Tag: militarisation

  • NeoColonialism, militarisation, and democracy

    In  global  diplomacy this week France  and Italy, staunch  allies in the EU  and  NATO  were  at each  other’s throat  over migration, with the Italians blaming  French Neocolonialism  for  the death of Africans fleeing   through  the Mediterranean  into  Europe.  In   Nigeria,  former  President Olusegun Obasanjo  continued his assault  on the  reelection bid  of  President Muhammadu  Buhari. Just  as   the   government  continues  with the prosecution of the nation’s CJN  over  false  declaration  of assets   after  brushing aside  legal  irritants and constraints in the law courts  to derail  the governments’  resolve.  These  issues  have  broad historical, economic  and ethical    underpinnings  that we shall  examine in all ramifications today.

    As an African and Nigerian following  global  development  and history   diligently  I was very  pleased  with the spat  between Italy  and France over  African migrants . Indeed  the two Italian  Vice PMs,  Luigi   Di  Maio,     Matteo  Salvini   in the populist  coalition in power in Italy  have not given  French  President Emmanuel  Macron  any  breathing space over the issue of migration.  One of them Di  Maio said  if  France  had decolonized  as it should Africans will   be in Africa  and not be lying dead in the Mediterranean.  Which  is a real  home truth not only   for  Macron’s  France  but  also to Theresa  May’s    Brexit   ridden  Britain  which  colonized  Nigeria.  Indeed I intend  to    show  that British  decolonisation  ineptitude  and  shoddy  hand over of power to  Nigerians is as blamable  for Nigeria’s  present  political  woes.  Just  like the Italians  are blaming France for  Africans  fleeing poverty  and dying  on  the Mediterranean  sea.  Indeed the fact  that  the major  and persistent   critic of the re election of  our    president  was once a military   and civilian president,  just like the president he is  attacking for ineptitude,  shows  clearly  how militarised  our  democracy  has become  since Independence  in 1960 . Again,  that too   is   obvious   in  the way and manner   that  the British not  only  decolonized  poorly    al  but  also    entrenched,  deliberately   an insidious and precarious Neocolonialism  in  Nigeria .

    In  the  case of the  CJN trial  and the efforts  made  by the CJN’s  lawyers  to stop  the trial, it is clear  that  the accused  has  something to hide. Otherwise  why  can  he not  see  that he cannot be a judge  in his own case?  The  CJN cannot be a referee  and  a player  at  the same time as that is against  the principle of natural  justice.  Surely  a CJN  should   know  that  as well as what  to  do to  avoid further  opprobrium on this  matter. QED

    We  go  back  to the condemnation of France   by Italy   for the global  migration problem  especially  with regard to  Africa.  According  to reports Matteo  Salvini    leader  of the Italian   League  said’ In  Africa some take wealth  from the continent and the people  and France  is one of them ‘.  That  is  the truth  but the fact that it is being said by  a EU  leader  makes it very  important.  France  has protested by summoning the Italian Ambassador in Paris.  But  that is like fake  news  because  France is  guilty  as charged.  In  real  fact  the French  have  always  been  in charge of  IMF,  the bank  used   by the west in giving aid to developing nations  including   African  nations.  The  last  two MDs  of  the IMF  including the present  one, Christine  Legard  were from France   and  the IMF  is on record  as ruining  the governments of  Sfrican nations including  Nigeria  by giving loans  with crippling conditionalities  which  created  failed  states like Somalia .  France still  has troops in African  nations to make them  toe its line or risk their leaders  being removed.  It  happened  in Ivory  Coast recently  and Gbagbo  is still in ICC custody even  after  being  cleared  at  the trial   in the Hague    for lack  of evidence.  It    may  be  poor  consolation  and  a  belated  one too  that an  European  nation  is blaming another for  exploiting  African  nations under  colonialism  and neo  colonialism.  But   then   the truth  has prevailed and France  must  at  least  show some  compunction or  shame   instead  of  being hypocritical  about  its  shady  past in Africa.

    Britain  too  should  share  part  of the blame with France  for exploiting  Africans  and creating the poverty leading to  African   migration to Europe through the Mediterranean. In  this case I hold  Britain responsible  for  the lopsided  democracy  it left  Nigeria with and the census  figure  that environmental,  geographic  and demographic  indices.  Nigeria’s  political and parliamentary  seats   and representation have  been based  on these census  figures  and that  has created a dangerous  tension  that gave one part of the nation an  advantage over the other.  It  has led to many  military intervention led by Northerners and has ensured  that the North has had  more leaders  at  the center  than  the   south.

