Tag: man-made

  • Dubai to build $1.7b man-made islands Marsa  Al Arab by 2020

    Dubai to build $1.7b man-made islands Marsa Al Arab by 2020

    Dubai is growing again, and again. It’s building into the sea.

    Global investment company Dubai Holding has unveiled plans for Marsa Al Arab, a four million square feet pair of man-made islands either side of the Burj Al Arab Jumeirah, the city’s iconic sail-shaped hotel.

    The project, estimated to cost $1.72 billion, will add 1.4 miles of beach to Dubai’s coastline. With ground breaking scheduled for June, Dubai Holding say the islands will be completed late 2020.

    Geared towards tourists, one island will include family-friendly resorts, a 2.5 million square-foot marine park and a custom built 1,700-seat theater, home to the Middle East’s first Cirque du Soleil show. It will also house 300 seafront apartments.

    The second, private island is set to host 14- luxury villas and marina for residents, along with a boutique hotel.

    Marsa Al Arab will add 2,400 hotel rooms to the Jumeirah Group’s portfolio. The group is part of Dubai Holding, which is majority-owned by Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the Ruler of Dubai.

    Jumeriah Group have experience when it comes to man-made islands. They manage the Burj Al Arab, located 280 meters off Jumeirah Beach on artificial land first constructed in 1994.

    Other artificial islands of grander scale and logistical complexity have followed the Burj, with varying levels of success.

    Sea dredgers are used to create Dubai’s artificial islands.

    Sea dredgers are used to create Dubai’s artificial islands.

    Palm Jumeirah, 9.6-square miles and constructed between 2001 and 2006, is now home to hundreds of family residences and at least two dozen hotels.

    Palm Jebel Ali and Palm Deira are both set to eclipse the Jumeirah, but have suffered setbacks stemming from the global financial crisis of 2008. Construction of the former began in 2002 but it remains incomplete, while the latter, still in construction, has been scaled down and rebranded Deira Islands.

    Luxury 300-island system The World was constructed 2.5 miles off the Dubai coast between 2003 and 2008. Most islands were sold off to contractors to build private residences in 2008, but thus far the archipelago remains largely unoccupied.

    Jumeirah Group will be hoping Marsa Al Arab will avoid this fate, positioning the project as a tourist-friendly locale happy to host the influx of visitors expected to descend upon the city for Expo 2020.

  • Power sector problems man-made, says Fashola

    Power sector problems man-made, says Fashola

    Minister of Power, Works and Housing Babatunde Fashola said yesterday that the challenges of the power sector were man-made and not technical.

    Fashola stated this as a distinguished lecturer at the University of Lagos.

    The theme of the lecture, organised by the Department of Economics, was: “The power sector reform in Nigeria: Challenges and the way forward”.

    Fashola said there was no mystery in achieving stable and reliable electricity supply but that all stakeholders must conform to guidelines of the sector’s roadmap.

    He said the roadmap was aimed at getting incremental, stable and uninterrupted power because  achieving set targets required step-by-step approach.

    He appealed to Nigerians to be patient with the All Progressives Congress (APC) administration, assuring that the party would deliver on its promises.

    The minister listed the attacks on gas pipelines; kidnapping of expatriates working on power sustainability, procedures and inefficiencies in power transmission and distribution as parts of the the challenges facing the sector.

    He also cited sabotage in governance; non-payment of tariff, poor investment, among others as other challenges frustrating the power sector.

    The minister noted that the issue of stable power was characterised by many years of broken promises but added that the sector was making progress.

    He said the country was not yet feeling the impact of the work done because of the processes involved in transmission and distribution.

    Fashola said: “The issue of containers left in the port for about 10 years; explosion of pipelines; badly installed equipment; cancelled tariff, electricity theft among others are all the handiwork of men.

    “Now, if men and women created these problems, in my view only men and women can solve them.

    “You and I have a role to play, I have stood up to play my role, have you?”

    The minister highlighted issues related to metering and tariff and asked Nigerians to blow whistle when they noticed sharp practices among the operators.

    The varsity’s Pro-Chancellor and  Governing Council Chairman Wale Babalakin said  the country needed a well thought-out  solution based on creativity.

    Dr. Babalakin said: “In thinking of the power generating solution of this country, we also we must be creative. We have what it takes but we indeed need to work on our attitude.

