Tag: National confab

  • National confab report: Uzodimma faults Adamu on northern senators’ stand

    The claim by the Chairman of the Northern Senators Forum, Sen. Abudulahi Adamu that it was wrong for their Southern counterparts to demand that President Mohammadu Buhari should implement the report of the 2014 National Conference has been faulted.

    In reply to the communiqué by the Southern Senators at their retreat in Calabar last month, which among other things asked President Buhari to convene a meeting of stakeholders on the conference report, Senator Adamu had declared that the demand was “a fallacy and borne out of ignorance”, wondering how the President should be expected to implement the report of a conference he was not part of.

    In a statement at the weekend in Abuja, Chairman of the Southern Senators Forum, Sen. Hope Uzodumma dismissed. Adamu’s claims as unfounded and “a product of thorough confusion and crass ignorance of the issues at stake”.

    He said Adamu’s actions and utterance smack of that of a town Union President who out of unnecessary zealotry to protect his union sees the President as a member of his union embarks on an indecent haste to speak for the President all in the name of protecting his town Union.

    Uzodimma argued that if his Northern colleague had taken time to study the communiqué he would have realised that it was drawn from the position papers submitted by eminent people from all over the country, including the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Governor of Jigawa State and Bishop Matthew Kukah of Sokoto Catholic Diocese.

    He said that the communiqué  merely asked President Buhari to convene a meeting of Governors and the leadership of the National and State Assembles to consider the report and forward to the National Assembly for debate. He wondered why Adamu should be in a hurry to defend a President who has not complained about the communiqué.

    Uzodimma asked, “has Adamu forgotten that the President’s party and his party too, the APC, promised restructuring in their manifesto. He recalled that even Adamu admitted that the 2014 conference report treated restructuring extensively and asked, “What is wrong in asking the President whose party promised restructuring to consider sending a restructuring report to the National Assembly?”

    He said that Southern Senators met in Calabar on a well planned retreat on how to deepen National Unity through devolution of powers, and their resolutions should not be dismissed so lightly.

  • 2014 National confab was a job for the boys, says SGF

    2014 National confab was a job for the boys, says SGF

    The Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir David Lawal, has declared that the 2014 National Conference midwifed by ex-President Goodluck Jonathan was merely a job for the boys. Lawal, who was a former National Vice-Chairman, Northeast of the All Progressives Congress (APC), also said the the 2016 Appropriation Act will be prioritised during its implementation. He spoke on anti corruption fight of the administration, board appointments and other issues. The Adamawa State born Engineer granted interview to selected journalists in Abuja. Augustine Ehikioya was there. Excerpt:

    Where are we as regards the 2016 budget?

     

    Well, you know that our concept of budgeting is zero-budgeting where we only appropriate money for key projects that the government considers important for implementation of its key policies. To that effect, the Ministry of Budget and Planning has sent out memos for MDAs to submit their request for capital releases and they have all complied. The Budget Office has started releasing the capital projects releases according to the priorities of government. This is because the revenue of government has fallen by about 47 percent since the budget was approved by the National Assembly. Budget is a statement of intention, the implementation is based on the reality of your revenue as the days go by, and because of that MDAs are required to write and request for funds only for those projects appropriated by the National Assembly and secondly, that are of importance, as a priority. Obviously, quite some projects that are in the budget might not be a priority for the MDAs. As you are aware, during the budget process, we had this issue of padding in which the Executive discovered that the National Assembly included certain projects in the budget and appropriated for them, even when they did not originate from the Executive arm. So, obviously, such projects will not be considered a priority for the executive arm of government if at all they manage to sneak through the vetting process jointly carried out by the Executive and the National Assembly which eventually produced the budget. Now, even those that have been appropriated for, in the light of the dwindling revenue of government would still need to be re-prioritised. For example, the government might find it very difficult to implement the constituency projects to the letter because MDAs might not find constituency projects as critical to the execution of their mandates and given the dwindling resources, these could be some of the areas that would suffer during implementation. If the revenue of the government improves, of course, all capital projects would be fully implemented, but we do not see that happening soon. So, while the government is willing to do that, it is obvious that you can only implement that for which you have money, and I think, to my mind, these are some of the areas that might suffer non-implementation in the budget.

     

    The Senate has summoned you in connection with the recently-unveiled list of ambassadorial nominees. What is the issue?

     

