Tag: LGBT

  • Italy prohibits couples from travelling abroad for surrogacy

    Italy prohibits couples from travelling abroad for surrogacy


    Italy has made it illegal for couples to travel abroad for surrogacy. 

    This new law expands an existing ban on surrogacy within the country to include those seeking it in legal jurisdictions like the US and Canada. 

    Violators could face up to two years in prison and fines reaching €1 million (£835,710).

    Critics of the law, proposed by Italy’s far-right governing party, argue that it disproportionately affects LGBT couples, who are already prohibited from adopting or using IVF in Italy.

    Surrogacy involves a woman carrying a pregnancy for another individual or couple, often due to fertility challenges or in cases involving same-sex male couples.

    The law was approved by a vote of 84 to 58 in Italy’s Senate on Wednesday.

    Ahead of the vote, opponents staged a protest, arguing that the legislation complicates the path to parenthood, even as the country’s birth rate continues to decline.

    “If someone has a baby they should be given a medal”, LGBT activist Franco Grillini told the Reuters news agency at the demonstration.

    “Here instead you are sent to jail… if you don’t have children in the traditional way.

    “This is a monstrous law. No country in the world has such a thing.”

    The move aligns with the socially conservative agenda of Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s first female prime minister and leader of the Brothers of Italy party. She has identified as a Christian mother and advocates for children to be raised by a man and a woman.

    Read Also: Starmer looks to Italy on how to stop migrant boats

    Meloni has publicly opposed surrogacy for LGBT couples, and anti-LGBT rhetoric played a significant role in her election campaign. In a 2022 speech, she stated, “Yes to the natural family, no to the LGBT lobby.”

    In 2023, her government directed Milan’s city council to cease the registration of children with same-sex parents.

    Meloni has referred to surrogacy as “a symbol of an abominable society that confuses desire with rights and substitutes God with money.”

    Her deputy, Matteo Salvini, has labeled the practice an “aberration,” asserting that it reduces women to the status of an “ATM.”

    Carolina Varchi, the MP who drafted Wednesday’s ban, previously stated that it was not intended to harm LGBT individuals, arguing that “most people who use surrogacy are heterosexual.” She emphasized that the law would “protect women and their dignity.”

  • FULL LIST: African countries with laws against LGBT

    FULL LIST: African countries with laws against LGBT

    Homosexual rights in Africa differ significantly from those in America, Western Europe, and many other parts of the world.

    Out of the 54 states recognised by the African Union (AU), twenty-eight criminalise homosexuality, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment.

    Here are the African countries and their penalties for homosexuality:

    1. Mauritania – Death Penalty

    2. Senegal – Up to five years in prison

    3. Gambia – Life in prison

    4. Guinea – Three years in prison

    5. Sierra Leone – Life in prison

    6. Liberia – One year in prison or a fine of up to L$1000

    7. Ghana – Three years in prison

    8. Togo – Three years in prison

    9. Morocco – Three years in prison

    10. Algeria – Three years in prison

    11. Tunisia – Three years in prison

    12. Libya – Five years in prison

    13. Chad – Two years in prison

    Read Also: SAMOA agreement had no provision for LGBT, gay rights – NBA President

    14. Nigeria – Up to 14 years in prison

    15. Cameroon – Five years in prison

    16. Egypt – Three years in prison and a fine of 100 to 300 Egyptian pounds per charge

    17. Sudan – Life in prison

    18. Eritrea – Up to seven years

    19. South Sudan – Ten years

    20. Ethiopia – 15 years

    21. Somalia – Death penalty

    22. Uganda – Death penalty

    23. Kenya – 14 years

    24. Burundi – Two years

    25. Tanzania – Life in prison

    26. Zambia – Life in prison

    27. Malawi – 14 years

    28. Zimbabwe – One year and a fine

  • Samoa Agreement: No clause on LGBT, $150b for  Nigeria – Bagudu

    Samoa Agreement: No clause on LGBT, $150b for  Nigeria – Bagudu

    • FG releases details, insists pact won’t hurt Nigeria
    • Disregard fake news about agreement, govt tells clerics
    • Ex-British Diplomat: Reports linking deal to LGBT rights irresponsible

    The Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Senator Abubakar Bagudu, yesterday said there was no clause on $150 billion for Nigeria in Samoa Agreement.

