Tag: N5000

  • N5, 000: Who’s the bad economist now?

    N5, 000: Who’s the bad economist now?

    One magic note, irrespective of its utility, will not pull us out of the economic slump

    I confess that while it lasted I found the brouhaha over the Central Bank’s plans to introduce the N5, 000 note something of a hurricane in a very tiny tea cup.

    But on the positive side, the passion it ignited was such that for the first time since the Super Eagles were thrown out of some tournament, we forgot whether were from South-South or North-West!

    Sure, there were all the arguments about how the anticipated currency reforms could set off an inflationary spiral. Many who had these worries were not only critical of the big note, but also pointed to plans to coin the lower end denominations below N100.

    Over the years Nigerians have developed a strange resistance to coins. This manifests in the form of traders simply ignoring the metallic money and fixing prices for the cheapest of items beginning with the lowest of notes.

    This irrational behavior, like most things in the Nigerian economy, has nothing to do with the basic laws of economics. The artificial and opportunistic price hikes are not triggered by demand and supply factors, but by a mindset that cannot be supported by anything in our history.

    From Independence and well into the 80s, our people embraced the coins that were in circulation. It is equally revealing that the same Nigerians, who supposedly have a cultural aversion to coins, gladly use and carry them around when in the UK, US, Italy, South Africa and many other places.

    So is the problem the coin, the evaporation of its value, or some strange mentality we have acquired? I believe that even the irrational has triggers that can be traced. Primary blame must go to the CBN which over the last two decades has allowed the bizarre thinking that paints coins as an inferior repository of value, to take hold.

    When other factors set off inflationary pressures in the economy, and the existing coins were rendered nearly worthless, the apex bank ought to have released not just a new set of notes, but also coins responding to our new reality.

    They should have put in place policies and rules that counter the notion that only paper denominations that count. Traders, business people and public transportation owners should have been encouraged to have coin boxes in place.

    The CBN gave the impression it was not really interested in coins because banks were never sanctioned when they discouraged bank hall transactions in coins.

    As for the elephantine N5, 000 note, I believe the CBN never made the case why it was such a compelling proposition at this point in time. Countries usually resort to printing such huge bills when hyperinflation has rendered their currencies useless. We’ve seen this happen in the likes of Zimbabwe and Ghana. But surely, inflation in Nigeria is not yet running at 1,000%.

    As has been argued by many, the aborted note would most certainly have exacerbated graft, money laundering etc. Rather than help the CBN’s vision of a cashless society, it would have made it even easier for people to hoard millions under their beds or tote it around.

    The apex bank’s governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, would have us believe that those who opposed his bright idea were either illiterates or voodoo economists.

    He made this point in his now infamous put-down responding to former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s criticism of the controversial note. For suggesting that it will cause inflation and worsen hardship, Sanusi dismissed him as “a very successful farmer, but a very bad economist.”

    Obasanjo was not the only VIP who flayed the big bill. Former Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon and several other high profile figures did. The Senate and House of Representatives were set to ask for Sanusi’s head on a platter if he defied them by going ahead.

    But OBJ’s comment particularly irritated the CBN governor because according to him Obasanjo introduced more high currency denominations in Nigeria than any other head of state.

    Still, for all of Sanusi’s knowledge of economics, I thought his comments were rather impertinent. For one thing, he was dismissing the knowhow of a man who presided over some of Nigeria’s better economic times. Surely, such a person would know a thing or two.

    This whole N5, 000 episode is another useful lesson for the CBN governor. He was convinced that having made his economic argument and sold same to the President and cabinet, the whole country would just fall in line.

    Sanusi forgets that economics is often not black and white, and economists are just like politicians – each one has a different prescription for the same malady. Some of the most vociferous critics of the N5, 000 note are economists of unimpeachable pedigree.

    Now, President Goodluck Jonathan, barely a fortnight after signing off on the proposed note, has executed a 360 degree pirouette by putting Sanusi’s plans on hold – ostensibly to allow more time for public education.

    Opponents of the note are already performing its burial rites. Who can blame them? Back in January the government pulled the plug on the policy of total deregulation of the downstream sector of the oil industry, again, to allow more time for people to be better schooled on the joys of living without subsidised petrol.

    Eight months after, there’s not a single half-hearted tutorial going on. Rather we are staggering around in the morass of a full-blown fuel subsidy payment scandal. That is why it will be quite a surprise if Sanusi ever gets to print his cherished note before his tenure runs out.

    Lesson for the governor: on certain matters economics is not enough. Remember how late President Umaru Yar’Adua stopped Prof. Chukwuma Soludo – another bright economist –from executing his own currency experiment?

    What has stopped the N5, 000 are not economic factors but political ones. Jonathan simply checked the Richter scale of political criticism and decided there was no point making himself even more unpopular. Sanusi may sneer at this, but in real life this is how it works.

    Once upon a time there was another brilliant economist who used to see what the rest of the less-endowed populace could not see. His name was Dr. Kalu Idika Kalu and he served as Finance Minister in President Ibrahim Babangida’s regime. As Nigeria struggled to overcome her economic woes in the mid-80s he pressed for the nation to take an International Monetary Fund (IMF) loan. In the end he was overruled by Babangida in the face of strident national opposition.