    One thing, however, is clear – the constitution makes it clear that it is the president’s prerogative to nominate ambassadors, and the criteria he would use to do so is also the constitutional right of the president. Whatever criteria he chooses to use is constitutional. Be that as it may, I must say that we are disappointed that the National Assembly took the decision that it did, but again we believe that the Senate we know is made up of very responsible and patriotic Nigerians, there are some past governors who have governed and known the constitutional provisions regarding separation of powers. We know the Senate would not do anything that will bring the country into disrepute because right now Nigeria enjoys tremendous goodwill all over the globe. It is important to have ambassadors therefore to sustain this goodwill. Again, a lot of the travels by the president and government representatives is to attract foreign direct investment into the country and ambassadors are key to sustaining this and ensuring that the goals are achieved. The third reason why we think ambassadors are key is because of the phenomenon of global terrorism. Almost every nation around the world is facing it, and all nations are now collaborating with each other to fight this international terrorism. It is important that Nigerians have representatives on the ground who would present its interest and defend it. Delaying the screening of ambassadors even by one day is inimical to the country, and we believe, senators, being patriotic Nigerians would not want to cause undue hardship and put Nigeria at an undue advantage in any regard.  We expect that in coming to a decision on this, they will take into consideration the interest of their own country and not political or even personal considerations. Of course, we read in the newspapers some of their concerns such as federal character and so on. At the last count, my recollection is that out of the 47 diplomats-nominee, 32 out of 36 states and the FCT were represented. Now, while the constitution preaches federal character, it does not always say that every state must be represented in every appointment except of course, in the case of ministers where the constitution said there should be a minister from every state, and not in all other appointments. So, the spirit of the constitution has been fully satisfied by having ambassadors from 32 states out of 36 plus one. I believe every objective analyst would agree with this. Secondly, there has to be merit and qualifications in every nomination. Now, one of the criteria, I understand that was used was that it is important not to appoint someone that would soon retire. If you know the processes of nominating and deploying ambassadors, you would understand that it is highly unlikely that the Senate would be done with it within the next two or three weeks. They would need to be presented to their countries of deployment for checks and confirmation by those countries, and we cannot dictate the speed, so it could take, in all honesty, probably six to seven months for an ambassador to be fully cleared and assume his new post. It would take longer still for him to acclimatize and settle down in his work. There has been a subsisting policy, not by this regime alone, that it would be good if someone, for example, has 30 months to retire, he should not be posted. He would just be settling down before retiring, and so it does not make sense. A lot of countries have complained about this. You send an ambassador, and after one and half year he retires. So, one of the criteria was that the person must have not less than 30 months to retirement. Again, another criterion that was considered was your seniority level. You must be someone on GL16/17. Now, due to no fault of this government, not all states have people in the Foreign Service Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. About four states did not make it, however, not necessarily on the criteria of seniority. There are other qualifications that are required to post you to go and represent Nigeria. Again, there are specialist areas for which only specialists are required. There is also the requirement of gender sensitivity. This government in its APC manifesto promises gender equality, this is another that was used to the extent that we have about 12 women in the list of 47, among other criteria.

    Again, it is solely the president’s prerogative to determine the criteria to use to appoint an ambassador while we acknowledge also that it is also the prerogative of the Senate to approve or not to approve that nomination. So obviously for all the criteria set up for this nomination, quite a number of states did not make it. Four state did not make it but basically if any state does not have anybody among the list of 47, it is because one way or the other they did not meet the criteria including the criteria of qualification; qualification in the sense that all said and done you must have the character, the integrity and the experience to represent Nigeria even if you meet all the criteria. You must be change compatible, that is you must have the integrity, you must have the experience, you must really just have the qualifications that are required of a representative of Nigeria. These are only career diplomats fully drawn from the civil service, they are not political ambassadors, you must also understand that being posted out as an ambassador is not promotion, if you are level 16 officer and you are posted out as an ambassador, it doesn’t mean you become level 17. When you finish your duty tour subject to your other requirement of upward mobility in the service, you come back to where you left unless while in the service, you have earned yourself a promotion. So it is not right to think that just because one is appointed an ambassador or because a level 17 is appointed an ambassador because he met the criteria while a level 17 officer from the same state who couldn’t make all the criteria does not mean level 16 officer is now your senior, it is just a duty tour.

    Again we should understand that there are other ambassadorial appointments that will come from outside the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or related agencies, those I could call maybe purely non-career diplomats. It is obvious the government will use those appointments to try and balance any lopsidedness in the current list, unless of course, we again cannot take a political appointee that will meet a criteria that we will set up for that purpose. It is not automatic that for example if I cannot find a suitable APC man in Adamawa State I will go for an APGA man. So I don’t understand the worry while this is just a first phase that is drawn from career civil service. All over the civil service, you will see these type of lopsidedness in which some states do not have certain categories of staff or certain ranks and  therefore when this type of selection comes you will find that the government will not be able to be equitable just because its hands are tied by the system. So I don’t see why the Senate is over working itself about because I don’t think it is lopsided because they haven’t gotten representatives from 32 states, having worked hard to have gotten gender equality, having tried hard to get the people with the correct qualifications; the government can’t be faulted. That is our position, unless of course maybe the Committee on Foreign Relations have a different motive for taking the step they took. We at the executive branch are at a loss and by the way if good faith had been exhibited, all these information I am giving you would easily have been obtained by a simple telephone call to my office and to my person. I don’t understand the stepping down of the consideration which is very injurious to the country because in the long run it could give the impression that our ambassadorial nominees are compromised by the international community. A simple telephone call to me would have addressed these issues. It is not my fault if we want to make ambassadors and we can’t find a level 17 officer who has suitable qualifications from Adamawa state or from wherever. Sometimes, some people will tell you they have a level 17 officer or they have this and this. But after deep analysis of reasons that sometimes you need to protect the reputation and integrity of the person concerned, you will not mention it. For example, for somebody that has been granted accelerated promotion on account of his connections, a time will come when your connections have left or maybe somebody that has received several queries in the course of his service just because he is a level 17 officer or because he is 16 or because he comes from a particular state you want to send that person to become an ambassador. All said and done, we will not reveal all such because of the need to protect the reputation of any individual who has served Nigeria to the best of his ability even if that ability is somehow.

     

    What has delayed the appointments of people into Federal Government boards?

