As criticism continues to trail the quit notice issued by some Northern Youth for Igbos to vacate the North within three months and subsequent support by Spokesman of Northern Elders Forum, Professor Ango Abdullahi, the Northern Youth Council of Nigeria (NYCN) has called on the federal government to extend its arrest order to the professor.
The group which addressed a world press conference in Kaduna on Saturday noted that, should there be any crisis as a result of uncivil declaration by some reckless youths who failed to weigh the implications of such sensitive matter on the economic and socio-political consequences, Ango Abdullahi and his family will fly out of the country and leave the innocent to pay with their blood.
President, NYCN Isah Abubakar said, the Kaduna Declaration’ does not in any way represent the collective voice or decision of any legitimate coalition of youth groups from the region as the council remains the apex youth organization that hikds right to announce any resolution of youths from the region.
The group, which plainly dessociated itself from the declaration said Nigeria remain one indivisible entity reiterating that, any Nigerian citizen, has the right to live and own property anywhere he or she chooses to reside without fear from other fellow citizens.
Isah, who expressed worry that when the country is working very hard to retrace its step to good governance, some were busy trying to frustrate that effort by well meaning Nigeria especially, President Mohammadu Buhari and his Vice Professor Yemi Osinbajo.
According to him, “we are surprise with statement credited to our renown elder and academic, Professor Ango Abdullahi supporting the uncivil and illegal declaration that Igbos should vacate the North.
“NYCN want to use this medium to dissociate itself from anti-Nigeria agenda for selfish reason. We are not happy with the development in all its ramifications.
“We are calling on federal government to extend its arrest order to Professor Ango Abdullahi and other people who must have sponsored the perpetrators of such a huge inciting statement capable of throng the country into another civil unrest while the country is yet to fully recovered from the previous one several decades after”, he said.
Tag: national
-

Northern Council to FG: Arrest Ango Abdullahi now
-
May 29 and national question
As has been the practice since 1999 when Obasanjo and the military institutionalised May 29, as ‘democracy day’, a move many Nigerians believe is a subterfuge to wish away the crisis of nationhood they had heightened with their misadventure into politics in January 1966, the celebration came up once again on Monday. The periodic hollow ritual which unfortunately has no bearing with the nation’s struggle for participatory democratic process has also been dismissed by many Nigerians including civil society groups as a a celebration of the perfidy and tragic consequences of 33 years of military misadventure that destroyed our multi-party system, our political socialization process and our social organization leaving behind an unworkable unitary superstructure and a new breed of politicians that breed nothing but corruption
Speaking at the interdenominational church service to mark the day at the National Christian Centre in Abuja four days ago, acting President Yemi Osinbajo urged Nigerians to make sacrifices for Nigeria’s greatness drawing a parallel between the Biblical story of the good Samaritan and our self-serving politicians. Apostle Popoola, the presiding apostle of the Word Communication Ministries and founder of Christ Family Assembly Churches, who ministered during the service however struck the nail on its head by reminding us that 100 years after the amalgamation of the North and the South, the country could not continue to blame the imperialists for our crisis of nationhood. His advice to government, which like its predecessors has continued to play the ostrich despite making resolution of the national question a campaign issue during the election campaigns, is a revisit of the 2014 National Conference report which made some attempts at addressing our crisis of nationhood.
The Acting President must be reminded that our crisis of nationhood has nothing to do with the people. President Buhari, his principal affirmed this much during last year’s celebration of the hollow ritual when he declared “Despite the many years of hardship and disappointment the people of this nation have proved inherently good, industrious tolerant, patient and generous”. It similarly has nothing to do with the economy, one of the major pursuits of the Buhari’s government. Our major problem is politics. We cannot win the economic battle without first winning the political battle. An attempt to put the cart before the horse by our successive hypocritical governments since 1964 has only provided additional incentive for those benefitting from our nightmare to continue to hold the nation hostage.
The successive military regimes in particular have since 1966 done everything including plunging the nation into an avoidable civil war that led to the loss of about two million lives except address the core issue of crisis of nationhood- which is about how our multiethnic, multi-cultural and multi religious society can live together in harmony and develop at their own pace without interference from the federating units.
People and nationalities are products of their environments. The military and its apologists forget that Britain with hostile environment where life was once ‘nasty brutish and short’ thrives in the exploitation of weaker cultures using her wits, Germany on the culture of industry of her people, and France on her liberalism and celebration of the infinite goodness of man. Run Britain, Germany, France, Turkey and Afghanistan with our own type of military imposed unitary constitution, with Turks and Afghans performing the role of local policing in Germany, France and Britain, what they will be confronted with is the same type of social dislocations currently afflicting our own multi-ethnic society. They will also have the equivalents of our self-serving warlords in Abuja who, answerable to none but to themselves came up with privatization and monetization; policies that allowed their members and their families to confiscate national assets built through the sweat and blood of the poor. There will be Afghan and Turks herdsmen who like our own Fulani herdsmen that justify killing, maiming and confiscation of farmer’s territories across Nigeria on the basis of a military-doctored constitution, will roam freely from Istanbul to Paris, tending their flock. Of course there will also be street hawkers turned millionaires to contest the ownership of the Queen’s royal palaces.
