Tag: meltdown

  • Lagos and the O to ge meltdown

    They may as well be aptly christened the “O to ge” elections. I refer to the February 23rd and March 9th, 2019, national and state executive as well as legislative polls, which are being concluded today with supplementary elections in five states. Of course, O to ge has now become part and parcel of the ever fascinating and evolving grammar of Nigerian politics. It is the quaint Yoruba expression for ‘enough is enough’, reflective of the idiomatic phraseology of the Yoruba of Kwara state extraction, in North-Central Nigeria. From east to west and north to south, the new no-nonsense O to ge mood of the Nigerian electorate has seen bloated egos deflated mercilessly and one Lilliputian political David after the other not only felling but ruthlessly decapitating overrated electoral behemoths with pleasurable relish.

    Not surprisingly, Kwara, which gifted the nation the succinct and surgical O to ge sobriquet, has also been the most visible and prominent theatre for the manifestation of this near revolutionary phenomenon in contemporary Nigerian politics. The Saraki dynasty had for close to five decades been the dominant dynamo in the politics of Kwara. In the wake of the O to ge revolutionary gale, the imperious political tactician, who takes no prisoners, Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, not only lost his re-election bid to the Senate, his Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) stranglehold on the politics of the state was decisively broken.

    Ironically, the prime victim of the O to ge blitzkrieg in Kwara, Dr. Bukola Saraki, must also be credited for, even if subconsciously, sowing the seeds that have become a veritable new Iroko in the forest of Kwara politics. Ever since this writer attained enough political consciousness to serve as a teen age polling agent of Chief Obafemi Awolowo’s Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) in the heart land of Ilorin, (Pakata), in 1979, the late Dr. Olusola Saraki, the one and only Oloye, had maintained an unbroken suzerainty over the politics of Kwara state.

    A most colourful, assured and masterly majority leader of the Senate on the platform of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) in the Second Republic, the Saraki patriarch bestrode the politics of Kwara like a colossus. He had a hand in the emergence, and sometimes untidy exit from office, of practically every elected governor in Kwara for over three and a half decades. These include Prince Adamu Attah, Chief Cornelius Adebayo, Mr. Mohammed Shaaba Lafiagi, and Col. Mohammed Lawal (rtd). Oloye’s crowning glory was the election of his ruthlessly ambition son, Bukola, as governor of Kwara between 2003 and 2011. But in that triumph were embedded the seeds of Oloye’s political demystification, a development that reportedly left him heartbroken till the end of his days.

    Apparently convinced of the political impermeability of the political dynasty he had come to personify in Kwara, Oloye most inexplicably wanted his daughter, Gbemi Saraki, to succeed her brother as governor of the state. But Bukola, through wily tactical manouvres said no – O to ge. The younger Saraki ensured that he installed in office after him a successor of his own choosing, Mr. Abdulfattah Ahmed, the outgoing governor.

    In defying and defenestrating his father, Bukola sowed the wind. If the great Oloye could be so easily dislodged and caged, many Kwarans wondered, then the seemingly invincible dynasty must have feet of clay after all. Bukola reaped the whirl wind on February 23rd and March 9th. The O to ge message in Kwara soared on the wings of the inexcusable underperformance and underdevelopment of an otherwise richly endowed state in terms of human and natural resources punching embarrassingly below her weight. The rest is history. Fast forward then, to Lagos.

    On Thursday, February 28th, 2019, a group, the Free Lagos Orange Movement surfaced in Lagos ostensibly to replicate the Kwara O to ge revolution in the Centre of Excellence. Claiming that the group had no permit to organize a protest rally, the police prevented the Free Lagos Orange Movement from staging its demonstration at the Lagos Airport Hotel. However, one of the conveners of the group, a former President of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Mr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), enunciated its aim to the press.

    In his words, “The Free Lagos Orange Movement is a non-political movement that is aimed at ensuring that we have good governance in Lagos State. We feel that Tinubu has had his time as the emperor of Lagos since 1998, and we are trying to mobilize Lagosians to say no to continuity of Lagos by Tinubu”. This is indeed most astonishing. So Lagos has had one emperor presiding over its affairs since 1999 and not governors democratically elected in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015 and now 2019?

    Of course, the point that Agbakoba and the Free Lagos Orange Movement are trying to make is obvious. They seek to establish an equivalency between the Saraki and Tinubu political dominance in Kwara and Lagos, respectively, since 1999. Political influence and electoral dominance are not alien to democracy. However, every dominant political tendency will ultimately stand or fall on the basis of the verdict of the electorate on its impact on their lives, positive or native, as determined in free, fair and credible elections.

    It is thus instructive that the APC in Lagos won the March 9, 2019, governorship election by a more emphatic margin than it did in 2015 – a landslide. It was a grievous error of judgement for the Free Lagos Orange Movement to have extrapolated so carelessly from the politics of Kwara to Lagos without a more rigorous analysis. In the first place, the kind of feudal-oriented and essentially backward dynastic politics foisted on Kwara by the Sarakis over the last four decades is impossible to replicate in any South-West State least of all a cosmopolitan megalopolis like Lagos.

    Any dominant political tendency in Lagos can only sustain its relevance and enjoy continued popular support if it is perceived as utilizing its mandate to pursue the greatest good of the greatest number of the people.

    For 16 years between 1999 and 2015, Nigeria not only stagnated but even retrogressed badly on virtually all fronts – infrastructure, security, social welfare, poverty indices etc under the PDP. That fortunately has not been the fate of Lagos. With Asiwaju Bola Tinubu laying a solid foundation for the revitalization of the state and Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN) as well as Akinwunmi Ambode building admirably on this inheritance, Lagos has witnessed a steadily incremental improvement in revenue capacity, modernization and expansion of infrastructure, enhancement in the quality and affordability of social services as well as better security among others.

    Equally instructive is the fact that not even the obstacles placed on the path of Lagos by a largely adversarial PDP-controlled centre between 1999 and 2015 have been able to impede the state’s progress.

