Tag: Majority

  • Niger APC sacks majority leader

    Niger APC sacks majority leader

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Niger State has removed Majority Leader of the House of Assembly, Ibrahim Dandodo.

    Dandodo, who represents Rijau Constituency, will be replaced with Nura Garba (Kontagora I).

    The sack was contained in a letter to the Assembly, where the party requested it to recognise Dandodo’s removal.

    However, some lawmakers have resisted this move, saying only lawmakers have the powers to elect their leaders.

    This development  has caused a cold war between the party leadership and lawmakers, as the party threatened to deny them tickets in 2019 if they refuse to act upon the letter.

    The lawmakers are standing on the House of Assembly Standing Order, Page 6, which states that the election of the Speaker and his deputy is the responsibility of members, while the rules of the House gives power to lawmakers to select their leaders.

    A lawmaker, who pleaded for anonymity, confirmed the receipt of the letter.

    He said the APC lawmakers were neither consulted nor involved in the decision.

    Efforts to get party’s secretary, Mohammed Liman, to comment were unsuccessful.

  • Dogara overrules majority on pro-Biafra debate

    SPEAKER of the House of Representatives Yakubu Dogara yesterday ruled against the majority, which did not want  the pro-Biafra agitation debated.

    Dogara said such sensitive subjects could not be swept under the carpet, considering the unfolding events associated with it.

    But many members voted against debating the matter when it was put to a voice vote.

    Although there were fewer legislators, who wanted the matter discussed, Dogara decided to go with the minority.

    The drama began when Sunday Karimi (PDP, Kogi)  introduced the motion on the need to debate the call for violence by the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), as a matter of urgent public importance.

    He said the motion was not listed on the previous order paper.

    Many legislators felt the motion was not urgent enough to be debated, but the ‘ayes’ as usual had it, as the Speaker overruled the ‘nays’, who did not want a debate.

    The second leg of the question on whether rules be stepped down for the motion to be taken was also met with ‘nays’.

    The Speaker ruled again against the nays and said the motion would be taken on the next legislative day, since the sponsor was travelling today.

  • Gbajabiamila is House Leader

    Gbajabiamila is House Leader

    •Dogara bows to Buhari, APC

    Party supremacy advocates yesterday carried the day, with Femi Gbajabiamila becoming the Majority Leader of the House of Representatives.

    The sharing of offices in the House had be contentious. It all ended peacefully as Speaker Yakubu Dogara announced Gbajabiamila the Majority Leader – in deference to President Muhammadu Buhari and the All Progressives Congress(APC).

    Dogara, by accepting the party’s list, opted for peace than a prolonged crisis in the House.

    But, instead of riding his colleagues roughshod, Dogara allowed the caucuses of the APC to have input in the choice of principal officers.

    The horse-trading ran late into the wee hours of yesterday but all the factions accepted to bury the hatchets in the interest of the party’s success.

    Six factors accounted for the resolution of the crisis in the House, The Nation learnt.

    A member of the House listed the factors as follows:

    • the Buhari 20-minute intervention on Monday night;
    • follow-up intervention by the party leadership after the session with Buhari;
    • Dogara’s design of a consensus formula;
    • the need to compensate Gbajabiamila for his role as opposition leader in the House for eight years and in  making APC a reality;
    • Reps were crisis-weary; and
    • the need to save the nation’s democracy because the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was trying to capitalise on the crisis to derail Buhari’s administration.

    The source said: “Dogara and APC members were moved by Buhari’s 20-minute appeal. We saw a President who was wearied that we were not united and Dogara seized the moment. He abandoned all prejudices to put the nation and the survival of APC first.

    “I think Dogara has tremendous respect for Buhari and he decided to be his own man to defer to the President and APC. He kept on asking, without the party, would I have been here? What is so difficult that we cannot resolve?

    “That meeting at the Presidential Villa changed the mood of the warring factions in the House.”

    It was also gathered that Dogara was moved by the APC Chairman John Odidie-Oyegun and APC Follow-up Committee. He could not fathom why the elderly ones were begging him, it was learnt.

    According to sources, shortly after the session between Buhari and APC members in the House on Monday, the party raised a four-man ad hoc committee to follow up on the President’s mandate –  that the party’s stand must prevail.

    Members of the committee are Odigie-Oyegun, the National Secretary, Mai Mala Buni, the National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed and the National Vice-Chairman, Northeast, Mr. B.B. Lawal.

