Tag: legal

  • Legal, corporate giants shine at ESQ Awards, seek reforms

    Legal, corporate giants shine at ESQ Awards, seek reforms

    There is a need for renewed commitment to reform, transparency and ethical conduct in the judicial and corporate legal systems.

    The call was made at the ESQ Nigerian Legal Awards 2025 in Lagos, where legal practitioners, business executives, academics and public policy leaders gathered to celebrate outstanding achievements in the profession.

    The event had the theme: “Celebrating the important contribution of lawyers to businesses.”

    It reflected the indispensable role of legal practitioners in shaping economic development, negotiating complex business deals and sustaining governance frameworks across different sectors of the economy.

    Founder of The Elevation Church, Pastor Godman Akinlabi, who gave the keynote address, stressed that Nigeria’s progress depends heavily on the integrity and leadership of its legal professionals, describing the legal system as the backbone of any functioning society.

    He said: “It is practically impossible to build a strong nation without a strong legal body. The foundations of our country are weakening, and the responsibility rests on everyone in the legal space to rebuild them with integrity, value-driven practice and ethical responsibility.”

    He expressed concern over the declining public trust in the judiciary, noting that the profession was once regarded as the guardian of justice and moral order.

    Read Also: Judicial impunity: ‘NJC being strengthened to bite harder’ – Kekere-Ekun

    “It breaks my heart that the legal profession, once one of the most respected in society, is increasingly being associated with corruption and political manipulation. Meaningful work that stands the test of time is built on values and legacy,” he lamented.

    Lere Fasola, Founder and Publisher of ESQ Legal Blitz and Convener of the Awards, described the Nigerian Legal Awards as the “Grammy of the legal profession”.

    He said the goal was not only to honour exceptional lawyers but also to emphasise the strategic role they play in enabling business growth.

    “Lawyers are the powerhouse behind major business transactions. They structure deals, conduct due diligence, ensure compliance and resolve disputes.

    “Without lawyers, many of the major investments and economic activities in this country simply would not happen,” he said.

    He acknowledged the challenge of sponsorship but urged companies and public institutions to support platforms that encourage accountability, innovation and institutional development in the legal system.

    Fashola added: “Our responsibility goes beyond recognition. It is to inspire a generation that will strengthen the rule of law and build institutions that endure.”

    The Awards’ judging panel, chaired by the head of Stephenson Harwood’s Africa and India groups, Kamal Shah, noted a steady rise in the sophistication and global relevance of Nigerian legal practice.

    “What we see emerging from Nigeria today is a legal market that is not only competitive but increasingly influential on the global stage.

    “However, young lawyers must broaden their knowledge, become commercially aware and seek mentorship to stay relevant.” he said.

    The awardee, Khadija Belgore Yusuf, Head of Legal and Compliance at Rendeavour/Alaro City, described the award as a testament to hard work and equal opportunity in the profession.

    “Gender, age or background should not be barriers. What matters is competence, focus and dedication,” she said.

    General Counsel of Zenith Bank, Michael Osilama, emphasised that legal reforms must remain continuous, particularly to address working conditions and remuneration for young lawyers.

    “The profession is evolving, and reforms must evolve with it. Mentorship is key to preserving the values of law as a noble profession,” he said.

    The evening celebrated outstanding achievements across the legal industry, with several notable recognitions presented.

    Olaniwun Ajayi was honoured as Law Firm of the Year in Project Finance and Intellectual Property.

    Aluko & Oyebode received multiple awards, including top recognition in Aviation, Banking & Finance, Immigration, Media & Entertainment, as well as a Regional Excellence Award.

    G. Elias & Co. was recognised for excellence in Mergers & Acquisitions, Labour & Employment, and Mining.

    Individual honours also highlighted exceptional leadership and contribution. Dr. Tolu Adeyemi received the Business Law Award, Bisoye Akoka received Business Law of the Year, while Albo was named Regulatory Team of the Year. Olakunle Williams received the Group Business Icon Award, and Rilwan Idris was awarded Managing Partner of the Year.

    Slingstone LP was celebrated as Law Firm of the Year, and Newswire took home the Law Blog of the Year Award.

    The Nigerian Legal Awards continues to serve as a symbol of excellence and a platform for advancing higher standards across the legal industry.

  • Legal giants: how to halt decline of ethical standards

    Legal giants: how to halt decline of ethical standards

    The 2025 Law Week of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ondo Branch, blended cultural vibrancy with rigorous legal discourse, reports UDEH ONYEBUCHI

    It was more than just a gathering of legal minds — it was a celebration of intellect, tradition, and community spirit.

    From a novelty football match against the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) to health walks, royal homage, spirited debates on ethics, and thought-provoking sessions on arbitration, technology, and bail administration, the 2025 Law Week of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ondo Branch lived up to its billing.

    The event brought together judges, senior advocates, academics, and young lawyers in an atmosphere of robust engagement.

    This year’s Law Week of the Ondo branch was its second ever, but it turned out to be the first of its kind.

    The novelty football match, held on August 10, ended in a 1-1 draw between the NBA and NMA teams.

    But the true highlight came during the two-day lecture series, which drew speakers from the top echelon of the Bar and Bench, offering insights of profound significance to legal practice, particularly in ethics and arbitration.

    The event teed off with a welcome address by the Law Week Committee Chairman, Remigius Akinbinu, followed by opening remarks from Branch Chairman, Henry Akingbesote. The keynote address was delivered on August 12  by Prof. Yusuf Olaolu Ali (SAN).

    Speaking on the theme, “Dying Embers of Professional Ethics: Blunted Sword of the Gatekeepers,” Ali dissected the decline of ethical standards in the legal profession.

    He traced the historical foundations of professional ethics, analysed the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners (RPC, 2007), and identified symptoms, root causes, and consequences of ethical decay.

    According to him, misconduct, erosion of public trust, and commercialisation of professional duty were all symptomatic of decline.

    Weak institutional frameworks, poor mentorship, financial pressures, inadequate professional development, and failures of oversight bodies such as the NBA, NJC, and LPDC were listed as root causes.

    Ali warned that compromised ethics have grave consequences for justice delivery and society, including judicial corruption, erosion of the rule of law, and loss of international credibility.