However, to forestall culture clash, and prevent the chaos that have come to define our own co-existence since the deliberate sabotage of our independence constitution in 1962, Europe had after two devastating world wars resolved their crisis of nationhood by embracing federalism- a social philosophy which strives to liberate individuals and groups from the tyranny of the state and democracy, a governmental process or a method that guarantee self-actualisation of people within a community.
President Buhari and the APC, if they wish to be remembered by history, still have two years to address the national question. All that is required is the political will. As a democratically elected President, Buhari remains a sovereign for the next two years. As a democratic sovereign in control of awesome apparatus of state power, he has a limitless power to implement his campaign promises He is unstoppable by political foes.
Since democracy is nothing but a method that gives the sovereign a free hand to either deploy constitutional means, liberal strategies or even absolute power to effect changes in society, President Buhari and APC are not being asked to invent the wheel. They have examples of nations such as Malaysia, China, Russia, India and even the USA where reigning democratic sovereigns at different periods in their history adopted any or a combination of the above democratic methods they deemed appropriate for fulfilling their contractual electoral obligations to those who voted them into power. Such electoral promises include but not limited to liberating their people from poverty as we had in Malaysia, India, China or promoting political elite greed as we had under Bush that threw America into two avoidable wars in order to create jobs by utilizing arms piled up in American warehouses; and Donald Trump whose chief economist, Gary Cohn told reporters after signing an unprecedented arms deal with Saudi Arabia that ‘the goal of the $350b arms deal, is ‘to invest a lot of money in the US and have a lot of US companies invest and build thing over here”. It counts for little that the development will prolong the nightmare of people in the Arab world.
The challenge of Buhari and APC in implementing their contractual promise to Nigerian electorate is not time. It is whether they have the political will. The beauty of democracy is that Buhari as a democratically elected sovereign is invincible until he is replaced by another democratically elected sovereign. It is only his successor who, if he has the support of the people, that can attempt to undo whatever Buhari decides to do within the next two years the same way Donald Trump is today trying to undo Obama policies such as ‘Obamacare’, Obama immigration policies, and his Middle-East as well as his NATO and climate change policies, all within his first 150 days in office.
-
apbn bemoans non-involvement of professionals in national development
Last week, the Association of Professional Bodies of Nigeria (APBN) held its presidential retreat in Asaba-the Delta State Capital.
The 3-day retreat, which was attended by over thirty professional bodies from across the federation, had as its theme, “Roles of Professionals in the Economic Recovery and Growth”.
The retreat featured paper presentation by renowned professionals from different sectors of the Nigerian economy.
Delta Deputy Governor, Kingsley Utuaro, who declared the event open in an address admonished participants to cooperate with government at all levels in shouldering the task of economic recovery and growth.
Utuaro was represented by Executive Assistant, (Boundary Matters), Chief Gweke Akudihor.
He praised APBN for organizing the event stressing, “That this gathering is timely and long overdue considering the economic constraints, unfriendly regulatory policies, lack of professional touch to drive the economy, falling Naira rate, lack of consistency and continuity has led to the impoverishment of the Nation’s economy”.
He bemoaned the lack of involvement of professionals to redirect the economy, stressing that their wealth of experience is required to salvage the Nigerian economy.
He said the State government has through its SMART agenda revitalized the various entrepreneurial skills acquisition for unemployed, adding that it has also encouraged the establishment of various self-sustainable jobs for her unemployed.
President, APBN, Dr. Omede Idris said the retreat was an annual capacity building program for the leadership member bodies of the association, stressing that the event “is a conscious effort to appreciate and address perceived limitation in our professional organization and pratices”.
He said the themes and subthemes were carefully crafted to cover most or all aspect of our economies, professions and polity, adding this will further “stimulate our thoughts, interactions and contribution to nation building.
He said the retreat will proffer recommendations on ways government can partner and collaborate with individual professional associations with its high pool of professional resources and competences while serving the interest of Nigeria and Nigerians.
Olutoyin Ayinde, Nigerian Institute of Town Planners, in a paper titled – “Developing Sustainable Human Settlements: Organise or Agonise”, examined the non-involvement of professionals in national development.
Ayinde said Nigeria has over 840 urban centres with well over 10 cities with populations of over a million…In another decade, four additional cities will qualify as mega-cities, adding that most of them are unplanned and undergoing degradation.