     

    Let me tell you; it took some of the previous governments two years to make board appointments. Now, the issue of board appointments is moving faster than in previous governments. We need to do it very diligently. Up until September, only the president and vice president were running the country and their hands were too full for them to get engaged in board appointments. Then the SGF, Chief of Staff and quite some few others came on board, and it is the OSGF that co-ordinates all of these. The president approved the setting up of a committee late last year to do this. The first thing the committee did was to set up criteria for people who would merit being on a board in an APC government. We needed to get all the parastatals whose boards need to be constituted. Then we did what we called ceding, in the sense that we needed to share the boards in an equitable manner among all the states so that each state, as much as possible, would have its own fair share of board chairmen and board members. I think we started with close to 400 or 500 parastatals. It was not a mean job with board membership of, in those days, I think five to 6, 000 people -chairmen and members- from all the states and we decided to cede them in such a way that when it comes to a state, the board membership must also be representative of the local governments there. So, first, we ceded among the zones, then we said okay, maybe north east zone has 20 chairmanships and 1,000 board membership, then we go back and share the chairmanship in an equitable manner according to the weight of the parastatals because in government I understand there is Category A, B and C boards so that you do not end up with only Category C or A; so it is not a very simple job. While we were doing this, the government had to also look at the Oronsaye report which recommends the scrapping or merging of some parastatals. There was a White Paper by the former government on the implementation of the Oronsaye Report. So, this government decided to study that report which had very good merit in it because a lot of the parastatals were just doing nothing or were doing what others were doing.

     

    So, in considering the Oronsaye Report, is there any likelihood of carrying out the merger or scrapping of parastatals?

     

    Look, the Oronsaye Report is domiciled here as the Secretary to the Government of the Federation. They did a good job, not necessarily that everything is acceptable. What happened to the Oronsaye Report was that they made their recommendations and took it to the Cabinet. By the time the White Paper came out, it appeared that only 40 per cent of the recommendations were approved for implementation by the White Paper. It appeared that every minister started defending his staff. So, for example, parastatals recommended for scrapping suddenly found themselves in the survival list, because government is like that. So, the Oronsaye Report was completely mutilated during the White Paper. While the activity in itself was commendable, as a government, it is only natural that we look at it in the context of our own objectives. So, we are looking at it. A lot of hardwork went into it, and we would like to study it and implement it in agreement with our policies.

     

    Are you most likely to also look at the 2014 Confab Report in that manner?

     

    Well, the government has not taken a decision on the 2014 National Conference. I understand that some Nigerians want it implemented but the government has been too busy with key areas of governance to talk about an exercise that we thought was essentially diversionary and a sort of, maybe, a ‘job for the boys’, because if you remember, it was reported that almost everybody in the committee got N7 million, and we consider it essentially as job for the boys. They probably produced a document that is good and commendable but I mean, this government is too busy with very more vital areas of governance, and we are not intending to spend our time reading reports. The exercise of governance is not about reading reports. The reports are here, so many volumes that for example, it would take me like seven days to go through. Economy needs attention I wonder what happens to my work while I am reading it; while the economy needs attention, unemployment is there, insecurity is there, people are blowing up pipelines and so on.

     

    How true is the allegation in some quarters that you are responsible for the travails of the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu?

     

    Let me tell you, the Office of the Secretary to Government is the punching bag of everybody, and that is how it should be. My own understanding of the present government in relation with the opposition is such that the integrity of our president has been established over his almost 73 years as solid; you cannot assail it. So, the only option left for you as a ‘dirty’ opposition since you must attack the government is to attack those less known. And those less known that are easy targets, that they think when they attack them, they are attacking the president are the SGF, the Chief of Staff, Minister of Petroleum and the CBN Governor, for one reason. These are appointive positions; they are not elective. Probably, they think that “oh, if we make him look dirty, the president would sack me.” In my life, I have seen Ekweremadu for, maybe twice, and the second one, was incidentally, in a church in Yola. I do not understand the psychology of, when you are accused of something, instead of defending yourself, you waste your time hunting for who could have been the cause of your travails. If they remove Ekweremadu as the Deputy Senate President, how does that personally benefit us? Of course, while I was in the party then as National Vice Chairman, it was the party position that because we are the majority party in Parliament, that we should produce all the Principal Officers. To that extent as an APC member, I am not happy that APC has not produced the deputy senate president. It is an aberration, but the senators decided, which is their constitutional right, to create the aberration. The solution, if they need any solution would lie with them not BD Lawal, not SGF because I am not a senator. I am the SGF. So, whoever tells you that I am responsible for the travails of Sen. Ike Ekweremadu is burying his head in the sand rather than running.

     

    When is the president going to start dealing with corrupt persons in APC?

