Tag: NBA

  • Ubani to NBA: don’t be silent about lawyers’ plight

    Ubani to NBA: don’t be silent about lawyers’ plight

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Dr. Monday Ubani, has urged the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) leadership to urgently rise to the defence of its members and reposition the legal profession for dignity, relevance, and sustainability.

    In a statement titled “Reinventing the Nigerian Bar Association: Urgent Imperatives for Reformative and Caring Leadership,” Ubani decried what he described as the NBA’s glaring silence on critical issues affecting the welfare and career progression of Nigerian lawyers. 

    He warned that unless the association wakes up to its responsibilities, the future of legal practice in Nigeria could face irreversible decline.

    According to Ubani, a growing number of legal practitioners, especially those in public service and private litigation, have become disillusioned with the NBA’s failure to proactively engage with the daily challenges confronting them. 

    He noted that while other professional bodies such as those for doctors and engineers have successfully lobbied for improved entry levels and benefits, lawyers in the public sector continue to stagnate without NBA support.

    Worse still, Ubani said, is the discriminatory rule that excludes public sector lawyers from contesting for certain NBA offices — a restriction he believes violates the provisions of the Trade Union Act, which protects members of professional associations from such political marginalisation.

    Beyond internal politics, he lamented the NBA’s failure to intervene in the widespread injustices and inefficiencies lawyers face in Nigeria’s judiciary. 

    Read Also: NBA condemns kidnap of judge in Bayelsa

    He listed arbitrary and exorbitant court filing fees, extortion at court registries, undue disciplinary actions by court staff, and the near-impossibility of post-judgment enforcement as examples of systemic dysfunctions that the NBA has failed to challenge.

    “The Bar’s silence in the face of these indignities is not only disappointing but deeply troubling. 

    “A legal profession that cannot defend its own is doomed to irrelevance,” Ubani stated. 

    He also criticised the procedural decline in the National Industrial Court, where delays in filing, service, and assignment of cases have become rampant — a trend now mirrored in many State and Federal High Courts. 

    According to him, this judicial inefficiency is pushing many litigation lawyers into what he termed “professional poverty.”

    Ubani expressed further disappointment over the NBA’s failure to push for the inclusion of the Nigerian Law School in the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, TETFund, noting that while institutions like the Nigerian Defence Academy benefit from the fund, law school campuses remain underfunded and burdened with rising tuition.

    More concerning, he noted, is the harassment and intimidation of lawyers by security agencies while carrying out their legitimate duties. 

    “It is shocking that lawyers are still barred from entering certain security establishments with their phones — a barbaric and unconstitutional policy that the NBA should have long challenged in court,” he said.

    Ubani also raised the alarm over the long delays in appeals at the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, where cases often remain unheard for six to ten years. 

    He described the impact on justice delivery, investor confidence, and the livelihoods of lawyers as devastating.

    “What becomes of litigants who die or lose everything before their appeals are heard?” he asked.

    Despite this grim picture, Ubani acknowledged a few bright spots. 

    He commended the NBA’s recent push for a harmonised and realistic scale of fees in property transactions and conveyancing, describing it as a welcome move that could improve the financial standing of lawyers if properly enforced across jurisdictions.

    He also praised the current NBA President, Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN), for his energetic and responsive leadership since assuming office. 

    According to Ubani, Osigwe has shown a clear understanding of the profession’s pulse and has already achieved notable milestones in just one year.

    “This critique is not to undermine the good already done,” Ubani clarified. 

    “Rather, it is an appeal to Mazi Osigwe to use the remainder of his tenure to confront these urgent issues head-on.”

    He called for a complete reorientation of the NBA’s leadership philosophy — one that prioritises inclusion, assertiveness, and unwavering advocacy on behalf of lawyers across the country.

    “We need a Bar that does more than organise annual conferences and elections. 

    “We need a Bar that will stand with its members in the trenches of everyday practice, challenge injustice wherever it exists, and defend the legal profession with courage and clarity. 

    “The time to act is now. The survival of the Nigerian legal profession depends on the NBA’s willingness to reform, to lead, and to protect its own,” he concluded.

    Ubani was a former Ikeja Branch Chairman and later Second Vice President of the NBA.

    He also chaired the the NBA Section on Public Interest and Development Law (NBA-SPIDEL).

