Tag: Legislature

  • The legislature in Nigeria: Compromised, marginalised and endangered

    The legislature in Nigeria: Compromised, marginalised and endangered

    • By Hon. Olumuyiwa Jimoh

    Democracy in its various variants and manifestations has become an enduring and prevailing framework for governing societies in the recent past centuries. Its tentacle, appeal and reach is expanding diminishing constantly the spaces that despotism and other sub-optimal governance frameworks occupy globally. 

    It has proven to be thus far the best way for humanity to progressively organise production in a more stable and sustainable manner.

    The implication of this to national stability is that it has been generally agreed that nations that adopt this framework in organising themselves stand a better chance of creating a more stable and progressive society than others. 

    Flowing from this, we can easily summarise that any nation that therefore works outside this platform is doomed to operate at sub-optimal level thus unable to pursue in a more coherent way the mission to grow and develop its economy. 

    If this framework with all its imperfections is what offers humanity as it is today the best hope for continuous and sustainable development, and, that is also what Nigeria as a nation has fortunately chosen to operate, then it is our duty to ensure that we allow its very fine tenets and applications to operate unfettered without distortion both in theory and in its practices.

    A decapitated democracy offers no salvation to the people and becomes worse than other social constructs. It is stripped of its ability to deliver its full potentials to the nation. A pseudo democracy is lukewarm and cannot function properly and is unable to muster the needed leverage to drive national development. 

    A distorted democracy is akin to a tricycle without one of its leg. It will lay crippled, incapacitated without progress. That is the choice when a nation practices democracy in breach and its truly a kiss of death.

    Unfortunately for us in Nigeria, that is a horrible choice we seem to have made. In our present practice of democracy, the Legislature both at the federal and in all the states of the federation has become fully marginalised, compromised, subjugated and at best castrated. 

    There is always a struggle by the Executive arm of government to hijack its leadership and processes so that it can control its outcomes. This is unfortunately now the prevailing understanding. 

    The Executive pursue this as a conscious and deliberate agenda. I do not only think, I know that this poses a great danger not only to democracy but undermines national stability and cohesion.

    One of the basic principles of democratic practice is the critical provision for the Separation of Powers. This is functioned on the fact that democracy is anchored on a tripod – the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary. The fundamentality of this is founded on the fact that it is upon it that the idea of democratic checks and balances is built thus derives traction.

    Any attempt at fusing all these three arms into one arm becomes a movement or romance with despotism. It detracts from the sacred practice and defiles our politics contaminating it to an extent that it puts not just the people in danger but also the people who are short-sightedly pursuing this agenda and worst of all, it is a huge threat to national survival. This is where I am deeply worried. 

    When a nation therefore allows any of the arms to be undermined in anyway, it heavily compromises the entire framework and endangers the nation. It stifles the ability of the system to self-regulate, correcting, adjusting and progressing. It allows the nation to gather clogs, remove fresh breathe and then putrefy and if left unchallenged goes into extinction. We therefore see any society that walks this path as a nation bent on committing hara-kiri. 

    Throughout the history of governance in Nigeria, the Legislature has always been the most abused, bastardised and traumatised despite its well documented contributions to our dear nation. It is the oldest arm of independent government in Nigeria as it was the first arm to attain full “Nigerianship” before the Judiciary and the Executive arms came through in October 1st 1960. One of the problems of our Democracy could therefore easily be situated in the disregard, marginalisation and abuse of one of our most experienced arm of Government in terms of origin.  

    We believe that for Nigeria to move forward, it has to seek a return to the traditions of democracy and tap into the experience and benefits of the Legislature. Until the Legislative arm is respected and fully given space to operate freely as an equal partner in our democratic journey, Nigeria will unfortunately remain in the doldrums of development.

    A brief look at our history will suggest this continuous abnegation of the hallowed assembly of the people. After the first military coup, the Legislature was disbanded, but the other arms of government remained and were transformed in a new way. 

    This was replicated throughout our sojourn in the wilderness of military hegemony. Unfortunately, with the advent of democracy and the return of the Legislature, various leaders in the Executive arms have had to seek ways to capture or hijack the legislature so as to undermine its effectiveness and reduce it to a mere rubber stamp.

    This historical struggle and abuse has contributed in the demise of our democracy and stifled the potency of our governance arrangements. It has led to wastage of resources and the dispensing of energies into pursuing shadows instead of the core substance of governance. 

    The unfortunate Ghana must go displays, the unfortunate paddings and the several struggles in the NASS and the various state houses of Assemblies were all attempt at compromising the Legislature with the single objective of muzzling and determining its various outcomes. 

