Tag: Mandela

  • Mandela: The man of destiny

    Mandela: The man of destiny

    Nelson Mandela, the great freedom fighter and first black president of South Africa, was buried last Sunday at Qunu, his remote birth place, in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. His death on December 5, after a long illness, evoked an almost unprecedented global outpouring of grief and sadness. Virtually all the world’s leaders, including leaders of countries that had once denounced him as a dangerous Communist and terrorist, mourned him as a global icon, and paid him homage as one of the most outstanding political figures of the 20th century. Through his exemplary life and epic struggle for freedom he touched so many lives, cutting across race, colour, creed, and nationality. Millions of people, rich and poor, all over the world mourned him and felt a profound sense of personal loss at his demise. Not since the assassination of US President John Kennedy in November, 1963, in Dallas, USA, has there been such an outpouring of grief and sadness at the death of a political leader.

    Nelson Mandela was a man whose entire life was shaped by destiny. In so many ways, he was a man of destiny. Born in a remote part of South Africa, his father was a minor tribal chief. If he had not ventured out of Qunu he would have ended his life unknown as a minor tribal chief. No one could have predicted that he would in future emerge as the leader of the epic and bloody struggle of the South African blacks against apartheid South Africa and eventually emerge as South Africa’s first black president. But throughout out his difficult life and harrowing personal experiences under apartheid South Africa, destiny beckoned him towards greatness. As he wrote in his memoirs, ‘Long Walk to Freedom’, not satisfied with the prospect of being a minor court official in Qunu, he fled with his cousin to Johannesburg, the prosperous South African gold city, and the country’s commercial capital, and worked in the mines there. It was a back breaking, poorly paid, and humiliating job, with black workers huddled together in shacks and horrifying conditions. The white mining officials exercised their authority over black workers with unspeakable brutality.

    When it was discovered that he had fled from home to seek employment in the city and was wanted back at home, he was fired. But instead of returning home, he chose to remain in Johannesburg where he suffered terribly. It was in that city that he encountered the horrors and personal racial humiliation suffered by all non-whites in apartheid South Africa. To borrow the famous words of William Gladstone, a 19th century liberal British prime minister, the apartheid racial system was a ‘negation of God erected into a system of government’. Next to Nazi Germany, it was the most vicious and evil system of government ever devised by humanity. The blacks were treated by the Boers in their own country worse than dogs. They had absolutely no political or economic rights. They were segregated and made to carry passes in their own country. Blacks who had university education were denied jobs in the government.

    In Johannesburg, Nelson Mandela went back to school and eventually studied law part time, after which he worked for a while as a clerk in a white law firm. He lived in a one room apartment in Soweto, the fabled shanty town for the blacks. His wages were so low he could barely support himself financially. Even though he was qualified to be an attorney, he and other black lawyers were denied that opportunity by the apartheid system. In the law firm, he continued to encounter the brutal nature of apartheid. The white office assistant employed in the law firm would not serve him tea at lunch break because he was black. Only his white colleagues could be served.

    It was the personal humiliation he suffered in Johannesburg that led him to join the African National Congress (ANC), then agitating for an end to racism in South Africa. He started a law firm with Oliver Tambo, his lifelong comrade in the long struggle against the apartheid system. He married early in 1946, but his first wife, Evelyn, who was the cousin of Walter Sisulu, a veteran of the struggle, left him because she could not share his unyielding commitment to the struggle. She was an adherent of the Jehovah Witness, a religious movement that forbade the participation of its members in politics. She could no longer stand his complete dedication to the struggle which left her lonely with four young children to bring up on her own. She did not understand the import of the great struggle and the long time spent away from home by her husband in pursuit of his political objective.

    The breakup of the marriage had a devastating effect on Nelson Mandela. By his own account, he returned home one day to an empty house, and found that his wife had packed out, taking the four children of the marriage with her. Even the curtains in the house had been removed by his wife. She had asked him to choose between his family and the anti-apartheid struggle. Though painful, as he admitted in his memoires, he chose the latter and continued with the struggle. Most men would have chosen their family. A few years later, he met and married, Winnie, who, unlike Evelyn, shared his commitment to the struggle. But after five years of marriage he was sent to life imprisonment for treason after the famous Rivonia trial in which he said he was prepared to die for his freedom. He could have been given the death sentence, but was spared by the strong international reaction to the 1963 Sharpeville massacre of unarmed and fleeing 67 blacks, shot in the back by the South African police for carrying out a peaceful demonstration. It was while he was in prison that he became the acknowledged leader of the black struggle in racist South Africa. He refused to compromise the struggle despite blandishments of possible reprieve by the racist regime if he abandoned the struggle. When his first son by Evelyn died, he was in prison and was not allowed to bury him.

    After 27 years in prison he was finally released by the apartheid regime. So much had changed in South Africa during his incarceration. The struggle for freedom had become bloodier and international support for the black struggle for freedom had increased. Economic sanctions against the regime had begun to bite. Fearing a total collapse of the South African economy, the white business community in South Africa, led by Oppenheimer, openly called for negotiations with the ANC. This paved the way for Mandela’s subsequent release and a review of the racist South African Constitution. In the ensuing elections, the ANC won and Nelson Mandela emerged as the first black president of South Africa. He served only one term as president. His job was done and he retired into private life, pleading that his successors should not call him. Jointly with F.W. de Klerk, his white predecessor in office, he received the Nobel Peace award. As president, he reconciled all the races of South Africa and laid the foundation for a rainbow country. He unified a once bitterly divided nation. He was the only leader who could have kept the country together and end racial bitterness and violence in the country. He made enormous personal sacrifice for the nation. He gave everything up for his country’s freedom, including his marriage to his second wife, Winnie, and his children and grandchildren. He never had a normal family life. Soon after his release from prison, he separated from Winnie. The long period of his incarceration had, regrettably, destroyed the marriage irreparably. As he said when announcing his separation from Winnie, it was the destiny and lot of freedom fighters not to enjoy a normal family life.

    Africa has produced other outstanding political leaders such as Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Sekou Toure of Guinea, Abdul Nasser of Egypt, and Nwalimu Julius Nyerere of Tanzania. But they all pale in political and global significance to Nelson Mandela, a truly global phenomenon, who, defying all odds fought courageously for his country’s freedom. As President Obama observed rightly, we may never see the likes of him again. The values for which he fought so bravely in South Africa are eternal and enduring. The anomalous situation in South Africa produced this great man of destiny, a truly global icon, now laid to rest in his home town, Qunu.

