Tag: Melaye

  • Recall: Why court can’t save Melaye, by Kogi West voters

    Recall: Why court can’t save Melaye, by Kogi West voters

    •Court to hear case next Monday

    About 188,521 voters in Kogi West Senatorial District, seeking Senator Dino Melaye’s recall, have said the lawmaker cannot be saved by the court.

    According to them, they have complied with the legal requirements to ensure the success of the recall process.

    They have given detailed reasons why they want Melaye recalled and urged a Federal High Court in Abuja, before which Melaye’s suit against his recall was pending, not to restrain the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from performing its constitutional duties.

    They noted that while Melaye was not protected by any law from being recalled, Section 69(1) and (2) of the Constitution grants registered voters the right to recall an erring legislator upon losing confidence in him/her.

    The registered voters said there was contradiction in the senator’s position, who they said claimed that the signatures accompanying the petition against him were those of dead people and were forged.

    On the other hand, the voters said Melaye sought to restrain INEC from conducting a verification and authentication exercise on the petition and the signatures.

    They faulted Melaye’s suit, describing it as premature.

    They argued that Melaye cannot hide under the fundamental rights enforcement procedure to challenge his recall by merely pleading lack of fair hearing.

    They said the option opened to him was for Melaye to await the outcome of his recall process, which he can only query by way of a judicial review.

    These formed part of the arguments contained in a bundle of documents filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, Abuja by the 188,521 registered voters in Melaye’s Senatorial District, who signed the petition for his recall.

    The documents were filed on behalf of the voters by three individuals – Chief Olowo Cornelius, John D. Anjorin and Mallam Yusuf Adamu – who said they were acting for themselves and the 188,521 registered voters.

    The documents filed by their lawyer Chief Anthony Adeniyi include motion by Cornelius, Anjorin and Adamu to be named as co-defendants in the case and their joint response to the substantive suit by Melaye.

    On why they were necessary parties in the suit, the three said they coordinated the petition against Melaye’s recall and the signatures of voters submitted to INEC.

    They said since the suit was mainly against the recall process, which they engineered, it was ideal that the case be decided with their involvement.

    On why they seek Melaye’s recall, Cornelius stated in a supporting affidavit that the electorate in Kogi West were tired of the senator’s conflicting and confusing roles in the Senate.

    He noted that while Melaye has barely spent two years in the Senate, he was preparing “seriously” to contest a councillorship position in his ward in Ijumu Local Government.

    Melaye actually made this fact public when, in paragraph 20 of the affidavit supporting his originating summons, he claimed: “I am interested in contesting for a councillorship position in my Local Government Area, Ijumu…”

    Cornelius said: “Since he (Melaye) cannot simultaneously hold the offices of a senator and councillor, his constituents are voting more competent, reliable and worthy replacement to represent them in the Senate.

    “Before the election, he claimed he had eight university degrees from universities within Nigeria and abroad, and particularly from Harvard University. It turned out that he did not attend Harvard University and the best of the certificates he parades is a 3rd Class.

    “He (Melaye) was elected because he was sponsored by the APC (All Progressives Congress), and now he has taken up arms against the party and the leaders of the party at the state and national level.

    “None of the numerous motions and Bills he claimed to have moved or facilitated in the Senate is of any direct benefit to the state in general and to Kogi West in particular.

  • INEC asks court to set aside interim order on Melaye’s recall

    INEC asks court to set aside interim order on Melaye’s recall

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has prayed a Federal High Court in Abuja to set aside its July 6 order directing parties in a suit by Senator Dino Melaye (Kogi West), to maintain status quo pending the determination of the plaintiff’s motion on notice.

    INEC also urged the court to discard Melaye’s motion on notice for interlocutory injunction and proceed to promptly determine the substantive case on the grounds that time was of the essence.

    INEC contended that it has 90 days under Section 69 of the Constitution, within which to conduct a referendum for Melaye’s recall, having received a petition from the senator’s district to that effect.

    It claimed that it will do no one any good for the court to waste its precious time considering Melaye’s motion on notice for interlocutory injunction when it could safely proceed to hear and determine Melaye’s main case filed on June 23, 2017.