    He said what Nigeria signed was the “Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Members States and members of the Organization of the Caribbean and Pacific States”.

    He denied that the agreement had anything to do with the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) rights.

    He said Nigeria’s signing of the agreement was accompanied by a declaration clarifying its understanding of it.

    He said the agreement Nigeria entered into contained 103 foundational articles and 79 African region specific protocols.

    He said “none of the protocols offends our laws.”

    He said the agreement has no clause on LGBTQ+ rights or any agreement indicating that Nigeria support LGBTQ rights.  He said: “Anything we sign must be in tandem with our constitution and laws. Anything beyond that is null and void.

    “Tinubu respects Nigeria’s sensitivity and diversity and will never approve anything that will be seen as damaging our sensitivity.”

    Bagudu spoke at an emergency press briefing on Abuja in the company of the Minister of information and Orientation, Mohammed Idris, and the Special Assistant to the President on Information and Strategy, Mr. Bayo Onanuga.

    FG threatens to drag Daily Trust to Ombudsman, court

    Taking the first shot, the Minister of information and Orientation described as fake news and disinformation the report that the government has signed the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) agreement in exchange for $150 billion, saying the government would consider legal actions against the media House.

    He said the agreement has no provision for LGBT in whatever form, adding that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu will never sign any agreement that is against the country’s constitution, law, culture and religion.

    He said the government would drag Daily Trust newspaper to an Ombudsman and the court to prove that it misled Nigerians on the agreement.

    Idris advised some clerics already inciting Muslims in the country against being misdirected by fake news.

    He said contrary to what was reported, there is nothing in the agreement that is of concern.

    Idris said that following the report in the national daily, Ulamas started to use it in their Friday sermons to castigate the government.

    The minister cautioned against media publication that continued to advance the erroneous narrative that the Samoa Agreement recently signed by the Federal Government was to promote the LGBT agenda in the country.

    He said the affected media outfit would be dragged before the, Ombudsman of the Newspaper Proprietors of Nigeria (NPAN).

    He, however, assured that the Tinubu administration will not trample on press freedom.

    He said: “We are alarmed by the level of reckless reporting and statements by some media organisations and individuals that border on national security and stability.

    “While we sometimes view and treat those occasional reporting as part of media’s normal work, we have now seen a pattern that is difficult to be wished away as normal journalism.

    “The insidious and inciting publications by Daily Trust these past months have come across as nothing but a deliberate effort to brush the government with a tar.

    “On many occasions we have restrained ourselves from believing that this was the case, but the consistency of the jejune and mischievous publications leaves us with no option.

    “In the aftermath of the coup in Niger Republic, Daily Trust championed a jaundiced narrative that the Federal Government was driving the country into a war and twisted it with regional sentiment to cause disaffection.

    “The same newspaper gave a banner headline to a baseless accusation that the government was working on citing foreign military bases in the country. Neither Daily Trust nor originators of that imaginative allegation provided any shred of evidence.

    “Then just two weeks ago, Daily Trust concocted and popularised a lie that the Federal Government had renamed the Murtala Mohammed Expressway in Abuja to Wole Soyinka Way.

    “In all those instances all that the paper depended on were falsehood and hearsays. They also showed no remorse or the humility to recant.

    “We however did not envisage that Daily Trust and people behind it could descend to the reckless level of attempting to set the country on fire by falsely accusing the government of signing a deal to promote LGBTQ.

    “We found that despicable and wicked because the allegation is nowhere in the document signed. Surprisingly, the paper put forward no evidence nor provided the agreement allegedly signed to prove their point.

    “The baseless and sensational story unfortunately formed a basis for Khutba (sermons) by some of our respected imams who were misled by the story, thereby raising tempers.

    “On the part of the government, we continue on the honourable path of civility by restraining ourselves from taking self-help or draconian measures.

    “While past governments clamped down on the media for infractions much lower than this, we are however toeing the path of civility and the rule of law.

    “But beyond this, the Federal Government is lodging a formal complaint to the NPAN Ombudsman on this irresponsible reporting.

    “In addition, the Federal Government will use every lawful means to seek redress in the court of law.

    “The Federal Government once again restates its friendly policy towards ethical media and free speech. We would however not take fake news and disinformation that would injure the peace of our country and its national security lightly.”

