Tag: NBA

  • Ikere-Ekiti NBA award for Falana’s wife

    Ikere-Ekiti NBA award for Falana’s wife

    Lawyers have been advised to play active roles in ensuring corruption-free judicial process.

    Former House of Representatives member Opeyemi Bamidele and Lagos lawyer Femi Falana’s wife, Funmi, accused some lawyers of complicity in the corruption in the judicial system.

    They spoke at Ikere-Ekiti at the maiden edition of the End of the Year Award Dinner and Lecture of the Nigerian Bar Association, Ikere Ekiti Branch, Ekiti State.

    They said corruption in the judiciary should be of great concern to lawyers and Nigerians.

    The Ikere NBA gave awards to Wole Olanipekun (SAN); eminent lawyer,  Ola Olanipekun (SAN) and Mrs  Falana in recognition of their contributions to the profession.

    Mrs. Falana advised lawyers to monitor their colleagues and judges to prevent corruption.

    She urged lawyers to have the courage to speak out.

    The rights lawyer canvassed unity among lawyers to allow more women in active legal practice.

    Speaking in a lecture entitled: “Restoring public confidence in the justice sector: The role of lawyers,” Bamidele said: “The NBA must be seen to be more proactive in setting the pace.

    “It must ensure that some of its members accused of complicity in corruption-related matters are investigated and sanctioned.

    “Lawyers must be organised, articulate, fearless and transparent in their expression.

    “The judicial process must be guided by the fundamental values and principles of constitutional democracy as well as the values of simple decency.

    “Our judgments and pronouncements must not appear to be against the essence of justice,” he said.

  • NBA seeks laws to prevent corruption

    NBA seeks laws to prevent corruption

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has called for laws that will prevent corruption.

    Its president Abubakar Mahmoud  (SAN) expressed “grave concern” that the anti-corruption crusade seems to focus on fighting corruption after it has occurred.

    To him, not much attention is paid to preventive measures with a view to minimising the incidence of corruption.

    “We strongly believe that prevention must equally be robust and effective. The current system is not sufficiently robust to prevent corruption from occurring within the public service system.

    “We call on the Federal Government of Nigeria to initiate measures that seek to prevent corruption from occurring, in addition to the fight after corruption has occurred.

    “The NBA calls on the National Assembly and the State Houses of Assembly to utilise their immense legislative powers, not only to strengthen existing anti-corruption laws and institutions, but also to consider the enactment of new anti-corruption laws in Nigeria that will be prevention focused,” Mahmoud stated.

    Accoding to him, ant-graft agencies need institutional and structural reforms to make them more efficient.

    Mahmoud, who spoke in Lagos at a forum to mark the International  Anti-Corruption Day, believed that  unless  there were institutional and structural changes in the laws establishing the anti-corruption agencies, desired result would not be achieved.

    Mahmoud said: “It is regrettable that in spite of all the efforts against corruption, Nigeria is still rated very low in the annual anti-corruption index of Transparency International.

    “We observe that although the Federal Government has established anti-corruption agencies, these institutions are bedeviled by certain institutional and structural constraints.

    “In view of the fact that anti-corruption crusade is part of our public interest programme  especially at the Bar and Bench, the NBA calls for urgent structural, legal and institutional reforms of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for more effectiveness and efficiency.”

    NBA praised efforts to fight corruption, noting that the legal and institutional frameworks be strenghtened.

    “To combat corruption successfully, a combination of strong legal and ethical frameworks and the presence of effective institutions are important for success.

    “We further recommend that the mechanisms for investigation and prosecution against corruption must be restructured and strengthened,” he said.

    Mahmoud restated NBA’s commitment to the fight against corruption, especially in the judiciary.

    He said only an independent Judiciary can fight corruption.

    “We call upon the Federal Government to ensure that adequate funds are allocated to the Judiciary as it prepares to present the 2017 appropriation Bill to the National Assembly.

    “It is expected that adequate funding will contribute to independence of the judiciary and reduce the incidence of judicial corruption.