    It is all too easy to assume that all this occurred through happenstance or sheer magic. In reality, it is a function of careful planning, policy focus and consistency as well as continuity in visionary governance since 1999. This in turn has been made possible partly because in June 1999, the Tinubu administration transformed the previously existing Plans, Programmes and Budget Bureau (PPBB) into a full- fledged Lagos State Ministry of Economic Planning and Budget (MEPB) as the organizational fulcrum for the long term development planning of the state. It is under the aegis of the Ministry that a Master plan has been produced and systematically implemented and fine-tuned by successive administrations with the period 1999 – 2024 as its first phase.

    Furthermore, Tinubu’s extraordinary ability to identify and develop talents as well as give them wings to fly on their own steam and become impactful leaders in their own right has been a key defining feature of governance in Lagos since 1999. This is of course contrary to the feudal ethos that has characterized governance in Kwara since 1999. Over the last 20 years, governance in Kwara has been plagued by policy adhocism, paucity of vision and an ascriptive rather than merit-driven mode of public appointments and elite recruitment with negative consequences for progress and development.

    Could Kwara have charted an alternative development course with more positive developmental outcomes than the pathetic situation in which the state finds itself today? Most certainly. Dr. Saraki has the talent and ability to have charted a transformational path for Kwara during his eight years as governor. The opportunity was unfortunately, in my view, squandered. Those who know him, say that the outgoing Kwara State governor is a man of competence and ability. But what template of governance did he inherit? What legacy of excellence in governance did he have to inspire him to rise above the mediocre? Was he bequeathed a governance ecology that would have enabled merit to thrive? Those are some of the questions that the Free Lagos Orange Movement should have carefully interrogated before jumping into the partisan fray in Lagos.

    Has Lagos then arrived at her Eldorado? Most certainly not. No polity ever does. Lagos is a work in progress. The mega city continues to experience her share of environmental, bureaucratic, ethical and several other challenges. However, Lagos remains the most successful state model of developmental democracy, economic emancipation and social progress in Nigeria over the last 20 years. That is why the O to ge movement that shook Kwara to its foundations suffered an anticlimactic meltdown in Lagos on March 9th.

    It is certainly not for nothing that Lagos remains the prime destination of choice for millions of Nigerians and even beyond who throng the state daily in search of success and prosperity. Perhaps the O to ge revolution will propel Kwara to discover and begin to actualize her immense potentials as a state.

  • Medical meltdown

    •Nigerian healthcare is seriously ill

    The fact that Nigeria’s health system is in dire straits has been reinforced by the recent publication of a damning report issued by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP).

    Titled “Failing Healthcare: How Federal Hospitals are Letting Down the Poor and Making Healthcare a Privilege Rather than a Right,” the 53-page report is a comprehensive indictment of three federally-owned medical institutions located in Lagos, namely, the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Igbobi (NOHIL) and the Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Ebute-Metta.

    It is a sorry tale of non-functioning and obsolete equipment, critical shortages of medical consumables and supplies, overcrowded wards and waiting rooms, and widespread disillusionment in heavily-overworked staff. Work is hampered by intermittent power and water supply, insufficient personnel, and a lack of administrative and political commitment to improving the situation in the short and long-term.

    As if this was not bad enough, the medical challenges in Lagos State were aggravated when medical and dental consultants at the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) went on strike.

    The four medical facilities are the largest and supposedly best-equipped in Nigeria’s richest and most populous state. If they have to struggle with problems as deep-rooted as these, what other hospitals elsewhere in the country will be going through does not bear thinking about. Although FMC, Ebute-Metta, has described the SERAP report as unbalanced, the point remains that the hospital is not as good as it was many years ago.

    What makes the situation particularly distressing is that these public hospitals are the first line of defence in the war against disease in Nigeria, and this irrefutable evidence of their inability to carry out their functions effectively has grave implications for the quality of life in the country.

    According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Nigeria had a life expectancy at birth of 55 years for males and 56 years for females as at 2016. It has one of the highest child and maternal mortality rates in the world. Plagued by inefficient social infrastructure, the country regularly battles outbreaks of malaria, cholera and other eminently preventable diseases. In effect, its hospitals have a lot of work to do if Nigeria is to become a healthier place.

    The Federal Government must take the lead in turning the country’s lamentable health situation around. In this respect, it is tragic that nothing appears to have been learnt from the disgraceful revelations surrounding the Aso Rock Clinic in 2016 and 2017. It was found that the clinic lacked basic drugs and a functional x-ray machine in spite of a budget provision in excess of N3 billion annually for drugs.

    This scandal should have provided the opportunity for the Federal Ministry of Health to ensure that inefficiencies in the nation’s drug-procurement policy were fully addressed, along with issues bedevilling the supply and maintenance of medical equipment and facilities. However, it seems that nothing substantive was done to redeem the situation.

    It cannot continue. The penchant for politically-exposed persons to seek medical attention outside Nigeria has focused public attention on the country’s healthcare to a greater degree than before. Non-governmental organisations like SERAP are stepping up pressure on governments to live up to their obligations to the citizenry.

    More funds must be pumped into the health sector, and spent properly. Instead of wasting money on building new hospitals that are essentially white elephants which quickly fall into disuse, state and federal governments must focus on rehabilitating and expanding already-existing facilities like LUTH, NOHIL and the FMCs scattered across the country. In spite of the increasing importance of private hospitals, they still offer the critical combination of size, skill, service and cost that is unmatched anywhere else.

    The procurement of equipment, drugs and other consumables must be streamlined in such a way that costs are lowered. Instead of isolated acquisitions by hospitals, for example, it should be possible to enter into bulk-purchase agreements with drug-makers and equipment suppliers for all the federal or state-owned hospitals in a state or geopolitical zone. This would have the effect of reducing costs, effectively tracking supplies and substantially eliminating corruption.

    SERAP has done well to expose issues that no one was prepared to discuss. It is now up to state and federal governments to see that they are dealt with decisively.