    However, he also offered remedies: strengthening disciplinary mechanisms, restoring legal education standards, promoting continuing education, improving welfare for lawyers, and shielding the profession from political and commercial interference.

    Read Also: 1 in 4 Nigerian men tested are not biological fathers – Smart DNA report

    “All stakeholders must rise with courage, vision, and integrity,” he declared. “Ethics must cease to be a lofty ideal and become the lived reality of every practitioner.”

    Discussants, including Dr Wahab Shittu (SAN) and Muyiwa Akinboro (SAN), reinforced Ali’s position.

    Shittu lamented a culture of silence among practitioners and a “not my business” attitude that allows misconduct to thrive.

    He pointed to economic pressures, overwork, and lax oversight as enablers of ethical shortcuts.

    Akinboro and Sule Usman (SAN) stressed the urgency of decisive action before the profession suffers “total ethical death.”

    Other sessions also broadened the scope of discussions.

    Justice Olabode Adegbehingbe of the Court of Appeal, who chaired the opening, urged lawyers to uphold national and global standards.

    Mrs. Titilola Akinlawon (SAN) spoke on “Legal Technology in the Administration of Justice,” while Prof. Foluke Dada-Lawanson and Dr. Dickson Ogunfuyi highlighted both the challenges and opportunities of adopting technology. Ogunfuyi cited Ondo State’s home-grown Court Information Management System (CoMiS) as an example of successful innovation.

    On Wednesday, attention shifted to “Bail Administration in Nigeria: Balancing the Presumption of Innocence and Public Interest.”

    Edo State Attorney-General, Dr Samson Osagie, who was the guest speaker, examined constitutional provisions and the discretionary powers of courts in granting bail.

    Discussants, including Justice Taiwo Taiwo (Rtd.) and Magistrate Samuel Sekooni, stressed the need for more realistic bail conditions and measures to reduce prison congestion caused by awaiting-trial detainees.

    The concluding session focused on “Beyond Reforms in the Arbitration and Mediation Act 2024,” with Oluwaseyilayo Ojo (SAN), as the guest speaker.

    Discussants, including Mrs. Oyinkansola Badejo-Okusanya and Mofesomo Tayo Oyetibo (SAN), explored opportunities in arbitration and mediation for Nigerian legal practitioners.

    The week also celebrated cultural and social bonding. A gala dinner treated participants to Ondo and Nigerian delicacies.

    Awards were presented to distinguished guests, including Prof. Ali, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) and former Governor of Ondo State Dr. Olusegun Mimiko.

    The most emotional moment came with a posthumous award to the late Mrs. Okadazim Niella Makinde for her outstanding contributions to the Ondo City Bar — a poignant reminder that true service leaves lasting imprints.

    In all, the 2025 Ondo City Law Week not only spotlighted pressing issues in the profession but also rekindled a collective resolve: to strengthen ethics, embrace innovation, and ensure that the legal profession remains a sharp, unyielding guardian of justice.

  • Stakeholders seek legal structure for school safety

    Stakeholders seek legal structure for school safety

    Stakeholders have stressed the need for a legal framework for safety in schools.

    They spoke during a public hearing, titled:  “A Public Hearing on the Implementation for a Legal Framework and Resource Plan on Safe Schools.”

    It was  organised by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Women Advocates Research and Documentation Center(WARDC), West Africa Network for Peace-building(WANEP), Syndicate In Supporting Women And Children Initiative(SISWACHI), and supported by United Nations Democracy Funds (UNDEF).

    The event took place at the Nigeria Institute for Advanced Legal Studies, University of Lagos (UNILAG), Akoka, Lagos.

    Chief Education Officer of Education District 6, Maryland, Lagos, Mrs. Adeola Adeoye Oluwayemisi, emphasised the urgency of addressing insecurity in schools.

    “We must come together and fight insecurity in schools. The safety of our children is paramount. We see what happens outside, which is why we need to come together as one family to tackle issues such as rape and banditry,” she stated.

    Mrs. Oluwayemisi also highlighted the importance of community involvement in ensuring school safety. “We can tackle these issues through organising seminars and symposiums like this, which should involve stakeholders and community elders to exchange ideas and knowledge. We cannot do it alone,” she added.

    State Coordinator for Civil Society Action for Education for All, Lagos axis, Stella Francis, pointed out the gap between policy creation and implementation.

     “It is clear we have a lot of policies, but implementation is a challenge. We need to go beyond policies and make them into law. All stakeholders in the education sector must ensure these laws are implemented. The safety of our students is crucial,” she said.

    Director of the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Lagos and Executive Director of WARDC, Dr. Agboola Akiyode-Afolabi, stressed the importance of safety education for students.

    Read Also: Economic sabotage: NNPCL, NMDPRA, others deny complicity

    “Safety is what the children should learn in school and practice as part of their lives. We can see the case of the Chibok girls and other incidents. The program today aims to teach the need for self-awareness around schools. Safety should be the responsibility of all, not just the schools,” she said.

    Dr. Akiyode-Afolabi highlighted that despite having a school safety policy since 2021, little progress has been made. She emphasised the need for strong security measures and greater awareness to ensure these laws are effectively implemented.

    Ifeoma Semilore, representing the Dean of the Faculty of Law, emphasized the need for a legal framework. “The government needs to put a legal framework in place, not just policies. It depends on the goodwill of the government to make it a law and emphasize it. There should be provisions of guidelines and infrastructure in our schools,” she said.

    Deputy Vice Chancellor of UNILAG, Prof. Ayodele Atsenua, highlighted the various safety measures taken by the university.

    “Safety is not just about kidnapping attacks. In UNILAG, we have made efforts, but we can do better. We have an anti-bullying policy, fire outbreak protocols, and sexual harassment policies, which many students do not know about because they refuse to read them. We try to inculcate these into our orientation for new students. Safety should become an integral part of our being,” she said.

  • ‘Fund Legal Aid Council’

    ‘Fund Legal Aid Council’

    Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) has been urged to provide funds for the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria (LACON) to enable it prosecute and defend the indigent in need of legal assistance.

    The Convener, Duty Solicitors Network (DSN) Bayo Akinlade, made the request on its WhatsApp social platform.

