Tag: LOAN

  • 17 states to benefit from Fed Govt’s $29.9b loan

    17 states to benefit from Fed Govt’s $29.9b loan

    Seventeen states of the federation are to benefit from the 2016/2018 Medium Term Development Plan of the Federal Government which is expected to be financed from the $29.9 billion loan being sought by President Muhammadu c.

    The states, according to a document sighted by The Nation yesterday in Abuja, include Kaduna, Ogun, Borno, Yobe, Adamawa. Gombe, Delta, Imo, Plateau. Bauchi, Anambra, Ekiti, Lagos, Ebonyi. Abia, Katsina and Jigawa.

    It was learnt that $364million  of the loan will also be used for financing Nigerian Electricity Transmission and Access Project, $500 million for Social Inclusion and Welfare Advancement project while $300million will go to Power Sector Guarantees Project to guarantee investors’ fund.

    About $200 million of the loan will be set aside to implement economic reforms and governance project, $100 million for staple processing support project, while $88 million is to be deployed to the development of the mining sector.

    The government, it was learnt, also intends to set aside $2.5 billion to serve as budget support loan to bridge the gap in the budget and cut the deficit occasioned by the sharp drop in oil price.

    According to a breakdown of states that would benefit from the facility, Kaduna State is expected to benefit to the tune of $350 million to enable it implement its development plan including policy and institutional reforms, while Ogun State will receive $350 million to fund development plan.

    Also Borno, Yobe and Adamawa are to benefit in the area of community and social development projects at the cost of $75 million, while Gombe, Delta, Imo, Plateau, Adamawa and Bauchi will have $90 million devoted for providing safe drinking and sanitation facilities.

    On the other hand, Anambra, Bauchi and Ekiti states will be sharing from $100 million  funds for education while Lagos State is benefit from $200 million projects meant to improve power transmission to support industries in the state.

    Both Enonyi and Abia states are to get funding support for road projects to the tune of $70 million and $100 million respectively; Katsina State is to get $110 million to be used for the rehabilitation and construction of health facilities, including health equipment while Jigawa State will get $32 million for the execution of integrated rural development projects.

    However, Director-General,  Voice of Nigeria, Osita Okechukwu said Buhari’s plan for the utilisation of the foreign loan will cover several critical infrastructure and development needs.

  • Deciphering the value of infrastructure loan

    Great value was lost in the skewed reportage of the keynote address delivered by Mohammad Sanusi, Emir of Kano in Abuja on December 2.  Emir Sanusi, the Federal Government and Nigerians were ill-served by the media’s embellishing of a fiscal element of the address. Sanusi observed that Nigeria is heavily enmeshed in debts that “out of every one Naira Nigeria makes, 40 kobo goes to debt and 60 kobo is left for salaries, health, education, power and infrastructure.”  Proclaiming that Nigeria should borrow more in order to dig itself out of the present debt peonage seems counterintuitive. Yet such argument gains validity, if such borrowing is per se, for development. The redeeming caveat is ensuring “beyond financing established infrastructural needs…that aggregate expenditure is of such quantum and composition to enable exit from recession.”

    The proposed $30 billion loan is tailored mainly to social infrastructure. It’s safe to assume implicit correlation between the $30billion infrastructural development loan and reported plans to offer N20 billion to 36 states respectively, for infrastructural development. The loan document, split into three parts – programmes and projects $11.247bn; special national infrastructure $10.686bn; and Eurobonds and federal budget support, $4.5bn and $3.5bn – didn’t include the sectoral narratives, which made it hard to discern the benefiting geopolitical or economic sectors. But we know this much. Nigeria’s infrastructures are in bad shape and needs remediation. But the dismal state of our infrastructure is hardly by happenstance; they failed gradually, through poor policy articulation and implementation, wrong priorities and wrong utilization of previous loans. Nigerians remain cognizant that past foreign loans dedicated to Nigeria’s steel sector yielded very limited results.

    The value and amortization terms of any loan are best assessed, if the loan is meant for hard infrastructure – power, housing, toll bridges and roads – that yield returns. Same is not always true of loans for soft and social infrastructures. Thus, it may be wise to borrow for hard infrastructure; yet not so wise to borrow for soft infrastructure. This position does not discount the overarching importance of soft infrastructure, needed to promote quality of life and human development, since rising youth unemployment, inequality, and poor healthcare delivery are corollaries of growing disenchantment and portend risks. Nigeria having only extricated herself from the sapping London and Paris Club debts just a decade ago, some heady questions arise. Will Nigeria’s borrowing outcome be any different now? Here is the challenge: Can an external loan – quick-fix, ad-hoc funding – couched in the attractive term of “infrastructure fund” even if it serves as stimulus or bailout, begin to redress existing infrastructure deficit, if its utilization is not properly handled?