    “And that is why I am calling on all to join hand in reforming our education sector which is key to any developmental stride.

    .“Education as the engine room for the revolution of Nigeria must be fostered.”

    The Vice Chancellor, Prof. Rahamon Bello, said Fashola was well informed about  intrigues in the sector and  would get the solution with the support of all Nigerians. Babalakin added: “The most enduring solution to Nigeria’s problems is applied intelligence and this can only be attained through first class education. In thinking of this solution, we must be creative. We have a fair idea of the resources of the government. It is only through very serious technical application to very good resources that we can solve our problems.

    “There is need for cerebral application of our resources. We have everything; we just need a change of attitude. The most gifted people are not those with aptitude, but those with attitude. Aptitude is great with natural resources but attitude can be developed. I urge the intelligentsia, let us collectively develop the solution.

    “It is sad that we are far behind in education and we are indifferent. How do we resolve this? Let us all collectively find a solution. Education, as the engine room for the resolution of Nigeria’s problems, must be fostered.”

    The Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences of the university, Prof. Iyiola Oni, noted that the multiplier effects of power outages in the country had led to high cost of production.

    Oni also stated that inflation, unemployment and poverty were ripple effects of the power sector challenge.

    “In effect, this means that most of these  negative vices are more likely to become things of the past if sufficient and reliable power supply can be guaranteed,” he said

  • Rolling back man-made crises in Nigeria, others

    Rolling back man-made crises in Nigeria, others

    On Saturday, the U.S. Government announced a nearly 639 million dollars in additional humanitarian assistance to the millions of people affected by food insecurity and violence in South Sudan, Nigeria, Somalia, and Yemen. Tens of millions of people are in need of humanitarian assistance as a result of the man-made crises in South Sudan, Nigeria, and Yemen, all of which are driven by violent conflicts, and in Somalia, where ongoing conflict is exasperating the effects of severe and prolonged drought. Despite the influx of aid that has helped to alleviate famine in some areas of South Sudan, and has so far prevented famine in Yemen and Somalia, the overall food security situation is worsening, and life-threatening hunger continues to spread in both scope and in scale.

    Through this additional funding that we’re announcing, the United States can provide additional emergency food and nutrition assistance, life-saving medical care, improved sanitation, safe drinking water, emergency shelter, protection for civilians who’ve been affected by conflict, and support hygiene and health programs to treat and prevent disease outbreaks for all four crises. This additional funding brings the total U.S. contribution to over 1.8 billion dollars in humanitarian assistance for the four famine crises since the beginning of fiscal year 2017.

    The United States is one of the largest donors of humanitarian assistance in all four crises and is the largest single donor of humanitarian assistance in the world. The aid we provide represents the best of America’s generosity and goodwill. We will continue to work with our international and local partners to provide this life-saving aid needed to avert famine and to support communities impacted by these crises.

    The situation in southern Ethiopia is deteriorating, and it might be catastrophic without additional interventions. The UN is warning that emergency food supplies and nutrition commodities in Ethiopia are running dry, with both the World Food Programme and the Ethiopia government anticipating partial pipeline breaks beginning by the end of June, with perhaps complete breaks by September. Now, during last year’s El Niño drought, the government of Ethiopia demonstrated its growing capacity to lead a robust and timely response, which supported over 10 million people with food, nutrition, water, and agricultural assistance. The government of Ethiopia must build on their progress and continue to provide the resources and leadership necessary to combat this year’s ongoing humanitarian crisis. And while this announcement is limited just to the four crises outlined earlier, that does not mean we are [correction] forgetting about Ethiopia and aren’t deeply concerned in Ethiopia and what’s happening there.

    The United States remains the largest humanitarian donor in Ethiopia, and we plan to continue ramping up our assistance, and strongly encourage additional contributions from the government of Ethiopia and other donors to meet the forecasted gap in funding required to address the needs of people there. So far this year, we have already provided 225 million dollars for humanitarian assistance in Ethiopia, and, just to restate, we continue and plan to intend to ramp up our assistance.