  • NBA moves to tackle high costs of legal education, issues new directives on CPD training

    NBA moves to tackle high costs of legal education, issues new directives on CPD training

    In a bid to tackle growing discontent over the rising costs of Continuing Legal Education (CLE) courses, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has unveiled new directives to overhaul the administration and accessibility of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) training nationwide.

    The decision followed a high-level meeting convened by NBA President, Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, alongside the Director of the Institute of Continuing Legal Education (ICLE) and leaders of the Young Lawyers Forum. The meeting was prompted by complaints, particularly from younger lawyers, about the affordability and perceived compulsion of CPD programmes.

    In a statement issued Tuesday, the NBA clarified that CPD participation is strictly voluntary, and no lawyer will be mandated to attend any particular training. “Every lawyer has the right to choose which training to attend,” the association affirmed.

    The NBA also distanced itself from the payment structure of CPD programmes, explaining that all fees are paid directly to service providers, not the association. The NBA’s role, it said, is limited to publicising accredited CPD opportunities for the benefit of its members.

    To address cost-related concerns, the NBA has directed the ICLE Board to vet and approve the pricing of CPD courses to ensure affordability and transparency. The Board was also tasked with ensuring the continuous availability of free training sessions across the country.

    Read Also: JUSUN strike: NBA decries judiciary shutdown in Ondo, writes Aiyedatiwa 

    Lawyers can fulfil their annual five-hour CPD requirement by attending free seminars from accredited institutions or participating in NBA-organised programmes at the national and branch levels.

    According to Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, President, Nigerian Bar Association, branch-level trainings and activities will now count toward CPD credits, and the ICLE Board has been encouraged to collaborate with law faculties and legal training institutes to accredit their programmes, thereby widening access to CPD credit-earning opportunities.

    “The NBA remains committed to fostering a professional environment that upholds fairness, access to knowledge, and the highest standards of ethical and intellectual engagement,” Osigwe stated.

    He emphasised that the ICLE system should support the growth and competence of lawyers, not impose financial burdens.

    The Association reaffirmed its pledge to continue engaging stakeholders to ensure that the legal education framework in Nigeria remains “affordable, responsive, inclusive, and empowering for all members of the legal profession.”

  • Ex-NBA president rejects bid to terminate ‘$8.4m AGO theft’ trial

    Ex-NBA president rejects bid to terminate ‘$8.4m AGO theft’ trial

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President, Joseph Daudu (SAN), has urged the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja to reject an attempt by the Attorney-General of the Federation, Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), to discontinue a multi-million dollar criminal case against Trafigura Beheer BV and Trafigura PTE Limited.

    The defendants are on trial for allegedly stealing $8.4 million worth of Automotive Gas Oil (AGO) from Nadabo Energy Limited, which they denied.

    Daudu, the counsel for Nadabo Energy, the nominal complainant in the matter, urged Justice Mojisola Dada to set aside the notice of discontinuance on the ground that it was unconstitutional, the case having been brought under Lagos State law and not federal law.

    Other defendants in the case are Yusuf Kwande, Mettle Energy and Gas, Rembrandt Limited, Osahon Asemota, and Jil Engineering and Oil Services Limited.

    The Police Special Fraud Unit (SFU) accused the defendants of stealing Automotive Gas Oil (AGO) worth about $8,442,806.09 from Nadabo Energy Limited.

    Read Also: Osinbajo calls for political engagement for national transformation

    They pleaded not guilty to the charge.

    During the trial, the prosecution team, led by Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), called 17 witnesses, following which the court dismissed the defendants’ no-case submission and directed them to enter their defence.

    Trafigura BV and Trafigura PTE Limited, through their counsel, petitioned the AGF to terminate the case, following which the judge discharged the defendants after the prosecution moved a notice of discontinuance.

    But Daudu, in the motion on notice, asked the court to strike out or dismiss the notice of takeover issued by the AGF through the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation for being ultra vires, null and void, same having violated Section 211 (1) of the 1999 Constitution.

    He also prayed the court to set aside or strike out the notice of takeover issued on February 29, 2024, as being shrouded in incompetence and fundamental defect.

    The first defendant had filed an application seeking to dismiss the case, arguing that they had already been tried in a similar case before Justice Sodeton Ogunsanya at the Lagos High Court in Ikeja.