  • Invasion of Asians is creating meltdown in drilling business

    Invasion of Asians is creating meltdown in drilling business

    Ajani Babatunde Ajikobi, the CEO of Real Drill Hydrokonsult, knew what he wanted to do at a very young age, little wonder he has made a fortune in a profession he is in love with. This Geology graduate shares his success story with GBENGA ADERANTI

    HOW did you conceive the idea of Real Drill Hydrokonsult?

    The idea of Real Drill was conceived due to the fact that majority of the prospective clients for borehole drilling do have little or no confidence in their would-be service providers for water project because of several people that have fallen victim of shoddy execution or even some that would have paid borehole drillers, but getting nothing in return. They classify borehole itself as a black market business and this always makes it difficult to win hearts of several clients. You need to speak extensively to convince some clients most often. Having known this, I had to think deeply and developed the idea of naming my drilling firm Real Drill. You know anything real must be original .  We represent this very name of ours religiously. We always deliver successfully even in several terrains where many drillers had failed. Another thing that makes Real Drill real in the drilling industry is the array of our seasoned professionals in different subdivisions of geology, especially on hydrogeology.

    Of all the businesses, why water science?

    Water is life. Therefore, he who gives water gives life. This really informed us to go into this business.  It is imperative  to have water in our homes since municipal water supply has become nothing to write home about, hence borehole becomes the only option. The sustainability of water for life and its profitability as business ventures remain reasons for specializing in water science

    There are many people doing the same business you are doing, how have you been able to survive the competition?

    Our sophisticated equipment, seasoned professionals and sheer honesty make us to stand tall among other drillers around.

    The headquarters of your organisation is in Osun; does that mean your scope is restricted to the South West?

    We are not a local company at all. We work in any part of the country once the terms and conditions are mutually met, the clients and our company. Our equipment is trunk mounted. We can travel to any part of the country, either for basement or sedimentary drilling. Currently, we are at Shiroro, Niger State for geophysical survey to site a prolific borehole point and which shall be onward mobilisation for drilling as soon as possible.

    What are the challenges you are facing in this business?

    There is no lucrative business without challenges, but here in Nigeria, a lot of man-made factors heighten the challenges unnecessarily. The commonest challenge in any business is funds. In this wise, the limitation of cash flow acts as a serious barrier to incorporate a lot of development into our business. To exemplify this, recently in the past, I had the intention of importing tools and materials from manufacturers abroad, but the plan became aborted because of the unfriendly exchange rate. One needs a lot of several millions to achieve this, but the pertinent question is how such money could be raised.

    Capital is a vital factor and it is one of challenges we are facing. Government policy is also a factor . The situation in which an entrepreneur is  heavily taxed by the government, but gets nothing in return from the government is not good. Also, it takes a very good grace of God to get contracts from the government on merit in this country, and if at all one is fortunate to get one, to get paid is another issue.

    Invasion of Asian drillers from India is also creating unnecessary meltdown in the drilling industry.

    Another serious challenge we have in this business is the poor quality of most materials that are produced in Nigeria. Our local manufacturers keep reducing both the quality and quantity of their products. Another challenge is quackery. I do not know any other profession that harbours quacks more than the drilling job. The irony of it is that the population of quacks is greater than that of the professionals

    How much did you start with?

    Drilling business is capital intensive. It requires several millions to acquire rig and compressor which are the major machines needed to operate the business. I may not be able to mention here the exact amount I used to start my drilling firm, but for the benefit of the public to know the idea of what it takes to float an organized drilling firm with good equipment, especially nowadays, conservatively, it will cost nothing less than N30m to commence a medium-scale drilling firm.

    How much is the business worth right now?

    We thank God and our numerous clients. We can not be mentioning names here because they are numerous. We have appreciably multiplied through the help of Almighty God and we thank Him for the trust or confidence that our clients have in us as their service provider. We have equipment that can successfully deliver 60 boreholes in four weeks. We have also increased tremendously in staff strength. We are now many from just six personnel in the beginning.

    Would you have been more fulfilled in other businesses?

    Sincerely, I wouldn’t have been more fulfilled in any other profession than my present status. What really excites me here is the number of people that we have impacted positively in this water world. I always feel on top of the world about this and appreciate my creator who gives me the capacity to develop humans to be self-reliant economically. Real Drill has trained many people from various higher institutions across the country. Currently, we have four attaches from higher institutions. Most of the company’s geologists gainfully employed are the products of our industrial training. Drilling is my calling. I have a passion for it and I beg my God to let it be my calling forever. If there is second coming to this world, I pray to God to let it be my calling. I enjoy it a lot.

    What does it take to do business in Nigeria?

    It takes a lot of grace from God to be a successful man in this country. Hindrances are many. Can you imagine the producing companies that have closed down all because of power supply alone? You too know what recession has caused. A lot of businesses have been crippled. You need to be rugged, disciplined, frugal, prayerful and proactive to be a successful businessman in Nigeria.

    What do you think government should do about quacks who have found themselves in the business?

    Government through our lawmakers should come up with a law or laws that will discourage the quacks from this business. This should not be limited to law, but to actively see to the enforcement of the said law for optimal effectiveness. This will even boast the revenue generation as the offenders should not go scot free without being fined.

    What efforts are you making to ensure that the business outlive you?

    Firstly, Real Drill officially launched a corporate social responsibility initiative in November, 2015  by voluntarily donating a functional borehole to a community in Otan Ayegbaju, Osun State. Real Drill has executed seven boreholes for communities in Osun and Oyo states at no cost. By God’s grace, we are not relenting to give back to the society where we have gained enormously. Also, we shall commission a corporate office which would be first of its kind in Osun State. This is to buttress our uniqueness and affirm our being real in drilling business.

  • ‘How families can survive meltdown’

    ‘How families can survive meltdown’

    Leading Christian marriage counsellor, Pastor Bisi Adewale, spoke with Sunday Oguntola on the challenges facing families based on the economic meltdown and how they can navigate the storms

    How is the economic crunch affecting families?

    This is not the best of times for families at all. Many parents cannot meet obligations like school fees. Many wives are leaving their matrimonial homes. I know a particular pastor whose wife just left with their five children.

    According to her, the man cannot meet her needs. A sister also left her husband of less than one year, insisting he is not manly enough.