  • AAUA names lecture theatre after Mandela

    AAUA names lecture theatre after Mandela

    The Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko (AAUA), in Ondo State, has named its newly completed 500-capacity Lecture Theatre the “Nelson Mandela Lecture Theatre.”

    The Vice Chancellor (VC), Prof. Femi Mimiko, unveiled the name shortly after the death of the former South African president.

    The VC said: “Our duty here this afternoon is to simply unveil a name that the University Council had graciously approved, several months ago, to give to this edifice that has just been delivered. This is our little way of demonstrating how much belief we have in the life and times of a very great man, Nelson Mandela.

    “The purpose is to underscore the fact that here was a man who was born an African, who lived like an African, but grew and had the stature of the best that humanity had ever produced.”

    Mimiko described the late Mandela as the most outstanding individual in this age, who deserved to be honoured in many ways.

    Prof. Mimiko urged members of the university community to imbibe the morals of the late Mandela, saying, “What Mandela represented, what he still represents in our mind, and will continue to represent in the consciousness of people for years to come are those great values that I also want us to embrace as a university – values of hard work, dedication, perseverance and love. Any organisation and life that are built on such values will endure and continue to do well. It is that, that I commend to the members of this community so that our university will continue to move in the direction that we desire for it.”

  • Bad example

    Bad example

    •Jonathan’s criticism of Nigerian politicians at Mandela memorial service is unpresidential

    PRESIDENT Goodluck Jonathan certainly ought to have sufficient experience in office by now to know that he is the chief salesman and public relations officer of the country. Like a competent Chief Executive Officer of an organisation, his primary responsibility is to project the strengths and virtues of his enterprise while working unobtrusively to deal with problems, challenges and weaknesses. A company executive who specialises in showcasing his outfit’s faults will most likely soon be out of business.

    But this was exactly what President Jonathan did in what was supposed to be his tribute to Dr Nelson Mandela at the memorial service organised in honour of the legendary freedom fighter at the Presidential Villa in Abuja on December 8.

    The President did not exhibit good example when he chose the solemn occasion to run down Nigerian politicians, claiming that they lack the virtues of the late Mandela. While rightly extolling Mandela’s widely acknowledged attributes of humility, a forgiving spirit and the ability to unite people, he described Nigerian politicians as being disposed to issuing threats, boasting and playing little gods. He put down members of Nigeria’s political class as “tiny men” who give the impression that “Nigeria is their bedroom from where they make proclamations and intimidate others”.

    For one, the occasion where the President cast aspersion on his fellow politicians was most inauspicious. In attendance were members of the diplomatic corps who must have gone away with a very bad impression of the country’s leadership class. If the President has such contempt for his fellow politicians, why should outsiders take them serious? For, it is from the political class that the country’s leadership elite are recruited. If they are as mean, conceited and frivolous as depicted by Jonathan, how can they be expected to behave responsibly and decently in public office or uphold the rule of law? Again, members of the audience must have gone away with an equally poor opinion of Dr Jonathan himself. This is because he is also a Nigerian politician and did not drop from the moon.

    Yes, Nigerian politicians have their faults just like politicians everywhere, including Mandela’s South Africa. Even then, Jonathan’s generalisation is inappropriate and indefensible, especially for a trained academic and a scientist at that. With the kind of unprincipled and irresponsible politicians he has portrayed as running the country, why should foreign investors channel their capital to Nigeria, for example? This is how weighty such careless presidential pronouncements can be.

    It is not unlikely that Dr Jonathan is unsettled by the often fierce criticisms his administration has been subjected to. But he should expect no less in a vibrant democracy. After all, members of his party also vigorously criticise the opposition in states where the latter are in power. That is how democracy can thrive and grow.

    When the President faces unfair criticism, he must have the equanimity to take it in his stride and decently put the records straight. If subjected to objective criticism, he must demonstrate the humility to admit errors and make amends. If confronted with mean and vile attacks, he must exhibit the generosity of spirit to forgive and never demean his office by throwing mud. After all, those are the virtues for which he and the rest of the world have heaped fulsome praise on Mandela.

    Of course, this is not to say that the office of President should not be given its deserved reverence at all times. It only stands to reason that those who seek to be respected if privileged to occupy the position must avoid doing anything to demystify its dignity.

  • The Mandela factor at FEC meeting

    Last Wednesday’s Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting presided over by Vice President Namadi Sambo had a sizeable number of ministers in attendance compared to past sessions.

    The moment President Goodluck Jonathan is on an official trip abroad, many Ministers are often in the habit of staying away from FEC meetings even though they are in the country.

    These Ministers, however abandon every assignment they have to attend the meetings when the boss is in town.

    In my write-up of October 1, 2013, entitled “Where are the Ministers”, I pointed out how only 14 Ministers attended the FEC meeting presided by Sambo on September 25, 2013 and how the council could not achieve much because of the poor attendance. The meeting only lasted for about one hour, 40 minutes.

    Apart from FEC meeting of September 25 and many other instances before that date, the attendance of FEC meeting conducted by Sambo on Wednesday 4th December, 2013 was not too impressive while full house was recorded the following day when President Jonathan gave 2013 Nigerian National Order of Merit award to three professors at the same venue.

    As if they have all turned a new leaf, 22 ministers did not only appear for last Wednesday FEC meeting, but they were very punctual. The President was away on a trip to South Africa for the late Nelson Mandela’s burial ceremony

    By the time the digital clock in the Chamber was showing 10:00 am, which is the deadline for arriving for the meeting, 19 out of the 22 ministers had already arrived.

    The ministers who attended last week FEC meeting which lasted for about five hours include Special Duties, Police Affairs, Petroleum Resources, FCT, FCT (State), Niger Delta, Niger Delta (State), Mines and Steel, Trade and Investment, Trade and Investment (State), Labour.

    Others include Communication Technology, Power, Agriculture, Women Affairs, Health, Finance, Finance (State), Works (State), Information, Transport and Interior.

    One major reason for the ministers’ high attendance at the meeting is being linked to the opportunity given last week to pay tribute to the Late Nelson Mandela.

    Each of them was given the opportunity to make a comment on the late anti-apartheid crusader.

    Most ministers who were not on foreign trips but absent in FEC meetings presided by Sambo are believed to be using the opportunity provided by the President’s trip abroad to attend to their personal issues.