    Justice Dada held that the application lacked merit as there was no nexus between the two cases.

    The judge ordered the continuation trial, but after calling three witnesses, Trafigura’s counsel approached the AGF to terminate the case.

  • NBA slams compulsory voting bill, says it’s unconstitutional, draconian

    NBA slams compulsory voting bill, says it’s unconstitutional, draconian

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has condemned a proposed bill seeking to amend the Electoral Act 2022 to make voting compulsory for all eligible Nigerians, warning that the bill is unconstitutional and a threat to democratic freedoms.

    In a statement issued by its president, Afam Osigwe, SAN, the NBA described the bill, which proposes penalties including fines of up to ₦100,000 or imprisonment for those who fail to vote, as a “draconian affront” to civil liberties enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    “The bill is not only regressive but wholly inconsistent with the spirit and letter of the Constitution. You cannot jail a citizen for choosing silence,” the statement read.

    Citing Section 39(1) of the Constitution, the association argued that the right to freedom of expression includes the right to remain silent and abstain from political participation.

    The NBA further called attention to Section 40, which guarantees freedom of association, including the right not to associate, as grounds to reject any attempt to force citizens to vote.

    “In a democracy, the right to vote is a civil liberty, not a legal obligation. Compelling citizens to vote through coercive legal measures violates the fundamental right of Nigerians to decide whether or not to participate in elections,” the statement noted

    According to Osigwe, “Democracy is not sustained by coercion. It thrives on consent, participation, and trust.

    “The moment citizens are forced to vote under threat of imprisonment, the entire essence of free and fair elections collapses.”

    Read Also: NBA Lagos to address ethical challenges, future of legal services

    The NBA expressed concern that the bill, if passed, could establish a dangerous precedent where refusal to engage in government processes becomes a criminal offence.

    The body warned that such a move would erode civil liberties and legitimise authoritarian impulses under the guise of electoral reform.

    The association also criticised the government for attempting to address low voter turnout with punitive legislation rather than by resolving the root causes of electoral apathy, including insecurity, vote buying, and systemic irregularities.

    The NBA called on the National Assembly to halt all legislative processes related to the proposed amendment, urging lawmakers to focus instead on rebuilding public confidence in the electoral system through reforms that promote transparency, security, and voter education.

    “The NBA will resist any attempt to enforce such draconian provisions and will challenge any law that seeks to weaponize civic participation against the people,” the statement concluded.NBA slams compulsory voting bill, says it’s unconstitutional, draconian

  • FULL LIST: Eight Nigerian basketballers playing in NBA

    FULL LIST: Eight Nigerian basketballers playing in NBA

    Nigerian talents continue to shine on the global stage with basketballers either born in Nigeria or of Nigerian descent making waves in the NBA. From explosive scorers to defensive powerhouses, these players are leaving their mark across the league.

    As of the 2024–2025 NBA season, here are eight Nigerian basketball players currently active in the league:

    1. Precious Achiuwa: 

    Precious Achiuwa, born on September 19, 1999, in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, is a basketballer in the NBA and he plays for the New York Knicks.

    He attended high school in the United States, where he was a consensus five-star recruit and named a McDonald’s All-American.

    Achiuwa was selected with the 20th pick in the 2020 NBA draft by the Miami Heat. On November 25, 2020, Achiuwa signed his rookie scale contract with the Heat.

    In the 2024/2025 season, he averaged 6.85 points per game (PPG), 6.00 rebounds per game (RPG), and 1.07 assists per game (APG).

    2. Adem Bona:

    Adem Bona Okoro (born Ikechukwu Stanley Okoro; 28 March 2003) is a Nigerian-Turkish professional basketball player for the Philadelphia 76ers of the National Basketball Association (NBA).

    He played college basketball for the UCLA Bruins. and was named a McDonald’s All-American in high school.

    On 21 July 2024, Bona was selected by the Philadelphia 76ers in the second round of the 2024 NBA draft with the 41st overall pick. He made his NBA debut on October 23, 2024, in a 124-109 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.

    3. Josh Okogie:

    Joshua Aloiye Okogie, born 1 September 1998, is a Nigerian-American professional basketball player for the Charlotte Hornets of the National Basketball Association (NBA).