    This crunch is really hitting families. It is making women not to respect their husbands like before. It is giving more rooms for infidelity. Some women who are unstable are falling into the hands of those with the means. So, it is a hard time really and families are pressed hard.

    What else have you observed in your counseling sessions?

    We have observed that many couples fight more these days. You know financial pressure is a huge challenge that only a few women can cope with. Many men are becoming more violent and irritable because they cannot meet needs.

    A woman told me that anytime she opens milk, her husband is always saying, ‘don’t take too much’; ‘why are you eating three meals’. It is becoming a serious issue for many families. Expenses are increasing while incomes are shrinking. Someone told me he has just taken a 40 percent pay cut. He is likely to vent his anger on the wife if care is not taken.

    This economic downturn is putting pressure on families. We have more counseling sessions on money issues and we often end up in stalemates because most wives refuse to budge. A lot of men are becoming insecure and violent. Wife battery is increasing though we cannot exonerate the culprits. So, it is a whole lot of chain reactions that we are witnessing.

    So, what should families be doing at a time like this?

    I need to say that we have been wasteful as a nation with families. Government has its blames but an individual family overspends than its incomes. Last week, I was in a town and I saw parties everywhere. All private and public school premises were hired. Everywhere was jam packed with people.

    I saw billboards announcing burial activities of their parents. I don’t know how we got there. Instead of husband and wife to fight, they need to sit down and reconsider their budgeting plans. We buy more on impulse in Africa and this must stop. Families need to learn the four Ms of Money….

    … Which are?

    The first M is making money. People need to learn how to make more money. There is something called moonlight income. Most people close by 4 or 5pm and gossip away till nightfall. This is the time to consider what else to do to make money after close of work.

    People must think of what else to do. Cuba has not been able to import since 1968 and so they looked inwards. You see them still driving old model vehicles. A lot of them learnt how to repair their vehicles. This is the time to cut costs and increase incomes for families. Instead of lambasting government on social media, we need to think of how to make money.

    The second M is maturity. We lack financial maturity in this part of the world. We buy shoes for N75, 000 and pay for nine months. Yet, the salary is just N50, 000. By the time you pay up, the shoe is already worn out. We hold remembrance services that are needless.

    Maybe God created this scenario so that we can learn. We buy to impress and show up. Nobody is impressed by whatever you buy; only your pocket is suppressed. We must read books on money and attend seminar on finances to gain intelligence.

    The third M is managing it. Money management in marriage is needful. One of the greatest keys to managing money is saving. An average worker is broke before the next pay day. We must develop saving culture out of financial intelligence.

    As a Christian, you pay God first, then yourself. You leave a order for a percentage to save, no matter what.  The last M is maximizing money. Money is our blood and sweat. If you waste it, you waste your blood and sweat. There must be projects your saving is committed to. If there is no project, there is no progress.  Families must sit down and get this sorted out.

    What are other practical steps to consider?

    I will say wives must be patient with their husbands while men too should strive harder. Families must cry to God for ideas and intervention. Instead of fighting, let us pray together. Those who sleep around should stop because it is wasteful. If you have a friend working with you in the same neighbourhood, go for car sharing.

    Let someone drives today and another person for the next week. Fuel consumption goes down and costs of maintenance too. We should learn to drop celebrity consciousness. Those who have jeeps should consider smaller vehicles for less cost. Save more and put it on a project such as real estate.

    Every kobo you receive now is supposed to protect you in your old age. We are running money and marriage master class for 30 days. I just wrote Money Management in Marriage and Maximising Money in Marriage to address these issues.

  • Meltdown

    •That appears the lot of general civil society, as divided Organised Labour becomes the prime casualty of the fuel pump price hike

    The jury may still be out on the relative success or failure of the nationwide strike Organised Labour called to protest the hike of the price of petrol from N86.50 to N145.

    But what is beyond dispute is that Organised Labour, now thoroughly disorganised and factionalised, has emerged the prime casualty of the strike. But Labour’s unravelling is only a reflection of much of Nigeria’s  civil society pressure groups — professional and trade bodies, and advocacy groups alike.

    They all appear comatose, when they should be vibrant and alive, to debate and challenge the present order; and help fine-tune public policy. That is not good enough for Nigerian democracy.

    But back to Labour and the controversial strike. Many say Labour was hasty in embarking on a strike, over the fuel matter. True.

    But so was the Federal Government,  that sensationally announced a hefty hike in fuel pricing, a move not a few have dubbed audacious, without much ado, or any worthwhile consultation.

    The government pleaded scary, economy-melting numbers to justify its new policy. It was the only way to keep Nigeria wet, since the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) could only import 50 per cent of the products locally consumed. The new policy would therefore make the market much more open, for whoever can muster the required foreign exchange.

    But Labour riposted by rightly pointing at widespread pains, in an economy already buckling under 13 per cent inflation, mass poverty and scary youth joblessness.

    Both the government and Labour are right from their own perspective. So, both would have benefited from extensive dialogue, before taking any action. The result would have been more beneficial than the ensuing disruption.

    Still, it would appear Labour suffered more from its felt past misdeeds than the justice — or even persuasiveness — of its present campaign. Its nemesis was the  controversial ending of the January 2012 ‘Occupy Nigeria’ anti-fuel price increase campaign, with protesting partners alleging Labour leaders struck illicit deals with the Goodluck Jonathan Presidency, and left them in the lurch.

    The allegations against Labour remain allegations.  But that many seem to believe it, thus rating Labour below the usually distrusted government in credibility, has done Labour’s brand equity no good. So, if the strike is not as total as many would have expected, it is because Labour’s publics have lost so much trust in it. That is not good for any organisation.

    Indeed, compared to its classical days, when it boasted credible leaders like the late Michael Imoudu, the irreplaceable Labour Leader No. 1, and Hassan Sunmonu, hero of the reformed Labour movement under the Obasanjo military government in the late 1970s, Organised Labour, basically comprising the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and Trade Union Congress (TUC) would appear much compromised.