    In  addition globalisation has  also  brought in democratization hand in hand  with  marketization  and  privatization. All  of which  have led to immense increase in the gap  between the rich  and the poor resulting in poverty  and  dismal  growth for  Nigria.  The  military interventions  also  created a class of supper  rich former military leaders  who  were able to shed their  braided  hats  and boots   for  flowing gowns and  toga  to  take over  our  governments   and legislature as senators and MPs.  Corruption  and rigging  of elections  have  become our  political  culture.  That explains  why  the loudest  critic  of the system  of politics  we  run  is also  the   biggest  beneficiary  and is  never  satisfied  with  the status  quo.  Yet  in furtherance of  the   ruling clique  motto  of  espirit de  corps   or   dog   does  not eat   dog,  the mighty  critic  still  attended a meeting of former Heads of  States  and still  shook  hands  with the man he said  was  sick in mind  and spirit.  At  least  he could  have stayed  away  and avoided  contamination  with those  he has assigned to hell for leading the  nation astray and into  perdition  so eloquently  in his   last  two salvos  against  this same government  that hosted him in Abuja.  But  then  such  is the nature of  our democracy bequeathed  to us  by  the  British and spoon  fed  by them in supervising rigged  elections  with  international  observers whose governments  are always the first to congratulate  the successful riggers.  That  in a way  explains the glee I feel  at British embarrassment over Brexit.   A  situation where our former colonisers  do  not know  where   or   what    they  want  with  the EU over Brexit   could   be  very   embarrassing and   shameful   for  those  who  operate  the Mother of  Parliaments .  Certainly  with  the benefit of hindsight  the British  should  know in their Brexit  overdose  and inebriation ,  that those who  sow the wind of colonialism must  reap  its whirlwind.  Surely   the chicken  has come home to roost  for  British  colonialism. Just  like the Italians  told  the French  on the issue of African  migrants fleeing poverty  and dying  in the Mediterranean.  Once  again, long live the Federal  Republic of  Nigeria.

  • APC leaders condemn militarisation of elections

    APC leaders condemn militarisation of elections

    •Nigeria should prepare for 2015, says Aregbesola
    •Tambuwal faults IG

    all Progressives Congress (APC) leaders have condemned the militarisation of elections in the country.

    They spoke yesterday at a victory colloquium, organised by The Gazelle News, for Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola at the Eko Hotel, Victoria Island.

    The party’s National Legal Adviser, Muiz Banire, in a paper titled: “Osun Election: A Pathway to Nigeria’s Democratic Growth”, said the government does not have the constitutional power to use soldiers during elections.

    He said the militarisation of Osun State few days to the election, in the name of providing security, was the misuse of power by the government.

    Banire said: “The machinery of federalism had been wiped out as the only thing the Federal Government did not do was declare a state of emergency in Osun.

    “Whenever these agents and merchants of death shot into the air, the determined people of Osun hailed the bullet rains with the slogan of ‘APC’ or Aregbesola for second term.’’

    The APC chieftain said Aregbesola won the election because he was popular. He said on the eve of the election, there was total clampdown on APC leaders, who were arrested and detained without justification.

    He urged the party leadership to field popular candidates in the 2015 elections, saying it was the only way to checkmate rigging.

    The moderator, Kawu Baraje, said the PDP was relying on the military to rig the 2015 elections. He urged Nigerians to resist the Federal Government’s impunity.

    The APC chieftain added that the PDP was a sinking ship and it was bent on truncating democracy in Nigeria through unconstitutional acts.

    Baraje, who represented former President Olusegun Obasanjo as the chairman, said: “The resolution of the people to defend their mandate became a serious challenge to the PDP. Soldiers are being illegally engaged by the government.

    “If they were deployed to Sambisa forest to search for the Chibok girls at the appropriate time, I am very sure they would have been reunited with their parents.”

    The Special Guest of Honour, Aminu Tambuwal, said he was been vindicated in view of what was happening in the PDP.

    He said the reign of impunity in the party was legendary, noting that when Ondo State Governor Olusegun Mimiko and the Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly defected to the PDP, they were not victimised.

    Tambuwal said Nigeria needed a good leader, one who believes in peace, progress and development of the country and the welfare of the people.

    The Speaker of the House of Representatives said he was miffed by the pronouncement of the Acting Inspector General of Police, that he (Tambuwal) should vacate his office having left the PDP for APC.

    He said: “This country belongs to all of us. We must come together to ensure that we get the right leadership in 2015.

    “The IGP did not say Ondo Speaker should vacate his seat. Why is he now making such pronouncement in my own case?

    “Is it a case of different laws for different people? Anyway, I have gone to court, so I rest my case.

    “I thank Nigerians who stood by me in the face of this impunity. It is our right to decide who we want to relate with and there is nobody who can dictate to me who I should relate with.”

    Aregbesola said the situation in Burkina Faso was a signal to Nigerians to gird their loins and prepare for the general elections.

    The governor called on the people of Burkina Faso not to allow military rule after the exit of President Blaise Compaore.