    Even outside the country, some of them have been accused of abandoning international conferences and seminars to go on shopping spree and other personal businesses.

    A point in case was the recent accusation that some ministers abandoned the Honorary International Investors’ Council (HIIC) meeting in London.

    But the President on arrival in Abuja defended the ministers, saying: “All of them performed very well. I think there are some kinds of misconception. Ministers are not meant to sit throughout the period. Ministers are meant to go and make presentations even in Nigeria.”

    “The only person that normally sits throughout is the Minister of Trade and Investment that warehouses the HIIC. Some ministers don’t normally sit for two days, in a day you may not see a minister. If a minister is meant to make a presentation on the second day, is not that for the two days you will expect all the ministers.”

    “Because I read some of the perception in the media, that the Minister of Communication Technology was not there on Thursday, the Minister of Petroleum was not there on Thursday. They were not meant to make presentation on Thursday, they appeared on Friday and made their presentation. So there is no issue about ministers, people make a lot of insinuations out of nothing.”  He added

    It must be said here again that true service to our fatherland, devoid of pretence or deceptions is paramount in delivering the goods in line with the transformation agenda of the government.

     

  • ‘Madiba’ buried at ancestral home

    ‘Madiba’ buried at ancestral home

    Nelson Mandela has been laid to rest in a family plot, after political and religious leaders paid tribute to South Africa’s first black president at a state funeral service.

    His widow, Graca Machel, and President Jacob Zuma were present for the private, traditional Xhosa ceremony at Mr. Mandela’s ancestral home in Qunu.

    Mr. Zuma had earlier told the larger funeral service that South Africans had to take his legacy forward.

    Mr. Mandela died on December 5.

    A close friend, Ahmed Kathrada, told mourners at the service he had lost an “elder brother” who was with him for many years in prison on Robben Island.

    Mr. Mandela’s casket was carried by the military, accompanied by family and friends, from a specially-erected marquee up a hill to the graveside.

    As his coffin was lowered into the grave, South African military helicopters and jets staged a fly-past and cannons fired a 21-gun salute.

    The BBC reports that it was a fitting send-off for a man widely seen as the “father of the nation.”

    The final day of South Africa’s 10-day commemoration for its late leader began with his coffin taken on a gun carriage from Mr. Mandela’s house to a giant marquee.

    Members of the family had attended an overnight vigil, where a traditional praise singer is believed to have chanted details of his long journey and life.

     

  • Mandela, leadership and Nigeria

    Mandela, leadership and Nigeria

    When Winston Churchill died in 1965, some 112 world leaders or their representatives from around the globe attended his funeral. When Charles de Gaulle died in 1969, and in spite of leaving instruction his burial should be a private ceremony, some 63 leaders brushed aside his request to honour him. By universal acclaim, Nelson Mandela was one of the world’s greatest leaders. About 100 world leaders were at his memorial service last Tuesday. The announcements of their deaths were as equally prosaic and memorable as the great number of dignitaries that attended their burials. Queen Elizabeth II described Sir Winston in the following words: “The whole world is the poorer by the loss of his many-sided genius while the survival of this country and the sister nations of the Commonwealth, in the face of the greatest danger that has ever threatened them, will be a perpetual memorial to his leadership, his vision, and his indomitable courage.” The then prime minister, Harold Wilson, was even more vigorous: “Sir Winston will be mourned all over the world by all who owe so much to him. He is now at peace after a life in which he created history and which will be remembered as long as history is read.”

    But nothing exceeds French President Georges Pompidou’s description of De Gaulle’s death in succinctness and brevity. “General de Gaulle is dead. France is a widow.” And while President Jacob Zuma was also apt on Mandela, saying, “Our nation has lost its greatest son. Our people have lost a father,” perhaps the most memorable would be the US President Barack Obama’s pithy though hardly original tribute to Mandela. “He belongs to the ages,” said the US president. Both in the offer of tributes and the delivery of tributes at the memorial service itself, few could have matched Mr Obama, who by his mere appearance, which the crowd at the stadium looked forward to, and his oratory, simply shone like a gem.

    By universal acclaim, Mr Mandela was one of the world’s greatest leaders. As gleaned from the tributes to the great icon, he showed the way to peace, unity, forgiveness and reconciliation in a world riven by wars and hatred. In the words of Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations, “Nelson Mandela was more than one of the greatest leaders of our time. He was one of our greatest teachers. He taught by example, he sacrificed so much, and was willing to give up everything for freedom, equality and justice. His compassion stands out most.” Mr Obama ended his tribute to Mandela last Tuesday asserting that “We will never see his likes again.”

    Most commentators agree on the qualities that made Mr Mandela to number among the greatest world leaders. They are not wrong. Having stayed in prison for 27 years and refused to compromise on the ideals he lived for and was prepared to die for, as he said during the 1964 Rivonia Trial, and having saved his country from disintegration and reconciled them and moulded them into one of the world’s leading multicultural societies, his greatness appeared complete and unquestionable. While I think his greatness indeed encompassed these facts and many more, as declared by many world leaders, I believe there are other more pertinent reasons for his greatness.

    The most elementary proof that shows that Mr Mandela numbers among the world’s greatest leaders is provided, not by the tributes of world leaders, but by former President Richard Nixon’s observations in his book, Leaders. According to him, “When the curtain goes down on a play, members of the audience file out of the theatre and go home to resume their normal lives. When the curtain comes down on a leader’s career, the very lives of the audience have been changed, and the course of history may have been profoundly altered.” No one doubts that because of Mr Mandela, the lives of his people have been changed and South African history has been altered perhaps for ever. Indeed, every analyst and historian agrees on this. However, I want to focus on three unusual and overlooked factors that explain Mr Mandela’s greatness, for all the fine things said about him merely indicate other deeper, more profound things lying within him.

    First, Mr Mandela, like any other great leader, was specifically equipped for leadership by forces beyond himself, and with a healthy measure of attributes that conduce to great leadership which neither he nor anyone else could fully explain. Thabo Mbeki, Mr Mandela’s successor, is firm, brilliant and blessed with administrative acumen, but he lacks Mandela’s judgement, instinctive love for people bordering on populism, and what some writers have described as the intuitive iconoclasm a liberator needs to challenge the authorities of his day irrespective of the threat to his own life, future and well-being. Mandela had it in abundance, and so did Martin Luther, George Washington, and several others. We can identify these unusual qualities when great leaders exhibit them; but we are unable to account for why one leader has it and another does not. To suggest these attributes are simply idiosyncratic is to beg the question.