    While insisting on the need for the AGF to ensure that the Legal Aid Fund is set, Akinlade also appealed to well-meaning Nigerians and other human rights groups to demand that the Legal Aid Fund is activated and utilised.

    He further urged members of the House of Representatives and the Senate to ensure that they  earmark funds to the Legal Aid Fund that will be used to provide probono legal services to their respective constituencies.

     “The Legal Aid Act 2011, in line with international standards, provides for the establishment of the legal aid and access to justice fund into which financial assistance would be made available to the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria (LACON) on behalf of the indigent citizens to prosecute their claims in accordance with the Constitution and further to empower the existing Legal Aid Council to be responsible for the operation of a scheme for the grant of legal aid and access to justice in certain matters or proceedings to persons with inadequate resources in accordance with the provision of this Act.

    “The Legal Aid Council of Nigeria is no doubt well placed to deliver justice to the people and it is this belief that the Nigerian Law Society (NLS) in collaboration with DSN will initiate a campaign to establish this legal aid fund”, he said.

    Read Also: Sanwo-Olu gets kudos for prmoting unity

    Akinlade who contended that it is the duty of the National Assembly to set aside funds for the provision of Legal Aid to deserving citizens said the Nigerian Law Society (NLS) and DSN are ready to demand for what is due to the people and to ensure that they have access to justice.

    He lamented that due to the level of injustice and abuse of power in Nigeri today, many people are suffering and do not have access to justice through the courts, adding that the  situation has made the poor utterly helpless and even more vulnerable and leading to an increase in crime within our communities.

    “The courts being the last hope of the common man has become an illusion, nobody believes this anymore hence the new phrase “go to court” if you feel aggrieved because we know you may not even get through its gates talk less of walking within its corridors”, he lamented.

    He asked: “Is the National Assembly serious about letting the poor breathe? Is the Attorney General of the Federation going to live up to his reputation as a man of honour and a protector of the weak?”

  • Wanted: legal framework on integration of ex-offenders

    Wanted: legal framework on integration of ex-offenders

    Stakeholders in the criminal justice sector have urged the National Assembly to enact a law to ensure proper re-integration of ex-offenders into the society.

    The request was made during a national webinar on the celebration of  the ‘Yellow Ribbon’ campaign 2023 to sensitise and create awareness on how ex-offenders can be properly re-integrated into the society.

    The webinar was organised by PRAWA in collaboration with the Nigerian Correctional Service (NCS).

    The  Executive Director of PRAWA, Dr. Uju Agomoh, said ex-offenders deserve a second chance, emphasising that effective reformation, rehabilitation and reintegration of ex-offenders cannot be achieved through hate and stigmatisation.

    Agomoh said that the idea on the yellow ribbon message is not for the country alone but an international message on the need to reform ex- offenders and what the community can do to assist them.

      “The motion of yellow ribbon is to make the community safer and give a second chance to offenders as well as removing bad stigmatisation.”

    According to her, ” it is important to know that, there are people in custody that are innocent, some who committed a lesser offence and do community service. It is a concept to engage those who are in conflict with the law.”

    Read Also: Bayelsa poll: We’re confident of victory despite legal setback, says APC

     Deputy Controller General of Corrections (DCG ), Non-Custodial, Nigerian Correctional Service (NCS) M. I Atta, assured PRAWA of the support of the service on the proposed bill on re-integration of the ex-offenders, noting that the bill is aimed at given hope to the hopeless.

    DCG Atta remarked that stigmatisation affects reintegration of ex-offenders into the society adding,  “a situation where people reject an ex-convict which makes them go back into crime.”

      He said apart from the skill acquisition which inmates are equipped with in the correctional centres, they also signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Open National University through which inmates get more education and obtained degrees that can make them useful to the society.

     Chairman, National Parole Board, Justice Suleman Galadima(rtd) said the cycle of correction  of offenders cannot be complete without a proper programme of getting them settled back into society.

      According to him: ” Experience has shown that the process of settling back into the society has always been hampered by the attitude of members of the society when they refused to forgive these ex-offenders, reject , stigmatise and make it difficult for them to find their feet again and provide for themselves.

     “The Yellow Ribbon project is a noble initiative because it is targeted at breaking barriers against ex-offenders, it preaches ‘second chance’, ‘non-stigmatisation’, unlocking of the ‘Second Prison’ and giving reformed ex-inmates opportunities to thrive.

    “A successfully re-integrated ex-offender can hardly go back to a life of crime and this is to the benefit of our society.

     “I consider this webinar a confirmation of the Controller General and in fact all officers of the Correctional Service’ commitment to the new approach of the ‘Service ‘ to corrections.

    “Leading on the Yellow Ribbon initiative and connecting to the society on this is one of the ways the Service has shown acknowledgment of the role of every member of the society in ensuring proper management of offenders”, he said

    Justice Galadima also noted that the campaign also supports deepening of the implementation of the innovative provisions of the Nigerian Correctional Service Act 2019  especially the Section 2 (1) (a-d).

    “The Yellow Ribbon Campaign speaks directly to the work of Parole Board Members. Section 468 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 and relevant sections of the Laws of the different states of the federation provide that a deserving incarcerated person can be granted early release and Section 40 of the Nigerian Correctional Service Act 2019 empowers the Controller General to appoint  Parole Board Members for this purpose.

    “The laws provide for early supervised release of offenders on long term incarceration who are of good behaviour and have learned a skill or acquired education while in custody to enable them start the process of reintegration back into the society.

    “As Board members, we are interested in the message of non-stigmatisation, second chance and reintegration as this will benefit persons released on parole and other ex-offenders. The National Parole Board members of the 36 states and the FCT therefore stand with the Nigerian Correctional Service on this and are ever ready to support any progressive initiative of the Service”, he said

  • Wanted: potent legal framework for business restructuring, insolvency

    Wanted: potent legal framework for business restructuring, insolvency

    Legal and financial experts have called for an efficient legal and regulatory framework for business restructuring and insolvency.

    They said there was a need for a special court to ease the resolution of insolvency cases, as well as more government support and financing for businesses.

    They spoke in Lagos at the 2023 international conference of the Business Recovery & Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN).

    It had the theme: “Insolvency and restructuring law and practice in Nigeria: Looking to the Future.”