    But then, that appears the lot of other critical pressure groups: Nigerian Medical Association (NMA), Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT), and others, who appear to have lost their voice, at a critical juncture of Nigeria’s democracy. Overall, it is not the best of times for civil society.

    Let Labour and others suffer for their past misdeeds. That would help to chasten Labour and prepare it anew for its sacred duty as a democratic pressure group, that must help keep the government on its toes.

    But let no one demonise Labour to the extent that it becomes utterly irrelevant and discarded. That would be unfortunate for everyone in the long run. However, Organised Labour should use this strike near-fiasco to remake itself and employ fresh and workable strategies to fight its cause, beyond wild strikes.

    But no matter how the strike is perceived, the Buhari Presidency should realise its level of success, no matter how low, points to the harshness of the new fuel pricing regime.

    If should therefore use it as a gauge to eventually soften the pains by staying true to, and aggressively implement, its local refining programme. That is the only logical way to exit this seasonal madness of hiking prices and risking strikes.

  • DMO ‘ll rescue economy from meltdown, say Reps

    DMO ‘ll rescue economy from meltdown, say Reps

    Members of the House of Representatives Committee on Aids, Loans and Debt Management, has said that it is only through the instrumentalities of the Debt Management Office (DMO) that Nigeria can carefully come out of the looming economic crisis.

    The Chairman of the Committee, Honourable Adeyinka Ajayi, who yesterday led members of the committee on a familiarisation visit to the DMO said that the debt office was the engine room of the nation’s economy that was always expected to come up with sustainable debt management models for the overall prosperity of the country.

    “While acknowledging the crucial role the DMO has continued to play in the management of the country’s economy, this visit is significant and historic. The DMO is the engine room of the Nigerian Economy whose initiatives have often prevented the economy from going into recession”, Hon. Ajayi said.

    He noted that with the current stiff challenges facing the country as a result of the sharp decline in revenues from the sale of crude oil, the DMO is once again, expected to play a pivotal role in the effort to steer the economy out of trouble.

    The Director-General of DMO, Dr. Abraham Nwankwo praised the Chairman and members of the Committee for the special favour of coming to be with” them and expressed the DMO’s appreciation of the invaluable support and deep collaboration it has always enjoyed from the Committee.

    He said the D-G taken the DMO through turbulent times in the nation’s recent economic experience.

    Speaking on the theme: ‘Brief on the Mandate and Activities of the Debt Management Office’ Dr. Nwankwo recounted the background to the establishment of the DMO and outlined the milestones achieved by the Office since its inception.

    He reviewed the successes recorded by the debt office in revamping the hitherto moribund Domestic Debt Market and the successful launch of the Nigerian flag in the International Capital Market with its debut 500 million USD Eurobond issuance in 2011 and subsequent issuances in 2013 to raise funds towards financing the deficits in the national budget.

    Dr. Nwankwo said the DMO assisted the 36 States of the Federation and the FCT to establish their own Debt Management Departments (DMDs) and the fiscal stabilisation intervention of the DMO which led to the restructuring of the debts owed to banks by some States into long tenured bonds.

  • ‘Meltdown is an opportunity for believers to shine’

    ‘Meltdown is an opportunity for believers to shine’

    President of Uche Ume Evangelistic Ministries International with headquartered in Umuahia, Abia State, Rev. Uche Ume, has been in full-time ministry since 1996. He spoke with Sunday Oguntola on how Nigerians can experience true, positive changes. Excerpts:  

    Do you have any word on what to expect this year?

    Everybody sensitive to what is happening and what God is saying will know that we have actually come to the point where we need to go back to God.

    Presently, the economies of nations are failing; the technical knowhow of people are failing and the expertise of men is failing even the securities of sophisticated nations are being messed up.

    At a time like this, what we need the most is heaven’s solution. For instance, you don’t take a car produced by Peugeot to Toyota to rectify its fault but you take it back to Peugeot for repairs. The earth is the product of God and if anything is going wrong, we need to go back to God.

    We came from him and we are His products so if there is any challenge, we must go back to him. Let me tell you the truth 2016 is the year that many who used to be up will go down; it is a year when many who used to be rich will become poor.

    Many people that used to feed well will no longer feed well. It is also one year that some people that used to be on the ground will be lifted but it all depends on how one relates to God and what one pays attention to.

    What does this portend for Christians?

    We should do what Joseph did. He accessed the mind of God and got ideas for the problems of his days. I believe that if it were to be the believers of today, they would pray that the seven years abundance would come to pass and cancel the seven years of lack but it was in the seven years of lack that God lifted Joseph.

    The promise of God in the life of Joseph was fulfilled in that seven years of lack. Pharaoh never needed him in the seven years of abundance; Joseph became relevant in those seven years of lack because he had supernatural ideas on how to preserve food that could keep the nation going during the seven years of lack.

    If there is anything we need now, it is the supernatural idea, everything in the natural has failed and it will continue to fail. There is nothing any man can do about it. There are certain things that people do which are just trials and errors. They try this policy; they see that it is not working, they change it but we shouldn’t continue like that; what we need is supernatural idea.

    This is the time that the Joseph of our generation should manifest and say exactly what God is saying.  When you check what is happening across the world, you will realise that men do not reign by their certificate or education, they reign by ideas, great men of the world are not men of certificates; there is nothing wrong with education.

    I love education and I went to school and we study every day but the truth of the matter is that the majority of those who are making impact, those who have become a source of blessings to others, those who make others smile, who have given other people jobs and pay them salaries are not doing so because of their certificates or education.

    No, it is all about divine ideas which entail telling somebody what to do. If there is any time that Nigeria as a nation needs God the most, it is now and I want to say it here that the days of asking people to go and seek God on behalf of any individual is over. God wants people who will be in His presence because there are two kinds of blessings that we get whenever we are in his presence, especially when it has to do with prayer.

     

    We get the blessing of changing our environment and also the blessing of changing of our inside. For some time, this nation has experienced what can be referred to as collective prayers. I call it a prayer collection, which only changes our environments but the inside is not changed.