    The lofty principles displayed by Mr Mandela, his strength of character, his almost unerring judgement, his implacable will, and his supreme inner confidence are evident. But how did he get to that point? I once suggested in this place that the books a great leader reads might trigger some of these attributes, but even this explanation does not fully account for the presence of leadership attributes in a person. Nor is Shakespeare of any help in Twelfth Night when he said that “Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon ’em.” In fact, for a leader to be listed among great leaders, he must not only be born with it, he must work (achieve) for it, and then circumstances must conspire to make (thrust upon) him great.

    One of Mr Mandela’s daughters recently made an oblique reference to the second factor accounting for a leader’s greatness. A leader must either cultivate aloofness or be naturally detached from people and circumstances around him, even seeming to be cruel. Makaziwe Mandela, the icon’s oldest surviving child once told the press she was not sure that their father loved them, a feeling she said was shared by the children. According to Dr Makiziwe, politics had fully taken their father’s time, and his letters to them, even while he was in prison, were cold and distant. Even the considerably uxorious letters to Winnie appeared in retrospect to be a means of escape from the harshness and drudgery of prison life.

    De Gaulle was not a romantic, but he showed emotions for his handicapped daughter, Anne who had Down syndrome. Churchill put politics first before his wife, Clementine, but was fond of his children only as a reaction to his own father’s indifference to him. Suleiman the Magnificent thought nothing of the wholesale murder of most of his children to pave way for his successor, Selim II, in 1556, and Stalin, apart from his well-known cruelty to millions of Russians, virtually exterminated his relatives, not to talk of the harsh treatment he meted out to his wives and children. Napoleon virtually abjured the tender things of life, notwithstanding his clumsy on and off relationship with the unfaithful Josephine, his long-term wife and mistress, and Julius Caesar was almost cursory in the way he threw out his wife Pompeia for her indiscrete, not adulterous, relationship with a young patrician, Publius Clodius Pulcher, gifting us the expression “Caesar’s wife must be above suspicion.” Space will not permit mention of Lincoln whom many parents accused of being insensitive to the slaughter of thousands of their children who served as soldiers during the American civil war. Or of Alexander the Great (356 BC – 323 BC) and Genghis Khan (1162-1227) who pushed their armies to the limit in their quest for glory and amid unexampled human slaughter. Or of Peter the Great (1672-1725) who, as I once indicated here, tortured his son, Alexis, to death for plotting his overthrow.

    But whether detachment or aloofness, these great world leaders brought the two attributes to the service of either empire building or statecraft, or both. Mr Mandela sometimes reflected on his own aloofness, wondering guiltily whether he was not to blame for the troubles and deprivations his wife and children endured. But it was clear his family life was sacrificed for the higher good of liberating South Africa from apartheid. His sacrifices came full circle when he surrendered completely to the struggle, when he declared his preparedness to die, when he gave up his family and attendant pleasures, when he gave up power in 1999 after judging it was the right thing to do, and when he even gave up his own black people in their unstated quest for either some form of revenge or at least some form of reckoning, preferring instead, reconciliation and the establishment of a multicultural society.

    The third reason for Mandela’s greatness must be the historical conjuncture President Nixon wrote about in one of his books. No matter how brilliant and equipped a leader is, the time and place must be right to propel him to great heights. In short, history must conspire in his favour by producing the local and international circumstances to make the liberator or agitator a great man. What if Mr Mandela had been killed a few years into his incarceration? What if his white jailors had behaved with the lack of humaneness Nigerian jailors are accustomed to? Not only would Mr Mandela be dead and stone dead, South Africa itself might probably never have the chance to enjoy the peace and reconciliation only a Mandela could have nurtured after the collapse of apartheid. A leader must meet his moment; not too soon, lest he falter and even fail, or too late, lest he succumb to discouragement or even die unfulfilled. Circumstances met Mr Mandela, and they kept him alive until he fulfilled his destiny. According to President Nixon, there was hardly a great leader he knew who did not have that inscrutable expectation which they called by various names. Some called it luck, others called it hope, and yet others called it destiny. Whatever name it is called, it plays a crucial role in both the emergence of a leader and his promotion into the pantheon of greats.

    It was perhaps the acute awareness of this fact that made President Obama, who by much study understands the essential elements of greatness and power, to conclude that we would never see the likes of Mandela again. Mr Obama knows there is little a leader can do to furnish the conditions under which his greatness would manifest. Lincoln did not create the conditions necessary for the American civil war. But he met it with character, courage and great principles, and anchored all three on a deep and unyielding philosophical conviction about human dignity. Imagine for a moment that Napoleon Bonaparte’s coup of Eighteenth Brumaire in 1799 had failed; imagine if General Hindenburg had had Adolf Hitler shot after the latter’s Beer Hall Putsch of 1923 failed; imagine if Churchill had been killed when he was being captured in 1899 during the Boer War. And would the world have had an Augustus Caesar had his great-uncle Julius Caesar not been assassinated in 44 BC, or, since he was sickly, had he succumbed to the illness that plagued him as a youth before he wormed his way into power?

    If President Goodluck Jonathan understood some of these things, he would not have spoken the way he did during last Sunday’s memorial service organised in honour of Mr Mandela, nor would he rule with the spectacular incompetence former President Olusegun Obasanjo has alleged against him. Gen Ibrahim Babangida could of course not be a Mandela, but he stood on the threshold of honour and history in 1993, and failed the test. The sanctimonious Chief Obasanjo had the best opportunity next to Mandela to be an African legend, but he was unfortunately too unknowing to understand what history was telling him in a still small voice during his boisterous eight years as president. See, also, what great chance Gen Yakubu Gowon fluffed in 1973 when he abandoned his transition to civil rule programme. We must acknowledge that once a leader does not have the qualities of greatness in him, in full or half measure, he cannot even begin to climb to the mountaintop, let alone see the Promised Land, or imagine how to get there.

    It is futile to preach to Dr Jonathan the principles and practice of leadership. He does not have it in him; for these things are innate in a leader. More, they are sublime and indefinable values that grate on the nerves and senses of a leader irritated by his own constant misapprehensions. There was nothing anybody could do to discipline or caution Chief Obasanjo as he frittered away the great chance history threw upon his undeserving laps; and there was nothing anyone could have done to make Generals Gowon and Babangida see the future beyond their fateful actions of 1973 and 1993 respectively.