     

    Let us be very sincere and reasonable. Obviously, to my mind, the preponderance of corrupt people would be in the PDP for one reason; they have been in government for 16 years and they were the only ones enjoying the booty, and they were doing it in a flagrant manner. Tracing my own (political) genealogy for instance, from ANPP to CPC and now APC, we were not getting anything. Nobody was giving us contracts. PDP were the ones in government; they were the ones the president was approving money for sharing; they were the ones that took government money to fund their election. This is the truth. APC had no access to government money to fund the president’s election. It got to a stage when PDP saw it clearly on the wall; you remember they even shifted the elections; it was so clear they were going to lose, and so they thought they could buy it. Throughout the last tenure of the Goodluck Jonathan campaign, their goodwill among Nigerians was on the decline and they were spending, and it got to a stage that they did not care about following the due process anymore because they thought they were in power and they thought they could buy their way through and remain in perpetuity. So, they became even careless about the manner they were taking the money. Remember Nigeria even borrowed $100million from the international market to fund the war on Boko Haram and they simply shared it. APC did not go to borrow anywhere. We were not sharing oil wells. We had no access to NNPC funds. So, if these agencies were converted into agencies for looting and pilfering, it is obvious that even if we had corrupt men in the APC, they did not have the opportunity to steal, and that is assuming we had. I cannot, in all honesty, say that all of us in APC are saints, but the truth is, we did not have access to funds to steal in the first place, and so we did not have opportunity also to reject the stealing. So, let them roast in their stew. Let them carry their cross. They can make all the noises and try to deflate APC, but our hands are clean by providence. Look, let us face it. If they arrest you, why don’t you say, ‘I shared the money with so and so persons’ and then let him turn out to be in APC? Those that they are arresting, it is from the interrogation that the information burst out. Let them leave us alone. This is just the beginning. They will return our money by the time we finish digging their soak-aways and bringing down their (overhead) tanks; we would recover our money.

     

  • National Confab, not Yoruba agenda

    A Constitutional lawyer, Dr Tunji Abayomi Tuesday said all those pushing for the implementation of national conference report in yoruba are mere “deceivers”.

    He said the national confab has no yoruba agenda, recalling that it was the human rights group that championed the idea of national conference in 1998.

    According to Abayomi, who is also a chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) he was the one who wrote a letter to the then head of state, Gen Abdulsalam Abubakar (rtd) entitled “the logic of national conference” where the idea of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was mooted.

    He said “for a national conference to have a legitimate constitution arising from the people themselves and secure the approbation of the people, it should not be a conference of appointees of any president where over N12billions of Naira was expended without any justification.

    “We did not subscribe to a national conference where President Jonathan who has only one vote in any election that of next Saturday will appoint 140 people without the consent of those they are representing”

    Abayomi said the National Confab held last year was “a legal and constitutional failure because of being held without the backing of law or constitution as should have been expected from the National Assembly that was vested with power to give approval.

    The legal practitioner said “if Jonathan is going to execute the National Conference report, what he should tell us is how he is going to do it; we yorubas are enlightened, it is not just sufficient for him to talk to us, but to speak to us logically. People like Governor Mimiko have no record of dependency; their words cannot be depended upon”.

    He maintained that there is no way Jonathan can execute National Confab report without the input of the National Assembly.

    “Is the report going to be forced on Nigerians without a law and when the President is not a dictator or how is he going to do it, those yoruba traitors pushing for implementation of the Conference report should stop embarrassing our race,” he said.

  •    National Confab report not enough to endorse Jonathan

       National Confab report not enough to endorse Jonathan

    Chief Niyi Akintola(SAN) is a former deputy speaker, Oyo State House of Assembly and member National Conference. In this interview with ADEBISI ONANUGA, he speaks on the conference and why the Southwest could not present a common agenda, among other issues

    .

    Briefly itemise the demands of the Yoruba at the last National Confer-ence and their current status?

    Let me say that there was no concrete agenda by the Southwesterners before we left for the 2014 National Conference. I am saying this against the backdrop of the fact that we went there as a divided house. Forget about the claim of some people that we had an agenda. There was sectional agenda, no doubt, but we must appreciate that our interests in Yoruba land as at today are not joint but several as it used to be. There was a meeting at Iperu Remo in Ogun State that was supposed to have been attended by credible representatives of the states in the Southwest to aggregate our positions that we will take to the conference. Only Senator Abiola Ajimobi and Dr. Olusegun Mimiko, governors of Oyo and Ondo states were present, out of all the governors in the region. Many of the opinion leaders were absent. Invariably, the credible opinion leaders of the various segments of Yoruba nation were not at that meeting where supposedly the decisions to present the common front were taken. So, by the time we got to Abuja, it was a divided house. Sincerely, we never really got there as a united geo-political zone. Of course, there was a paper that was taken away from Iperu meeting that was meant to be foisted down the throat of every Yoruba man which was resisted.

    As a matter of fact, Governor Ajimobi warned those present at Iperu meeting that they had no mandate to think, speak and take decisions on behalf of the people of Oyo State without consultation and consent of his people. He used the analogy of chief Imams and told them that the mere fact that there were learned scholars in Islam at Ilorin should not qualify one to be imposed as Imam of Ibadanland. He said that certainly, Ibadan people will want to appoint of one of their own as their own Imam, meaning that the fact of having elders sitting at the Iperu meeting does not necessarily means that what was being said there would be acceptable to the elders in Ibadan. In a nutshell, he told them clearly that there must be wide consultations among the people of Yorubaland before any decision was taken. He even reported back to us in Ibadan that his counterpart from Ondo State was not allowed to speak as he was regarded as a small boy who knew very little of Yoruba needs. To that extent, our own mandate from Oyo State was clear and direct. It was to go there and protect the interest of Oyo State and it has nothing to do with party politics or political affiliation. For instance, over 50 percent of the delegates from Oyo State were apolitical. Of the remainders, leaders like Senator Rasheed Ladoja, Brig-General Raji Rasaki, and the likes belong to Accord party and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) respectively. All of us spoke with one voice on what we considered to be the best interest of Oyo State people.