    “With regards to the Bar, the Nigerian Bar association shall spare no effort in weeding out corrupt lawyers in the legal profession through diverse means including our disciplinary mechanism,” he said.

    He said erring lawyers would be disbarred in a bid to “make the legal profession unattractive for corrupt lawyers.”

  • NBA election dispute: Court stops proceedings indefinitely

    NBA election dispute: Court stops proceedings indefinitely

    High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama, Abuja, has stopped further proceedings in the case challenging the outcome of the last Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) presidential election.

    Joe Gadzama (SAN), who was defeated in the election,   approached the court to challenge the process leading to  victory of Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN) as the the association’s president.

    He urged the court to among others, void the election on the grounds that it was conducted in breach of some provisions of the association’s rules guiding the conduct of elections.

    But yesterday, Justice Y. Halilu, told parties that he will adjourn further proceedings indefinitely since the appeal filed against the court’s earlier ruling has been entered at the appellate court.

    The judge also referred to a letter by plaintiff’s lawyer, Sebastine Hon (SAN) seeking an indefinite adjournment to enable his client pursue his appeal at the Court of Appeal.

    Gadzama appealed the court’s ruling in which the judge elected to first determine the objection filed by Mahmoud, challenging the court’s jurisdiction to hear the case.

    Gadzama wanted the court to hear the objection simultaneuosly with the substantive suit.

    The letter by Gadzama’s lawyer titled: “Application for adjournment sine die, reads: “You may recall that we have appealed against the ruling on our application for consolidation of preliminary objection with the substantive suit delivered on November 8, 2016 by his Lordship, Justice Y. Halilu.

  • NBA joins forces with govt over Niger Delta crisis, Boko Haram insurgency

    NBA joins forces with govt over Niger Delta crisis, Boko Haram insurgency

    Lawyers have raised two teams to join forces with the Federal Government in tackling the Niger Delta militancy and restoring the Northeast.

    Inaugurating the task forces, NBA President Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN) noted that the twin challenges of insurgency and militancy in the Northeast and the Niger Delta constituted a threat to national security.

    Mahmoud said: “Although the 1999 Constitution provides that the security, protection of life and property is the primary duty of the government, the Bar and the general public have roles to play in tackling the security problems in Nigeria. Let me also commend the commitment and political will exhibited by the Buhari Administration in the fight against insurgency in the Northeast.

    “We have in the last year and half seen the liberation of most of the areas previously held by the insurgents and the restoration, to a large extent, of normalcy in the region.  Earlier this month Nigerians were delighted to receive the heart-warming news of  the release of 21 out of the 219 Chibok school girls held in captivity for more than two years.”

    Mahmoud praised the military and security agencies for the success achieved.

    ý”The NBA has reviewed the state of affairs in the Northeast region of Nigeria, especially the severe security problems confronting our members in particular and innocent citizens in general. In the last 12 months, I have visited the IDPS in Maiduguri three times the last being a campaign tour in my quest to occupy this office.

    “I recall during our last visit, some of my colleagues on the campaign broke down in tears on sighting the hundreds of malnourished children who were orphaned in the camps.

    ”It is also worthy of mention that the insurgency in the Northeast has affected the independence of the legal profession and the welfare of our members.

    “Legal practice in North Eastern Nigeria has been largely disrupted as a result of the insurgency in the region. Our noble colleagues in that part of the country are besieged and endangered.

    “There are even many of our members from other parts of Nigeria who have lived and practised in North Eastern Nigeria for years. Some even married and settled there. But, as I speak, most of our members have not only lost their practice as professionals, but have also lost their livelihoods and physical wellbeing.

    “Even some of our members are regarded as insurgents and threatened with prosecution. Also, judicial officers are loathe to adjudicate on certain types of cases in the absence of adequate protection of their lives and families. This is the situation in which our members have found themselves in the Northeast of Nigeria,” Mahmoud said.