    So far this year we have provided over 22 million dollars in humanitarian assistance to Kenya, and, as you mentioned, the United States has been a partner of the Kenyan people for many years and we have a very robust program there, for not just humanitarian assistance but also our development work, particularly, right now, as Kenya prepares for elections and deals especially in its north with the same drought that is affecting Somalia. One of the things about Kenya in recent years has been the ability of us to partner with the Kenyan government and partners there on resiliency programs, which have really gone to help aid the resilience of communities and get agricultural production up in areas where it’s needed most. We have studies that have shown that for every dollar that we spend in those resilience programs, we save almost three dollars in humanitarian assistance needs. So Kenya is very much on our mind, we continue to work there, we will continue to ramp up efforts as needed.

    The United States government’s budgeting process can often seem very complicated. So the funding that we are announcing today, much of it was part of the appropriation we received several months ago, with the final FY17 budget agreement in Congress. So we’re very happy and thankful for Congress’s generous support for these humanitarian assistance programs, and the additional funding they’ve provided this year, which is the largest amount of humanitarian assistance funding in our nation’s history. The way our funding works is “no year money,” so we are continually assessing, analyzing, and then funding needs throughout the year, regardless of where we are in the budget cycle. And we pride ourselves on having perhaps the world’s fastest ability to fund emergencies and redirect funding if need be, and put assistance directly where it needs to be, as fast as possible.

    No amount of humanitarian assistance will ever solve these problems. These problems are a manifestation and symptom of the conflicts that are going on in all four countries. Somalia is also grappling with drought, but the conflict there, like the conflict in South Sudan, like the conflict in Yemen, like the conflicts in Northern Nigeria, it’s really the conflict that is causing these problems. So the United States is involved in all four countries with our diplomatic efforts and the efforts that we do engaging with the rest of the international community.

    While these four countries are grappling with a food insecurity crisis, that is just one of the many important issues that Africa is dealing with right now and will continue to deal with, unfortunately, for some time to come. And that’s why the U.S. remains a friend and a partner to Africa, and we remain the single largest donor of humanitarian assistance in Africa, including South Sudan, the horn of Africa, and the Lake Chad Basin.

    We hold it as a sacred trust when we are spending United States taxpayer dollars, and we put a huge priority on making sure, in many multiple ways, that we track all of this assistance. No diversion at all is acceptable, and we require all of our partners to have their own monitoring and evaluation plans, and they all have strict audit guidelines that they must fulfill on an annual basis so that they are constantly tracking where the assistance goes. Separate to that, we also have third party monitoring mechanisms that track and make sure that deliveries take place, and we require our partners to report directly and immediately to us and our Inspector General anytime there’s any diversion or any loss of assistance.

    Now, all of these countries provide very difficult work environments, very dangerous work environments; in fact, there are humanitarian workers in all four countries risking their life every day, and what they’re risking their life to do is to see that the assistance gets to who it needs to get to, and they do an extremely good job of that.

    We, along with the rest of the international community, use collective organizations who can independently track, monitor, and verify the situation on the ground. One of those groups is the Famine Early Warning System, or the FEWS Network, which we fund and created, but is also funded by other donors, and that helps us give a non-political, non-governmental, true assessment based on science and real data on what the conditions are in certain countries. Then it’s up to us and our diplomats and others in the international community, other donors, to work with that government to help them come to grips with the situation that they’re dealing with, and to be as transparent and open as possible.

     

    • Excerpts from a briefing by Jenkins, Acting Assistant Administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development’s  Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance
  • Ekiti and its man-made disaster

    Ekiti and its man-made disaster

    It is a state famed for the high intellectual attainments of its people. Just as you would associate crude oil with Bayelsa or Rivers, the mere mention of Ekiti conjures up visions of a land crawling with professors and PhDs.

    But curiously for a people so enamoured of learning, the political leader that has captured their imagination the most in the last 16 years is one not noted for his educational accomplishments.

    It is as if the people became bored with the snooty ways of their super educated elite and hankered after someone earthy. Out of nowhere, Ayodele Fayose happened to them – igniting an on-and-off romance.

    When he first ran for governor he would drive into a village without potable water and distribute the liquid free to villagers. While he was meeting the people’s most pressing needs, his rivals who probably felt better qualified because of their pedigree, were lulling the people to sleep with the same old promises of what they would do.

    Not surprisingly the man form nowhere swept away all in his path to become governor. After leaving office in ignominy and roaming the political wilderness for years, the connection he had with the people still remained. It was something his rivals just couldn’t explain.