    He played college basketball for the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets, and was selected 20th overall in the 2018 NBA draft by the Minnesota Timberwolves, where he spent his first 4 seasons before signing with the Phoenix Suns in 2022.

    Okogie immigrated with his family to the United States when he was three years old. The family settled in Snellville, Georgia, where Okogie started playing basketball for Shiloh High School.

    4. Charles Bassey:

    Charles A. Bassey was born on October 28, 2000 and he is a Nigerian basketball player for the San Antonio Spurs of the National Basketball Association (NBA).

    He played college basketball for the Western Kentucky Hilltoppers. He was drafted by the Philadelphia 76ers in the 2021 NBA draft.

    Bassey was born in Lagos, Nigeria, where he played soccer until age 12, standing 6 feet 1 inch (1.85 m) at the time. At age 14, Bassey was named most valuable player (MVP) of basketball camp Giants of Africa, a program established by Toronto Raptors executive Masai Ujiri.

    At age 14, Bassey stood 6 feet 10 inches (2.08 m) and moved to the United States to continue his basketball career at St. Anthony Catholic High School, a private school in San Antonio, Texas.

    5. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

    Giannis Sina Ugo Antetokounmpo was born December 6, 1994, and is a Nigerian-Greek professional basketball player for the Milwaukee Bucks of the National Basketball Association (NBA).
    His size, speed, strength, and country of origin have earned him the nickname “Greek Freak”. He is widely regarded as one of the greatest power forwards of all time as well as one of the greatest players of all time.

    Born and raised in Athens to Nigerian parents, Antetokounmpo began playing basketball for the youth teams of Filathlitikos in Athens. In 2011, he began playing for the club’s senior team before entering the 2013 NBA draft, where he was selected 15th overall by the Bucks. In 2016–17, he led the Bucks in all five major statistical categories and became the first player in NBA history to finish a regular season in the top 20 in all five statistics: total points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks.

    He is a two-time MVP award winner and has received nine All-Star selections, he also won the NBA championship in 2021.

    6. Gabe Vincent:

    Gabriel Nnamdi Vincent (born June 14, 1996) is a Nigerian-American professional basketball player for the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA) and the Nigerian national basketball team.

    Read Also: Nigeria’s U-18 basketballers battle for glory in Abidjan

    He played college basketball for the UC Santa Barbara Gauchos. Undrafted out of college, Vincent signed with the Stockton Kings of the NBA G League before joining the Miami Heat on a two-way contract. With Miami, he reached the NBA Finals in 2020 and 2023 before signing with the Lakers.

    7. Jonathan Mogbo:

    Jonathan Michael Mogbo was born October 29, 2001 and is an American basketball player for the Toronto Raptors of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played college basketball for the Independence CC Pirates, the Northeastern Oklahoma A&M Golden Norsemen, the Missouri State Bears and the San Francisco Dons.

    Mogbo was raised in Wellington, Florida, by his parents Chuck and Karen Mogbo. His father is of Nigerian descent and his mother is Jamaican. Mogbo has two older stepbrothers and one older brother.

    On June 27, 2024, Mogbo was selected with the 31st overall pick by the Toronto Raptors in the 2024 NBA draft and on July 4, he signed with them. Throughout his rookie season, he has been assigned several times to Raptors 905. On April 9, 2025, Mogbo recorded his first career triple-double with 17 points, 11 assists, and 10 rebounds in a 126–96 win over the Charlotte Hornets.

    8. Monte Morris:

    Monte Morris is a Nigerian-American professional basketball player currently playing as a point guard for the Phoenix Suns in the NBA.

    Born on June 27, 1995, in Grand Rapids, Michigan, he was raised in Flint, where he attended Flint Beecher High School. During his high school career, Morris led his team in scoring, assists, and steals for four consecutive years and was honored as Michigan’s Mr. Basketball in 2013.

    Over the years, Morris has played for several NBA teams, including the Denver Nuggets, Washington Wizards, Detroit Pistons, and Minnesota Timberwolves.

    In July 2024, he signed a one-year contract with the Phoenix Suns. As of the 2024–25 NBA season, Morris is averaging 5.2 points, 1.5 rebounds, and 1.6 assists per game, with a field goal percentage of 42.6%.