    On the trouble in the  Niger Delta, Mahmoud spoke of “the devastating impact of the conflict on the various communities and citizens living in the region”. “It is clear that the environmental destruction and the human suffering and the general impact on the national economy are huge.

    “We believe that there is need to inculcate law into the development plans and objectives for the Niger Delta region. We consider law to be crucial to unlocking the potential key areas in the Niger Delta. Law can be applied to the framework for maritime and coastal security, ocean governance, trade, natural resources development, peace and conflict resolution initiatives.

    “It is our hope too that we can make our services available to address any possible negotiations between the various communities and actions in the region aimed and at achieving resolution of the conflicts.”

    Members of the task force for the Northeast are: Prof. Mohammed M. Tabiu – SAN – (chairman), Prof. Ayo Atsenuwa – Alternate Chair, Prof. Isa Hayatu Chiroma, Rakiya Mukhtar Tofa,  Altine Ibrahim, Hafsatu Mohammed and Hassan Maidoki.

    Others are:  Lauretta Adaeze,  Hauwa Shekarau, Amina Ibrahim, Ronke Ige, Alfa Ibrahim, Isa Muhammad Nurudeen and Kunle Adegoke.

    Members of the task force on Niger Delta are;  Albert Akpomudge, SAN – (chairman),  Ledum Mitee Esq (alternate chairman), Mia Essien (SAN),  Mba Ukweni, SAN,  Q. E. B. Offiong (SAN), Charles Ajuwa (SAN) and Sosoprieye Long Williams.

    Others are  Kelvin Ejelonu, Muyiwa Olowokure, Sagir Gazawa,Mrs. Lillian Ene Ogar , Nkiruka Maduekwe, and Alex Mouka Esq. – Secretary.

     

  • NBA, NJC and the burden of history

    NBA, NJC and the burden of history

    From an initial thunder of “judicial emergency”, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) is softening its war cry.  It now wants judges, accused of corrupt practices, to recuse themselves, until they clear their names.

    That is tribute to common sense.

    But not so from the National Judicial Council (NJC) war room.  That body seems fated, with all due respect, to that cynical old quip: those the gods would destroy, they first confound!

    In that rarefied NJC chamber, scoffing down from the clouds at the unlearned hoi polloi on the dusty streets, stubborn procedure must trump common sense.

    That fixation with technicality is clear hubris, which may yet prove fatal for the  NJC brand integrity.

    That was clear from its stonewalling — not entirely unreasonable — of the Department of State Services, DSS’s rather cheeky call on NJC to “suspend” judges it is accusing of sleaze.

    NJC was right to bristle: if DSS could go solo, and with satanic gusto, jettisoning constitutionally stipulated procedures on disciplining errant judges, why doesn’t it complete its solo demolition run?

    The DSS Leviathan doesn’t need NJC’s puny powers to suspend anyone, does it?  Perfect sarcasm!

    Still, it would be extremely reckless, with all due respect, for NJC to spurn the NBA-offered soft-landing.

    For one, the NBA suggestion gives the judiciary the opportunity to regain a moral high ground.  What is more?  NJC would suspend nobody; and would continue to hold DSS in high judicial contempt its hurt soul now needs for mental balance.

    Yet, the accused judges would graciously stay off, pending their days in court, as they would in any civil community.  The onus would now be on DSS to prove its allegations, thus defanging the so-called trial by the media.

    For another, the initiative would have been the judiciary’s.  That would send the message that though it would resist — to the death, if necessary — the DSS’s alleged jungle methods, it would not condone any judicial corruption.

    But by its response to the NBA pitch, it would appear clear the NJC would rather, parodying English Poet, John Milton in Paradise Lost, rule by its stubborn procedure in hell, rather serve with it in heaven!

    If you think the heaven-hell comparison is extreme, just take a glimpse at the judicial netherworld NJC, by its stubborn insistence on procedure, is pushing.

    It would not suspend judges, because DSS usurped procedure by its sensational arrests.  Neither would it hearken NBA’s plea that the accused judges recuse themselves.

