Tag: Malami

  • FG seeks businessman’s extradition over $.71m fraud

    FG seeks businessman’s extradition over $.71m fraud

    The Federal Government has requested the extradition of a United States- based Nigerian, Jim-Daniels Nnah, who was accused of defrauding two companies of $712,000 approximately N261.3 million.

    The request was contained in a letter marked HAGF/Ext/08/14 from the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) addressed to the U.S Department of Justice, Washington DC.

    The extradition request is coming four years after Nnah through his company, Biowish TM Africa Limited allegedly fleeced Environ-Aid Technologies Nigeria Limited and Alsa Logistics Limited of the sum under the pretence of giving them sole distributorship rights of some bio-chemicals.

    Made pursuant to the provisions of the extradition treaty between the governments of U.S and United Kingdom in December 22, 1931, which is applicable to Nigeria, the request was signed by the AGF, Abubakar Malami (SAN).

    Giving facts of the case, Malami said Nnah obtained the money for the purpose of supplying the complainants with products made by Biowish Technologies Inc., USA.

    He said the complainants alleged that the suspect neglected or refused to supply the products and therefore has stolen or converted the money to his personal use.

    Malami said by his alleged action, the suspect deprived the complainants of their money and the goods despite several efforts to recover the property or money.

    He said: “The complainants claimed that sometime in September 2012, their companies entered in an existing joint venture agreement with Biowish Technologies Inc., 150N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2800, Chicago, Illinois 60601, USA, to supply its products in Africa.

    “For Biowish Technologies products to be sold in Africa, Jim Daniels-Nnah incorporated Biowish TM Africa to market a variety of the products ranging from Biowosh-Aqua, Biowish Odor, Biowish Remediation, Biowish Crops (fertiliser), etc.

    “Relying on the information provided by the suspect, the complainant entered into separate agreements with Biowish TM Africa Limited to procure Biowosh Technologies’ products for which the sum of $712,000 was paid into Jim Daniels-Nnah’s company, Biowish TM Africa Limited and IC&T America Inc.’s offshore accounts numbers 2531597994 and 2513861179 at BBVA Compass Bank, Houston Texas, respectively at different times.

    “Unknown to the complainants, Jim Daniels-Nnah has signed two separate identical contract noted making each of the two companies the sole distributor of the same products in Nigeria, demonstrating fraud and insincerity in handling the whole transaction.”

     

  • Malami and anti-graft agencies

    Of all the vote-catching strategies laid out by the ruling All Progressives Congress in the lead up to the 2015 general elections, its promise to prosecute an all-out war against corruption was unquestionably the most compelling and believable. This is because its presidential candidate, Muhammadu Buhari, is widely known as a man of integrity with very strong aversion for corrupt practices.

    And so, due largely to its promise to fight corruption to a standstill and the credibility of the personality behind the pledge, APC was able to seize the mantle from the old guards of corruption and form a new government. Therefore, to refer to Buhari’s government as one of anti-corruption – one hoping to hinge its success in governance on how well it performs in this specific assignment – would not be out of place.

    To this administration’s credit, the last two years, or at least since one doughty, no-nonsense police officer named Ibrahim Magu became acting chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the anti-corruption war has been waged in a manner that has never been seen in the history of Nigeria.

    Amazing loads upon loads of stolen public funds in various currencies are being recovered and returned to government coffers. Thanks to the whistle-blower initiative, more and more disclosures about the hidden loots are being made to the relevant agencies. And unlike what obtained in the past, the big guns of society, hitherto untouchable, are regularly being hauled to the law courts on account of fraudulent activities. But as yet, no conviction of note has been recorded.

    As can be seen, it’s not been an easy fight. Corruption is refusing to be subdued. Government has lost some high-profile cases, while some others are stalemated. Cynics contend that failure to secure notable convictions is proof that government is shoddy in the way it is prosecuting the war; government officials counter that corruption is fighting back in a virulent manner.

