Tag: nation

  • The Nation man wins in SEC’s competition

    The Nation man, Taofik Salako, has emerged winner in the maiden edition of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Capital Market Essay Competition.

    Salako, the newspaper’s Capital Market Editor, emerged second and was handed the competition’s silver award at an event held on Saturday night at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja.

    The award comes with a week’s training at a university in Dubai, the United Arab Emirate (UAE).

    Winners were chosen by a panel of judges comprising distinguished professionals. They included the publisher, Businessday, Frank Aigbogun, Babatunde Ajibade (SAN), Chief Executive Officer, Institute of Capital Market Registrars, David Ogogo, Secretary to the Board of SE, Kennedy Aigbekaen, among others.

    Businessday’s Iheanyi Nwanchukwu came top, winning gold. He is entitled to two weeks training in a South African university. Chris Ugwu of Leadership emerged third, winning the bronze. He will attend a week‘s training at the Pan African University, Lagos.

     

  • Uduaghan: working to save dying nation

    Uduaghan: working to save dying nation

    Death is the end of all mortals. Whenever it chooses to come, it leaves tears and heartache in its trail. Knowing the vulnerability of human beings when it comes to death, Shakespeare wrote: “Woe, destruction, ruin and decay; the worst is death and death will have his day”. For everyman, there is indeed no worst fate than death.

    While it is incontrovertible that every death hurts, it is also true that some kind of deaths really hurt. For instance, when people suffer terminal diseases such as Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), which robs them of everything they have before killing them, friends and relatives wail for days and curse death. It gets worse when the victim was a poor fellow who could not afford the exorbitant cost of treating kidney failure and other related disease in a hospital abroad.

    Although it has always been a challenge, cases of kidney failure are becoming rampant by the day. These days the media is inundated with stories of rich and poor people dying of kidney failure and other related diseases. Be it on television, radio or newspapers, there are countless cases of someone somewhere seeking funds to treat a kidney ailment abroad.

    A recent statics released by the National Association of Nephrology, revealed that at least 32 million Nigerians have chronic renal illnesses which leads to kidney failure. The figure represents more than 20 percent of the entire population of the country. As if that was not enough reason to be afraid, some Medical experts sent a chill into many spines when they disclosed that more people die every day from kidney related diseases than malaria and HIV/AIDS in Nigeria.

    For the average Nigerian, it is not the fact that renal (kidney) failure has assumed the dimension of a killer disease that is frightening. It is the fact that there is no hospital anywhere in the country where it can be treated wholly. Where facilities are available to detect the disease at its infant stage, it is beyond the reach of the poor. Findings revealed that Nigeria has only 75 neurologists and about 50 functional dialysis centres which are all located in urban centres like Lagos, Abuja and Port-Harcourt.

    What this implies is that treatment for kidney failure and other related infirmities is exclusively reserved for the highest bidders. Those who have the wherewithal can either get treatment at any of the fifty dialysis centres or travel abroad while the poor they are condemned to suffer in silence and curse their fate.

    But with the recent intervention of the Delta State Government, led by the amiable Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan, there is a silver lining behind the clouds of hopelessness for people suffering various kidney related diseases.

    Going by the decision of the State Government and the Management of Delta State University Teaching Hospital (DELSUTH) to partner with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center to develop a centre of excellence for kidney transplant, poor patients who cannot afford the high cost of treatment abroad can be hopeful of getting first class treatment within the shores of Nigeria.

    By virtue of the Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) which signed by the Delta State Governor, Emmanuel Uduaghan himself, both institutions would collaborate to build a centre of excellence where kidney transplant and treatment of other kidney related cases can be addressed. To make this dream a reality, the Dialysis Centre, Laboratory, Radiology and Theatre Departments of DELSUTH will be upgraded to become centres of excellence where world-class treatment can be accessed.

    For Dr. Uduaghan, this is memorandum is more just an agreement to equip and upgrade the State’s Teaching Hospital. It is in tandem with his vision to provide quality healthcare for Deltans and other Nigerians. While signing the agreement, the Governor noted that the overall objective was to make the facilities for nephrology and kidney transplant available at a cheaper rate for the people. That means ordinary Nigerian who have been denied treatment because they can’t afford cost of treatment can now get treatment without paying much.