    Aregbesola urged the Burkinabes to carry the revolution that ousted Compaore to its logical conclusion by forming a national government to conduct election soon.

    He said: “We should gird our loins and prepare for any eventualities that may accompany the 2015 general elections.

    “I say this because the trend has shown that the election will not come as easy as we may want to think as it is clear that PDP will want to use force to retain power.

    “The PDP is not a party that is not unbeatable. For if we beat PDP in Osun, it means we can beat it anywhere and we must beat it everywhere.”

    Former Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Ikeja branch, Chairman Monday Ubani said the Osun election had provided a template for future elections.

    “In Osun State, stomach infrastructure was also used as a campaign strategy. The people collected whatever item that was offered them, but came out to vote for their choice.”

    At the ceremony were former Vice President Atiku Abubakar (represented by former Lagos State Commissioner for Youths and Sports Adeniji Adele); former Osun State Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola; Lagos State Deputy Governor Mrs. Adejoke Orelope -Adefulire.

    Others are Osun State House of Assembly Speaker Najeem Salam; House of Representatives Minority Speaker Hakeem Gbajabiamila; APC National Publicity Secretary Lai Muhammed and others

  • Aregbesola decries militarisation of poll

    Aregbesola decries militarisation of poll

    •EU urges governor to seek legal option

    Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola has condemned the militarisation of last Saturday’s election.

    He decried the show of “brute force” by security agents deployed in the state by the Federal Government.

    Aregbesola spoke at the Government House in Osogbo, the state capital, while hosting the European Union Election Monitoring Group.

    He said voting is a minute aspect of a democracy and should not be backed by force, so that people can freely choose their leaders.

    Aregbesola condemned the “commando-like manner” hooded security men operated on the streets and the “unwarranted” arrests of All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftains.

    He said: “Our victory did not come because the federal authority designed it so, but because we were favoured by the people as the best party that can serve them better.

    “Or how do you rationalise the presence of strangers (security personnel), people I cannot control, who took over the administration of the security of my state with impunity, which adversely affected life in the state?

    “It is humiliating, worse sort of what a unit of government like ours should suffer. There was a deliberate attempt to muzzle the people’s voice.

    “By now we should know that voting is just a routine aspect of democracy and, even at that, the people must not be denied their freedom to choose their leader freely.

    “We must prevent the Federal Government from the recurring culture of arbitrarily invading the territory of a unit within the federal structure. This is an abuse of power.”

    The European Union Election Monitoring Group advised Aregbesola to address his complaints legally.

    The group’s coordinator, Paul Edwards, said strict adherence to the rule of law was the best way to deepen democracy in Nigeria.

    Edward said: “We are here to congratulate you on your victory in Saturday’s election. Besides, our mission here is also to find out from you about the conduct of the election. We have observed the election across the state and have our reports.

    “In any election, there are bound to be issues. But it is our opinion that whatever the complaint you have, you should choose the legal option to seek remedy.

    “Let us rely on the instrumentality of the law to purse whatever anomaly or violation of rights we have suffered. Let us always use the legal method to stop the impunity used by one unit of government against the other. It is through this option that we can deepen democratic institutions wherever it is practised in the world. If you send your complaints to the EU, we shall take note of it and act accordingly within the framework of the law.”

    Aregbesola hailed the group’s commitment to the development of democracy in Nigeria.

  • Falana decries militarisation of poll

    Falana decries militarisation of poll

    Lagos lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) has urged Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola to ensure that those who infringed on the fundamental rights of residents during Saturday’s election are brought to book.

    Congratulating the governor on his victory, Falana said the “unprecedented militarisation of the electoral process should not be left unchallenged”, adding: “The brazen impunity that characterised the governorship election in Osun State must stop.”

    In a statement yesterday, he said: “An election that is fully militarised cannot be said to be fair and free. An election in which people were arrested and detained and disenfranchised cannot be said to be credible.

    “Therefore, Aregbesola, as the chief security officer of Osun State, must ensure that those who are responsible for the breaches of several provisions of the Electoral Act 2010, as amended and the infringements of the fundamental rights of innocent people are brought to book.

    “The deployment of 73,000 armed security personnel for the election by President Goodluck Jonathan was a declaration of war on the law abiding citizens of Osun State. More disturbing was the deployment of snipers, who were permitted to wear masks. The criminal elements shot sporadically into the air to intimidate the people.”

  • OSUN POLL:Hues and cries over militarisation

    OSUN POLL:Hues and cries over militarisation

    PERHAPS for years to come, history will not forget in a hurry, President Goodluck Jonathan for introducing military into election monitoring in the country. He started with Edo and continued in Ondo, Anambra, Ekiti and now Osun.

    Jonathan, while speaking in Osun State last Saturday in the Peoples Democratic Party’s campaign rally, he declared that there would be no going back on the decision of the Federal Government to massively deploy troops in Osun for today’s election.

