Tag: Manipulation

  • ‘How I escaped govt’s manipulation during poll’

    •INEC swears in seven RECs

    Ex-Ondo State Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) Mr. Segun Agbaje has recalled how he escaped the government’s alleged manipulation during the presidential election.

    He was among the seven RECs sworn in yesterday by the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu. Others are Yahaya Bello, Baba Abba Yusuf, Emmanuel Alex Hart, Uthman Abdulraham Ajidagba, Mohammed Magaji Ibrahim and Cyril Omorogbe.

    Yusuf and Agbaje are returning for the second term. Their postings will be announced later.

    Agbaje, who was advising his colleagues on how to end well, said he received a call from the governor about 1:30am to meet him at the Government House for a discussion, which he turned down.

    Not satisfied, he said the governor offered to meet him at his home (Agbaje’s), which he also said was not possible, as it was an ungodly hour.

    Agbaje said if he had honoured the invitation, he could have been blackmailed to do the bidding of the government.

    The REC said he was shocked the next day when he received a call from Abuja trying to confirm a report that he collected N50 million from the governor at the supposed meeting, which was not held.

    Thanking the INEC chairman for the confidence reposed in them, he said they would not disappoint the commission and the country.

    Yakubu urged the RECs to maintain openness and be firm in the performance of their duties.

    He told them that the commission would conduct four by-elections and two governorship elections before the 2019 general election.

    The INEC chairman said the elections are to fill positions in Takum State Constituency in Taraba State, Lokoja/Koton-Karfe Federal Constituency in Kogi State, Bauchi South Senatorial District and Katsina North Senatorial District.

    He added that governorship polls would hold in Ekiti and Osun states.

     

  • Family of sentenced monarch alleges manipulation

    The family of the embattled Unuevworo (prime minister) of Ekpan in Uvwie council of Delta State, Chief Newton Agbofodoh, has alleged foul play in the circumstances leading to his death sentence by a Delta High Court last week.

    The first son of the ruler, Darlington Newton, who spoke at a news conference in Warri yesterday, alleged that there was a political undercurrent to the judgment, vowing that the family will challenge the decision at the Appeal Court.

    Chief Agbofodoh, who was arrested on June 17, 2016, on allegations of murder and others, was sentenced to death by hanging by the state High Court 4, sitting in Asaba last Thursday.

    At a press briefing, Darlington Newton claimed his father’s fate is orchestrated by politicians, who accused him of not supporting them in 2015, adding that his father was convicted on the testimony of a witness, who earlier denied having dealings with Ekpan or its people.

    He alleged that the grievance against the sacked chairman of Uvwie, Henry Baro Minabonware, was extended to “my father who is neither a member of PDP or APC. It’s just because Baro is my father’s nephew. My dad was accused of not working for PDP in 2015”.

    ‘’Sentencing my father, Chief Agbofodoh, to death, for the murder of John Mogidi, on the testimony of Innocent Chukwuma Akemu …raises more doubts because the same Innocent Akemu, a PDP member, initially said he doesn’t know anyone in Ekpan”.

    While calling on the Federal Government, and the traditional institution to intervene to save his father over the perceived taboo in Urhobo land, especially Uvwie, Newton vowed that the family will head to the Appeal Court and explore all legal avenues “until justice is served”.

  • Families petition NJC, Presidency over trial ‘manipulation’

    The Integrity Leadership Organisation, a non-governmental organisation (NGO), has petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC) over alleged manipulation of the trial of suspects arrested in the alleged murder of a World Bank consultant, Dr Ayodeji Daramola, and the late Tunde Omojola.

    The duo were allegedly murdered between 2005 and 2006 in Ekiti State.

    Daramola was reportedly murdered at Ijan-Ekiti on August 14, 2006 while Omojola was killed during 2005 councillorship election crisis at Ifaki-Ekiti.

    In a petition, dated June 16, by its Ekiti State Coordinator, Lekan Oyediran, and received in the Office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, on June 23, the group said it was writing on behalf of the families of the deceased.