    Idris insisted that the Federal Government has nothing to hide.

    He said the Tinubu administration was committed to Probity and Transparency.

    He added: “The Ministry of Information and National Orientation under my leadership will do everything possible to ensure transparency, honesty in the dissemination of credible information.

    “We made this solemn pledge at the beginning when we were new to office and we will continue to do that.

     “We call on you, members of the media, to please help us to spread only what is correct and what you know you can verify.

    “It is normal and indeed within the right of the media to scrutinise the affairs of government.

    “Nobody can take that away but it is important that care is taken so that when information is being passed, we only present what we know to only the true, credible, honest and in the best interest of our nation.

    “Whenever information is being spread that will harm our unity, that will harm our political existence as a nation, then of course there must be something to be asked there.

    “We will continue to provide information to the media as needed.

    “I would also implore the media to please report only what is factual.

     “The series of headlines we think that we have received from the newspaper has given us a cause for concern.

     “For me, as a member of this industry, I am really particularly pained that I have to come to address a particular medium in this regard.

    “But it is important because we have made this pledge that we are only going to provide what is credible, what we know to be factual.

    “The President and this administration will not in any way, in any way, I repeat, the President will not sign or cause any office official to sign anything that will harm our nation, not in any way.

    “So to all those who come on in that there is a signature out there that gives away our country as an LGBT-compliant country or seeking to do that, it is mischaracterization, misrepresentation.

    “The current government insists that our laws will be respected, our norms will be respected, our traditions will also be respected and our values will be respected.

    “The two major religions here are against it.

    There is a law existing against the issue of LGBT. The current government of Nigeria would not go against that.

    “I think it is important that we put this out there for those who have reacted largely due to ignorance.

    There is also a Surah, Surah Al-Hujurat in the Holy Quran.

    “Before you put out any information out there, it is important that you cross-check and be sure of your facts.”

    He also called on religious leaders to show understanding, while promising that the government will continue to engage with them.

    Read Also: It’s shameful we are still generating 4.5GW electricity – Tinubu

    He added: “We call on our Ulamas and we are already engaging them and all religious leaders from both the Muslims and the Christian faith to show understanding that this is a very difficult time.

    “We will continue to engage them, we will continue to put out the truth there, we will continue to give them.

    “That is why we came, not just with the document that Nigeria sent, but the entire document relating to the whole issue of Samoa, the so-called Samoa agreement, the cross-cultural agreement.

     “There is nothing we have examined, the Attorney General of the Federation has examined it, and there is nothing that is said there that is of concern.

    “But of course, the government is there to continue to clarify, to continue to explain and to continue to appeal for the understanding of not just the media but for the Nigerian population, for us to continue to grow on the path of progress and unity of our country.

     “Please, we call on all of you, and I want to use this opportunity to thank those media organizations that have provided clarity by fact-checking some of these claims put forward by this particular newspaper.

     “It has been fast-checked, the statements and all the documents are actually out there, and the equality of this agreement has also been shared.”

    Bagudu clarifies agreement

    Bagudu clarified that the agreement signed by Nigeria was for cooperation and the economic development of the country.

     He said: “President Bola Tinubu did not authorise anything that is damaging or hurtful to our sensitivity and we have not signed any such agreement.”

     “Mr. President has undertaken, consistent with his campaign promise, a very demanding diplomacy in order to convince the world that we need all the support and the world is taking it seriously, because there is so much transparency, because there is so much clarity.

    “I recall when we visited Saudi Arabia for the first time, the Minister of Investment of Saudi Arabia stated that they compare what President Nasser al-Baghdadi is doing to that of his brother, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, taking on courageous measures that they should have been taking decades ago.

    “Development partners, as you very well know, are also media savvy. They see what is happening. So let us not ridicule our nation based on misrepresentation.

    “Let us support the commendable endeavours and reward the hard work so that the development partners we are relating with, the investors we are looking for will be interested in our resolve.

    “When industrialists or development partners see a lie coming too far, they will have the right to worry.”

    Bagudu cautioned against reports beclouded with political expediency.

    He said: “So we know that some will do it because it is politically expedient. We can do nothing about it, but we believe the majority of Nigerians are able to see paths for themselves and support so that Nigeria can continue to be respected, Nigeria can continue to be an investment destination.

