Tag: NASS

  • NASS yet to inform us of Senator’s death-INEC

    Thirty days after his demise, the National Assembly is yet to officially inform the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of the death of Senator Mustapha Bukar who represented Katsina North Daura) as required by the law

    Head of Department, Voter Education of the Katsina state branch of INEC, Alhaji Albani Takai, told our correspondent exclusively that failure of the legislators to perform this statutory function is affecting the electoral umpire’s plan to conduct a bye-election in the senatorial district.

    According to him: ”We are yet to receive official notification from the Senate concerning Senator Bukar’s death and we cannot do anything at the moment until that happens.

    “Statutorily we have 90 days from the death of the Senator and 30 days on the official receipt of his death from the senate to conduct a bye -election.”

    On the current voters registration exercise in the state , he said the exercise has entered the second quarter of 2018 and ongoing with some modifications from mobile residential areas to the rural areas though not involving the polling units.

    Takai further denied allegations of registration of under-aged children, adding there were strict security arrangements to prevent the possibility.

  • Buhari, NASS and unlawful use of $469m ECA funds

    On April 9, President Muhammadu Buhari’s Senior Special Assistant on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Ita Enang, lied to worried and inquisitive Nigerians that the president was yet to authorise the payment of $469m from the Excess Crude Account (ECA) to buy 12 Super Tucano military jets from the United States government. It turned out that as far back as February, despite repeated denials, the president had both approved the said sum and authorised disbursement. It was only the Defence minister, Mansur Dan Ali, who somewhat truthfully hinted early February that the procurement had been done in order to meet the deadline set by the American government for the deal to be consummated.

    It is unlikely that Sen Enang, who is himself very conversant with legislative appropriations process, did not know that the approval had been given and the payment made. Nor is it likely that he does not know the gravity of the executive branch arbitrarily and unilaterally authorising the disbursement of funds not appropriated. The special assistant knew; he only chose to lie. Here is what he said when the public initially suspected that the president had made the unauthorised disbursement of ECA funds: “…That the said sum has not and cannot be approved for spending by Mr. President. That in accordance with best practices, Mr. President, having received approval of the sum from National Economic Council made up of all the governors, now had a meeting with the Minister of Defence, service chiefs and the Inspector-General of Police, among others, to collate the needs of each of the services and the money available for appropriation…As of now, the process of approving the money for use is inchoate and still undergoing executive standard operating procedure before laying same before the National Assembly for appropriation.”

    When Sen Enang told this open lie, members of the National Economic Council (NEC), the president himself, and the vice president already knew that the money had been disbursed. They chose to keep quiet, associated with the lie, and perhaps sought for ways to blunt both public and legislative reactions to the unlawful use of ECA funds. The governors who in December authorised the withdrawal of $1bn from ECA on the grounds that previous governments periodically accessed the account for one reason or the other also knew by experience in their states that the executive arm, in this case the president, could not spend a kobo without appropriations. Instead, they incredibly decided at a meeting headed by the vice president that their collective assent was as good as legislative assent because no one complained when previous governments made similar withdrawals.

    To put the whole matter at rest, and knowing that the infernal lie told by Sen Enang and connived at by the presidency could not be sustained for too long, the president finally wrote to the National Assembly this April to inform them that he had spent the money from ECA, and asked for their understanding. Other than implying that the urgency of the spending necessitated the illegality, the president offered no other substantial or persuasive reason for breaching the constitution. According to him: “I wish to draw the attention of the House of Representatives to the ongoing security emergencies in the country. These challenges were discussed with the state governors and subsequently, at the meeting of the National Economic Council on 14th December, 2017, where a resolution was passed, with the Council approving that up to US$1 billion may be released and utilised from the Excess Crude Account to address the situation… It would be recalled that, for a number of years, Nigeria had been in discussions with the United States Government for the purchase of Super Tucano Aircraft under a direct Government-to-Government arrangement. Recently, approval was finally granted by the United States Government, but with a deadline within which part payment must be made otherwise, the contract would lapse.”

    The president continues: “In the expectation that the National Assembly would have no objection to the purchase of this highly specialised aircraft, which is critical to national security, I granted anticipatory approval for the release of US$496,374,470.00. This was paid directly to the treasury of the United States Government. I am therefore writing, seeking approval of this House for the sum of US$496,374,470.00 (equivalent to N151,394,421,335.00) to be included in the 2018 Appropriation Bill, which the National Assembly is currently finalising. The balance of the requirements for critical operational equipment is still being collated from the different security services and will be presented in the form of a Supplementary Appropriation Bill, in due course.”