    In a way, both are correct. While those who have made corruption a lifetime occupation won’t give up easily, it is also true that this administration routinely shoots itself in the foot as far as the anti-corruption campaign is concerned. Take for example, the unhealthy relationship between the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, and anti-corruption agencies like the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

    Sensing that it is being overshadowed by the two agencies, the AGF is angling to show its muscle as the pre-eminent government department in all matters legal, and especially as far as prosecuting corruption cases is concerned. Okoi Obono-Obla, Special Assistant to the President on Prosecutions, man Friday and agent provocateur, is the arrowhead in this needless exercise of power that is clearly aimed at meeting some self-serving political ends. At every given opportunity, Obono-Obla does not fail to reiterate the fable that the anti-corruption agencies are not co-operating with the office of the AGF. But the more likely position, in the assessment of many observers, is that these agencies are not willing to compromise in some high-profile cases in which the office of the AGF might be interested.

    That is why it is widely believed that other than crude, selfish politics, there can be no legitimate reason for the AGF’s latest threat, as conveyed by Obono-Obla, to report the heads of EFCC and ICPC to the presidency for refusing to hand over the case files of more than 35 former governors and senators. It is important to ask why the AGF wants these files. Why won’t he simply invite these agencies to a meeting to update him on the cases, and then explore ways of assisting in achieving diligent prosecution?

    No one is disputing the AGF’s status as the numero uno in the circumstance, but he should refrain from bearing down on these agencies as though they don’t have a statutory mandate to perform certain roles corresponding with his. To paraphrase a local proverb, the sky is wide enough for every bird to flap its wings.

    Instead of requesting cases started by other agencies, the AGF should initiate his own high-profile cases too to show that it not only barks but bites as well. Obono-Obla has accused the agencies of slowing down the anti-corruption war. Well, he has to show concrete proof of how this is happening before the charge can hold water, not by merely pointing to a refusal of the agencies to turn in files of the corruption cases they initiated.

    In any case the last time anyone heard of one group of government official publicly expressing misgivings about the other, it was one prominent member of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), also a senior Advocate of Nigeria, berating Obono-Obla’s boss for openly disagreeing with acting President Yemi Osinbajo on the retention of Magu as the chair of EFCC.

    This individual stopped short of calling for the AGF’s sack. Before then, this same member and another articulate colleague at a forum on corruption organized in Abuja by the Pyrates Confraternity, separately pronounced doubts about the commitment of the AGF to the anti-corruption efforts of the government on account of serial embarrassing defeats handed the government in key cases prosecuted by his office.

    The AGF should rather strive to allay the fears of the public and restore confidence in his office, not perpetually bicker with other agencies over cases he didn’t originate.

     

    • Onyeacholem is a journalist. He can be reached on gonyeacholem@gmail.com
  • No rift between OAGF and EFCC – Malami

    No rift between OAGF and EFCC – Malami

    The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), said on Thursday there is no rift between his office and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Malami stated this during chat with journalists in Abuja.

    The AGF, who was asked if a letter he wrote to the EFCC over prosecution of high profile cases was causing rift between both offices, simply said “there is no rift”.

    He said the press briefing, which was on the first ever National Summit on Justice in the country, was to enable stakeholders harmonise various reforms in the justice sector.

    Malami said: “The summit is expected to bring together stakeholders in the justice sector to consider, adopt and validate the draft National Policy on Justice developed by a technical committee constituted by the Ministry of Justice in 2016.

    “Given the challenges militating against an effective administration of justice and the peculiarity of our federal system, there is the need to harmonise and integrate the various reform initiatives into a clearly articulated National Justice Policy.”

    The summit which starts on August 8 is will be declared open by Acting President Yemi Osinbajo

    Other participants are the Attorneys-General, Solicitors-General, Chief Judges of all the 36 states of the federation and the Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

     

     

  • ‘Criticism against Buhari’s anti-graft war unfair’

    ‘Criticism against Buhari’s anti-graft war unfair’

    An Ijaw Chief, Wilfred Ogbotobo, on Tuesday condemned the criticisms against President Muhammadu Buhari’s anti-graft war and the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN).