    Speakers examined how to restructure Nigeria’s rising debt burden, which hit N87.38trillion at the end of the second quarter.

    They also explored how the country’s restructuring and insolvency framework can be optimally utilised as a tool for economic growth.

    The role of the judiciary in promoting a sustainable rescue culture, as well as opportunities offered by the African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement (AfCFTA), were also in focus.

    The two-day event opened with keynote speeches by former Attorney-General of the Federation Mr Kanu Agabi (SAN), and President/Chairman of Council, Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria (CIBN), Dr Ken Opara.

    Agabi noted that some corporate entities become insolvent due to a lack of support from the government, and a weak regulatory framework.

    “Wrong government policies are responsible for the collapse of businesses and the naira,” the former AGF said.

    He urged the government to do more to help businesses survive, especially by cutting down on imports.

    Agabi faulted the importation of over 70 per cent of the goods consumed, saying no economy can grow that way.

    “The business environment is not conducive. The government must go out of its way to help businesses,” he said.

    The former AGF slammed what he described as a patronage system in which merit does not count.

    Dr Opara, represented by CIBN Director of Economics & Strategy, Dr Oreitan Adigun, said the existing legal framework for business recovery and insolvency practice is “stagnant”.

    He stressed the need to continually enhance the capacity of insolvency practitioners. 

    To him, the finance industry is the economic lifeblood, while the legal sector is the backbone that provides its structure, stability and protection – both working together for a powerful economic system.

    Dr Opara said: “In the ever-evolving landscape of finance and economics, the importance of insolvency and restructuring law cannot be overstated.

    Read Also: Impeachment: Protesters warn against lawmakers’ muscling

    “These areas play a pivotal role in ensuring stability and resilience of our financial system, protecting investors and facilitating economic growth.”

    Citing a World Bank report, he noted that Nigeria ranks 157 out of 190 economies in the world in terms of ease of resolving insolvency cases, with a total score of 28.6 out of 100, performing below the regional average of sub-Saharan Africa of about 35 points and the global average of 50.1.

    He said despite the insolvency regulations introduced by the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), there are still challenges and gaps that need to be addressed.

    These gaps, the CIBN President said, can be addressed by creating a comprehensive framework for cross-border insolvency recognition and enforcement, establishing a specialised court or tribunal for insolvency matters, and enhancing the capacity of practitioners.

    Senior Partner at Punuka Attorneys & Solicitors, Dr Anthony Idigbe (SAN), who chaired the first session, stressed the need for an effective legal framework and strong supporting institutions for insolvency management.

    He said: “For insolvency and restructuring to have the desired impact, there must be an effective legal framework, supporting government policies and competent institutions and professionals.

    “Other requirements are adequate insolvency and bankruptcy laws, efficient judicial systems, access to financing for business restructuring, and professional expertise.”

    Pioneer Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Section on Business Law (SBL), George Etomi, spoke on the need to open up the legal service space through the AfCFTA.

    Dismissing fears that opening up the borders to foreign lawyers could take jobs away, he said it was only a matter of time before cross-border legal service became the norm.

    “If we don’t broaden our focus, we’ll be like big fishes in small ponds. We need to remove the mental block that we’re threatened.

    “We should amend the Legal Practitioners Act and make allowance for others to come and practice here,” Etomi said.

    Associate Professor at Singapore Management University, Dr Aurelie Gurrea-Martinez, called for a further amendment of laws “to make insolvency proceedings more efficient”.

    He added: “We need to think about insolvency laws differently, and insolvency tools should be optimisable for growth and for maximising returns.”

    Gurrea-Martinez urged the government to address issues around institutional weaknesses, weak rule of law and corruption, which he noted are “big problems” in most emerging economies, including Nigeria.

    BRIPAN President, Mr Richard Akintunde, said the economic reforms of the Bola Tinubu Administration have resulted in the high cost of petrol, high exchange rate, rise in the cost of food, among others.

    All of these, he noted, provide opportunities for insolvency practitioners.

    Akintunde said: “Businesses are feeling the pinch of these economic reforms. According to the President of the Nigerian Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (NASME), 10 per cent of about 40 million micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) have shut down their operations since the removal of the petrol subsidy.

    “Some international companies have either scaled down their business operations or shut down completely. Rising public debt is also a matter of serious concern.

    “These kinds of problems create opportunities for Insolvency practitioners.

    “As leaders in the restructuring and insolvency space in Nigeria and with the network of practitioners we have all over the world, BRIPAN is poised to provide rescue solutions and other options for a prosperous and sustainable future for businesses and companies in Nigeria.”

    Chairman of the Conference Planning Committee, Mr Albert Folorunsho, said in choosing the theme, BRIPAN took into cognisance the significant reforms in the insolvency and restructuring space in recent times.

    “In the last three years, Nigeria’s 30-year-old CAMA, 21-year-old Banks and Other Financial Institutions Act and 14-year-old Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation have been repealed and re-enacted,” he said.

    According to him, the conference was designed to examine, forecast and chart a future course for insolvency and restructuring law and practice in Nigeria.

    Other economists, legal and financial experts who spoke were Dr Chinyere Almona, Dr Olusegun Omisakin, Olawale Akoni (SAN), Justice Ebiowei Tobi of the Court of Appeal, Dr Olawakemi Pinheiro (SAN), Mr Kofo Salam-Alada and Henry Fomah.

    Others were Ms Oluwaseun Mamoye, Richard Healey, Ms. Samira Musayeva, Amala Umeike, Rogers Turyasingura, Michael Out, Haruna Jalo-Waziri, Oluwaseyi Fayemi, Bidemi Olumide, Ms. Jenifer Omonhe and David Ekanem.

    The conference ended with a gala night, which had the theme: “Africa futurism”.

  • ‘Why we’re expanding legal aid scheme’

    ‘Why we’re expanding legal aid scheme’

    The Zion Prayer Movement Outreach, Lagos has expanded its pro bono legal aid scheme across the country, saying its foundation arm is recording a growing number of people who urgently need but cannot afford legal assistance.

    The movement’s founder and Spiritual Director, Chukwuebuka Anozie Obi, said the project was also in line with Christ’s example of helping the indigent.