He said the “inevitable result of neglecting physical or urban planning is chaos in the settlement system”, stressing that this neglect is demonstrated in the failure of the physical and economic infrastructure of the Nigerian State.
According to him, “No economy has ever grown to maturity if the human settlements fundamentals to development are dysfunctional or unorganised, because unsustainable human settlements and economic development are inversely related just as poor management and development are mutually exclusive.”
He argued that the problem with Nigeria is not a lack of resources but inadequate planning and bad management of resources for the development of human settlements.
Tony Agenmonmen, President, National Institute of Marketing of Nigeria, in his paper titled, “Promoting Locally Made Products as Strategy for Recovery and Growth: The role of Marketing Professionals posited that under the prevailing economic climate, promoting locally made products was crucial, adding that it will stimulate the economy ,while strengthening local business and conserve foreign exchange.
According to Agenmonmen, while the efforts of some state governments in promoting locally made products are laudable, there is still the need for proper product presentation in order for locally made products to gain increased visibility, acceptance and patronage.
He noted that the present economic situation presents an opportunity for local products to thrive if only their presentations conform to defined standards, and their unique selling points efficiently communicated to an identified target audience through the various promotional tools.
-
National mining exhibition coming
The National Mining Summit titled: ConMin West Africa has been planned to hold on June 13 at the International Conference Centre, Abuja.
In a statement, the Manager in charge of the exhibition Jamie Pearson stated that the exhibition is aimed at assisting the sector’s development, through ensuring that all key stakeholders from across the supply chain were present. ‘’It will enable for businesses to connect with policy makers and financiers. Furthermore, with the sector in its infancy – the organisers have allowed for an important mix of international players from countries where mining is far more advanced to offer case studies and advice,’’ he said.
He listed experts being expected at the events to include Minister Mosebenzi Joseph Zwane, minister from South Africa; Minister Dan Kazungu from Kenya; Monsieur Hassane Baraze Moussa, Ministre Des Mines, Niger and Paul Lehman, the High Commissioner of Australia to Nigeria.
The events would also feature eminent personalities, such as Dr. Toni Aubynn, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Ghana Minerals Commission; Ms Yewande Sadiku, Executive Secretary, Nigerian Investment Promotion Council and Mr. Oscar Onyeama, the CEO of Nigeria’s Stock Exchange (NSE). These experts, he said, would speak be on topics, such as Transparency and Sustainability, to Geological Data Generation and Mineral Prospectivity.
The exhibition is expected to be attended by companies exhibiting from across the construction and solid minerals industries. The conference running alongside the exhibition will be focused on construction with technical sessions held by exhibitors and leading brands and more general sessions including insurance of construction programmes and financing projects.
Visitors will be able to hear from leading industry experts on these pertinent topics, while also discovering new technologies, greeting potential partners and generating business for their firms.
The summit, which will be held under the auspices of the Ministry of Solid Minerals, in partnership with Deloitte Consulting is endorsed by the NSE; FOCI; VDMA. It is being sponsored by Total and Soetec Engineering Limited, among others.
-

Fed Govt mulls national carrier
Nigeria has appointed advisers to help it set up a national airline and develop its aviation infrastructure currently seen as a barrier to economic growth to create a hub for West Africa, junior aviation minister Hadi Sirika said yesterday.
Sirika said a group of six firms including German carrier Lufthansa would advise the government on setting up an airline, an aviation leasing company and a maintenance hangar and on creating concessions to run the country’s airports.
A cabinet meeting presided over by Vice President YemiOsinbajo had approved N1.52 billion ($4.99 million) of funding for the project, he added.
President Muhammadu Buhari, who promised a national airline when campaigning for election, did not attend the weekly meeting, fueling concerns about the state of his health.
Decades of neglect and lack of investment have left Nigeria with low-quality infrastructure that is seen as a hurdle to prosperity and the government has already said that upgrading it will require private investment.
The government set up a committee on establishing a national airline in 2015, in fulfillment of the campaign promises which brought Buhari’s All Progressive Congress (APC) to power.
An APC transition paper seen by Reuters in 2015 had proposed merging a dozen debt-laden airlines on the books of state-owned “bad bank” AMCON into a single carrier that would partner with a global airline to serve the West and Central African region.
The single carrier would include Nigeria’s biggest airline, Arik Air, which AMCON took over in February.
AMCON has said it has no plans to convert Arik into a national carrier and that the government has no interest in doing so other than to ensure that the airline continues to fly.
-
Please, review National Automobile Policy
I deign to begin this article by making oblique reference to your well-researched piece published in The Nation, February 26th, 2017 with the title: ‘Vehicles import ban: It’s business as usual.’ That piece, to say the least, was very informative and deserves commendation. That said, I wish to state here that a careful perusal of the different policy pronouncements of the President Muhammadu Buhari-led administration in the last 18 months shows that nothing much has really changed in the way government works, especially if one takes a very dispassionate look at the policy matrix of government in terms of its objective purpose.