    Describing such criticisms as unfair, the Ijaw chief said it was impossible for the Federal Government to eradicate corruption overnight.

    Speaking in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Ogbotobo, who hails from Nembe Kingdom, said most of the expectations of the critics could only materialize in dictatorship and not in democracy that required rule of law and due process.

    He said the treasury looters were also spending such money to manipulate citizens to frustrate anti- graft war.

    He said: “I don’t think it is fair to say the war against corruption is slowing down. The fact is that Nigerians want to see actions daily. They want to physically see the looted billions hauled in cash, in cash not stories, and the culprits arrested, chained and thrown into jails.

    “These include mostly high ranking former office holders including past heads of state. They want to hear the names of the criminals mentioned. Unfortunately, it can’t be done that way all the time. This is a democracy where rule of law is paramount. It is not a military dictatorship.

    “We should also realize that we are contending with a leviathan that had been with us since independence, successfully poisoned more than three quarters of our national life and effectively crippled our national psyche. A monster whose venomous tentacles permeate all facets of our institutions and hierarchies of our society.

    “In a way it has the foundation of our corporate existence on its tentacles which it can threaten at will. This is the challenge we have before us. So fighting Nigeria’s brand of corruption is akin to challenging the very existence of the country. And I believe this is already manifesting glaringly, so I’m not hypothesizing.

    “I believe there are points where outwardly the momentum would appear slow or actually slow down due to the ramifications, weight or depth of the issues concerned at that particular point.

    “We must understand that. This shouldn’t be misconstrued as an ebb or a weakening in the fight against corruption. Not at all.”

    Ogbotobo said it was also unfair to challenge the competence and commitment of Malami to the anti-corruption crusade.

    He said Malami came from a lineage in the APC, where the anti-graft campaign of the administration originated and would not shirk in discharging his responsibilities.

    He added: “I think the President found him competent, stable and reliable before choosing him as the point man on this very crucial responsibility which, arguably, is the signature of this administration.

    “Malami is a lawyers’ lawyer. He understands the sensitivity of the challenge and I believe he has been very successful.

    “In a way, this can be attested to by the robust international collaboration complementing our efforts and thereby drawing respect and support to Nigeria’s anti-corruption fight, from serious nations across the world.”

  • Malami: Anti-graft war on course

    The Federal Government has put in place sufficient measures to curb corruption and impunity, Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami (SAN) has said.

    He said the Muhammadu Buhari administration has in the last two years taken steps to ensure the recovery and repatriation of loot hidden in foreign countries.

    Malami spoke in Abuja at the opening session of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) peer review of Nigeria by Myanmar and Cote D’Ivoire.

    The Attorney-General, who was emphatic that the government has done a lot in the area of corruption prevention, said: “This government has undertaken preventive measures against corrupt practices and has put a lot of efforts in the recovery of looted, carted and stashed asset both home and abroad.

    “In the fight against corruption, Nigeria has put in place various policies with a view to ensuring sanity in the various sectors. These policies include amongst others the National Policy on Justice Sector Reform, the National Policy on Bureau of Public Service Reforms; and, recently, the National Anti-Corruption Strategy was validated and adopted and it is in the process of receiving approval of the Federal Executive Council in order to perfect it as a working document.”

    “The two chapters under review in this second cycle, that is Chapters 2 and 5 (Preventive Measures and Asset Recovery) are key areas of focus of the current administration of President Muhammadu Buhari, who remains committed to the fight against corruption,” Malami said.

    UNCAC’s focal person, Tukur Modibbo, said the fight against corruption was crucial in any democratic process, adding that it is also important to development issues.

    Modibo, who noted that corruption was capable of denying the people access to good governance and democratic dividends, called for a concerted effort against corruption because, particularly in the public sector.

    He said the review process, though done in line with the UNCAC’s requirements, is to see Nigeria’s level of compliance with certain global best practices as far as institutional framework and implementation are concern.

    Modibo said the benefits of the review is mutual and non-adversarial, so that countries could be rated but does not mean that, is to apply sanctions but meant to share mutual experience and the core observation of the lapses in each other’s system.