    INEC’s said these in three separate documents it filed on July 14, which were brought to the court’s attention yesterday.

    The documents include a summons for accelerated hearing of the case; motion on notice for and order setting aside the order made on June 6 and defendant’s counter-affidavit against the plaintiff’s originating summons filed on June 23, 2017.

    INEC said the order made in its absence has served the sole purpose of preventing it from performing its constitutional responsibilities.

    It said it had planned to make public its report of the verification on August 19.

    INEC accused Melaye of misrepresenting facts and suppressing material facts in allegedly misleading the court to grant the ex-parte order.

    It added: “Since the ex-parte interim order of injunction to maintain status quo was served on the defendant/applicant (INEC)on July 10, 2017, the order has hindered the defendant from further action on the recall process notwithstanding the fact that time is of the essence in carrying out its duties.

    INEC argued that under Section 69 of the Constitution, it has the duty to process the petition against Melaye and conduct a referendum with 90 day, a duty it believed the court cannot stop under any guise.

    It said: “The last day for submission of application by interested observers, last day for submission of names of verification agents for the member sought to be recalled, stakeholders meeting, conduct of verification and declaration of the outcome of verification have been slated to hold on July 31, August 10, 15 and 19.”

    Attacking the competence of Melaye’s suit, INEC noted that it was merely predicated on questions bordering on the propriety or otherwise of the petition for his recall by registered voters in his senatorial district.

    It added: “The plaintiff has no legal right in the matter of the petition to seek for any order of this court to restrain the defendant from performing its duties. The plaintiff will not be prejudiced if the reliefs sought for in the originating summons is refused and dismissed as the balance of convenience is not in favour of the plaintiff.”

    Yesterday, INEC’s lawyer Suleiman Ibrahim informed the court about the three documents filed by his client.

    Lawyer to Melaye Nkem Okoro confirmed that he has been served with the documents.

    Okoro said the documents were served on him on Tuesday and that he was entitled to seven days under the court’s rules to respond to the three motions.

  • Melaye: Stop INEC, Kogi APC tells court

    Melaye: Stop INEC, Kogi APC tells court

    •Fictitious names in petition, says party

    The Kogi State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) yesterday served the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) the notice of a lawsuit against the agency on Senator Dino Melaye’s recall process.

    In an originating summon brought pursuant to Sections 65(2)(b), 68 and 69 of the Constitution, and Order 3, Rule 9, Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rules, 2009, the Kogi APC and 12 principal officers accused INEC of commencing a Melaye recall process based on a fictitious petition, which contained names of dead persons.

    Joined as Plaintiffs with the APC are: Alhaji Haddy Ametuo, Hon. Shaibu Osune. S.T. Adejo, Yahaya Ismaila, Isah Daniel, Chief Gbenga Ashagun, Ahovi Ibrahim, Ghali Usman, Isa Abubakar, I. Molemodile, Abubakar Adamu and Daniel Sekpe.

    The plaintiffs as the chairman and other principal officers of the APC in Kogi, filed the suit for themselves and on behalf of the party’s working committee.

    Raising seven issues for determination, they prayed the court to within 30 days, make an order of injunction restraining INEC, either by itself or through its servants, employees, agents and privies from commencing or continuing or completing the process of recall of the party’s sponsored member representing Kogi West.

    They want the court to rule that the petition submitted to  INEC Chairman for the recall of Melaye was illegal, unlawful, wrongful, unconstitutional, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.

    They are seeking a declaration that the recall process initiated vide a purported petition against the party’s sponsored member of the Senate by some of his constituents pursuant to Section 69 of the Constitution was illegal, unlawful, wrongful, unconstitutional, null, void and of no effect whatsoever for being contrary and in contravention of the rules of natural justice and the constitutionally guaranteed right to fair hearing under Section 36 of the Constitution.

    The plaintiffs also want a declaration that the purported petition submitted to INEC was incompetent, invalid, null, void and of no effect whatsoever, having been purportedly written by persons who are either dead, fictitious, non-existent or those from outside Kogi West Senatorial District or constituency.

    They also urged the court to restrain INEC from conducting any referendum based on the petition presented and signed by “dead, fictitious and purported constituents of Kogi West”.