    The legislature remains the arm of government closest to the people thus is easily congruent and deeply consanguine with the feelings, desires and desires of the masses. Its marginalisation and subjugation is therefore a subjugation of the will of the masses; an alienation of the people and a total disdain of the sovereign power of the people exercised through the Legislature.

    It is through the Legislature that the people are given a critical voice during the life of a government . It is through them that millions of voices are articulated and desires are expressed and met while the various feelings of the masses are given vent. The Legislature is clearly critical to the success of any democracy as it becomes the major plank through which the people hold the Executive to account for their activities during their tenure. 

    We believe that the time has come for all lovers of democracy and indeed every Nigerian who still believe in democratic governance to stand up in support of upholding the principles of democracy. It is our civic responsibility to protect and entrench democratic culture in our nation. Where the Legislature is allowed to operate unhindered; the full benefits of democracy are activated; the masses, Nigeria and even the political class become beneficiaries in the long run.

    Our collective outrage should be expressed against any other arm of Government that tries to hijack the Legislature in whatever guise. We must collectively hold such attempts with disdain and contempt rejecting it as an abhorrent practice that does the nation no good. When we keep quiet in the face of this continued marginalisation of the Legislature, we become unwitting collaborators with those who are bent on making a mockery of democracy including those whose desires are the continued undermining of the sovereign power and expressions of the people. 

    Nigerians must realise that the battle to free the Legislature is tied to our collective battle for good and effective governance. it is tied to our collective battle to stamp out corruption and free greater resources of the nation to serve the interests of the majority of Nigerians. 

    We must all come together as a nation across the various geographic expressions to restore the freedom of the Legislature frowning at Governors or Presidents that undermine the nation through the continuous undermining of the powers of the Legislature. Steal the power of the Legislature, steal the sovereign power of the people should be noted and creatively engaged. It is our moral, civic and collective responsibility. Time to save our democracy is now.

    *Honourable Olumuyiwa Jimoh, former  Deputy Majority Leader and member of the Lagos state House of Assembly representing Apapa II constituency.

  • ‘Governors must treat legislature as partners’

    ‘Governors must treat legislature as partners’

    Lagos State House of Assembly has called on governors to treat lawmakers as partners in progress and development of states and not as appendages.

    The House called on the National Assembly to criminalise any action that violates the independence of the parliament.

    It passed the resolutions yesterday in commemoration of the 2024 edition of the International Day of Parliamentarism celebrated on June 30.

    The Assembly urged Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu to recognise past speakers of the Lagos Assembly for their contributions to the state’s growth and development.

    Read Also: Obasanjo parleys Southeast Govs on Nnamdi Kanu

    Speaker Mudashiru Obasa emphasised the significance of honouring past speakers, who have served and contributed to the development of the state.

    He said without the parliament, there is no democracy, highlighting the institution’s crucial role in governance through lawmaking, motions and resolutions.

    Obasa described the International Day of Parliamentarism as a day to “do more to draw the attention of Nigerians to the importance of the legislature.”

  • Nigeria should try unicameral legislature, says senator

    Nigeria should try unicameral legislature, says senator

    The senator representing Oyo North, Dr. Fatai Buhari, has said Nigeria should try unicameral legislature, to reduce the cost of running the presidential system of government.

    He made the call while featuring on Southwest Political Circuit, an interview programme on Ibadan-based Fresh FM 105.9.

    He said trying unicameral legislature could help reduce cost, adding that his experience serving at both chambers of the National Assembly showed that both houses could be combined with reduced number of lawmakers.

    Read Also; New York Times’ jaundiced report on Nigeria’s economy

    The lawmaker served as a member of House of Representatives from 1999-2003, and is currently serving his third term at the Senate.

    When asked of his opinion on the cost of running both arms of the National Assembly, Buhari said there is nothing wrong with unicameral legislature, reminding Nigerians that it has been practised before.

    He said it is possible for a one-arm National Assembly to handle the lawmaking process and still offer good representation for the constituencies.

  • Govt agencies urged to cooperate with legislature on oversight

    Govt agencies urged to cooperate with legislature on oversight

    The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt Hon Tajudeen Abbas, has called on all agencies of government to support and cooperate with the legislature in the task of its oversight function.

    This, the Speaker said, is because it is through this collaboration that the drive for economic growth, transparency and accountability can be achieved.

    Abbas said this at the opening of a one-day public hearing by the House Committee on Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring in Abuja on Thursday.

    The Speaker was represented by the Deputy Minority Whip, Hon Ozodinobi George, at the public hearing, which was on two Bills.