    Infrastructural deficit in Nigeria remains huge with sectoral infrastructures suffering major setbacks, which manifest in dismal electric generation and distribution; crumbling roads and bridges that are further exacerbated by a poor maintenance culture.  The deregulated national air transportation system struggles, due to the existing oligopolistic market structures. Recent census shows that the national commercial air fleet shrank from a total of 60 to 20 planes in the past year alone. Prevailing operational challenges translate to air safety concerns. Nigeria is also underserved by its limited ports and waterways infrastructure. The sector is hampered by navigable, but yet to be dredged inland waterways totalling some 3,300km, and dearth of modern vessels. Nigeria’s housing deficit is estimated at 16-20 million, but Nigeria’s housing infrastructure is so laggard that even 20% of its housing needs are presently unrealizable. The mortgage sector remains dysfunctional, given prevalent inefficacious mortgage policies and regiment.  Whereas real estate construction contributed $990 billion or some 6% of U.S. GDP in 2015, and 4% of GDP in Ghana, in Nigeria, contributions via mortgages is a dismal 0.5% of the GDP.

    Whilst Nigeria’s GSM system is much improved, Nigeria’s 97 million GSM users are still underserved with only 21% broadband penetration. With Boko Haram destroying most GSM urban furniture in the North-east; the national landline systems have totally collapsed and are non-existent in most parts of the country. Such setbacks are worsened by high tariffs, lack of periodic maintenance, insufficient public sector funding and unavailability of stable bond and capital markets.  Even as Nigeria’s ICT sector yielded N1.4 trillion in FQ of 2016, the nexus between the parlous state of Nigeria’s communication infrastructure and her inability to fully catalyse the “use of ICTs for different aspects of national development” persists. Relatedly, Nigeria’s rating on the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness index, which assesses “countries’ ability to have good and steady electricity supply, road quality construction, air transportation, and port and rail infrastructures”, remains bleak. Two consecutive surveys between 2014 and 2016 ranked Nigeria 133rd and 134th respectively, out of 144 countries.

    Infrastructure funding and challenges were of lesser concern during the military era. Because democratically elected governments view infrastructure development as democratic dividends, the Jonathan administration prioritized infrastructural development via the National Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan (NIIMP), which linked key economic sectors. The plan envisaged to last for 30 years, would guarantee sustainable economic growth and development and bridge existing infrastructure deficit, if fully implemented. Still Nigeria has suffered from the inability of successive governments to follow through on approved infrastructural projects.  Hence, leadership change and politicians jockeying for preferential funding and sitting of constituency projects, continue to impact negatively on infrastructure development.

    The value of Nigeria’s infrastructure is relative to her historical realities regardless of whether the funding is borrowed or budgeted. Historical realities also reflect the federal government’s unending inability to leverage accruing oil revenue to develop national infrastructure fully. Resultantly, poorly funded and executed policies have contributed to awful deliverance or abandonment of strategic infrastructural projects. Meanwhile, states are increasingly averse to rehabilitating decrepit federal infrastructures, given extant policies prohibiting such repairs without prior authorization and challenges in recouping funds expended by states on federal projects.

    Funding infrastructure via budgets or loans is no longer as important as finding the political will for executing and delivering national projects fully. Not delivering on requisite infrastructure amounts to short-changing the national population and retarding development. As Ejeviome E. Otobo, averred in the recent edition of Jeune Afrique, “The ability of all tiers of government to increase citizens’ access to pipe-borne water, public healthcare and of the federal government to increase electricity supply will be an important test of their commitment to inclusive growth.” And as Abraham Nwankwo, Nigeria’s debt management czar observed; “If the economy does not succeed in converting the external borrowings to domestic productive capacity and self-sustaining economic growth, with substantial diversified export component, the resulting economic and social disruption will be unbearable.” Translated from our historical past to here-and-now, “unbearable” means recession, the new normal for Nigeria. Hence, advancing Nigeria does not require a foreign loan likely to be mismanaged, but a clear delineation of institutional structures and responsibilities for driving the deployment of critical national infrastructure. Such delineation will influence funding, resource and burden sharing among the three tiers of government, with a view to improving domestic productive capacity and sustainable development.