    Today, we talk about corruption. Most of the people that you see that are taking the money that does not belong to them still claim that they seek God. The outside is changed but the inside is not changed but whenever the inside of the individual is changed you discover that such a person would want to live for others by putting smiles on their faces.

    How do you assess President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration?

    As a matter of fact, I believe that it is God that enthrones people; the Bible says that if there are powers that be, they are ordained by God. No matter what a man does, if God does not want the person to be on the seat of power, he can’t get there so the fact that God allowed President Buhari to be on the seat of power means that his emergency is the will of God.

    But I have nothing to say in assessing this government until I give it sometime because many Nigerians have so many expectations when the President came on board; our minds are opened, our eyes are fixed. So, we are waiting to see the results. We want to see change happens in the area of economy, security, power and other sectors.

    However, we cannot say that he is doing well or that he is not doing well. We are just watching but I think that the foundation is being laid so we are watching and praying for him to succeed. But my counsel for President Buhari is that he should go for results because the common man in Nigeria wants the change to reach him. Buhari should not talk about results; he should go for results.

    People don’t doubt results. Whether someone loves or hates you, once the result is there nobody can doubt results so he should fix his eyes on how to give this nation the results that the citizens are yearning for. Once he can give them the results, there is nothing that pessimists can do because you don’t doubt results. Once the nation can experience change, everybody will believe in him. So I will advise the president to go for results.

    Some people are of the view that President Buhari is not objective in the current war against corruption, do you agree with such opinion?

    Well, I am not a politician but what I will say on this matter is that whoever that has taken the money that should be used to develop this nation should return such money. Whether such people are in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP); All Progressives Congress (APC) or any other political party, they should bring the money back for the purpose for which it was meant.

    On whether Buhari is objective or going after the opposition party members, my opinion is that they should recover the money, no matter whoever is involved.

    As a stakeholder, what is your take on Abia State governorship tussle between Dr Okezie Ikpeazu and Dr Alex Otti?

    I am not of PDP or All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA). The battle in my state is about PDP and APGA. In my ministry, I have PDP members and APGA members but my stand has always been that leadership is about making impact on people’s lives.

    What is life’s worth if you cannot be a blessing to your generation? What are we living for? Remember what I said before, when you serve the people very well, you don’t need to campaign vigorously for them to vote you in.

    Governor Ikpeazu just assumed office, Dr Otti has not entered, so what we are talking about is not even about governance; it is about election, who won and who did not win.  The Election Petition Tribunal has passed its judgment; the Appeal Court has passed its own judgment. We are waiting for the Supreme Court, which will in a short while rule on the matter.

    Whosoever emerges, we will give him our support for the good of the State. The truth is that Abians know that their votes can count; the politicians are aware that power is with the people and that the opinions of the people now count. What is happening is also a lesson to whoever gets there; four years is not too far from today. If you don’t do well, the people will vote you out.

    You’re set for this year’s camp meeting, what should the participants expect from this event?

    Our annual camp meeting is in line with what I am talking about. We call it Eagles’ Camp Meeting where we teach and lead people to prayer. It is where we pray with you; we don’t pray for you. We let the people know that they can do it for themselves. We want people to come, hear the word of God and we pray with them.

    Eagles’ Camp meeting is a meeting where you do it yourself. It is where we make people realise that they too can relate with God and that there is no superhuman when it has to do with God. He treats people equally. Whereas another person can pray for you and gets answer, you can also pray and get answer.

     

  • Global meltdown:  Paris climate talks and Nigeria’s strategy

    Global meltdown: Paris climate talks and Nigeria’s strategy

    On December 12, 2015, Nigeria,  alongside 194 other countries, adopted a resolution. It was to reduce global carbon emission which took the centre stage at the Conference of Parties 21 (COP21) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Paris, France. Assistant Editor SEUN AKIOYE who was at the conference reports on how Nigeria will fulfill its obligations.

    Fabius Laurent, the President of the Conference of Parties 21 (COP21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) looked like a rock star after he banged the gavel, signifying the adoption of a historic climate change agreement in Paris, France.

    There were shouts, applause and raw show of emotions as it dawned on the delegates from almost 200 countries, who converged on Paris that history was unfolding in their life-time.

    Laurent himself could not hide his emotions. He stood up raising up the hands of French President Francois Hollande and United Nations (UN) Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon in a victory sign.

    “The Paris agreement allows each delegation and group of countries to go back home with their heads held high. Our collective effort is worth more than the sum of our individual effort. Our responsibility to history is immense,” Laurent said to a sustained applause.

    But, Laurent, the French Foreign Minister, and former Prime Minister, has not always been the rock star of what is now known as the Paris Climate Agreement. For a little over two weeks, he faced intense pressure and criticism over the fate of the agreement which forced him almost to the limit of his diplomatic skills.

    Also, the ghost of the failure of Copenhagen climate talks in 2009 hung heavily on the conference venue at Le Bourget, the sleepy community, north of Paris.  The Copenhagen talks have been considered a major failure and it seemed early that the Paris talks would follow the same pattern.

    The road to Paris

    There is the belief  that Africa has not been a historic contributor to climate change, accounting for less than two to three per cent of the world’s GreenHouse Gas (GHG) emission. But, its effect has been felt largely on the continent due to several factors, including underdevelopment, high prevalence of conflict and subsequent diseases, the location of the continent itself and the high dependence on rain-fed agriculture.

    There are grim predictions for the continent if Paris failed in a concrete agreement that would reduce global emission to lower than two degreeCelsius.  If the current trend continues, Africa’s annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) loss would be between 1.5 to three per cent by 2030. Besides, famine and wars are expected to rise even as the continent’s coastal cities like Lagos, the Niger Delta and Durban, would be submerged. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change also predicted that about 250 million Africans will be exposed to increased water stress by 2020 and that Lake Chad, with an estimated area of 26,000 square kilometers, has  been reduced to just about 10 per cent of its size in 1960.

    Lake Chad is economic lifeline to more than 30 million people in Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad and Niger.