    The situation wasn’t different with the delegates from Ondo, Lagos and Ekiti states. For instance, on the issue of regionalism, the people of Lagos State said Gedegbe leko wa, meaning that they are on their own. Quite unfortunately, we no longer have the likes of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Adekunle Ajasin, Chief Abraham Adesanya, Chief Bola Ige, and co. For example, Ige knew everybody that was somebody in Yorubaland up to Kogi and Kwara States. We don’t have that kind of leaders that have community value across the region again. Things are changing, everybody is becoming a local champion in his own area of birth or influence and we must appreciate that. Take, for instance, the delegates from Ekiti State, led by my teacher, Professor Akin Oyebode, who said that they were not ready to be going to Ibadan to take instruction again.

    But he who understands the political arithmetic of Yorubaland as at today will know that power has even moved away from Ibadan to Lagos. We must accommodate, respect and appreciate our differences, including the changes that are taking place. We had crisis there because we didn’t appreciate our difference and individual state challenges.

    In summary, from what you have said, there was no Yoruba agenda contrary to what is being peddled around?

    There were but there were disagreements along the line. There were also conflicts of interest in the entire Southern part of the country. We had agreement in terms of restructuring but interests were at variant. Take for instance, the issue of Land Use Act. Southwest didn’t buy into the idea of removing Land Use Act which the people of South east and Southsouth wanted. Those of us from Oyo, Osun, and Ekiti states never believed in the Southern solidarity nonsense which they call Southern Solidarity movement because it has not paid the people of Southwest in any form. If there has been any benefit of the movement, the marginalisation of Yoruba wouldn’t have been this pronounced. Not even under Abacha did we have it this bad and rough.

    Today, the financial sector of the country is in the hand of just one ethnic group, so also the power sector of the economy. Unfortunately, when they are trying to satisfy the constitutional requirement by picking one minister from each state, they ensure that they pick only technocrats who have no community value from the Southwest. Though these are highly gifted world class people in their own right and various disciplines and we are very proud of them but they have no political education like their counterpart from the Southeast. If you are in doubt, check the ministries being headed by these Southwesterners and the parastatals under them, compare and contrast these with the ministries being headed by their Southeast counterpart, the parastatals under them and the appointments made therein, the outcome will be too obvious to you. So, what friendship do we have with the Southern Solidarity Movement that is not bothered about our interest apart from using and dumping us?

    Again, some people put up a paper over state creation and they were recommending another state from Ogun State as the only state proposed from the Southwest region when it was thought that only six states would be created. How can anybody who understandS the geographical arithmetic, and knows the political arithmetic of Nigeria and Yoruba land think of creating a state in Yoruba land without mentioning Oyo State first considering the size, population and other criteria? That is another area of disagreement. Ondo State does not agree with most of the things that emanated from Iperu axis because they have their own interest to protect. So, we didn’t really aggregate our interest before leaving for the confab but we all believe in restructuring the country.

    Along what line?

    Along the independence of each state, devolution of power and parliamentary system. The people from the Iperu meeting came there with regionalism and parliamentary system which delegates from Oyo, Ogun and Osun keyed into but which Ondo and Lagos states didn’t believe in. Ekiti was in between.

    What is the status of regionalism?

    It failed.

    So, what did Yoruba bring back from the confab?

    Of all the Yoruba states, Ondo State was the most prepared but generally, we didn’t have that cohesive front. There were those that wanted us to toe the line of South South people which some of us resisted. Our position from Oyo State which Lagos State supported was that if you want resource control whole sale, it must be all embracing. It must include tax, VAT, charges from the ports, and collections from the borders, which some people were not comfortable with.

    What was the outcome of the resource control?

    Stalemate. It did not scale through. The status quo remains. We didn’t get parliamentary system, and full decentralisation. State police scaled through. We also have decentralisation of the court system where we recommended creation of state Court of Appeal. Local government should not be a tier of government in a federal state. The type of what we are having today was a creation of the military. That is why we have a state with 42 local governments as against another with more population having 20.We liberalised it. A state can create as many as 1000 if it can sustain them. If the recommendation is implemented, this country will not remain the same. It will improve greatly. The issue of corruption was tackled headlong. We are having so much at the centre which everybody is scrambling for. Statistics shows that over 80 percent of the landed property in Abuja belongs to the civil servants. In fighting corruption, we have concentrated so much on political exposed persons without looking the way of civil servants that are the source and master minds of corruption. We have had a situation in this country where N20billion was found in the account of an NYSC director who died in a plane crashAmerica and Europe are saturated with the houses of your generals, serving and retired.

    What was the level of success of the conference?

    I will say we achieved between 55 and 60 percent in relation to Yoruba demands and it is not correct to say that we didn’t achieve anything.

    How do you juxtapose your rating with the position of Afenifere, using the implementation of the confab’s report to endorse Jonathan on behalf of the Yoruba?

