Tag: National conference

  • Stop security votes

    I AM appealing to the delegates to the National Conference to come up with decisions that will stop the obnoxious security votes. This money is not being used to provide security in the strict sense of the word. Those who are managing the votes are largely using them to benefit themselves and their families.

    The votes should be used to provide housing for the poor in this country. This is highly necessary because most of the masses are homeless.

    The delegates should stop impunity; make Senate membership part time; make education free up to the basic level; provide health insurance to orphans and widows; and attract massive industrial investments to create jobs.

    Uche A C,

  • National Conference gets six more weeks

    National Conference gets six more weeks

    The ongoing National Conference in Abuja has been extended by six weeks.

    The conference will now end on July 31 instead of June 19.

    A new work plan has been released by the leadership of the conference.

    The consideration of the draft report of the conference has been fixed for July 21-24.

    The production and signing of the final report will be between July 28 and 31.

    No reason was given for the extension of the conference, but some delegates said “we still have a lot of areas uncovered”.

    Speaking on the six-week extension, a former Chairman of PUNCH Nig. Ltd. and delegate at the Conference, Chief Ajibola Ogunshola, observed that four weeks were proposed for drafting of the report.

    He advised that no delegates should be paid for the four weeks designed for drafting the report since it is only the secretariat that will be involved.

    Ogunshola said: “I have observed that four weeks of the proposed extension is for drafting of conference report which is from June 16 to July 14.

    “June 16 to July 14 is for drafting of the conference report. During that period, there should be no  payment to delegates since it is the secretariat that will be involved in the drafting of the report”, he added.

    Also yesterday, the leadership of labour unions protested the move by the Conference to take Minimum Wage and Labour from the Exclusive Legislative List to the Concurrent List.

    The National Conference Committee on Devolution of Power made the recommendation.

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) led other unions to kick against the recommendation.

    NLC President Abdulwahid Omar, who spoke when the unionists appeared before the Committee, noted that the decision is against the interest of workers.

    Omar urged the committee to reconsider its decision.

    He said: “Those who are behind this (removal of the Minimum Wage and Labour from the Exclusive List) are doing it for their own narrow and selfish interests.

    “We were worried when we heard that your committee had decided to migrate labour issues to the concurrent list from the exclusive legislative list. This is not the first time we have to speak on this. We even made a presentation before the Senate when it decided to do the same thing your committee has done. After our presentation, the Senate reverted”.

    Omar noted that it will be counter-productive to dissipate much energy on natural resource control without recognizing the prime position which the human resource occupies.

    He said that the removal would be against the minimum wage policy.

    According to him, it is important for the country to sustain a federally-accepted remuneration system.

    He insisted that delisting labour from the exclusive list would empower states to treat workers unfairly.

    TUC President Kaigama Bala Bobboi, and the Chief Economic Adviser of NLC, Dr Peter Oso-Esug,  said labour should not be pushed over to states for reasons associated with fear of emasculating workers.

    But a delegate from Akwa Ibom State, Prof. Nsongurua Udombana, referred the unionists to the Constitution and stated that the unions laid much emphasis on national minimum wage instead of making a holistic presentation on every issue captured in the exclusive legislative list as it affects labour matters.

    Udombana wondered why the Federal Government should bear the burden of labour issues, which are exclusively state matters.

    He said a situation where the Federal Government is made to also fund state universities, appropriately established by state legislation, is unacceptable in a federal state.

    The Co-Chairman of the Committee, Obong Victor Attah, praised the unionists for engaging the committee on the matter.

    Attah said that improper motive implied by the unionists was wrong.

    According to him, the choice of words of Comrade Omar to the effect that “those behind this move are doing it for their narrow selfish reasons” was wrong.

    Attah noted that minimum wage is not threatened by the decision.

    He said that matter of strike must also think of justice for the employer and not just about the workers.

    Senator Anthony Adefuye noted that the decision would prevent the country from having national strikes.

  • More states, independent candidacy

    More states, independent candidacy

    At the National Conference this week, the committees set up last week commenced sitting.

    Contrary to the fears expressed earlier on that they may be constrained by the limited time available for their deliberations, reports this week show that the committees may be faster than envisaged by skeptical Nigerians.

    For example, the Committee on Political Restructuring  during the week adopted a resolution for the creation of an additional state in the South- East geo-political zone to ensure equity among the six geo-political zones.

    Co-Chairmen of the committee, Mr. Mukaila Muhammed and Gen. Ike Nwachukwu, announced this on Thursday in Abuja at the end of the committee’s session.