    In a report titled: “Turn the heat down”, released in 2013, the World Bank predicted that dry and arid regions in Southern and Western Africa will increase by 10 per cent by 2030 and if the global temperature increases from 1.5 to two degree Celsius by 2040, African farmers will lose between 40-80 per cent of their crop land while yields from rain-fed agriculture will suffer reduction by at least 50 per cent by 2020. This will adversely affect food security, fueling climate migration, unrest and violence.

    The target of keeping the climate “well below two degrees” according to activists and African developmentpartners is a little too late for the continent. “Two degree Celsius is already harmful – with what you are looking at, an increase of about 3.5 degree Celsius  for the continent because of Africa’s location. 1.5 degree Celsius would be reasonable. We want to see better ambition by people not submitting what is convenient for them but what is right,”Anthony Nyong, coordinator of the African Development Bank (AfDB) delegation said.

    The continent resolved at COP21 to speak with one voice, apart from a strong contingent in the African Group of Negotiators (AGN), which is chaired by Nagmeldin Elhassan from Sudan. The continent also had a strong voice in the G77+China.

    Of particular concern to the Africans at the Paris Conference were the issues of  carbon emission reduction to1.5 degree Celsius, financial pledge , loss and damage and common but differentiated responsibility clauses.

    At the Copenhagen talks in 2009, a pledge was extracted from developed countries to contribute $100 billion  yearly until 2020 to help developing nations combat climate change. But by 2014, the fund had only yielded $62 billion, a situation which did not go down well with the AGN.

    Therefore, when the talks opened in Paris, it was a better prepared Africa and optimistic world that converged on Le Bourget. Laurent said at the start of the conference: “This will be a COP of action, it’s clear, it’s true.”

    The villains, the heroes

    Trouble began early in the talks with allegations that developed and wealthy nations had aligned against the main clauses of the proposed agreement, including Loss and Damage, reduction of GHG to 1.5 and financial pledges. But, none was more divisive than the challenge of fossil fuel, free world and keeping the global climate under control.

    The initial negotiations were conducted by country negotiators, after which ministers for the Environment deliberated on the draft agreement. But, it was by no means an easy task, led by the Philippines, the vulnerable countries forum wanted global carbon eradication by 2050 but the United States (US) and other developed countries prefer to shift the deadline to 2100.

    “In the last 60 years, the world climate has reached 1.0 degree Celsius and in the last 10 years, we have reached 100 per cent extreme weather, imagine if 2050 is not achieved, we are roasted,” one of the negotiators from South Africa said.

    He was not the only one who had the feeling that the world will be roasted; Godwin Ojo of Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN), shared such sentiment. “We want a de-carbonised economy, a move from fossil fuel. Anything short of 1.5 degrees is roasting Africa; it is destroying mother earth; by that, Africa is already at 3.5, so, we cannot afford to go higher. The developed countries should live up to their historic responsibility,” Ojo said.

    But India, an emerging industrialised country and Saudi Arabia, a major oil producing country reportedly did not buy into the idea. They were opposed to anything but 2.0 degrees. Also, all the Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) – a set of adaptive and mitigation measures each party intends to adopt against climate change – submitted by parties, pointed to a carbon reduction of 2.7 to 3.5 degrees. That is bad news for Africa and other vulnerable countries.

    The US also reportedly frowned at the Loss and Damage clause which would have allowed countries, especially in Africa claim damages from historic polluters. The US frowned at a legally binding agreement, which would have been impossible to pass through the US congress.

    Nigeria and the climate challenge

    Environment Minister Amina Mohammed shone like a star at the talks. Until her appointment, she was the SpecialAdvisor on Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to the UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon. So, she was on a familiar turf.

    Nigeria submitted its INDC on November 28 at 12:24:55pm, one month after it was prepared by the Ministry of the Environment and  a few days before COP21.

    “The INDC is not just an ordinary document, we have to be careful in completing it and we didn’t delay intentionally. Many developing countries don’t understand what should go into the INDC. We had to follow due process, get the buy-in of all the stakeholders and collect information before we arrived at our conclusion. It was when the government understands what is in the INDC that it gave its accent,”Adeoye Adejuwon, the lead negotiator for Nigeria told The Nation.

    Nigeria has had its fair share of the climate change calamity. For many years, the coastal cities and communities have been especially prone to ocean encroachment. There are predictions about Lagos being submerged in flood and coastal communities like Ayetoro in Ilaje Local Government Area of Ondo State already lost more than half of its land to the ocean.

    The Permanent Secretary in the Environment Ministry, Bukar Hassan, said: “If you look at the sea level rise, in about 30 years, we may lose the whole of Lagos. The rainfall pattern in the northeast has changed. We can’t predict the quantum and distribution; food security is affected and that has, apart from the one caused by insurgency, we have climate refugees in the North and the South.”

    According to a 2009 DFID study, if no adaptation action is taken, between two to 11 per cent  of Nigeria’s GDP could be lost by 2020. This projection is not to be taken lightly as the  Post Disaster Need Assessment (PDNA) Report of the 2012 flood  showed that the total damage caused  by the flood was $16.9 billion, representing 1.4 per cent of the real GDP growth in that year.

    “In this regard, climate change poses a significant threat to the achievement of development goals, especially those related to eliminating poverty and hunger and promoting environmental sustainability,” the Nigerian report said.

    This situation set the tone for Nigeria’s “ambitious INDC”, Hassan said.  According to the document, the objective is a reduction of GHG from Business As Usual (BAU) by 2030 while growing the economy by five percent annually.

    According to officials, Nigeria would reduce her carbon emission by 20 per cent unconditionally, and if given international assistance, rise to 45 per cent. The key measures to achieve this would be: work towards ending gas flaring by 2030; work towards off-grid solar PV of 13GW (13,000MW); Efficient gas generators; two per cent per year energy efficiency (30 per cent by 2030); transport shift from car to mass transit; improve electricity grid and climate smart agriculture and reforestation.

    Nigeria’s estimated emission currently stands at around two tonnes CO2e (equivalent carbon dioxide) per person and if current trends continue, it will rise to 900 million tonnes per year or 3.4tonnes CO2e per person by 2030. However, under the conditional reduction, by 2030, Nigeria’s emission will reduce to two tonnes CO2e. Historically, between 1850 and 2010, Nigeria has emitted 2,564.02 million tonnes of GHG.