For the avoidance of doubt and confusion, a few examples would suffice here. Take the recent ban on the importation of vehicles through the land borders announced on 5th December 2016 and whose implementation began 1st January 2017, that policy has clearly shown that this government lacks tact and diplomacy.
I dare say that the outright ban of vehicles through the borders is not just a kneel-jerk approach to issues but does appear to be a hand-wriggling gesture by a government utterly confused about how to handle a less complex problem at hand.
Clearly, rather than rely on executive fiat or brute force as the case may be, a more holistic approach which recognises the unintended consequences of state policies should be readily adopted.
No policy(s) of government, however well-meaning, should be injurious to the socio-economic, physical and psychological wellbeing of the people to whom such a policy(s) was intended in the first place.
However, before I go any further, at this juncture, I wager that it would be most appropriate to take a short historical excursion into what actually led to the new policy regime banning vehicle import across the land borders.
The last administration, it may be recalled, had initiated a new automotive policy that raised the duty paid on imported vehicles from 20 percent to 70 percent, covering 35 percent duty and 35 percent levy, effective from 2014.
The policy was aimed at discouraging importation and increase patronage for locally assembled cars. It may, however, interest you to note that that policy from all intent and purpose has been totally counterproductive, to say the least. The reason being that the policy favours just a few to the detriment of the vast majority, whose livelihoods and businesses depend solely on import, especially car dealers who buy between 5-10 cars, make small margins and continue the cycle.
With a few exceptions, especially PAN Nigeria Limited, the leading manufacturer of automobiles in Nigeria, assembling Peugeot vehicles has an installed capacity to produce 90,000 cars per annum in three shifts with ample space for future expansion and can generate direct employment for over 5000 people. The PAN model is a good one to follow but unfortunately that has not been so with many of the assembling plants. For instance, investigations revealed that some of the assembling companies camouflaged under the processes and import almost a readymade vehicle that may not necessarily require engaging the kind of manpower the government wishes they would engage in the first place. Aside being a loss of revenue for the federal government as they may not get what would have accrued to them as taxes and levies, it appears a disservice, deception to Nigerians.
Of what benefit then is the less than 10% importation levy on the completely knocked down parts (CKD) and the semi knocked down parts (SKD) given as rebate for these companies to provide jobs for Nigerians, particularly the youth? While not making a case for importers of readymade vehicles who import and paid 70% on their imported vehicles, it is feared that this imbalance may not bring anything positive to the Nigerian economy both in the short term and on the long run.
Going forward, what the government needs to do therefore is to first consider tinkering with the subsisting automotive policy and weigh in on it because the policy as it is presently implemented is a disincentive to business both in the short, medium to long term.
More than that, there is a serious need for the reorientation of the officers and men of the Nigerian Customs Service, who are expected to enforce most of these policies in question. They are human after all and hence can be malleable as past experience has shown.
Methinks that if the federal government takes a step further and scrap the high import duty regime imposed on vehicles by the administration of President Jonathan in 2013 and return the import duties on vehicles to 20 percent from the prohibitive 70 percent tariff imposed by the former administration, the reversal will serve as an incentive for Nigerians to import legitimately through the seaports and make appropriate payments to government.
Adeyemi Timothy
Abuja.
-

Reps: Fears over National Roads Fund Bill
NIGERIANS are hungry, the economy is in shambles, inflation has wafted into space, many merely exist, hanging unto life sometimes with only one square meal a day, sometimes nothing; the price of kerosene is so high that citizens are considering cooking with petrol. Things are terrible, many are saying. Smile Nigerians, for the worst is yet to come. When evil is crafted, it comes in seemingly positive packages. That is what the National Roads Bill, 2017 is: a black package painted White.
The Technical Committee for the Review of the Roads Funds Bill headed by Chris Okoye recently submitted its report to the Hon. Toby Okechukwu- headed House Committee on Works. The report is to be reviewed by the Works Committee and submitted to the House for consideration and adoption. Hopefully, it will not be passed and the recomemdations trashed.
The idea behind the Bill itself is not bad. The National Roads Fund is to help in the funding, maintenance and administration of the road network in Nigeria when established.
Note however that it is also to serve as a repository of revenues from road user-related charges (repeat: Road User Related Charges) and other sources for financing to be managed and administered for routine and periodic maintenance works on Nigerian roads.
But what many people are quarreling with are the recommendations of the technical committee, which invariable will end up hurting the ordinary people that the lawmakers have sworn to represent well.