    The Co-Chairmen said the South-East zone deserves to have six states like other zones that have six or seven states each.

    “Therefore, it was agreed that one additional state should be added to the South-East zone. That is the first part of our resolution on the issue of creation of states.

    “The second part is a resolution that we recognise that there are other genuine demands for creation of states from all the other zones including the South-East itself.

    “We said all these demands should be looked at, and decisions made should be taken based on the merits of such demands.

    “We are to look at the viability, contiguity and other factors that determine creation of states.

    “My committee members discern the need for Nigeria to have more states, and the need to have it based on merit.

    “And particularly, to give the South-East at this conference an additional state bringing it in line with other zones with six states.

    The Committee on Political Parties and Electoral Matters in its resolution recommended that all elected and appointed office holders in the country who defect from their political parties to another be made to automatically lose their offices or seats.

    The committee equally recommended independent candidacy and unbundling of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, so that a different body can be solely responsible for registration and regulation of political parties in the country. The committee, which is co-chaired by two former Senate Presidents, Ken Nnamani and Iyorchia Ayu, also recommended that Federal Government should stop giving subventions to political parties.

    Chairperson sacked

    But for the Committee on Civil Society, Labour and Sports, it was a week of action as it sacked its chairperson, Bola Ogunrimade, for absenteesm. The committee replaced the sacked chair with her deputy, Issa Aremu. The committee, which is one of the ten committees of the confab sitting at the NICON Luxury Hotel, took the decision in a unanimous vote.

    “Because of persistent non-appearance of the chairperson, the committee members have asked me to take over as the chairman and we intend to communicate this to the secretariat,” Mr. Aremu said while speaking to reporters after the sitting of the committee. Mr. Aremu said the former chairperson has not reported formally since the committee took off. “It is going to be difficult to drive a committee which you don’t know the concept and the idea we have been running,” he said.

  • Resource Control splits National Conference delegates

    Resource Control splits National Conference delegates

    There were fireworks at the Committee on Devolution of Power as northern delegates and their counterparts from the South South refused to back down on their demands on resource control.

    The Nation gathered that trouble started when a member from the South South submitted that the host communities should have control of natural resources found within their areas.

    Another member who is an expert in international law took his time to explain the implications of littoral states and the resources found within.

    The Northern delegates would however have none of it, when a member countered the submission stating that littorFal States can not have total control of resources found in the waters around them.

    It was a heated argument, according to a source who pleaded anonymity between the two divided.

    “The firework has started already as the federalists expect the status quo to remain while the other side felt that if Justice and equity that everybody has been preaching must come to play, then it should be extended to the resources found in any area.

    “So far, the South West delegates are calming frayed nerves and have not yet make their positions on the subject known.

    “We have just started, we expect to see maturity come to play as we progress in this assignment,” he said.

    The argument continued outside the meeting room as the two delegates were seen exchanging words.

    The northern delegate said he would have been a Professor if he had wanted to while his southern colleague sarcastically responded that he (the northern delegate) doesn’t need it.

    An elder statesman eventually intervened and calmed the southern delegate down.

    Earlier, Chairman of Committee on Devolution of Power, former governor Victor Obong Attah said his Committee would seek direction from past historical documents like the 1914 Amalgamation document, the 1967 broadcast by Gen. Yakubu Gowon as well as Gen Ibrahim Babangida’s political bureau.

    He also hoped that the committee would be able to reach consensus on most of its deliberations.

    The Co-Chairman, Ibrahim Coomassie, former Inspector General of Police (IGP) reminded members that would want to agitate for the control of resources that the purpose of governance is the welfare and security of the people.

    He said without the resources, government can not carry out its responsibilities to the people while ethnic, religious or resource agitation would be impossible.

    Committee on Politics and Governance is set out to concentrate on how governance can transform the lives of Nigerians, the Chairman, Prof. Jerry Gana has said.

    Saying that the committee would not be interested in theories, Gana said members of the committee would focus on human development anchored on equity, justice, fairness and good governance that would promote rule of law and quality service to the people.

    Saying that a leader is as effective as the quality of its inner circle team, the former Minister of Information said the Committee would be working towards transparency, accountability, efficiency in public administration as well as development oriented budgeting.

    He however stressed the need to enshrine the promotion of the rule of law in the polity as fundamental to the achievement of the goals of the conference.

    The Committee also said it would work towards the removal of influence of money from politics in the country.

    Co-Chairman of the Committee. Chief Olu Falae said blamed the near absence of good governance in the country on money politics.