    Knowing how passionate he is about healthcare, Uduaghan’s decision to build in world class kidney centre in Delta State does not come as a surprise. Anyone familiar with happenings there can attest that the state has one of the best healthcare delivery system in the country. It is perhaps the only state in Nigeria where free and quality healthcare is available for senior citizens, pregnant women and nursing mothers.

    At DELSUTH, where the kidney centre will be located, the massive investment on ground there speaks volumes of Uduaghan’s passion and quest to ensure that his people live a healthy life. The investments are yielding visible results as the hospital which commenced full operations about three years ago now ranks amongst the best in the country in terms of facilities and personnel. Earlier this year the hospitals reached a milestone by becoming the first to successfully carry out a knee replacement surgery in Nigeria.

    At a time when cases of kidney failure have become so rampant, Uduaghan’s foresightedness should be commended and embraced by other states and even the Federal Government. If we have first grade Dialysis centers where kidneys can be treated and replaced, Nigerians will not spend their hard earned money that could be used to develop the country travelling abroad for treatment. When we have standard hospitals in various parts of the country, it will not only help Nigerians live a healthy life, it will also boost medical tourism that will help government generate funds that can be used to grow our economy. With quality health care centre like the one Uduaghan is planning to build in Delta, foreigners will also find a reason to throng our hospitals for the treatment. Indeed Uduaghan is working to save Deltans and Nigerian from the scourge of kidney diseases.

    • Eboh writes from Warri, Delta State

     

  • Nation Nov 28th Bomb victims compensation. What about Nigeria’s ‘secret’ billionaires and the $12.5b 1st Gulf Oil Windfall?

    Nation Nov 28th Bomb victims compensation. What about Nigeria’s ‘secret’ billionaires and the $12.5b 1st Gulf Oil Windfall?

    Nation Nov 28th Bomb victims compensation; What about Nigeria’s ‘secret’ billionaires and the $12.5b 1st Gulf Oil Windfall? Tony Marinho Yet another Church bombing. This time in Kaduna at the military base-the safest place in the world, abi? Another 11 Nigerians simply trying to live and worship as they are directed by their Maker are blown up, killed and 30 injured for that very reason. And this in spite of our massed Christian prayers nationwide.

    What is the compensation for bombed families? The N260m Boko Haram reward may backfire and be given to Boko Haram secret members. The 2012 top 10 Nigerians whose combined wealth comes officially to $20b or $20,000,000,000 or N3,060,000,000,000 was recently published by Forbes. By a malicious coincidence the court case demanding to know the whereabouts of the Financial Times documented missing $12,500,000 ‘First Oil Windfall’ during Babangida’s ‘benevolent’ time was again adjourned.

    Does that not tell you something? The Forbes Nigerian billionaires’ money mostly comes from Nigeria, a developing country paradoxically dependent on generators for power, and with nearly the highest maternal and infant mortality, lowest literacy, lowest housing and highest pothole rates in the world. Was Nnaji sacked from the Ministry of Power for doing too good a job at trying to fix the abysmal power problem?

    After all some think that Nigerians do not deserve power 24/7. A lot of this $20b came from Nigerians buying cement, a commodity which has mysteriously increased in price by over 300+% from N600 to over N2,000. Petroleum industry and products made up a lot of the rest, though Nigerians suffer nationwide queues and citizens suffer high fuel prices because the refineries are sabotaged by greed and officials. Some of the $20b is from transporting those same petroleum and other products having ensured that the railways are dead or being so slowly modernised as not to make a difference. Nigeria’s potholed roads groan under the overloaded axle weight of cement, petrol and other goods in unnecessary armada of over 70,000 articulated tankers and trailers too frequently crashing, catching fire, delaying and killing citizens and constantly clogging-up.

    Those are the true cost to Nigerians of the $20b in profit for the few. Some of the $20b is in banking, whatever that is.

    No honest Nigerian can enter any bank and walk out in three months with an overdraft or a short term loan even after depositing DNA, birth certificate and the keys to a grandparents grave in Ikoyi Cemetery, and the exchange rate is N153.5 to the $1, so where is all this banking money coming from?