    The Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Jennifer Sarvary Bradford said fighting corruption requires a lot of efforts and perseverance.

  • Osinbajo, Malami, Magu, DSS move to save anti-graft war

    Osinbajo, Malami, Magu, DSS move to save anti-graft war

    • FG seeks water-tight prosecution of corrupt elements
    • Fresh prosecution strategy adopted

    The Federal Government has gone back to the drawing board to re-strategize on its prosecution of corruption-related cases.

    This followed its recent losses, one after the other, of four high profile corruption-related cases in court.

    First was the unfreezing, on the order of a Federal High Court, Lagos, of the account of Lagos lawyer Mike Ozekhome (SAN),  which is said to hold a sum of N75million professional fee paid to him by Governor Ayo Fayose of Ekiti State.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had alleged that the money was proceeds of corruption.

    Next was the discharge and acquittal of Justice Adeniyi Ademola and his wife of charges of corruption and possession of firearms filed against them.

    The initial forfeiture of a sum of $5m found in an account of former First Lady, Dame Patience Jonathan was similarly reversed on the order of another court, while the Minister of Niger Delta in the Jonathan administration, Elder Godsday Orubebe was also discharged and acquitted after Abubakar Malami, the Attorney General of the federation, told the   Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) that the case filed against the former minister did not exist.

    The ICPC had accused him of diverting N1.97 billion meant for the compensation of owners of property on the Eket Urban section of the East-West road in Eket, Akwa Ibom State.

    It was gathered that government was shocked by the development which it perceived as a terrible blow to its anti-corruption crusade.

    Vice President Yemi Osinbajo at the weekend met with the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mallam Abubakar Malami and heads of other prosecuting agencies on the situation.

    These are the Director-General of the Department of State Security Service (DSS), Mr. Lawan Daura, Acting Chairman of EFCC, Mr. Ibrahim Magu, Chairman, Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), Mr. Sam Saba.

    Although the Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Mr. Ekpo Nta was away on official assignment, the agency was represented.

    Osinbajo directed the agencies to henceforth ensure a water-tight prosecution of corruption suspects.

    He also asked the heads of the agencies to cooperate with the bench in handling all such matters.

    Government, sources said, was disturbed that vital cases were lost on technical grounds to some suspects.

    A highly-placed source said: “Losing four or five high profile cases in quick succession was seen as a setback for the anti-graft war.

    “As a Professor of Law of Evidence, Osinbajo had a review session with all the heads of prosecuting agencies on what technically went wrong on some of these cases.

    “Although the government has filed appeal on the rulings of the affected courts, the VP stepped in to arrest the slide.

    “The heads of the agencies have been directed to ensure diligent investigation, water-tight prosecution and place sufficient evidence before the court.

    “All constraints affecting the legal team will be addressed accordingly.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “The VP asked the agencies to collaborate among themselves instead of petty rivalry.

    “He also told them to cooperate with the bench on all matters before the court.”

    A top source said: “The presidency will now take more than a passing interest in all anti-graft cases. There will be effective monitoring and constant review.

    “Save the case of former Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, Mr. Godsday Orubebe, the government will file appeal against most of the rulings of the court on the lost cases.”

  • Corruption: Buhari to issue executive order on transparency in govt soon, says Malami

    Corruption: Buhari to issue executive order on transparency in govt soon, says Malami

    President Muhammadu Buhari will soon sign an executive order on transparency and efficiency in government, it was learnt yesterday.

    It is all part of his anti-corruption campaign, Attorney-General and Justice Minister Abubakar Malami (SAN) said.

    Speaking at the the National Open Government Partnership retreat in Kaduna State, the Minister said: “Corruption remains one of the biggest impediments to national development. It is illegal and illegitimate. It concerns actions that are often clandestine and practices that those who pepertrate it always try to canceal.

    “Numerous scholars insist that many of the political, social and especially economic problems we face in Nigeria are still traceable to the problem of corruption.”