    There is no question that the president knowingly and subversively took the money from ECA. But nothing justifies it: no emergency, no urgency, no security situation. There was nothing to suggest that since the governors decided on that course of action last December, the president didn’t have enough time to present a supplementary estimate to be thoroughly scrutinised by the legislature. He missed the point by giving the impression that critics who denounced the executive arm for disbursing ECA funds were unmindful of the country’s security situation, or insensitive to the urgency of making the military purchases. Critics in fact sensibly suggested that though the motive of the purchase was sound, it was nevertheless wrong to eye the ECA fund meant for the three tiers of government, let alone make the disbursement outside due process. For neither the president nor the governors, nor yet the local councils, approximated the legislative assemblies of their various tiers. Moreover, even the seller of the jets, the US, would be privately appalled by the illegitimacy of the process through which the $469m was released. Such flagrant abuse could never be countenanced in the US. It also beggars belief that those who kept the money feigned ignorance of the proper process by which the funds are to be shared constitutionally between the three tiers of government

    It is disturbing that President Buhari, sitting at the head of a government that prides itself on being ethically different from its predecessors and intolerant of past abridgement of financial regulations, could countenance that constitutional affront. By his letter to the legislature, he seems to think that both the urgency of the purchase and the intensity of the insurgency problem justified the spending from ECA. It is even worse that he indicated in his letter that he expected the legislature not to turn down his request, hence his approval of the unlawful ECA spending. This unilateral action is truly shocking. How could he tell the mind of the legislature? Does he not know what the law say very clearly? The truth is that the Buhari presidency and the federal government under him, including the cabinet and security agencies, think very little of the legislature. They think that if the public were forced to choose between the executive arm headed by the ‘saintly’ President Buhari, and the parliament headed, for instance, by the Machiavellian Bukola Saraki, the public would sack the parliament and embrace the executive. This is the classical beginning of fascism.

    It is also strange that with all the lawyers and constitutional experts around the president, he could still subvert the constitution in the manner he has done. This speaks to the lack of cohesion in the government — in such a manner that suggests only a few people carried away by the importance of their offices take decisions for the presidency and present a fait accompli to the rest of the cabinet — or to perhaps the fear of confronting the president and educating him on the dangers of flouting the constitution and diminishing the importance of the parliament, as his government and cabinet have serially done.

    A far more disturbing truth is that, given the arguments and logic of some of the governors rationalising the ECA spending, there are indeed very few democrats presiding over the affairs of their states in this Fourth Republic. The Governor of Jigawa State, Muhammadu Badaru, for instance, simplistically argues: “We forget easily. If you recall, we have been battling with approval from America to buy these equipment in 2014. We have been begging America to sell this equipment to us. We tried Dubai, they could not allow us; we tried a factory in Brazil,  the federal government tried, we couldn’t get it. America still could not sell to Nigeria. Then luckily, President Trump said it was okay to buy. So we had to quickly buy before they change their minds. Because there is also deadline and this is a state to state transaction, no middleman, and we are all here concerned about security and they are raising questions on way and manner you protect people. This is an emergency situation.” The puerility of Mr Badaru’s logic is numbing. No less bewildering is the Ebonyi State governor, Dave Umahi, who sheepishly suggested that critics of the spending as well as the National Assembly  should not just look at the law but the interest of Nigerians. Awful!

    The National Assembly knows that it can only cry itself hoarse over this needless controversy. To impeach President Buhari, even if the divided legislature can be coaxed into unity, will be nigh impossible, not because an impeachable offence has not been committed but because the presidency seems to be counting on the masses who can neither understand the illogic of the ECA spending nor appreciate the role of the parliament in sustaining democracy. Had the people been educated enough to know that it is the parliament that sustains democracy — not the executive, not the judiciary, as important as they are — they would have found a way to force the resignation of the government. But the government is counting on the people’s ignorance to constitute a deterrence to the legislature, or if push comes to shove, join hands with the Buhari presidency in sacking parliament.