  • Refund N300m Rivers donation to restore public trust, lawyers tell NBA

    Refund N300m Rivers donation to restore public trust, lawyers tell NBA

    The Public Interest Lawyers League (PILL) has urged the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to refund the controversial N300 million donation it received from the Rivers State Government under Governor Siminalayi Fubara, saying the move is necessary to restore public trust and safeguard the Bar’s moral authority.

    Speaking at a press conference in Abuja on Thursday, its President Dr. Abdul Mahmud, said the non-disclosure of the donation, which came to public attention through a statement by the Sole Administrator of Rivers State, has raised serious questions about transparency and ethical conduct within the NBA.

    “This is not just about money, it’s about principle, accountability, and the integrity of an institution that has long positioned itself as a guardian of the rule of law.

    “The NBA must take immediate steps to return the N300 million to the Rivers State Government. Doing so would demonstrate a clear commitment to ethical leadership and institutional responsibility,” Mahmud said.

    Beyond the call for a refund, PILL also demanded the resignation of Afam Osigwe, SAN, President of the NBA, and Emeka Obegolu, SAN, Chairman of the NBA Annual General Conference Planning Committee.

    According to the group, these resignations are not punitive but necessary to rebuild confidence in the Association.

    “We believe the current leadership must step aside in the interest of accountability and to allow for a thorough review of the NBA’s financial dealings.

    “Professional associations must be held to the same standards they expect of others, and when issues of this magnitude arise, leadership responsibility must be taken,” he said.

    The controversy has also reignited debate around the relocation of the NBA’s 2025 Annual General Conference from Port Harcourt, Rivers State, to Enugu.

    PILL questioned whether the relocation was a strategic move to deflect attention from the scandal and called on the Planning Committee to offer a full explanation of the reasons and financial implications behind the decision.

    Mahmud added that transparency should be non-negotiable in professional institutions, particularly where public funds or sensitive matters are involved.

    “The Bar cannot afford to be seen as operating in secrecy or appearing complicit in actions that could undermine its standing,” he said.

    Read Also: Rivers: One month after emergency rule

    To chart a path forward, PILL also called on the NBA to publish a full and audited account of all funds received in connection with the 2025 Annual General Conference; convene an emergency General Meeting to discuss the implications of the scandal; and establish an independent panel, made up of past NBA Presidents and respected legal figures, to recommend reforms aimed at strengthening financial transparency and internal accountability.

    “This is an opportunity for the NBA to show leadership, not just to lawyers, but to the country. The credibility of the Bar matters. We must hold ourselves to the standards we expect of others,” he said.

    He further encouraged members of the legal profession not to remain silent.

    “This is your Association. This is your profession. We urge every lawyer who believes in justice and ethics to speak out, engage, and demand the reform our Bar so urgently needs,” he said. 

  • NBA condemns arson

    NBA condemns arson

    Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Osogbo branch, has condemned the arson at Osun High Court in Ilesa.

    NBA, in a statement by its Chairman, Mr Yemi Abiona, yesterday in Osogbo, described the incident as a “heinous attack that poses a serious threat to justice delivery and the rule of law”.

    According to Abiona, ‘’it is worrisome that such a dastardly attack is happening the second time, having recorded a similar incident a few years ago in Court 3, where the chamber of the judge was razed.

    “I wonder what the perpetrators of such an attack on the court room intended to achieve. This attack is the handiwork of faceless cowards.

    “Although, the cause of this arson is still subject to investigation, from indications, the inferno cannot be an act of God.

    Read Also: Rivers vs NBA: How to calm the N300m storm, by legal giants

    “We only wonder what the perpetrators intend to achieve by setting fire to court rooms where documents are kept.”

    The chairman hailed Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke for his swift response of directing thorough investigations and increased security measures around the court premises.

    Abiona, who urged security agencies to arrest the perpetrators and bring them to justice, said the association was ready to provide free legal services to prosecute whoever was behind the arson.

  • Duplicity by another name

    Duplicity by another name

    Nigerians must consider themselves ‘indebted’ to the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), first, for giving new meanings to the once-familiar concepts of ‘principles’, ‘morality’, ‘law’ and ‘constitutionalism’, and second, for insisting on operationalising them in their new, but self-assigned opposition role in the ongoing Rivers fracas.