    In an affidavit to support the motion Ametuo said Melaye was a good representative of Kogi West Senatorial District and APC, adding that he had discharged his legislative and oversight duties diligently.

    According to him, Melaye’s recall was initiated and occasioned by malice, bad faith and witch hunt, adding that those who purportedly signed the petition were either dead, non-existent or persons not registered members of Kogi West.

    Ametuo added that one Abubakar Abdullahi, who died on January 14, 2013, and Lami Musa who passed on October 31, 2014, were purported signatories to the alleged petition for Melaye’s recall.

     

     

  • INEC to suspend Melaye’s recall

    INEC to suspend Melaye’s recall

     The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) said on Thursday it would suspend the process of recalling the Senator Dino Melaye from the Senate, in compliance with a court order.

    The Commission took the decision at its weekly meeting held in Abuja.

    The Chairman of Information and Voter Education Committee in INEC, Prince Adedeji Soyebi, who disclosed this in a statement, said the Commission would halt the recall process as directed by court.

    He said INEC would also draw the attention of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, to the order stopping it from ahead with the process.

    The meeting, according to Soyebi, also approved a policy of comprehensive audit after all elections.

    “This is in line with its desire to ensure transparency and overall improvement in the electoral process,” he added.

    INEC had earlier notified Melaye about the receipt of petition seeking his recall from the upper legislative chamber, a development which prompted the senator to approach the court for injunction restraining the Commission from going ahead with the process.

    But the Commission went ahead with the process by announcing a timetable for Melaye’s recall from the Senate.

    A Federal High Court, Abuja, on July 6 ordered INEC and Melaye to maintain the “status quo” until a ruling is passed on the lawmaker’s suit.

    The statement reads: ” The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) held its regular weekly meeting today and considered the order given by the Federal High Court, Abuja, dated 6th July 2017 directing the “parties to maintain the status quo till the determination of the plaintiff’s motion on notice,” in respect of the suit filed by Senator Dino Melaye, seeking orders of injunction against the Commission, to stop it from acting on the petition by the registered voters of Kogi West Senatorial district.

    “As a responsible, law-abiding institution, INEC will comply with the order. However, the Commission has also decided to take immediate steps to vacate the court order and for the matter to be heard and determined expeditiously. Whereas, the court adjourned hearing of the Motion on Notice to 29th September 2017, it should be noted that Section 69 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) sets a limit of 90 days from the date of the presentation of the petition (21st June, 2017) for the exercise to be completed.

    “The Commission further decided to draw the attention of the Chief Justice of Nigeria to the order in view of its effect on the performance of the Commission’s constitutional duty to conduct the referendum for the recall in Kogi West Senatorial district.”

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Melaye’s recall as triumph of mediocrity

    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act” – George Orwell.

    Having taken a detailed insight into the ongoing recall exercise against Senator Dino Melaye, representing Kogi West Senatorial District, where this writer hails from, and the fact of me being a bonafide Kabba son with passionate sympathy for the plight of the common man and the downtrodden, I particularly find it very important for me to set the record straight, not only for our generation but the generations yet unborn.

    Although I am not a fan of Sen. Melaye’s embarrassing, oppressive and garrulous lifestyle, but he earns my respect for being elected to represent the good people of my constituency, having won the popular vote in the 2015 elections. I therefore give my maximum respect to the people’s choice. He was voted by the masses to represent the Senatorial District.

    However, the leaked video showing where the Chief of Staff to Kogi State Governor, Yahyah Bello, boasting that Sen. Melaye would not last in the Senate later than June 30, makes it apparent and easy to conclude that the action of the Chief of Staff could be likened to the biblical parable, which describes this agenda as voice of Jacob and the hand of Esau.

    With the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) releasing the timetable to commence the recall exercise, one can easily conclude that the conspiracy and political coup is an attempt by mediocrity to triumph over meritocracy.

    It is an incontrovertible fact that most of Bello’s appointees are sycophantic agents, trying to be more catholic than the Pope. Their knowledge of history and good governance is dull, and they lack the political will to drive Kogi State to the promised land because a good leader should have virtues of forgiveness, tolerance and must be able to unite his people, rather than dividing them.

    The question that an average Okun indigene should be asking is: on what basis is the recall exercise against Dino Melaye?

