Tag: NATO

  • NATO announces 5% GDP for defence

    NATO announces 5% GDP for defence

    • Trump reaffirms commitment

    Following a summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in The Hague yesterday, the alliance announced its member nations have agreed to each invest 5% of their Gross Domestic Product toward defence.

    “This is a significant commitment in response to significant threats to our security,” NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said in a press conference.

    Rutte said the 5% breaks down to 3.5% of each country’s GDP invested in “core defence requirements” such as tanks, drones, ammunition and troops, among other items. The 1.5% remainder is to go into investments that will strengthen defence.

    “All to ensure we can effectively deter aggression and defend ourselves, and each other, should anyone make the mistake of attacking,” Rutte added.

    The previous financial benchmark for NATO was 2%, which has either been met or is expected to be met this year by all members.

    “It means that no matter the challenges we face — whether from Russia or terrorism, cyberattacks, sabotage or strategic competition — this Alliance is and will remain ready, willing and able to defend every inch of Allied territory, said Rutte. “And ensure that our one billion people can continue to live in freedom and security.”

    Rutte’s statements followed the meeting yesterday, during which U.S. President Donald Trump reassured NATO allies yesterday that the United States was fully committed to the defence alliance’s so-called Article 5 under which members pledge to come to the military defense of any NATO country that is attacked.

    “We’re with them all the way,” Trump told a joint briefing with Secretary General Mark Rutte at a NATO summit in The Hague, responding to a question on his commitment to NATO and the mutual defense pact at its heart.

    Read Also: Reps approve ₦1.132 trillion 2025 budget for Customs

    Trump added that he was happy to commit because other members of the 32-country alliance had heeded his long-standing call to ramp up their defence budgets and would now meet his demand that they spend 5% of GDP on defense.

    “If you look at the numbers, I’ve been asking them to go up to 5% for a number of years and they’re going up to 5%. That’s a big jump from 2% and a lot of people didn’t even pay the 2%, so I think it’s going to be very big news. NATO is going to become very strong with us and I appreciate doing it,” he said.

    Earlier, Trump sparked consternation after comments made mid-Atlantic aboard Air Force One on Tuesday that his commitment to Article 5 “depends on your definition.”

    The situation in the Middle East dominated most of the rest of the briefing, setting the tone for a gathering that alternated between shows of NATO unity and discussion of the U.S. strikes on Iran and how the situation would play out, despite not being on the agenda.

    That left little room for the issue of Ukraine, which was relegated well down the agenda.

    In his opening remarks to the leaders’ session, Rutte did set out the challenges facing NATO, from Russia’s war on Ukraine and China’s “massive” military build-up to conflict in the Middle East, but hailed what he said were the historic, transformative decisions that would be made at the meeting to “make our people safer through a stronger, fairer and more lethal NATO.”

    He said the additional funds from the 5% spending commitment would go toward bolstering “core” hard defense expenditure, as well as defence and security-related investments, and ensure every country contributed their fair share to the security umbrella NATO provided.

  • U. S. demands more defence spending from NATO allies

    U. S. demands more defence spending from NATO allies

    The United States is as committed to NATO as ever but demands that European allies spend substantially more on defence, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said yesterday, while adding that the U.S. would give allies some time to do that.

    Rubio spoke as he met fellow NATO foreign ministers who gathered in Brussels, with Europeans hoping he would dispel doubts about the U.S. stance even with tensions rising over President Donald Trump’s steep new trade tariffs.

    The Trump administration’s words and actions have raised questions about the future of NATO, the transatlantic alliance that has been the bedrock of European security for the past 75 years.

    Read Also: Shettima in Dakar for Senegal’s 65th Independence anniversary

    “The United States is in NATO … The United States is as active in NATO as it has ever been,” Rubio told reporters, dismissing doubts about that commitment as “hysteria”.

    Rubio added that Trump was “not against NATO. He is against a NATO that does not have the capabilities that it needs to fulfill the obligations that the treaty imposes upon each and every member state.”

    Trump has said the military alliance should spend 5 percent of gross domestic product on defence – a huge increase from the current 2 percent goal and a level that no NATO country, including the United States, currently reaches.

    Washington had also bluntly told European countries it could no longer be primarily focused on the continent’s security.

  • Trump holds first meeting with NATO chief Rutte since election

    Trump holds first meeting with NATO chief Rutte since election

    NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte met U.S. President-elect Donald Trump in Palm Beach, Florida, on Friday, a spokesperson for the transatlantic military alliance said on Saturday.