    “And also appreciate that hardworking men and women in service, in ministries are dealing with these issues and they will be demoralised if all they see is their effort being misrepresented by somebody with a big voice in society, using their power wrongly, a media house or a group of media entrepreneurs.

    “So I appeal to all Nigerians to support the bold, courageous endeavoors we are taking, so that our development partners will also be strengthened and continue to relate with us and to know that we appreciate what they are doing for us.

    Giving insights into the contents of the agreement, Bagudu said Nigeria did not sign an agreement only with the EU but with many other countries.

    He added: “It’s a requirement by those countries so that they set out the parameters of the cooperation.

    “When you get a copy of the document, you will see that this is a broad agreement.

    “It is about education; it is about food security; it is about water and sanitation; it is about decent work; and it is about demography.

    “It is about youth. It is about culture and sustainable development. It is about inclusive economic development. It is about private sector development. It is about human rights, democracy and rule of law. It is about good governance, public administration, personal data, peace and security.

    “So those are the articles. Each article is about an area of cooperation. We signed an agreement with the EU to say that we believe we can cooperate in these areas, in the several areas, which are about 100 and almost 200 distinct areas.”

    Bagudu, who was visibly upset by the narration in the public domain, said Nigeria was painstaking in signing the agreement.

    He added: “Even when we signed this agreement, we had to also sign a specific implementation agreement.

    “For example, we have a rule of law agreement. We have just signed one about four months ago. “The EU will say that for this period of time, between 2024 and 2027, for example, we are going to give you this amount of money.

    “The rule of law is $30 million to support ICPC, to support the EFCC, to support the Ministry of Justice.

    “We have the migration agreement also. We also have on the democratic institutions.

    “So what I say is that within this agreement, there is nowhere where it is mentioned that Nigeria is going to receive $150 billion or any sum for that money.

    “But these areas of cooperation are areas which will develop further and grow further.

    “And they will lead to capital, will lead to support, will lead to technical support that we can enhance good production.

    “One of the biggest supports we are receiving from the EU, for example, is called IDICE, which is our digital. About $300-600 million worth of projects are coming under that.

     “So I would say that there is nowhere in the world of development where you see 150 billion.

    “But these are agreements which I believe, like with other countries, define what you want to relate with those countries in and how to go about it.”

    Responding to a question, Bagudu said: “So you can imagine what about 79 other countries are like. That is why the agreement provides a proviso where a country, each country, not just Nigeria, can issue a declaration, clarifying some basis in which it is signing.

    “Like I gave the example, one of the obvious ones; we didn’t provide it because of concerns about misrepresentation about LGBT, for example. We are clear. 

    “But I gave the example of what we were worried about. We were worried that because of the way Europe is moving to clean energy, we don’t want to sign something that limits our capacity to develop our oil and gas sector clearly.

    “One of the declarations you see made it clear that even though we signed any agreement on climate, we were categorical that it was not to limit us in any way because those are developmental rights and we kept within our constitution.”

    Reports linking Samoa Agreement to LGBT rights irresponsible, says ex-British diplomat

    A former British diplomat in Nigeria, Mr David Roberts, yesterday condemned reports linking the Samoa Agreement Nigeria signed penultimate Friday to the protection of LGBT rights as irresponsible, saying the document was a partnership pact on the growth and development of the Organisation of African, Caribbean and the Pacific States that signed it with EU Member countries.

    There had been a backlash against the Federal Government after a national newspaper published a claim that some provisions of the agreement protect the rights of LGBT, contending that Nigeria signed on the back of a proposed $150bn loan.

    Despite the rebuttal by the Federal Government through the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mr Mohammed Idris, social media remained agog with the condemnation of the agreement, forcing the Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Senator Abubakar Bagudu to address a press conference yesterday to clarify the content of the document further.

    “I found it incredible that anybody could believe that the Samoa Agreement, which is a protocol of economic and social development  between the EU and its member states and the Organisation of African, Caribbean, and Pacific States (OACPS) on the other hand is to further Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) rights,” Roberts said in a statement yesterday. 

    He said nothing could be further from the truth, adding that except the reports were deliberate misinformation, he failed to see how anybody could have read the agreement and come to such a conclusion.

    According to the former diplomat, “the agreement is a document that journalists can read. You do not need a Freedom of Information Act request to read it. It is a public document on the EU’s website.