    Is it magic money only for shareholders? Banks expect congratulations for removing a probably illegal but multi millions naira daily ATM charges which should never have been charged in the first place. But bankers have left an equally questionable COT charge. Communications, yes we can see and pay the exorbitant fees, are hoodwinked by the phone-in, vote for so-and-so, bonanzas and promo scams. Such money comes out of the pockets of the gullible faster than the customer can earn it or ask ‘who is speaking’.

    Nigerians should realise there is nothing like ‘Free air time’ unless someone can give you airtime while your money remains in your pocket and can be found in your pocket next morning. And when you check it is never there but in the pockets of the Forbes List of African Nigerian billionaires. Some people have certainly made ‘free billions’ from us mumus etc enjoying ‘’free” midnight chats.

    Cumulatively are hands and dealing of the billionaires clean? There is blood on the roads, in the hospitals, in the schools, in the Niger Delta oil polluted lands and from the bombs of Boko Haram. This blood cannot be washed away with petty donations to victims of water, flood, and other disasters. The citizens should not be over-grateful to the billionaire donors as the money came from the citizens in the first place.

    It does not matter if the whole list of top money men and women are Nigerians in the Forbes Africa Rich List. Nigeria will still be poor until the price of cement comes down, banks reduce interest rates and make loans available, the naira appreciates against the dollar, the communications watchdog extends its ban on promos and bonanzas and reduces tariffs. In a country with 70% living on less than a $1/day, is it a good boast that you are a $ billionaire?

    What is the point of a corporate body ‘boasting’ of giving away a plane costing N48m or N68m when the funds come, not from the company, but from poor gullible Nigerians seeking ‘instant millionairism’. The Nigerian customer is the loser. Nigeria probably has 50 secret billionaires but do they translate to communal wealth or national financial health?

    No, it is all selfish wealth, greed wealth and some of it is cheating wealth? There is a saying that behind ‘every billionaire are a million bad secrets’ and ‘every fortune is a misfortune for others’. Making billions from exploitative cement prices or exploitative banking or computer prices and giving N700,000,000 back to flood or AIDS victims is not charity or the answer. Reduce the price of cement and computers to the masses, reduce the cost of loans, reduce the cost of fuel, increase the naira value and reduce the cost of living. The grave has no space for even $1. Bill Gates seems to know this now. Forbes Africa and the secret billionaires, can sit on the side lines and watch Nigeria die.

  • State-of-the-nation

    State-of-the-nation

    •We welcome eminent Nigerians’ intervention

    Fifty prominent leaders from the South and North of Nigeria met at the Yar’Adua Centre, Abuja, on November 21, to ruminate over the state-of-the-nation. The leaders, under the aegis of ‘Project Nigeria’ had Prof Ben Nwabueze as chairman. The organisation, which promised to meet with President Goodluck Jonathan and the leadership of the National Assembly, sees itself as a platform to canvass good governance and establish unity among the different interests in the country. In pursuit of its agenda, it set up a committee headed by a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Mallam Adamu Ciroma.

    A source who attended the meeting revealed that the project became imperative because “the country is fast declining; we must save the country from collapse. We must close ranks and ensure that things are done properly”. But this was not the end of the story, as investigations showed that many of the participants at the meeting were skeptical about the ongoing constitution review, arguing that it would be a fruitless exercise. However, the meeting resolved, in line with the feeling of many Nigerians, that there was need for a national conference to solve most of Nigeria’s problems.

    To say that the nation has undergone a serious decline is an understatement. Over the years, corruption and indiscipline have been on the rise at all levels. The Boko Haram is one of the negative dividends of poor or lack of education, general unemployment and poverty in a country that is the sixth largest producer of oil whose citizens, therefore, have no reason to be poor. The general poverty in the country is caused by greedy and selfish misappropriation of the nation’s wealth by a few people. This has raised concerns, just as the current rising frustration in the land and the high inflation rate that has sent the prices of goods and products skyrocketing. The high level of poverty and the big gap between the leaders and those they are supposed to govern and care for remain worrisome and capable of leading to violent revolution against the elite.

    Perhaps one of the most serious problems confronting the country today is insecurity. Sporadic bombings of churches and public places by Boko Haram, kidnappings, armed robberies, ritual killings for money- making and other purposes, etc. have become the order of the day. The situation in the country is that even the future is uncertain. In short, life has become ‘nasty, brutish and short’.