    Once a great leader comes along in Nigeria, Nigerians will know. And they will see in the stars and in the signs of the age indisputable proof. When that happens, they will not fear he would misfire and make irredeemable mistakes, for though he is human, he would have the intellect, intuition and judgement to do what is right at grave moments. When he comes, he will beat the swords of our ethnic and sectarian disagreements into ploughshares of development, and the spears of political mediocrity into pruning hooks of democracy, peace and good governance. He will also cause the arithmetical madness in the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) to cease, and the constitutional folly exemplified by the police in Rivers State to come to end. And from Abuja shall come forth the law to govern the people and make crooked places straight.

  • Mandela: And the world stood still

    Mandela: And the world stood still

    Mandela was the leveller as we all became one huge humanity, under God

    ‘Born during World War I, far from the corridors of power, a boy raised herding cattle and tutored by elders of his Thembu tribe – Madiba would emerge as the last great liberator of the 20th century. Like Gandhi, he would lead a resistance movement – a movement that at its start held little prospect of success. Like King, he would give potent voice to the claims of the oppressed, and the moral necessity of racial justice. He would endure a brutal imprisonment that began in the time of Kennedy and Khrushchev, and reached the final days of the Cold War. Emerging from prison, without force of arms, he would – like Lincoln – hold his country together when it threatened to break apart. Like America’s founding fathers, he would erect a constitutional order to preserve freedom for future generations – a commitment to democracy and rule of law ratified not only by his election, but by his willingness to step down from power.’ That was President Barak Obama, who, himself made history as America’s first-ever black President, about another man of history; indeed, unarguably one of the greatest men of history, the inimitable Nelson Mandela.

    But President Obama did not stop there in his kaleidoscopic description of Mandela. Going further, he said: ‘It was precisely because he could admit to imperfection – because he could be so full of good humour, even mischief, despite the heavy burdens he carried – that we loved him so. He was not a bust made of marble; he was a man of flesh and blood – a son and husband, a father and a friend. That is why we learned so much from him; that is why we can learn from him still. For nothing he achieved was inevitable. In the arc of his life, we see a man who earned his place in history through struggle and shrewdness; persistence and faith. He tells us what’s possible not just in the pages of dusty history books, but in our own lives as well.’

    How one hopes the world, especially its leaders, political, who rule the world, and the economic, either those in control of the stupendously rich North or those minding the beggarly South in its death throes, would truly learn from this quintessential human being that ‘we are all bound together in ways that can be invisible to the eye; that there is a oneness to humanity; that we achieve ourselves by sharing ourselves with others, and caring for those around us.’

    If only they will know, that, in the end, deprivations, even wars, will settle nothing.

    While he laid there comatose in hospital those countless months, and members of his family quarrelled, even publicly, the world almost forgot. But here, indeed, was a man who had already become a saint while here on earth, one whose very passing, even the heavens will acknowledge as it opened up during those final hours; a sign that one truly great, passed through the African portals.

    And has the world been literally on a positive binge?

    From all corners of the earth, a hundred serving and former Heads of State, and still counting, it has been elegies, eulogies and testaments galore. The world rose up in one like never before; totally unmindful of statuses. Mandela was the leveller as we all became one huge humanity, under God.

    When shall the world see the like again?

    Mandela’s entire history, from his minor royalty background, to his education and activism, his imprisonment and stay in power as his country’s president, not to forget ‘the Mandela Option’ many a Head of state would rather instigate a civil war than emulate; Mandela’s total persona is a continuing study in how best to live life in the service of another. But he did not teach lessons only by his actions; he left behind words and worries, enough to torment Africa, especially Nigeria, for a whole century after his translation. In this respect, none of his admonitions would ever rank higher than his following message to Nigerians, excerpted from a 2007 interview granted Dr Hakeem Baba-Ahmed as recently published by saharareporters:

    “YOU know I am not very happy with Nigeria. I have made that very clear on many occasions. Yes, Nigeria stood by us more than any nation, but you let yourselves down, and Africa and the black race very badly. Your leaders have no respect for their people. They believe that their personal interests are the interests of the people. They take people’s resources and turn it into personal wealth. There is a level of poverty in Nigeria that should be unacceptable. I cannot understand why Nigerians are not more angry than they are.

    “What do young Nigerians think about your leaders and their country and Africa? Do you teach them history? Do you have lessons on how your past leaders stood by us and gave us large amounts of money? You know I hear from Angolans and Mozambicans and Zimbabweans how your people opened their hearts and their homes to them. I was in prison then, but we know how your leaders punished western companies who supported Apartheid.

    “What about the corruption and the crimes? Your elections are like wars. Now we hear that you cannot be president in Nigeria unless you are Muslim or Christian. Some people tell me your country may break up. Please don’t let it happen.

    “Let me tell you what I think you need to do. You should encourage leaders to emerge who will not confuse public office with sources of making personal wealth. Corrupt people do not make good leaders. Then you have to spend a lot of your resources for education.

    “Educate children of the poor, so that they can get out of poverty. Poverty does not breed confidence. Only confident people can bring changes. Poor, uneducated people can also bring change, but it will be hijacked by the educated and the wealthy…give young Nigerians good education. Teach them the value of hard work and sacrifice, and discourage them from crimes which are destroying your image as a good people.”

    There can hardly be a better way of concluding this article than with the following tribute to Mandela by Dr. Kayode Fayemi, Governor of Ekiti State: ‘The passing of Nelson Mandela after his prolonged hospitalisation should not be a cause for sadness on any account. We extend our deepest sympathies to his family and offer our prayers for them and for the people of South Africa. But we also recognise that his passing at the ripe old age of 95 is a fitting crown to the rich full life that Madiba lived, playing a starring role in what is surely the 20th century’s most compelling odyssey of human freedom from tyranny. Rather than mourning, Mandela’s transition into glory should be an occasion for celebration and reflection. Firstly, we celebrate the final consummation of a life well spent. The phrase “a life well spent” which is commonly used in obituaries has become an overworked cliché but in the case of Madiba it is not. Rather, it is more than worthily applied to describe a man who expended his energies in the service of humanity, risking everything, his life inclusive, to actualise the ideal of freedom. It is this exemplary life that we have much cause to celebrate.’