    He said: “What has emerged from our discussion so far is that good governance really depends on the quality of leadership. We have the laws; we have the constitution and we know the procedures. But is the leadership ready to take action?

    “The way the political parties are organised is also a problem. They don’t have internal democracy. Governors have emerged as virtual dictators because they control the resources of the state.

    “It is money that speaks and until we reduce the role of money in our politics, we will not have good leadership. As it is today, any position can be bought and not earned or merited”.

  • National Conference delegates protest over committees

    National Conference delegates protest over committees

    Protests dominated yesterday’s proceedings at the National Conference, as delegates complained about procedures and the composition of committees.

    Youths, women, traditional rulers all aired their disagreement with the composition of the committees, despite the release of an addendum list, which they claimed, was also inadequate.

    Youths at the conference, numbering 18, said they were excluded from four sensitive committees.

    Clifford Abur, who spoke for the youth, said they identified the conference as an opportunity to contribute to nation building and correct the negative impressions about the youths.

    He cited thecommittees on security and devolution of power as instances where no youth delegate was represented, adding that the youths have been identified as foot soldiers for the crimes and security breaches around the country, such as violence, kidnapping, bombing and other vices.

    According to him, it would be an injustice for the youth to be denied the opportunity of contributing to such key committees work that touches on the future of the country.

    He said the youths were not satisfied with the list.

    He apologised to the Chairman, Justice Idris Kutigi for addressing him in harsh voice and threatening a youth action if corrections were not made in favour of the youths.

    Women at the conference also protested for not being evenly spread among the Committees, in addition to not being given enough leadership positions in the Committees.

    According to Rabi Ibrahim, being lumped in one committee would not serve the best interest of the women and their individual expertise.

    Ramatu Bala Usman, who advocated for 35 percent affirmative action in the leadership of the Committees for women said equity should be observed by the Secretariat.

    Hajia Mariam Bubba was against the Chairmanship of some Committees by old politicians, whom she said had headed similar Committees in previous conferences without having anything to show for it.

    Akiyode Afolabi kicked against designation of some as ‘super delegates’ for being placed in choice committees.

    She also complained about the Chair of Civil Society Committee that was headed by a woman who has never worked in the sector before.

    Traditional rulers also voiced their grievances of being confined in areas where they can offer useful suggestions.

    Oba Aderemi Adedapo said to have lumped all the traditional rulers in one Committee was a deservice to the individual expertise of the monarchs.

    According to him, there are several professionals among the traditional rulers and their experience would be useful if spread to other committees.

    Femi Falana also complained about the inadequacy in the composition of the committees, citing the exclusion of the youth delegates from fundamental committees.

    He also raised the issue of preferential treatment for some heads of delegation in picking their choice of committee.

    He said being a head of delagation he was never accorded such treatment.

    However, Falana advised that those with genuine concerns about the committees should formally address it to the Secretariat for necessary correction so that proper committee business would commence by Tuesday.

    The chairman denied Falana’s allegation of preferential treatment.

    He said the Secretariat worked with the list submitted by all the delegates. He urged those with complaints to make them available on time for the Secretariat to work before Tuesday.

    The chairman announced that committee session would commenced on Tuesday with 10 committees holding their sessions in the National Judicial Institute (NJI) venue of the conferemce and the other 10 holding theirs at Sheraton Hotel and Towers.

    It was announced that Ambassador Abdulmumin Abubakar who slumped on Tuesday evening is in a stable condition.

    Delegates used the opportunity to demand a functional medical facility in the complex having been told that the ambulance that conveyed Abubakar has no oxygen.

    Justice Kutigi said there was a clinic in the complex but knew nothing about oxygen.

    Justice Mamman Nasir (rtd) raised a motion of urgent public importance on the need for the conference to raise a delegation to meet and advise President Goodluck Jonathan on how to disregard disparaging statement aimed at him by governors and others.

    According to him, the President should no longer join issues with governors that were against him.

    He said the situation the country is in at the moment should be of concern to everyone and that exchanging words with governors would rather distract the President.

    He said the President should be more tolerant and patient witb those against him being the leader of the country.

    Sergeant Awuse, while seconding the motion, advised those that were hauling expletives on the President to desist.

    Besides, the President should be respected by the governors, if they expect respect from their own citizens too, he added.

    However, in the midst of arguement for and against on procedural defects of the motion observed by some delegtes, plenary went on to other matters without voting on the motion.

