Tag: Maina

  • Pension Scam: Coalition of civil society wants Maina prosecuted

    Pension Scam: Coalition of civil society wants Maina prosecuted

    Coalition of Civil Society Group for Transparency and Good Governance (CCSGTGG) has called for the prosecution of former chairman of defunct Pension Task Team, Alhaji Abdulrashid Maina over an alleged embezzlement of N100 billion pension funds.

    The President of CCSGTGG, Comrade Ali Abacha at a news conference in Abuja Tuesday said since Abdulrashid Maina has been indicted by the Senate Committee on Ethics, Public Petition and Privileges after a thorough investigation on the Senate Pension scam, he should be prosecuted and face the full wrath of the law.

    He called on the relevant security agencies to prosecute Alhaji Abdulrashid Maina to serve as deterrent to others.

    The group described the allegation of N3billion bribe on the Senate Joint Committee on Pension Investigation and its chairman, Senator Aloysious Etuk, as a calculated ploy to smear the image of the committee and its leadership, adding that Maina was only “chasing shadows instead of doing himself the honour of refunding the excessive pension refund he diverted for personal use, without recourse to the plight of the highly battered retirees.”

    His words: “We the coalition of civil society groups can assure Maina that we shall mobilise all Nigerians, particularly retirees and pensioners alike to forestall the likes of Abdulrashid Maina from being given or appointed into any public office any more in this country, not even in his home state or local government.

    “We, therefore, make bold to state that no amount of sponsored blackmail on the Senate Joint Committee on Pension Investigation or on the integrity of Senator Aloysius Etuk will derail the thought pattern of Nigerians, particularly the pensioners from continuous call on Maina to refund the massive pension fund he (Maina) personally amassed as the chairman of the defunct Pension.”

  • Nigeria to accelerate UN resolutions on women, peace

    Nigeria has committed itself to accelerate the national and regional implementation of relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions, especially on women, peace and security, Women Affairs Minister Zainab Maina has said.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Maina disclosed this when she addressed member states during the Third Committee of the 68th Session of the UN General Assembly in New York on Friday.

    “Nigeria is making progress in implementing resolution 1325 as follow-up of the regional workshop on the resolution that took place in Dakar, Senegal, in April 2013.

    “In the same vein, Nigeria is stressing the importance of compliance with council’s resolution 1820 on ending acts of sexual violence against women in conflict situations,’’ the minister added.

    She said that to create public awareness, Nigeria established an Inter-Ministerial Committee on Women and Peace.

    The minister said that its membership were drawn all relevant agencies and civil society organisations working in the area of peace building and conflict resolution.

    Maina said this was in addition to the launch of a National Action Plan and advocacy sensitisation aimed at ensuring women’s involvement in peace building and conflict resolution.

     

  • Catholic diseases: Mania

    Mania can be considered colloquially as an excessive interest, love, or devotion to something such as a hobby, e.g., car racing or collection of artworks. A woman might say to a man: “I am mad about you”. Often we refer to a genius as mad. Mania and madness have various connotations in social life. Such colloquial mania or madness is often desirable, acceptable, or admirable.

    The medical condition of mania is not desirable or admirable, and in many cases, not acceptable. Mania is a “mental disorder characterized by extreme excitement and energy” (The American Academy of Physicians’ Family Health and Medical Guide, 1996). The Stedman’s Concise Medical Dictionary for the Health Professions, 3rd Editions defines maniain two ways: “an emotional disorder characterized by euphoria or irritability, increased psychomotor activity, rapid speech, flight of ideas, decreased need for sleep, distractibility, grandiosity, and poor judgement” or “ an abnormal love for, or morbid impulse towards, some specific object, place, or action”. The Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (6th Edition) gives a definition from psychology for mania: “a mental illness in which somebody has an obsession about something that makes them extremely anxious, violent, or confused”. Webster’s New World College Dictionary (4th Edition) gives several definitions amongst which are: “a type of mental disorder characterized by an abnormal preoccupation, compulsion, etc.” Mania is difficult to define and for the purpose of this article, I prefer to consider it simply as super-reaction to a person, place, thing, or event; activity that goes beyond the supports of reason and wisdom.

    Every human being becomes medically manic under various conditions, thus mania is a catholic or universal medical condition. Underlying genetic predispositions, cultural, religious, spiritual, social, psychological, temporal, economic, political, and other varied influences can precipitate manic episodes or stable mania in individuals. A manic person is hurtful to self and to others and in many cases more hurtful to others than to self. Thus mania is a condition we should all be aware of and know that we all have the possibility of developing any time, any day, anywhere, anyhow.