    Even, as we revel in the honour and blessing of having lived to witness the life and times of one of history’s most iconic political figures, we must also ponder his luminous legacy. His death closes an epic story of the triumph of the human spirit over injustice and tyranny.

  • Deus ex Mandela

    Deus ex Mandela

    In the beginning they took Mandela away from his family. In the end, we are taking him away from his country, his continent, his people and his race. The former rebel leader and South African terrorist has become a global icon. There are not many of these special people in human history. They can be counted. It is a moment to be cherished and savoured. Mandela’s origins will not be denied in future, but he has moved from being an African hero to a world-historic personage.

    No matter what mortal remnant of Nelson Mandela is buried tonight, he has already achieved immortality. For a man who wanted to be no more than a competent stick fighter back in his backwater village, it is a starry ascent. For a prince of a minor royalty—and an African one at that— it is a dizzying ascension to the global pantheon of royalty. Before our very eyes, Nelson Mandela has become a king among kings and a god among human deities. It doesn’t get more celestial.

    It is going to be a long farewell to Nelson Mandela. In a thousand years, they will still be talking about this man who was neither a military hero nor a religious avatar but who might have effected a paradigm shift in global leadership without being either. There will still be tyrants and sadistic buffoons in power, but it is a teachable moment for global leaders, particularly their African variants; a lesson in Leadership 101.

    A paradigm shift occurs when a man or woman of exceptional vision and genius discovers a fundamental aspect of the nature and principles of a particular problem thus altering its perception and possibilities forever. Gaston Bachelard, the great French mathematician, philosopher and critic, calls it coupure epistemologique or a disruption in the normal order of things. It is not just a triumph for one extraordinary individual but a triumph for humanity as a whole, a potential catalyst for irreversible change.

    This is probably why the public outpouring of grief has been unprecedented. Every corner of the human globe has been mourning its favourite son. The public adulation of this saintly man has been without any parallel in recent history with the crowd of dignitaries at his funeral trumping the epic departure of Winston Churchill almost fifty years earlier. Churchill was a hero to many. But he was not a universally acclaimed hero. Even at his funeral, there were murmurs of disapprobation from die-hard adversaries. This is the ultimate plight of the political hero. Unlike Churchill and other great politicians, Mandela was a sovereign of the moral universe.

    So right before us, we are witnessing the first tentative steps towards the political canonisation of this extraordinary man. Mandela is on his way to becoming a secular saint. Something good has come out of Africa. The first continent which became the last has come first again. Something new always comes out of Africa, but this time it is not political oddities and balls; or self-declared cannibals such as Idi Amin, Marcos Nguema, Samuel Doe and Emperor Jean-Bedel Bokassa.

    To be sure, the contradictions which drive a paradigm shift are not exhausted by the shift itself. They are often supplanted or displaced to another realm of human agency. In other circumstances, revolutionists will stay bray for the blood of oppressors. And it will be foolish and futile to ever imagine that Nelson Mandela has solved all or even most of the problems of South Africa, particularly the problems of racial and economic marginalisation.

    But without political equality, economic equality is a mirage; and without authentic national liberation you cannot even begin to contemplate economic liberation. A population that has been enslaved for centuries cannot become an economic powerhouse by itself overnight. Without the production of modern knowledge and the requisite technological know-how, it will be difficult to leverage political liberation to achieve economic freedom.

    Mandela was a pragmatic visionary. He knew the potential strengths of his South African people as well as their practical weaknesses. He did not suffer mystical delusions. Slaves do not become masters overnight except in a situation of anarchy and protracted chaos. To have insisted on pure justice and outright victory leavened by vengeance was to invite the apocalyptic nightmare that is Haiti to be enacted on African soil. Several centuries before South Africa, runaway African slaves won the military bet but lost the political and economic wager, or waivers if you like.

    It is alright to talk about tolerance, forgiveness and magnanimity, particularly when the shoe is on the other foot and we know from whom compassion is required. But it is also important to remember that there are people who do not forgive or forget. The plight of Haiti is a sad reminder. South Africa was lucky to have a Mandela at the precise historic conjuncture somebody like him was most needed.

    With his avuncular simplicity, his exceptional clarity of mind and purpose, his nobility of soul and above all the overwhelming authority of personal suffering, he was able to rein in and steady the most impatient and starry-eyed idealists among his colleagues and associates who combined the two most outstanding qualities of the revolutionary actor: a passion for justice and equality and a passion for vengeance. He had given everything to the struggle, including his prime and prime happiness. He could not be accused of selling out.

    A man who was born to be a king, Mandela was at once a conservative radical and a radically conservative humanist in the best traditions of those terms. For him, humanity was all one. He was genuinely curious about people and had an uncommon communion with the human soul. His inner essence glowed with affection and warmth for people, irrespective of race, nationality or creed.

    This was why he must have been particularly perplexed by the ideological monstrosity behind the apartheid creed. It was also why he decided to fight the ungodly system with the last drop of his blood. For him, apartheid was not a racial aberration but the concoctions of a few deformed souls who imposed the dogma on an embattled people. It was borne of fear of the other masquerading as the fact of human existence. Those who will subdue the unworthy dogma are not those who have collaborated with it but those who have stoutly and proudly resisted its tyranny.

    All of this does not exhaust the Mandela magic. There are times when actual life imitates art and we may have to borrow a term from dramatic literature in order to plumb the depths of the vastly intriguing and immensely magnetic personality behind the façade of Olympian calm and fortitude. Mandela is the living equivalent of a Deus ex machina or god out of the machine.

    In ancient Greek Drama, a Deus ex machina is a divine contraption lowered on stage when the internal process and inner dynamics of a play could no longer provide a way out or a neat resolution of the conflicts and contradictions arising from the drama. The creative artist seems to surrender his authorial rights to the ultimate creator in a wild and improbable gambit which could only be a testimony to the wondrous ways of God. For some, it is a manifestation of sheer artistic incompetence, while for others it is the ultimate paradox and parable of creation.

    “At any rate”, Leon Trotsky famously thundered, “we shall no longer accept tragedy in which God gives orders and human beings meekly submit”. Yet as in Greek plays which require a Deus ex machina, so also is it the case in the affairs of real men and women. There are times in human affairs that things get so messy as to warrant the introduction of a God-like character.