    The chairman had to use his authority to overrule delgates that clamoured for adjournment till Tuesday, 22nd rather than today.

    He had problem finding who to second the motion for adjournment till today until he called on Iyom Josephine Anenih, who said she seconded it according to the chairman’s wish.

  • The siege of the light brigade

    The siege of the light brigade

    As a prelude to the “democratic” war of succession that will make or mar Nigeria, irrespective of the outcome of the ongoing National Conference, the old west is being gradually militarised. The entire region appears to have been placed on the political equivalent of a war footing. The siege is on. It is the kind of shock and awe military terror that will turn Stormin Norman Shwarzkopf to a whimpering old bugger.

    A pincer movement is unfolding with the major strategic objective of paralysing the dominant political tendency in the region, or at the minimum render it hors de combat in the bid to capture power at the centre. You cannot be advancing when your stronghold has been set on fire. Militarily, it is known as a bridge too far.

    With Musiliu Obanikoro, the newly appointed Minister of State for Defence, war-gaming from Lagos all the way to the Ilaje coastline, with Iyiola Omisore and Jelili Adesiyan sadistically probing the heart and plexus of the old region in Osun state, and with a column of reaction heading from Ondo to link up with joyous thugs and fifth columnists already in place in Ekiti-land, once again the Yoruba nation is being turned into a theatre of war and strife.

    This time around, it promises to be the mother of all political wars. But it is the charge of the light and light-headed brigade, and once again, they shall not pass. After the rubble might have cleared, Nigeria will never be the same again. No politician or political group will ever be allowed to come to the western sphere again with the threat of war as the antidote to peace and progress. Even for a libertarian and seemingly carefree people, there is time for everything.

    This is not an idle intellectual speculation, but a conclusion reached after a rigorous interrogation of the unfolding political process in the region. It is either the dawn of a new era or darkness forever. The reasons for this stark conclusion are threefold, and they are historical and sociological in nature. It is proper to delve into recent history first.

    After the annihilation and political obliteration of the PDP from the region, the whole place has experienced a period of development and accelerated modernity. It is not a perfect state but the fruits are showing for all to see. Not even personal hatred for the individual actors involved or animus towards the chief motivator can remove the fact. From Benin to Ekiti, through Osun, Oyo, Ogun and unto Lagos, the old West is experiencing a developmental resurgence akin to a religious revival.

    The people are grateful for the relative peace and stability that being relatively well-governed has brought unlike many other places in the country that have degenerated into hell-holes before our very eyes. You cannot give what you don’t have. At the federal level at least, the ruling party has shown itself to be ideologically bereft and politically bankrupt. As a party, the PDP is beyond soap and water.

    You cannot confront light, however imperfect, with darkness however perfect. In order to make a dent in the evolving political consciousness of the sophisticated electorate of Western Nigeria, the PDP will have to come up with a superior paradigm of development and progress. It will have to come up with a visionary blueprint for the radical amelioration of the suffering and biblical misery which have plagued this land and turned Nigeria into the world capital of cannibal capitalism.

    But after fifteen fruitless years in power, it is clear that the PDP lacks the intellectual cadre, the political discipline, the psychological stamina, the moral magnitude and imagination to come up with a transformative blueprint. As its body language reveals, it is obvious that it relies mainly on force and thuggery, when it is not fanning the ember of religion and ethnicity in a dangerously polarised polity like Nigeria. The kind of murderous and misbegotten individuals its primaries have thrown up in western Nigeria shows its contempt for the feeling and sensitivity of the Yoruba people.

    The PDP is relying on old tricks where only new techniques will suffice. It will meet more than its match in the old West. You cannot fight a modern battle with ancient weapons, particularly a battle also joined at the level of an intellectual contestation for human consciousness and the greater good of the greater community. Unlike the old guard progressives who were sold on law and order, the hazards of the Hansard and other parliamentary canards, the new generation of progressives cut their teeth on the streets and in the trenches fighting against military despotism.

    There is always a tide in human affairs. Anybody who witnessed the dogged ferocity, the relentless commotion with which Oshiomhole, Aregbesola and Fayemi and even the normally urbane and debonair Abiola Ajimobi fought to reclaim their stolen mandate will be living in a fools’ paradise to ever imagine that they will allow themselves to be flushed out of their respective gubernatorial mansions like terrified mice, more so when they have the might of the multitude behind them.

    Anybody who mistake Oshiomhole’s gamey gambolling for complacency, Aregbesola’s steely sangfroid and diligent defiance for loss of concentration, or Kayode Fayemi’s donnish demureness for loss of power appetite will have themselves to blame when real political hostilities commence.