    In these circumstances, we expect every patriotic Nigerian to be concerned and to proffer solutions to the challenges. We, therefore, thank the eminent Nigerians involved in ‘Project Nigeria’ for their concern about the state-of-the-nation. We hasten to add, however, that our politicians must be ready to put national interests above parochial ones, especially among the elite in the different geo-political zones.

    But the problems can never be solved just by a review of the constitution as the National Assembly posits, because previous reviews have never solved the country’s problems. The 1999 Constitution is particularly defective in that it was handed to us by soldiers who were forced, more or less, to leave the political scene; it is not a product of any democratic process properly so-called. Even constitutions put together by egg-heads are subjected to periodic reviews.

    This is why it is gratifying that the eminent citizens involved in the ‘Project Nigeria’ themselves acknowledged that we need a national conference to thrash out the issues. We are disgusted with successive governments’ stance on this matter because they are not helping the situation. It is high time we went beyond the usual panel beating and patch-ups that have only scratched our social, economic, political, educational and religious problems in the surface without touching the fundamentals. We need to talk.

  • When did we become a nation of such unhappy people?(1)

    Recently, the results of the ranking of the happiest countries in the world, was released. According to a new global happiness measurement, the Happy Planet Index (HPI), Costa Rica (in Central America), has become the happiest country in the world. The criteria used were namely life expectancy, experienced well-being and ecological footprint.

    With this new ranking, Nigeria has lost her prime position as the happiest country in the world. It was an unsolicited title bestowed on us about seven years ago by another happiness index group. Back then, the news was received with mixed reactions by many citizens. Some, seeing the dire situation in the country then, disagreed with the ranking, wondering the criteria used in judging us so highly in the happiness stakes.

    “How can we be the happiest people in the world with so much poverty, disease, hunger, unemployment and other indices of underdevelopment confronting us?” they wondered. Others, however, incurable optimists supported the ranking, buttressing their stand with this argument:

    “Agreed we have all these problems, but you still see people looking happy and smiling everywhere you turn even in the midst of all these problems. What does that tell you? That we are a happy people!”

    Between that time and today, a lot has happened and our happiness rating has fallen drastically. We are now number 135 in a ranking of 151 countries in the happiness index (with

    Botswana at the bottom of the table as the saddest country in the world).

    What could have happened to make us fall so low, from being the happiest to become one of the saddest countries in the world? Too much, I believe. And more is happening daily to wipe the smiles off our collective faces.

    The causes of misery in the land are obvious and some have been cited above. But above all these, is the death of hope. And optimism.

    Even in the midst of so much poverty, what kept most people, living truly miserable lives, going was the belief, the hope that there is a greater tomorrow- ‘e go better’ as we like to say in local parlance. That is the spirit that moves the market woman sitting under the scorching sun all day selling wares with a street value of less than a N1000, the teenage street hawker risking his young life dashing through the traffic to sell a few bags of ‘pure water’, the danfo driver who leaves home by 4 am to take commuters to their places of work, the unemployed graduate who left school when Abacha was still in power and has not worked for a single day but is praying and hoping that a good job, perhaps in an oil company will materialize soon…the list is endless.

    It’s this Nigerian spirit, a never say die one, that baffles foreigners who can’t understand why we seem to be so happy despite all the ills in our society. What they fail to grasp is our love of life. The average Nigerian will hang on to life no matter how wretched his condition is. That perhaps explains why we have such a low suicide rate compared to other countries, even more affluent societies with higher standards of living. It must take something really terrible for a Nigerian to take his own life. This is unlike in a country like Japan for instance when a man can jump off a bridge to his death just because he feels his name, image and reputation have been affected by a scandal or allegation.

    Not so in this country where some one will be caught stealing billions from the public treasury but will feel no sense of shame. Instead, when taken to court, even with his battered reputation, he will be seen smiling, in hand cuffs and waving to his supporters who are often dressed in aso-ebi, singing and dancing as if in a street carnival.

    Anyway, as I was saying, it’s our zest for life, a belief in a better future that made us rank very highly in the happiness scale in the past. But in the past couple of years, the tables have turned and something seems to have happened to our indomitable spirit…

     

    To be continued

  • Mark, Chukwumerije disagree over state of the nation

    Mark, Chukwumerije disagree over state of the nation

    Senate President David Mark yesterday disagreed with Senator Uche Chukwumerije over the latter’s declaration that Nigeria is a failed state.