    They are “A Bill for an Act to Enact the Nigerian Content (Non-Oil and Gas Sector) Development (Establishment) Bill to establish the Nigerian Content Council and to Provide for Programme Structure for the use of Nigerian Expertise, Made- in- Nigeria Goods and Services, Economic Diversification; and for Related Matters (HB. 59)” and “A Bill for an Act to Repeal the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Act No. 2, 2010 and to Enact the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Act to establish the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board and to Provide for Legal Framework, Structures and Programmes for the Strengthening of the Nigerian Content in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry and for Related Matters (HB. 1039)”

    Both Bills passed through Second Reading in the House on Thursday, 2nd November, 2023, and Wednesday, 31st January, 2024, respectively and were referred to the Committee for further legislative action.

    Abbas said the active participation of relevant stakeholders ,experts and civil society groups to air their views during the hearing ,would not only determine the acceptability or otherwise of the Bill proposed for repeal of existing law or establishment of a new law, but will enable them to be actively involved in the law making processes.

    Read Also; Tinubu’s economic reforms yielding results, says Alake

    He said it was also expected that at the end of the exercise, the various observations or suggestions offered by stakeholders will assist the Committee in arriving at its recommendations for the benefit of both the non-oil and the oil and gas sectors and also for the entire nation.

    He said, “The Non-oil and gas (establishment) Bill (HB. 59), seeks to ensure the diversification of Nigerian economy through the application of Nigerian Content principles to transactions in the non-oil and gas sector.

    “This involves the development of domestic capacities and capabilities in the value chain of some critical sectors like ICT, Mining, Power, Maritime, Manufacturing, Health, Agriculture etc., in the Nigerian economy through strategic investments, education, skills transfer, expertise development, transfer of technology know-how and active research development programmes.

    “The Bill (HB.1039), repealing the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development (NOGICD) Act, 2010, provides a comprehensive and all-inclusive provisions for Nigerian Content Development in the oil and gas sector of the Nigerian economy. The provisions of the Bill are to be applicable to only the Oil and Gas Sector of the Nigerian economy.

    “This Bill therefore seeks to repeal the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Act, No. 2, 2010, and enact the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Act.

    “The Act has been implemented for thirteen years but an objective examination of its provisions will show that there are very fundamental defects in the Act such that some critical provisions of the Act are so vaguely worded with wide discretionary administrative powers, especially on waivers, which has the propensity to aid abuse of power.

    “Another fundamental defect in the extant Act is that the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act 2010 is bereft of any provision for strong oversight, thereby giving free hand to whoever cares.

    “The establishment and running of the Board will not be expected to place any financial burden on the Federal Government, rather Government will derive revenue from the creation of the Board in addition to improving Nigeria’s capacities in the oil and gas sector with the attendant employment opportunities for Nigerians, international competitiveness of Nigerian businesses, increased in-Country spending, increased in-skill transfer among others.”

    He said if these Bills are passed into law and implemented, Nigeria will benefit tremendously.

    He added that the following benefits among others will be achieved.

    They include the ultimate industrialization of the Oil and Gas Industry with the attendant benefits from the implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA); and the achievement and maintenance of control over the economic developmental initiatives and activities in Nigeria.

    Others are strengthening of the international competitiveness of Nigerian domestic businesses; saving foreign currency to increase the national foreign reserve; and the creation of massive employment opportunities from the value chain of the input of supplier to selling of the products to the final consumers in the Non-Oil and Oil and Gas industry.

    He added that export of surplus petroleum products would earn foreign income and further strengthen the national currency; increase in foreign Direct Investment; aggressive technological innovations through research and development programmes and transfer of technology; greater in- country spend; and exports of technical skills to other countries.

    “In this regard, let me assure you that we would continue to do our best in carrying out our mandate as the law making body of governance and urge you to support our cause. We are equally always available to support you on any genuine cause to give appropriate legislation to any legitimate cause that will promote national development.

    “Consequently, this Committee is expected to do a thorough job on the Bills and come up with workable and acceptable recommendations which would serve the purpose of the essence of this Bill, for the benefit of the country,” he said.

    Chairman of the Committee, Hon Boma Goodhead, said the two very significant Bills that hold the key to our nation’s progress.

    The lawmaker said the principal purpose of the public hearing was not just to hear but to truly consider and value the views of stakeholders and the general public before reporting to the House.

    She briefly outlined the jurisdiction of the Committee as enshrined in the House of Representatives Standing Order 18 Rule 94 as follows.

    Goodhead said they included Matters relating to local skill development; Ensuring the transfer of technology in the oil and gas industry; Ensuring the patronage of local manpower by any industry sited in Nigeria; and Designing policies that would ensure the patronage of local manufacturing industries by Nigerians.

