Tag: Mansions

  • Obnoxious mansions as luxurious prisons

    Osbourne Road, Ikoyi Lagos is one of the havens of the nouveau riche in Nigeria with a concentration of jaw dropping and awe-inspiring mansions like homes in paradise. Such avenues of the wealthy and classy are common in our metropolitan centres, sheltering the powerful in politics and the business barons or perhaps the big men in drug and crime.

    Though, Voice of Nigeria where I work is also in Ikoyi, in fact not too much of a distance to Osborne, I have never taken so much interest in this posh neighbourhood of the mighty until last weekend when the providence of being a Muslim professional forced me to have a good look of the area. It was while returning from an engagement of Muslim professionals with the Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo.

    As we manoeuvred round the circular Osbourne, a colleague familiar with the area identified each property and its owner, also regaling us with their atrocious automobiles worth millions in dollars, not just in naira. He pointed at the luxurious house a certain former governor. He pointed at a castle like or palatial mansion of a wealthy madam reputed to be the fourth costliest in entire Africa and I nodded. We saw the homes of many foreign diplomats nestling on Osborne, numerous mansions of mindless dimensions.

    One thing I also noted about all these obnoxious and profane palaces is their high Iron wrought gates of handcrafted design and monumental concrete fences akin to walls of correctional facilities, the euphemism for prison yards in America. And I ask if you must live in luxury, must it be behind prison walls?

    What a contradiction in the life of men and women of means and grandeur. These posh palatial and magnificent castle-like homes strewn around Ikoyi, Victoria Island, Lekki, Ajah, Magodo and other exclusive areas of Lagos and the larger Nigeria tells of the futility and vanity of our acquisition. Why build a house in which you will be afraid to live so, you have to wall up yourself? Why build a house whose cost of maintenance will ultimately outstrip the total cost of construction? Why build a house which in your twilight years too big for you to walk round? Why build a house when at old age, you become lonely or isolated in it beginning to regret that you could have done something more average and manageable? Why build a house that you would be afraid to sell off, yet has outgrown your need?

    I have heard of multiple rooms hilltop mansions of our former rulers. When their owners die, they are either abandoned to be overgrown with weeds or to be cheaply sold off by ill-bred children and family members with least appreciation for such monuments. Some of such homes eventually become criminal havens or hideouts. They become for beggars and itinerants and the homeless or the insane. They lost value despite their humongous cost.

    If you are crazily rich, my advice is you build mansions for yourself in paradise not on earth. How you might ask? Build hospitals, build religious houses, build courthouses for the government, build markets for the common man, build police stations and detention centres for public use, build conveniences that meet the emergency needs of road users, offices that can be rented cheaply, low cost houses whose payment terms are flexible for salary earners and struggling career men and women, build clean inns and decent motels for wayfarers, libraries for higher institutions, even for neighbourhood primary and secondary schools, buy and put mass transit buses that the public can ride on subsidy.

     

    • Abdulwarees is an assistant director of Strategic Planning & Corporate Development at Voice of Nigeria. korewarith@yahoo.com, 08090585723

     

  • EFCC to seize Diezani’s, Aluko’s Dubai mansions

    EFCC to seize Diezani’s, Aluko’s Dubai mansions

    $1.5b oil contract probe widens

    Barely 48 hours after the US Department of Justice released details of how part of the $1.5billion oil production contracts funds were laundered, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is set to seize a mansion belonging to one of the suspects, Kola Aluko, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE).

    Besides, the commission will apply for the forfeiture of two houses belonging to a former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, who was implicated by the U.S. authorities as a beneficiary of the laundered cash.

    About five luxury properties have also been traced to a former official of the defunct Oceanic Bank.

    All the properties in question have been identified and documented for forfeiture with the UAE authorities, The Nation learnt yesterday.

    Nigeria signed six agreements with the UAE on January 19, 2016 following a state visit by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The pact includes Judicial Agreements on Extradition, Transfer of Sentenced Persons, Mutual Legal Assistance on Criminal Matters, and Mutual Legal Assistance on Criminal and Commercial Matters (the recovery and repatriation of stolen wealth).

    Besides, the luxury properties in the United States, the EFCC believes Aluko and Mrs. Alison-Madueke allegedly acquired others with the laundered funds.

    According to a source, who pleaded not to be named because he is not allowed to talk to the media on the matter, all the suspicious assets have been located in the highbrow Jumeirah, which is the most expensive and exclusive area in Dubai.

    But of the eight identified, two apartments linked with Mrs Alison-Madueke are marked as J5 Emirates Hills (30million Dirham) and E146 Emirates Hills valued at 44million Dirham.

    For “security reasons”, the addresses of the mansions of Aluko and the ex-Oceanic Bank official, a woman, have not been disclosed.

    The EFCC plans to release the details later.

    A source in the commission said: “The EFCC still has a valid Mareva Injunction to freeze some foreign accounts and seize some assets linked with Diezani and her business associates in the United Kingdom and some jurisdictions.