    “It is a harmless treaty that aims to reduce and eradicate poverty in the ACP nations and lead to the financial integration of African and Caribbean nations into the world economy.”

    He said the best predictor of future events was the past, explaining that it was an agreement that over 50 countries had signed.

    “How many of those countries have been forced to implement the LGBT agenda? Zero. None,” the former Director British Council in Nigeria said.

    Saying that the reports were capable of inciting violence and civil unrest in a country as conservative as Nigeria, Robert said there ought to be punitive consequences for the publishers of the false reports if such irresponsible reportage was to be avoided in future.

  • Russian court bans ‘LGBT movement’

    Russian court bans ‘LGBT movement’

    Russia’s Supreme Court has declared what it calls “the international LGBT public movement” an extremist organisation and banned its activities across the country.

    The ruling was prompted by a motion from the justice ministry, even though no such organisation exists as a legal entity.

    The hearing was held behind closed doors, but reporters were allowed in to hear the court’s decision. Nobody from “the defendant’s side” had been present, the court said.

    Russia’s constitution was changed three years ago to make it clear that marriage means a union between a man and a woman. Same-sex unions are not recognised here.

    Ahead of the ruling, I asked Sergei Troshin, a municipal deputy in St Petersburg who came out as gay last year, what effect it would have.

    “I think this will mean that anyone whom the state considers an LGBT activist could receive a long prison sentence for ‘participating in an extremist organisation’,” he said.

    “For the organiser of such a group, the prison term will be even longer.

    “This is real repression. There is panic in Russia’s LGBT community. People are emigrating urgently. The actual word we’re using is evacuation. We’re having to evacuate from our own country. It’s terrible.”

    In recent years Russia’s LGBT community has come under increasing pressure from the authorities. In 2013, a law was adopted prohibiting “the propaganda [amongst minors] of non-traditional sexual relations”.

    Last year, those restrictions were extended to all age groups in Russia. References to LGBT people have been deleted from books, films, adverts and TV shows. Earlier this month, one Russian TV channel discoloured a rainbow in a South Korean pop video, to avoid being accused of violating the “gay propaganda” law.

    At the Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, Vitaly Milonov, a famously homophobic MP from the ruling party, United Russia, said the ban on LGBT groups was “not about sexual minorities or the private life of individuals”.

    “It’s more about the political agenda proclaimed by this LGBT international movement,” he told me.

    “They have their own tasks, their own goals. They act as a political force, a political structure and the goals of this structure contravene the Russian Constitution.”

    “You talk about a political structure,” I responded. “But there isn’t a movement called the ‘International LGBT public movement.’ How can you ban something that doesn’t exist?”

    “Oh, it’s easy,” Mr Milonov replied. “We can ban any activities from LGBT international organisations here in Russia. That’s nice. We don’t need them.

    “And I’m looking forward to the next step: banning the six-colour rainbow flag. We don’t need this flag. It’s a symbol of the fight with the traditional family. I hope that no-one can show this flag in Russia.”

    Under Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin has embraced an ideology centred around conservative thinking and “traditional family values”. The authorities portray LGBT activism as something inherently Western and hostile to Russia. Pressure on the LGBT community is presented as a means of defending the moral fabric of Russia.

    And is it also a potential vote winner?

    “I think [the court hearing] is linked to the presidential election next March,” believes Sergei Troshin. “[The authorities] are creating an artificial enemy.”

    “They say ‘We are battling the West’. The battle with LGBT people fits in with this anti-Western rhetoric. Fighting both the West and the LGBT community is popular amongst the conservative, anti-Western part of society. So this topic will be pushed in the run-up to the election.”

    “They’re trying to distract attention from more important problems, which the Russian authorities don’t want people to think about,” says Maxim Goldman. He works for a Russian organisation that has been offering support to transgender and non-binary people.

    “As soon as we heard about the Supreme Court hearing, the people who run our organisation realised we would have to leave the country urgently. It became an emergency.”

    I spoke to Maxim, who identifies himself as non-binary, on his final day in Russia. He had packed a small suitcase and was about to head to the airport.

    Read Also: Ban materials promoting LGBT in nursery, primary schools, Reps urge govt

    “I feel totally rejected by my own country,” he said. “We’re supposed to have a democracy here. The people we put in power are supposed to take care of us.