    The attraction between the people and Fayose could only be likened to the magnetic pull that draws good girls to bad boys. He can turn on his ‘man of the people’ charm one minute, and the next he’s leading a band of unruly supporters to rough up a High Court judge in his chambers.

    It is not as if the people didn’t know his flaws. Still they chose him over a hardworking intellectual in Dr. Kayode Fayemi whose only sin was that he was aloof. But buyer’s remorse may very well be setting in.

    Fayose is a gaffe machine that never stops giving. Just when you thought he had done his worst, he outdoes himself by drilling down into the basement.

    He is bad news – and that’s not just his critics or members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) talking. Ali Modu Sheriff, one of the claimants to the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) chairmanship, has dismissed him as an embarrassment.

    Governors are elected to govern and improve the quality of life of their people. The Ekiti governor views his time in office as one long drama sketch.

    Many states like his can’t pay salaries. But the more serious among his colleagues are restructuring their economies and engaging the Federal Government to get needed funds. Some are blocking leakages, cutting budgets to save funds.

    But what does our ‘man of the people’ do? He stops his cavalcade by the roadside to cut ponmo! Great photo opportunity which cuts no ice with the hungry. At other times, he jumps on a motorbike amidst a swarm of Okada riders and dashes up and down the lone decent road in his rustic state capital and scurries back to Government House. Problem solved!

    But news flash! Ekiti workers are still on strike and say nothing short of three months arrears of payment would do.

    The governor loves to position himself as some political grandmaster whose perceived madness has some underlying method. Those who buy this pitch love him to bits. But even among his fawning followers the act may be wearing thin. This past week, may come to be remembered as the week Fayose unravelled.

    It all began with the dramatic announcement by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) that courtesy of a court order it had frozen a couple of accounts held by the governor, his family members, associates and the former Minister of State for Defence, Musiliu Obanikoro. The amounts involved run into billions of naira

    Fayose would have us believe that President Muhammadu Buhari goes to sleep at night and wakes up in the morning thinking about him. So his first reaction was to launch a stinging personal attack at president’s wife, Aisha, with the intention of getting some mud splattered on the once who had been sold to the world as a paragon of integrity.

    There was just a little problem. Two former EFCC chairmen – Nuhu Ribadu and Ibrahim Lamorde – who were involved with the Halliburton bribery scandal confirmed that an impostor ‘Aisha Buhari’ was the one involved in US Congressman William Jefferson’s case – and not the president’s wife.

    But rather than staging a tactical retreat to allow other events to take away the poignancy of his blunder, the rattled Fayose staggered from one unforced error to another.

    In a bid to distance himself from the disbursements made from the office of the former National Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), he threatened to unmask his financial backers if they didn’t speak up in his hour of distress.

    Making good the threat, he makes the disturbing claim that Zenith Bank bankrolled his political campaign. With bank maintaining a stony silence, Fayose’s movie production subsidiary went into overdrive. Lo and behold within 24 hours we were watching edited videos purportedly showing the bank’s officials stammering and grovelling before the governor. He said they had come to ‘beg’ him. For what sins we are not told.

    Given the governor’s past antics one may be tempted to dismiss the episode as another charade. A similar thing happened not too long ago when his erstwhile ally, Dr. Temitope Aluko, started giving tell-all interviews all over the place.

    But before you knew it Fayose had managed to get Aluko into a setting where it seemed like the prodigal had repented having seen the folly of his ways. Before rolling cameras the governor patted his one-time ally fondly on the back, declaring ‘he’s my boy!’

    Next day, a stunned Aluko was repudiating what occurred the day before as a well-orchestrated charade. Is this what we just witnessed with the supposedly begging bank officials?

    Ordinarily, there are one or two ways by which banks part with money. They either give you a loan of sorts or a donation. A loan would require documentation and security no matter how big the customer is.

    Was Fayose given a loan by a conservative bank to prosecute an election against an incumbent without any guarantee he would win? Is it even credible to imagine such a scenario given that the risk analysis would have killed off the proposal?

    If he was given a donation, what was the amount involved and how does that action line up with provisions of the law?

    Section 221 of the 1999 Constitution states: “No association, other than a political party, shall canvass for votes for any candidate at any election or contribute to the funds of any political party or to the election expenses of any candidate at an election.”