    So, blimey!  His Lordship, accused of graft, arrogantly sits in judgment over others, in a sensational case of an alleged felon trying another alleged felon!

    If that is not the eminent judicial disgrace — and ruin — NJC is fleeing from, it is hard to contemplate a worse equivalent!

    Adegoke Adelabu, had he lived in these troubling times, would simply have snorted:  a judicial peculiar mess! To which his doting Ibadan country yokels would have roared, “judisia pen-kele-meeesssssiiiiiiiiii!”, with a few even attempting a yodel, in the hilarious hubbub of the moment!

    It is that peculiar mess of history that the contemporary judiciary (perhaps without fully realizing it) is grappling with.

    If the NJC must be fair to themselves, they must ask when the Nigerian Judiciary cascaded from the Mount Olympus of honour, to the Hades of disgrace, to borrow an illustration from Greek mythology.

    A proud national institution that earned near-universal acclaim with the likes of Taslim Elias, Chukwudifu Oputa, aka Socrates, Kayode Esho, Daddy Onyeama, Udo Udoma and Akinola Aguda (all of blessed memories) now diminuted to the grim conclave of what Justice Esho called “billionaire judges”, allegedly trading Justice — or more correctly, injustice — to the highest bidder!

    Remember that biblical racket, that riled the meek Christ Jesus to ire?  My father’s house of worship has become a den of thieves!

    Just replace, with the NJC, Pharisees and Sadducees and the colluding high priests feeding fat from that holy racket, and contemporary Nigerian judiciary may well find itself in that holy company of the Jews of yore!

    Yet, let no one, in romanticizing the past, be deceived that the judiciary had always been perceived spotless — at least by those in the unlearned streets, that neither knew law nor procedure.

    CJN Adetokunbo Ademola virtually made the law an ass for the ruling establishment to spur as they wished.   So,  when in 1967, he championed a National Conciliation Committee to fend off war — a noble enterprise — voices across the Nigeria-Biafra divide rejected him as a credible voice for mediation.

    Forty-nine years later, his grandson is one of the judges in the eye of the DSS storm.  If the allegations are proved, would it be from alleged personal failings? Or the case of the Biblical fathers eating sour grapes but setting their children’s teeth on edge?

    Justice Elias was razor-sharp, both as lawyer and CJN.  But as Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa’s attorney-general and Justice minister, he midwifed, on 29 November 1960 in the House of Representatives,  the parliamentary canonization of the legal voodoo that in 1962 supplanted the West, under the guise of a dubious emergency.  That proved the beginning of the end for the 1st Republic.

    Ironically, the “Elias solution” — searching for CJN, outside the Supreme Court’s present hierarchy, hangs like a sword of Damocles.

    The “weight of evidence” himself, the irreplaceable FRA Williams, SAN, would at dawn take a brief from Satan but balance it out at dusk with a brief from Christ and claim, in all honesty and integrity, he was bound by the lawyer’s creed!

    His opponents, particularly the equally irrepressible Gani Fawehinmi, SAN, SAM, did not like it.  But almost everyone agreed his motives were anything but robust fidelity to the law, even it became a bully crushing morality.

    That was the law yesterday, warts and all.  Still, the public perception of it was a great national enterprise which though imperfect, held humanly promises — profound promises founded on robust erudition and near-celestial integrity.

    The law today would appear the diametrical opposite.  Despite stellar though quiet work by probably a majority of Nigerian justices and lawyers, the overwhelming public perception is the Bench is yet another conclave of hustlers.  And that the Bar is not exactly aghast at that unholy racket.

    Help, the ghosts of Esho’s “billionaire judges” are haunting the hallowed chamber, and are fast turning it a hollow shell!

    That is the heavy burden of history the present generation NJC and NBA carry.  You don’t discharge that by instinctively raising a flag of solidarity, and stonewalling grave allegations with “defending the judiciary”.