    Thanks to the august body, the string of absurdities which started with the torching of the parliament building, the banishing of 27 in a parliament of 32 members into the proverbial Siberia and their subsequent replacement with three members, the running of the business of government without a duly passed appropriation law and other heinous constitutional infractions are supposed to count for nothing.

    Even less – in their view – is the unambiguous, declarative judgment of the highest court dubbing the Fubara-led contraption in Rivers State – and that is what it is – as the height of despotism. 

    In the eyes of the Afam Osigwe-led NBA, those fundamental infractions should still be deemed as tolerable and that is even long after the Supreme Court had pronounced on the death of law and constitutionalism in the aftermath of Governor Sim Fubara’s coup in the state!

    Wouldn’t that amount to defecating in the communal pond – in a moment of opportunistic exigency?

    Imagine, we are supposed to be dealing with a grave matter – the subversion of those fundamental tenets of democracy; one whose terrible derivative, was the treatment of the legislature branch as expendables! It is certainly a new day that the NBA has since deemed them as tolerable – including the open call for anarchy by the dictator!

    Read Also: Tinubu returns after Europe working visit

    Could the strident defence of those absurdities have also counted for the defence of principles and constitutionalism in the books of the NBA?

    Even with the above background, the tragedy is that the NBA continues to push the specious narrative that the problem in Rivers State actually started on March 18 when the state of emergency was declared by President Bola Tinubu. Ever since, the body has somewhat assumed the role of the judge in all things right and wrong. Finally, Nigerians are beginning to know why! And that is far from ennobling!

    Little wonder the NBA has pronounced the president wrong to have staved off the looming anarchy; wrong to have directed the combatants to take time to rest in the event that truce was nowhere on the horizon; and wrong with his appointment of a sole administrator to take charge to allow things to cool down. And then the National Assembly for approving the declaration as the law required.

    Talk of a body traditionally sworn to the defence of the rule of law and constitutionalism, finally revealed as having a dog in a most unnecessary fight!

    And the result? Muck everywhere. And so the predictable verdict by the same NBAS – the once-famed Garden City is no longer place to do business. Why? Because the government halted the spiral of impunity by a benevolent despot who once declared that the parliament can only exist to the extent that he allows it!

    In their sponsored anomie, we are supposed to be torn between the Supreme Court-declared constitutional aberration and the National Assembly-approved administrator temporarily holding the reins of government in the Garden City! Well, they, the NBA and their allies could not be more wrong!

    Yes, we grant our ‘principled’ NBA the right to its persuasion that living under the former’s jungle rule characterised by impunity would have been more dignifying than the mere thought of staging the high-octane event under the latter brought in to preserve peace and order. Only that we must give thanks that body does not have the last word!

    To be sure, no one is contesting the body’s freedom to take their AGC to Enugu or wherever! It is entirely their business. They also free to glorify their stance as a ‘principled stand against the unconstitutional governance of Rivers State’. Or even still, their insistence that continuing with the AGC in Port Harcourt would have amounted to “a tacit endorsement of constitutional violations and subversion of the rule of law.” And finally the declaration that the NBA “could not, in good conscience, hold its flagship event in a state governed unconstitutionally. These are entirely the body’s prerogatives.

    Except that in the exercise of their discretions, the body not only chose to lapse into an unforgivable amnesia, they forgot one little matter that was just as important to Nigerians and to the good people of Rivers State – the N300 million paid by the suspended governor to the NBA to host the event. The revelation obviously sheds some light into the dynamics at play as indeed the motivations behind them.

    For now, the issue is that the state has been denied the hosting rights to the event and the good people of the state of its potentially accruable benefits. And so the administration in the state wants the money back.

    That should ordinarily be fair or if you like – just, if you ask me!

    On its part, the NBA says that the state should not only perish the thought, but also that nothing of the sort is being contemplated – a case of double whammy. It says the fund was “a gift” to the association for its 2025 Annual General Conference, not tied to any hosting rights. It claims the NBA usually seeks support from organisations, government agencies and state governments due to the “enormous cost” involved in hosting the conference.

    While those may well be, still, they do not vitiate the issues of principle, of law and of due process. Here, it ought to be strange that the NBA would choose not be bothered that the fund could not have been lawfully appropriated by the three-man parliament that the donor (or is it their client) opted to work with.