The technical committee said there is the need to garner at least a N100 billion per annum for the national roads fund, and recommended “fuel levy of N5 chargeable per litre on any volume of petrol and diesel products imported into Nigeria and on locally refined petroleum products.”
According to the committee, other sources of funds include: toll fees not exceeding 10 percent of any revenue paid as user charge per vehicle on any federal road designated as a toll road; international vehicle transit charges; inter-state mass transit user charge of 0.5 percent deductible from the fare paid by passengers as well as surcharge of 0.5 percent chargeable on the assessed value of any imported vehicle into the country.”
The worry is that the cost of all the charges will definitely percolate to the common Nigerians who are already heavily burdened with a host of costs they cannot afford.
One of the cardinal responsibilities of lawmakers in the National Assembly is to guard the interest of their constituents to ensure that all is well with them. In this wise, it seems apt to say they should be able to discern any hovering wisp of evil couched in shiny legislative apparels- and stop it at the level of infancy.
The question might well be asked: Is the National Assembly aware of the pains of the people? Definitely! Recently, the House of Representatives passed a motion that it will set up a tactical committee on the biting economic recession.
While speaking on a motion sponsored by two members, Hon. Orker-Jev Emmanuel and Hon. Segun Alexander Adekola recently, Orker-Jev said: “The House of Representatives wing of the National Assembly is charged with the functions of representing the people, making laws for the order and good governance of the country, checking the actions of the executive arm and its Ministries, Departments and Agencies and controlling the finances of the State;
“In carrying out these functions, members cannot claim to be oblivious of the hardships Nigerians currently face as a result of the sky-rocketing prices of foodstuff, transportation, petroleum products and other essential commodities, which have left children, women and the common man worse hit.”
So, if members are aware of the terrible situation that the common Nigerians are in, why make life more miserable for them?
It is also apt to recall that during a hearing by the Hon. Raphael Nnanna Igbokwe- headed House of Representatives ad hoc committee on the review of the pump price of petrol recently, the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) and the National Commercial Tricycle and Motorcycle Owners and Riders Association (NACTOMORAS) said the government should not only halt any bid to add to the pump price of petroleum products, but even return to the previous pump price of N87 per litre of petrol.
The associations while making presentations before the ad hoc committee said in spite of all the increases in petrol pump price, the country has ended up with “bad roads, power failure, unemployment, poverty, as well as medical care deterioration and high inflation of essential commodities.”
The President of NURTW, Alhaji Najeem Usman Yasin, who was represented by Mercy Ibeh (legal department) said no to any planned hike in pump price and said the association rather prefers a downward review of the petrol price.
“NURTW is not in support and will not support any attempt at increasing the pump price beyond the current one,” the association said.
The National President of NACTOMORAS, Alhaji Muhd Sani Hassan in his presentation said: “We write to object, reject and disagree with any plan or move to increase the pump price of PMS fuel, without leniency, sympathy or consideration of the already depleted economic realities currently being experienced in the country.”
From the arguments above, it seems evident that the passage of the National Roads Fund Bill with its onerous recommendations will set the National Assembly against Nigerians. That, obviously, is the last thing on the lawmakers’ minds.
-
Time to set national priorities
•If the Buhari government is to make its impact felt before 2019
Virtually all the challenges Nigeria has been grappling with for several years have spilled into the New Year largely unresolved.
Power supply remains fitful, crippling industry and impairing social life. Where manufacturing is not at a standstill, it is shrinking. Unemployment, especially among the younger population, remains scandalously high. The road network lies in acute disrepair. Spiralling costs have rendered off-limits goods and services that the average citizen could afford. The railways are still mired in the mid-20th Century.
But it has not been bad news all round. Agricultural production has increased significantly, but has not translated into lower food prices. Trucking produce from the farm to the market over cratered roads imposes significant costs. Much of the produce, especially fruits, rot away for lack of proper storage, resulting in losses to producer and consumer alike. Moribund river basin schemes have been revived to boost agriculture and fishing.
Refining capacity is on the uptick, but interruptions and rumours of interruptions of fuel supplies persist, as does talk of a “subsidy” that must be ended again if continuous supplies are to be guaranteed.
Recruitment of 100, 000 graduates nationwide to teach in various institutions and the same number into the Nigeria Police Force are positive steps to reduce unemployment. Various schemes aimed at empowering tens of thousands of Nigerians for self-employment have also been established.
The first phase of a social intervention scheme to reduce poverty took off recently with the payment of a stipend of N5,000 to indigent citizens in nine states, in keeping with an election campaign promise of the governing All Progressives Congress (APC). When fully implemented, a million Nigerians will profit from the scheme.
Questions have been raised about the criteria for selecting beneficiaries, and about the scheme’s sustainability. Good intentions are not enough. The authorities should address these questions to enlist public support for the scheme.