    Corrupt judges are a scourge to justice, much more than any arbitrary DSS action, no matter how brazen.  And if justice departs from the judiciary, what is left?

    If that thinking necessitated NBA’s softening rhetoric, it is hugely welcome — but much more to the judiciary themselves.

    But when would the NJC wake up and, as the Americans would say, smell the coffee?

    Maybe when, to parody Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the hurly-burly is done, when the battle is lost and won!

  • No basis for condemning judges’ arrest – Ex-NBA Chairman

    No basis for condemning judges’ arrest – Ex-NBA Chairman

    Mr Jonathan Taidi, a former Chairman of Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Minna Branch, on Monday said there was no basis for condemning the Department of State Security Service (DSS) over recent arrest of judges.

    Taidi told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Minna that the DSS acted within the realm of the law.

    He challenged those criticizing the action, to show any court order which declared the DSS action illegal.

    He explained that from information available in public domain, the DSS obtained valid search warrants before conducting the search on the judges’ premises.

    “Why are we condemning the DSS when they are in possession of valid search warrants,” he queried.

    The former NBA chairman stressed that the affected judges have a moral burden to establish their innocence before members of the general public.

    Taidi insisted that the judges must strive to defend their reputation and integrity, so as to insulate the judicial institution from ridicule.

    He advocated for the strengthening of disciplinary mechanism, to enhance transparency in judicial service.

    The urged judges to be transparent and ensure fair and just determination of cases, to restore confidence of Nigerians in the judiciary.

     

     

  • Senior lawyers fault NBA on fate of arrested judges

    Senior lawyers fault NBA on fate of arrested judges

    Some senior lawyers have disagreed with the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) that the judges arrested by the Department of State Services (DSS) should proceed on compulsory suspension.

    NBA President Abubakar Mahmud (SAN), at a function in Abuja on Thursday, called on the National Judicial Council (NJC) to act fast to save the ebbing reputation of the judiciary in the eye of the public.

    He suggested the suspension of the arrested judges pending establishment of their innocence.

    But NJC, in a statement on Friday, argued that the NBA was wrong in calling for the judges’ suspension, having earlier supported the council’s decision to condemn the arrest, which it described as an attempt to cow the judiciary.

    The NJC said, in the statement by its Acting Director of Information, Soji Oye, that it could only exercise disciplinary powers over judicial officers, where due process was complied with.

    Senior lawyers, including Professor Yemi Akiseye-George (SAN), Selekeowei Larry (SAN) and Akinlolu Kehinde (SAN) agreed with the NJC. Norrison Quakers (SAN) agreed with the NBA.

    Akinseye-George said: “The allegation against the judges must be proved. You cannot just accept the words of the investigators, particularly that they have reasons to be unhappy with the judges.

    “For example, DSS has a case before Justice Nnamdi Dimgba (of the Federal High Court, Abuja, whose house, the DSS said, was mistakenly invaded by its men).

    “They have made allegations against Justice Dimgba, but which are not proved. So, would you now ask them to stop sitting simply because some people have made allegations against them? No!

    “A process must be put in place by the NJC to investigate those allegations. An independent committee must be set up by NJC to sit publicly (not secret committee) and investigate the allegations, in the full glare of the media, so that it will be obvious to Nigerians whether the DSS people were abusing their powers or attempting to intimidate the judiciary.

    “Some of the affected judges have written to the CJN, stating their sides of the story. So, it is an embarrassment for the NBA to say that the judges should stop sitting simply because allegations were made against them.”

    Larry said: “I don’t know where they (NBA) got that idea from. It is a wrong one.

    “There is no authority that can do that. Nobody can just wake up in the morning and say I have suspended a judge.

    “The procedure for appointing and disciplining judicial officers is contained in the Constitution. For the NBA, I think that was just an oversight. It was not a well thought-out position.

    Kehinde said: “The position of the NBA is grossly untenable. Because, it means that whenever you are presiding over a matter as a judge and any security agency that is not happy with the way you are handling it, the next thing is that they will arrange to put some money in your house and get television cameras to film it and claim that you have taken money. And as a consequence, you will have no choice, but to step aside.