    It is curious that despite all the information available to him on the disposition of the region, President Jonathan has allowed himself to be sold the impossible betise that all he needs to do is to spring some politically expired thugs on the region and the people will scatter. We hope the federal collaborators and their new recruits take note of this show of love and admiration.

    The people of the west have never scattered before bullets. As their tormentors always find out to their peril, when they retreat it is usually to gather momentum for the next determined push against the bastion of reaction. In the history of modern Nigeria, the west has never sought to dominate anybody, but it will resist domination, whether internally or externally inspired.

    All the west had tried to do is to extend its vision of modernity and life more abundant for everybody, irrespective of race, region and religion. In this seemingly quixotic venture, it has met impossible and impregnable impedimenta, not to talk of an iron road block, and it has paid terrifying price in the loss of many of its golden children.

    But whenever these moderate ideals of human emancipation are brutally suppressed such as happened during the First Republic, the repressed always return with greater vigour and ferocity such as we witnessed in the Second Republic and the aborted Third Republic when an impossible coalition headed by M.K.O Abiola won a presidential election that was summarily annulled. In the Fourth Republic, the very same ideals have turned out to be the most potent threat to a clueless Federal Government.

    We cannot try to hang the messenger while ignoring the message. There must be something about this progressive ideal of an emancipated community which must explain their durability and persistent eruptions. What Jonathan and his henchmen should do is to study this ideal of governance, interrogate it intensely and see whether there are no lessons to be learnt.

    There is no harm in picking the brains of your political adversaries. As old Abe Lincoln famously demonstrated, there are immense political advantages accruing from converting political adversaries to principled collaborators. The Nigerian project, or whatever remains of it, is too important to be left at the mercy of small minds.

    Having said all this, it is also time for our progressives to engage in intense soul-searching and deep introspection about the tortured trajectory of progressive politics in contemporary Nigeria and the kind of progressive ideals they want to bequeath to coming generations. There can be no successful externally induced plot without a successful internal conspiracy.

    Yoruba modern history is steeped in internal treachery, betrayals and perfidy. It may be due to the libertarian nature of the people which abhors despotism and unwarranted domination. In post-colonial Nigeria, the cloak and dagger politics have accentuated rather than diminish. This may be due to the epic sweepstakes of a predatory economy. But the question the progressives need to ask themselves is why since independence and up till now, the people who have always given them the worst troubles and headaches are people who have at one time or the other been part of the progressive umbrella.

    In the First Republic, the Action Group fractured irretrievable as a result of external plots and internal rebellion. In retrospect, it can be seen that the Action Group was a disaster waiting to happen, being an ersatz and unstable coalition of modernists, monarchists and outright rightwing reactionaries. But a firm lid could be placed on the simmering cauldron as long as there was a strong and charismatic leader like Obafemi Awolowo at the helm.

    In the Second Republic, the party fissured as a result of the jostling and jockeying for position among Chief Awolowo’s closest aides and lieutenants. In retrospect, it can safely be said that it was ironically the military bell that saved the UPN from catastrophic implosion. Awo himself hinted at this in his last epistle to the faithful in which he made an allusion to a coming Hegelian synthesis.

    Just before the Third Republic could be properly inaugurated, the entire party machinery seceded to the waiting military thus sealing Abiola’s fate. From that moment, the Republic died in vitro, as they say. Now in the Fourth Republic, we are witnessing a wearisomely familiar script with so many falcons deserting the falconer. Take a count of the following and find out where and how they originated: Omisore, Obanikoro, Dayo Adeyeye, the late Wahab Dosunmu, Gbenga Daniel and now the young and youthful Michael Opeyemi Bamidele.

    The situation calls for a candid evaluation of the following: the mode of leadership recruitment to the progressive fold, the pattern of political preferment and the process of consensus building among the progressives. It is in human nature for those who have been given undue and premature preferment to develop outsize appetite for power and glory.

    While those who are sworn to the progressive ideal as a lifelong commitment to fundamental principles could afford to be sidelined or treated with brutal disregard, it should now be obvious that the political wayfarers and those who have not reached the level where individual ego can be subordinated for communal good would have none of that. Bar a few sublime souls, the anarchic ego is an outgrowth of anarchic and inchoate human societies.

    These are the historic demons the progressive leadership would have to grapple with as they seek to protect their political stronghold even while making a bold pitch for the centre. It is going to be a tough call, particularly given the cultural anxieties and markers of political incompatibilities the coalescing factions bring to the alliance. But it is not an impossible task. As for the light Brigade, perhaps it is time to retrieve their history books from roasted plantain hawkers.