    Mark noted that contrary to Chukwumerije’s claim, the country has a lot of things to be proud of.

    Chukwumerije, in his contribution to a motion entitled: “Congratulations to Nigeria and Nigerians on her 52nd Independence Anniversary” described Nigeria as either a failed state or on the verge of failure.

    The motion was sponsored by Senator Ita Enang (Akwa Ibom North East) and 108 others.

    Enang said the Senate should note that on Monday, October 1, Nigeria marked her 52nd Independence Day anniversary, having attained freedom from Britain on October 1, 1960.

    He said that “steadily and gradually, the nation is developing its domestic production capacity as an independent nation.

    Enang said the country has become a big player in international affairs within the comity of nations.

    He urged the Senate to congratulate President Goodluck Jonathan and the people on the nation’s 52nd Independence Day anniversary.

    Chwukwumerije said: “I want to draw attention to the scanty way the mover of the motion summarised the achievements of the nation before moving on to congratulations.

    “That scanty way in itself says a lot.

    “In three dry sentences, he summarised what he saw as Nigeria ’s achievements. In saying that, I want to draw attention to what we can say in a more blunt way.

    “Before putting it in a more blunt way, let me first refer to the very first speaker here, Senator Abaribe (Enyinnaya), who used the analogy of a human being who is 52 years old and gave the impression of someone that has gone beyond even maturity.

    “But I think he is being very generous to Nigeria . To make my point on this, I want to draw the attention of my colleagues to a general view of international affairs.

    “In Turkey , it took Gen. Atatuk 21 years to transform Turkey from a feudal state to highly modernised state that has remained till today.

    “South-East Asia countries, it took them 30 years to move from undeveloped ex-British colonies to what they are today, Asian Tigers.

    “One of them took our own palm produce and turned it into an export market.

    “It took South Korea 18 years to move from a very dependent country to one of the world’s top today.

    “It took China exactly 48 years to move from a slum status derided by the West as the begging bowl of Asia to a super power.

    “Taking the development of this country into consideration for the last 52 years, you will come to understand why I said the first speaker was being very generous when he compared us with a 52 year old human being.

    “If a country that took ordinary palm nuts from us some years back has turned it into its main export product, how will you describe the country from which it was taken that is today importing all those things.

    “I can only describe that country in one word: that Nigeria is either a failed state or on the verge of being a failed state.

    “You will agree with me that a country that cannot meet the basic expectations of her people has failed in every way in meeting the basis of a social contract.

    “So, we must start therefore by accepting that objective reality that as of today Nigeria is a failed state or nearly a failed state.

    But Mark disagreed with Chukwumerije.

    He noted that rather than describe the country as a failed state, Nigerians should congratulate themselves for still being one united nation “that one alone is an achievement.”

    He said: “There is no gain saying that we are not where we would love to be, certainly, we are not there but that is not to say that we have not made progress at all.

    “We have made some considerable achievement and for that, we need to show gratitude to God.

    “We need to pray and work, not just pray, prayer alone will not solve the problem we need to combine both of them.

    “Unless we are determined to politically pursue the decision we have taken that are of benefit to this country, we will still be where we are in another 20, 30 years because the political will is lacking in so many areas.

    “We have challenges, there is no doubt about that, but I believe that with political will, we will meet those challenges.

    “It is at every level. Most times, when we are going on the road and there is traffic, people will drive by the foot path, is that a failure of leadership?

    “Every Nigerian has something to do. When people do the wrong thing and they are not caught and dealt with according to the law, they continue to do it.

    “At every level, we must know that we have leadership role to play.

    “When things begin to go wrong, we must have the courage to speak out before it gets too far.”

    Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu joined other senators in congratulating Nigeria on her independence.

    He said, “ Nigeria at 52 is relatively a young country. I don’t think that hope is lost.

    “There is hope for us as a nation. All we need do is to be patriotic and nationalistic.

    “We can do it if we can shun greed and corruption.

    Senator Abaribe said at 52, Nigerians should be grateful to God.

    He said: “When we continue talking about our problems, Nigerians are tired of hearing that.