    Evangelist Obi spoke at the Movement’s headquarters at Okota, Lagos on Saturday while inaugurating a team of 41 lawyers dedicated to rendering free legal services to poor persons identified through the scheme.

    He said this large number of legal practitioners would greatly assist in expanding the already substantial work of Zion Prayer Movement’s work with the poor.

    The cleric noted that injustice was a problem faced by everyone, irrespective of race, gender or religion, adding that the scheme was open to anyone, whether members of the church or not.

    Obi said: “I used to go on prison visits. Some people are locked up in prison for five, six, seven years they have not even gone to court.

    “I know some of them have paid some lawyers and they got them released. Some will tell you that eight years now they have not gone to court. For such cases, that is the reason why we established this Zion legal team, to help.

    “We’re going to move to different prisons, helping people there. We are in a society where if you don’t have money nobody recognises you, you are nobody.

    “There are thousands of people locked up in prisons because they don’t have money and their families have no one to call on for help.

    “So they remain there for years, despite some of them being innocent. Some are not even guilty of anything, but they are there because they have nobody to stand for them. That’s one of the reasons I set up this legal team, to be help people.”

    The cleric added that one of the social justice problem the church will be tackling is the issue of unauthorized, illegal handling and desecration of cadavers.

    Read Also: Impeachment: Protesters warn against lawmakers’ muscling

    He cited the case of a woman that approached him seeking help to recover her relative’s corpses that was being forcibly held in a shrine in the East, long after the death had occurred, noting that there were also videos of shrine operators making videos of the corpses that they held and syndicating same online to terrorise people.

    Obi condemned this practice, adding that the Movement would, through its lawyers, liaise with the National Assembly, law enforcement and other government agencies to end this problem.

    One of the leaders of the legal team, who spoke for the others, Mr Emmanuel Omeje, pledged the lawyers full commitment to the cause.

    Omeje warned those unlawfully holding onto corpses were breaking, adding that they were not mortuaries.

    He noted that such people are known to threaten the families of the deceased with dead by diabolical means, to scare them from approaching law enforcement agencies.

    Omeje said: “This menace of desecrating corpses in shrines, and commercialising it while traumatising their families with death if they complain, – they are also using it to show their purported powers online – this menace is a crime under our criminal laws, punishable by imprisonment upon conviction.”

  • Wanted: Legal framework for cryptocurrency transaction

    Cryptocurrency transactions, as the name implies, are shrouded in secrecy. Amid fear that they can be used for money laundering and terrorist financing, participants at a seminar on cryptocurrency and money laundering, organised by the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), have called for legal framework on virtual currency. JOSEPH JIBUEZE reports.

    Should cryptocurrency be jettisoned due to its risks and potential for abuse? No, say legal and financial experts. To them, cryptocurrency is like a train that has left the station; its momentum cannot be halted.

    For National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) Director-General Dr Isa Ibrahim, the adoption of cryptocurrency is only a matter of time, so the government must gear up for its challenges.

    Ibrahim believes there are enormous financial and economic benefits  in cryptocurrency, despite its potential for abuse.

    “Cryptocurrency will challenge the very need for banks, stock markets and other government sanctioned intermediaries,” he said.

    The anonymity that cryptocurrency offers and its decentralised nature means it could be tool for money laundering and terrorist financing.

    Ibrahim said: “The innovativeness of a criminally-minded person is incredible. A desperate person seeking to ward off law enforcement agencies would see cryptocurrency as a veritable means of money transformation.”

    Ibrahim was the keynote speaker at a two-day seminar organised by the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) in Abuja.

    It theme was: “Understanding the interface between Cryptocurrency and Money Laundering.”

    Chaired by Senate Committee on Anti-Corruption and Financial Crimes Chairman Senator Chukwuka Utazi, it featured speakers from the Ministry of Justice, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), as well as investigators and cyber-crime/telecoms law experts.

    Ibrahim noted that Nigeria’s anti-money laundering laws “were made in respect of local and foreign legal tenders”.

    According to him, “the phenomenon of cryptocurrency is not envisaged” when the laws were drafted.

    To underscore its money laundering potential, Ibrahim cited an unnamed politically exposed person who converted N1.2 billion to cryptocurrency in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

    “In essence, Nigeria has no current legal regime to prevent the use of cryptocurrency as a tool of money laundering.

    “The consequences of this exposure are grave, especially considering their implications on our anti-graft war,” he said.

     

    Understanding cryptocurrency

     

    A cryptocurrency is a digital asset designed to work as a medium of exchange. It is a kind of alternative currency or digital currency, of which virtual currency is a subset.

    The digital representation of value is neither issued by a central bank or a public authority. It is unregulated digital money, which is issued and usually controlled by its developers and accepted among the members of a specific virtual community.

    According to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), virtual currency is a digital representation of value that can be digitally traded, and which functions as a medium of exchange, a unit of account and/or a stored value, but does not have the legal tender status in any jurisdiction.

    Bitcoin is considered the first decentralised cryptocurrency. Over 4,000 alternative variants of bitcoin are said to have been created since 2009.

    It allows users to transact directly, peer to peer, without a middle man to manage the exchange of funds. Unlike traditional (or fiat) currencies and assets, bitcoin is portable, divisible and irreversible.

    As a global currency, bitcoin can be sent to anyone, anywhere in the world without worrying about cross border remittance fees. No entity can lock users out of their funds.

     

    How it works

     

    The underlying technology of cryp-tocurrency is the blockchain, according to Ibrahim, who was represented by a senior legal officer at NITDA, Mr Olufemi Daniel.

    He said cryptocurrency uses decentralised control as opposed to centralised digital currency and central banking systems.

    The decentralised control of each cryptocurrency works through distributed ledger technology, typically a blockchain, which serves as a public financial transaction database.

    A blockchain, Ibrahim explained, is a growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked using cryptography – the practice and study of techniques for secure communication that prevents third parties (adversaries) from reading private messages.

    According to Ibrahim, a blockchain, like the internet, has a robust architecture and cannot be controlled by a single entity.

    “Blockchains are distributed, not centralised; open, not hidden; inclusive, not exclusive; immutable, not alterable, and secure.