    Others are Receiving an annual performance report of the Nigerian Local Content; Oversight of the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board; and Annual budget estimates.

    She said, “As you know and appreciate, lawmaking is one of the primary and constitutional mandates of the National Assembly. Hence, the event we are witnessing today is one of such routine legislative processes and practices. Bills are proposed to amend, repeal, or enact an existing Act or establish an entirely new law.

    “In the circumstances of our present experiences in the implementation of Nigerian Content policies, it is obvious that there is a compelling need to repeal and enact the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act (NOGICD), 2010, and also to establish structures, plans and programs for Nigerian Content development and monitoring in the non –oil and gas sector in the Nigerian economy to replicate and even surpass the successes achieved in the Nigerian Content development in the oil and gas sector, in the non-oil and gas sector of the economy.

    “These Bills are undoubtedly extremely critical to the development and strengthening of the Nigerian Content in both the Oil and gas and Non-Oil and Gas Sectors, especially in the growth of Nigerian industries, creation of massive employment opportunities for Nigerians, and export of surplus Made–in–Nigeria products to earn foreign income and further strengthen the national currency.

    “I fervently hope that with the qualities of the personalities, especially knowledgeable and well-experienced professionals gathered here today, the best ideas will be brought out to help the various sectors these bills relate to. This Committee believes that the provisions in these Bills are still mere suggestions until they are enacted as an Act of the National Assembly. The provisions are, therefore, not stone cast and un-amendable

    “I assure you that the Committee is always ready to accept and adopt useful ideas to ensure equitable utilization of our resources to benefit all stakeholders in the various industries.

    “On this note, I wish to assure you further that as legislators and Members of the Committee, we are conscious of our constitutional responsibilities and shall give the necessary legislative support and cooperation required for the passage of these Bills into an Act of the National Assembly in no distant time, God willing. “

  • Need for a unicameral legislature

    Need for a unicameral legislature

    • By Frank Ojeme Anyasi

    Many a time one wonders whether Nigeria really needs a bicameral legislature at this point in time when the country is contending with enormous socio-economic challenges. The inflation rate which is 27.33 percent is at an all-time high. The consequences are that poverty is ravaging the land. Families that were hitherto categorized as middle-income earners have descended to low-income earners while those who were low-income earners have gone down to become the poorest of the poor. The insecurity has distorted the food supply chain and contributed to food inflation. The decline in oil production has further negatively affected the plan for diversification of the economy.

    What was in vogue before the adoption of legislature as a platform of citizens representation was direct democracy. It is a type of democracy that allows the people themselves, rather than the elected representatives, to make the laws and policies by which they are governed. This was later replaced by what is known as representative democracy. This is because, direct democracy was difficult if not impossible to operate because of the size and huge financial outlay involved. Representative democracy therefore, evolved as the only workable system. It is a form of indirect democracy which guarantees the citizens the opportunity to choose those who will represent them in government.

    In Nigeria, bicameral legislature is being practiced to ensure adequate representation of ethnic groups that make up the country. In reality, however, the adoption of bicameralism as a system of legislature has somewhat proved to be detrimental to rather than deepening democracy. The supposed gains of bicameralism have been lost in the huge financial outlay required to maintain and sustain its operation. The huge resources, it appears have not been justified by the promotion of personal interest over national interest and citizens well-being.

    One may say that bicameral legislature provides a more robust legislative system, because it protects the interests of minority groups. It also makes it possible for public opinion to be properly expressed on the issues concerned before bills are passed. As is often said, two good heads are better than one. Unlike unicameral legislature, two houses carefully review any proposed law before it is passed to law in a bicameral legislature. There is more opportunity for bills to be debated and discussed in detail. The upper house acts as a safeguard against hasty or misguided legislation passed by the lower house. Another benefit of a bicameral legislature is that it places an additional check on the power of the executive.

    Since both chambers perform the same functions, it can easily lead to unnecessary overlap and waste of resources. Large amount of public funds are required to maintain a bicameral legislature and this places additional burden on tax payers, which is not feasible for less developed countries like Nigeria. The resources required to run a bicameral legislature can be deployed for the development of the economy and improvement of the well-being of the citizens.

    Read Also: Legislature, judiciary autonomy bills ready for Buhari’s assent

    Despite the economic crisis ravaging the country due to the removal of petrol subsidy and the devaluation of the naira, National Assembly is contemplating purchasing imported 469 Toyota land cruiser for the official use of the members at the cost of N160 million per vehicle. According to the parliamentarians, the vehicles will enable them wade through the bad roads to perform their oversight functions. The question that comes to mind is whose responsibility is it to ensure that the roads are properly maintained. Why should the ordinary man pay for the failure of the National Assembly to perform their oversight functions? The funds earmarked for the purchase of these vehicles could be used to improve public infrastructures in the public universities. Studies have shown that every country that transitioned from backwardness to developed economy has had to invest massively in its university system. For example, Singapore’s transition from third world to a first world country was enabled by its investment in its university education. Countries that downplay higher education suffer stagnation and retrogression.