    The deaths occurred during political crises arising from the governorship and councillorship elections.

    It pointed NJC’s attention to reports of alleged manipulation in the consolidated murder trial of Daramola and Omojola in the Ekiti State High Court, Ado-Ekiti, in an alleged connivance of the governor with a section of the Judiciary to save the suspects in the murder.

    The petition was also copied to Acting President Yemi Osinbajo; Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Ibrahim Idris, Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS), Lawal Daura and the Chief Judge of Ekiti State, Mr Justice Ayodeji Daramola.

    The petitioners claimed that 11 “fake” witnesses were listed from Ifaki-Ekiti home country of Omojola while six were listed to come from Ijan-Ekiti, Daramola’s home town.

    It averred that following investigations at Ijan-Ekiti and Ifaki-Ekiti, it was discovered none of the witnesses was aware of any hearing of the murder case in court.

    The petition reads: “In Ijan-Ekiti, there was nobody called Kehinde Femi at 6, Ikota Street, as the house was fully rented out to strangers, according to the online publication.

    “It also reported that there was nobody called Edward Kehinde in Dr Daramola’s house, adjacent to Ujilogun Grammar School, as the house had been rented out to a sports club called Phoenix Athletic Sports Club and a football academy that conducts football coaching for Ekiti youths.

    “In Ifaki-Ekiti, Suleiman Bakare, Omojola’s brother-in-law and a banker living in Lagos, who is the authentic author of the petition on the murder of Omojola and who is also a purported witness listed as living at P7, Ona Oja St, Ifaki-Ekiti, said he was not aware that he was a witness in the trial.

    “It is the same denial by another purported witness, Sule Aliru Olatunji, who was put in a newspaper report in 2007 with his photograph by alleged Fayose’s men as having disowned his earlier statement to exonerate the governor only for Aliru to renounce the publication as a fraud to save the suspects in the murder case.

    “It was also discovered in Ifaki that witness Number Four in the alleged witness list, Suleiman Labaika of Ilero Quarters, Ifaki-Ekiti, was Suleiman Bakare’s brother and in fact was the councillorship candidate in the ill-fated election. Labaika knew nothing about the list and in fact he was not aware that a trial is ongoing in Omojola’s murder.

    “The same with Osenatu Suleiman, mother of both Bakare and Labaika, who knew nothing about the ongoing trial, while Ogunleye Akeem, Suleiman Bakare’s nephew, would be hearing about the trial for the first time.”

    The petitions also pointed the attention of the NJC to the alleged travesty of justice in a murder trial in which the chief suspect is said to be the chief prosecutor in a trial that the families of the deceased, who are also the chief complainants and petitioners, were kept in the dark.

  • NSE goes tough on market manipulation, illegal dealings

    NSE goes tough on market manipulation, illegal dealings

    Authorities at the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) are proposing a four-level penalty for market manipulation and illegal dealings as part of efforts to tighten loopholes and enhance the price discovery mechanism at the stock market.

    The NSE is finalising an amendment to its rules to provide multi-level stiffer sanctions as deterrents to market manipulation and illegal market dealings. A draft of the amendment titled “prohibition of market manipulation and illegal market dealings” showed that the Exchange was seeking to impose more sanctions on market manipulations and illegal dealings.

    According to the draft, the Exchange may impose all or any of four penalties when it determines that a contravention has occurred. The Exchange may impose a fine equivalent to three times the amount of profit or gain derived by the dealing member in the alleged manipulation or illegal market dealing, which fine must be paid within 10 business days of imposition.

    Also, the dealing member shall be placed on suspension for a period to be determined by the Exchange which shall not be less than 30 calendar days. The Exchange shall also forthwith withdraw the registration of the authorised clerk or clerks involved in the transaction.The Exchange shall also cancel all of the affected trades based on inappropriate market behavior.

    The new rules prohibit stockbrokers from directly or indirectly use or knowingly participate in the use of any manipulative, improper, false or deceptive practice of trading in a security listed on the Exchange which practice creates or might create a false or deceptive appearance of the trading activity in connection with; or an artificial price for, that security either for his own account or on behalf of another person.