    “We should focus more on the solutions.

     

  • A nation under water

    A nation under water

    It was perhaps just as well that the Federal Government declared several weeks ago that Nigeria’s 52nd independence anniversary would be observed, again, on a “low key.”

    Nigeria is celebrating its National Day literally under water. “Low key” doesn’t get lower than that.

    Those of a decidedly malignant disposition, whom we shall always have among us, may even see the whole thing – the encircling waters and the objects drifting listlessly in the deluge – as an apt metaphor for the national condition.

    From the parched Sahel in the grip of the furiously retreating Sahara desert to the mangrove swamps of the Atlantic, a vast swathe of Nigeria is under water. Swollen by record rainfall and by water said to have been released from dams in neighbouring Cameroun to avoid a looming disaster, Nigeria’s major rivers, the Niger and the Benue, rage as never before, swallowing up houses and washing away bridges and roads and farmlands, sparing nothing in their ravenous wake.

    For four days, the national capital was cut off from traffic from much of the South, portions of the road linking Lokoja with Abuja having been washed away. Lokoja itself, like many other cities caught up in the floods, evoked scenes of New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, which our own Poet Laureate Niyi Osundare has memorialised for the ages in epic verse.

    Some 130 persons, most likely a gross undercount, have been reported killed in the floods. At least as many are missing. The number of displaced persons has to be in the millions, and damage to private property must be reckoned in trillions of Naira.

    Given just the dilatoriness, the studied evasion with which Nigerian insurance companies typically handle claims, those who lost their homes and property to the flood cannot rest easy that help is forthcoming. And here I am talking of those who took the trouble and expense to buy insurance cover, or were corralled to do so by a mortgage institution.

    Most of the victims probably do not fall in this category and are entirely on their own. With the sluggish economy and rising cost of everything, and the predilection of the mercantile class for profiting from the misfortunes of others, a good many of them are not going to be in a position any time soon to repair or rebuild their homes.

    The fortunate among the millions of displaced persons will be housed in camps for months if not years, and the rest will have to fend for themselves as best they can

    The National Assembly has not met in emergency session to deliberate on legislative measures to cope with what is without question the greatest natural disaster to have struck Nigeria in recent memory.

    Perhaps its members are waiting for President Goodluck Jonathan to propose a supplementary budget. But what stops a private member from proposing an appropriate bill and shepherding it through the legislature in readiness for the President for assent?

    As for Dr Jonathan, he was half a world away, in New York, addressing the United Nations General Assembly and trying once again to charm those elusive foreign investors into coming to Nigeria to seek their fortunes as the flood waters rose steadily, turned entire cities into flotillas, and cut off Abuja from the south-western part of the country.

    The churlish would say that he should not have travelled out at all, or should have headed back as soon as he was made aware of the enormousness of the unfolding catastrophe. But it may well be that his aides never told him how dire the situation had become so as not to distract him from making the most of a moment on the world’s stage that comes only once a year.

    Besides, the vice president, cabinet ministers and officials Specialised agencies and a sprawling were on hand to deal with any emergencies. And, to his great credit, Dr Jonathan took time off his hectic schedule in New York to direct the designated ministers and officials to take charge. If they did not rise up to the occasion, it cannot be the President’s fault.

    But, wearing another hat, the President is also griever and consoler-in-chief; he sets the mood of the nation in times of rejoicing as well as in times of calamity. It would have been a gesture of enormous significance if, on his return from the United States, he had visited some of the beleaguered communities offering words of sympathy and assuring them that his Administration would do all its power to bring them succour.

    In politics, perception is almost everything. Dr Jonathan needed to be perceived as a President who cared, who feels their pain, and is firmly resolved to translate his concern into practical relief measures. Such a gesture could have bridged somewhat the widening gulf between the general public and his Administration.

    In this respect, time is still on his side, even if not on the side of the beleaguered, who will no doubt see it as a fresh disappointment that their privations rated just four perfunctory sentences in his National Day broadcast.

    It will no doubt be remarked that it was foreign contractors who made the national capital accessible by road from the South-west some four days after a stretch of the Lokoja-Abuja highway was washed away by flood waters.