    Moreover, it is not fair for National Assembly to decide to import the vehicles from Toyota Company when there are local car manufacturing companies that can produce similar cars for them. Purchase of locally manufactured cars will boost the economy. It will build human capacity and increase the utilization of local content.

    The priority of lawmakers should be to make good laws that will redeem the citizens from misery and deprivation and not the purchase of luxury official vehicles. This financial profligacy has stunted our growth as a country. They should ask their conscience if the cost of the vehicles is conscionable. There appears to be different worlds between the political elites and the people. The economic squeeze is terrific, yet our legislators’ fiddle while the citizens are languishing in poverty. We need a country where nobody will be so poor to sell himself to live or where someone will be too rich to buy others.

    The ordinary man is often persuaded to tighten his belt and make sacrifice but the political elites are losing their belts because of their consumptive culture. He that comes to equity must come with clean hands. According to John Wesley, do all the good you can, in all the means you can, at all the times you can, with all the zeal you can, as long as you can.

    I believe that a unicameral legislature will serve the needs of Nigeria in terms of savings. Some countries like Greece and New Zealand switched from bicameral to unicameral legislature. That did not make these countries less democratic. I have not observed any development attached to bicameral legislature. In fact, the way it is going in Nigeria will lead us nowhere. Therefore, unicameral legislature is the way to go. For example, Ghana practices unicameral legislature and it is doing well. Emphasis should be shifted from fulltime membership of National Assembly to service oriented legislators who are paid sitting allowances. The problem is that there is need for constitutional amendment to unicameral legislature and this may be difficult because the parliamentarians who are to amend the constitution are the beneficiaries of bicameral legislature. But where there is a will there is a way.

  • For the abolition of our predatory legislature (2)

    With or without the legislators’ involvement, we must abolish our present predatory legislature. This was the closing declaration of last week’s beginning piece in this series. It will be our main topic in this week’s continuation of the series. But first, as promised at least twice in the course of last week’s discussion, we need to give a fuller explanation of the contention that our predatory legislature is the heart and soul, as well as the center of gravity of all the looting of our collective wealth and national assets, all the plunder, wastage and squandermania that characterize the running of governmental affairs in our country at the local, state and federal levels. Indeed, the tentacles of predation and exploitation of and from our legislature reach out so far and wide as to include the Judiciary (Bar and Bench), the Police, the Armed Forces and the other security services, as well as the religious estates of churches, mosques and synagogues. Is this not an exaggeration, this claim that wherever you find looting and corruption in the public affairs of this country, its ultimate foundation is the legalized and institutionalized looting in and by our predatory legislature? No, it is not an exaggeration, compatriots!

    To establish the veracity of this claim, we have to bear three things in mind. The first is the often-forgotten fact that the humungous remuneration of our legislators did not exist before 1999, the year of the inauguration of the present 4th Republic that restored civilian democratic rule. This is to say that prior to 1999 and the restoration of “democracy” after the long interregnum of military dictatorships, what our legislators received as salaries and remunerations in the two previous republics of civilian rule were not exceptional; they were not out of tune with the pay packages of parliamentarians in the rest of Africa and the world – as they are now, beginning in 1999. Secondly, the outsize pay package was copied from traditions and practices of the Congress of the United States of America as part of the wholesale adoption of the American presidential system to replace the Westminster model that had been in force during periods of civilian democratic rule in our country. But note that what we copied from the Americans did not come with the strict regulation that governs how much American legislators can claim and how they are to spend and account for what they claim. In our case, and starting in 1999, what Nigerian legislators claim as salaries and allowances can only be regulated by the legislators themselves – which effectively means no regulation at all.