    The apartheid system had deadlocked into a nasty and bloody stalemate with the potential to infect the whole world. The victims could not militarily prevail and the victors could not politically survive. It required the introduction of a person of extraordinary compassion, tolerance and the superhuman capacity to forgive and forget. This was Nelson Mandela, and by his example he has left the world a better and nobler place than he met it.

    Two moments of Mandela’s magic will be etched forever in human consciousness. First was when he stepped out after 27 years in captivity for the whole world to behold. He was frail but proud and erect ; his head bloodied but unbowed and he was beaming a dignified but inscrutable smile. For many, a coiled mamba was about to be unfurled on South Africa with the possibility of permanent civil war and a millennial bloodbath.

    The second was when the great man stepped out donning the jersey of the South African Rugby Team, the very symbol of apartheid macho. Earlier, Mandela had prevailed on his more impatient colleagues not to replace the logo and emblem of the team. The white populace must be given a sense of belonging in the new South Africa. This was the moment Mandela, by the power of personal example, finally brought down the iron curtain of racial segregation. Many white South Africans openly sobbed.

    Snooper bids a fond farewell to this illustrious son of Africa and scion of the old African kingship system at its most stellar. The tears are not for Mandela but for ourselves and why it often takes wars and strife to find out that irrespective of race, creed, religion and civilisation there is a common humanity that binds all of us together. It is wondrously ironic that it has taken Africa to teach the world that elementary lesson.

  • Mandela: lessons for civics teachers

    Mandela: lessons for civics teachers

    Mandela has shown us that people with vacuous interior are not likely to grow into respectable national or world leaders

    There is no death that does not throw up mourners. Even the most inconsequential of men have people to mourn them. But when the death of an individual turns the globe into a site of mourners for that person, then that person has something that most of his or her contemporaries lack. Mandela’s recent passing has created one of the finest and telling spectacles of global unity in memory. The most glowing praises ever uttered have been rendered and deservedly so for Madiba. Even in Nigeria, many of the country’s institutions and their leaders have held special sessions to talk about Mandela in the most laudatory language. What must not be missed is that the implication of Mandela’s lifelong noble virtues can be a value to be cultivated by peoples of the world, especially Nigeria and its leaders.

    Nigeria’s teachers of civics have very fertile resource materials for the teaching of civics, particularly topics on rights and duties of citizens including their leaders. South Africa’s population is small compared to that of Nigeria. But that South Africa gave the world the first global hero from Africa in modern times is a thing to be explained to students. Mandela, who said clearly that he fought white domination and black domination with equal focus, started his public journey by recognising that he, like other millions of Black South Africans, was a victim of the hate nurtured for the Other, where the inferiorisation of the other is believed to enhance and perpetuate the advantages of the self. He could have, at the end of his incarceration and the end of the world’s worst form of group hate, chosen revenge as a response to his country’s ugly past and as a blueprint for constructing a new South Africa. He could have argued for cleansing of the land, not just through the process of truth and reconciliation but of full disclosure and total restitution, a process that would have led to decades of inter-racial tension and underdevelopment, if not retrogression.

    By mobilising all citizens to forgive and move forward into a future of peace and progress regime for all citizens, Mandela provided exemplary leadership to assist his country give the world the first Rainbow society and a new cultural model that is more profound than the melting pot model that used to be the envy of many societies before the emergence of Mandela’s policy of unfettered multiculturalism. The embodiment of the world’s first Rainbow society could not but be mourned and celebrated by the multiplicity of races that gathered in Soweto last week. Such rainbow reality cultural model as an empowering way to respond to ethnic or racial diversity in modern management of plural societies owes very much to the inner peace enjoyed by Mandela, which in turn engendered his notion of the Self and the Other.

    The significance of an individual’s inner peace thriving in a very large heart as an enhancer of peace for others is best captured in Mandela’s own words: “To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.” To say that Mandela is a world leader is to say the obvious, because he has a philosophy of life that endorses the need for civilised men and women to respect the right of others to live without the fear of domination on account of demographic advantage or better access to the technology of mass violence. The unforgettable lesson from Mandela’s life experience and worldview is the importance that power can be molded to advance the cause of peace, harmony, and development in any country, regardless of the complexity of its cultural and ethnic diversity, once the holder of power has the right value and the big heart to see consistently beyond the self in his or her choice of policies and actions.

    When Mandela said that he does not want just majority rule to replace Apartheid’s minority rule but democratic rule in South Africa, he was teaching the entire world a new lesson about what Ralph Waldo Emerson in his concept of transcendentalism once called the god with a small g in each human being, which can stay repressed, if not properly recognised and cultivated by the individual. Unlike many leaders in other countries, Mandela chose in 1994 not to allow the distractions that seeking advantages for one’s self or for one’s ethnic community over the other usually create for leaders who have failed to commune with the god in them and thus be able to accept that aspiring to be better human beings as leaders is capable of creating a better human community for all.

    Teaching civics in Nigeria after the exit of Madiba should include not just adding the concrete examples of Mandela’s life experience to the list of illustrations of existing concepts but also to the expansion of concepts to be taught to young students in our colleges. Leadership presupposes the readiness of those aspiring to such positions to make sacrifice and never to get tired of making sacrifice on account of the community, whether small like a village or big like a country. If Mandela had chosen to buy armoured cars to travel in, it could not have been hard for the government of his country to buy such gadgets for him, given the amount of sacrifice he had made for the society’s progress. If he had chosen to travel on the road with dozens of land cruisers, the way our own leaders do in Nigeria, nobody would have accused him of asking for too much, given the enormity of what he had given of himself to South Africa. But his soul was too deep, his heart too large, and his mind too broad for him to need such toys and symbols of power and attention, without which a leader in our own country cannot recognise himself in the mirror.

    Mandela’s notion of unity in diversity is best illustrated in the constitution with which he started South Africa’s post-Apartheid rule. The constitution is transparently federal. Mandela’s belief in democratic rule, as distinct from majority rule, did not prevent him from accepting the need to have a federal system of government in a plural society. His notion of national unity did not prevent him from seeing the good in ensuring that no section in a plural society is given an excuse to feel that it is dominated or may be dominated or cheated by another section. Mandela’s emphasis on the equality of all persons, regardless of race or religion, makes it unnecessary for any section to want to dominate other sections or to swear to go to war when other sections raise issues with a constitution that they believe had been imposed on them by departing dictators—military or civilian. Mandela’s acceptance of a federal model has not diminished the sense of unity in South Africa. Instead, it has encouraged his successors to respect the right of the elements of the Rainbow ethos to be and thus sustain the integrity of the rainbow society. Even with the painful history of group hatred arising from primitive handling of racial and ethnic diversity in South Africa before 1990, Nigeria with ethnic diversity that is devoid of dehumanisation of one group by another does not appear to be as united, even after half a century of independence, as South Africa is only eighteen years after South Africa’s independence.