    “They discussed the range of global security issues facing the Alliance,” the spokesperson, Farah Dakhlallah, said in a brief statement.

    On Friday, NATO did not respond to requests for comment on Dutch media reports that Rutte – a former prime minister of the Netherlands – had flown to Florida on a Dutch government plane to meet Trump.

    Read Also: ‘Navigating uncertainty: Trump’s global legacy and Nigeria’s strategic challenges’

    Rutte was widely regarded as one of the best European leaders at forging a good working relationship with Trump during his first, 2017-21 term as U.S. president.

    NEWSNOW

  • Ukraine, Gaza and NATO’s selective humanity

    Ukraine, Gaza and NATO’s selective humanity

    • By Charles Onunaiju                        

    Between July 8 and10, Western military alliance, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) held a summit to mark the 75 years of its founding in 1949. Despite that’s its founding mission of confronting the defunct Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) has largely disappeared with the collapse of the USSR, the alliance still waxes strong as it finds new adversaries.

    Its Washington summit, where it all began 75 years ago, was high on intense sabre-rattling and extreme belligerence especially directed at its current and foremost strategic adversary, the Russian Federation. It claimed Russia’s military operation against Ukraine was an aimless and provocative wandering of an aggressor, despite an unwritten rule among great powers, that none shall seek or aim to foster a puppet state within the neighbourhood of the other.

    The former Soviet Union learnt this rule the hard way when it secretly deployed nuclear capable missiles in Cuba, just about 70 kilometres to the USA in the 1960s. Washington set out its right to bring the world to ruins if the missiles were not withdrawn, and even the pledge that Cuba was a sovereign nation, with rights according to international law to choose its own partners and host whatever it wishes on its territory, was a non-starter that Washington would not countenance. More than five decades later, Washington and her military alliance members, claimed that Ukraine, located in the strategic neighbourhood of the Russia Federation could join the alliance and host its arsenals, pointing directly and menacingly at Moscow, without consequences.

    In its summit declaration, it declared that “every nation has the right to choose its own security arrangement….” And also “reaffirm our commitment to NATO’s open door policy in line with articles 10 of the Washington Treaty.”

    However, the conflict in Ukraine was the fulcrum of the alliance 75th anniversary. The “Washington Summit Declaration”, mentioned Ukraine 51 times, reaffirming “our unwavering solidarity with Ukraine” giving muscle to its earlier pledge to help Ukraine inflict a strategic defeat on Russia.

    But NATO, the western military alliance with claims to commitment to values of human rights, democracy and sovereign rights of peoples to live in dignity, has not one word to the brutal genocide that Israel enforces in Gaza, a Palestinian enclave of 2.3 million people.

    Read Also: Tinubu appoints Walson-Jack as new Head of the Civil Service

    Nearly 40,000 Palestinians, mostly children, women and elderly have been brutally massacred, with no single building, a worship place, school, hospital, market left standing. Yet the Palestinian people have no formal army, air force or navy which makes them the most defenceless people on the face of the earth. Unborn babies ripped off their mother’s womb by Israeli relentless bombing, young men summarily executed in their hospital beds, the carnage in Gaza largely executed with weapons furnished by the Washington-led NATO alliance members could not find a word in their summit declaration of 38 point plus six-point annex devoted exclusively to Ukraine.

    Neither a call for restraint, ceasefire or even a humanitarian lull in the ongoing onslaught against the Palestinians could be found in NATO’s Summit declaration. NATO, an alliance of selective humanism is utterly bereft of humanity and its audacity to invoke universal human values is a violent, bloody lie. The 32 Euro-Atlantic nations boast endlessly of cultivating mankind’s most cherished universal values of human rights and democracy but could maintain silence in the face of the world’s most brutal onslaught against a defenceless people, makes its complicity even more louder.

    With impunity and arrogance, NATO summiteers’ wagered fingers at China, calling Beijing a “decisive enabler of Russia’s war” in Ukraine, despite that not a single ammunition or any piece of military equipment has been found in the battle field with a trace to Beijing.

    On the other hand, it is rather NATO and its foremost cheer leader, the United States that is the “decisive enabler” of Israel’s war of genocide in Gaza, against a defenceless people without any formal military.

    NATO’s selective humanity that blinds the alliance to the ongoing carnage in Gaza leaves it naked in the market place of global public opinion. How does Ukraine have the right to defend itself but a people displaced from their home for more than six decades, have no right to lay claim to any piece of their former homeland as home, where they can live in peace and pursue their national aspiration.