    This leads us to the third and perhaps the most important thing to bear in mind as we approach the crucial subject of the centrality of our predatory legislature to the miasma of corruption, waste and squandermania in the current political order that we know as the 4th Republic. What is this thing? It is the sheer scope or size or nature of the pay packages of our lawgivers. The figures are disputed, but even the lowest figure given by some legislators themselves – around N15 million naira per month for each legislator – is the highest in the world. The highest figure, calculated by none other than Professor Itse Sagay – N29 million per month – is the highest in the history of modern parliaments. Even Olusegun Obasanjo, the man under whose presidency the bonanza began, has called it nothing short of “unarmed robbery”. And in July 2013, The Economist, one of the most influential economic newsmagazines in the world, ranked Nigeria as the country with the most unjust and lopsided pay structure in the world, based mainly on what our lawmakers pay themselves as salaries and allowances. Measured in terms of earnings per capita GDP, the British magazine calculated our lawgivers’ pay packages to be 116 times the per capita GDP of the average Nigerian. Indeed, it is instructive to recall here the comparative figures given by the newsmagazine for other countries in relation to Nigeria’s 116 per capita GDP: Kenya, 76; Ghana, 29; South Africa, 14.5; Brazil, 13; India, 7.5; Italy, 5; Bangladesh, 4.5 Finally, some civil society organizations have calculated that though our legislators and the staff of the National Assembly number less than 10,000, they receive annual salaries that are together  bigger than the budget of 21 out of the 36 states of the federation. To cap it all, our legislators’ pay packages are placed under a special category of expenditure known as “statutory transfer” which makes it mandatory for the federal government, after receiving any revenues, to immediately make transfers to the account of the National Assembly before other considerations.

    Dear compatriots, if you are curious about where I got all these facts, figures and statistics from, please know that the question is unnecessary, almost to the point of being redundant. Why so? Well, because the scandal of Nigerian lawmakers’ salaries and allowances is a topic that has attracted considerable interest around the world. If you spend one hour on the subject on the Internet, one hour only, you will be amazed at how much material you will get. And indeed, I must state very clearly here that, with regard to the subject, I am by no means a lone voice crying in the wilderness. One group, #OpenNASS, is worthy of mention and praise for the persistence and diligence with which it has gone after this mega-scandal of our predatory legislature. The only quarrel I have with the organization and others like it is the fact that they see the problem as one of making our legislature more transparent and accountable when, to me, it is as clear as daylight that what is needed is far beyond asking for transparency and accountability; it is the abolition of the legislature itself in its present form. The strongest case for this is the centrality of this predatory legislative order to the scale of predation and exploitation in our barawo democracy.

    Corruption on a mega scale, in both the public and private spheres of affairs in our country, did not start in Nigeria in 1999 with the inauguration of the 4th Republic. Corruption had become lord and master in the land in the years and decades of military dictatorship, reaching its zenith under the presidencies of Sani Abacha and Abdulsalami Abubakar. What happened in 1999 in the new and hitherto humungous pay packages of our legislators was the institutionalization of corruption on a mega scale as completely legal and unchallengeable in the law courts of the land. To see this clearly, compatriots, you must see the difference between income and wealth. Most men and women, the old and the young never, never get wealthy from incomes. And this has been true in the past as it is true in the present. And it is as true in capitalist economies as in non-capitalist or socialist economies. Indeed, you could say that income is as different from wealth as working hard to survive is to winning a lottery: most people will, in their lifetimes experience the former while only a fraction of the human race will ever experience the latter. With the exception of legislators of the Nigerian 4th Republic.

    With the inauguration of the 1st National Assembly of the 4th Republic in 1999, the normative, age-old difference or distance between income and wealth was abolished. If you so prefer, compatriots, you could say that the difference was collapsed. If you are receiving N15 million or N29 million a month, your income will become wealth in less than a year. And since you’re elected for four years for every cycle of the legislature, you would have become a very wealthy woman or man even if you served for only one electoral cycle. Please, note that this is all perfectly legal, even if it is also abysmally unjust and exploitative in a very poor country whose economy is yet to be transformed into a middle-income economy – in spite of the immense oil wealth. As much as this is crucial to grasp and hold on to as a fundamental aspect of the centrality of our predatory legislature, what is even more important to grasp is the fact that the legalization of greed and sleaze on such a grandiose scale made possible an impunity, an immensity of looting and thievery in our country that is almost unique in the democracies of the world. As we all know, the criminal justice system in Nigeria, starting from around 1999, has been unmatched by any other country in the world in how politicians and public officeholders can walk free without successful prosecution and return of their stolen loot. In case the logic of my argument here is not clear enough, permit me to make it clearer: if you want to know why looting and thievery became so pervasive in the 4th Republic, you must pay attention to why the legalization and institutionalization of greed and sleaze in our predatory legislature fatally corrupted the criminal justice system in our country, starting from around 1999.