And with the establishment in the recent past of more public universities, access to higher education is being widened even as some of the older universities that had earned international recognition have lost rank.
The time has come to place a moratorium on the establishment of new public universities, especially when the existing ones are notoriously poorly funded. Resources should instead be concentrated on raising standards in the older universities to world class.
On the national security front, Boko Haram has been tamed, thanks to a military finally equipped for the task. Crushing it must be the ineluctable goal.
But the menace of “Fulani cattle herders” has become bloodier and more intractable. The carnage that turned swathes of Plateau State into killing fields is now being enacted in Kaduna State and areas as far south as Rivers State and Ogun State, with points between just as vulnerable.
It has been claimed that the ECOWAS protocol guarantees the herders free movement throughout the region. But it certainly does not grant them the right to destroy farmlands, raze entire communities and kill with impunity just to graze their cattle.
Whether they are foreigners or Nigerians, their depredations must be seen as clear and present threats to national security. The government’s primary obligation is to protect the lives and property of the citizenry against any threat from any quarters. The Federal Government should rise and be seen to rise to that challenge, urgently.
Overall, much has been done. But there is so much more to do, and so little time. Already, legislators at all three tiers of government and members of the political class are grouping and re-grouping to form a “mega party” that will supplant the present administration in the general elections scheduled for 2019. As the year progresses, this is likely to be the consuming passion of the mega-party proponents.
The government on its part will feel impelled to devise and implement strategies to thwart those seeking to supplant it, and to secure its own continuity.
Such a development will be a costly distraction the nation cannot afford.
The government must keep its eyes on the agenda on which it was voted into power. It is impossible to achieve before 2019 positive change on the comprehensive scale spelled out in its election manifesto. The government will therefore have to identify as priorities those areas in which it can make lasting change and then deploy resources there, without prejudice to other areas of need.
Three obvious candidates for the list are electricity and water, and roads. Major improvements in these areas will translate into resuscitation of manufacturing and small scale industries, healthier living, health, improved agricultural productivity, as well as faster and safer movement of persons, goods and services.
-

National resolution for 2017 and beyond (2)
While our primary challenge as a nation is the weakness of institutional structures, there is hardly a doubt that this is itself linked to our cultural predilection for misplaced priorities in the arena of values. When our warped values endorse, but institutions condemn, to us, that’s just too bad for institutions. That is how we have carried on, at least in the last thirty something years.
Consider the following personal narrative which I had shared in this column before. After successfully completing the Secondary Modern School in December 1960, and not having secured admission for further education, I was hired as a pupil teacher by the late Chief I. A. Adelodun, the headmaster of First Baptist School, Isia, Okeho, to teach his class because, as headmaster, he had assigned himself a class while he was also an Honourable Member of the Western Region House of Assembly. He paid my salary of £5 per month from his pocket.
I would like to highlight a few salient points from this story. First, membership of parliaments in the First Republic was not considered a full-time job and members were expected to keep their day jobs. How they managed the two was between them and their conscience on the one hand, and between them and their constituencies on the other. But where any of them might have a weak conscience, their constituencies did not let them get away with cheating.
Second, because of the combination of a strong conscience on the part of many of those legislators and political appointees and uncompromising constituencies who monitored them, the values of hard work and honesty were preserved. Therefore, when in those days, we taught children J. F. Odunjo’s immortal lines “Ise logun ise” (work is the antidote to poverty), it resonated with them. When we taught them the lyrics “Bi mo ba ka we mi, bata mi a ro koko ka...” (If I am well-read, I am on the road to comfort), they were motivated, for they were witnesses to the stories of “rag to riches” because of education.
Third, however, those values have suffered disastrously in the face of newly discovered vices of indolence, dishonesty and selfish greed that have unfortunately been promoted and celebrated as modern values. A headmaster could not have done otherwise than Chief Adelodun did in those days. His conscience would not allow him even if he wanted. And the parents and school authorities would not have condoned an absentee teacher.
Now, however, we have some headmasters without other official jobs not only absenting themselves from their stations, but also condoning teacher absences. We have teachers seated in their boutiques three days a week at the expense of their students and getting paid at the end of the month. Far more serious is the contemporary phenomena of ghost teachers and ghost workers. We have evolved tragically in our embrace of greed and dishonesty as a new national value. And it appears we are not letting prudential considerations obstruct our dangerous sprint toward the edge of the cliff.
Fourth, but who are we to blame the crooked tail when the head is itself wobbly? The teacher in his classroom, the headmistress in her office and the clerk in his cubicle, are all variants of a mini iromi. They all dance to despicable beats coming from the drums of selfish greed and economic sabotage. It’s surreal. Legislators pass bills for their self-aggrandisement. They vote to give themselves raises even when they know that there are no funds to repair roads or provide potable water for their constituencies. They allocate to themselves funds for constituency projects but heaven helps anyone that tries to find the location of such projects in the constituencies. In the age of twitter and snapchat, the teacher, the headmaster and the clerk are very much aware of what’s going on in the corridors of power. They are naturally, therefore, cynical about sermons that tell them to be the change they want to see.