    Even more deplorable is the very idea of holding on to what appears to be an unlawful item when the demand was made. For while the NBA might feel entitled to whatever pretences it deems fit to project, to most discerning Nigerians, that stance could only be a measure of the ingrained pathology of impunity that has led the state as indeed our beloved country to this sorry pass. Trust Nigerians to recognise duplicity when it manifests. The latter would seem one which no puerile legalism would wash.

    For now, Nigerians have to wait for the courts to determine who, between the NBA and the Rivers people, is right or wrong.

    Talk of the strange times we are in.

  • Angelina Pay My Money: NBA’s N300m ethical dilemma with Rivers State

    Angelina Pay My Money: NBA’s N300m ethical dilemma with Rivers State

    The late Rex Lawson could never have imagined his hit song “Angelina Pay My Money” would perfectly capture the financial standoff between the Nigerian Bar Association and Rivers State government over 300 million Naira in conference funding.

    At the heart of this controversy is a substantial sum of 300 million Naira that was allocated by the suspended Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, to the NBA for hosting their conference in Rivers State. However, following political developments including the declaration of a State of Emergency by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the appointment of a Sole Administrator (Ibok-Ete Ibas), the NBA decided to relocate its conference to Enugu State.

    The NBA justified this relocation citing concerns about the political climate in Rivers State, stating that the current governance structure under the Sole Administrator had created conditions unsuitable for hosting their significant legal gathering. Their position, representing eight branches in Rivers, was that the political environment no longer aligned with the legal community’s values and expectations in a democracy.

    This decision has created a critical ethical question: Should the NBA return the 300 million Naira now that the conference will no longer be held in Rivers State?

    For starters, the sheer size of the allocation raises pertinent questions about the association’s financial requirements for conference hosting. Three hundred million Naira represents a prodigious sum for a professional conference, even one of national significance. This leads to legitimate inquiries about the NBA’s budgetary framework and how such funds are typically deployed across venue procurement, logistics, accommodations, and other operational expenses. Professional associations worldwide typically operate with transparent financial protocols, particularly when receiving public funds. The NBA’s requirement for such a substantial government contribution warrants scrutiny in the context of professional governance standards and fiscal responsibility.

    Read Also: FULL LIST: Trump mulls shut down of US embassies in Africa

    Moreso, when funds are allocated for a specific purpose that subsequently becomes nullified for any reason, basic ethical principles of financial stewardship would suggest that restitution is the appropriate course of action. The moment the NBA determined that Rivers State would no longer serve as the conference venue, the association entered a moral labyrinth from which the clearest exit would be returning the funds to the coffers of the Rivers State Government.

    This position is strengthened by the fact that the money’s distribution was explicitly tied to a specific deliverable – hosting the conference in Rivers State. When that contractual premise dissolved, so too did the justification for retaining the funds. Had the money been provided as a general endowment or unconditional support for the NBA’s activities, then the ethical considerations might differ substantially.

    For an organization that represents the pinnacle of legal ethics and professional conduct, the NBA’s resistance to refunding the 300 million Naira creates a paradoxical situation. The legal profession stands as a bulwark of societal order, with practitioners sworn to uphold principles of justice, fairness, and integrity. The current financial impasse threatens to cast a penumbral shadow over the association’s moral standing.

    Professional honor in this instance would seem to dictate a straightforward approach: acknowledge that the conditions for fund utilization no longer exist and facilitate the return of public resources to their source. This would demonstrate the NBA’s commitment to fiscal rectitude and ethical conduct beyond reproach.

    The political dimension cannot be ignored in this financial dispute. The NBA’s decision to withdraw from Rivers State represents a significant political statement about the current administration, specifically the Sole Administrator’s governance approach. While the association has every right to make such assessments and act accordingly, those decisions carry implications that must be addressed with equivalent deliberation and integrity, if Rivers State is no longer suitable for a conference, it’s funds should also not be suitable in its kitty.

    The refusal to refund could be interpreted as an attempt to financially penalize a political entity with which the NBA has substantive disagreements. Such an approach would introduce a dangerous precedent wherein professional bodies might leverage financial mechanisms to express political disapprobation – a practice that could potentially undermine institutional neutrality.