    People with stable mania, chronic mania, established manic lifestyles, attitudes, or behaviour, are possibly safer than people who fall into instantaneous and unexpected acute mania. The established known maniacs can often be tolerated, accepted within an understanding society, and cared for to fit into regular life. Persons known to have chronic mania can be regulated medically, legally, morally, and charitably, therefore any possible harm from them is limited, contained, or aborted. Some cases can fit well into family life, with other members of the family being understanding and supportive.

    Instantaneous mania is more common than we can believe and because it may not linger, it may pass unnoticed, yet leaving behind significant harm. We may never think of ourselves as sometimes becoming instantaneously mad or manic therefore we look at historical examples. When King Herod gave an order to kill innocent babies, he was mad. In a moment of madness he initiated significant harm killing all children, two years old and under in Bethlehem and the surrounding coasts. He could not reason in that moment, he was pathologically angry with the wise men that did not return to him. We can recount Hitler’s episodes, Idi Amin’s atrocities, and terrors spread by religious fanaticisms of all faith institutions. Pathologic anger, fear, dread, envy, hate, greed, lust, vengeance, rivalry, etc., can develop in any person instantaneously and precipitate madness. Such madness is never expected by the person who goes mad or by the victims. Because the victims are unguarded, they are surely affected or hurt. Therefore, for all of us, knowing how to not get mad is an important aspect of good health and safe living.

    Within families, manic episodes by persons that were not known as mad have resulted in homes being burnt to ashes; family members being burned and disfigured; family members being stabbed, shot with a gun, poisoned, or hurt for life in various ways; property being destroyed; economic losses; or violation and disruption of good life in various ways. Any of these episodes may happen one pleasant, happy, sunny day when everybody has been feeling good and happy.

    The unpredictable possibility of madness from anyone, anywhere, anytime, anyhow, makes it necessary for us to take a closer look at this medical condition and how to save ourselves from it.

    To be continued.

    Dr. ’Bola John is a biomedical scientist based in Nigeria and in the USA. For any comments or questions on this column, please Email bolajohnwritings@yahoo.com or call 07028338910

  • Maina: Not yet closed

    Maina: Not yet closed

    •The allegation of N195 billion fraud is too serious to be covered up by technicalities

    He was supposed to be a man on the run. After several months in hiding, Abdulrasheed Maina–erstwhile boss of the Pension Reform Task Force Team, showed up recently – not to prove his innocence or even disprove the misdemeanours linked to his name; rather, he wants to be restored to his plum civil service job as Assistant Director at the Customs, Immigration and Prison Pension Office.

    The suit, filed at the National Industrial Court has the Office of the Head of Service of the Federation, the Senate, the Federal Civil Service Commission, Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice; Clerk of the Senate as well as Clerk of the National Assembly as respondents.

    Why shouldn’t he? An Abuja Federal High Court presided over by Justice Adamu Bello had quashed the arrest warrant issued by the Senate on February 2, over his failure to appear before it in respect of his management of pension funds. The court also granted perpetual injunction restraining the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) from arresting him – having been declared wanted subsequent to the Senate’s warrant.

    The saga of the erstwhile boss of the Pension Reform Task Force Team, is yet another example of the many paradoxes dogging the nation. At best, it is symptomatic of the well-known impotence of our institutions in the face of alleged breaches of our laws, at worst, it is evidence of the institutional penchant to pursue shadows instead of substance.

    The substance here is the N195 billion fraud allegation levelled against Maina, which appears to have been forgotten. The Senate could not get him to help clear the fog on the affair. Now, armed with Justice Bello’s ruling, which held that the Senate warrant of arrest was out of order, and a restraining order on the police, it seems unlikely that Maina would ever honour the Senate’s summon not to talk of helping to shed light on the fraud said to have taken place at the police pensions office under his watch.

    Of course, the whole affair is unfortunate. Clearly, had the Senate not elevated mere procedural issues over and above the substance of fraud alleged, the ensuing muddle would have been avoided.

    Yes, we do not deny that the issue of Maina’s non-appearance before the Senate and the weighty allegations of fraud are somewhat linked. They are however distinct and separate – and the Senate ought to have taken due care to separate them.