    The rules also prohibit dealing members from placing an order to buy or sell listed securities which, to his or her knowledge will, if executed, have the effect contemplated in paragraph creating false or deceptive market.

    The rules describe manipulative, improper, false or deceptive trading practices to include approving or entering an order to buy or sell a security traded on the floor of the Exchange which involves no change in the beneficial ownership of that security.

    Manipulative, improper, false and deceptive trading practices also include approving or entering an order to buy or sell a security traded on the floor of the Exchange with the knowledge that an opposite order or orders of substantially the same size at substantially the same time and at substantially the same price, have been or will be entered by or for the same or different persons with the intention of creating a false or deceptive appearance of active trading in connection with; or an artificial market price for, that security.

    Also, any stockbroker that approve or enter orders to buy a security traded on the floor of the Exchange at successively higher prices or orders to sell a security listed at successively lower prices for the purpose of unduly or improperly influencing the market price of such security as well as anyone that approve or enter an order at or near the close of the market, the primary purpose of which is to change or maintain the closing price of a security traded on the floor of the Exchange shall be deemed to have engaged in market manipulation.

  • NYC under “serious” manipulation, says minister

    The federal government would no longer waste tax payers’ money to fund the Nigeria Youth Council (NYC).

    Minister of Youth and Sports, Mr. Solomon Dalung, made this disclosure in Abuja during the end of the year ceremony of the Peace Corps of Nigeria (PCN) with the theme: ‘The role of youth organisation in the promotion of social change: the future of the Nigerian state.’

    Dalung, who alleged that youths are under serious manipulation by politicians and other stakeholders, said the decision not to fund any youth group is due to the leadership tussle rocking the organisation, with six people laying claim to its headship, coupled with a litany of court cases instituted by interested parties.

    The minister promised that by next year, a committee would be set up to register youth organisations, while urging youths to shun violence and embrace peace.

    He noted: “If the Nigerian youths are yearning for change and now the change has come, they should behave themselves. One of the problems of the Nigerian youth today is that they are divided among themselves. They are divided over the question of leadership and I keep repeating without fear or favour that they have allowed us ‘politicians’ to continue to manipulate them.

    “They are under serious manipulation and they operate under the instructions of those that manipulate them. This was why when I came into office as a minister; I found it difficult to take sides.

    “In a situation where I have over six people claiming to be leaders of the youth council, I cannot waste so much time in seeing how to reconcile anybody, as every effort to reconcile them in the past have failed. As a minister, I have withdrawn that right that there is no youth organisation recognized by the Ministry of Youths and Sports. As a government we will not do any business with them. We will not use the tax payers’ money wasting it on those that are fighting.

    “In the New Year, we would set up a committee that will register youth organisations. All those going about causing confusion in the youth group should go and reorganise themselves. But for now, we will not spend a kobo on briefcase youth organisations since the law requires them to have offices in not less than 24 states in Nigeria. We cannot endorse fraud.”

  • Manipulation can dampen employees’ morale

    Manipulation is defined as the act of making someone think and behave exactly the way you want him to, by skilfully deceiving or influencing him. Though the person manipulating the other person or people may have his way for some time, the strategy of manipulation is not the one that is enduring – it does not last! When employees feel betrayed or manipulated, management’s attempts at motivation cannot achieve any positive result. By way of illustration, according to research, a giant supermarket chain in Florida was well known for its warm relationship with its fifty thousand odd employees.

     

    Publication

    The company published a bi-weekly bulletin that listed all the births, deaths, marriages and serious illnesses of employees and their families. For more than twenty years, the company president had sent personalised cards to the families of everyone listed in the bulletin. But when a new president was appointed in 1984, he decided to discontinue sending cards for births, marriages and illnesses. It is far better not to do something than to commit yourself to something you may not be able to deliver.