    Mandela has shown us that people with vacuous interior are not likely to grow into respectable national or world leaders. Madiba has shown us that persons incurably infected by the virus of infinite acquisition for themselves cannot become leaders and heroes.

  • PDP’s ‘Mandelas’

    PDP’s ‘Mandelas’

    Ruling party has further ridiculed Nigeria by comparing its ‘founding fathers’ with Mandela

    We all like to associate with good things; but it is insulting for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to compare any of its founding fathers with the former South African President, Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela. The difference between Mandela and the PDP’s founding fathers is like that between heaven and earth. You don’t compare sleep with death.

    Since the passage of this great African and world icon on December 5, tributes have expectedly come in torrents from all over the world. Mandela deserved all the accolades; his type is rare in most generations. I do not know if there is anything new to say by way of eulogising the man, but there have been issues that arose since his death which make localising the passage compelling in a way that it will have meaning to us here beyond just praising the Madiba.

    Hear the PDP: “While Nelson Mandela, the greatest African of the living memory, ended the inhumanity of apartheid, bringing freedom to South Africans, the founding fathers of PDP liberated Nigeria from the vicious clutches of military tyranny and ushered the nation into democracy”. That was the ruling party’s own way of eulogising Mandela. Yet, nothing could be more fallacious than these claims. How can anyone who wants to be truthful to himself say this kind of thing? But when last has the PDP been truthful, even to itself? We know however that in Nigeria, such claims can be made, especially by our politicians because, as I have always argued, everything to them is politics. The truth is that Nigeria’s ruling parties have this uncanny way of attempting to rewrite history. The defunct National Party of Nigeria (NPN) in its bid to ridicule Chief Obafemi Awolowo in the Second Republic (at least so it thought), also claimed that the first television station in Africa was established somewhere in Libya, instead of Ibadan in the then Western Region of Nigeria. Needless to say that the campaign failed.

    But shouldn’t we know the limits of expensive jokes or politics? How can anyone compare Mandela with any of the PDP founding fathers, living or dead? Trust Nigerians, they have since descended on the ruling party as vultures would a rotten corpse. It is unfortunate that the party does not know that the international community has had more than enough to laugh about us; we should therefore not further ridicule our country with such comments. It is even the more fallacious to claim that “the founding fathers of PDP liberated Nigeria from the vicious clutches of military tyranny and ushered the nation into democracy”. Even if this was ever true, has the ruling party not thrown Nigerians that they have been ruling for the past 14 years into the ‘vicious clutches of civilian tyranny’? And, contrary to the PDP’s claim that it has liberated Nigerians, are they (Nigerians) not still in manacles; in which they are likely to remain until the day they know how to insist on one man, one vote?

    What we know as a fact, and which is sad about democracy in the country, is that most of those now enjoying high political offices did little or nothing to bring democracy about. Whenever the history of the struggle is being written, Nigerians know those who fought the democracy fight. How many PDP top shots were in the trenches during the struggle? We still remember those who stood on June 12; we remember those who sat on it; those who knelt on it, those who trampled on it; those who slept on it; those who spat on it, those who danced on it, etc. Even the soldiers who beat a retreat in 1999 know those who made them run; their tails behind their legs. As a matter of fact, it can be argued that the PDP is mismanaging the country because it did not know how we came about democracy. Those who really fought the military to a standstill might not have misruled the country this way. Hardly can people appreciate what they never worked for.

    Mandela, who fought alongside other patriots to end apartheid in South Africa, and despite the awe with which he was held by people, not only in South Africa but globally, despite his acclaimed qualities, was never interested in second term. Here was a man who spent most of his 27 years serving hard labour in Robben Island prison, off Cape Town. Although jailed for life, he was released in 1990 and received a Nobel Prize. He was later elected South Africa’s president in the country’s first multi-racial elections held in 1994. Even the white supremacists that he fought appreciated his essence.

    If he had wanted a second term, perhaps life presidency, he probably would have got it on a platter of gold. Here, people, mostly non-performers cling to political offices as if their lives depend on them. It is in the PDP that an obviously sick governor would go fishing even while it is clear from motion and still pictures that the man is not in a position to catch an ant. It is in the PDP that an ailing president would not want to vacate office even while it is glaring that his health could no longer carry the weight of the enormous responsibility of office. Mandela did not belong to this category of sit-tight leaders.

    Right now, second term is at the core of the crisis that has torn the ruling party apart. In some cases, even second term would not do as we witnessed in the Obasanjo presidency: baba wanted a third term! Today, people are busy arguing over whether the president signed a one-term pact and the presidency is on the defensive. What is particularly painful is that the people clamouring for more than one term in office do not have any tangible thing to point to as their achievements beyond their usual deceitful backslapping in their political party. Mandela gave his all, including his life, in the struggle to emancipate his people from the shackles of apartheid.

    The PDP should stop disgracing our country in the comity of nations. It has had 14 years to etch its name in gold but has failed so far; but all hope is not lost if only it can redeem itself before 2015. As William Shakespeare observed, “some are born great; some achieve greatness and some have greatness thrust upon them”. Unlike ‘PDP’s Mandelas’, despite the fact that Nelson Mandela was born great (born to the Thembu royal family), he also worked hard to sustain his greatness, rather than have greatness thrust upon him. How many people that the PDP is placing in his class can we say the same of? Mandela went to jail for political reasons, the few persons in the PDP that had gone to jail did so for corruption. Majority of them who should be cooling their heels in jailhouses are still walking the streets free.

    It would have been better for the PDP not to eulogise Mandela than ridicule the man the way it did. By the ruling party’s standards, it could talk of its own Mandelas, that is ‘PDP’s Mandelas’. After all, ‘in the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is king’. I have always argued that there is nothing on earth that does not have a fake. Remember the advert of that analgesic? So, if it is not Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela, it cannot be the same as Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela; the Madiba of whom the world sings.

    Adieu Mandela, the ‘troublemaker’ with a cause.