    It is good the ghost of the N5, 000 note has been laid to rest: not necessarily because it is bereft of merits. But one magic note, irrespective of its utility, will not pull us out of the economic slump. There are fundamental issues to be addressed if we mean business about turning the economy around. Let’s tackle the basics and put the drama to one side.

  • Jonathan suspends introduction of N5,000 notes

    President Goodluck Jonathan has directed the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to suspend the proposed introduction of the N5,000 notes.

    Dr Reuben Abati, the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, confirmed this to State House correspondents on Thursday night in Abuja.

    “The introduction is being suspended for now to enable the CBN do more enlightenment on the issue.

    “Yes, President Jonathan has directed that the implementation of the new N5,000 note be suspended for now.

    “This is to enable the apex bank to do more in terms of enabling Nigerians to understand why it proposed it in the first place.

    “So, for now, the full implementation is on hold,” he said

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalls that the CBN recently announced that it would introduce the note, and coins to replace the current N5, N10 and N20 notes.

    The policy was endorsed by the National Economic Management Team, an advisory body coordinated by the Minister of Finance, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala.

    NAN, however, recalls that both the Senate and the House of Representatives have passed separate motions calling for the suspension of the introduction of the note. (NAN)

  • Economics of the N5000 debate

    Economics of the N5000 debate

    The statement by the central bank of Nigeria that N5, 000 will be introduced and N5, N10, and N20 notes will be coined in 2013 has generated a lot of debate. Many of the contributions have however strayed off the key point. Namely, the reason currency notes and coins are necessary.

    • Retail Payment Requirements

    Notes and coins are held primarily for retail payments. To be relevant, their face values, nature, sizes and weights must be suited to the retail transactions they are needed for.

    There are two types of retail payments: highly repetitive small value transactions such as urban transportation, sweets, cigarettes, cola nuts, fruits, vegetables, snacks, cooked food, sachet water, soft drinks, juices, beer; newspapers, haircuts; phone cards, and, less frequent, relatively high value transactions such as clothing, footwear, watches, raw foodstuff, poultry, livestock, fuel, spares parts, and local airfares.

     

    Optimising Naira coins

     

    Naira coins must be designed by the central bank with the first category of retail transactions in focus because their repetitive nature and the conditions under which they must happen, such as in crowded markets, stadia, streets, bus stations, airports, congested traffic, and varying weather conditions including rainy, sunny, and humid conditions, mean that notes are ill-suited for them.

    Metal coins will fare better under these conditions, which is why countries regularly upgrade their coinage to keep pace with the prices of this category of retail items.

    Nigeria’s coins were adequate for these transactions when we spent pennies and shillings modeled after the British pound sterling before independence, and a little over a decade after independence.

    Nigerians valued the coins and spent them with relish, because one or two pieces in the pocket sorted the daily payment needs of the average person, child or adult. Naira coins that replaced those in 1973 remained very adequate for all the small value transactions until the late eighties when they began to lose correspondence with retail prices, and Naira notes increasingly took their place.

    Attempts to reform the coinage to date have never spoken directly to the need for the face values of Naira coins to relate such retail items as bus fares, and the prices of newspapers, refreshments and fast food.

    The Soludo coin reform that raised the maximum face value of coins arbitrarily to N2, without asking how much a school child needed for soft drink and snacks at break time, failed for this reason. The Lamido proposal to coin N5, N10, and N20 is in the right direction, but is equally arbitrary, as it lacks correspondence with current values of retail items, and is also bound to fail. How many pieces of the Lamido coins will a school child need to hold just for school run and refreshment at break time? It will require too many pieces to make sense for school children, much less adults.

    A robust coinage must be adequate for retail payment needs of all children and adults. Naira coins that would make sense today will fall in the range of N1, N2, N5, N10, N20, N50, N100, N200, N500, and N1000. Just before anyone screams, remember that the two pound coin is more that N500 in face value, and the coining of the five pound note is imminent in the UK.

    They thought us how to use coins. They have done a good job of maintaining their coinage, it’s about time we put some dignity back into Naira coins. Japanese six denominations of coins range from Y1 to Y500, and one Yen exchanges for two Naira.

    Nobody holds the naira coins today because N2 maximum face value makes absolutely no sense. It is a waste of the country’s resources and time to mint such. N1 and N2 should be the minimum, and small enough, like the farthing of old, and they would make sense. N20 Naira maximum coin still will not make sense because it still does not buy a soft drink or an apple, and no one will hold them.

    If you stamp N500 or N1000 as the maximum value on the same coins today, everyone will hold them, as in other countries where the coinage relate to retail prices.

     

    Optimising Naira Notes

     

    Naira notes must be designed by the central bank with the second category of transactions in mind. If naira notes are to make sense, I should be able to fill my tank with just a piece of Naira note. People should be able to pay for live chicken, goat, or turkey with a piece or two of Naira notes. A bag of rice, a tin of vegetable oil, should not require more than one or two pieces of Naira notes.