Fifth, as a corporate entity, we have lived our entire life spending beyond our means with an insatiable appetite for borrowing to finance our flamboyant lifestyle. We have never cut our national coat according to the size of our clothes. And because our productivity has not met up with, let alone overtake our consumption, we are in constant debt to other nations from which we import to satisfy our wants.
Though we can live comfortably without much of what we import, our vulgar wants must be fulfilled. And the big ones among us are in the lead for these desires of the flesh. So, the driver is an insider to the boss’ lifestyle and he cannot wait to have what Oga has. What course is open to him? Theft or conspiracy to kidnap Oga’s kids! In the economies that we envy, individuals go about in jeans and T-shirts, while saving for education, home, nutritious food and vacation. We go into debt for aso-ebi.
Sixth, while there are certain cultural values that have been passed on to us from our forebears and which we rightly think of as morally obligated of us to continue, we have, without much thought, taken them to insane heights. Naming of newly born, wedding and funeral represent the three most important landmarks of a person worthy of celebration. But while tradition recognises this, it does not impose on us an obligation to go into debt in recognising them. Unfortunately, this is what many folks have done, cheered on by the rest of us. We make feferity, apology to the late Chief Anthony Enahoro, our cultural pride, without the necessary constraint to rein in its excesses.
Seventh, meanwhile, we hold government responsible for our normal parental responsibilities without even bothering to do our part. Besides civil servants and private sector employees, who are forced to part with taxable portions of their incomes through the PAYEE system, it is only a few conscientious ones that pay taxes these days because we assume that there is oil revenue to take care of our national wants. And when there is lull in the oil market giving rise to recession, we grumble.
Eighth, as citizens, we aid and abet corruption with our inordinate and greedy demands from government and from candidates and elected officials. It is a rational law of economics that one invests to make profit. Therefore, when the electorate demand and receive gratification from candidates to give the candidates their support rather than support their positions on issues which would benefit them in return, those candidates are rational to consider the bribe they give voters as investment from which they must make reasonable profit. Do we then really have a good reason to complain when on getting to office, those elected officials dip their hands in the coffers of government?
Ninth, from the immediate prior paragraph, it seems clear that big-time corruption, the type that involves politicians in 10 figure theft of public funds, has its root in the petty corruption initiated by the electorate. The victim may have been the culprit in the first place. Without recognising the impact of citizen demand and the culture that tolerates it, we are not going to resolve the big problem. More importantly, without dealing with the cultural ethos that celebrate undeserved opulence, and the perverse values that thwart our original belief in the wealth that comes from hard work, we are not going to successfully confront and win the war against corruption.
Finally, we may then ask the question: what should be our national resolution for 2017 and beyond? First, we must create strong institutions that can withstand the onslaught of political jobbers parading as patriots. Second, we must reverse the vice of conspicuous consumption and vanity that presents itself as a fundamental cultural value. Third, we must affirm once again the truth that hard work is the antidote to poverty and teach the coming generations the same. Fourth, let us truly and in practical terms adhere to the declaration of our norm with a firm embrace of discipline, integrity, dignity of labour, social justice, religious tolerance, self-reliance and patriotism.
- Concluded
-

National resolution for 2017 and beyond (1)
Nigeria enters 2017 in a bad shape, perhaps, its worst economic meltdown since the oil glut of the 1980s led to harsh austerity measures. With divine intervention, the country survived that period but learnt nothing from it. History has thus repeated itself.
I just attributed to divine intervention the nation’s survival of harsh conditions when, all things being equal, she should have collapsed. I could have cited chance or sheer luck. But it feels good to be reassured of a superior being’s interest in our survival.
As a former leader put the matter recently, Nigeria was created by God and God does not make mistakes, and the one who created the nation will not stand by to see her crumble. The God who has been our help in ages past is still our hope for years to come. If so, the various agitators for her collapse and disintegration in favour of more homogenous artifices may be wasting their efforts! Unless, of course, God changes His mind.
And change of mind is always a possibility for the divine who is self-controlled and owes none any explanation. Paradoxically, however, were a survey of Nigerians conducted today, a sizeable majority would favour a change of mind on God’s part, with preference for a dissolution of the God-officiated marriage by which the many became one. The reason is not far-fetched. They are tired of a country that is endowed with the potential for greatness, but has settled for smallness its entire life.