    There is a similar prohibition in the Companies and Allied Matters Act Cap. C20 L.F.N. 2004 (CAMA). Section 38 (2) of CAMA provides that:

    “A company shall not have or exercise power either directly or indirectly to make a donation or gift of any of its property or funds to a political party or political association or for any political purpose; and if any company, in breach of this subsection makes any donation or gift of its property to a political party or political association, or for any political purpose, the officers in default and any member who voted for the breach shall be jointly and severally liable to refund to the company the sum or value of the donation or gift and in addition, the company and every such officer or member shall be guilty of an offence and liable to a fine equal to the amount or value of the donation or gift.”

    The allegations made by the governor are not only grave, they have legal implications such that an institution with the profile of Zenith Bank cannot afford to keep mum for too long – hoping this embarrassing episode will just disappear.

    Such an explanation could shed more light on the contents of the frozen accounts. While Fayose is tying himself up in knots bleating about his precious immunity from prosecution (not investigation), he could help the discussion by telling the world how he came about the frozen billions.

    The governor may still have his diehard loyalists, still I suspect that many who were chanting ‘Oshokomole’ on Election Day must by now realise that they’ve been had.

    Many now mock the Ekitis by saying that they sold their future to Fayose by collecting his miserable ‘stomach infrastructure.’ Without much sympathy they urge the people to live with the choice they have made. On this point though I have a different perspective.

    It might not be entirely correct to say that Fayose was the will of the Ekiti people reflected on voting day. The revelations of Captain Sagir Koli over the Ekitigate scandal have been corroborated by the emerging details of how the PDP moved billions into the state to topple Fayemi.

    So in reality the incumbent was virtually imposed himself on the people in a brazen exercise in subversion of the democratic will. Of course, the people have their own share of the blame because Fayose could not have risen to challenge for power if the people – masses and elite – had not fallen for his allurements and tolerated his excesses.

    Unfortunately for the governor stolen waters are not really enjoyable. He knows what legal troubles are waiting for him when the screen of immunity is lifted. That perhaps explains why he keeps shouting ‘I’m not afraid of Buhari’ when no one has accused him of being afraid.

    It reminds me of the story of a man who had been on death row in Kirikiri for close to 30 years. One day God showed him mercy when a prominent pastor visited and helped set him free. He later told the man of God that his worst nightmare all those years was he couldn’t sleep between the hours of 12.00 midnight and 4.00 am.

    He said the hangmen used to come during that period to take those to be executed. So each night he would stay awake all night when he heard footsteps, wondering whether they were coming for him.

    Forget the noise and drama, Fayose surely dreads what’s coming to him.

     

  • These gods are man-made

    Think continuously of those who are truly great, men and women who by their deeds fight for fairness and the good of all; think of those who wear on their hearts’ sleeve and domicile in the inner recesses of their souls, irrepressible zeal to make our lives better and worthy of our dreams …there are no such men and women alive, are there? For if there are, Nigeria would be 21st   century version of Eden or Al Jannah; and men and women on whose watch our country so evolves and appreciate would be everything and even gods.

    Our people are quite inane, they wouldn’t know how to create a heaven or sustain the like of it but they create gods by the dozen. I do not speak of divinity that manifests only in far-fetched miracles and dreams; I speak of men and women, boys and girls that we quite desperately and misguidedly deify as our vanities dictate.

    Being rich is the closest you get to being god in Nigeria. Add an impressive root and very intimidating academic record to the mix and you have yourself a 21st century hero or god. Of what calibre are our idols? Who really is the Nigerian god? Who is an example of a quintessential idol? Allison-Maduekwe? Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu? President Muhammadu Buhari? Former President Goodluck Jonathan? Reuben Abati? Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala? Do their deeds make them worthy of hero-worship or blind deification?

    To what would these individuals owe our reverence of them? Some would say it is their brilliance and extraordinary achievements in their chosen callings. Anyone could be brilliant from time to time but intelligence is what we have to affect all of the time. How intelligent are our ruling class? How intelligent is President Goodluck Jonathan? How intelligent is Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala? How intelligent is Sanusi Lamido Sanusi? How intelligent are they and every other character we continue to endure in the Nigerian ruling class?