    Melaye’s achievements as the senator with the highest motion on the floor of the Senate and the senator of the Year should be put in mind. Whether these motions affected the people of Kogi West positively or otherwise is a debate for another day.

    Any of his motions has not been countered as meaningless. His allegations of corruption levelled against Sen. Smart Adeyemi and Gov. Bello have not been countered legally or morally. Has Sen. Melaye’s demand for the welfare of the masses and the workers of Kogi been met by Gov. Bello? I refer to the 15 months unpaid salaries of the workers and pensioners.

    What are the states of our tertiary institutions after months of closure? When is the state having its local government elections? These and many more are the fundamental issues that are begging for answers.

    If the rumour going round in town – from the university common rooms to the beer parlours and pepper soup joints – that the suspended Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) Babachar Lawal is part of the plot to recall Dino Melaye is anything to go by, then the stakeholders must rise to save Sen. Melaye using the referendum as a viable panacea to the imminent anarchy.

    As for Governor Bello, it is imperative to draw his attention to the fact that there is a brutal danger ahead of this exercise, because the question of who will replace Melaye in the Senate would create more political crisis for him and his retinue of political almajiris as the political momentum reaches a point of crescendo.

    Let the governor be informed that beneath his happiness for the recall, there is a clear danger and tension which the exercise would generate, with potential possibility of taking the state further in its journey to become a failed state.

    The most painful thing is that, while both men (Melaye and Bello) are engaged in the battle for relevance ahead of the next elections, the people they are elected to serve are suffering from underdevelopment, high rate of unemployment and insecurity. Yet both abandoned issues to address tissues. What a tragedy!

    I urge INEC chairman and Inspector General of Police to ensure adequate security to protect lives and properties during and after the recall exercise.

    May God bless Kogi State and the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

     

    Sheyi Babaeko is a doctoral student of Policy Analysis and Counter–terrorism Strategist, University of Leeds, UK

  • Melaye: Lawyers serve INEC with restraining order

    Melaye: Lawyers serve INEC with restraining order

    Lawyers representing Senator Dino Melaye on Monday said they have served the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) with an order restraining it from continuing with the senator’s recall from the Senate.

    Melaye’s lead counsel, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), told our correspondent that INEC was served with the order on Monday morning.

    “The clear order was duly served on INEC this (Monday) morning. “INEC, has therefore, been restrained by Justice John Tsoho from taking any steps on the matter of Senator Melaye’s recall till the hearing and determination of his motion on notice for interlocutory injunction against INEC.

    “The application, along with another for joinder by some persons, was fixed for September 29, 2017,” he said. Justice Tsoho made the order on July 6.

    “He granted an interim injunction restraining INEC or its agents from acting on a petition allegedly submitted by Melaye’s constituents, pending the hearing and determination of his motion on notice for an interlocutory injunction.

    “The judge also barred INEC from commencing or further continuing with the process of recalling Melaye or acting on the petition pending hearing and determination of his motion on notice.

    “Justice Tsoho further restrained INEC from conducting any referendum based on the petition until Melaye’s motion on notice f an r interlocutory injunction is heard and determined.

    “The suit is adjourned to the 29th of September, 2017 for hearing of the plaintiff’s motion on notice and the application for joinder,” Justice Tsoho added.

  • Melaye’s recall: There is no restraining order – INEC

    Melaye’s recall: There is no restraining order – INEC

    •Senator’s supporters seek divine intervention

    Barring a last-minute change of mind, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) will begin today the recall of Senator Dino Melaye (Kogi West).

    But supporters of the embattled senator have been pleading with some Christian clerics to intervene in the matter.

    A team headed by INEC National Commissioner might oversee the process, which may also involve its Operation Department.

    A top INEC official, who spoke in confidence, said: “There is no restraining order from any court. We will go ahead with the first leg. But if along the line, INEC is stopped from going ahead with the exercise, we will stop it.

    “Pasting the verification notice is just the first leg of the process, which cannot hurt Melaye in any way.

    “Even the process does not amount to removing the senator. By virtue of Section 110, a lawmaker is only opportune to gauge the mood of his or her constituents on his or her performance.