    “This is a dangerous precedent that we want to set. I repeat, this is a very, very dangerous precedent. Why has NBA not advised all its members, who have been accused in the Harliburton fraud to step aside from practising? Why is the NBA president himself, whose election is being challenged, did not step aside until the matter is decided by the court?”

    Quakers said: “If the Bar has now informed the NJC, as the body responsible for the appointment and discipline of judges to suspend the judges, I think, as joint stakeholder in the administration of justice, the wise thing to do is for those judges to step aside.

    “How would you explain that a justice of the Supreme Court is being arraigned in a court for a criminal trial, and that same judge will now go back to his regular court to sit?

    “Where things are done properly, in such a situation, whoever is concerned, should step aside for the time being until the issue is determined.

    “Will a litigant have respect for a High Court judge, who is arraigned in court for criminal culpability or criminal trial? Even, for the psyche of the judge, it is not good.

    “For me, I believe that, yes the Constitution provides that everyone, who is charged with criminal culpability is innocent until proved guilty.

    “Mind you, if you are being investigated, part of the requirements, when you are

  • Osinbajo, NBA executives meet in Aso Rock

    Vice President Yemi Osinbajo on Monday met behind closed doors with the new Executives members of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    The meeting came at a time the executive is perceived in some quarters to be persecuting the judiciary arm of government with the Department of State Services (DSS) arresting some judges over allegations of corruption.

    No official statement has been issued concerning the purpose of the visit and issues discussed at the time of filing this report.

    But the visit was said to be a courtesy call on Osinbajo by the new executive of NBA.

    “It was a courtesy call. The new NBA officers wanted to meet with him after their elections,” a source said.

    Mr. Abubakar Mahmoud had emerged as the new president of the NBA in an election in August this year.

    Mahmoud won the election with 3,055 votes to defeat his rival, Joe-Kyari Gadzama, who got 2,384 votes.

  • Osinbajo, NBA executives meet in Aso Villa

    Osinbajo, NBA executives meet in Aso Villa

    Vice President Yemi Osinbajo yesterday met with the Executive members of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    The meeting came at a time the executive is perceived in some quarters to be persecuting the   judiciary arm of government, following the Department of State Services (DSS)’s arrest of some judges over allegations of corruption.

    No official statement was issued on the purpose of the visit and issues discussed but the visit was described as a courtesy call on Osinbajo by the new NBA leadership.

  • DSS lied on two Supreme Court Justices, says NBA

    DSS lied on two Supreme Court Justices, says NBA

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) admitted yesterday that t National Judicial Council’s capacity to deal with erring judges was inadequate.

    It has resolved to constitute a committee to be jointly coordinated by two former NBA Presidents, Wole Olanipekun (SAN) and Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) to suggest ways to strengthen the NJC to ensure its effectiveness.

    The committee has three weeks to submit a report, NBA President Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN), said yesterday.

    Mahmoud said: “I will like to say that from the information that has been made available to us by the National Judicial Council, from 2000 to September 2016, a total of 73 cases affecting various judges have been handled and disposed of by the NJC.

    “There have been cases of dismissal, cases of compulsory retirement and cases of reprimand and of which have been addressed by the NJC.

    “Now is it enough? Maybe it is not enough and that is why we have constituted the task force to review the entire architecture of the disciplinary system of the NJC and the make recommendations for improvement to enable the NJC to take proper charge and deal with erring members of the judiciary.

    “We believe the disciplinary architecture needs to be improved on in terms of how cases involving erring Justices are dealt with. We will like to also say that the NJC disciplinary powers are clearly stated in the Constitution.”

    Mahmoud said, from what he learnt from the National Judicial Council (NJC), there were no prior complaints as regard the two Justices of the Supreme Court – Sylvester Ngwuta and John Okoro – who were arrested by the Department of State Services (DSS).