     

    • Obaze and Okoye are of Selonnes Consult Ltd.
  • DMO, Senate Committee discuss $29.9b loan

    DMO, Senate Committee discuss $29.9b loan

    The  Debt Management Office (DMO) and Senate Committee on Local and Foreign Debts, yesterday, discussed the viability of the $29.9 billion offshore borrowing plan by the Federal Government and the mechanisms in place to ensure proper utilisation of the funds.

    The committee, which was on oversight visit to the DMO office, in Abuja, had during the question and answer session, enquired from the debt office, the state of the country’s debt profile.

    In a statement, the DMO said the visit was in line with legislative tradition and provided committee members the opportunity to interact with the DMO Director-General, his management team and appraise the workplace.

    The committee, led by its Chairman, Senator Shehu Sani, equally discussed how the debt office utilised its funds allocation to achieve its organisational mandate.

    In his welcome address, DMO D-G, Dr. Abraham Nwankwo, on behalf of the management and staff, praised the committee for the visit and expressed appreciation of the support, encouragement and guidance the DMO had always enjoyed from its members.

    Nwankwo said that the DMO’s interactions with the committee had always been fruitful and helped greatly towards realising its objectives.

    In his response, Senator Sani said he was delighted to have visited the DMO and the discussions that followed. “This is the first oversight visit since the committee was inaugurated last year. We commended the D-G and his team for their hard work and diligence and acknowledged their efforts towards achieving a sustainable debt profile for the country,” he said.

    He also thanked the D-G for his clear and precise presentation and assured the DMO of the committee’s continued support towards assisting the government to succeed with its change agenda.

    Also at the meeting were senators Ahmed Sani Yarima, Aliyu Magatakarda Wammako and Joseph Obinna.

  • Union protests over N150m loan misappropriation

    The Association of Agricultural and Allied Employees Union of Nigeria (AAEUN) has protested over the alleged misappropriation of its fund by the National President, Comrade Simon Anchaver.

    The protest, which took place at the premises of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Iyaganku, Ibadan, involved state leaders and members.

    During the protest, the Lagos State Chairman of the union, Comrade Obafemi Oyenubi, alleged that the national president took a loan of N150 million on behalf of other members from Heritage Bank without their consent.

    He said the document, which was presented to them, showed that the money was for the purchase of the union’s national secretariat in Abuja, adding that the money was, however, diverted into private pockets.

    “This fraud was discovered when the bank started calling us individually to start paying the loan. So, we engaged the bank to find out what was happening and we were told that Comrade Anchaver obtained a loan on our behalf, with our pictures and without our consent.

    “We wrote a petition to the Economic and Financilal Crimes Commission (EFCC) on the former president of the union, Comrade Anchaver, who wrote our names, about 102 of us, opened an account on our behalf and obtained a loan to the tune of N150 million. We brought it to EFCC because we know that what he did was wrong and it is a criminal offence,” Oyenubi said.

    Oyenubi said the EFCC invited the two parties and promised to look into the issue critically.

    He said other national executives of the union were involved and have saying what they know about the case.

    He urged the EFCC to address the issues without bias, adding that they should emulate the current administration in tackling corruption.

    Speaking with The Nation, Comrade Anchaver admitted the allegation. He, however, said that the issue would be addressed.

  • Buhari, $29.96 billion loan and the masses

    SIR: Whenever the word ‘foreign loan’ is mentioned, many Nigerians become troubled; the debt traps of the past still haunt us.

    Some Nigerians are now asking quite a few questions on the federal government’s proposed $29.96 billion loan. The administration of President Muhammadu Buhari says that within the next three years, it plans to borrow $29.96 billion from the World Bank, African Development Bank, and Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) to execute key infrastructure projects across the country between 2016 and 2018.

    Some people are asking: Will the masses enjoy any benefit from the proposed $29.9 billion loan? Will the Muhammadu Buhari government judicially utilize the monies? Is it the right time for the loan? Will the whopping 29 billion dollar loan not take Nigeria back to the league of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC)?

    Nigeria is in a recession mainly due to the reckless mismanagement of the country’s abundant resources by previous regimes and the failure of the political class to save for the rainy days. Experts and public commentators alike believe that these loans are one of the fastest ways to get out of the recession.

    President Muhammadu Buhari’s global image as a no nonsense fighter of corruption and international approval of Nigeria’s capacity to handle such a huge loan at this critical time, is something that all Nigerians must flaunt.