    “If a lawmaker is doing well, he or she should feel free to face the electorate. The process is not a setback at all for any lawmaker.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “A team to be coordinated by the National Commissioner for Northcentral will oversee the process. Definitely, the Operation Department will be involved.

    “INEC will,  however, seek legal opinion immediately it is served the ruling of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    “We have subsisting court judgments, including those of the Court of Appeal,  indicating that no court can stop a recall, which is like an election.”

    Melaye’s counsel Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) flew into Abuja yesterday.

    Some supporters of the embattled senator have been begging some Christian clerics to assist by whipping up religious sentiments, another source said.

    The INEC timetable shows that  Melaye’s recall will run from July 10th to August 19th.

    The notice, dated July 3, 2017, reads: “In exercise of the powers conferred on the Independent National Electoral Commission (“the Commission”) by Sections 69 and 110 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended); Section 116 of the Electoral  Act 2010 (as amended) and of all the powers enabling it in that behalf, the Commission hereby issues this timetable schedule of activities for the recall of the Senator representing Kogi West Senatorial District, Kogi State.”

    The details of the timetable are as follows:

    • Notice of Verification(July 10, 2017). To be posted at the constituency (INEC LGA office, Lokoja).
    • Last day for submission of application by interested observers (31st July 2017). INEC headquarters.
    • Last day for submission of names of verification agents for the member sought to be recalled and the petitioners (August 10, 2017). By a letter addressed and submitted to the Resident Electoral Commission (REC) indicating the Polling Unit verification agents arranged by LGAs as well as collation agents and where they will serve.
    • Stakeholders meeting (August 15, 2017). INEC State Office.
    • Conduct of Verification (August 19, 2017). To be held in the Polling Units in the constituency.

    “The commission shall issue the timetable and schedule of  activities for the conduct of referendum subject to the outcome of the verification exercise.”

  • Court refuses to stop INEC on Melaye’s recall

    Court refuses to stop INEC on Melaye’s recall

    Embattled Senator Dino Melaye failed on Thursday in his bid to stop the ongoing recall process by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Justice John Tsoho in an ex-parte ruling rejected Melaye’s motion for a temporary injunction restraining INEC from proceeding with the recall process until the determination of suit challenging his recall.

    Instead, the judge ordered parties in the case to “maintain status quo pending the hearing of the motion on notice.”

    Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) argued Melaye’s ex-parte motion.

    The judge adjourned till September 29 hearing of Melaye’s motion on notice and applications filed by three individuals, led by Chief Cornelius Olowo, who applied to be made parties in the suit.

    In the main suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/587/2017, with INEC as the only defendant, Melaye faulted the recall process, saying it was tainted with political malice and initiated by his political enemies.

    The Senator denied any wrongdoing and claimed he was being targeted for standing up for the oppressed in Kagi State and the many workers who have not been paid salaries by the state government.

    Melaye is praying the court to declare the petition submitted to INEC Chairman, Prof. Yakubu Mahmood, as “illegal, unlawful, wrongful, unconstitutional, invalid, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.”

    He also wants the court to void the recall process because it was commenced in breach of his fundamental right to fair hearing.

     

  • Melaye asks court to stop release of council funds to Kogi

    Melaye asks court to stop release of council funds to Kogi

    •Senator: I want to be a councillor

    The crisis of confidence between Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello and Senator Dino Melaye has taken a new dimension following a fresh suit by Melaye asking for a court order to stop the release of statutory allocations to the state’s 21 local governments.

    Melaye is praying the Federal High Court, Lokoja to restrain the Minister of Finance, the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) from remitting the funds meant for the local governments until election is conducted into the councils.

    He said he is interested in being a councillor in Ijumu Local Government Area and the refusal of the state government to conduct election into the councils was affecting his ambition.

    He added that the absence of democratically-elected officers at the local government level has made the state government spend and dissipate the funds meant for the 21 councils.

    He said it was illegal for the governor to appoint administrators, trustees or sole administrators for the local governments in the state.

    The suit was filed at the Federal High Court, Lokoja.