    The NASS will have to find a way of saving face on this appalling matter. The cards are stacked against them. Meanwhile they can legislate away the temptations that so easily take the Buhari presidency prey, such as ECA itself. There is no reason for the dedicated. If President Buhari cannot discipline himself and his government to find legitimate and constitutional ways of raising money to execute their agenda, and the governors are either too obtuse or too timid to think straight, and the people will not eschew sentiment in public discourse, it is time for the legislature to anticipate other possible temptations beguiling the presidency and remove them.

  • NASS invitation to Buhari reflects mood of the nation – PDP

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on Thursday hailed the decision of the two chambers of the National Assembly ( NASS ) to invite President Muhammadu Buhari to a joint session over alleged constitutional violations.

    At the planned session, the President will also be required to discuss security issues, particularly the unprovoked killings by herdsmen in Benue, Taraba, Plateau, Adamawa, Nasarawa and other states.

    In a statement issued by its spokesman, Kola Ologbondiyan, the PDP said the decision to invite the President was in consonant with the mood of the nation and the expectations of Nigerians.

    “More so, the vote of no confidence passed on the Service Chiefs by federal lawmakers is a direct indictment of President Buhari, as a failed commander in chief of our armed forces, who must be held responsible for the security failures of our nation in the last three years.

    “President Buhari has roundly failed in his oath of office and allegiance. He has roundly failed to dress his parade as a commander-in-chief in the last three years and must not be allowed to hide behind the Service Chiefs for his failures.

    “Nigerians are very eager to listen to President Buhari and watch him respond to them through their National Assembly members. We therefore harbour no reservations in urging the federal lawmakers, as representatives of the people, not to succumb to any form of executive intimidation, blackmail and pressure to surrender their constitutional powers and duties.

    “Section 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) fully empowers the National Assembly, as the collective voice and conscience of the people, to summon any person, including the President, to give evidence on any matter of state and to apply appropriate sanctions for noncompliance,” the statement said.

    The party urged the President to take questions and address the nation in an open session at the National Assembly, stressing that matters of security were of paramount importance to Nigerians.

    The party added: “Nigerians are eager to know why the Buhari administration is completely insensitive to their plight and why it has refused to take decisive steps to end the ceaseless killing and daily pillaging of citizens by insurgents and marauders.

    “They are also eager to know why President Buhari, particularly, failed to act on intelligence reports and danger signs from flash points, particularly in Benue, Taraba, Yobe, Adamawa, Plateau, Zamfara, Kogi among others; a development that paved the way for the massacre of helpless citizens in these states.

    “Furthermore, Nigerians are anxious to know why it took President Buhari months before he visited the troubled states; allowed his handlers to turn supposed condolence visits into political rallies to further his ill-fated 2019 re-election bid.

    “We commend the courage exhibited by our lawmakers in initiating the constitutional process on the violations of our constitution particularly in the controversial Tucano fighter jets purchase deal and in summoning Mr. President to shed light on his efforts at curbing the endless mindless killings across our nation.

    “Finally, we charge our legislators to note that Nigerians are looking up to them to rescue our nation at this critical time. They must therefore brace up to the imperatives of patriotism and set in motion necessary machinery that will ensure security and cohesion in our country.”

  • Court voids NASS attempt to alter election sequence

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday voided a new provision in the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2018, passed recently by the National Assembly.

    The bill seeks to reverse the 2019 elections sequence earlier announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Justice Ahmed Mohammed held in a judgment that the powers to organise, conduct and fix dates for elections reside only with INEC by virtue of the provisions of the Constitution.

    Justice Mohammed said the passage of the bill, which seeks to alter the election time table earlier released by INEC was a breach of the Constitution and the doctrine of separation of powers.

    The judgement was on the suit filed by Accord Party (AP), challenging the legitimacy of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2018, to which President Muhammadu Buhari declined to assent.

    The judge resolved the only issue he identified for determination in favour of the plaintiff.

    The issue was:

    “Whether the 1st defendant was justified in law in passing the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2018, which Bill sought to reverse the sequence or time table of the 2019 general elections already issued and published by the 3rd defendant.”

    The judge agreed with the plaintiff’s lawyer, Wole Olanipekun (SAN), that it is the sole responsibility of the 3rd defendant to conduct elections into the various offices mentioned above.

    He added that in doing so, the 3rd defendant has the power of determining the sequence of the elections including fixing date for same.

    “I am left with no doubt that, in passing the Electoral Act (amendment) Bill 2018, the 1st defendant was in clear breach of the provision of Paragraph 15(a) of the 3rd Schedule to the 1999 Constitution (As Amended).