     

    Another development

    In another development, research has confirmed that when the brown aircraft of People Express took to the skies in 1980, its founders initiated a social experiment on the grandest of scales. It was probably the most elaborate attempt at corporate democracy ever. According to Donald Calvin Burr, president of People Express, “The single predominant reason why I cared about starting a new company was to try and develop a better way for people to work together.”

    So many people flocked to join the company because of this message, that only one out of a hundred applicants could be accepted. “You’re not a commodity,” Burr would stress to new recruits at the end of intensive five-week-long, six-day-a-week (without pay) training programmes. “You’re not a beaten-down worker. You’re a manager. You’re an owner.” And apparently, he meant it.

     

    Expert’s view

    Azriel Winnett, a business management expert says there were no supervisors, secretaries or vice-presidents at People Express. All employees were given the title of manager. They were rotated among jobs frequently – in the air as flight attendants, at the airports as ticket agents, or behind the scenes in the accounting or scheduling departments. One third of the corporate profit was distributed to employees. They all owned a minimum of a hundred shares of the airline’s stock. “When you fly People’s Express, an owner is never more than a few steps away,” boasted one its newspaper adverts.

     

    Elated employee

    Fired with an infectious excitement, the “owner-managers” would work ten to twelve hours per day. Since per capita productivity was high, People Express operated with about fifty staff per airplane, about half the industry average. Burr was determined that the company should become “a role model for other airlines and businesses”, and it did. Not only had it become the nation’s fifth largest airline within five years, but it had become famous for its human management philosophy. “Anyone who isn’t studying People Express and the way they’re managing people is out of their minds,” proclaimed a Harvard professor of repute. Two years later, People Express was no more. Drained by an excessively rapid expansion, Burr was forced to sell the entire airline before it was too late.

     

    Reasons for collapse

    The reasons for the company’s failure will probably be debated in business schools for many years to come, as business reporter Robert Levering points out in his fascinating book, A Great Place to Work. But parallel to the financial crash, a failure of a different kind became evident in the course of time. For all his ingenuity as a motivational expert, Donald Burr’s grand scheme for ultimate corporate democracy had long turned sour in the eyes of many of his employees. Levering masterfully analyses the reasons for this in his book. During the final week of the airline’s existence as an independent entity, he talked at length with numerous People Express employees. They talked of feeling being “manipulated”. They stressed that this feeling had manifested on a large scale long before the airline flew into financial turbulence.

     

    Abuse

    There is a special excitement about being involved in launching a company, and part of the People Express experience has occurred in countless other companies, too. Everyone feels needed and useful. The “partners” at People Express felt like winners, despite the long, uncompensated hours of work. But in this kind of situation, it is easy for the people at the top to purposefully prolong the start-up phase, and to take advantage of their workers’ love of excitement and novelty. The very responsibility given to the employees can become deceptive. Their very loyalty can become an object of manipulation.

    And although an elaborate communication system was in place at People Express, it worked well only when the going was good. But there were no viable mechanisms for handling employee complaints and concerns. The system made no provision for conflicts, because it assumed a kind of everlasting harmony between the employee-managers and the top executives.

     

    Realisation

    At People Express, many employees discovered that broken promises led to broken dreams. Perhaps the big-wigs were thinking to themselves: “Tell people whatever will make them feel good. Then they’ll work harder, and we’ll make more money.” And as any politician knows, you can win votes by making promises, but voters eventually expect you to deliver.

     

    Last words

    In an atmosphere of trust, communication can flourish. But trust is not something that can be turned on at will, like a tap. Therefore, every corporate organisation that wants to succeed in business should desist from manipulating its employees or making empty promises to them because deploying this deceitful strategy can be counter-productive in the long run.

    Till we meet on Wednesday.

     

     

     

    •GOKE ILESANMI, Managing Consultant/CEO of Gokmar Communication Consulting, is an International Platinum Columnist, Certified Public Speaker/MC, Communication Specialist, Motivational Speaker and Career Management Coach. He is also a Book Reviewer, Biographer and Editorial Consultant.

     

     

    Tel: 08055068773; 08187499425

    Email: gokeiles2010@gmail.com

    Website: www.gokeilesanmi.com