    For treating the institution with contempt, the Senate was in order to have sought to punish Maina. However, the criminal allegations ought to have been referred to the anti-graft bodies. To compound the muddle, the Senate mounted pressure on President Goodluck Jonathan to determine Maina’s appointment outside of the strictures of applicable civil service rules. We see this as a grave error on their part.

    We do not however consider Maina’s case as closed – at least not yet. First, we find the inertia of both the Federal Civil Service Commission and the Office of the Head of Service of the Federation in the entire affair somewhat unnerving. Why should the two institutions wait to be prodded to act in a matter of discipline of one of their own? Should the interest of their own override national interest?

    The fraud allegation against Maina remains an allegation, though a grave one. He deserves his day in court. He must be made to answer to the weighty charges. As nothing in the ruling of Justice Bello can be interpreted as shielding him from investigation and prosecution, we expect the anti-graft bodies to step in – except they are convinced that there are no grounds to proceed. Even at that, the nation still needs to have the full facts on the whole saga involving Abdulrasheed Maina.

  • Dismissal: Maina drags HOS, six others to court

    Dismissal: Maina drags HOS, six others to court

    The former Chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team, Abdulrasheed Maina, on Wednesday dragged the Head of Service of the Federation and six others before the National Industrial Court, for alleged unlawful dismissal.

    The others are the Federal Civil Service Commission, Ministry of Interior, the Attorney-General of the Federation, the Senate, the Clerk of the Senate and the Clerk of the National Assembly.

    Maina is praying the court to make a declaration that his purported dismissal as chairman of the task team was illegal, null and void.

    He is also praying the court to order the defendants to reinstate him into the service.

    The News Agency of Nigeria recalls that Maina was dismissed by the Head of Service for allegedly absconding from duty and attempting to evade arrest.

    When the case came up for mention on Wednesday, the claimant was not in court. He was represented by his counsel, Mr. Mahmud Magaji (SAN).

    NAN also reports that two of the seven defendants were represented in court when the case was mentioned.

    Mr. Polycap Hamman, a Principal State Counsel, who represented the office of the Head of Service, told the court that he had filed all his processes.

    However, Counsel to the Federal Civil Service Commission (second defendant), Mrs. Ebuk Ekpo, informed the court that she filed her processes “out of time.’’

    Ekpo asked the court to adjourn the matter to enable her regularise her position in the interest of justice.

    The President of the court, Justice Babatunde Adejumo, adjourned the case to May 28 for adoption of written addresses.

     

  • Court grants perpetual injunction against Maina’s arrest

    Court grants perpetual injunction against Maina’s arrest

    The embattled Chairman of the disbanded Pension Reform Task Force, Mr. Abdulrasheed Maina, scored a big victory against the Senate on Wednesday as a Federal High Court granted a perpetual injunction restraining his arrest.

    The court also set aside an earlier warrant of arrest issued on him.

    According to Justice Adamu Bello, who delivered the judgment in the enforcement of Fundamental Human Right suit instituted by Maina, the verdict is pegged on the ground that the Senate did not follow due process in issuing the warrant of arrest.

    He also noted that the Senate failed to annex all necessary documents to aid the dismissal of Maina’s request before the court.

    However, Bello cautioned against misreading his judgment as an affirmation that the Senate lacks the powers to investigate or summon any person to give evidence regarding any subject matter under investigation.

    He stated that the injunction only has to do with the warrant of arrest being set aside.

    In the suit, Maina dragged the Senate, Senate President, and the Clerk of the Senate, before the court.

    Joined in the suit are the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service, Senate Committee on State and Local Government Administration, the Inspector General of Police, Sen. Alloysius Etuk, Chairman, Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service, Sen. Kabiru Gaya, Chairman, Senate Committee on State and Local Government Administration.

    He asked the court to quash the purported report of the Senate committee’s resolutions and declare the warrant issued for his arrest as unconstitutional, null and void.

  • Maina’s suit: Judge warns Senate against delay

    Maina’s suit: Judge warns Senate against delay

    A Federal High Court, Abuja, yesterday warned parties in the suit by the Chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team (PRTT), Mr. Abdul-Rasheed Maina, to avoid delaying the proceedings.

    Justice Adamu Bello gave the warning while granting the application by the respondent’s counsel, Ken Ikonne, who sought an extension of time within which to file and serve a counter affidavit and written address out of time.

    Maina’s counsel Mahmud Abubakar Magaji (SAN) then asked the court for a short adjournment to enable him respond to the counter affidavit and other processes filed by the respondents.