  • National Conference could immortalize Nigerians

    In human history, the ongoing National Conference in Abuja is the kind of event that confers immortality on some persons. Its story could end up being as follows: The greatest modern country of modern Africa and of the Black race stood on the verge of collapse. But it occurred to one leader to put a National Conference together to save the situation. Some men answered the call of duty at the conference, pulled delegates from disparate directions together, and saved the tottering country and set it on the path to stability, prosperity and greatness in the world.

    Were this the outcome of this National Conference, President Goodluck Jonathan, of course, and his posterity forever, would earn the most precious laurel of all. But there would be many others who would earn laurels almost as precious as his.

    For every one of the nearly 500 delegates at the conference, a successful conference that changed the destiny of Nigeria would be, certainly, the most important historic event in their lives – a proud record for themselves and their families forever. And then there are some who are already eminent citizens, and who are now leading various delegations at the conference. In the souls of such men and women, given the moral mess that Nigeria has become, a titanic battle must now be raging – either to strive hard and sacrifice all in the quest for a great Nigeria, or merely to surrender to base desires like seeking to enrich themselves in Abuja, Throne of Corruption. If they choose the noble path and save Nigeria, the rewards are likely to be dizzyingly mighty.

    I know virtually all of these leading citizens. Most of them belong to my generation, and some are my friends. I am excited for all of them from all corners of Nigeria. But, because of the limitation of space, I will pin-point only the few who belong to my Yoruba nation.

    After President Jonathan set up an Advisory Committee for the National Conference and called for memos, countless meetings followed all over Nigeria – some by leaders of nationalities, some by civil society organizations, some by professional groups, etc. Among my own people, the Yoruba nation, all these finally climaxed in many Yoruba national conferences – in the Palace of Oduduwa at Ife, in Ishara, and then in Ibadan. The final conferences in Ibadan were particularly widely publicized, and large crowds came without restriction from all over Yorubaland.

    Two major things resulted from these conferences. The first is a small leadership team, consisting of Chief Olu Falae as chairman, Gen. Alani Akinrinade as vice-chairman, and Dr. Kunle Olajide as secretary, charged with the task of guiding the whole exercise. Successive conferences accepted, endorsed and validated this little working committee for the Yoruba nation. Around it there also coalesced other prominent leaders – among those who finally made it to the National Conference, old warriors like Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Sir Olaniwun Ajayi and Dr. Tunji Braitwaite, and younger warriors like Hon. Wale Oshun, Pastor Tunde Bakare, Otunba Gani Adams, and others.

    The second thing from the many Yoruba conferences is what we call the Yoruba Agenda for the National Conference. We Yoruba, of all political persuasions, have, since 1949, been proposing clear ideas about how to organize Nigeria, a country of multiple nationalities, into a harmonious and workable federation. Central to these views has always been the idea that our various nationalities should be respected, and be made the basis for structuring the Nigerian Federation – that the large and sizeable nationalities should each constitute a federating unit, and that smaller and contiguous nationalities in various parts of Nigeria should join to constitute federating units. Another important idea is that the federating units should be strong constitutionally and materially, so as to be competent centres of development. In recent years, the latter has meant that the excessive powers and resources perversely loaded onto the federal government by the military regimes should be returned to the federating units. This whole package is now called “Regionalism” – because it proposes six strong ‘Regions’.

    All these ideas have now been condensed into the Yoruba Agenda for the National Conference which is therefore the MANDATE for all Yoruba persons at the National Conference. In fact, the decision was taken at the Ibadan Conferences that anyYoruba delegate who betrays the Yoruba Agenda at the National Conference should not return home to Yorubaland. It is that binding.

    At the National Conference, then, we have a Yoruba leadership and a Yoruba Agenda, both broadly backed by the Yoruba nation. Furthermore, back home in Yorubaland, and among the millions of Yoruba people in the Diaspora, there has solidified a consensus that we Yoruba will contribute our very best to the reviving of Nigeria (and therefore to the success of this National Conference), but that, if resistance to change and improvement in Nigeria should continue to be impossible to overcome, then we would not continue to be part of a chaotic, corruption-ridden, poverty-generating, and blood-drenched Nigeria.