    Give it to Mimiko. As for the confab, he was the most proactive governor from the region. Mimiko knows and goes for what he wants as a pragmatic man. But I disagree with him for using the confab as a yardstick to endorse one presidential candidate over the other. We should not forget that in 2011, we were railroaded into voting for Jonathan without any demand. I am guilty of it too. We canvassed for him without a charter of demand placed before him unlike our Southeast counterpart, who was more than represented at the federal level. Southeast has Secretary to the Federal Government who coordinates practically all the appointments to the parastatals. Southwest was short changed down the line in terms of appointments. Look at the financial sector, Minister of Finance, and virtually all the heads of parastatals under the ministry go to the East just as it happens in the power sector. Every institution that works today was established by a Yoruba man. For instance, television was first established by a Yoruba man and they took it away from us, ensuring that no Yoruba man gets there, until I made it an issue at the plenary session of the confab after which Sola Omole was appointed to head NTA. BPE was the brain child of Kekere Ekun. They used and dumped him after establishing it. Uncle Fola Adeola was the man who wrote paper on pension, Pension Board has now become the drain pipe which they siphone our money, hardly can we find a Yoruba man there today. In fact, Onagoruwa was removed unceremoniously as DG. Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC) was the brain child of Wole Soyinka. It was established only for Oyo State. I don’t know anywhere in the world where Road Safety issues licenses and plate numbers except in Nigeria. We are not asking for too much. We are only asking our compatriots across the country to allow us to do our own things in our own way and they are denying us. Take for instance, if the dream of our forefathers about Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) was allowed to materialise, we would have been at par with China today. Imagine if Mathematics is being taught in Yoruba Language. In 1982/83, we were to have metroline even before South Africa; it was scuttled by the General Muhammadu Buhari regime. If not for the resilience and pragmatics approaches to infrastructural development in Lagos by Tinubu and Fashola, we would not have that bridge across the Lagoon that links Admiralty Way and Victoria Island and the 10 lanes road to Badagry. We wouldn’t have heard Lekki today because some people somewhere did everything to frustrate those projects hiding under federal might. In fact, at a stage, a minister came from Abuja to stop Lagos-Badagry project.                                                                                                                    I don’t believe that having the Speaker would have improved our lot. No, it doesn’t follow. Bankole was a speaker; the road leading to his home town was not tarred. Olubunmi Etteh was a speaker, her home town, Ikire, had a gully that was killing people every day. The roads are still bad there. It doesn’t follow, it depends on the personality. That was why I advocated the inclusion of technocrats that have community value. Technocrats like Okonjo-Iweala, not a technocrat that is out of touch with his own people. Look at the financial sector, SURE-P, CBN, budget and planning, Stock Exchange, and Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), they are filled with easterners. That we are not well represented in the government shows that we are not as political literate as our people from other zones.  It is very sad that we don’t have leaders to coordinate us like our brothers from the East. Of recent, there were altercations between former CBN governor, Charles Soludo and Okonjo-Iweala, the people that matter in that region came in and said look, the two of you should stop the altercations and we never heard anything from them again. No leaders and no media to defend Yoruba interest again. Before, Tribune used to do that but it has abandoned that role unlike what the Sun Newspaper is doing for the East. Do you know that the MD of Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, is more prosperous, three times than a governor or a minister?  All l have been saying is that the Yoruba in government must draw a line between their political interest and the interest of their people back home. They should stop behaving as if they have all the solution to Nigeria’s problems. They should start behaving like their counterparts from other zones.

     How do you see the roles of the monarchs in this dispensation?

    We have passed through this route before. The Yoruba monarchs have a lot of issues. Some of them don’t see eye to eye. A lot of ego issues. Of course, some of them are pragmatic, highly cerebral and well informed. They need to appreciate and respect each other’s differences. Most of the obas take decisions to spite each others. In any case, how many of them have community value? When you talk of traditional rulers that have community value, Awujale is a deity that every Ijebu person obeys, respect, adore and he doesn’t do anything without consulting his people. Alaafin is on ground “gidigba” among his people up to Oke Ogun. And Olubadan is surrounded by the elites called the CCII, who call the shots. But when you have a republican oba that is highly republican but doesn’t have the followership, then you will appreciate the Yoruba monarchical challenges. Our society is a bundle of contradictions and is characterised by illiteracy: be it political illiterate, economic illiterate, social illiterate, and legal illiterates. That is why you find supposedly educated person but a legal illiterate saying somebody without a university degree should not contest when constitution ordinarily requires aspirant to be educated up to, not necessarily need to pass the exam or produce the certificate.

     Are you still maintaining your position about the Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC) that they are one of the forces that can protect the Yoruba? 

    I respected the then OPC as it was. You will recall that the respect and the encouragement we gave the body during the years of the locust otherwise known as Abacha era. The OPC then was not exposed to the lure of political patronages. The OPC then was highly principled, focused on the ideology of Yoruba nation, and believed in the concept of “Omoluabi”. The OPC of today is not the same as the OPC of the yore. The present day OPC is factionalised. The leadership has tasted the forbidden fruit and the body is now the OPC of anything goes. It is my prayer that the body will retrace its step to the path of honour and gain the respect it commands among various Yoruba national among Nigerians extraction irrespective of their political lineage and ideology. The recent happening among the ranks and files is very saddening and no Yoruba man of impeccable character should be proud of the development. The fault really did not emanate solely from the leadership of the body but rather the blame should be put at the door step of Yoruba political elites whom on gaining political ascendancy with political power, money and influence started inciting the OPC members and indeed erstwhile benefactors started treating them like lepers. This ingratitude on the part of most Yoruba political office holders infuriated the leadership of OPC. Frustration now set in and the leadership, to have it back on this political office holders, seceded to depart from the path of “Omoluabi”, which was the set goal of the movement at its inception.  It is rather unfortunate that most of the political office holders turned out to be ingrate and forgot where they were coming fromThey started maligning friends at the expense of the older ones thereby turning many former friends into sworn enemies and the resultant effect is what we are now witnessing in Yorubaland. It is simply a matter of failed leadership at all levels.