    “Some of the offshore financial institutions, where accounts are frozen, include BNP Paribas (Switzerland), LGT Bank (Switzerland), Standard Chartered Bank (London),Barclays Bank (London), Standard Energy (Voduz, Switzerland), HSBC (London), Corner Bank (Lugano, Switzerland) and Deutsche Bank (Geneva).

    “Besides the luxury properties traced to Diezani and Aluko in the US, we have identified more in Dubai.

    “So far, we have commenced the process of ensuring the forfeiture of these assets by the suspects. The EFCC is also verifying the assets linked with Aluko’s business partner, Chief Jide Omokore in Dubai too.

    “All the steps taken so far are in line with the relevant laws in the UAE and the six agreements signed with Nigeria when President Buhari went on an official trip.”

    According to the source, the EFCC believes that “some of the assets were bought with part of the $1.5billion oil production contracts.

    ”These oil barons and their ilk acquired these properties when Dubai was a safe haven for looted funds. But the UAE has strengthened its laws in a manner that there is no more hidden place for the corrupt,” the source said, adding that the only hurdle the EFCC has to cross is the legal process in the UAE to retrieve the assets. “We are already employing the Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement to get this done.” He said.

    The Federal Government has ratified all the agreements with the UAE. This development will hasten asset recovery and retrieval of looted funds.

    “We will do our best to comply with their legal procedure,” the source said.

    “Statutorily, we have succeeded in establishing that the EFCC is empowered to confiscate the affected assets. We are invoking sections 7 of 28 and 34 of the EFCC (Establishment Act) 2004 and Section 13(1) of the Federal High Court Act, 2004.”

    Section 7 says: “The commission has power to (a) cause any investigations to be conducted as to whether any person, corporate body or organization has committed any offence under this Act or other law relating to economic and financial crimes.

    “(b) Cause investigations to be conducted into the properties of any person if it appears to the commission that the person’s lifestyle and extent of the properties are not justified by his source of income.”

    Sections 28 and 34 of the EFCC (Establishment Act) 2004 and Section 13(1) of the Federal High Court Act, 2004 empower the anti-graft agency to invoke Interim Assets Forfeiture Clause.

    “Section 28 of the EFCC Act reads: ‘Where a person is arrested for an offence under this Act, the Commission shall immediately trace and attach all the assets and properties of the person acquired as a result of such economic or financial crime and shall thereafter cause to be obtained an interim attachment order from the Court.’

    Section 13 of the Federal High Court Act reads in part: “The Court may grant an injunction or appoint a receiver by an interlocutory order in all cases in which it appears to the Court to be just or convenient so to do.

    (2) Any such order may be made either unconditionally or on such terms and conditions as the Court thinks just.”

  • EFCC seizes three mansions from Shema

    EFCC seizes three mansions from Shema

    Detained former Katsina State Governor  Ibrahim Shema’s three mansions have been seized over his alleged involvement in a N74.6billion fraud. The houses remain seized until the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) concludes its probe of the allegation.

    Shema was subjected to another round of grilling yesterday by the commission.

    Operatives of the anti-graft agency stormed Katsina on Monday following preliminary interaction with the ex-governor.

    The detectives sealed off the ex-governor’s houses at 1 GRA Modoji Road, Barhim Estate, Madachi Road and Makera Estate, Kirni Road.

    A source in the EFCC, who pleaded not to be named because he is not authorised to talk to the media, said: “Our investigative team on Monday grilled the ex-governor for some hours on more contracts executed during his tenure.

    “Also, in line with the ongoing probe, we have placed three houses of the ex-governor in Katsina under Interim Assets Forfeiture  – in line with Sections 28 and 34 of the EFCC (Establishment Act) 2004 and Section 13(1) of the Federal High Court Act, 2004.”

    Section 28 of the EFCC Act reads: ‘Where a person is arrested for an offence under this Act, the Commission shall immediately trace and attach all the assets and properties of the person acquired as a result of such economic or financial crime and shall thereafter cause to be obtained an interim attachment order from the Court.’

    Section 13 of the Federal High Court Act reads in part: “The Court may grant an injunction or appoint a receiver by an interlocutory order in all cases in which it appears to the Court to be just or convenient so to do.

    “Any such order may be made either unconditionally or on such terms and conditions as the Court thinks just.”

    Responding to a question, the EFCC source added: “We have restricted the movement of the ex-governor to the country until the conclusion of the investigation.

    “Shema is still in our custody. We have a warrant to detain him for a while.”

    Following a petition by the government of Katsina State, the EFCC quizzed Shema on alleged diversion of N18.6billion by himself, his sons and cronies.

     

    It also asked the ex-governor to account for alleged mismanagement of over N56billion in seven years and N30billion security votes by the Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs.

    Shema’s Media Team head, Oluwabusola Olawale, in a statement in Abuja, said: “We have reiterated it on different occasions that former Governor Ibrahim Shehu Shema has nothing to fear and he is ever ready to defend himself, but he should not be subjected to political and media trial.