    In weapons supplies, political and diplomatic support, economic life-lines, NATO is Israel’s most decisive enabler and therefore NATO is compellingly complicit in the crimes in Gaza.

    Despite that it did not occur in a vacuum, the attack on Israel by the armed resistant wing of the Palestinian group HAMAS, on October 7th was widely condemned.

    Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel prime minister who has built a career as “Mr. Security” for guaranteeing security to Israelis even as that has come at the expense of massive crackdown on Palestinians, launched a brutal vendetta, driven by rage. Having declared his intention to eradicate HAMAS, the Israeli regime unleashed an unprecedented military campaign that is less of a war but a callous murdering spree. The United States of America and her allies in NATO, turning logic and common sense on its head, called the Israeli actions, defensive and Washington has repeatedly claimed Israel’s right to defend herself. Israel with the strongest army in the region threw its entire military might against a people who have no standing army. As an urban guerrilla, the HAMAS resistance force has no more effective or viable military strategy than to hide within the civilian population and around civilian infrastructure. And it is common sense that the HAMAS fighters would not need permission from the civilian population to either hide among them or use civilian infrastructure.

    Israel has been totally indiscriminate in the mass killing of Palestinians and it is obvious that all 2.3 million Gaza residents would not have been HAMAS supporters. If Israel only aims to eradicate HAMAS, its actions so far have been to eradicate the entire Palestinians and it has no less a supporter in the horrendous enterprise than the United States and its allies.

    At the 75th anniversary summit, the 32 nation military behemoth which has doled out over $300 billion to Ukraine in combined military, economic and humanitarian aid could not muster a single word for the most defenceless people in the world, currently under the most brutal military assault perpetrated by one of the world’s most armed state.

    Non-Euro-Atlantic peoples and nations in the world do not need any further to take serious the empty slogans of democracy, human rights and universal values by the West. The United Kingdom (UK), complicit in the historical travails of the Palestinians along with other members of the Western alliance has maintained a deafening silence on the ongoing tragedies of the Palestinian people.

    The NATO 75th anniversary summit in Washington has shown the true colour, the true face of the West that their civilization and values, far from been universal is an exclusionist, ideologically narrow and race-tinted world view.

    For now, Israel is on the loose and totally unhinged, murdering Palestinians in their numbers with approval from those who urged one of the world’s strongest armies to “defend itself” against the world’s most defenceless people. It’s, anniversary summit in Washington is another reminder of the root of all the world troubles, reaffirming eloquently that it’s NATO against the world.

    •Onunaiju contributes from Abuja.

  • China slams NATO’s chief over comments on role in Ukraine war

    China slams NATO’s chief over comments on role in Ukraine war

    The Chinese Foreign Ministry yesterday sharply criticised NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg’s statement that allies in the alliance should impose a cost on China for its support of Russia in the war in Ukraine.

    NATO should engage in self-reflection, rather than smear China, Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said in Beijing.

    During a visit to the United States, Stoltenberg said China was ostensibly keeping out of the conflict, while in reality fuelling the largest armed conflict in Europe since World War II.

    “And at the same time, it wants to maintain good relations with the West. Well, Beijing cannot have it both ways.

    Read Also: Senator Nwoko seeks creation of new state in southeast region

    “At some point – and unless China changes course – allies need to impose a cost,” Stoltenberg said.

    Lin responded that China was not party to the Ukraine crisis and was committed to promoting peace talks.

    Beijing is seen in the West as Russia’s staunchest ally, offering support on the international stage while remaining ostensibly neutral.

    The U.S. has imposed sanctions on a number of Chinese companies for supplying Russia with technology for manufacturing arms.

    Lin called on the “relevant parties” to stop deflecting the blame and fuelling the flames and to take concrete actions to promote the political settlement of the crisis.

  • NATO moving missiles closer to Russia’s borders

    NATO moving missiles closer to Russia’s borders

    NATO countries are implementing a rotational air defense model stationed in Lithuania in response to calls from the Baltic states to boost Europe’s defense capabilities in the region.

    According to Lithuanian Defense Minister Arvydas Anušauskas, who spoke about the defense model at a press conference Thursday, the defense systems will be operational in his nation later this year. NATO countries agreed to creating a rotational system—in which allied countries would deploy air defense systems to the Baltic states for a period of time—during the Vilnius NATO Summit in the summer.

