A civic technology organisation, MonitNG, has called for the reform of constituency projects in terms of the way they are implemented.
Founder of MonitNG, Uadamen Ilevbaoje, said in a statement that without serious reform and transparency, constituency projects would remain a model built to exploit, not serve, Nigerian citizens.
Ilevbaoje raised the alarm over the use of ministries, departments and agencies of government by the National Assembly to execute constituency projects.
“Even worse, agencies with no technical expertise are now used as executing bodies for construction projects. Ministries meant for research or agriculture are assigned to build markets, install solar street lights, or renovate schools, leading to shoddy results, inflated costs, and loopholes for corruption.
“Where projects do appear completed, they are often of poor quality. Roads wear out within weeks, boreholes break down, and buildings collapse. Contractors frequently cut corners while oversight agencies remain silent. In many cases, the only “benefit” to the community is a photo-op and a few malfunctioning solar lights,” he said.
He also lamented the lack of transparency in empowerment projects carried out by lawmakers.
Ilevbaoje said, “The so-called empowerment programs are no better. Lawmakers distribute cash in envelopes to select individuals without any documentation or recordkeeping. This encourages patronage politics and eliminates transparency.”
According to him, constituency projects, instead of being tools for grassroots development, have become entrenched in corruption.
Read Also: MonitNG expresses concern over poor construction of N7.23bn Argungu bypass road
He said, “What began in 1999 as a tool to address rural underdevelopment in Nigeria has gradually become a mechanism for large-scale corruption. Zonal Intervention Projects (ZIPs), also known as constituency projects, were designed to bridge the gap between government resources and community needs. Today, they are largely used by lawmakers as channels to divert public funds with minimal oversight or accountability.
“Each year, ₦100 billion is shared among Nigeria’s 469 National Assembly members to nominate projects in their constituencies. However, many of these projects either exist only on paper or are poorly executed. The public sees few signs of development but numerous signs of corruption — from abandoned sites and collapsed structures to ghost projects that cannot be traced to any location.
“A common tactic now involves duplicating the same project under different budget codes. Lawmakers secure allocations for a project under ZIP and again under the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP), often with different names but similar descriptions. Usually, only one version of the project gets partially implemented while the other disappears entirely, unchecked.
“Another disturbing trend is the consistent vagueness in project descriptions. Projects are often listed without specific communities or wards, using broad phrases like ‘selected communities’ or ‘various areas.’ This lack of transparency makes it nearly impossible for the public or civil society to verify implementation or track the use of funds.”