    “But the opposite is happening. They’re punishing us. They’re wiping their feet on us. I’m being forced out.”

    For now, municipal deputy Sergei Troshin is staying. But he has no illusions.

    “I have spoken a lot in the past about LGBT rights,” Sergei tells me. “It’s possible this will be enough to launch a criminal case against me. I hope not, but maybe. And this is terrifying.

    “Russian society is soaked in fear. With every word you’re crossing a mine field. Say one thing and it might land you in prison for five years; say something else, and you’ll get 10 or 15 years behind bars.”

    BBC

  • Ban materials promoting LGBT in nursery, primary schools, Reps urge govt

    Ban materials promoting LGBT in nursery, primary schools, Reps urge govt

    • House to CBN: release N27.6b approved for oil host communities
    • Reps seek establishment of military unit in Sokoto to track bandits

    The House of Representatives has urged the Federal Government to place a total ban on local production, importation, and use of any educational material that teaches or promotes Lesbianism, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) in schools across the country.

    It also urged the Federal Ministry of Education, the Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council, and the Education Research Council (ERC) to carefully vet and censor the contents of educational materials used in nursery and primary schools throughout the country and ensure that they are appropriate and devoid of any connotation of immoral behaviours.

    The House mandated the Committee on Basic Education to ensure compliance.

    These resolutions followed the adoption of a motion, titled: Ban on Inappropriate Educational Materials in Nursery and Pre-Primary Schools in Nigeria, moved by Sulaiman Abubakar Gumi.

    Read Also: Alternative routes as Third Mainland Bridge shuts down for 24hrs

    The Green Chamber noted that the Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) has the statutory responsibility to undertake and promote book development and local authorship for quality assurance at the national level.

    It also said the Curriculum Service Departments undertake the same at the state level, whereas the Education Research Council (ERC) does same in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Abuja.

    The House expressed concern about the influx of foreign educational materials in Nigeria’s nursery and primary schools which teach and promote certain orientaions that are alien and inimical to the country’s cherished norms and values.

    It also expressed concern that the widely used book, Queen Primer, subtly introduces terms like ‘gay’, ‘eros’, among others, “that commonise sexual perversion and immoral behaviours, thus exposing innocent children to terms inappropriate for their age, which is unlawful, unethical, highly immoral and antithetical to child upbringing”.

    Also, the House of Representatives urged the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Ministry of Finance to release the approved N27.6 billion to oil bearing host communities, as prescribed by the Petroleum Industry Act 2021.

    It also urged the Federal Government to hasten the approval for the release of the balance of the funds to host communities.

    The Green Chamber mandated the Committee on Host Communities to ensure and monitor the release of the initial approved N27.6 billion to legitimate representatives of host communities in compliance with the Petroleum Industry Act, 2021, and statutory provisions and report to back within four weeks for further legislative action.

    These resolutions followed the adoption of a motion, titled: Need for the Central Bank of Nigeria to Release the Approved N27.6 Billion as part of Funds Generated from Gas Flaring Penalties to Host Communities in Compliance with the Petroleum Industry Act, moved by Awaji-Inombek D. Abiante.

    The House said it was aware that the previous administration of Muhammadu Buhari approved N27.6 billion, which is part of funds domiciled with the CBN as gas flaring penalties, to host and impacted communities of oil-producing areas.

    It said it was also aware that over N100 billion had been received as gas flaring penalty or fines by the Department of Petroleum Resources and paid into the CBN.

    Also, the House of Representatives yesterday urged the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) and the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) to establish a military formation or unit and utilise local intelligence to track the movements of bandits in Illela and Gwadabawa local government aAreas of Sokoto State.

    The Green Chamber mandated its committees on Defence and Army to ensure compliance.

    These resolutions followed the adoption of a motion, titled: Need to Establish Military Formation in Illela and Gbadabawa Federal Constituency, Sokoto State, moved by Bello Isa Ambarura.

    The Housed noted that Section 14(2) (b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) provides that the security, safety, and welfare of the people of Nigeria shall be the primary purpose of government.

    It also noted the incessant security breaches in Sokoto East and Sokoto South where the lives and properties of the citizens are lost due to the activities of armed bandits in Illela and Gwadabawa local government areas.