    And it will be asked: Where were the indigenous contractors? Where, for that matter, were all the hardware that the government relief agencies ought to have stockpiled all these years – rescue vehicles and river craft especially. Where are the mobile emergency health centres? Where are the emergency water-treatment plants? Where was the emergency communication system?

    It will be asked even more insistently: Why was there so little preparation for a disaster so clearly foretold?

    Meanwhile, the Jonathan Administration will have to shed its preoccupation with fringe issues and devote all its energies to coping with this unfolding tragedy. The Weather Bureau says the worst may still lie ahead. This means designing comprehensive measures to deal with the present emergency and proactive measures to contain the coming one.

    I am thinking of food and shelter for the displaced; of schooling arrangements for children, and of their general safety.

    I am thinking of the vast farmlands now under water, and the harvest now lost, and the livestock that perished; the food shortage that is sure to follow, and the high prices everyone will have to pay for a piece of whatever is available.

    At a time like this, the usual posturing will simply not do. It will have to yield to fast-paced, coordinated and sustained action designed to bring relief urgently to communities of the beleaguered across the nation.

  • Tragedy of a groping nation

    Tragedy of a groping nation

    THERE is probably something about the foundation of Nigeria that continues to haunt its march to maturity. Prior to the October 1,1960 lowering of the Union Jack, the symbol of subjugation to British suzerainty, controversy had marked the process all the way. First was the dispute over who moved the motion for the nation’s attainment of freedom. It is popularly credited to the late Chief Anthony Enahoro who, in 1953, moved the historic motion in the House of Representatives. He proposed that the country should become self-governing by 1956. However, some scholars and historians have queried the credit since Enahoro’s motion was just to bring self government, not full independence. Besides, even when no one could question the historic import of the proposal within the context of 1953, it was not carried and thus failed to usher in independence.

    Then came the Remi Fani-Kayode motion in 1957. The son of that legendary figure, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, has of recent made strident efforts to call attention to the fact that his father’s motion succeeded and eventually led to the 1960 independence.

    But then, there was a third. In May 1960, the man who later became the Prime Minister, Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa-Belewa, formally moved that the British transfer power to Nigerian leaders. That came after series of constitutional conferences and an agreement by leaders of the political parties and regions. It heralded the activities of October 1, that year.

     

    The First Republic

     

    Only the deep and discerning could have perceived from the wording of the first national anthem that there was fire on the mountain. Nigeria we hail thee, the anthem said and went on to acknowledge that it is our dear native land. But the next line suggested that it is a land of disparate people who may not easily become a nation by the mere lowering of the British flag. It announced, “though tribe and tongue may differ…” It was an indication that there could be trouble going forward and it did not take long before the differences manifested and led to tension in the system.

    Within two years, the sore had turned to cancer. Two major political parties had drawn the battle line. The Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) that controlled the Northern region and in power at the centre, decided to finish off the Action Group (AG), led by the methodical Chief Obafemi Awolowo. The instruments of state came in handy as weapons for the ruling party. A crisis was provoked in the AG and Awolowo, the Leader of Opposition in the federal Parliament, had to battle for his political life. Challenged by the Premier of the western region, Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola who was also his deputy, Awolowo’s administrative acumen was put to test. Akintola, backed by the NPC, was at the same time hauled before the Coker Commission of Inquiry and sent to the Justice George Shodeinde Sowemimo court to answer charges of treasonable felony.

    The more Awolowo was buffeted by the NPC-NNDP alliance, the more the Nigerian state tottered and the deep knew that it was a question of time before the boat capsized. The eventual jailing of Awolowo, census of 1963, federal election of 1964 and Western parliamentary crisis of 1965 exposed the immaturity of the political class and their utter lack of grace. It was no surprise when the military seized the occasion on January 15, 1966 to take over power.

    For 13 years, an unprepared and ill-trained military, lacking in the necessary experience, sought to tend the political machine. Again, the result was predictable. One counter coup, one other successful coup d’etat, a failed putsch, a civil war, another failed census and one riveting purge of the public service took the toll on the health of the country. By October 1, 1979 when the military rolled back the tanks to the barracks, the tremors had weakened the foundation of the country.