    “Anything that will be a ploy to delay proceedings should be dropped, so that this matter should be given expeditious hearing in the interest of all the parties,” Justice Bello said while granting the application brought before him by the counsel representing the Senate and other respondents, Ken Ikonne.

    He adjourned the matter till March 5, for parties to adopt their written addresses.

    The respondents are Senate President David Mark, the Senate, the Clerk of the Senate, the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service and its chairman, Senator Aloysius Etok; and the Senate Committee on State and Local Government Administration and its chairman, Senator Kabiru Gaya.

    Joined as a respondent in the suit is the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Mohammed Abubakar.

    Maina was recently declared wanted by the Police Headquarters following an arrest warrant signed by Mark because he refused to honour the Senate’s invitation to defend himself for alleged pension fraud.

    In the substantive suit, Maina is seeking an order setting aside the warrant of arrest issued on Febraury 2, following a resolution by the Senate.

    He is pleading with the court to quash the purported report of the Senate committee’s resolutions that led to the bench warrant.

    According to him, the action violated his fundamental right as guaranteed under Section 35(1) of the 1999 Constitution.

    Maina is praying the court to restrain the Senate from interfering with his official duties and from inviting him having completed and submitted their report without giving him a fair hearing.

    He is also asking for N100 billion as exemplary damages and N500,000 as general damages.

  • Maina the fugitive

    Maina the fugitive

    •The Presidency should explain why, by its tardiness, the pension boss escaped

    It took the umbrage from the Senate for the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, to order the arrest of Mr. Abdulrasheed Maina, over his ignominious activities in the Pension Reform Task Team.

    Maina apparently exploited the president’s initial indifference to the matter; he was allowed to roam the streets and plot his escape during the Senate deliberations. Inspector-General of Police, Mohammed Abubakar, finally expressed helplessness on the floor of the Senate: Maina the wanted had become Maina the fugitive. He had escaped.

    The whole saga started in November, 2011, when the Senate mandated its Joint Committee on Establishment, Public Service and States and Local Governments to conduct a public investigation into pension administration and management in the country in the last five years. On June 20, 2012, the joint committee submitted its report to the Senate, stating among other findings and observations that Maina failed to appear before it to account for pension funds of the Customs, Immigration and Prisons Pensions Office (CIPPO) amounting to about N195 billion during the period. Maina spurned several other invitations to appear before the committee to respond to the grave allegations.

    Even after Senate President David Mark invoked the powers of the Senate to compel Maina’s presence at the public investigative hearing, the Pension Reform Task Force (PRTF) Chairman remained recalcitrant. Obviously pushed to the wall, the Senate President issued a warrant for his arrest – an order that the Inspector-General of Police inexplicably failed to carry out. Yet, Maina not only freely granted media interviews impugning the integrity of the Senate; he made futile bids to get court order preventing his arrest as ordered by the Senate President. It is against this background that the senators felt Maina was enjoying protection from high quarters.

    The presidency, which claims to launch a war on corruption, did not show any form of indignation to this act of public outrage.

    It must be put on record that Maina has been known to be cosy with the President, and has been seen on more than a few occasions with President Goodluck Jonathan at airports.

    Was that the reason for the tardiness from the President in ordering the IG to nab the suspect?

    That is why we find it unacceptable that presidential spokesman Reuben Abati, on the night of February 13, said it was only the office of the Head of Service that could discipline Maina if indeed he had breached any civil service rules. Yet, by Friday last week, the presidency was singing a different tune. Abati said that President Jonathan, having been briefed by the Inspector-General of Police, of Maina’s apparent abandonment of his official duties, had directed the Head of Service, Alhaji Isa Sali, “to act expeditiously on the disciplinary proceedings against Alhaji Maina and report back to him on actions taken”.

    This is a shameful contradiction that fails to save President Jonathan’s face. Maina may thus be disciplined for absconding from duty without leave, contrary to Public Service Rules No. 030301 to 030304. This scenario only underscores the degree of institutional decay in the country and the embarrassing impunity that has come to characterise the public service.

    Investigating the financial malfeasance is one thing, but allowing the man to be a fugitive when he should be in court answering questions on what he knows about the allegations betrays an executive branch out of sync with its duties and obligation to fight corruption.

     

    • Being a repeat of our editorial yesterday on pension boss, Abdulrasheed Maina. We regret the mix-ups in that edition.