    “Blockchain promises transaction transparency and incorruptibility. The data is embedded within the network as a whole. Alteration of any information on the blockchain can only be effected by a swift, simultaneous overriding of every computer on the entire network.

    “With all its potential, blockchain can be a force for good in our world today. The biggest application of blockchain today is cryptocurrency,” he said.

    A cybercrime/telecom law expert Dr Uchenna Orji said key actors in crytocurrency transactions are the exchanger (who converts real currency to virtual currency), the administrator (who maintains a central payment ledger), the user (who transacts in virtual currency) and the miner (who applies special software to solve complex algorithms to validate transactions).

    According to him, a user needs to get a digital currency wallet, which is a software application or any other medium for holding, storing and transferring virtual currencies.

    “Basically, a virtual currency wallet holds a user’s private keys and enables the user to spend virtual currency allocated to the virtual currency address in the blockchain,” he said.

     

    Money laundering potential

     

    According to Orji, a Research Associate at the African Centre for Cyber Law and Cybercrime Prevention (ACCP), Kampala, Uganda, virtual currency transactions have a very high degree of anonymity.

    Parties do not have to provide verified identification information before accounts are opened or transactions are made.

    Traditional due diligence protocols, which financial institutions are required to undertake (such as the Know Your Customer requirements) are not an embedded feature of virtual currency transactions.

    Cryptocurrency transactions are carried out fast and are usually within seconds due to the absence of traditional funds transfer protocols, he said.

    Orji said such transactions can be carried out in any country that is connected to the internet and cost far less when compared to traditional financial transactions that have attendant unauthorised bank charges.

    “The Bitcoin protocol does not also require or provide for the identification and verification of participants, and neither does it generate historical records of transactions associated with the real identities of persons or entities.

    “In addition, there is no anti-money laundering software for  monitoring and identifying suspicious transaction patterns and neither is there any central body regulating the Bitcoin platform.

    “All these elements make virtual currency platforms and transactions difficult for state actors to exercise regulatory measures and thereby increasing the potential that they can be used to carry out money laundering and terrorist financing operations,” Orji said.

     

    Calls for regulation

    The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is not unaware of the challenges posed by cryptocurrencies.

    CBN Governor Godwin Emefiele, quoting coinmarketcap.com, said cryptocurrency’s global market capitalisation stood at $203billion in October.

    Represented by a senior CBN official Mr K. N. Amugo, Emefiele said the cryptocur-rency market in Nigeria is unregulated.

    “At present, there is no legal framework for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in Nigeria. Based on legislations, the usage of cryptocurrency in Nigeria is neither permitted nor prohibited,” he said.

    Pending formal regulation, Emefiele said the CBN constituted an inter-agency committee on virtual currencies, comprising regulators and law enforcement agencies. Their mandate, he said, is carry out studies on the subject.

    Also, the committee is empower to build staff capacity and issu cautionary public notices. Emefiele said the CBN issued a circular to banks and other financial institutions to ensure that their customers who are virtual currency exchangers have effective anti-money laundering/combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) controls that enable them comply with identification, verification and transactions monitoring requirements.

    Banks were also directed to render suspicious transaction reports to the Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), he added.

     

    Utazi: why legal framework is needed

     

    Senator Utazi emphasised that virtual platforms of value exchange, such as cryptocurrency, were becoming the new order.

    According to him, there is “a murky, loosely regulated framework” for the use of cryptocurrencies, which he said rely on cryptography that uses hidden codes to communicate.

    “Users can make transactions directly under pseudonyms, taking away power of control from banks and governments, and it is not controlled by a central authority.

    “This scenario creates a monstrosity of huge proportions for governments and regulatory authorities,” he said.

    The lawmaker said cryptocurrency could be used to hide ill-acquired assets and to sponsor terrorism.

    “There should be legislative and regulatory frameworks that understand the dynamics of this genre of economic activity to place society a step ahead of its rapid evolution.

    “There is, therefore, a need for tighter regulation. The associated risks of virtual currencies mutate everyday and it is important that all stakeholders understand what these risks are, and what legislative, regulatory and criminal justice responses to them should be,” Senator Utazi said.

     

    Sagay: ‘dark side’ of cryptocurrency worrisome

     

    PACAC Chairman Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) said while cryptocurrency yields benefits to those providing the service or trading with it, it was like a “stateless phenomenon” that poses challenges.

    The almost invisible and decentralised nature of virtual currencies, he emphasised, creates a potential for them to be used for money laundering and terrorist financing.

    To him, the questions are how to regulate trading in virtual currencies and how to prevent them from being used as an avenue for crime.

    “There is a dark side, which includes the use of cryptocurrency for criminal activities.

    “Due to the upswing in the use of virtual currencies by criminal groups, legislative and regulatory frameworks need to be adapted and updated in response to these new challenges, particularly to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing.

    “Because of the encrypted nature of cryptocurrency, operators evade tax. It is necessary that there should be some regulations provided in this sector in order to prevent it from being a new avenue for criminal activities and evasion of social responsibility,” Sagay said.

     

    Tackling money laundering

     

     The Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act of 2011, which applies to “financial institutions and designated non-financial institutions”, can be stretched to regulate cryptocurrency transactions, Orji said.

    Section 2 (1) of the Act provides that the transfer of funds or securities “by a person or body corporate, including a money service business” of a sum exceeding US$10,000 or its equivalent shall be reported to the CBN, Securities and Exchange Commission or the EFCC in writing within seven days from the date of the transaction.

    Orji pointed out that Section 25 of the Act defines “money service business” to include “currency dealers, money transmitters, cheque cashers, and issuers of traveller’s cheques, money orders or stored value”.

    “Thus, Section 2(1) of the Act would imply with respect to virtual currencies that a money transmitter who is engaged in the business of transmitting funds for virtual currency operations is required to report any transfer of funds to or from a foreign country, where the sum exceeds US$10,000,” he said.

    Orji noted Section 6 of the Money Laundering Act provides for the reporting of suspicious transactions by financial institutions where such transactions involve “a frequency which is unjustifiable or unreasonable”.

    “Under the above provisions, a virtual currency user or operator that has received or converted virtual currency funds in his or her account with a financial institution in Nigeria can be reported to the EFCC where such funds qualify as suspicious transactions under the Act.