It’s no use cautioning cynics against impatience. They have been patient for more than half a century. It is counterproductive to counsel them against the unknown. They rationally respond that when the known poses an imminent threat to personal survival, the unknown cannot be worse. And there is little doubt that as it is presently constituted and operating, this nation poses an imminent threat to the survival of many of her citizens and residents. Just go to the street corners and the dung hills and you will find tears rolling down your face for God’s creatures. A loving God will change His mind in a jiffy.
But the good news is that it can be fixed, provided the root cause is recognised and dealt with sincerely. If Nigeria was created for greatness and if the greatness of the nation was to have a multiplier effect on the citizens, there must be a formula that the original author, who provided that, has been abandoned at some point. The remedy is to find it and apply it once again.
Let me suggest the following reasoning to find that formula: The greatness of a nation is a function of the goodness of its people. Therefore, for a nation to be great, it must have good people. But the goodness of the people is a function of the goodness of their leaders. Therefore, there must be good leaders. However, the goodness of leaders is a function of the strength of the institutions which create them and monitor them. Therefore, there must be strong institutions. Ultimately then, for a nation to be great, it must have strong institutions.
What is an institution? It is a system of rules and practices established for the purpose of efficient and effective governance. Strong institutions produce good servant leaders and prevent the emergence of leaders that see the nation as their personal estate. Strong institutions prevent the abuse of power.
Consider the case of electoral institutions, a pillar of democratic system of government. With a weak system of rules and practices governing elections, electoral corruption is unavoidable. For the better part of her life, this nation had a corrupt electoral system. It was the immediate cause of the first military incursion into politics and it nearly caused the disintegration of the nation.
We did not learn from that near-death experience which we repeated during the Second Republic, leading again to another military takeover. When finally we appeared to get something right about electoral system in 1993, the personalised rule of the military ensured that it never worked. The institution of the military, which produced strong leaders for the purpose of the defence of the country from external attack, found itself being asked to respect the institution of “bloody civilian” elections. The tail wagged the dog and it also nearly led to the disintegration of the country.
Since the beginning of the Fourth Republic, we have seen the rise and fall of institutional structures which had not been designed well to withstand the assault of egoistic leaders who prefer personal rule to the rule of law. From the Police to EFCC, from Code of Conduct Bureau to INEC, each has been tools in the hands of those they were supposed to rein in. It is not just at the federal level. The states and local governments are veritable grounds for the emasculation of institutions, including the judiciary, whose independence is constitutionally guaranteed. The latter has sadly been exposed as corruption-ridden.
The country has indeed been subjected to the ridiculous competition between the executive and the legislature in the matter of controlling governing institutions. Witness the ongoing effort on the part of the National Assembly to cow the Code of Conduct Bureau.
Surely, there is always self-interest and self-preservation lurking around the corridors of power. Just as I write this column, a news flash appeared on my screen. The Republican Congress in the United States voted to gut an independent ethics law that Democrats had put in place after a series of scandals some years ago. Republicans who now control Congress and the White House wanted Congress to control the Independent Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE). But what happened? There was an avalanche of criticisms, including two tweets from the president-elect. Republicans had no choice but to bow to public opinion and reverse their decision just within 24 hours.
Meanwhile, in our corner of the world, there is intense suffering in the land, with great anxiety for the future, and a frightening precursor to national upheaval which handouts cannot prevent. No human being is satisfied with the indignity of waiting for a handout from anyone. We are wired to be productive agents and not idle consumers. With good planning, strong educational and economic institutions assign people to tasks they are capable of performing without the intervention of god-fathers or god-mothers.
Whenever they suffer from human-made problems, as in the United States economic recession of 2008, citizen resilience, combined with the smartness of good leaders bring them back up. This is why the U. S. unemployment rate is now 4.6%, the lowest in more than 10 years. Our economic institutions are weak because leaders either have little or no clue, or are encumbered by self-seeking gimmicks that preclude respect for the objective laws of economics.
What then must be our national resolution for the year 2017? From the experience of established democracies, we know that strong leaders produced by strong institutions risk a hostile backlash from the public when they attempt to weaken those institutions which have worked effectively and efficiently.
We must collectively resolve, therefore, to create and sustain strong institutions of governance going forward. This is of course contingent upon our collective willingness to give the Nigerian experiment another chance. The leadership slogan of an indivisible entity is just that. Without a willingness on their part to build the institutions that will ensure its indivisibility, it is all going to be a mirage. But the indivisibility of a country must be the outcome of citizens’ reflection on its meaning and promise for them. It cannot be commanded from above.
Assume then that there is the willingness to give the Nigerian project another chance. There must be individual and collective efforts to identify institutions that are required for democratic governance in a federal setting, and a determination to strengthen them. It will not be easy as the leaders at various levels may be tempted to place their self-interest above the national interest. They need to be persuaded to the side of reason. Otherwise, they must be shamed. No one is indispensable.