    “In this regard, I find comfort in the interpretation of Paragraph 15(a) of the 3rd Schedule to the Constitution given in the case of NDP vs. INEC (supra) to the effect that INEC, the 3rd defendant in this case, has the constitutional responsibility of organising and conducting an election, and to that effect, it can issue time table and it can also decide when election will hold.

    “Now, since the 3rd defendant has already fixed the dates for the 2019 elections, it is the only body that can change the dates.”

  • Breaking: Court voids NASS attempt to alter election sequence

    …Says only INEC can fix dates for elections

     

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has voided Clause 25 of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2018, which seeks to reverse the sequence of the conduct of the 2019 elections earlier announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Justice Ahmed Mohammed, in a judgment on Wednesday, held that the powers to organise, conduct and fix dates for elections resides only with INEC by virtue of Section 15(a) of the 3rd Schedule to the Constitution.

    Justice Mohammed said the passage of the Bill, which seeks to alter the election time table earlier released by INEC was a breach of the Constitution and the doctrine of separation of powers.

    The judgement was on the suit by Accord Party (AP), challenging the legitimacy of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2018, to which President Muhammadu Buhari declined to assent.

    Justice Mohammed answered all the questions raised the suit for determination in favour of the plaintiff and granted all the reliefs by the sought plaintiff, except 11(1) which sought to restrain President Muhammadu Buhari from asserting to the Bill.

    The judge noted that granting such prayer was no longer necessary since the President has already declined signing the Bill.

    Before determining the main suit, the judge earlier dismissed the preliminary objection filed by the National Assembly (1st defendant) in which they argued among others that the suit was not justiciable, that the plaintiff were without the requisite locus standi and that the suit was academic.

    Justice Mohammed disagreed with the 1st defendant on all the grounds raised in the preliminary objection.

    Details later….

    Read Also: Senate writes CJN over alleged frivolous order on election sequence Bill

  • NASS: A social club or representative institution?

    SIR: In furtherance of its impunity and total disregard to the inherent nature of the Senate as a representative institution, the Saraki/Ekweremadu-led 8th senate is reported to have directed the security agencies to deprive the people of Delta Central senatorial district, a voice and involvement in proper and lawful management of Nigerian affairs for which they are eminently entitled and qualified to robustly participate and engage.

    The person of the representative of the Delta Central senatorial district, Ovie Omo-Agege, no matter how seemingly or allegedly odious to the henchmen to the 8th Senate, can never be the basis to shut out the constituents of the district in legitimately participating in the strategic process of law-making and engaging other Nigerians in their views and opinion on Nigerian affairs.

    Any rule of the Senate or any other representative institutions in a democracy, which violates its inherent character damages it and reduces to a mere cult group or a social club.

    There should never be an extant or valid rule in a representative institution to warrant expulsion or suspension of a representative member without any recourse to the primary constituents, on whose behalf the member or delegate acquired his membership. An individual member of a social club or cult group whose membership is basically derived from individual convenience to join, can as well suffer the consequences of such membership as a result of rules and regulations to which he or she willing subscribed and without external interference subsisting, except to the extent to which the rule violates or impinges on the laws of the land or the constitution.

    The serial violations of the representative character of the Senate by the leadership constitute a greater threat to viability of the Senate as a key or core democratic representative institutions than the backlash produced by its impunity.

    The Saraki/Ekweremadu led 8th senate should never be allowed to turn the representative institution of the senate into a cult group, social club or trade union for the protection and promotion of the exclusive interests of their members.

    As for the reported directives of the 8th senate leadership to the security agencies to bar Omo-Agege from actively representing his people, such should be completely disregarded. Barring Omo-Agege from sitting in the senate chamber to represent his people is an open invitation to anarchy.

    If the senate leadership cannot stand to see the face of Omo-Agege, they should make provision for the people of the Delta Central, despite their numbers to effectively represent themselves in the senate chambers, or alternatively encourage them to recall Omo-Agege. Until then, Omo-Agege’s seat in the Senate chamber is sacrosanct and inviolable and no antics of the Saraki/Ekweremadu-led 8th Senate can invalidate it.

     

    • Charles Onunaiju,

    Abuja.