    “This is possible because of the broad classification of what constitutes a suspicious transaction under the Act,” Orji said.

    He said the scope of definitions of a “financial institution” and a “non-designated financial institution” under the Money Laundering Act should be expanded to cover virtual currency operations.

    This, he said, is so that the customer due diligence obligations, such as KYC, protocols and record keeping requirements can be imposed.

    He called for the establishment of a legal response that will require the registration of virtual currency exchangers so that regulatory and law enforcement authorities can regulate and monitor their operations.

    “It is necessary that regulatory responses are carefully studied and implemented to avoid stifling innovation.

    “In particular, regulatory responses that aim to out rightly ban the use of virtual currencies should be avoided in favour of risk-based regulatory measures,” he said.

    Federal Ministry of Justice Cybercrime Prosecution Unit Head Mr George Tyendezwa said international cooperation was paramount in tackling money laundering and terrorism financing through cryptocurrency.

    “Cryptocurrency can be used to buy gun. Or they can be the object of a crime. We need to regulate the exchanges,” he said.

    Besides, he believes that statutes need to be reviewed. “Laws need to reflect current realities in their definitions,” he said.

    He called for capacity building, arguing that the anonymity of cryptocurrency “is not absolute” as investigations can be done using “blockchain forensics”.

    “We must train people to ensure they are equipped to carry out the task. Online investigation requires patience, commitment and huge resources.

    “Train and retrain people to give them the tools they need to operate in this space,” he said.

    Senate Committee on ICT & Cybercrime Expert Group member Dr Olutoyin J. Oloniteru said legal, regulatory and policy challenges around cryptocurrency must be addressed.

    “Nigeria needs to wake up or else we’ll be 1000 years behind. If the Federal Government refuses to do the needful, we’ll be in serious trouble,” he said.

    Oloniteru, who founded the Digital Extra Blockchain Innovations Hub & Laboratory, believes the next generation will use cryptocurrency due to its advantages.

    According to him, “cryptocurrency means ‘maths money’” because it uses cryptography, which he said “is a branch of mathematics that has to do with hiding information using encryption”.

     

    Role of taxation

     

    Associate Professor of Law at the Kogi State University, Dr Josephine Agbonika, said taxation could be used to tackle money laundering through crypto-currency, if there is regulation.

    According to her, cryptocur-rencies are fast becoming an alternative for those seeking to diversify their investment portfolios.

    “The jump in the value of Bitcoin means that an investment, say of a few thousands of dollars a few years ago, may be worth $10,000 today.

    “So, like any investment – for example, stocks – you are liable to report the appreciation and pay tax on it.

    “Because of the astronomical rise in the value of the Bitcoin, the tax laws are far from catching up. Ideally, every time you transfer a cryptocurrency, you might trigger a gain and must pay the tax on it,” she said.

    According to her, the cryptocurrency market is huge. “In 2017, cryptocurrency had a market capitalisation of over $200 billion… A study conducted from data gathered from over 150 cryptocurrency companies and individuals, covering over 38 countries from five world regions revealed an estimated 2.9 million to 5.9 million unique active users of cryptocurrency wallets, and between 5.8 million and 11.5 million estimated ‘active’ wallets,” she said.

    Agbonika said taxing cryptocur-rency transactions as a control strategy may not be as easy as it seems.

    However, high-volume cryptocu-rrency transactions for which tax was not paid could lead to tax-crime investigation.

    On the need for a regulatory framework, she said: “Regulation may be needed to protect consumers and the wider financial system in essence.

    “Bitcoin and other cryptocur-rencies should not remain in a legal vacuum, without the appropriate supervision.

    “It is important the government issues modalities for individuals and companies participating in the trading of digital currencies.

    “The Money Laundering Act would also need to be amended to allow for the recognition of digital currencies.

    “A benchmark for trade in digital currencies should also be set to enable security agencies flag investigation into the trading and use of digital currencies to prevent terrorism amongst other nefarious acts.

    “With an unclear regulatory stance on cryptocurrencies in Nigeria and the constant delay being exhibited by the CBN in reeling regulations, it remains unseen how Nigeria expects to positively utilise the unruly product called cryptocurrency.

    “The ownership or possession of bitcoin, etherum or related cryptocurrencies is, therefore, not illegal in Nigeria. But failure to move legal tender makes it imperative that it cannot be taxed.”

     

    EFCC: beware of bogus offers

     

    An EFCC investigator Abdul-karim Chukkol emphasised that Bitcoin is a currency designed with anonymity in mind, and is frequently used when purchasing illegal goods and services.

    He warned about fake exchanges, saying many fake “crypto wallets” have sprung up in recent times in Nigeria with dubious mouth-watering money-doubling promises.

    Some of them, he said, actively encourage the recruitment of new investors to maximise profit, with promises of absurd returns and unclear mode of investment.

    Chukkol also warned about “pump and dump schemes”, in which “crypto groups with thousands of members manipulate the prices of coins…” and exploit the ignorant.

    He added the transactions are prone to impersonation, as scammers can act as crypto exchange support staff to dupe people of their crypto funds, or create fake accounts to impersonate genuine operators.

    On investigative challenges, Chukkol said: “The Darkweb and virtual currencies are designed to provide anonymity. Best chance of unmasking the criminal actors means finding a clear web connection.

    “Investigators have to use the tools used by criminals as well e.g. use of virtual currency, lingo etc. Accounts need to be anonymised and not tied to investigators identity whatsoever.”

    He said cultural distrust of others and difficulty in the arrest and prosecution of offenders arising in gathering of evidence and presentation of evidence in court, were other challenges.

    “We need to create regulatory frameworks to meet an evolving challenge. The same innovation that power virtual currencies can also help us regulate them.

    “Crypto exchanges should adopt the know your customer requirement. The use of biometrics, artificial intelligence and cryptography would let law enforcement agencies remove the pollution from the virtual currencies ecosystem.

    “We need an indispensable international cooperation in the investigation and prosecution of cases relating to virtual currencies,” he said.

     

    Owasanoye: don’t  be scammed

    PACAC Executive Secretary Prof Bolaji Owasanoye gave tips to avoid being defrauded: “If you don’t understand it, don’t get involved. If you receive a suspicious mail, delete it.