    So, the Yoruba delegates at the National Conference are fully aware of their duty – and of their enormous support from home. Therefore, we all have the right to expect that they will do their duty to Nigeria, and thereby, to their Yoruba nation. And if they do that diligently and help Nigeria to make a resounding success of the National Conference, they would become some of the immortal heroes from the successful National Conference.

    Similar stories are true of most of the nationalities of Nigeria. The hope, therefore, is high that Nigeria will begin to experience very important changes soon – and begin to grow and prosper.

    Happily, the news from Abuja is that the Yoruba delegation is working hard towards its destiny. They have been meeting regularly and building cohesion. Not surprisingly, there are some of them who were inclined initially to promote partisan or sectional objectives, and who were cool initially towards some features of the Yoruba Agenda – such as regionalism, or the replacement of the presidential system with a parliamentary system. For various reasons, they would have wanted significant parts of the status quo in Nigeria to remain. But, fortunately, they are few, and they have gradually yielded to the logic of the Yoruba Agenda.

    Even more importantly, the Yoruba delegation is stretching out its hands towards other delegations. Days before the National Conference opened, the Yoruba leaders, and leaders of the South-south and South-east, had met for two days in Asaba and agreed to a common agenda very similar to the Yoruba Agenda. The delegates of these three zones continue to meet in Abuja, and making contacts with delegates from the Middle Belt and the far North, and the chances look good now that the Asaba accord could serve as the instrument for restructuring our federation and setting our country on the path to stability and progress.

    In summary, then, I can see the probability that some men and women of my Yoruba nation could soon count among the front-line immortals who saved Nigeria. For the rest of us Yoruba people, our duty is clear – support and encourage our delegates, and never leave them alone until victory is won

  • ‘National Conference must be subjected to referendum’ 

    Ohanaeze Ndigbo Anambra State chapter has said the ongoing National Conference should have been subjected to a referendum first for Nigerians to decide the outcome.

    President Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Anambra State, Chief Chris Eluemunor spoke while addressing journalists in Onitsha.

    He said: “The conference should have been one step at a time and at the end, they will make recommendation to the Presidency. We want a referendum on the decisions of the National Conference and if that referendum is acceptable to Nigerians, it will help the entire country. You don’t need to push it to the National Assembly for ratification.

    Ohanaeze Ndigbo boss stated: “The President did make a promise. He has actualised his promise. He has done a lot of things to show that he is very interested in the National Conference. First of all, I have to commend him for taking such a bold step. What Igbo are saying for now is that after 100 years of amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates, we need to talk because the exercise was imposed on nations that make up Nigeria today.

    “It was not voluntary. Therefore, after 100 years of amalgamation, we need to sit down and talk on how to move the country forward. We are interested in the unity of this country; nobody wants Nigeria to break up. But what Ndigbo are saying is that there must be equity and fairness in the administration of this country.

    “First, there has to be an equal state representation in the country. Right now the Southeast geo-political zone has only five states while the other zones have six states each.

    “The Igbo is a major nation in Nigeria that cannot be marginalised. The distribution of wealth in the country has to be discussed. There has to be equitable distribution of wealth in Nigeria. Some Igbo states are involved in oil producing. Anambra State has joined the oil-producing states.

    Elumunor said it is not enough to go for a conference whose outcome is not implementable. This is the fear a lot of people are having.

    On alleged plans by Mr President to use the conference for his re-election bid, the Ohanaeze Ndigbo boss said: “The conference has nothing to do with his political ambition. If anything, it is going to work against him because I know that some parts of the country are not interested in the ongoing National Conference and they may not support him because of this. But any reasonable mind knows that the President has good intentions for this country by allowing this conference to take place. It has nothing to do with his political ambition. Meanwhile he has not even told anybody that he is running for the 2015 general elections. But even if he is running what about it! He is still working within the limit of his tenure. Whether he is running in 2015 or not is neither here nor there.

     

  • National Conference and the Muslim question

    National Conference and the Muslim question

    The alleged marginalisation of Muslims at the ongoing National Conference took a different dimension last week as Muslims in the country protested and brought the matter to the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    The head of Muslim faith in Nigeria, the Sultan of Sokoto Alhaji Sa’ad Abubakar III led other Muslim leaders to protest the composition of the conference, which they alleged was undemocratic and unfair to them.

    The Secretary-General of the Nigeria Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, who spoke with State House correspondents at the end of the closed-door meeting with President Goodluck Jonathan, said: “We came to consult with Mr. President. We are happy we consulted with him, and he has given us reasons to re-assure the Muslims that Muslims in Nigeria are not deliberately marginalised. He has asked us to convey the feelings of the government, the genuineness of the government, the fairness of government to the entire populace.