    The biggest and richest countries are the most heavily indebted. The UK for instance is in debt deficit of 11% of its GDP and has 43bn pounds of interest to pay. In United States, if you share national debt among its citizens, each man, woman and child will owe about $42,998 according to Money and Time survey by Time magazine. But there is huge difference between national debt and family debt. What most people do not understand is that national debt is not family finances. The difference is that government has the central bank to control the economy. It has more financial and monetary flexibility to get out of trouble. Also government lives a long infinite life unlike a family with average life span of 75 years. Today US National debt is $19trillion, more than quarter of its nominal GDP, yet it paradoxically has the largest economy in the world and remains the richest nation on earth. The fact that institutions are willing to lend Nigeria $30bn tells much about its economic viability and credit rating. Kenya had sought and failed to secure $200m loan.

    President Buhari’s plan to borrow will definitely stimulate the economy; quickly take the country out of recession and fast-track the much needed infrastructure development.

    Buhari’s government has in place good policies and framework for fiscal and public debt sustainability. So, those people worrying unnecessarily about the $29.9 billion dollar loan should put their minds at rest.  The President cannot be a party to the type of reckless and ineffective external borrowings of the past which resulted in a debt burden that Nigeria could not manage.

     

    • Zayyad I. Muhammad,

    Jimeta, Adamawa State

  • Loan not a trap, says DMO

    Loan not a trap, says DMO

    The $29.9 billion loan request by the Federal Government is not a trap, Debt Management Office (DMO) Director-General Dr Abraham Nwankwo has said.

    “The first thing to note is that this borrowing is normal. Normal in the sense that over the past 20 years, there is no year we have not borrowed; so, interpreting the proposal submitted to the National Assembly by Mr President for a three-year borrowing programme to be an indirect way of trapping the country does not seem to be logical because Nigeria has always borrowed every year.”

    He stated: “Every year there is a budget and if you check the budgets many years back you will see that we have been borrowing both external and domestic; so there is nothing new about this. Let me also emphasize that since we exited from the Paris and London club debt in 2005-2006 we have always borrowed almost from all these sources we want to borrow from now.”

    “If the $29.9 billion external loan is secured, if we build infrastructure in the next five to seven  years before those loans mature in 15 to 30 years, Nigeria would be in a position to service her debt and turn around the economy.”

    Nwankwo argued that “we cannot as a nation fold our hands and remain where we, are we want to move forward by mobilising resources but if there is a way anybody can propose we mobilise revenue that is enough to cover the infrastructure deficit in the next five to seven years that would be fine, but the important thing is that we need to mobilize revenue from whatever appropriate source to solve the infrastructure deficit to turn around the economy, to exit recession, to make sure that ones and for all we are no more a mono cultural economy.”

    By providing infrastructure, Nwankwo noted that “if the country is exporting five to 10 different products whether there is a shock globally or not Nigeria will be stable and we will not be crying about exchange rate reserve because we are well diversified that is the whole idea and that is what government wants to achieve.”

     

  • $29.9bn loan not a trap, says DMO

    $29.9bn loan not a trap, says DMO

    The federal government has denied claims that the $29.9 billion loan it plans to access is a trap.
    Director General of Debt Management Office (DMO), Dr Abraham Nwankwo dismissed the claims that the planned borrowing was an attempt to trap Nigeria in a web of indebtedness.
    ” The first thing to note is that this borrowing is normal. Normal in the sense that over the past 20 years there is no year we have not borrowed, so interpreting the proposal submitted to the National Assembly by Mr President for a three year borrowing programme to be an indirect way of trapping the country does not seem to be logical because Nigeria has always borrowed every year.”

    “Every year there is a budget and if you check the budgets many years back you will see that we have been borrowing both external and domestic so there is nothing new about this. Let me also emphasize that since we exited from the Paris and London club debt in 2005-2006 we have always borrowed almost from all these sources we want to borrow from now.”

  • $30b loan, not a dime for Southeast

    It’s just as well that the Senate shoved aside the proposed plan by the federal government to borrow about $30 billion. It is hoped that a lot more diligence would be brought to bear on the document. And of course, it is expected that a little more sensitivity and political wisdom is applied in allotting the projects especially as concerns the Southeast zone.