    The answer lies as much in their utterances as their deeds. Alas! Transcendent moments and heroic acts are rather deeds of an exalted intelligence, something which Nigeria’s incumbent ruling class pitifully lacks. But despite its protests and dissatisfaction with the status quo, the Nigerian citizenry equally lacks that towering immensity of intellect and strength of character that remains prime requirements in the constitution of a progressive race.

    Our lust for heroes and gods illustrates a fable; it is not of latent strength but disintegration rather it reveals the weakness and shallowness of the Nigerian adult’s awfully preadolescent mind. It reiterates a very shrill cry for help that’s at once selfish, infantile and retrogressive. Put precisely, we are incapable of creating such super humans or elements worthy of being called gods of unconditional love and compassion. All we are capable of are gods of impoverishment and gods of war.

    If we are to be judged by what Greek philosopher, Pythagoras, deems the human measure of all things, shall we fare excellently or not? Things have gone on decadently for too long; that is why idiots as fragile as clay toys have evolved into outsized heroes and gods, on our watch.

    The Nigerian hero is a human sound bite. He is essentially a half-formed mammal, animal to be precise. Take for instance gods and goddesses we have created as our ruling class; they are no longer exclusively Nigerian or humane. Rather they have been turned upside-down and inside-out; they have been scrambled, corrupted and fertilized by ghastly manifestations of self love, tribalism, wantonness, perverted education and sense of worth.

    This abnormality is accentuated by the citizenry’s lack of courage and inclination to dither when the situation calls for decisiveness and fearlessness in determining the course of our affairs. “All gods are homemade, and it is we who pull their strings, and so, give them the power to pull ours,” says Aldous Huxley, English writer.

    Truly; the manner in which the Nigerian electorate worships its ruling class and celebrates its mediocrity makes it impossible for the latter to affect the necessary humaneness, tact and humility that are prime requirements of occupants of exalted public offices. Having made super humans of them, they begin to delude that they are untouchable and unquestionable. They begin to parade themselves as gods and see the electorate on whose strength they ascended to their exalted positions as lesser creatures.

    They seek the exaggerated safety and coziness of fortresses they build around themselves to protect their ill-gotten wealth and ostentatious lifestyles. Suddenly it becomes taboo for them to hobnob with the working class. It becomes abominable for their wives, daughters and cooks to visit the same grocer or shop in the same market as the masses.

    Shamelessly, they clear our public coffers of our collective fund without any inhibition and in response; we celebrate them and grovel at their feet for crumbs of what is rightfully ours. Whenever they intrude our world, they leave behind pungent memories and pains. Whenever they come to town, we must be kept in traffic for them to move freely; whenever they are ‘guests of honour’ at our functions, we are treated with little or no honour. Apology to Kayode Oteniya.

    The chief quality of a true leader is the apparent sincerity in his manners. The speeches he makes are never mere platitudinous enterprise and his developmental programmes are never extraordinary elephant projects; his politics and humanity are not only heard but concretely seen and felt.

    Really there is prime merit in everything about him, and his life generally, radiates truth. His life is what we may call a great sober sincerity. A sort of temperate authenticity that is not only blunt but uncompromising. His fervor is undomesticated, bordering on the wild and forever wrestling naked with the elements that be for the love of the good and the truth of things. In that sense, there is something of the savage yet humane in him like all great men.

    He is one in whom one still finds human substance. He relishes no opportunity to tell any colourful story of himself anywhere; usually, he stands bare and grapples like a giant, face to face, heart to heart, with the naked truth of things.  ‘That, after all,” according to Thomas Carlyle “is the sort of man for one.”

    And such is the type of man we should value above all others. He is the man who as Norman Mailer, an American writer, puts it, would argue with gods and awaken devils to contest his vision. When he dies, his death would be felt nationwide as something more than a historic calamity; women would weep and men would fight back tears as if they had heard of the death of a very dear friend or Saint.

    The creation of such honorable man and god would be our noblest work. But we seem incapable yet of such honorable task. We could start by stripping ourselves of the greater vanities and portentous contradictions. Unhappy the land that has no heroes, says Andrea; No, unhappy the land that needs heroes, responds Galileo in Bertolt Brecht, late German playwright and poet’s “The Life of Galileo.” Regrettably, the meaning is lost on us all.