    What is your advice to the people of the Southwest?

    Yoruba should stop playing God over the affairs of Nigeria. I think it is time Yoruba people start behaving like their counter parts from other zones who will sacrifice anything for the common people of their region. We should not go to vote blind folded. We should play the game the way it is being played by other zones because we can’t be the only sane person in the midst of six mad people or the only virgin in the maternity ward. Again, we should learn to talk less and stop revealing our strength and wining strategy until when it is right to so do. For those that do the dirty jobs, they should appreciate the fact that there is a thin line between honour and dishonour in Yorubaland and once you cross it, you are a goner. If anyone is in doubt, he should go and learn from those that went against the wishes of Yoruba nation during the Abacha regime. The people concerned are still fighting the battle of their lives for relevance. My brothers and kinsmen, Governor Ayodele Fayose and Femi Fani-Kayode should thread softly in carrying out their national assignments. They have the right to hold different opinions from that of their compatriots, but they should thread softly in carrying out their assignments and pursue same within the concept of “Omoluabi”. They should stop selling their kinsmen cheaply because they may not be able to buy them back at a very high price.

    With the way things are, the marriage between the South and the North seems not to be working. Why is it difficult to divorce?

    My brother, the life span of Nigeria is not up to 20 years unless we change our ways. Except there is total devolution of power, and decentralisation of powers, the marriage will collapse. It is not the question of marriage between the North and the South, even among the Southerners, there is injustice, and lack of respect for each other differences. The problem of Nigeria is not caused by the North but rather it was caused by the structure which we are operating at present. There is too much injustice and where there is injustice, there can’t be peace. Unfortunately, our political leaders don’t read. It was over centralisation that killed the old Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Sudan. It is over centralisation that is killing Britain, even the state of Texas is asking for its marriage to be dissolved in USA.

    At every slightest opportunity, you say that you can’t contest election. Why?

    Yes, for now l can’t. Apart from the fact that I don’t have enough money for such venture, I am too blunt even against myself. I am a realist. I believe in what it is as against what ought to be. Many elites out there are living in self-denial and they play the ostrich most of the time. For instance, most of those who fraternised and benefited immensely from Alhaji Lamidi Adedibu, General Olusegun Obasanjo and Asiwaju Ahmed Tinubu are now turning out to fight the same system that brought them to limelight. The question is: why must you smell something you can’t swallow? When you are benefiting from the system, you are not asking questions only for you to cry blue murder when the same method is being used to shortchange you. I hope I have answered your question.

     

     

  • Confab: North rejects recommended eight states

    The Northern States Forum (NSF) of the National Association of State Movements (NASM) on Friday rejected the eight states recommended for the region in the report of the just concluded National Conference.

    The Conference had recommended a total of 10 states for South and eight for the North in its report.

    The NSF of NASM in a statement in Abuja and signed by its Chairman, Senator Ahmad Zakari and Secretary, Dr. Yakubu Ugwolawo, said the Forum was still at a loss over the yardstick used by the confab delegates to recommend the creation of the 18 additional states.

    The group called for the creation of Hadeija State from the existing North Western Zone and Okura State from the North-Central zone.

    Senator Ahmad told reporters at a news conference in Abuja that the absence of a clear guideline used to determine the 18 states recommended has impugned the credibility of the exercise.

    Ahmad argued that the history of Nigeria did not begin with six geo-political zones now being made sacrosanct for all-purpose treatment of Nigerian socio-political and economic problems.

    He noted that it can never be an equitable exercise to treat the North-West zone with a population of 35,786,944 and 216,065 square kilometres on the same pedestal with the South-East zone with a population of 16,381,729 and a land mass of 29,526 square kilometres.

    While describing the logic as absurd and confusing, Ahmad noted that if statistics are to be used to confer advantage on a zone, the same use of statistics should be used for all zones.

    He insisted that the recommendation of the Conference in terms of state creation was skewed against the North-West and North-Central zones of the country.

  • ‘NASS will not adopt national confab proceedings’

    ‘NASS will not adopt national confab proceedings’

    A member representing Egor/Ikpoba-Okha Federal Constituency at the House of Representatives, Jim Adun has reacted to the proceedings in the ongoing National confab stating that it will not see the light of the day.

    Honorable Adun, a two-time house of Representative member expressed deep reservations about the Confab added that it will be a slight on the National assembly to adopt proceedings from a selected body to be passed into law

    He said whereas members of the National Assembly were elected by the people to represent them and make laws for the good governance of the people, it will be according to him ‘foolhardy’ to think that proceedings from the delegate conference will be adopted.

    Adun who is seeking to represent Edo South Senatorial District under the platform of the All Progressive Congress (APC) at the Senate said “I am one individual who is against the national conference. It is an exercise in futility. How do you get unelected people to waste public resources and make recommendations for us to pass into law”

    “We must face the truth. We have weak persons in government if you can shut down the state and National Assemblies and let us go and have a National Conference.”