    Mahmoud, who briefed journalists after a meeting of some senior lawyers, including the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami, three of his predecessors, some past NBA Presidents and representatives of the NJC, reiterated his association’s condemnation of the way the judicial officers were arrested.

    The meeting was held under the aegis of the “Crisis Management Committee (CMC) set up by the NBA President to find a way out of the crisis resulting from the arrest of judges and threat to arrest more.

    According to Mahmoud, the former AGFs at the meeting, held at the Abuja Head office complex of the NBA, were Kanu Agabi (SAN), Akin Olujinmi (SAN) and Adetokunbo Kayode (SAN).

    Past NBA Presidents at the meeting were: ,Olanipekun, Agbakoba, Joseph Daudu (SAN) and Okey Wali (SAN). The NJC was represented by its Secretary, Halilu Danladi.

    Mahmoud, who was silent on what the AGF told the meeting, dwelt extensively on the position of the NJC. He debunked the DSS’ allegation that the NJC failed to act on its complaints against the judges.

    He said, of the seven judicial officers arrested, the NJC had concluded the case of four and recommended their exit from the bench. He said the case of one was still pending, while the two Justices of the Supreme Court never had any complaint against them.

    He said it was wrong for the DSS to accuse the NJC of not doing enough, and to demand that the council provide it with disciplinary records of the judges it had disciplined.

    The NBA President said, as a constitutional body, with the independence and authority to solely discipline erring judges, the NJC could not be supervised by the DSS and was not answerable to any security agency.

    Mahmoud, who said his association supports the Federal Government’s fight against corruption, noted that NBA’s complaint was with the process adopted in relation to the case of the judicial officers.

    He said although no judicial officer was above the law of the land, the necessary procedure required that any Judge, who commits crime, must first be subjected to the disciplinary procedure of the NJC before he/she is subjected to the full weight of the law.

    “We must not destroy the institution,expose it to ridicule, disdain and humiliation in the eyes of the public, including international communities in the name of fighting corruption.

    “We did not see any reason why this military style operation was adopted. We do not see anything wrong in the police inviting them or filing charges against them,” Mahmoud said.

    He argued that it was not within the powers of the DSS to investigate corruption. He said what DSS ought to have done, if indeed it had information about the judges committing any crime, was to liaise with the agency constitutionally empowered to handle such cases.

    “We do not think it is (DSS’) responsibility to go into the issues of this nature that is constitutionally- vested in other institutions of government including the police.

    “Secondly, we quarrel at the method adopted, of raiding the houses of judges in the middle of the night by armed masked men and going there to knock down doors and walls. These judges are not terrorists and we do not think they should be subjected to that kind of treatment.

    “We are sure that the state has the capacity to investigate this matter in accordance with due process and in line with convention practice. We saw no justification for that kind of action.

    “We have engaged with the NJC and there was no any evidence that has been made available to us that suggests that the two Justices of the Supreme Court were ever invited or indeed there was any complaint by anybody against them.

    “This is the information we got from the NJC and we don’t have any reason to doubt. So where no complaint has been made either by DSS itself or by other citizens then this sort of very drastic measures were taken, we do not see any justification for that.

    “The Supreme Court and indeed other superior courts in Nigeria are part of the judicial institutions of this country and we cannot denigrate them under the guise that we are fighting corruption.

    “In this case, especially in the case of the two Justices of the Supreme Court, we have been informed that there was no formal complaints against any of the two prior before this action being taken.

    In all the cases and the briefing we have received from the NJC, we have not seen anyone in which the NJC failed to act in respect of complaints by the DSS. We are aware that in one or two of the complaints, the DSS was not satisfied with the outcome of the NJC’s investigations and findings. But it is not true that there have been complaints, at least we have not seen, that they complained and the NJC refused to act.

    We’ve seen cases in which the NJC complained and there were exchanges of communication between the NJC and the DSS. And in those cases we were shown evidence, that the NJC acted, albeit the action of the NJC, was apparently not satisfactory to the DSS.