    In an affidavit, which he personally sworn to, Melaye averred as follows:

    “That I was informed by my lawyer, Mr. Ajayi Jaiye Samuel, on the 5th day of May, 2017 at about 8pm while discussing the facts in this suit and my predicament arising from the refusal of the 6th defendant to conduct  Local Government Elections in Kogi State, I verily believe him to be true and correct as follows:

    (i) That it is improper to put in charge the administration of the 8th to 28th defendants, persons including civil servants, who are not democratically elected.

    (ii) That it is not proper for the 6th defendant to have refused to conduct Local Government Elections before and after the expiration of the tenure of the elected Local Government Councils of the 8th to 28th defendants.

    (iii) That there cannot exist validly constituted Joint Local Government Account Allocation Committee of Kogi State without democratically elected chairmen and councillors of the 8th-28th defendants.

    (iv) That is not proper for the 29th (CBN), 30th (the Minister of Finance)  and 31st (the FAAC) defendants to continue to release monies accruing to the 8th -28th defendants from the Federation Account to the 7th defendant without  democratically chairmen  councillors of the 8th-28th defendants.

    The senator said he filed the suit because he intended to be a councillor in Ijumu Local Government Area.

    He said: “As an astute politician, I am interested in contesting for a councillorship position in my Local Government Area, Ijumu and I am also interested in the outcome of the local government elections in all the local government areas of Kogi State, the 8th-28th defendants in this suit.”

  • Gov Bello, Melaye’s recall and Okun dilemma

    Gov Bello, Melaye’s recall and Okun dilemma

    IN his desperate bid to stave off the disaster his recall from the senate would signify for his political career, Dino Melaye (APC-Kogi West) has assembled a posse of public relations mercenaries to sway the shifting loyalties of the public to his side and take the fight to Governor Yahaya Bello, the man masterminding his woes. Mr Bello is fairly anonymous, almost as if he lives and works in a cosmic black hole. He is so ideologically barren and devoid of human feelings that it is a wonder he ever had the presence of mind to even contest for the Kogi State governorship in 2015. He of course did not win, but through a series of convoluted machinations by the All Progressives Congress (APC), the young pretender soon found himself in the State House in Lokoja. At his shambolic inauguration boycotted by the movers and shakers of the APC, he was supported by the rambunctious Senator Melaye, 43, who delivered a stirring but entirely vacuous speech.

    Barely a year later, the two men fell out for a number of reasons, all quite self-serving. With each passing day, the animosity between the two men has grown in amperage to the point that the state is now aflame. From Abuja, Sen Melaye also masterminded a potpourri of measures and inspired a host of statements all designed to undermine Mr Bello and possibly get him impeached. The governor would have been deserving of impeachment, for his incompetence is of such intensity that the state is truly and unquestionably groaning in mess. But from Lokoja, the state capital, in addition to assassination bids of undetermined origin, Mr Bello has himself inspired a more effective political chicanery designed to recall Sen Melaye and put paid to his political career. The ostensible reason for the recall plot is the senator’s embarrassing theatrics, loutish behaviour, and despicable loyalties and interactions. Neither combatant is more likely than the other to win in this deathly struggle.

    From all indications, Mr Bello, despite the loathing Kogites have for him, will serve out his tenure. He will not get a second term, however, regardless of the thuggish youth groups he is assembling and training for future electoral shenanigans. Unseating a serving governor, as everyone knows, is a difficult, if not impossible, enterprise. Former president Olusgeun Obasanjo succeeded in unhorsing a few governors because he went outside the constitution to consummate that political malfeasance. Unseating a senator is also by no means an easy task. There are all sorts of legal and constitutional roadblocks, and of course extralegal obstacles too, some of which Sen Melaye has enacted with practiced ease over many years of thuggish but exhilarating politicking.

    With the two politicians matching each other in their infamy, it is surprising that Kogi State, not to say Kogi West senatorial district where Sen Melaye hails from, should find it befuddling to take sides. Both Sen Melaye and Mr Bello are undesirable; but it is not difficult to settle the precedence between the two. Mr Bello’s damaging impact on the state is impossible to quantify. He is destroying everything in his path. And, to boot, he is destroying everyone close or far from him. Everything he touches turns to dust in the state. On the other hand, despite his comical politics and infuriating attachments and statements, Sen Melaye’s influence is not as destructive in its impact on the state as Mr Bello’s. What is even more worrisome is the close inverse relationship between the victory of one and the defeat of the other. Should Sen Melaye win, and it is hard to see him unseating Mr Bello despite the unalloyed support from the state chapter of the APC, the consequences for the state would be manageable. But should Mr Bello win, it is not only Sen Melaye who will probably and deservingly go to jail, the state itself would be shackled, castrated and humiliated beyond human endurance.