    Speaking on his senatorial ambition Adun said “we have taken cue from the state and the challenge before us is to improve on what then state governor has done. We have achieved a lot in the House of Representatives in terms of bringing to our people dividends of democracy to our people.”

  • Conference adjourns abruptly amidst tension

    Proceedings at the National Conference came to an abrupt end on Tuesday afternoon after a motion for adjournment was moved and unanimously supported.

    The Conference was on the verge of commencing the adoption of the amendments and recommendations of the Committee on Devolution of Power report.

    The postponement was sequel to a motion by Gen. Ike Nwachukwu, leader of the South East delegation to the Conference who, after the resumption from short break at about 12.15pm raised the motion on the need to adjourn sitting till Wednesday.

    He said the need for adjournment was necessitated by a deadlock in negotiation between various interest groups on contentious issues of derivation formula, resource control and the items on legislative lists, among others.

    Accordion to him, leaders from the six geo-political zones met on Monday till 1.00am to resolve the issues with a view of coming to a consensus.

    He, however, pleaded that the leadership of the conference allow for more time to conclude the consultations before the adoption of the report recommendations.

     

  • Confab: IYC rejects state creation proposal

    The Ijaw Youths Council (IYC) on Friday rejected the recommendation of the National Conference for the creation of 18 additional states in the country.

    It said the recommendation of only one state for the Ijaw as against the two sought by them was unacceptable.

    The IYC in a statement issued  in Warri  by its spokesman, Eric Omare,  also  threatened that the  Ijaw would start reconsidering their status  in  Nigeria should the conference fail to make amends  and  give the “fourth largest ethnic group in Nigeria” a fair consideration in state creation.

    The IYC said only the creation of Toru-Ebe State from the present Edo and Ondo States and Oil River State from the current Rivers and Akwa-Ibom States would appease the Ijaws.

     

  • Ijaw youths condemn retention of derivation formula

     

    The Ijaw Youths Council (IYC) has rejected the report of the Power Devolution Committee of the National Conference, which retained the 13 per cent derivation fund for oil producing states.

    IYC, in a statement issued by its spokesman, Eric Omare, in Warri on Monday, also expressed disappointment in representatives of the Niger Delta in the committee, especially its chairman, former governor of Akwa-Ibom State, Obong Victor Attah, for betraying the common position of the people of the oil-rich region on resource control.

    The congress, however, noted that a meeting of the people of Niger Delta would soon hold to take appropriate steps on how to penalise representatives of the region at the ongoing conference who had so far taken positions contrary to the collective position of Niger Delta people on resource control.

    IYC said it regarded the excuse of national interest and threat of secession as feeble and unjust to the fate of the people of the oil-region, whom it said had borne the destructive after effects of oil and gas prospection and exploitation activities over the years.

    “That Niger Deltans read the said interview with disappointment and regard it as a complete betrayer of trust. Obong Victor Attah and other South-South Delegates who served in the Committee on devolution of power and agreed to retain the 13 per cent  derivation did so on their own and not on behalf of the Niger Deltans.

    “The Niger Delta people have a common position on the issue of resource control which cannot be changed unilaterally by Obong Attah and its co-travellers. It is disappointing that Obong Attah, a former advocate of resource control could justify retaining 13 per cent derivation considering the fact that the 2005 Obasanjo’s political Reform Conference had recommended an increase in derivation about nine years ago.

    “The IYC regards the national interest and threat to secession, which Obong Attah cited as their justifications for retaining 13 per cent as feeble and unjustifiable. The legitimate demand of the Niger Delta people to control their resources in line with tenets of federalism cannot in any way amount to threat to national interest. In any case, the Niger Delta region has sacrificed enough by bearing the hazards of laying the golden egg that sustains Nigeria, “the group said.

  • Derivation principle tears confab delegates apart

    The recommendation by the National Conference Committee on Devolution of Power to retain the 30 per cent derivation principle became an issue on Thursday.

    Co-Chairman of the committee, Obong Victor Attah, had submitted the report of the committee to the conference in plenary for consideration.

    Hardly had Attah submitted that report than a member of the committee, Ms Annkio Briggs requested to tender a minority report particularly on derivation principle.

    Briggs described herself as a lone voice who did endorse the recommendation to retain the 30 per cent derivation principle.

    A delegate, Haliru Bello, drew the attention of the delegates that the conference rules of procedure did not give room for minority report.

    He noted that the rule states that decisions could either be reached by consensus or where consensus failed, 70 per cent vote in favour of an item.

    He said the conference should not accept any minority report in order not to create room for delegates to flood the conference with minority reports.

    Chairman of the conference, Justice Idris Kutigi (rtd), said that Bello’s observation was apt.

    He agreed that the conference rule of procedure did not give room for minority report.

    He said that committees were asked to reach decision by consensus or 70 per cent vote in favour of an item.

    According to him, “minority report is unknown to our rule.”

    Kutigi ruled that Briggs minority report should be accepted but marked “rejected.”

    Most other members agreed and asked Kutigi to disregard the minority report.

    A member, Dr. Isaac Osuoka disagreed.

    He said the conference should do away with “the tyranny of the majority.”

    He insisted that the tyranny of the majority has been the bane of growth in the country.

    He said that since the committee failed to achieve consensus on the matter, there should have been a vote to decide the issue.