    The president’s expenditure plan to the National Assembly seems patently shoddy and ad-hoc in nature that the only good about it may well be the methodical exclusion and sidetracking of the Southeast. Here are the big ticket projects: Mambila power plant (Northeast); Coastal Railway at the Calabar- Ph deep sea segment (Southsouth); modernisation of Lagos-Ibadan-Kaduna-Kano railway (Southwest-Northcentral-Northwest) and Abuja mass rail transit phase 2. Not even a tangential mention of the Southeast; it surely cannot be an accident.

    This attitude; let’s call it malevolent inequity will eternally set back any country and indeed damage its soul. We will return to it.

    When the federal government announced its intention to borrow such a huge chunk of dollars from multilateral institutions recently, not a few Nigerians were apprehensive. A whirlwind of debate was immediately set off with the house divided down the middle.

    And when the breakdown of projects was released later, the dialogue only gained momentum. One was not moved anyhow by the loan quest because one never thought that Nigeria’s problem was a dire shortage of cash more than a paucity of ideas and the energy to get results in quick time.

    One had said it here several times that even though we have about 50 per cent revenue shortage today, that does not make Nigeria broke and prostrate to the point of frantically scrounging for cash. The refrain from the managers of our economy is: ‘spend ourselves out of recession’. This is the same antidote deployed by the US and her allies way back in 2008 when the West was hit by a violent recession.

    But we ask, though the symptoms may be the same and the problem may bear the same appellation, the prognosis may well differ.

    The US, Japan and some developed countries of the West pumped trillions of dollars in their economies to reflate it all right, but it is basic knowledge that these are well-developed service and production economies that can absorb trillions of dollars in their massive shop-floors and expand their exporting frontiers.

    But Nigeria’s economy is still about 90 per cent import dependent. Again, when you borrow billions of dollars in a state of fiscal indiscipline, the chunk of it would be vired to workers’ emoluments and overheads, importing petroleum products, staple foods, home appliances, service parts for presidential jets, travel allowances, school fees and foreign medical bills.

    Yes, we have outlined projects to be embarked upon, but even this will involve huge importation of materials and machinery. Worse is that most of the so-called projects are not likely to be realised in five years and perhaps another five years to begin to yield revenues if any. Result: we will remain in recession for a long time yet and probably sink deeper because we are not doing the right things.

    Again, I say Nigeria is not broke and liquidity-starved but that government is pursuing the wrong policies. We only need to move aggressively from an import-dependent country to a service-driven and highly productive country.

    Let us start from the very simple and the most basic. President Muhammadu Buhari in one of his pre-inauguration statements promised to revive Nigeria’s national airline upon resumption. But few months in office the story changed to something like flag carrier not our priority, meaning that there was no think-through before the initial pronouncement. More irksome, who worked out the economics of it to determine that it wasn’t priority or cost effective?

    Today, government is bugged down with and must cough out over $600 million foreign currency flight ticket revenues of foreign airlines. If Air Nigeria was flying, this amount will surely be far less plus attendant jobs and technology transfer opportunities. Over 30 African countries have carriers including minnows like Rwanda, Botswana, Mauritania, Gambia, Namibia and Burkina Faso. Among Kenya, Ethiopia, Egypt, Maroc and South African Airlines, the federal government probably has about $200 million unremitted ticket earnings.

    Air Nigeria could have got half of that. And the good news is that it would have cost the country next to nothing to set up if she knows what to do. The African countries running airlines don’t have anything over Nigeria. Now instead of Nigeria becoming a hub for air transport in Africa and taking the best advantage of the sector, we are today stuck with how to pay out huge ticket dollars to other countries’ airlines.

    This is just one example. One can list 12 other strategic interventions this government would have consummated quickly since May 29, 2015, which would in concert, have kept this economy stable if not buoyant. But what we have had and still have are wasted opportunities, inertia and a general lack of a grand vision.

    Are we serious about stopping the massive importation of petroleum products? We could have achieved 50% of that six months ago. Are we focusing the proper attention on agriculture with a target to stop food imports? Are we methodically revamping cocoa, rubber, palm oil and cotton industries? What are the target dates?

    Which serious government borrows money to build power plants, railway lines and roads these days when international concession funds are out there and can be accessed? Nearly all these projects listed for the loan can be built and operated by foreign consortia with private capital. Did anyone around here ever considered international open bids for these projects?

    Finally, on the small matter of excluding the Southeast of Nigeria from this loan bazaar, it must be depressing, if not agonising to people from this part of Nigeria that their zone do not deserve any major project in a loan they would partake equally in paying back. What a pity? What can we say than to conclude that it only reinforces the cast-in-stone mindset we know too well of PMB towards Ndigbo. And as we have said here several times, this most un-presidential behaviour would hound his presidency all the way to the end and impugn his persona even long after his time.