    Given this zero-sum game, it is hard to understand why Kogi political and business elites have been both timid and undiscerning in determining whom to back. Sensing their customary diffidence, not to say their constant ideological and philosophical pusillanimity, Sen Melaye tried last week to force the hands of the fence sitters from Kogi West, particularly the elite from the Okun speaking part of the state. In a badly worded press release, the Okun Development Initiative (ODI), doubtless working for the senator, sensibly suggested that it was more desirable to support Sen Melaye than back Mr Bello. Proudly affirming Okunland’s ideological and political independence, the ODI told the world that while they would not dispute the weaknesses of Sen Melaye, the region was quite capable of independently unseating its representatives whenever they desired. It was apparent the ODI knew instinctively that Mr Bello’s victory in the titanic clash with the uppity senator would spell far worse doom and tragedy for the state. Their logic is unimpeachable. Mr Bello is a far more pressing danger to the state than Sen Melaye.

    The relatively unknown ODI, however, attributed their statement to some of Okunland’s well-known leaders, including Prof Eyitayo Lambo, a former Health minister, Bayo Ojo (SAN), a former Justice minister and attorney general of the federation, Julius Oshanupin, a retired general, and Tunde Ipinmisho, a former editor. It turned out that the four neither signed the statement nor knew anything about it. They were therefore right to refute the statement; but it is not clear why they did not go further to give their perspectives on the battle between the two undesirables. Other than declaring their reluctance to be drawn into the ‘mess in Kogi’, they seemed to be indifferent to the need to come down from the fence and help Okunland — and by extension Kogi West — to make up its mind on the delicate issue of offering a nuanced support to one of the combatants.

    Before the combat developed into a stalemate, Kogi elites from all the senatorial districts ought to have courageously made their voices heard. Instead, they pulled their punches, and appeared to surrender to the likes of Sen Melaye the leadership of fighting Mr Bello. The senator may lack the integrity to engage and even lead the noble fight, but the objective of calling Mr Bello to account is indeed a just one. Kogi should be able to make that distinction. More, they should be able to recognise that while Sen Melaye’s national buffooneries should be execrated, it can at least be tolerated. What is indeed intolerable is Mr Bello’s incompetence which has led to wholesale despoliation of the state, the destruction and indirect killing of unpaid workers, and the general retrogression of the state at a time when many other states are making great strides.

    The Okun Development Initiative doubtless works for Sen Melaye, and may be as disreputable as the senator himself. But the group has drawn attention to the need for everyone in Kogi State, and in particular Okunland, to make a choice, even if it is Hobson’s choice. Neutrality is deprecated. By failing to side with one camp does not mean the two combatants will mutually self-destruct. They will not. Instead, one side will win; but it may be the wrong side. It is not too late for Okunland and Kogi in general to take sides. Okuland may have been guilty of many things in the past, including their indefensible timidity borne out of many years of exasperating caution and poor judgement, they must never let it be said of this generation that they allowed, by unintelligent default, the likes of Mr Bello to determine for them their choice of representatives. ODI made this point well.

    Okunland, as much as the national APC, was complicit in the controversial enthronement of Sen Melaye. Worse, by keeping quite in the face of his national tomfooleries, when they should have on their own agitated for Kogi West to recall him or put pressure on him to tone down his idiotic politics, they indirectly gave room for Mr Bello to captain a cause that resonates with Nigerians who neither know the circumstances and intricacies of Kogi politics nor have an understanding of the consequences of allowing Mr Bello succeed in the plot to recall the noisome senator. The choice is simple and the priority clear: ensure that for now Mr Bello loses the recall gambit, and then  later ensure that both the governor and senator never smell the corridors of power ever again. Both men are unqualified to represent themselves, not to talk of either Kogi West or the state as a whole.