more African leaders, who are unwilling to relinquish power, have been on a collision course with ordinary Africans’ strong support of presidential term limits.

    David Shinn, the former United States Ambassador to Burkina Faso and Ethiopia was said to have referred term limits for a country’s most important political leader as an essential component of building democracy.  He advocated for a gold standard of maximum of two terms, each of which does not exceed five years (seven years at most). Term limits, he explained, “are usually thought to apply to the office of president. But for countries like Ethiopia, where the prime minister holds most of the power, it is more important that the constitution designates term limits for that position, not the office of the president which is ceremonial.”

    Perhaps term limits can be a major hindrance to policy sustainability and sometime frustrate institution, especially for incumbent leaders but even occasionally for the led. As a result of these, some have expressed preference for leadership continuity rather than rotation because of the stability that comes with the former. Besides, many heads of government, Africans or otherwise, can serve their people effectively in a third or even fourth term. For instance, the first Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, who governed for more than three decades – from 1959 to 1990. Yet he oversaw the transformation of Singapore from a third world country into one of the world’s richest and most civilized nations, and into a new type of political entity.

    However, we have a host of other cases where prolonged stay in power leads to “syndrome of power in perpetuity” especially in Africa and the Middle East. A potent viewpoint on persistent leaders holds that they can be a biggest roadblock to transformation and fresh ideas. Multiple terms in office provides breeding ground for corruption, nepotism, tyranny, impunity and so on.

    But across Africa, the number of sit-tight leaders has been soaring over the years following the full-on metamorphosis of heads of government from transient leaders to presidents for life. In this context the old cliché, that children of today are the leaders of tomorrow has lost its currency, as far as democratic power transition from one generation to the next is concerned.

    Despite the paucity of smooth power transition across the continent, some African leaders have willingly turned over power in compliance with constitutional provisions. They include: former leaders of Botswana, Benin, Cape Verde, Mali, Mozambique, São Tomé and Príncipe and Tanzania. A truly extraordinary late Nelson Mandela had earned a peerless reputation for stepping down after his one term in office. But Jerry Rawlings of Ghana and Daniel arap Moi of Kenya complied with constitutional term limits under duress.

    Several African leaders tried in vain to change the term limit provision of their constitution so that they could run again. Zambia’s Frederick Chiluba, Malawi’s Bakili Muluzi and our own Olusegun Obasanjo ultimately bowed to the will of the political system and accepted term limits.

    Unfortunately, an attempt by West African leaders in May this year to adopt a common ground in favour of a maximum of two terms for all presidents in the region failed following disputations from the presidents of Togo (which abolished term limits in 2002) and Gambia.

    Based on an extensive and highly revered report published by AFRO Barometer recently, the following key findings were revealed. In 34 African countries, about three-quarters of citizens favour limiting presidential mandates to two terms. Support of term limits has been consistently high over time and is the majority view even in countries that have never had term limits or that have removed term limits from their constitutions. More-educated citizens tend to express greater support for term limits, as do citizens with greater exposure to the news media.

    It is obvious that Africans generally see the merit in term limits. Thus, it is time for more African governments to add term limits in the constitution and for incumbent leaders like President Nkurunziza it’s time to abide by the existing ones.

     

    • Rayyan wrote from Abuja
  • Nigerian Mathematical Society elects leaders

    The Nigerian Mathematical Society (NMS) has elected Prof Ninuola Akinwande of the Federal University of Technology, Minna as its new President and head of Council to run the affairs of the society for the next two years.

    Akinwande, who was the immediate past Secretary of the Society, was elected along with nine others, at the 34th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Society at University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos.

    Other members of the Council are Dr Bashir Ali (Vice President); Prof. G. C. E. Mbah (Secretary); Dr Sirajo Abdulrahman, also of FUT, Minna (Assistant Secretary); while Dr. E. E. David of University of Port Harcourt returned as Treasurer.

    Also elected were: Prof. S. S. Okoya of University of Lagos (Editor-in-Chief), Prof. O. Adeniran (Business Manager); and Prof Remi Odekunle and Prof J. E. Oguntuase (ex-offio).

    The immediate Past President, Prof. M. O. Osilike of University of Nigeria, Nsukka also made the council.

  • Osun students inaugurate leaders

    Osun students inaugurate leaders

    The University of Ilorin (UNILORIN) chapter of the National Association of Osun State Students (NAOSS) has sworn in new leaders after its election at the Faculty of Law.

    The election was conducted by a five-man electoral committee led by Abdulrahman Ishola. After the keenly contested election, Abideen Olasupo was announced president.

    Members saw the emergence of Abideen, a Google Ambassador, as good omen for the association, given the new president’s background in Information and Communication Technology (ICT).

    After he took the oath, Abideen said the association would waste no time in carrying out its projects, promising to organise entrepreneurship summit, Freshers’ Oratory Contest and improve online presence association, among others.

    He said: “I am ready to reform the association, using innovation as compass to achieve the aim. NAOSS cannot be left behind in the 21st century when the efficacy of globalisation can be felt by all. I will encourage every member to make positive contribution towards the development of our state. The era of nonchalant attitude of members of executive is over. Each of us will give report of our stewardship of office regularly.”

    He praised his predecessor, Tajudeen Lamidi, for the achievement recorded by in the past year, promising to consolidate the gains. Abideen extended hand of fellowship to his opponent, urging for support in moving the association to another level.

    Tajudeen urged the new leaders to be hardworking and responsive to the welfare of members.

  • Senator Tinubu to ward leaders: be open

    Senator Tinubu to ward leaders: be open

    The senator representing Lagos Central, Mrs. Oluremi Tinubu, has advised ward leaders to be open and free with members of their constituencies.

    She spoke at a meeting with local government ward leaders at her constituency office in Yaba.

    Senator Tinubu described the leaders as the first contact with the people.

    The lawmaker said: “Words cannot quantify the support I have received from these constituents.

    “It is my belief that we have achieved so much with the first four years mandate given to us and I feel the need to do more.

    “This is indeed a very critical time for our nation but I strongly believe we shall, irrespective of distraction and overzealousness of some people, fulfill the change.

    “The Eighth Senate shall witness lots of activities for the people as promised. This will not go without the knowledge of our party leaders; that is why we have decided to sustain some of our programmes, including our quarterly Town Hall meetings, Youth Empowerment and Skill Acquisition Scheme (YESA), Petty Trader Empowerment Capital Scheme (PETECS) and the elder citizen initiative.

    “It is our duty to be accountable and responsible to our constituents.

    “Also, as leaders, I urge you to be accountable and open, show the people kindness.

    “It is practically irresponsible and unacceptable to neglect the people in these trying times. With them lies the power; that is what the party has been preaching.”

    Senator Tinubu presented 220 GCE forms to the leaders to be distributed to the youths and scholarships to six undergraduates of New Era Foundation.