  • Corruption fight: Private investigator seeks cooperation of NASS, Judiciary

    The Special Investigator to the Special Presidential Panel for the Recovery of Public Property,  recently appointed by the federal government to help trace and recover looted funds, Victor Uwajeh, has said that the war on corruption case won by the collaboration of all Nigerians, including the National Assembly and the Judiciary.

    Uwajeh, a London based Nigeria private investigator who was reacting to his appointment assured the government and Nigerians that all the looted funds and property, no matter where they are hidden will be recovered to better the country.

    He sought the cooperation of the National Assembly and the judiciary for the success of anti-corruption fight and to ensure that all looted funds and undeclared property are recovered and return to the government.

    While appreciating the government for giving him the opportunity to serve his fatherland, Uwajeh said “President Buhari relentless efforts have yielded great success in curbing corruption and impunity in Nigeria. It is no longer business as usual. The government has made looting unattractive and the indication is that the rate of acquisition of foreign assets has dropped drastically.

    “I wish to state that we will recover all foreign properties and funds of Politically Exposed Persons, their allies and cronies no matter the jurisdiction. We will trace and return all tax payers funds and ill-gotten properties stolen from the commonwealth of Nigeria.

    “The war on corruption is a collective one. We seek the cooperation of the judiciary and the national assembly in this arduous task. The war against corruption is a tough one, but we are tested professionals that are immune to blackmail and intimidation.”

    While giving assurance of taking the job seriously, Uwajeh commended Barrister Okoi Obono Obla, “for his focus, drive and zeal to recover stolen assets.”

    Read Also: Fed Govt appoints investigator to trace loot

  • NASS passes PIGB, imposes 5% fuel levy

    Nigerians will have to pay more for fuel as the National Assembly on Wednesday passed the much touted Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB) with 5 percent levy on fuel sold across the country.

    According to the lawmakers, the levy will be used to fund the Petroleum Equalisation Fund (PEF) as reflected in the new bill.

    The passage followed the consideration and adoption of the conference committee report on the bill.

    Other sources of financing the PEF, as stated in the bill, include subventions, fees and charges for services rendered as well as net surplus revenue recovered from petroleum products marketing companies.

    The bill empowered the PEF to collect all revenues and levies charged, determine the net surplus revenue recoverable from any oil marketing company and accruing to that company from the sale by it of petroleum products at such uniform prices as may be fixed by the minister and determine the amount of reimbursement due to any oil marketing company for purposes of equalisation of price of products among others.

    It also seeks to provide for the governance and institutional framework for the petroleum industry.

    One of the major highlights of the bill is one seeking to unbundle the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), provide for the establishment of Federal Ministry of Petroleum Incorporated, Nigerian Petroleum Regulatory Commission, Nigerian Petroleum Assets Management Company and National Petroleum Company and Petroleum Equalisation Fund.

    The regulatory bill also seeks to replace the NNPC with the National Petroleum Commission.

     

     

  • NASS shifts 2018 Budget approval to May

    The National Assembly has postponed the approval of this year’s budget till May 2018.

    This is contrary to expectations that the 2018 budget estimates of N8.612 trillion would be passed by April.

    Chairman, House Committee on Appropriations, Mustapha Dawaki, made this known at the 2018 National Budget Hearing in Abuja on Tuesday.

    The hearing was jointly organised by the Senate and House Committees on Appropriation.

    Dawaki, explained that if the budget was not passed by April 24 as assured by the Speaker, House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara, then the N2.06 trillion 2017 capital budget would run till May 31.

    President Muhammadu Buhari had in his presentation of the 2018 appropriation bill to a joint session of the National Assembly on Nov. 7, 2017, called for speedy passage of the budget  to allow for implementation of the January to December budget cycle.

    Both legislative chambers had blamed the delay in the approval of the bill to refusal of heads of ministries, departments and agencies to come forward and  defend their respective budget proposals.(NAN)

  • Court rules on election sequence April 25

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April 25 for judgment in the suit filed by Accord Party (AP) challenging the attempt by the National Assembly to reorder the 2019 general election schedule earlier released by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    Justice Ahmed Mohammed gave the date after entertaining arguments from parties on whether or not the NASS possessed the powers to alter the schedule of election released by INEC.

    While the NASS represented by Joseph Daudu (SAN) urged the court to decline jurisdiction and dismiss the suit, the plaintiff, represented by Wole Olanipekun (SAN), Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami (SAN) and INEC, represented by Femi Falana (SAN), urged the court to grant the plaintiff’s reliefs.