     

  • Before Maina is sacrificed

    Before Maina is sacrificed

    Until he became the chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team (PRTT), Abdulrasheed Maina, was an unknown quantity in the Federal Civil Service. A level 14 officer, he took his queue behind many other top officers. This is the Maina, who has today become the issue in pension matters in the country. How and what informed the decision to give him the PRTT job, which seems to have entered his head, we may never know. This is, however, not to take away from him, his capability to do the job. His bosses would have seen certain qualities in him which informed their decision to put him on the task team. He is not only on the team, he is the boss.

    As the team leader, Maina is expected to set example to members in his conduct and behaviour. As the task team’s face, he must comport himself in public and in private and ensure that he does not draw attention to himself. Maina is handling a delicate assignment – probing the administration of pension in order to reform the system. The truth be told, our pension system needs reform if workers must not continue to hold the short end of the stick after retirement. We see what many pensioners go through today in the pursuit of their pension. They stay in queue for long hours; at times they bring their beds and toiletries to the pay points because they don’t when they will be paid.

    When I see aged men and women, who toiled for their country, being treated like this in their twilight, my heart bleeds. As pensioners, these people should not be begging before we pay their entitlements, but that is what the system has reduced them to. In some cases, these pensioners collapse and die on the queue or on their way to the pay centres. These are some of the ills of the pension system which should have since been corrected. Those who brought in Maina saw in him a man that can bring the desired change to our much abused pension fund towards which workers save but get nothing from after retirement.

    Maina may be the man to do the job, but the controversy now surrounding him appear not to make it healthy for him to remain on the task team. Those who hate his gut have got him where they want him. Maina played into their hands because he was not tactful in the discharge of his assignment. He didn’t realise that the pension cabal will fight back with all they have. These are people who have been feeding fat on easy money for years and all of a sudden, a small boy comes from nowhere to put san san for their gari. The mistake he made was that he didn’t know when to talk and when to keep quiet. Yes, the PRTT has uncovered what it calls a huge pension fraud and also recovered some money from the fraudsters.

    It is good that the team has done all this, but can Nigerians know those behind the scam? Are they top government officials? Have they been arrested? If not, what is delaying their arrest? Or has the matter not been reported to the police? In a task like this, Maina and his team have to work with the police for their own safety and to avoid blackmail. We know our society too well. Those who have something to hide and feel that the team may indict them will not hesitate to cry wolf where there is none. Maina may not have borne this in mind when he went blabbing about those involved in pension frauds.

    Perhaps, if  Maina had stopped at that point, he would not have run into trouble, but he didn’t. He added members of the National Assembly to boot and got himself into trouble with the lawmakers. The distinguished and honourable fellows are now asking for his head for opening his mouth too wide. What did Maina say that irked the lawmakers. He was quoted as saying that some of them demanded bribe from him. The allegation prompted the lawmakers to invite him, but rather than honour the invitation, he chose to hold court right inside the National Assembly Complex and repeated the statement which got him into trouble in the first place. Maina, it seems, has some facts about how billions of naira of pension cash were stolen in the past. It looks as if he has the names of those involved and the huge amount involved. But he seems to have a challenge and that is who will he tell his story.

    Should he tell it to the Na

    tional Assembly members

    who are doing an assignment similar to his? Or should he wait until he submits his report before he comes out with the earthshaking tale about how our leaders killed the pension scheme? There lies Maina’s dilemma, which he didn’t know how to handle. He thought that by accusing the lawmakers publicly he would get them off his neck. He didn’t know that he was further compounding his problem. He is now a man on the run because he has bitten more than he can chew.  With the Senate and House of Representatives baying for his blood, Maina will not find it easy wriggling out of the problem he has brought upon himself.

    With the lawmakers employing blackmail, over this matter, Maina is as good as gone from the task team, if not the civil service. The National Assembly may have its grouse with Maina, but it does not have to malign others in order to make its point. I don’t really like the way Maina treated the National Assembly’s invitation. No person, no matter how big should be allowed to treat a revered institution like the National Assembly the way and get away with it in order not to set a bad precedent. If Maina goes scot-free, others will toe the line and before you know it we will have a legislature which people will treat with scorn. We must not allow that.