    “That if there are issues that are not as they ought to be, they were not definitely deliberate and we want to believe that Mr. President told us his mind. We also want to believe that it is proper to protest. It is also proper to assume that a leader will always be just even if there are mistakes thereafter.

    “We just felt we must convey the feelings of the Muslims in Nigeria to Mr. President and he has given us his words to re-assure the Muslim community that he is a genuine and committed Christian who will not be unjust to others.”

    Before the latest protest to the Presidential Villa last week, another Muslim group, the Jama’atu Nasril Islam (JNI) had, a week earlier, opposed the composition of the National Conference, claiming that Muslims in the country are being marginalised as the number of Christians at the conference is more than the number of Muslims.

    The Secretary-General of JNI, Dr. Khalid Abubakar Aliyu said: “Although democracy is a game of numbers, this has not been respected. For instance, while Muslims constitute the majority in the country, Christians, who by all acceptable records are not more than 40 per cent of the country’s population, ironically constitute 62 per cent of the total delegates.

    “We regard it as disrespect to the conscience of the Muslims that, of the 20 delegates of the Federal Government, only six are Muslims. No Muslim is deemed fit to make the list of delegates from the Nigerian Economic Summit.

    “In fact, in the representation of the security agencies, Muslims have been so unimaginably short-changed with only one Muslim out of the six retired military and security personnel, one out of six retired security and the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) officers, and two out of delegates of the Association of Retired Police Officers. This means, of the 18 security experts belonging to these three groups, only 4 (22.2%) are Muslims.

    “The question is: why is this serious short-changing of Muslims in these very sensitive groups?”

    The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), however, faulted the claims by JNI that Muslims in Nigeria are more than Christians.

    The General-Secretary of CAN, Dr. Musa Asake, in a statement, said: “CAN needs to remind JNI of the argument and refusal of Muslims to include religion during the last census in Nigeria. We appeal to JNI not to use religion as a basis for their reservations about the National Conference. We believe the conference will do Nigeria a lot of good.

    “The JNI should come out with the figures that make Muslim population more than that of Christians. We in CAN will boycott future census in Nigeria beginning with that of 2016 if they do not include religion. Enough is enough!

    “We are therefore challenging the Secretary-General of the JNI to make it public the source of his population figures which shows that Christians constitute only 40 per cent of the country’s population.”

    The conference, which aimed at charting a new path for Nigeria and address grievances and imbalances in the country, no doubt, seems to have started on a wrong note with religious sentiments being brought to the fore rather than focusing on the objectives for which it was convened.

    The voting method to be adopted at the conference has also become a source of division among the delegates. While some groups are pushing for three-quarter majority for any resolution to go through, others are supporting two-third majority or simple majority.

    Some Christian delegates have also kicked against the use of short opening Islamic prayers by Muslim delegates at the conference. They threatened to shout “Praise the Lord” or make short Christian prayers before making their remarks if the Muslims are not called to order.

    Even as many stakeholders had kicked against the conference before it started, one hopes that drastic steps will be taken now so that the conference will not leave the country more divided than it was before the conference started.

  • National Confab: FG asks court to dismiss suit challenging legitimacy

    The Federal Government Monday urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to dismiss a suit by rights activist, Tunji Abayomi, challenging President Goodluck Jonathan’s powers to convene the on-going National Conference.

    The government, in a notice of preliminary objection it filed, argued that the plaintiff lacked the locus standi to initiate the suit. It also queried the court’s jurisdiction to hear the suit.

    Aside  challenging the convocation of the conference, Abayomi also prayed the court to declare it as null and void.

    Listed as defendants in the suit include the Federal Government, Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), the Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the conference, and its Secretary.

    The lawyer to the FG and AGF, Femi Falana (SAN) argued that the court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the case because the plaintiff, aside lacking the right to initiate the suit, disclosed no cause of action against the defendants.

    He added that the President has the constitutional powers to convene the conference.

    Falana urged the court to hear his objection with the plaintiff’s originating summons to prevent undue delay, a request the trial judge, Justice Abdulkadir Abdulkafarati granted

    The presiding judge, Justice Abdul Kafarati granted the order.

    Abayomi told the court that the conference’s Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary have been served with court processes.

    It is his contention that the President lacked the powers to convene the conference without an authorizing legislation from the National Assembly.

    The Senate President, Speaker of the House of Representatives and other defendants were  not represented in court yesterday. They also did not file any response.

    The court has adjourned to May 8 for hearing.