    Is it any wonder that on top of their humungous salaries and allowances, we still read and hear of illegal and unconscionable acts of colossal thievery by our legislators like “budget padding”, contract scandals and bribes from lobbyists? Many legislators have been caught red-handed but have gone scot-free. Nigerians ask themselves, helplessly, why the most overpaid legislators in the world still feel driven to steal and loot on a such a massive scale. Why, why and why? Because with the abolition of the distance between income and wealth, the doors opened wide for unlimited and unregulatable looting and thievery. And the lawyers, the magistrates, the judges followed suit. As did the prelates of the churches, mosques and synagogues. Franchises, all of them, with a few exceptions. Almost all connected to the banks and the financial services industry. And all, all of them connected to the global capitalist pool whose centers are in Europe, North America and the resurgent Far East.

    In all the foregoing, I have concentrated on the broad picture, on the formal features. But at the end of the day, the real significance is measurable in the concrete, searing terms of human  suffering and insecurity, the like of which members of my generational cohort had never seen anywhere in our country in the years and decades of our youth to our early to mid-life adulthood. Truly, I ought to devote an entire column to the cost in human terms of the centrality of our predatory legislature to the scale of poverty, want, joblessness and insecurity in the lives of the majority of Nigerians at the present time. That being impossible in the present discussion, permit me to say only this: our country has become one of the most challenging countries in the world to be born into, to live in and, mirabile dictu, to die.

    But this is not to end with despair, with a jeremiad of complaints and protestations. When you are calling for the abolition of some terribly unjust and unregenerate state policies, actions and, indeed, a way of life, the last thing you want to do is lapse into a dolorous or defeatist discourse. As a matter of fact, the main impulse for this series came from my sense of the defeatism in addressing complaints and protests about our legislators’ pay packets to the legislators themselves in the hope that we can either convince them or, shame them, into doing what is right, what is in the interest and for the good of the majority of our peoples everywhere in the land. My contention in the discussion has been that this is strategically unwise and ill-advised. I had thought that I would get to this concluding issue this week. Clearly, that is not possible in the space left for this week’s column. For this reason, this will be our starting point in next week’s concluding piece in the series. For now, permit me to end with the following hint of what I will be arguing next week. What is it? This is it: we can and should tactically call and work for reform from within the predatory legislature itself; however, strategically we should work outside the legislature through a comprehensive, non-violent movement for the abolition of the current legislative order. With or without our legislators’ involvement; and without a military coup, thank you very much.

     

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • Buhari inaugurates panel on state legislature, judiciary autonomy

    President Muhammadu Buhari yesterday inaugurated the Presidential Implementation Committee on Autonomy of the State Legislature and State Judiciary at the State House, Abuja.

    The inauguration, according to the President, was in line with the 4th alteration to the 1999 Constitution.

    The President disclosed that the 16-man committee is to be chaired by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, while the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Ita Enang, will serve as Secretary.

    The President urged the committee to be meticulous and diligent in carrying out the assignment.

    When the implementation is done, the President said that it will ensure proper checks and balances.

    He gave the committee three months to complete the assignment.

    He said: “The setting up of this committee is necessitated by the realization that legislative and judicial autonomy are necessary pre-conditions for our democracy to endure.

    “We are committed to strengthening our democracy by ensuring separation of powers among the three arms of Nigerian government, even at the state levels. Furthermore, we have identified the need to sustain our constitutionally guaranteed federal system of government by building capabilities not only at the federal level but at all the federating units.

    “This committee has, therefore, been set up, as a major reform of this administration to ensure that the autonomy granted to the legislature and judiciary at the state levels is maintained, pursuant to Section 161 of the 4th Alteration to the 1999 Constitution (As Amended).

    “The committee is thus expected to foster effective implementation of the autonomy constitutionally granted the state legislature and judiciary under the 1999 Constitution (as amended).  It is my hope that when this is done, there will be proper checks and balances, and the state legislature and judiciary shall be genuinely empowered to carry out their respective constitutional duties without fear of dominance and or marginalization.

    “The legislature, being the closest arm of government to the people, and the judiciary as the last hope of the common man, must both be seen to be sufficiently independent to perform their respective constitutional roles without any interference, let or hindrance.  In this regard, ensuring that these organs of government enjoy financial autonomy will further enhance their efficiency and independence.”

    In executing the national assignment, he said that the committee is expected to co-operate with all relevant stakeholders to ensure compliance with the constitutional provisions granting autonomy to state legislature and judiciary without deviating from its approved terms of reference.

  • Buhari inaugurates panel on autonomy of state legislature, judiciary

    President Muhammadu Buhari yesterday inaugurated the Presidential Implementation Committee on Autonomy of the State Legislature and State Judiciary at the State House, Abuja.

    The inauguration of the committee, according to the President, was in line with the 4th alteration to the 1999 Constitution.

    The President disclosed that the 16-man committee is to be chaired by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, while the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Ita Enang, will serve as Secretary.