    There should be notes with face values suited for the purchase of ram, shirts, suits, shoes, watches, car tyres, and other spares parts if Naira notes are to be worth printing and spending. The proposed introduction of N5000 is in the right direction, but is equally arbitrary, as it is not proposed in reference to retail price realities, and is hardly the optimal highest face value for the Naira notes at the moment.

    It is the end that justifies the means. It is the items that people need to pay for with notes that should determine how much we print on the currency notes. That is the economics of Naira notes denominations. To be sensible today, Naira notes should take face values of N500, N1000, N2000, N5,000, N10,000, and N20,000 (current value of the lowest airfare); where N500 and N1000 could circulate as both notes and coins until further notice.

    I have arrived at these suggestions by trying to connect the face values of Naira notes with realities of retail prices. But the examples of other some other countries also point to the same direction. Japanese notes are only four denominations: Y1000, N2000, N5000, and Y10,000; and one Yen exchanges for two Naira.

    Suggestions by Professor Soludo a few others that the Naira be re-decimalized by knocking of a few zeroes are uncalled for, being more suited to currencies with seven digits or more in face values, as in post hyper-inflation Ghana, Zimbabwe, and a series of Latin American and Eastern European countries. The Japanese example of re-denomination necessitated by realities of retail prices is more appropriate to the current Nigerian challenge.

    Apart from speaking directly to the realities of retail prices, the suggested re-denomination will have the added advantage of reducing the pieces of notes the central bank have to print, store, distribute, and maintain. There were as many as six billion pieces of naira notes in circulation in 2011, compare to one billion pieces in 1985, and four billion pieces in 2005.

    We should introduce larger denomination notes to push that number back to less than two billion pieces. Banks will no longer require as many bullion vans, bulk counting rooms, note counters, counting machines, and those little bags they must now give you when you withdraw some cash. Buyers and sellers will waste less time counting and recounting notes as if under a spell.

    Handing of naira notes by the public will become inconspicuous. Relatively higher face values will ensure they are used less often, treasured and kept neat. People are unlikely to spray reasonably valued notes at parties and other social events.

     

    Electronic Payments

     

    The two categories of retail transactions to which coins and notes have been related above are not what e-payment instruments are about. E-payment instruments are more suited to transfer of funds from one person to the other, especially when bulk sums are involved. E-payments relate to wholesale transactions, as opposed to cash which relate to largely spontaneous, mostly anonymous, small value repetitive transactions.

     

    Misconceptions

     

    In the presence of generally acceptable small-denomination coins, large-denominations will not be inflationary. It is actually the current situation in which lower denomination coins are not in circulation that precipitates inflation as the general public put pressure on retailers to round up to the nearest banknote.

    The currency, note or coin is best viewed as a measuring rod or ruler. There is no reason to expect that the public will wear oversized dresses if the tape-rule is too long. We can press the analogy with the ruler a little further: school children, dressmakers, architects, land surveyors, and civil engineers all use one type or the other of what is basically the same thing, the ruler: multiples of millimetres. The only difference is size.

    Currency is just like that. It must be made available by the issuing authority in wide enough variety or denominations to suit the needs of different users.

    Many economies in which large-denomination notes and coins circulate actually have some of the lowest inflation rates often combined with impressive records of growth. US, Japan, UK and the Euro area are some of the examples. The Euro provides a good illustration: there are 8 denominations of coins, and 7 denominations of notes.

    This will provide enough flexibility and adaptability to both very small and very large transactions. Since there should be small-denominations that are appropriate for any transaction, there is no reason why the presence of large denomination should affect inflation in any way.

    Too many denominations will not be confusing either. The public will choose the denominations they want and others will become unpopular. The range of measurement units from the millimetres to the kilometre is quite broad yet it confuses no one. Rather it helps everyone. The Euro’s eight denominations of coins and seven denominations of notes means there are fifteen different units of currency circulating in the Euro area. Nigeria can take a cue from that.

    The policy clue is that the issuing authority should make a fixed quantity of all the relevant denominations for a start, and subsequently increase each denomination only at the rate at which their inventory is depleted.

    Large-denomination coins are unlikely to be melted by metal-smiths for jewellery if the central bank ensures that coins have very low and  insignificant intrinsic value. What counts is the face value of each coin. It matters very little how much zinc or copper, or silver it contains. Kill the incentive to melt the coins away. That is the message. It is instructive that American public simply throw the 1-cent away or abandon it at home. There is no incentive to melt it down.

    Large-denomination currency notes will not encourage counterfeiting. We should be careful not to throw out the baby with the bath water. Fear of possible counterfeiting should not stop us from doing the needful. We need to do what is necessary first, and take measures to protect it afterwards. The hundred-dollar bill is probably the most widely counterfeited currency bill in the world. Rather than withdraw it from circulation, the US government has simply invested a little more in security proofing.

     

    •Dr. Teriba, who wrote in from Lagos, can be reached at ayo.teriba@econassociates.c