    But with due respect, Senate President David Mark carried his anger too far when he took Maina to the cleaners on February 13 for treating the National Assembly with disdain. In tongue-lashing Maina, Mark descended on the press which he believes has been given undue publicity to the PRTT boss. The fact of the matter is that by virtue of the job he is doing today, Maina has become a news maker. Whatever he does in the course of his assignment is news and he does not need to give the press sacks of money as Mark insinuated before he is covered. As Senate President does Mark give the press that kind of money before his activities are reported?  Hear him: ‘’First, for those of you who have been following Maina; he bought over the entire press…’’ Haba, Mr Senate President, were you there when he bought the press? How much did he pay the press?

    As a top public officer, Mark should weigh his words before he speaks. He is condemning Maina for making wild allegations against the Senate, yet he is doing the‘same against the press. The issue is, however, not the way he spoke but the problem Maina has got himself into. It has been over a week now since Mark drew the battle-line with the Presidency over Maina. Where is Maina? The police that declared him wanted don’t seem to know. Maina is swimming in trouble: the Senate is after him; so are the police and his employers. He risks being sacked for alleged abscondment.

    Whether Maina is sacked or not will not remove any hair off the people’s skin. We are, however, interested in the outcome of the work of his task team. He should be given an opportunity to submit the team’s report if it is ready before he is punished for the offence(s) he has committed. We should not throw away the baby with the bathwater. Let Maina finish his job before paying the price for his excesses.

     

    CORRECTION

    Joseph Stalin was Soviet leader and not a German general as reported here last week.

     

  • Reps back Senate on Maina’s sack

    Reps back Senate on Maina’s sack

    he House of Representatives yesterday backed the Senate in its call for the sack of the Chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team (PRTT) Abdulrasheed Maina.

    The House ordered the Inspector-General of Police, Alhaji Mohammed Abubakar, to appear before the Committee on Police Affairs to give reasons why he did not act on the warrant issued by the Senate.

    The lawmakers defied picketing by over a thousand sacked National Identity Card Management Commission ( NIMC) to attend plenary yesterday.

    The Senate on February 13 passed resolutions requesting that Maina be dismissed from the public service and that he should be disengaged from the acts relating to the public.

    The posture of the House yesterday was surprisingly at variance with an earlier position of its Committee on Pension, headed by Ibrahim Bawa Kamba, which at the onset of the face-off between the Senate and Maina flayed the Senate report and urged President Goodluck Jonathan to give Maina more protection to carry out the pension reforms in MDAs and parastatals.

    The resolution of the House yesterday was sequel to the adoption of the prayer of a motion moved under Matters of Urgent National Importance, by the Chairman of the House Committee on Rules and Business, Albert Sam-Tsokwa.

    Tsokwa, while presenting the motion, said it sought the concurrence with the earlier resolution of the Senate, which sought the dismissal of Maina.

    “Maina has been having a running battle with the Senate on the issue of pension. The committee had summoned Maina to appear several times, but he refused,” the lawmaker said, adding that there is need to present a united front to uphold the integrity of the parliament.

    “It is a constitutional responsibility that the resolutions that should carry the weigt of the law should be agreed to by the two chambers,” he added.

    According to him, the step taken by the House would send a strong signal to the executive arm of the government to stop impunity and disregard for due process in the conduct of government business.

    The Minority Leader of the House, Femi Gbajabiamila (ACN-Lagos), while supporting the motion, noted that the House was not transgressing on the powers of the executive by requesting the sack of Maina, but asking it to act.

    “A constitution that has no efficacy is no law. It’s a useless provision. There are provisions here that give us the power to recommend as in Section 5 of the constitution,” he said.

    Another member, Abike Dabiri-Erewa (ACN-Lagos), said there was no need to beg the executive to do its job and that the joint resolution should send a message to those allegedly protecting Maina.

    “It’s only in this country that such things can happen. Even if he’s not guilty, he must show up to answer the allegations against him. The resolution has the force of law and must we beg the executive to do its job? If Maina is not found, the Head of Service must lose his job.”

    A lawmaker, Bitrus Kaze, expressed surprise that “it has to take a resolution of the National Assembly for a person to be disciplined and the executive arm has no interest in doing such. It shows the National Assembly can’t bite.”

    Samson Osagie (ACN-Edo) alleged that the executive arm of government had continued to ignore the resolutions of the National Assembly even when the workers of the affected organisations had protested against their management

    Other members like Forte Dike (PDP- Anambra) and Aminu Suleiman (PDP-Kano) agreed that the legislature was constitutionally empowered to do what it was doing concerning Maina since he was being protected and shielded from arrest by people in high places.