    As this financial riptide continues to pull both parties into deeper controversy, the NBA finds itself at a critical juncture where its decisions will either reinforce or diminish its standing as an exemplar of professional ethics. This is not the kind of association it’s current President, Afam Osigwe promised Nigerians and the association must consider whether the temporary advantage of retaining these funds outweighs the potential long-term damage to its reputation for integrity and fair dealing.

    The honorable course appears unambiguous: the NBA should acknowledge that the specific purpose for which funds were provided will not be fulfilled and consequently return the 300 million Naira to Rivers State. This action would demonstrate that even in times of political discord, professional organizations can operate with unwavering commitment to ethical principles.

    The current dispute presents an opportunity for the NBA to reaffirm its dedication to probity by demonstrating that its ethical standards remain inviolable regardless of political circumstances. In doing so, it would set a powerful precedent for professional conduct in Nigeria’s sometimes tumultuous public sphere.

    The ongoing financial dispute between the NBA and Rivers State exemplifies how professional organizations must navigate the complex intersection of ethics, politics, and fiscal responsibility. While the association’s concerns about Rivers State’s political environment may be legitimate, these considerations cannot abrogate fundamental principles of integrity and financial accountability.

    For an organization entrusted with upholding justice and integrity within Nigeria’s legal framework, the path forward seems clear: honor the original purpose of the funds by returning them to their source. In doing so, the NBA would demonstrate that its commitment to ethical conduct remains steadfast, even amidst the turbulent political waters it now navigates.

  • NBA’s obtainment tangle

    NBA’s obtainment tangle

    The ink had hardly dried on the sheets proclaiming emergency rule in Rivers State than the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) started hoofing it was unconstitutional! 

    No one, back then, could have guessed that was more for a Fubara obtainment, than for NBA’s ballyhooed rule of law!  But now, folks know better!

    Whether the NBA claim is correct or not, on the disputed cash, is now sub-judice.  But however the case goes, not all the legalese in NBA’s cocky arsenal could wash this obtainment scandal off its body, just as not all of the waters in the Atlantic could clean the deranged Lady Macbeth’s bloody hands of regicide.  It’s clearly not the NBA’s finest hour!

    Pushing its “rule of law” gallery play, the NBA had, full of legalistic flourish, announced the shifting of its conference from Port Harcourt, Rivers, to Enugu, Enugu State.  It claimed it couldn’t, in all good conscience, hold its parley in an outpost under the yoke of an undemocratic sole administrator!

    Wait a minute, that’s cant! — Rtd. Vice Admiral Ibok-ete Ibas, the Rivers administrator, roared back.  If you want to move your conference, that’s fine.  But return “our” N300 million!  You can’t bad-mouth a state, yet take its money!

    From that spot, our “rule of law” NBA started speaking in tongues!  First, it wasn’t tied to any hosting right.  Then, it was free and unconditional gift — as if there is ever a free lunch even in Freetown!  In any case, Ibas should produce any signed document committing NBA to holding its conference in Port Harcourt.  We’re keeping the cash! All gas!  All cant!  All legalese!  Yet, no respite.

    Read Also: Rivers lawmaker accuses NBA of hypocrisy, insists on refund of N300 million to state

    Let the NBA do the honourable thing: return the cash — and stop this disgraceful quibbling over a night it can’t spin into a day, no matter how hard it tries.

    And while at that: it must give us full disclosure too.  With Enugu now its new bride, did it do a fresh obtainment from the Enugu government?  Or it was “rule of law” that propelled its reason?  We have a right to full disclosure!

    But before anyone starts pointing fingers and playing the saint, just remember that cynical Nigerian quip: we’re all rogues, but whoever is caught out becomes “barawo”!

    This parasitizing on the government and turning round to roast that same government is a Nigerian elite specialty.  Very early in this same 4th Republic, the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) created its own racket, making themselves self-imposed judges over state governments’ project performance, with its leaders savouring the resulting sushi, after a scandalous tour of some states!

    So, as it is, there’s an NBA in the Nigerian elite DNA — the NBA in all of us? The Yoruba call it “ajeniseni” — in coarsest and most cynical pidgin: “chop and clean mouth”!

    Let the NBA do what’s right — and thanks to the “undemocratic” Ibas: he summoned the courage to expose the holy hypocrisy of our “democratic” NBA! 

    No country thrives on self-imposed lies!