     

    Shagari’s Second Republic

     

    Alhaji Aliyu Usman Shehu Shagari was a man of modest ambition. He had looked forward to being a Senator in the Second Republic, but was persuaded by the lords of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) to try his hands at managing affairs as the Chief Executive and first Executive President. He contested against five more qualified Nigerians who were, however, made to fail the electoral test to pave the way for the man from Shagari village. The reluctant President could not manage the affairs of a troubled country. It took only 27 months for the experiment to fail.

    Once again, the civilians kissed the dust as the military made a show of power with Gen. Buhari, then a barefaced dictator assuming control of the reins of power on December 31, 1983.

    A palace coup in August 1985 brought Buhari’s Chief of Army Staff, an ever-smiling General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida who later accepted that he was an “evil genius”, to power as he toyed with the fate of the distressed country. Thrice, he altered plans to transfer power to elected leaders and reneged. Eventually, when he held a presidential election, he fell to his own antics as resistance to his game led to his unceremonious exit from power on August 26, 1993. A selected Chief Ernest Shonekan was served power ala carte and pretended to be the Head of an Interim Government until a more determined and invidious General Sani Abacha shoved him aside on November 17. Abacha continued the broken military service and was succeeded on death by General Abdulsalami Abubakar in June 1998. In nine months, General Abdulsalami was out of the scene, leaving a constitution that was more of a labyrinth.

     

    The Fourth Republic

     

    There is a Third Republic, but was there a Third Republic? This remains a puzzle. Could there have been a republic without a constitution and an elected leadership at the centre? Another question. On May 29, 1999, the military handed over to a former military Head of State, General Olusegun Obasanjo, as the new President.

    In 13 years, election has become the mode of recruiting leaders, but democracy is yet to take roots. Three Presidents have been elected. First to take power was Obasanjo who remained in power for eight years. He started as a reluctant leader and was forced to yield place to Alhaji Umaru Yar’Adua on May 29, 2007. Yar ‘Adua died prematurely to grant opportunity to the first President of Southsouth descent, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan.

    The history of the Fourth Republic is pot-marked by crises. A major constitutional crisis first ensued with the power game nearly consuming Vice President Atiku Abubakar who chose to enlist the support of the courts to save his career. He won, but the President continued to subjugate the Office of the Vice President. In the National Assembly, the banana peel led to a flurry of activities that led to the fall of a succession of Senate President. From Evans Enwerem to Chuba Okadigbo and Anyim Pius Anyim, three presiding officers graced the leader’s seat in the upper legislative chamber at the centre. The instability was certainly not good for lawmaking.

    Adolphous Wabara started the journey in 2003, but soon lost control and was replaced by a more popular Ken Nnamani who held sway in the second stanza of the Obasanjo tenure because he had learnt lessons from his predecessors, but he had an overbearing and unfriendly President to contend with.

    The House of Representatives had been more relatively stable. Except for the sudden change of Salisu Buhari, who was found to have forged the certificates by which he was elected, the presiding officers had little trouble holding on. Whereas Obasanjo took exception to the Ghali Na’Aba administration, he could not effect a removal. Between 2003 and 2007, it was the turn of Aminu Masari who had a chummy relationship with the President. The post-Obasanjo years, however, saw Patricia Etteh imposed by the departing President. She lasted only five months before falling out of power, and was replaced by Dimeji Bankole. The current Speaker, Aminu Tambuwal has continually been threatened with removal by an unimpressed executive since the preferred candidate of the presidency and ruling party fell to popular forces that installed Tambuwal.

    Could anyone have forgotten the crisis that attended the illness, power tussle and death of Umaru Yar’Adua? What about the strife in the PDP?

    There is danger ahead. What would happen in the run-up to 2015? What would happen if President Jonathan decides to seek another term? Is he constitutionally empowered to do so in view of the constitutional provision that anyone who has been elected twice is barred from contesting? Having been sworn in twice, what is the position of the law? More importantly, would the North accept another spell of being kept out of the powerful seat? What would become of the attempt to alter the structure of the country to cede more powers to the federating units? What is the place of the local governments as the tier of government closer to the people?

    The future is as cloudy as the past. The overriding question is, has the political class learnt enough lessons to keep the military at bay, promote a healthier polity and mobilise support for the quest for development?

    Failed or failing, whither Nigeria? The task of keeping Nigeria out of the list of failed African states is for all. It is beyond leaders and politicians who have proved that they are only good at sharing a shrinking cake.