    “All he wants is fairness, justice and equity in accordance with the rule of law. Former Governor Shema left Katsina State as a debt-free state despite the massive infrastructural development during his eight year tenure.”

  • Mansions begging for occupants

    Mansions begging for occupants

    •Landlords overprice properties in Abuja

    It is widely believed that the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) lacks enough accommodation for its teeming population. But, surprisingly, Nduka Chiejina discovers that the city has many overpriced estates that are begging for tenants.

     

    The Abuja landscape is dotted with state-of-the-art buildings that are unoccupied. These buildings are found mainly in Maitama, Asokoro, Katampe Extension and Wuse Two.

    The history of unoccupied buildings dates back to the military era when some wealthy Nigerians and foreigners with connections to influential government figures acquired plots of land, developed and stayed in them. But, when they lost power and influence, they moved out of Abuja or tried to sell the property.

    It is being alleged that most completed but unoccupied buildings belong to some people who illegally acquired huge wealth and cannot defend the sources. They include politicians and senior government officials accused of looting the treasury, who resorted to either buying property with their loots or simply acquiring new plots and developing them.

    Many of such houses have remained unoccupied because the owners have placed them in the market at exorbitant rates and out of the reach of honest citizens with genuine interest to stay in such houses.

    The Abuja city, referred to as the Federal Capital City (FCC) in the masterplan, has become a veritable ground for money launderers and suspected treasury looters and their desire to maintain a very high taste, in the absence of legitimate income, has left them with the option of demanding very high rents on their property.

    Since most people cannot afford the tastefully finished houses, they are left largely unoccupied.

    At the popular Area 11 junction, there is a massive estate, which people allege belongs to a former Head of State. The estate though has some tenants, many of the flats have remained unoccupied because of the high rent.

    In Wuse Zone One, a large complex of apartments belonging to a famous business mogul from the Northwest, has been in the hands of squatters for almost 10 years and there appears to be nothing the businessman can do to change the situation. In fact, the squatters have partitioned the flats and are sub-letting portions of their flats to other ‘tenants.

    In recent times, the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) had warned that it would levy ground rents on unoccupied buildings to force the owners to put the buildings up for rent, instead of having unoccupied buildings dotting the landscape, with their attendant risks; they could be flash points or hideouts for criminals.

    Investigations showed that except where the landlord has a human face, it is virtually impossible to get a room and parlour for less than N450,000 per annum; and the more the number of rooms, the higher the price. There is no three-bedroom flat in the FCC that goes for less than N1.2 million per annum. Some landlords, agents and estate managers and valuers have cultivated the habit of demanding two years’ rent from prospective tenants.

    In the satellite towns, because the demand far outstrips the supply, many owners and agents have resorted to demanding one-and -a-half or two years’ upfront payment from new tenants.

    Another reason for the preponderance of unoccupied buildings in Abuja is the greed of registered and unregistered estate agents/valuers and developers. The tradition in the city is for estate agents and valuers to inflate the prices of properties in their care, most times without the knowledge of the owners.

    The districts that have the most number of unoccupied buildings are Maitama and Asokoro. There, the owners are former government officials and some rich Nigerians and individuals of questionable character. The owners have been known to hand the buildings over to estate agents at a reasonable rate, but the greed of the agents have resulted to the buildings remaining in the market for years and, eventually, falling to ruins because the agents refuse to give them out at the rate the owners have instructed them.

    It is difficult to see the owners of many houses in Abuja as agents in charge will not arrange a meeting between them and potential tenants.

    These developments have led to a glut of houses in the FCC and many Nigerians are only waiting for the day something would happen to force a burst in the real estate market in Abuja, thus bringing down the prices of houses.

    The wait may be long, but the fact remains that many buildings in Abuja City are wasting away while many Nigerians with genuine need for shelter are either forced to cough out large sums of money as rents, or they shelter in the satellite towns all of which are over crowded and lack basic amenities and infrastructure compared to the FCC.

    The indomitable spirit of Nigerians can also be seen at play where some of these unoccupied houses have been taken over by illegal squatters who neither pay rent nor attempt to carry out repairs on the buildings when the need arises.

    It is being envisaged that Abuja development may result in a property rate crash, the type that happened in the United States that reverberated as the global economic crunch.

    However, the effect of it, if indeed it happens in Nigeria would be different, because most of the property owners are looters who are privately funded.

    The effect of such a development would weigh more on the owners who will lose substantial part of their investment, rather than a national economic collapse, which resulted in the the in the early 2000s,

    Gwarimpa district was noted for the high number of squatters occupying the government buildings, but when most of buildings changed hands many of the squatters were ejected from the FHA and now Gwarimpa has lost the tag of ‘squatters’ settlement.

    The unoccupied building syndrome is not restricted to residential properties alone, many commercial buildings equally litter the city with vacant shopping and office spaces being more in number than those in business.