    Malami spoke about “the open government partnership” as “a multi stakeholders initiative focused on improving transparency accountability citizen participation and responsiveness to citizens  through technology and innovation”.

    OGP was formally launched in 2011 when the 8 founding governments – Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Norway, the Philippines, South Africa, the United Kingdom, among others, came together last July.

    The minister went on:

    “Let me reiterate that the FGN will continue to pursue reform programme on transparency and accountability through targeted measures based on the commitments that we have made to promote fiscal transparency open procurement open contracting access to information asset disclosure citizen engagement and empowerment.”

    He said despite “dwindling oil revenue, government is desirious to continue to provide an enabling environment to attract foreign investors in order to diversify the economy. President Buhari has made it clear that Nigeria is open for business and has assured the world that illicit finance will have no hiding place in our country.

    “In the coming weeks, the President will sign an executive order on promoting transparency and efficiency for the creation of an enabling business  environment in Nigeria that will mandate all ministries, agencies and department to adopt openness in contracting procedures and publishing of contracts.”

    Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, represented by his Deputy Barnabas Bala Bantex, said: “This government believes that the governance standards embodied in the Open Government Partnership are very helpful in advancing the implementation of transparent and result-oriented government.

    “In Kaduna State, we are cooperating with BudgIT on budget transparency, and everyone already knows that we insist on open competitive bidding for our contracts. Hardly a week passes without us publishing tenders in the newspapers. We have also established a platform for citizen engagement, with the Eyes and Ears project that confers on citizens the capacity to engage in real-time monitoring of our projects.”

    According to him, “these efforts towards open government are being acknowledged by our development partners”.

  • Malami and Kogi crisis

    Malami and Kogi crisis

    After procuring an interim government for the people of Kogi State, it would seem inevitable that President Buhari’s Attorney General and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami, SAN would go the extra mile to avail every prop to the contraption described as government strutting the Lugard House. After all, one of the established novelties about the current occupancy of the Kogi Government House is that the number one law officer, rather than the electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC (certainly not the electors ) – actually helped to bring it into being by its strange ‘advisory’ of midnight substitution!

    After perusing the letter by AGF Malami addressed to the Inspector General Police, Solomon Arase on the on-going crisis in my dear state, one needed to look no further to know who the piper calling the current tunes in the state is! The hand may appear like Esau’s; there can be no doubting that the voice is that of Jacob! The masquerade, finally, has been unmasked right in the market square.

    Months after, and with the substantive issues surrounding the so-called “inconclusive” elections that brought a ‘stranger’ to the APC ticket still unresolved by the nation’s courts, Nigerians would no doubt remember that it all started from one man’s unsolicited advisory.

    They would certainly remember that on November 21, 2015 Kogi voters had trooped out to vote to elect a new governor. And also that the poll returned 240,867 votes for the APC ticket of Abubakar Audu and James Abiodun Faleke and 199,415 for Idris Wada and Yomi Awoniyi of the Peoples Democratic Party.  And then, Audu died.

    That in a rather bizarre twist to an election that was as good as concluded, a vacillating INEC had declared the poll ‘inconclusive’ AFTER an ‘advisory’ from the nation’s chief law officer, Malami.

    Yes, Malami it was that decreed the substitution of the APC ticket, letting in all manners of opportunistic developments on which the destiny of the state and its people is now hung!

    First, it was Yahya Bello – a runner up in the APC governorship primary, pronounced candidate without a running mate. Then, an Audu/Faleke ticket ordinarily seen as good to go – with 240,867 votes –later declared ‘technically’ voided. And finally a governor riding into the gubernatorial mansion with barely 6,000 votes!

    Some have argued that the AGF’s initial intervention, against the run of equity and fair-play is what has plunged the state into the current crisis. They are probably right. But then, it is the courts that have the final say on the matter. The fact however is that neither the party – APC nor the government it purportedly gave birth, have known peace ever since that intervention hence the current situation in which the state is not only at war with itself but a governing party torn right through the middle. Presently, the state lawmakers are set upon themselves with a group of five lawmakers, supported by the executive, not only driving the majority – described as G-15 – out of town, but have since assumed the functions of the whole house!