    In 2012, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) adopted the Nigeria Climate Change Policy, Response and Strategy with a goal to “to foster low-carbon, high growth economic development and build a climate resilient society.”

    The approach to achieving this would be through the implementation of mitigation measures that will promote low carbon as well as sustainable and high economic growth; enhancement of national capacity to adapt to climate change; raising of climate change-related science, technology and R&D to a new level that will enhance better participate in international scientific and technological cooperation on climate change by the country; significantlyincreasing public awareness and involve private sector participation in addressing the challenges of climate change; strengthening of national institutions and mechanisms (policy, legislative and economic) to establish a suitable and functional framework for climate governance.

    Adaptation, mitigation strategy

    The fight against climate change is predicated on both mitigation and adaptation strategies and Nigeria has adopted some strategies in key sectors. For instance, in agriculture, the government plans to adopt improved  system for both crops and livestock including the introduction of drought-resistant crops, implement strategies for improved resource management. In energy, Nigeria plans to increased protective margins in construction and placement of energy infrastructure (i.e. higher standards and specifications) expand sustainable energy sources and decentralise transmission in order to reduce vulnerability of energy infrastructure to climate impacts.

    In forestry, Nigeria will strengthen the implementation of the national community-based forest resources management programme while supporting the review and implementation of the national forest policy. The country will also develop and maintain a frequent forest inventory system to facilitate monitoring of forest status; and initiate a research programme on a range of climate change-related topics, including long-term impacts of climatic shifts on closed forests.

    In transport and communications, the government plans to undertake risk assessment and risk reduction measures to increase the resilience of the transportation and communication sectors. Strengthen existing transportation and communications’ infrastructure through early efforts to identify and implement all possible ‘no regrets’ actions.

    But, despite these set objectives, Nigeria aligned with countries like India, to oppose an early end to fossil fuel extraction. “We are an energy thirst country. What we are generating today is not sufficient. So, if coal is the answer, why not?” Hassan said.

    Also Cross River State Governor, Prof Ben Ayade, who doubles as the chairman of African Governors Forum on Climate Change, said Nigeria cannot transit from fossil fuel now.  “Renewable energy is not the way for Africans at this point in time. Renewable energy means an end to the sale of hydro-carbon and that means Nigeria should stop exporting crude oil. But, they are busy doing research, inventing technology, using solar energy and wind power.

    “When all of that happens, when the oil price goes down, when you stop producing oil, what are you going to use as an alternative?  Renewable energy must follow with development, it must follow with technology. Africa cannot be in a haste to adopt renewable technology,” Ayade argued.

    According to the governor,  the answer is controlled utilisation of fossil fuel. He said: “I would rather have you use fossil fuel with mitigate measures than to cap it and focus on renewable energy. While that technology works for them, it is harmful for our economy.”

    But, this position contrasts sharply with the generally held view that fossil fuel consumption is largely responsible for climate change disasters. Former Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mrs. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, said Nigeria must move away from subsidising dirty energy.

    She said: “Almost three quarters of infrastructure that Africa needs we still don’t have it. That means the power we need, the road and the railway, we still cannot get these infrastructures and have it in a way that is friendly to climate change, that lowers emission and puts us on a low-carbon growth path.

    “We are looking at power and looking at renewables. We are not saying renewables should be everything because Africa should have a mix. We can still use gas to some extent, but we should increase the renewables.”

    But, frontline environmentalist  and Executive Director, Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HoMEF) Nnimmo Bassey, said Nigeria must embrace renewable energy 100 per cent.

    “Nigeria should move away from oil. We made a lot from oil and lose a lot to oil theft. We need to be creative and invest in areas that sustain lives. We have all this sun; Nigeria should jump into renewable energy,” Bassey said in Paris.

    Hope rising

    After two weeks of intense negotiations and expectation, the Paris agreement was finally adopted on December 12. It was an emotional moment for world leaders, politicians and activists, as the agreement was the first legally binding climate change agreement with far-reaching impacts on the future of the world.

    “You’ve done it! Reached an ambitious agreement; a binding agreement; a universal agreement. Never will I be able to express more gratitude to a conference. You can be proud to stand before your children and grandchildren,” Hollande said.

    Ban Ki-moon said: “We have entered a new era of global cooperation on one of the most complex issues ever to confront humanity. For the first time, every country in the world has pledged to curb emissions, strengthen resilience and join in common cause to take common climate action. This is a resounding success for multilateralism.”

    The main objective of the historic climate change agreement is to keep a global temperature rise this century well below two degree Celsius and to drive efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

    The agreement also captured the essential elements which includes: mitigation – reducing emissions fast enough to achieve the temperature goal;  transparency system and global stock-take – accounting for climate action; adaptation – strengthening ability of countries to deal with climate impacts; Loss and Damage – strengthening ability to recover from climate impacts and support – including finance, for nations to build clean, resilient futures.

    There is also hope in the horizon for vulnerable and developing countries like Nigeria as “unparalleled announcements of financial supports” were made.  “We have seen unparallelled announcements of financial support for both mitigation and adaptation from a multitude of sources both before and during COP21. Under the Paris Agreement, the provision of finance, from multiple sources will clearly be taken to a new level, which is of critical importance to the most vulnerable,” Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC said.

    Nigeria is already looking beyond the Paris talks. On arrival from the conference, the Minister of the Environment began an on-the -spot visit to degraded areas in the country for  impact assesement.

    Among the places visited were:  the Niger Delta,  Alpha Beach and Makoko in Lagos, the sand dune in Yobe and the Sharada industrial pollution site in Kano.

    The assessment was aimed at setting the pace for a comprehensive response to the challenge of climate change even as Nigeria plans to hold on to its leadership role in Africa.

    President Muhammadu Buhari has pledged his commitment to reducing the GHG as well as tackle the climate change challenge in the country.

    But, the implementation would rest on the shoulders of Hajia Mohammed as the envionment minsiter.