    Anušauskas did not state which Western countries are involved in the first round of air defenses being installed in Lithuania, but did say that the equipment includes Patriot surface-to-air missile systems. The defense official told reporters that the Patriots were being provided by a European ally, not the United States.

    “The expectation is that this principle would not be a one-off thing for several months but would cover all of our calendar months and significantly increase our air defense capabilities,” Anušauskas said, as quoted by Lithuanian National Radio and Television.

    Several European countries have raised concerns that Russia’s war against Ukraine could eventually lead to a greater conflict between Moscow and NATO. The military alliance has taken several steps to bolster its defense systems along its eastern border in recent months, including by conducting trainings in the spring for over 90,000 troops from all 32 of the member states in countries that share a border with Russia, such as the Baltic nations and Poland.

    Read Also: We are on course on subsidy removal – FG

    Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have been some of the loudest members of NATO that have urged the Western bloc to prepare for Russia’s next offensive in the region. Estonia’s Foreign Intelligence Service, for example, has said that Russia is preparing for war against NATO countries within the next 10 years.

    Tensions have remained high between Moscow and the West throughout the war in Ukraine, which has been unequivocally supported by NATO members. Russian President Vladimir Putin has blamed the alliance’s influence on Ukraine’s government as one of the reasons his country was “forced” into war. Putin has also said that the two-year-plus conflict cannot come to an end until Ukraine agrees to remain neutral.

    The Kremlin has accused the West of prolonging the war in Ukraine by fortifying Kyiv’s military capabilities, warning late last month that NATO would be crossing a line if allied members send their own troops to fight in Ukraine. While no NATO nation has indicated plans to do so, French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters last month that “nothing should be excluded” in trying to “prevent Russia from winning this war.”

  • How to strengthen NATO, by experts

    How to strengthen NATO, by experts

    Experts from different fields of endeavour have underscored the need to chart a way for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and provide solutions to national and international challenges as well as ensuring a strong and stable future.

     This was as key decision-makers, top research experts, national defence analysts, research organisations, academia and other stakeholders met at the 27th annual conference of  NATO,  which held recently at Johns Hopkins University, USA.

     The conference had representatives from all NATO nations, NATO bodies, NATO agencies, Australia, Austria, Ireland, Japan, New Zealand, Sweden and Switzerland.

     Accomplished Nigerian don, Prof. Adedeji Badiru, in his  paper entitled: “Analytic Integration Model for Systems Optimisation”  highlighted what he called the DEJI systems model: Design, Evaluation, Justification, and Integration in solving national and international issues.

     Badiru, a fellow of Institute of Operational Research and Management Science of Nigeria (IORMS) and also a professor of Systems Engineering and Dean of the Graduate School of Engineering and Management at the USA Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), highlighted what he called a Triple C Application: Communication, Cooperation and Coordination as essential multidimensional communication.

    Read Also: Tinubu’s meets Scholz for investment in power, rail

     The Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, General Philippe Lavigne, explained that the conference was crucial for innovation, and focusing on defence and deterrence would ensure a strong and stable future for NATO.

     The conference, which  had as theme: “Changing Character of Defence and Deterrence: The Power of Analysis”,   reflected the long-standing practice of Operations Research and Analysis in Defence, looked at combating ongoing challenges  faced by the Alliance, while exploring  new methods to old challenges or well-established methods to future challenges.

     “In a world where we are all operating under an avalanche of data, where resources are not without limit, we constantly require the provision of evidence-based advice to our political masters so that they can take decisions at the speed of relevance,” Lavigne said.

  • Putin ally threatens to destroy NATO countries with nuclear weapons

    Putin ally threatens to destroy NATO countries with nuclear weapons

    A prominent Russian TV host and noted propagandist for Russian President Vladimir Putin, Vladimir Solovyov, has opined that Russia would deploy nuclear weapons “right away” in the event of escalating conflict with members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO).

    Russian threats of a potential nuclear conflict with the West have escalated over the course of the country’s invasion of Ukraine, which began in late February 2022. Numerous Kremlin officials, military leaders, and media propagandists have suggested that nuclear weapons could be deployed against Western nations—such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany—that continue to provide aid to Ukraine, though experts differ on how serious these threats actually are.

    Earlier this year, Putin temporarily suspended his country’s participation in the joint New START Treaty with the U.S., and in March announced that Moscow would build tactical nuclear weapon storage facilities in Belarus, a country run by close Putin ally, Alexander Lukashenko.