    The president, who was apparently reacting to the loud criticism that greeted the vast security and military deployment for the Ekiti State governorship election in June, pointed out that nothing would stop the heavy deployment of security agents in Osun State for the August 9 governorship election, adding that the deployment was targeted at safeguarding the security of the lives and property of residents during the election.

    But the president’s statement has come under criticism from those who believe that government might use the troops’ deployment to intimidate the electorate in favour of the its preferred candidate.

    They based their argument on the fact that the Federal Government had in the past used its power to subdue perceived opposition and crippled their activities on the pretence of maintaining peace and order in the past. This was evident in Ekiti where some of the leaders of the opposition were arrested and detained throughout the period of the election without any reason.

    The former Interim National Chairman of the APC, Chief Adebisi Akande, noted that the militarisation with sporadic shooting by the DSS officers everywhere in the state was meant to scare away voters and intimidate supporters of the APC.

    Akande lamented: “In the recently held governorship election in Ekiti State, hundreds of APC supporters and leaders were hounded into detention on the eve of the election only for the Federal Government to hoodwink the global community to believe that the election was free and fair when in truth, the process had been skewed in favour of the PDP in the pre-election processes.”

    Some, however, have said that President Jonathan reserves the right to ensure that the election is violent-free by deploying troops.

    Prior to today’s election in Osun, series of violent clashes between rival political parties became the order of the day. On several occasions, thugs allegedly sent by a rival party clashed with those they felt were obstacles to the chances of their party at the polls. Few unlucky members lost their lives in the fracas, while some who were fortunate escaped only with injuries.

    Condemning the deploying of troops for elections, the National Chairman and former Presidential candidate, National Action Council, NAC Dr. Olapade Agoro, warned that  the development could come back to haunt the nation.

    Agoro  explained that such an action was “not only an apparent rule of force in a democracy, but a reckless display of raw power, a condemnable intimidation of civility and a flagrant abuse of fundamental rights of the expected voters.”

    Speaking in the same vein the chairman of Coalition Against Corrupt Leaders (CACOL), Comrade Debo Adeniran, lamented that the intervention of military men in democratic process is an aberration. Adeniran pointed out that such an action “is antithetical to the spirit of true democracy. The police should be well-equipped to provide security during elections; we shouldn’t be inviting ‘khaki boys’ from their barracks to intervene in the democratic process.”

    The human rights activist argued that the militarisation of Osun State may influence the outcome of the election and therefore urged that the soldiers should be kept in the barracks until the situation demands their coming out.

    Political pundits are of the view that if the Federal Government did not want to truncate the ongoing democratic experiment, it is necessary to be as neutral as possible and make sure that the security provided is not targeted at the intimidation and harassment of the opposition.

    By so doing, they argued that the people of Osun State will be at the liberty to vote any candidate of their choice without any molestation and intimidation.

  • Atiku decries militarisation  of democracy

    Atiku decries militarisation of democracy

    Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has said despite the end of military rule over a decade ago, the culture of political intolerance and impunity still pervades the country.

    Atiku spoke on Monday in Switzerland as a guest speaker of the Geneva School of Diplomacy and International Relations.

    He regretted that in Nigeria and other parts of Africa’s opposition members are treated as enemies of the state.

    In his paper, entitled: Deepening Democracy in Nigeria: Implications for Africa, the former Vice-President noted that as a result of lip service to democratic principles, “disregard for rules and regulations and the utter impunity with which they are committed” has led to what he called “the militarisation of democracy”.

    According to him, many retired military chiefs, who came into power as politicians entered the democratic arena without being able to shed their military mindsets, thereby exacerbating the culture of intolerance and entrenching impunity, which characterises today’s political reality in Nigeria.

    The former Vice-President admitted that despite the democratic challenges, the freedom of speech, association, the right to organise politically and the liberty to criticise the government were restored with the return of democratic rule.

    Atiku also acknowledged that with the new democratic order in Nigeria, the nation’s courts have become more relatively independent, besides the freedom of the press that came with it.

    But he regretted that democratic gains are being threatened by the persistent perception of political opposition as an enemy that has to be crushed “rather than patriots who happen to disagree simply because they hold different political views”.

    Atiku noted that members of the ruling parties, who oppose lack of internal democracy or abuse of power by those occupying executive political offices are either repressed and harassed, thereby undermining the institutions of democracy.

    He argued that Nigeria’s economic growth of 6.5 per cent is far below what is required to “quickly lift millions of Nigerians out of poverty once and for all”.

    The former Vice-President admitted that poor leadership is to blame for the problems he highlighted.

    On democracy, Atiku urged Western democratic nations to play more active and deeper role in helping Nigeria with credible elections.

    He urged Switzerland and other Western nations to go beyond economic investments and exert political pressure on local leaders to “open up the political space”.