    In a new twist, APC leaders in the state went for broke penultimate week: they passed a vote of no confidence on Governor, Yahya Bello in what marks a new phase in the fratricidal war.

    It may well be that the travesty currently playing out at the Kogi State House of Assembly is nothing novel. After all, in 2009, Ogun State, under former governor Gbenga Daniel saw a group of minority lawmakers not only sack the majority, but went as far as daring them to come near the precincts of the parliament building at the risk of lives or limbs! It also happened in Ekiti, where Governor Ayodele Fayose led a group of six renegade lawmakers to sack the majority of 19 lawmakers. It played out in Rivers State, where six members with the backing of former President Goodluck Jonathan and wife, Patience, took on 27 lawmakers while purporting to remove the elected speaker, Otelemaba Amachree.

    If we thought that such travesties and barefaced impunity was gone with the PDP administration, the spectacle playing out in Kogi and the curious intervention by the AGF would seem to indicate that nothing really has changed!

    The issue is of course whether both arms of the National Assembly acted right in taking over the state House of Assembly. On this, it is expected that opinions would be divided.  However, what is not in dispute is that the state legislature was factionalised; neither is there any contention that the activities of the members had gone beyond mere legislative bickering to constituting a grave threat to the peace of the state. Or that a minority, G-5 with the active support of the police and the governor, had created a situation in which the lawmaking business could only be strictly on their terms or perhaps such other terms as dictated by the conniving but floundering executive!

    Be that as it may, AGF Malami would have us know that there was no “sufficient legal basis” for the National Assembly to have taken over the lawmaking responsibilities of the state legislature. That “sufficient legal basis”, according to him, would only happen when the entire state is on fire!

    How about the AGF’s ‘consequential order’ that “the determination by the National Assembly that the alleged impeachment of the Speaker of the House of Assembly by ‘five members of the House of Assembly’ was ‘null and void’ was an exercise of judicial power by the Legislature, contrary to Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended)…?

    I thought the courts, rather than the AGF, held the power to review the actions of the National Assembly, including the executive branch!

    Or this – that the National Assembly’s description “of the alleged action of the Nigeria Police Force in purportedly providing protection for five persons as an act that was tantamount to ‘subverting the provision of the Constitution’ as matters of constitutionality that are issues for judicial determination”?

    Interesting times indeed!

    I am not a lawyer and so cannot claim to comprehend Malami’s specious jurisprudence. What is perhaps least expected is that the nation’s chief law officer would become a facilitator of the absurdity going on in the state. But even more worrisome is that the AGF has not proven to be an uninterested party in the sordid affair that has thrown the state into limbo.

    For me, last week’s mumbo jumbo by IG Arase is an eye opener; I can’t wait for the time when the AGF finally makes his appearance before the parliament he so derided. It promises to be an interesting encounter.

     

  • How to ensure success of anti-corruption war, by Sagay, Malami, others

    How to ensure success of anti-corruption war, by Sagay, Malami, others

    The Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee on Anti-corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay, President of the Court of Appeal (PCA) Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami ((SAN) and Chief Judge of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Justice Ishaq Bello, have identified how to ensure the success of government’s anti-corruption efforts.

    They argued that the anti-corruption war could only be successful, where the criminal justice system functions effectively to prevent abuses, delay and exploitation by criminals.

    They contended that for the nation’s criminal justice system to effectively function, there was the need for mutual cooperation and collaboration among institutions within the system and operators in the criminal justice sector.

    Sagay, Bulkachuwa, Malami and Bello spoke in Abuja yesterday during the inauguration of the Criminal Justice Monitoring Committee CJMC) at the opening of a training workshop for judges of the High Court of the FCT on the Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee on Anti-corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay said the implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015.

    Speakers were unanimous that if well applied, the ACJA, which aims to ensure speedy trial, would effectively eliminate existing challenges to criminal justice in the country.

    Sagay assured that the era, where looters of public funds manipulate the criminal justice system through delay, was over with the introduction of the ACJA 2015.