    A source in the committee said: “We had a meeting with the Speaker and Deputy Speaker Lasun Yusuf. We also had a separate session with Femi Gbajabiamila.

    “The atmosphere was somber and the two groups agreed to harmonise their positions. They said we should allow the zonal caucuses to elect their leaders.

    “They all respected the meeting we had with the President on party supremacy. They said for Buhari to intervene, the crisis was getting out of hand.”

    The party source added: “There was intense horse-trading till the wee hours of Tuesday morning when the factions in the House agreed to move forward.

    “There were signs too that members of APC in the House were tired of the crisis. They saw the signs that the PDP was already capitalising on the gridlock to cripple the administration of Buhari.

    “They noticed that at the rate the crisis was going, it could derail the nation’s democracy. So, wise counsel prevailed and members chose to sheathe their swords.”

    The National Secretary of APC told our correspondent that the APC committee brokered truce among its members in the House. “It is a welcome development. We are impressed that they respected the party and affirmed the supremacy of the party,” he said, adding:

    “This has confirmed that we are one family. It is a clear manifestation that we can unite for the sake of the nation.

    “The case of the Senate will be addressed; it would soon be sorted out. We are equally expecting them to respect the position of the party as well.”

    The Chairman of the House Ad-hoc Committee on Information, Mallam Sanni Zorro, who spoke last night with our correspondent, said: “It was the triumph of democracy, the House is the winner. The House has demonstrated political maturity because politics is about give-and-take.

    “President Buhari is not only a leader but a game changer. Since 1999, past Presidents had always installed the leaders of the National Assembly but President Buhari decided not to interfere.

    “There was pressure on him to interfere but he refused. It was only when the crisis got to a critical stage that he intervened. Yet, he did not impose his will. The party also did not use force.”

    Zorro praised the Speaker for championing peace in the House.

    He added: “To resolve the crisis, Dogara came up with a final consensus formula which took into consideration the interest of critical stakeholders including the nation, the presidency, regional politics, zoning and all those things that divided members.

    “It is a win-win situation. There was no winner, no loser. With the crisis amicably resolved, the House is now open for business, legislative activities and engagement with public, private and non-governmental actors.”

     

  • Osunkeye seeks review of rule on exclusion  of majority shareholders

    Osunkeye seeks review of rule on exclusion of majority shareholders

    Boardroom mogul and Chair-man, Lafarge Africa Plc, Chief Olusegun Osunkeye, has called for a review of rules by the capital market authorities, which excludes majority core investor in a company from voting its shares in favour of any major corporate decision, warning that such rule will have serious unintended consequences on the growth and development of the capital market.

    Osunkeye, who has served on the boards of not less than five quoted companies over three and a half decades and recently retired as chairman  of Nestle Nigeria Plc and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Nigeria (GSK) Plc, spoke at a workshop organised by the Independent Shareholders Association of Nigeria (ISAN) and PR Plus in Lagos.

    According to him, the rules on exclusion of core investors from voting would be counterproductive to current efforts at wooing foreign and indigenous entrepreneurs to list their companies on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) while the growth of existing listed companies may be stifled by minority consideration for immediate profit.

    Rules by the NSE and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) exclude the core investor, all related and interested parties, entities, associates and proxies from exercising their voting rights, even where they hold fully-paid shares.

    The rules by capital market regulators represent major paradigm shift from the previous practice where such excluded persons and entities are allowed to exercise their voting rights and runs contrary to the general principle of one share or unit, one vote.

    “I think this rule could give rise to unintended consequences, because we should bear in mind the level of our socio-economic development as a country, the sophistication of the market structure and the players in that market,” Osunkeye said.

    Citing that the stock market is dominated by foreign portfolio investors whose main investment objective could be short-term gains and the dispersal of minority shareholdings, he noted that foreign minority shareholders with intent on short-term gain could hide under such rules to thwart a long-term corporate development plan with potential for several long-term benefits for the economy but immediate constraint to dividend distribution.

    He said such rule that bars majority shareholder from voting its shares would expose entrepreneurs to undue influences of portfolio speculators and fund managers whose interests may not be in tandem with the long-term growth plan of the company.