    The President urged the committee to be meticulous and diligent in carrying out the assignment.

    The implementation of the committee’s assignment, the President said, will ensure proper checks and balances.

    He gave the committee three months to complete the assignment.

    He said: “The setting up of this Committee is necessitated by the realization that legislative and judicial autonomy are necessary pre-conditions for our democracy to endure.

    “We are committed to strengthening our democracy by ensuring separation of powers among the three arms of Nigerian government, even at the state levels.

    “Furthermore, we have identified the need to sustain our constitutionally guaranteed federal system of government by building capabilities, not only at the federal level, but at all the federating units.

    “This committee has therefore been set up as a major reform of this administration, to ensure that the autonomy granted to the legislature and judiciary at state levels is maintained, pursuant to Section 161 of the 4th Alteration to the 1999 Constitution (As Amended).

    “The Committee is thus expected to foster effective implementation of the autonomy constitutionally granted the state legislature and judiciary under the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    “It is my hope that when this is done, there will be proper checks and balances, and the state legislature and judiciary shall be genuinely empowered to carry out their respective Constitutional duties without fear of dominance and or marginalization.

    “The Legislature, being the closest arm of government to the people, and the Judiciary as the last hope of the common man, must both be seen to be sufficiently independent to perform their respective constitutional roles without any interference, let or hindrance.

    “In this regard, ensuring that these organs of government enjoy financial autonomy will further enhance their efficiency and independence.”

    In executing the national assignment, he said that the Committee is expected to cooperate with all relevant stakeholders to ensure compliance with the constitutional provisions granting autonomy to state legislature and judiciary, without deviating from its approved terms of reference.

    The terms of reference, he said, included:

    “a) To assess and review the level of compliance by all the 36 States of the Federation and the FCT with Section 121(3) of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended);

    “b) To monitor, ensure and cause the implementation of financial autonomy across the judiciary and legislature of the 36 states of the federation and the FCT in accordance with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended) and other applicable Laws, Instruments, Regulations, and Conventions howsoever providing for financial autonomy for the Legislature and Judiciary at the State tier of Government;

    “c) To consult and relate with the appropriate Federal and State MDAs, including but not limited to the Governors Forum, Accountant General of the Federation and those of the States, the National Economic Council and other institutions of State to ensure and, where necessary, enforce the implementation of Constitutional provisions;

    “d) To come up with appropriate modalities or model to be adopted by all the States of the Federation for implementation and/or compliance with Section 121(3) of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended);

    “e) To advise on other measures that are deemed necessary or incidental to the fulfilment of the aims of the Committee to attain the full purport of this assignment.”

  • Buhari inaugurates panel on State Legislature, Judiciary Autonomy

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Friday inaugurated the Presidential Implementation Committee on Autonomy of the State Legislature and State Judiciary at the State House, Abuja.

    The inauguration, according to the President, was in line with the 4th alteration to the 1999 Constitution.

    The President disclosed that the 16-man committee is to be chaired by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami while the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly matters (Senate), Ita Enang will serve as Secretary.

    Read Also: Buhari lists transparency, inclusiveness as policy thrust in next four years

    The President urged the committee to be meticulous and diligent in carrying out the assignment.

    When the implementation is done, the President said that it will ensure proper checks and balances without fear or marginalisation.

    He gave the committee three months to complete the assignment.

  • Monarch seeks cooperation between executive, legislature

    The king of Egbe land, His Royal Majesty Oba Ashimiyu Lasisi the Dada Otta Kudaki Obalufon I, has called for synergy between the legislative and executive arms of government.

    He said it would end disunity between the two arms of government.

    The traditional ruler made the remark when the legislative arm of Egbe-Idimu Local Council Development Area (LCDA) visited him in his palace.

    Lasisi, who was the pioneer executive chairman of the council, said there must be cordial relationship among the legislature and executives.

    He said: “Legislators are the people’s mouthpiece while the executives are the executors of people’s needs. Whatever the legislators want is what the executive should work on not that the executive will impose its opinions on the legislators and indirectly to the people.

    “At local government level, the Executive Chairman has to carry the councilors along in every decision making, councilors are representatives of their wards and they shouldn’t be taking for granted. They are the political mobilisers, they are closer to the people than the chairman, so they just have to be carrying along.”

    The former council boss advised the councilors to always support the  chairman in fulfilling his campaign promises.

    The leader of the Legislative arm, Hon. Taiwo Lasisi, said the visit was to seek advice and partnership.

    “This visit is part of our annual overnight functions, we intend to seek advices from our royal fathers, seek partnership with company’s major stakeholders within our locality and also inspect all completed and ongoing projects carried out by our council,” he said.