     

    Callousness at Min. of Defence

    With the recent news of mind-boggling malfeasance in the Ministry of Defence (MoD), and what we are still hearing, shall we say that callousness has met corruption? We hear that in Command Schools which are under the Military Education Corps, more than half of their teachers are temporary workers who are paid only about N20, 000 to N30, 000 monthly.

    We also hear that most of these teachers have been in this temporary position for between 10 to 20 years without conversion. Again, we hear most of these teachers are master’s degree holders.

    And how about this? In the past six years, there has not been promotion for teachers in the directorate cadre of Military Education Corps. But this may not be strange except that each year MoD invites hundreds of qualified candidates to Abuja for a four-day phoney promotion interview. And every year for the past six years, the story has been the same: NO VACANCY.

    And the question is: if there was no vacancy to promote to the directorate cadre, why does MoD invite teachers to Abuja from all over the country without one kobo of estacode? In whose interest is this annual jamboree and who is getting rich by it?

    If the Ministry of Education (MoE) conducts the same annual interview and promotes every year; if MoE pays candidates estacode for the Abuja trips why is it different with MoD? Are military schools’ teachers being treated like slaves because they are civilians? Will MoD treat uniformed men this way? Will they withhold military officers’ promotions for six years?

    Apparently, MoD is still not completely clean of corruption yet; it seems to require a further clean sweep.

  • FG to represent $29.9 bn loan request with detailed information, says Lai Mohammed

    The Minister of Information, Alhaji Lai Muhammed on Wednesday said that President Muhammadu Buhari would reapply for the approval of $29.9 billion loan.

    The first request for external borrowing to fund critical infrastructural projects in the country between 2016 to 2018 was rejected by the Senate on Tuesday.

    But briefing State House correspondents at the end of the Federal Executive Council, (FEC) meeting, Mohammed said that lack of detailed information frustrated the approval of the first request sent to National Assembly.

    According to him, the government would provide the necessary information which the Senate needed for the approval.

    The minister also maintained that the disagreement between the legislative and executive arms of government were not unusual and that it was in the interest of Nigerians.

    “It is not unusual for the government and the Senate to have some disagreements, they want more information.

    “We will give them all the information they need and we are sure that by the time we finish they (lawmakers) will approve the request.” He said

  • ‘Why Fed Govt’s bid for $29b loan may be hampered’

    ‘Why Fed Govt’s bid for $29b loan may be hampered’

    •Lack of substantive auditor-general may be stumbling block

    The Federal Government’s bid to borrow $29 billion from external sources may be stalled by some institutional lapses and the absence of a substantive federal auditor general.

    Some senators have said such loans and grants from external sources must be accompanied by a confirmation report by a substantive federal auditor general before the funds are released.

    The lawmakers said standards set by global financial institutions, such as World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and African Development Bank (ADB) required a confirmation report from a substantive auditor general before the funds are disbursed to recipient countries.

    Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriation Senator Danjuma Goje expressed doubts at the workability of the loan request during an interactive session with Minister of Finance Mrs. Kemi Adeosun and Minister of Budget Planning Senator Udoma Udo Udoma  last Thursday.

    “I just hope that the Federal Government will succeed in obtaining these loans with the situation on ground,” Goje had stated.

    Mrs. Adeosun, however, assured the committee that steps were being taken to ensure a smooth sail for the loans.

    Nigeria has no substantive federal auditor general since the retirement in May of Mr. Samuel Ukura. The tenure of Mrs. Florence Anyanwu, who acted in that capacity, has expired.

    The two Public Accounts committees in the National Assembly have observed lack of coordination and poor quality of presentation by the Office of the Auditor General in the absence of a substantive head.

    The Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), in May, directed the Federal Civil Service Commission (FCSC) to prepare to appoint a federal auditor-general.

    The memo from the SGF, with reference: 58365/S.3/11/82, dated May 25, 2016, was signed by Mohammed Bukar, permanent secretary (General Services) Office of the SGF.

    The FCSC, in July, shortlisted and forwarded names of three candidates for the position to President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The candidates were Christopher Nyong, Nabasu Bako and Omoniyi Adeyeye.

    The President is said to have since forwarded their names to a seven-man committee to determine the best man for the job.

    It was learnt last week the seven-man committee submitted its report and recommendations for approval by the President, but the report is being kept in abeyance.