    “I do not believe that it is the intention of the rule-makers to emasculate corporate democracy, facilitate a tyranny of the minority against the majority. The rule could deter listing on the Exchange by businesses, particularly Nigerian entrepreneurs, who have concentrated ownership, for fear of losing the right to participate in the decision making process of the business enterprise they have laboured so hard to nurture with respect to such transactions. I am of the opinion that the unintended consequence of the rules would be to discourage listings by private companies who would otherwise thrive as publicly quoted companies,” Osunkeye said.

    According to him, while it is true that the interests of institutional investors may not always coincide, it is also true that the interests of foreign portfolio investors are not often the same as domestic institutional or retail investors.

    He added that the retail domestic minority shareholders are widely dispersed, with some 100,000 shareholders holding as little as 6.5 per cent of a company, to have any meaningful restrain on speculative portfolio managers that are against long-term corporate and national interests.

    He decried the situation where changes are made in legislation and policies without adequate consultation with the stakeholders, especially the operating companies which may be affected by such changes or punitive exercise of power by a regulatory body.

    He urged shareholders’ associations to be advocates against laws and regulations that are inimical to business and investment growth noting that shareholders need to appreciate that operating environment usually affect the performance of the board and management.

    According to him, shareholders through their associations should have the goal of improving their companies. Shareholders activism should be channeled towards ensuring the viability and sustainability of the public companies they own, and in the process, seek to influence board and management through collaboration rather than antagonising board members.

    “The interest of shareholders is also well served when they show consciousness and understanding for social and corporate responsibility towards other stakeholders, and the society at large. I also plead that regulatory bodies should reflect that rules and regulations may sometimes need to be adapted to suit the needs and stage of socio-economic and business development of our country,” Osunkeye concluded.

    With such majority-shareholder barring rule, it means that foreign and Nigerian majority shareholders, such as Alhaji Aliko Dangote, who owns majority equity stakes in Dangote Cement and Dangote Sugar Refinery; and Nestle SA, which owns controlling equity stake in Nestle Nigeria Plc, will not be able to vote on major corporate decisions affecting their companies.

    With the exception of GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Nigeria and Julius Berger Nigeria Plc, which hold less than majority shareholdings, other foreign investors hold more than 50 per cent controlling majority equity stakes. The foreign investors are spread across dominant sectors  with large concentration in the fast moving consumer goods (FMCGs) sector.

    These major multinationals include Unilever Plc, GlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom (GSK UK) Plc, PZ Cussons, Nestle SA, Lafarge SA, Heineken NV, Mondelçz International, Berger Bilfinger, BOC Holdings, Standard Bank Group, Leventis, Total SA, Mobil Oil Corporation, Siat NV, Affelka SA, Greif International Holdings B.V., United States’ Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and SAB Miller.

    Other Nigerian individual and institutional investors that may be affected included UAC of Nigeria, Vitafoam Nigeria, Dr. Oba Otudeko and Mr. Femi Otedola.

     

  • Congress majority rejects Maigari’s impeachment

    Congress majority rejects Maigari’s impeachment

    A majority of the general assembly of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has rejected the impeachment of Aminu Maigari as president of the federation.

    A total of 26 state FA chairmen, who make up more than 50% of the 44-member congress and comply with requirements of Article 24 of NFF statutes, at a pre-general assembly resolved in a seven-page document made available to reporters that Maigari remains president of the NFF and he should immediately return to office.

    “That the undersigned having constituted more than 50%+1 of the members of the general assembly (as required by the NFF statutes for taking valid decisions at the congress) and in view of the mathematical impossibility of the remaining members to ratify the alleged dismissal pursuant to the NFF statutes, the President should immediately return to his desk and continue as President of the NFF until after the elective congress of Tuesday, 26th August, 2014,” read part of the resolutions.

    The FA chiefs said Maigari’s purported dismissal did not follow laid down procedures.

    They also declared that allegations of financial misappropriation, misapplication and maladministration against Maigari are unproven as the audited accounts of the NFF for the past three years were never queried in the last three annual assemblies.

    An extraordinary congress slated for Abuja on Thursday, which was to endorse Maigari’s impeachment, was on Wednesday shelved by the NFF executive committee due to what an official statement said were “unforeseen circumstances”.

    However, it is believed that the extraordinary congress was put off because those against Maigari “did not have the numbers” at the congress.

    The Abuja hotel where a majority of the congress put up ahead of the extraordinary assembly was Thursday sealed off by Nigeria security operatives as guests were barred from receiving any visitors.