    “If the mail has an html attachment, don’t open it. It could lead to where your data could be harvested. When return on investment looks too good to be true, delete it.

    “Once the return on investment indicates you should bring someone else, turn it down. Beware of mails that come between 11pm and 5am. That is when scammers operate. Be realistic about expectations.

    “Greed is a major push factor. You could be educated but if you’re greedy, you could be scammed. If you’re not greedy, you have solved 80 per cent of your problem.”

    Owasanoye said the event was organised towards designing a legal regime for cryptocurrency. He said the outcome of the seminar would be shared with the National Assembly.

    “The truth of the matter is that we must regulate this. You cannot say ‘don’t do it’. That will be futile. We cannot run away from technology. When you regulate, you can separate the wheat from the chaff. That’s a way forward,” he said.

     

    Some recommendations

    Strengthen international ooperation in tackling money laundering via cryptocurrency
    •Expand the scope of Money Laundering Act definitions to cover cryptocurrency
    •Register virtual currency exchangers to monitor their operations
    •Build investigators’ capacity to operate in virtual currency space
    •Create regulatory frameworks to meet evolving challenge
    •Crypto exchanges should adopt know your customer requirements
    •Issue modalities for cryptocurrency traders for tax purposes

  • President’s actions legal- Falana

    Lawyer and human rights activist, Femi Falana (SAN), spoke to Sunday Oguntola on the legality of the awards and declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day

    HUMAN rights activist, Femi Falana (SAN), commended the Muhammadu Buhari-led administration for declaring June 12 as Democracy Day.

    He said: “The conferment of the posthumous national award of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) on Chief M. K. O. Abiola, the acclaimed winner of June 12, 1993 Presidential Election for his huge contribution to the restoration of democratic rule in Nigeria is historic.

    “By declaring June 12 Democracy Day, the federal government has officially validated the integrity of the fair and free election that was criminally annulled by the Ibrahim Babangida junta.

    “By recognising June 12 as Democracy Day, the federal government has put an end to the hypocrisy of May 29, which was proclaimed by the Olusegun Obasanjo regime.

    “By conferring the posthumous award of national award of Grand Commander of the Order of Niger (GCON), the federal government has officially endorsed his enormous contributions to the titanic battle against military dictatorship and promotion of human rights in Nigeria.

    “In addition to the historic gesture, the federal government should proceed to adopt Abiola’s Programme of Welfare to Poverty and respect the human rights of all Nigerian people, which Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN) defended in his life time.

    “In particular, the federal government should mark the first national Democracy Day on June 12, 2018 with the release of all citizens being detained illegally all over the country and immediate compliance with all valid and subsisting court orders.

    On legality of the national honours, Falana said: “The Honourable Justice Alfa Belgore, a retired Chief Justice of Nigeria, was reported to have questioned the legality of the decision of President Buhari to confer posthumous awards on Chief M. K. O. Abiola and Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN).

    “Curiously, his lordship did not refer to any section of the National Honours Act or any other law that has been violated by the President. In like manner, some persons have alleged that the June 12 holiday, declared by the President is illegal on the grounds that the approval of the National Assembly was not sought and obtained.

    “With profound respect to the Honourable Justice Alfa Belgore, the National Honours Act has not prohibited or restricted the powers of the President to confer national honours on deserving Nigerian citizens, dead or alive.

    “No doubt, paragraph 2 of the Honours Warrant made pursuant to the National Honours Act provides that “a person shall be appointed to a particular rank of an Order when he receives from the President in person, at an investiture held for the purpose…”

    “But paragraph 3 thereof has given the President the unqualified discretion “to dispense with the requirement of paragraph 2 in such manner as may be specified in the direction.”

    “Therefore, since the national awards conferred on Chief Abiola and Chief Fawehinmi cannot be received by them in person, the President may permit their family members to receive same on their behalf.

    “Furthermore, section 2 (1) of the Public Holidays Act stipulates that in addition to the holidays mentioned in the Schedule to the Act, the President may appoint a special day to be kept as a public holiday either throughout Nigeria or in any part thereof.

    “It is crystal clear that the President is not required by law to seek and obtain the approval of the National Assembly before declaring a public holiday in the country.”

    “In view of the combined effect of the National Honours Act and the Public Holidays Act, the legal validity of the well- deserved awards and the historic holiday has not been impugned in any manner whatsoever.”

  • ‘My dad threatened to disown me if i ever legalise my marriage’

    “I got pregnant nine years ago while dating my current husband and then the issue of marriage came up.

    I wasn’t working then. He told my family and I that he doesn’t want a court marriage for no reason.

    My parents tried talking to him, I cried and begged him severally to legalize his marriage with me but he stood his grounds not to wed me in a court.

    I involved his family members to help me beg him but they said, he’s old enough to make his decisions.

    He even refused to do a white wedding either because my church requested for a court certificate, so we ended up doing only traditional marriage.

    I later got tired and gave up on the matter. I was hurt and broken but I resolved to marry him like that just to save myself and my family the shame of having a baby outside wedlock.

    My dad was angry and disappointed in him but he didn’t care and because of that my dad vowed to see me a successful and independent woman with or without him.

    After I gave birth to my baby, my dad helped me secure a job with a multinational company and things started to turn around for me.

    I could now take care of myself and secure a future.

    Though I married my husband but I never forgave him from my heart and it made me not to do anything in my husband’s name.

    We currently have three kids together but all my properties are in the name of my children. I never used him as my next of kin either.

    Read Also: Wife finds her death certificate in husband’s car

    Just last month my company decided to transfer me to a branch in Texas and the company is willing to pay for my entire family to relocate with me.

    My husband’s business is not doing too well and he’s willing to relocate also but we have no legal certificate to show that we are married.

    Now he wants us to go to the court to legalize our marriage and I have said “No” My dad has threatened to disown me if I ever go with him to court.

    He’s been tagging me everywhere as a bad wife who is not loyal to her husband, spoiling my family also.

    He’s family members have been calling me trying to persuade me but I told them I’m old enough to make my decisions also and I have stood my ground just like he did to me nine years ago.”

    What is your advice for this young mother of three?

     

    You can also share your story with us on  info@thenationonlineng.net