    He said a thorough understanding of the provisions of the Act and its effectively application by trial judges would allow the criminal justice system function to the benefit of all.

    “The administration of criminal justice system stands solidly as a pillar of democracy and the rule of law.  The ACJA is a revolution in the nation’s criminal justice system. The requirement (under the Act) that criminal cases be heard on a day-to-day basis will prevent instances, where preliminary issues in a criminal case goes from the trial court, through the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court.

    “By then, 10 years will pass by and witnesses would no longer be found, evidences are defused, prosecution fatigue would have set in; the case dies quietly and the suspect keeps his looted, but he/she is never found guilty or not guilty. That situation has been obviated by this Act,” Sagay said.

    He noted that one of its many benefits is the balance that it maintains between the interest of the individual, the people and the state.

    He added that “the provision for speedy trail process in the Act will ensure that no one deprives the state and the masses of the people their resources and their rights by fraudulently acquire property frustrating the trial process.”

    Justice Bulkachuwa, who inaugurated the ACJMC, said the committee, which is a creation of the AC JA, was important in ensuring the success of the ACJA.

    She said she has no doubt that the committee would deliver on its mandate.

    The President of the Court of Appeal expressed the hope that when the system is assessed in the next year, an appreciable success would have been achieved.

    Malami said the ACJA, by providing for the establishment of the monitoring committee, is a great step in the reformation of the nation’s criminal justice system.

    “There is need for widespread awareness on the application and operation of the ACJ Act for the purpose of achieving the desired benefits inherent in it. The formal inauguration of the committee is a reflection of the willingness of all to ensure the success of the ACJA.

    “At this juncture, we need to work together in whatever way we can to make sure that the monitoring of the Act is successful. It is about promoting the course of justice and we remain committed to be associated with that commitment,” Malami said.

    Bello stressed the need for an effective and independent justice administration system to ensure the sustenance of democracy, protection of people’s rights and the enthronement of the principle of the rule of law.

    “The essence of democracy is justice. Every democracy ought, therefore, to strive to provide access to justice for all and protect the rights of the citizenry.

    “The destiny of our country lies in making the system of justice well-rooted in the rule of law, so that Nigeria can continue to maintain its place of pride within the comity of nations, where justice delivery is guided by the law, oath of office and most importantly, the fear of God,” he said.

    Members of the ACJMC include the Chief Judge of the FCT (as Chairman), the AGF, the Inspector General of Police (IGP) or, the Comptroller General of Prisons (CGP), the Executive Secretary of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Chairman, Nigerian Bar Association (FCT), Director General of the Legal Aids Council and representatives of the civil society organisations.

  • Land case: Malami, Offor head for Supreme Court

    Abuja Electricity Distribution Company Chairman Shehu Malami and Chrome Group Chairman Emeka Offor have filed an appeal at the Supreme Court against the Court of Appeal’s verdict on a disputed property at Plot 1809, Asokoro, Abuja.

    The Court of Appeal had held that the property belongs to a Nigerian-American businessman, Mr. Imoakhuede Ohikhuare.

    Last May 28, it ruled that Ohikhuare was forcefully evicted from the property on September 12, 2012 through an unlawful execution of the judgment of an Abuja High Court, which transferred the property to Malami.

    Malami claimed at the Appeal Court that he sold the land in question and gave an irrevocable power of attorney to Offor in 2005 before he (Malami) instituted a case at the High Court in 2006. But, the Court of Appeal entered judgment against the elder statesman and Offor.

    The apex court adjourned the matter to May 17 due to the absence of the fourth respondent – former Minister of Transport, Alhaji Habibu Aliyu, who allegedly the property to Ohikhuare in 2006.

    Ohikhuare was said to have bought the land for N50 million, and built residential apartments valued at about N1 billion on it.

    According to him, for four years during which he occupied the land, Malami, Offor or their privies did not lay claims to the property.

    He was living with his family in the property when he was allegedly ejected with force from it on the basis of Justice Umar’s verdict which the Court of Appeal set aside.