    And as at press time, Maigari has been invited by the director of the State Security Service.

    Nigeria was recently suspended by FIFA after the country’s sports minister appointed a caretaker administrator for the NFF.

    Elections to the executive committee of the NFF are to be conducted on August 26.

     

  • Newswatch: Directors fault Ibrahim’s claim to majority stake ownership

    Four directors of the troubled news magazine, Newswatch, have faulted claims by businessman Jimoh Ibrahim that he has legitimately acquired majority shares in the company.

    They also denied the businessman’s claim that they were no longer directors of the company.

    Ray Ekpu, Dan Agbese, Yakubu Mohammed and Soji Akinrinade, in a counter-affidavit in response to a suit filed by Ibrahim, said Ibrahim has consistently misrepresented facts in his claim to the ownership of the company.

    They admitted that parties actually entered a share purchase agreement.

    They faulted Ibrahim’s claim that he has acquired the company, contending that he and his company, Global Media Mirror Limited (GMML), failed to perform their obligations under the agreement.

    The directors accused Ibrahim of subverting the actual intention of parties to the agreement, alleging that he has not demonstrated any intention of growing the company, but rather has engaged in stripping its assets.

    They averred in the affidavit that by the agreement, Ibrahim and his company were required to pay N510million before May 5 last year, before they could take over the board of Newswatch and its management.

    The directors stated that Ibrahim and GMML failed to meet the requirement by May 5, but instead caused the money to be transferred on May 9 from “the account of another company – NICON Investment Limited – into a new account that he (the second plaintiff) had opened in the name of the first plaintiff (Newswatch Communications Ltd) without any board resolution of the first plaintiff and in respect of which he was the sole signatory.”

    They admitted resigning as executive directors at the completion meeting of May 5 last year, but that they were reappointed as non-executive directors, a development which explained why the magazine continued to retain their names as directors after the meeting.

    They denied Ibrahim’s claim that an Annual General Meeting of the company was held on August 20 this year. “We state categorically that Form CAC 7 filed at the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) as well as Form CAC 2 and Form CAC 2.1 attached to the plaintiffs’ affidavit are contrived by the second and third plaintiffs (Ibrahim and GMML) as there was no meeting of the first plantiff (Newswatch) at all to that effect.”

    They stated that rather than perform their obligations under the agreement that would have enabled them take over the company as majority shareholders, Ibrahim and GMML allegedly hijacked the company to themselves and want to use the court to legalise their illegal actions.

    The directors have also filed a notice of preliminary objection to the suit.

    They argued that the suit disclosed no reasonable cause of action against them; that Ibrahim and his company do not have the authorisation of the first plaintiff to sue.

    Ibrahim is, by the suit, seeking to strip the four directors of their status and prevent them from declaring a trade dispute between him(with 51 percent stake) and the remaining shareholders (with 49 per cent stake).

    Justice Okon Abang has fixed hearing in the suit for December 3.

  • Gunmen attack Benue Majority Leader

    Gunmen, suspected to be assassins, have attacked the Majority Leader of the Benue State House of Assembly, Paul Biam.

    The gunmen reportedly ambushed the lawmaker on the Zaki Biam-Katsina-Ala Road. They shut at his Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV).

    Biam represents Ukum Constituency in the Assembly.

    Addressing reporters yesterday in Makurdi, the state capital, the lawmaker said his assailants were about 30.

    He said hoodlums had earlier disrupted a meeting of the Ukum Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) stakeholders in the home of the chairman of Ukum Local Government Area, Terfa Bosua.

    According to him, the thugs damaged some vehicles and injured those at the meeting.

    Biam said he was heading to Makurdi from Zaki Biam when the gunmen, who were on two motorcycles, trailed him to Ankya village, a suburb of Zaki Biam, and opened fire at his vehicle.

    He said: “As my vehicle approached Ankya village on the Zaki Biam-Katsina-Ala Road, four gunmen on two motorcycles, appeared from the bush and shot sporadically at my SUV, with the intention to assassinate me.”

    The lawmaker explained that he wanted a particular candidate to become the Caretaker Chairman of Ukum Local Government Area.

    He said this did not go down well with those he described as his enemies.

    Biam said he might have been attacked for backing the candidate.

    As at yesterday afternoon, the lawmaker said he was yet to report the matter to the police.