    Read Also: Melaye kicks as INEC declares Ododo Kogi Gov-Elect

    Yesterday, a Russian media watchdog account, The Kremlin Yap, took to X, the platform previously known as Twitter, to share a recent clip of Solovyov reacting to recent statements from NATO leadership.

    In particular, he mentioned a comment from Peter Nielsen, the commander of NATO forces in Lithuania, who suggested that Kaliningrad would be blockaded in the event of a broader Russia-NATO conflict. Kaliningrad is a key Russian port city on the Baltic Sea, notably situated in the Kaliningrad Oblast, a territory separate from the rest of Russia and enclosed by Lithuania and Poland.

    “Does he think that they will encircle us in a blockade, and we will sit and count our bullets?” Solovyov said, as translated by The Kremlin Yap. “Doesn’t he realise that we’re going to strike with nuclear weapons right away? It is beyond comprehension…We’re going to say goodbye to all these countries. ‘What happened here? I don’t know. You can’t make sense out of the embers.’”

    He continued: “NATO guys, are you really cretins? Do you honestly think that we, with all our gigantic stockpile of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons, will listen to (those opposed to the use of nuclear weapons), who always say, ‘No, stop it’? We won’t even ask them.”

    Article 5 of the NATO agreement states that member nations will view an attack on one of them as an attack on all and provide the necessary military aid in response. An attack by Russia against one of these members, therefore, could lead to a much broader international conflict.

  • NATO begins nuclear weapon drills in Europe

    NATO begins nuclear weapon drills in Europe

    NATO has begun its annual military drills involving nuclear weapons, a spokesman for the Western defence alliance confirmed on Monday.

     Up to 60 aircraft would be involved in the ‘Steadfast Noon’ exercise, which lasts until Thursday next week.

     The craft involved include modern fighter jets, but also surveillance and tanker aircraft as well as long-range B-52 bombers.

     This year, the manoeuvres are taking place mainly in the airspace over Italy, Croatia and the Mediterranean.

     A total of 13 alliance members, including Germany, were taking part.

     NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, said last week that Russia’s war against Ukraine was a reminder of the important role of nuclear weapons for deterrence.

    Read Also: Akpabio, ex-senator clash over sack

     “Although it is a routine training exercise, “Steadfast Noon’’ will help to ensure the credibility, effectiveness and security of nuclear deterrence,” he said.

     NATO did not release any details about the exercise and the scenario that it involved.

     According to military experts, the manoeuvres are used to practice how to safely transport U.S. nuclear weapons on European soil from underground storage sites to the aircraft and mount them under the fighter jets.

    The training flights then took place without the bombs.

     NATO’s nuclear-sharing agreement provided for U.S. nuclear weapons to be stationed in Europe and to be dropped from aircraft of partner states in the event of an emergency.

     Although it has not been officially confirmed, U.S. nuclear weapons were known to be stored in northern Italy, Turkey, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany.

  • Troops kill five bandits, recover arms in Birnin Gwari

    The troops of 1 Division Nigerian Army Kaduna on Thursday said it had eliminated five bandit and recover arms in Birnin Gawri local Government areas in Kaduna State.

    The Deputy Director Army Public Relations 1 divisions Nigerian Army, Col. Muhammad Dole, made the disclosure in a press statement in Kaduna.

    Dole said the troops of the Division, under Operation WHIRL PUNCH, responded to a distress call about an armed robbery along Birnin Gwari–Funtua road.

    “While on pursuit of the armed robbers, they were ambushed by suspected bandits. However, they fought their way and overpowered the bandits, who hastily withdrew into Kwuyambana forest in Zamfara State.

    He said during the pursuit of the bandits in the forest, the bodies of five bandits were found.

    ”Among the eliminated bandits was a notorious bandit from Zamfara identified as Sani Danbuzuwa.

    “Regrettably, we lost one soldier and two were injured. The wounded soldiers were evacuated and they are responding to treatment at the military hospital in Kaduna.

    ”After thorough searched of the ambush area, the following items were recovered: 1 x AK47 rifle, 3 magazines, 87 rounds of 7.62mm (special) 1 G3 rifle, 4 magazines, 61 rounds of 7.62mm (NATO).”

    He also disclosed that a wanted kidnapper and expert in negotiations for ransom, called Yinusa Suleiman, from Sambuwa village was apprehended by troops on Aug. 14.

    “He is currently assisting the security operatives in further investigations,” he said.

    Dole restated the troops’ commitment to ensuring security and safe passage to all commuters along highways of Kaduna–Abuja and Kaduna–Birnin Gwari roads as well as the adjoining towns and villages.